DOCSLIB.ORG

Importance of Tactile and Visual Stimuli of Eggs and Nest for Termination of Egg Laying of Red Junglefowl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Importance of Tactile and Visual Stimuli of Eggs and Nest for Termination of Egg Laying of Red Junglefowl The Auk 112(2):483-488, 1995 IMPORTANCE OF TACTILE AND VISUAL STIMULI OF EGGS AND NEST FOR TERMINATION OF EGG LAYING OF RED JUNGLEFOWL THEO MEIJER Departmentof Ethology,University of BieIefeld,P.O. Box100131, 33501Bielefeld, Germany ABSTRACT.--Experimentswere conductedto separatethe influence of tactile and visual stimuli emanating from the nest or eggs on the development of incubation behavior, the terminationof egg laying, and the determinationof clutchsize. Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus)hens, whose eggswere left inside the nest (experiment 1), receivedboth tactile and visualinformation, remained in the nestbox longer,and stoppedlaying after eight days (or sixeggs). Sixteen or 17females incubated. Leaving only the firstegg in the nest(experiment 2) gavesimilar results. When the eggslaid were placedunder a wire-meshbasket (experiment 3) suchthat the hen couldsee but not touchthe accumulatingeggs, laying stopped two days (or one egg) later than in experiment1, and mosthens "incubated"on the empty nestuntil the nestbox wasremoved. Surprisingly, when eggswere continuallyremoved (experiment 4), hensalso incubated progressively more, stopped laying after two weeks(or nine eggs), and then sat on the empty nest for one or more days. Stimulation of the brood patch by the nest alone led to more incubationand to termination of egg laying. Visual stimuli alone providedby eggsaccelerated both processesand were sufficientfor one-half of the hens to maintainfull incubationbehavior. Red Junglefowl do not appearto judgeclutch size visually. Received9 December1993, accepted25 February1994. DURING THE BREEDINGSEASON, a female has to nest. The few experimentsby which tactile in- make two important "decisions":when to start formation coming from the brood patch was laying, and when to stop laying. The period manipulatedby localanesthesia (Hall and Gold- between the onset and the end of egg laying smith 1983) or denervation (Hall 1987) failed (as well as the interval between eggs) deter- to show a direct behavioraleffect in incubating mines the number of eggs in a clutch (clutch female domestic ducks (Anas plathyrhynchos). size). Denervation of the brood patch in laying tur- During the laying period, eggsaccumulate in keys (Meleagrisgallopavo; eggs removed contin- the nest, and females of both altricial (Haftorn ually) shortenedthe time spent in the nest and 1981, Zebra and Morton 1983, Beukeboom et al. inhibited full development of incubation be- 1988, Meijer 1990) and precocialspecies (Par- havior (Book et al. 1991). Experimentsto test sons 1972, Caldwell and Cornwell 1975, Drent the influence of tactile and visual stimuli sep- 1975, Afton 1980, Kennamer et al. 1990, Hall aratelyduring the laying period are even rarer. 1991,Meijer and Siemers1994) sit on the nest Steen and Parker (1981), conducting experi- for a longer time each day. At the end of the mentsin which eggsaccumulated under a wire- laying period, femalesincubate for almostthe mesh basket beside the real nest, claimed that whole day and, in the ovary, follicle develop- bantam (Gallusdomesticus) hens can judge their ment becomessuppressed. The gradualincrease clutch size by visual stimuli alone. of incubationis a goodpredictor of clutch size I present data on the egg-laying behavior of (Haftorn 1981, 1985, Meijer 1990, 1993, Meijer Red Junglefowl (Gallusgallus spadiceus; Kruijt et al. 1990) 1964, Meijer and Siemers 1994). ! tried to sep- Visual and tactile stimuli can inform the lay- arate the influence of stimuli emanatingfrom ing femaleabout the numberof eggsin the nest the nest from thoseprovided by eggs.Also, I (Klomp 1970, Murton and Westwood 1977). It set up an experiment to distinguish the influ- is apparentfrom egg-removaland egg-addition ence of visual and tactile information on the experiments(for reviews, see Kennedy 1991, development of incubation behavior, the ter- Haywood 1994)that femalesof a variety of bird mination of egg laying, and the determination speciestake noticeof the number of eggsin the of clutch size. 483 484 THEOMEIJER [Auk, Vol. 112 TABLE1. Summaryof the main resultsfor four ex- periments:(1) eggs accumulated inside nest; (2) only firstegg laid left in nest;(3) eggsaccumulated next to nest under wire mesh; and (4) eggs removed every day. No. hens Day when Ex- (%) on Clutch stopped peri- No. nestat size laying ment hens night (œ+ SD) (œ+ SD) 1 17 16 (94) 6.1 + 0.9 8.2 + 1.3 2 10 8 (80) 5.6 _ 1.3 8.4 _+ 3.1 .E •" ©© - •©©© - © - © - 3 13 11 (85) 7.2 _+ 1.9 9.8 _+2.8 4 14 7 (50) 9.0 + 2.8 13.9 + 5.9 METHODS Experimentswere conducted using 21 pairs of Red Junglefowlhatched from eight clutches