*List of US Members to the Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

U.S. Members of ICC Commission on Arbitration & ADR UNITED STATES COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 2018 U.S Members SURNAME NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION Astigarraga José I. REED SMITH LLP Global Co-Head oF International NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT Baker C. Mark Arbitration LLP - HOUSTON QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Bennett Fred G. Partner, Head oF Arbitration & SULLIVAN, LLP Bermann George A. ProFessor oF Law COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL Bond Stephen R. Senior OF Counsel FOLEY HOAG LLP - Brennan Janis H. Partner WASHINGTON Chao Cedric C. Partner DLA PIPER - SAN FRANCISCO Senior Counsel; Chartered Craig William Laurence ORRICK Arbitrator SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, Dasteel JeFFrey Partner MEAGHER & FLOM LLP DuFFy James P. Partner BAKER MCKENZIE DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON - Friedman Mark W. Patner NEW YORK Fucci Frederick R. Partner TROUTMAN SANDERS - NY CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & Goldsmith Aren Senior Associate HAMILTON - PARIS SHEARMAN & STERLING - Greenblatt Jonathan L. Partner WASHINGTON BAKER & MCKENZIE - NEW Hanessian Grant Partner YORK ARNOLD & PORTER LLP - LOS Huebner David Partner ANGELES Kalicki Jean E. Partner KALICKI ARBITRATION SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP - NEW Kimmelman Louis B. Partner YORK Kirby JenniFer Founder KIRBY ARBITRATION Lowe John Arbitrator LOWE ARBITRATION Morril Mark President MORRILADR LLC Mouawad Caline Partner KING & SPALDING LLP - NY U.S. Members oF ICC Commission on Arbitration & ADR Committee Page 2 oF 2 SURNAME NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION O'Naghten Luis M. Partner BAKER & MCKENZIE - MIAMI FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, Polebaum Elliot E. Partner SHRIVER & JACOBSON Reichert Douglas Attorney-at-Law ETUDE REICHEIRT Reid Natalie Partner DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP Roesser John D. Partner DECHERT LLP Salans Carl F. Arbitrator INDEPENDANT LATHAM & WATKINS - NEW Salomon Claudia T. Partner YORK Schaner Lawrence Partner JENNER & BLOCK LLP Schwartz Eric A. Arbitrator SCHWARTZ ARBITRATION Seppälä Christopher R. Partner WHITE & CASE LLP - PARIS Sherwin Peter Partner PROSKAUER ROSE LLP - NY Sicard- Sole Practitioner & Adjunct JoseFa FORDHAM UNIVERSITY Mirabal ProFessor Counsel, International Disputes EXXON MOBIL GLOBAL Sikora Tom Group SERVICES COMPANY SIMPSON THACHER & Smit Robert H. Partner BARTLETT - NY SHERMAN & HOWARD - Smith Stephen E. Member oF the Firm DENVER Smith Steven L. Partner JONES DAY - SAN FRANCISCO SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS - Von Mehren George M. Partner CLEVELAND GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Whitesell Anne-Marie ProFesor and Director LAW CENTER SHERMAN & HOWARD - Wilson David B. Partner DENVER CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, Wolrich Peter Managing Partner COLT & MOSLE - PARIS .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

WTR 1000 Preview: the Global Legal Powerhouses
Feature By Nicholas Richardson, Mary Hawkins and Simon Messenger WTR 1000 preview: the global legal powerhouses The next edition of the World Trademark Review 1000, owners when selecting legal counsel close to home, as well as in often released in January 2014, comprehensively unfamiliar and challenging jurisdictions. With many brand owners focusing on key regional markets, the identifies the world’s leading trademark firms listings for the 2014 guide have been grouped on a regional basis. In and practitioners. In this preview, exclusive to advance of publication of the 2014 edition, the tables in this article WTR subscribers, we identify the firms which have reveal those firms which have achieved a listing in more than one achieved a listing in more than one region, as well region, as well as those which are home to the largest number of as those which are home to the largest numbers of independently recommended practitioners. The variety of firms included reflects the health of the trademark independently recommended practitioners marketplace and the diverse needs of clients and those law firms referring work onwards. The WTR 1000 is thus an essential guide in strong brand is vital to success in today’s intensely today’s brand-focused economy. competitive and increasingly globalised market. Trademarks are key tools through which businesses Adams & Adams can protect the goodwill and reputation inherent in Recommended in regions: 1 A their brands, and build and maintain demand for Recommended individuals: 8 their products and services. External advisers play a crucial role in developing and implementing brand strategies for both local and South African IP titan Adams & Adams has eight individuals international markets, and in protecting these vital assets in the face recommended in the WTR 1000 2014 – one of the highest numbers of infringement.