in the early summerof 1992(see Meijer and Siemers1994). The birdslived in largeoutdoor aviaries in threemixed groupsover the winter and started to layduring late 200 Decemberand January(see Sharp 1993) at an ageof 100 six months.Eggs were removeddaily. From25 Feb- ruary,they were held pairwise(one male and one female)in adjacentoutdoor aviaries (1.5 m wide x 4.5m long x 3.0m high)under natural daylight and days after first egg temperatureconditions. Each pen contained a shelter Fig. 1. Representativeexamples of egg-layingpat- (1.0 x 1.0 x 1.5m) with roostingperches and a nest terns (top of each diagram)and developmentof in- box(27 x 50 x 23 cm).Commercial chicken food and cubationbehavior when: (A) eggsaccumulated inside waterwere providedad libitum daily. nest(experiment 1); (B) eggs accumulated next to nest As a measure of incubation behavior (see fig. 1 in under wire mesh (experiment 3); and (C) eggs re- Meijer and Siemers1994), nest temperaturewas re- movedevery afternoon (experiment 4). Eggmass (g) cordedevery 5 min with NiCrNi thermistorssituated shownwithin eggsymbol; pause days indicated with on the bottom of the nest cup and connectedto a 16- dash. Full incubation, which lasted until nest box channeldatalogger (Squirrel 1205, Grant England). removed(indicated by arrow)is representedby solid To separatetactile from visualstimuli nest boxes were line. At end of laying, females38, 32, and 41 attended divided into two halves, one of which was covered emptynest only for one night (indicatedwith N). with wire mesh (seeSteen and Parker 1981). The bot- tom of the wooden nest box was covered with a rubber (after two to three weeks), one of the other three padhaving fingers (3.5 mm diameter,15 mm height) toppedwith a nipple(0.9 mm diameter,1.0 mm height; experimentswas carried out (the orderof which was randomized). Vencomatic,The Netherlands), over which was place a layerof hay.In the lateafternoon (1600-1700 MET), nestboxes were checked,eggs were marked,and eggs RESULTS weighedto the nearest0.01 g (SartoriusPt 120).Be- tween late March and early June, four experiments Experiment1: Full tactile and visual stimula- were conductedin which: (1) eggswere put back,so tion.--In the control situation, when females that eggsaccumulated inside the nest(n = 17different were allowed to keep their eggsinside the nest, females);(2) only the first egg laid wasput backand they stoppedlaying after an averageperiod of otherswere removed (n = 10); (3) eggswere put back 8.2 +_SD of 1.3days (n = 17;see Table 1). During into other half of nest box, under wire mesh, so that this period, femalesremained in the nest box accumulatingeggs were within sight of the hen, but for a longer period each day (seeFig. iA), and she could not touch them (n = 13); (4) eggs were incubatedalso during the night on the day the continuouslyremoved (n = 14). When femalesstopped laying, they were allowed penultimateor the lastegg was laid. Sixteenof to incubatefor a maximum of four to five days,after 17 females incubated continuously from the which the nest box (with eggs)was removed for a momentthe lastegg was laid. The other female periodof five days.When hensstarted to lay again (no. 30) attended the nest box 30 to 50 min while April 1995] Terminationof EggLaying 485 (from 20 to over 250 min); however,after being driven off the nest twice at the end of laying (during the afternoon inspection),she did not start full incubation. The other female (no. 9) stoppedlaying after five eggs,without any in- crease in incubation behavior. Experiment3: Permanentvisual stimulation of ß eggs.--Whenthe eggswere put under the wire mesh in the afternoon so that females could only seebut not touch them, the hensstopped laying after 9.8 _+2.8 days(range 6-14 days,7.2 _+1.9 eggs,n = 13;Fig. 2). All 13 femalesshowed an increasein incubationbehavior during the laying period (see Fig. lB), two did not start night incubation,five incubatedduring one (e.g. no. 38; seeFig. lB) or two nights,and the other six incubatednext to the clutch on an empty nest until the nest box was removed (e.g. no. 34; see Fig. lB). Experiment4: No visual.stimulation.--When I one egg acc. eggs acc. eggs eggs continually removed the eggslaid (in the late afternoon),hens stopped laying after 13.9 + 5.9 Fig.2. Numberof eggslaid by femaleswhen: only days (range 6-29 days,9.0 _+2.8 eggs,n = 14; first egg laid left in nest (experiment2); eggs accu- mulated(acc.) inside nest (experiment1); eggsaccu- see Fig. 2). Nest attendanceslowly increased, mulated next to nest under wire mesh (experiment and egg massdecreased as laying progressed 3); and eggsremoved every day (experiment4). Each (Fig. 1C). Five of 14 females did not return to dot representsclutch size of single hen. the empty nest after being gently driven off during the afternoon control (they had incu- batedthe last eggat that momentfor 198 + 107 laying eachof the first four eggs,and over 200 min). Another sevensat on the empty nest con- min for the last (eighth) egg, but did not in- tinuously at the end of the laying period for cubateduring the night. one to three days. All femalesstopped "incu- Clutchescontained 6.1 _+ 0.9 eggs (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reproductive Ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon Harmani in Scrub Environment, with Special Reference to the Effect of Food
    Ibis (2003), 145, 657–666 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Reproductive ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environment, with special reference to the effect of food XIN LU1* & GUANG-MEI ZHENG2 1Department of Zoology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China 2Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China We studied the nesting ecology of two groups of the endangered Tibetan Eared Pheasants Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environments near Lhasa, Tibet, during 1996 and 1999–2001. One group received artificial food from a nunnery prior to incubation whereas the other fed on natural food. This difference in the birds’ nutritional history allowed us to assess the effects of food on reproduction. Laying occurred between mid-April and early June, with a peak at the end of April or early May. Eggs were laid around noon. Adult females produced one clutch per year. Clutch size averaged 7.4 eggs (4–11). Incubation lasted 24–25 days. We observed a higher nesting success (67.7%) than reported for other eared pheasants. Pro- visioning had no significant effect on the timing of clutch initiation or nesting success, and a weak effect on egg size and clutch size (explaining 8.2% and 9.1% of the observed variation, respectively). These results were attributed to the observation that the unprovisioned birds had not experienced local food shortage before laying, despite spending more time feeding and less time resting than the provisioned birds. Nest-site selection by the pheasants was non-random with respect to environmental variables. Rock-cavities with an entrance aver- aging 0.32 m2 in size and not deeper than 1.5 m were greatly preferred as nest-sites.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Somerset Birds
    A Checklist of Somerset Birds The Somerset List to the end of 2014 contains 357 species. Using the BOURC classification 336 are in Category A, 18 in B and three in C. Golden Pheasant has been removed from the list as it is considered that there never was a self-sustaining population in Somerset. An explanation of the BOUC classification is given below. A Species that have been recorded in an apparently natural state at least once since 1 January 1950. B Species that have been recorded in an apparently natural state at least prior to 31 December 1949, but have not been recorded subsequently. C1 Naturalized introduced species - species that have occurred only as a result of introduction, e.g. Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiacus C2 Naturalized established species – species with established populations resulting from introduction by Man, but which also occur in an apparently natural state, e.g. Greylag Goose Anser anser C3 Naturalized re-established species – species with populations successfully re-established by Man in areas of former occurrence, e.g. Red Kite Milvus milvus. C4 Naturalized feral species – domesticated species with populations established in the wild, e.g. Rock Pigeon (Dove)/Feral Pigeon Columba livia C5 Vagrant naturalized species – species from established naturalized populations abroad, e.g. possibly some Ruddy Shelducks Tadorna ferruginea occurring in Britain. There are currently no species in category C5. C6 Former naturalized species - species formerly placed in C1 whose naturalized populations are either no longer self-sustaining or are considered extinct, e.g. Lady Amherst’s Pheasant Chrysolophus amherstiae. D Species that would otherwise appear in Category A except that there is reasonable doubt that they have ever occurred in a natural state.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 1983 Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants" (1983). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HYBRIDIZATION & ZOOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PHEASANTS PAUL A. JOHNSGARD The purpose of this paper is to infonn members of the W.P.A. of an unusual scientific use of the extent and significance of hybridization among pheasants (tribe Phasianini in the proposed classification of Johnsgard~ 1973). This has occasionally occurred naturally, as for example between such locally sympatric species pairs as the kalij (Lophura leucol11elana) and the silver pheasant (L. nycthelnera), but usually occurs "'accidentally" in captive birds, especially in the absence of conspecific mates. Rarely has it been specifically planned for scientific purposes, such as for obtaining genetic, morphological, or biochemical information on hybrid haemoglobins (Brush. 1967), trans­ ferins (Crozier, 1967), or immunoelectrophoretic comparisons of blood sera (Sato, Ishi and HiraI, 1967). The literature has been summarized by Gray (1958), Delacour (1977), and Rutgers and Norris (1970). Some of these alleged hybrids, especially those not involving other Galliformes, were inadequately doculnented, and in a few cases such as a supposed hybrid between domestic fowl (Gallus gal/us) and the lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) can be discounted.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichostrongylus Cramae N. Sp. (Nematoda), a Parasite of Bob-White Quail (Colinus Virginianus) M.-C
    Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp., Key-words: Trichostrongylus. Birds. Europe. USA. Trichos- 1993, 68 : n° 1, 43-48. trongylus tenuis. T. cramae n. sp. Lagopus scoticus. Pavo cris- tatus. Perdix perdix. Phasianus colchicus. Colinus virginianus. Mémoire. Mots-clés : Trichostrongylus. Oiseaux. Europe. USA. Trichos­ trongylus tenuis. T. cramae n. sp. Lagopus scoticus. Pavo cris- tatus. Perdix perdix. Phasianus colchicus. Colinus virginianus. TRICHOSTRONGYLUS CRAMAE N. SP. (NEMATODA), A PARASITE OF BOB-WHITE QUAIL (COLINUS VIRGINIANUS) M.-C. DURETTE-DESSET*, A. G. CHABAUD*, J. MOORE** Summary ---------------------------------------------------------- Cram (1925, 1927) incorrectly identified as T. pergracilis (now the cuticular striation, the relative distances between the second, a synonym of T. tenuis) what was in reality an undescribed spe­ third and fourth bursal papillae and the configuration of the dorsal cies in Colinus virginianus. ray. Red grouse (Lagopus scoticus), the type host of T. pergra­ Trichostrongylus cramae n. sp. is proposed for T. pergracilis cilis, was in fact found to be parasitized by T. tenuis, confirming sensu Cram, 1927 nec Cobbold, 1873 from C. virginianus from the synonymy of T. pergracilis and T. tenuis. USA. It differs from T. tenuis (Mehlis in Creplin, 1846) as regards Résumé : Trichostrongylus cramae n. sp. (Nematoda) parasite de Colinus virginianus. Cram (1925, 1927) a identifié par erreur comme étant T. per­ Il se différencie de T. tenuis (Mehlis in Creplin, 1846) par la gracilis, maintenant considéré comme un synonyme de T. tenuis, striation cuticulaire, les distances relatives entre les papilles bur- ce qui était en réalité une espèce non décrite parasite de Colinus sales 2, 3 et 4, et par la configuration de la côte dorsale.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Molt and Plumage
    The Auk 124(2):ART–XXX, 2007 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2007. Printed in USA. REVISION OF MOLT AND PLUMAGE TERMINOLOGY IN PTARMIGAN (PHASIANIDAE: LAGOPUS SPP.) BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS Peter Pyle1 The Institute for Bird Populations, P.O. Box 1346, Point Reyes Station, California 94956, USA Abstract.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt. A spring contour molt was signifi cantly later and more extensive in females than in males, a summer contour molt was signifi cantly earlier and more extensive in males than in females, and complete summer–fall wing and contour molts were statistically similar in timing between the sexes. Completeness of feather replacement, similarities between the sexes, and comparison of molts with those of related taxa indicate that the white winter plumage of ptarmigan should be considered the basic plumage, with shi s in hormonal and endocrinological cycles explaining diff erences in plumage coloration compared with those of other phasianids. Assignment of prealternate and pre- supplemental molts in ptarmigan necessitates the examination of molt evolution in Galloanseres. Using comparisons with Anserinae and Anatinae, I considered a novel interpretation: that molts in ptarmigan have evolved separately within each sex, and that the presupplemental and prealternate molts show sex-specifi c sequences within the defi nitive molt cycle. Received 13 June 2005, accepted 7 April 2006. Key words: evolution, Lagopus, molt, nomenclature, plumage, ptarmigan. Revision of Molt and Plumage Terminology in Ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.) Based on Evolutionary Considerations Rese.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Intergeneric Galliform Hybrids: a Review