[Show full text]
Just and Accountable Development
Just and Accountable Development 2014 Annual Report & 2015 Review 38 COUNTRIES ISLP at Work 3 170 PROJECTS Letter from the Co-Presidents 4 Letter from the Executive Director 5 Natural Resources 6 Vulnerable Communities 6 Case Study: Kenya’s Kerio Valley 7 Investment, Trade & Tax 8 Economic & Social Development 8 Case Study: Liberia Boosts Small Businesses 9 Strengthening Media Freedoms 10 Supporting Civil Society 11 Law Firms and Barristers’ 57 Chambers Partnerships 12 LAW FIRMS Awards & Publications 12 Volunteers 13 10 LANGUAGES Donors 14 Financial Statements 14 Board of Directors and Staff 15 22,000 Law Firm Donors 16 PRO BONO HOURS 2 A GLOBAL IMPACT ISLP at Work ISLP’s mission is to foster just and accountable development which is sustainable, supportive of human rights, and strengthens the rule of law, by mobilizing our unique network of highly skilled and experienced pro bono lawyers to advise civil society and governments. NATURAL VULNERABLE CIVIL SOCIETY 25 RESOURCES COMMUNITIES SPACE COUNTRIES WITH ONSITE MISSIONS ECONOMIC ANTI- INVESTMENT, & SOCIAL CORRUPTION TRADE & TAX $9.5m DEVELOPMENT IN DONATED SERVICES 3 LETTERS Letter from the “ We cannot thank enough those of our many friends for generously Letter from the providing the financial, service, and moral support to permit us to Co-Presidents realize our dream.” Co-Presidents Dear Friends, would have worked in some 60 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe; and that we would have a widely–recognized record As the 2014 Annual Report goes to press, ISLP has completed a comprehensive strategic of significant accomplishment.
[Show full text]
Dentons, Pedersoli E Macfarlanes Nel Bond Di Ylda
Dentons Europe Studio Legale Tributario Piazza degli Affari 1 20123 Milano Italia 大成 Salans FMC SNR Denton McKenna Long dentons.com COMUNICATO STAMPA DENTONS, PEDERSOLI E MACFARLANES NEL BOND DI YLDA Milano - Torino, 22 febbraio 2021. Lo studio legale Dentons è stato advisor del consorzio costituito da Idinvest Partners SA e Green Arrow Capital SGR S.p.A., società di gestione del fondo Green Arrow Private Debt Fund, nell’emissione di un prestito obbligazionario non convertibile garantito da parte di Ylda S.p.A., capogruppo operativa nel settore del portable toilet rental, per un ammontare complessivo di 45 milioni di euro. Per Dentons ha agito un team multi-giurisdizionale coordinato dai partner Alessandro Fosco Fagotto e Gianpaolo Garofalo, e composto dal counsel Edoardo Galeotti e dalle associate Bianca Chiara Sinisi e Giulia Caselli Maldonado, nonché dal partner Jacqueline Bell e dalla associate Holly Quirke per alcuni aspetti di diritto inglese e dal partner Max Philippe e dal senior associate Steeve Jaskierowicz per gli aspetti di diritto francese. L’emittente è stata assistita da Pedersoli Studio Legale con un team composto dall’equity partner Marcello Magro e dagli associate Vittoria Deregibus e Riccardo Monge per i profili capital markets e dall’equity partner Ascanio Cibrario con il counsel Luca Rossi Provesi e gli associate Edoardo Augusto Bononi e Giancarlo Maniglio per i profili corporate di diritto italiano, nonché dallo studio Macfarlanes per gli aspetti di diritto inglese con il partner Jatinder Bains, il senior solicitor Chris Barrett e il solicitor Timothy Bromley- White. Segui Dentons Italia Contatti: Dentons Europe Studio Legale Tributario Image Building Daniela Morante - Business Development Tel.
[Show full text]
Intelligence Report
Foreign law firms Intelligence report The new legal architects In the wake of the financial storm, which international law firms are taking the lead in designing and executing India’s cross-border transactions? George W Russell investigates June 2010 India Business Law Journal 33 Intelligence report Foreign law firms aw firms working on India deals have managed “Tariffs have to be more competitive and arrangements a collective sigh of relief. The outlook for India- have to be more creative, such as blended rates, maxi- related legal work is brighter than it has ever mum lump sum fees and success fees,” says Isabelle Lbeen since the global financial downturn took Roux-Chenu, director and group general counsel at hold late in 2008. “India related work has increased at a Capgemini in Paris. faster pace over the last year as India was not as badly affected by the downturn compared to the other devel- Intensive research oped economies and other economies in the region,” says Manoj Bhargava, who leads the India practice at This year’s India Business Law Journal survey of the Jones Day in Singapore. major international firms undertaking India work is Law firms also welcomed the results of the Indian drawn from an analysis of about 500 law firms from general election in mid-2009. However, some aspects of every continent and the matters they have handled government policy are causing concern. “The aggres- over the past 12 months. While no survey can be 100% sive nature of the India tax authorities is troubling to for- objective, India Business Law Journal has endeav- eign investors, and consequently has an adverse effect oured to draw insightful conclusions from the intensive on the willingness of foreign companies to be active in research undertaken.
[Show full text]
Law Firm Mergers: a Tasty Concoction?
Law firm mergers: a tasty concoction? Introduction The much heralded impact of deregulation has been making waves in the legal industry for a couple of years now, with the introduction of Alternative Business Structures creating new competition in the industry and causing existing law firms to take a step back and examine their next strategic move in light of these market changes. Amidst all this change, few law firms have considered how their brands are affected and can be utilised to help them develop a competitive edge in this new legal landscape. Intangible Business brought this issue to the industry’s attention back in September 2012, when it issued a report comparing law firm brands to chocolate bar brands. The light-hearted campaign encouraged law firms and legal commentators to suggest which law firm brands best resembled which chocolate brands. It highlighted the important message that in this brave new world, law firms needed to wise up to the value and potential their brands could hold if they were to compete with heavyweight consumer brands entering the market for the first time. Since then, a flurry of law firm mergers have been announced as the legal market consolidates in response to the changes. The process of bringing two or more firms’ brands together to create one enticing brand proposition is similar to how mixologists capitalise on individual spirits and mixers to create cocktails. Intangible Business has used this concept to invite the legal industry to compare the big law firm mergers to cocktails to highlight the brand management issues at stake when law firms enter into merger negotiations.