    INTERGENERIC GALLIFORM HYBRIDS : A REVIEW BY TONY J. PETERLE Henry Seebohm, in “The Birds of Siberia” (1901: Sol-502), makes this cogent observa- tion: “The subject of the interbreeding of nearly-allied birds in certain localities where their geographical ranges meet or overlap, and the almost identical subject of the existence of intermediate forms in the intervening district between the respective geographical ranges of nearly-allied birds, is one which has not yet received the attention which it deserves from ornithologists. The older brethren of the fraternity have always pooh-pooh’d any attempt to explain some of these complicated facts of nature by the theory of interbreeding, and have looked upon the suggestion that hybridisation was anything but an abnormal circumstance as one of the lamest modes of getting out of an ornithological difficulty.” The following sum- mary will show that interbreeding of galliform genera has often been observed: indeed that two wholly different intergeneric hybrids, one of the Old World, one of the New, have been recovered so often that they can hardly be considered ‘abnormal’ except in a very limited sense. The Old World hybrid referred to results from the crossing of the Blackcock (Lyvurus) and Capercaillie (Tetrao). DeWinton (1894: 448) said that “of all hybrids among birds in a wild state this one seems to be the most frequent.” Authors seem to be in agreement that the hybrid results principally, if not always, from the interbreeding of male Lyrurus with fe- male Tetreo in areas throughout which (a) extension of range is taking place, or (b) one or the other genus is rare, e.g., Scotland, where Tetrao has been introduced following extirpation (Millais, 1906: 55-56; DeWinton, 1894).
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE-TAILED PTARMIGAN, (Lagopus Leucura) AS a THREATENED SPECIES UNDER the ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    Photo © Christian Nunes PETITION TO LIST THE WHITE-TAILED PTARMIGAN, (Lagopus leucura) AS A THREATENED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT August 24, 2010 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY PETITIONER 1 August 24, 2010 TO: Mr. Ken Salazar Secretary of the Interior 18th and "C" Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 Dear Secretary Salazar: Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. §424.14(a), The Center for Biological Diversity hereby formally petitions the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), to list either the U.S. population or Rocky Mountains population of the white-tailed ptarmigan (Lagopus leucura) as a threatened species and to designate critical habitat concurrent with listing. FWS has jurisdiction over this petition. This petition sets in motion a specific process, placing definite response requirements on FWS. Specifically, FWS must issue an initial finding as to whether the petition “presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted.” 16 U.S.C. §1533(b)(3)(A). FWS must make this initial finding “[t]o the maximum extent practicable, within 90 days after receiving the petition.” Id. Petitioners need not demonstrate that listing is warranted, rather, petitioners must only present information demonstrating that such listing may be warranted. While petitioners believe that the best available science demonstrates that listing the white-tailed ptarmigan as threatened is in fact warranted, there can be no reasonable dispute that the available information indicates that listing the species as threatened may be warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • And a Host List of These Parasites
    Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 74:315–337 (2007) A check list of the helminths of guineafowls (Numididae) and a host list of these parasites K. JUNKER and J. BOOMKER* Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa ABSTRACT JUNKER, K. & BOOMKER, J. 2007. A check list of the helminths of guineafowls (Numididae) and a host list of these parasites. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 74:315–337 Published and personal records have been compiled into a reference list of the helminth parasites of guineafowls. Where data on other avian hosts was available these have been included for complete- ness’ sake and to give an indication of host range. The parasite list for the Helmeted guineafowls, Numida meleagris, includes five species of acanthocephalans, all belonging to a single genus, three trematodes belonging to three different genera, 34 cestodes representing 15 genera, and 35 nema- todes belonging to 17 genera. The list for the Crested guineafowls, Guttera edouardi, contains a sin- gle acanthocephalan together with 10 cestode species belonging to seven genera, and three nema- tode species belonging to three different genera. Records for two cestode species from genera and two nematode species belonging to a single genus have been found for the guineafowl genus Acryllium. Of the 70 helminths listed for N. meleagris, 29 have been recorded from domestic chick- ens. Keywords: Acanthocephalans, cestodes, check list, guineafowls, host list, nematodes, trematodes INTRODUCTION into the southern Mediterranean region several mil- lennia before turkeys and hundreds of years before Guineafowls (Numididae) originated on the African junglefowls from which today’s domestic chickens continent, and with the exception of an isolated pop- were derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration of Willow Ptarmigan in Arctic Alaska’