[Show full text]
Private Antitrust Litigation in 27 Jurisdictions Worldwide Contributing Editor: Samantha Mobley 2010
® GCRGLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW Private Antitrust Litigation in 27 jurisdictions worldwide Contributing editor: Samantha Mobley 2010 Published by Getting The Deal Through in association with: Anderson Mo¯ri & Tomotsune Baker & McKenzie LLP Barretto Ferreira, Kujawski, Brancher e Gonçalves – Sociedade de Advogados (BKBG) Bell Gully Boekel De Nerée CHSH Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati CHSH Gilescu & Partenerii / Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs Inc Hausfeld & Co LLP Law Offices Panagopoulos, Vainanidis, Schina, Economou Linklaters LLP Maclay Murray & Spens LLP Mannheimer Swartling Marques Mendes & Associados Matheson Ormsby Prentice Mayer Brown LLP McMillan LLP Roschier, Attorneys Ltd Salans SimmonsCooper Partners SJ Berwin LLP Vasil Kisil & Partners CONTenTS ® Private Antitrust Introduction Anthony Maton and Scott Campbell Hausfeld & Co LLP 3 Litigation 2010 Austria Bernhard Kofler-Senoner and Hasan Inetas CHSH Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati 8 Contributing editor: Belgium Françoise Lefevre, Johan Ysewyn and John Biart Linklaters LLP 13 Samantha Mobley Baker & McKenzie LLP Brazil Paulo Brancher Barretto Ferreira, Kujawski, Brancher e Gonçalves – Business development manager Sociedade de Advogados (BKBG) 18 Joseph Samuel Canada David Kent, Martin Low QC, Eric Vallières, and Jonathan Hood McMillan LLP 24 Marketing managers Alan Lee Czech Republic Lucie Bányaiová Salans 29 Dan Brennan George Ingledew England & Wales Samantha Mobley, Keith Jones and Francesca Richmond Edward Perugia
[Show full text]
Winners List Winners List
AI LEGAL AWARDS 2011 AI LEGAL AWARDS 2011 WINNERS LIST WINNERS LIST Argentina Germany Malta Thailand Brons & Salas Corporate Tax Law Firm of the Year Gaßner, Groth, Siederer & Coll Public Sector Firm of the Year Camilleri Preziosi Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year Thanathip & Partners M&A Law Firm of the Year Mitrani Caballero Rosso Alba Francia Ojam & Patents Law Firm of the Year Meyer Koering Franchise Law Firm of the Year The Cayman Islands Ruiz Moreno Abogados GSK Stockmann + Kollegen Investment Funds Law Firm of the Year Mauritius Offshore Law Firm of the Year Conyers Dill & Pearman M&A Law Firm of the Year Jonas Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH Trade Marks Law Firm of the Year Uteem Chambers Australia Corporate Law Firm of the Year Solomon Harris Banking & Finance Law Firm of the Year Buntscheck Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH EU Law Firm of the Year Erriah Chambers Colin Biggers & Paisley Insurance and Reinsurance Law Firm of the Solomon Harris Capital Markets Law Firm of the Year Heussen Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH Property Law Firm of the Year Year Mexico Appleby Corporate Law Firm of the Year Avocado rechtsanwälte Administrative & Public Law Firm of the Year Regulatory Communications Law Firm of the Henry Davis York Capital Markets Law Firm of the Year Page 3 Casares Castelazo Frías y Zárate Graef Rechtsanwälte Entertainment Law Firm of the Year Year The Czech Republic Minter Ellison Competition Law Firm of the Year Graf von Westphalen Real Estate Law Firm of the Year Structured Finance Law Firm of the Year bpv Braun Partners Banking and Finance Law Firm of the Year Minter Ellison Dispute Resolution Law Firm of the Year Nader, Hayaux & Goebel Raue LLP Energy Regulation Law Firm of the Year CMS Cameron McKenna v.o.s.
[Show full text]
The Doctrine of Treaties Providing For" Objective Regimes"
THE DOCTRINE OF TREATIES PROVIDING FOR “OBJECTIVE REGIMES” Thesis submitted to folfil the requirement for the Ph.D. Degree By Mohammed Jafar GHANBARIJAHROMI UNIVERSITY OF LONDON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON *** March, 1996 *** ProQuest Number: 10045492 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10045492 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The object of this study is to examine the doctrine of treaties providing for “ob jective regimes”, which postulates that there exists a certain category of treaties which, by their very nature, create legal rights and obligations for States not party to them re gardless of the generally accepted principle pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt. The main purposes of the study are to determine whether or not this doctrine forms part of the modem law of treaties and, if it does, to determine its content and scope. In this way, it should be possible to clarify the extent to which treaties may produce rights and obligations. The study consists of Five chapters. Chapter I furnishes a general overview of the historical development of the doctrine of treaties providing for “objective regimes”, so that the kind of treaties which allegedly fall within the scope of this doctrine may more easily be identified.