    Migration of Willow Ptarmigan in Arctic Alaska’ LAURENCEIRVING, GEORGE C. WEST, LEONARD J. PEYTON, AND SIMON PANEAK2 ABSTRACT.Willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus) migrate southward in autumn through Anaktuvuk Pass in the Brooks Range of Alaska and move northward in late winter to their principal nesting grounds on the arctic slope. In the morphologically homogeneous populationfour categories were distinguished-adult and juvenile males, adult and juvenile females-month by month at three localities. Adult males pre- ponderate in winter in their northern range, a large proportion ofjuveniie males winter at Anaktuvuk, and females preponderate in the southern wintering range. Each age- sex category moves according to its own programand flocks change composition. R6SUM6. Migration du lagopade des saules duns 1’Alaska arctique. A l’automne, le lagoptde des saules(Lagopus lagopus) migre versle sud par la passe d’Anaktuvuk,dans la chaine de Brooks, Alaska; 8 la fin de l’hiver, il revient versle nord jusqu’8 ses principaux terrains de nichte situts sur le versant arctique. Dam une population morphologiquement domogtne, on a distingut, mois par mois, en trois localitb difftrentes, quatre cattgoriea h’individus - mlles adultes, mlles juvtniles, femelles adultes et femelles juvtniles. En diver, les mlles adultes l’emportent en nombre dans le nord de l’aire de migration: une hrande proportion des mslles juveniles hivernent 8 Anaktuvuk: les femelles l’emportent gans le sud de I’aire d’hivernage. Chacunede ces cattgories d’gge et desexe se dtplace selon son propre programme et la composition des bandes Cvolue en cons6quence. PESIOME. Muzpaywl 6wii xyponamxu e apxmuuecxoii A~mxe.Benaa KYPO- IIBTKB.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Species: Southern White-Tailed Ptarmigan (Lagopus Leucurus Altipetens) 2. Status: Table 1 Summarizes the Current Status
    1. Species: Southern White-tailed Ptarmigan (Lagopus leucurus altipetens) 2. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this species or subspecies by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Lagopus leucurus altipetens Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G5 Species is Secure At very low risk or extinction or elimination due to a very extensive range, abundant populations or occurrences, and little to no concern from declines or threats. CNHP S4 Species is Apparently Secure At fairly low risk of extinction or elimination due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors. Colorado SGCN, Tier 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need State List Status USDA Forest R2 Sensitive Region 2 Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species Service USDI FWSb Under Review Currently under FWS review subsequent to a positive 90-day finding. a Colorado Natural Heritage Program. b US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. The 2012 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule defines Species of Conservation Concern (SCC) as “a species, other than federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, that is known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species' capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area” (36 CFR 219.9). This overview was developed to summarize information relating to this species’ consideration to be listed as a SCC on the Rio Grande National Forest, and to aid in the development of plan components and monitoring objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Willow Ptarmigan
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences May 2008 13 Willow Ptarmigan Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "13 Willow Ptarmigan" (2008). Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard. 15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Willow Ptarmigan Lugopus /agopus (Linnaeus) 1758 OTHER VERNACULAR NAMES dLASKA ptarmigan, Alexander ptarmigan, Allen ptarmigan, Arctic grouse, red grouse (Scotland form), Scottish grouse, white grouse, white-shafted ptarmigan, willow grouse, willow partridge. RANGE Circumpolar. In North America from northern Alaska, Banks Island, Melville Island, Victoria Island, Boothia Peninsula, Southampton Island, Baffin Island, and central Greenland south to the Alaska Peninsula, south- eastern Alaska, central British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Mani- toba, central Ontario, central Quebec, and Newfoundland (ex A.O.U. Check-list). NORTH AMERICAN SUBSPECIES (ex A. 0.U. Check-list) L. I. albus (Gmelin): Keewatin willow ptarmigan. Breeds from northern Yukon, northwestern and central Mackenzie, northeastern Manitoba, *-+209++ northern Ontario, and south central Quebec south to central British Col- umbia, northern Alberta and northern Saskatchewan, and the Gulf of St.
    [Show full text]