[Show full text]
Arbitration in 55 Jurisdictions Worldwide Contributing Editors: Gerhard Wegen and Stephan Wilske 2011
® The international journal of gacommercial and treaty arbitratiron Arbitration in 55 jurisdictions worldwide Contributing editors: Gerhard Wegen and Stephan Wilske 2011 Published by Global arbitration review in association with: Anderson Mo¯ri & Tomotsune The international journal of gApplebyacommercial and treaty arbitratiron AZB & Partners Badri and Salim El Meouchi Law Firm LLP Bell Dewar Inc Bonn Schmitt Steichen Bredin Prat Brodermann & Jahn Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH Carlos Aguiar, Ferreira de Lima & Associados,RL Cavelier Abogados Clifford Chance Conway & Partners, Advocaten & Attorneys-at-law Dittmar & Indrenius Drakopoulos Law Firm Dr Colin Ong Legal Services, Advocates & Solicitors Esin Law Firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer George Etomi & Partners Gleiss Lutz Gregoriou & Associates Law Offices Habib Al Mulla & Co Hamilton Abogados Harris Kyriakides LLC Hausmaninger Kletter Rechstanwälte Hedman Partners Herbert Smith CIS LLP Heussen Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH HM Ooi Associates Hoet Pelaez Castillo & Duque Hogan Lovells US LLP Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Jiménez Cruz Peña Karanovic´ & Nikolic´ Kettani Law Firm Kim & Chang Kimathi & Kimathi, Corporate Attorneys Kosheri, Rashed & Riad Lalive Laszczuk & Partners Law Offices Be˘lohla´vek Law Office Skrastins un Dzenis L O Baptista Advogados Mkono & Co Advocates in association with SNR Denton Motieka & Audzeviccius Nordia Advokatfirma Norton Rose (Middle East) LLP Oscós Abogados Pestalozzi Salans LLP Sandart & Partners Sherby & Co, Advs Stikeman Elliott LLP Tilleke & Gibbins
[Show full text]
Distinguished Writing Awards Honorary Board of Directors Category: Law Firms William C
THE BURTON AWARDS THE TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY THE LAW360 DISTINGUISHED LEGAL WRITING AWARDS IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, PRESENTED BY LEAD SPONSOR LAW360, AND CO-SPONSORED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Specifics of the 2019 Burton Awards Program The 20th annual national awards will be held on Monday, May 20, 2019 at the Library of Congress. The Burton Awards: An Established Tradition in Law The Burton Awards program is run in association with the Library of Congress. The non-profit event is held each year to honor distinguished writers and recognize leaders in law, including those counsel belonging to America’s most prestigious law firms. Patterned after the Pulitzers, the program has become one of the most prominent and dynamic awards programs in law. While the emphasis is on writing, the program is also geared towards rewarding legal achievement in many other areas of law. For example, awards are also given to general counsel for their distinguished careers in law, and even to lawyers in the military. Prior Renowned Guest Speakers Above left: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg eulogizes U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016. Above right: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor discusses her “Book of the Year in Law” winning memoir with Bill Press. Below left: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer speaks with Bill Press, CNN commentator and Burton Awards Master of Ceremonies. Below right: Prior “Book of the Year” Award winner U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (retired) joins guests for cocktail reception after being interviewed at the Program.
[Show full text]
Transforming Lives Together 19 2018/ About the D.C
Lives Together Lives Transforming Annual 2018/19 Report About the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center 4 No matter who we are or where Message from Our Executive Director and Pro Bono we come from, we belong to a Committee Chair 4 Our Services: Representation Clinics & Projects 6 community. When you see the Feature: Helping Tenants When and Where They Most elderly with walkers lining up Need It 8 an hour before a free legal clinic Our Services: Saturday Neighborhood Clinics 10 Feature: Pro Bono Defenders Help Tenants Secure Justice 12 opens, you can feel how much Our Services: D.C. Superior Court Resource Centers 14 need exists in our community Feature: A Hopeful Nonprofit Gets the Help It Needs to Succeed 16 and how much people depend on Our Services: Nonprofit & Small Business Legal Assistance pro bono attorneys to help with Programs 18 Feature: Connecting Small Business Owners with Corporate critical legal issues in their lives. Counsel 20 Feature: Meeting the Challenges of On-Boarding Employees 22 Our Services: Resources & Training 24 - Esther Lim Our Financials 26 2018/2019 D.C. Bar President welcome Our Leadership 27 Participating Firms & Organizations 28 Our Donors 30 About the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center The D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center is the largest provider of pro bono legal help in the District of Columbia. Each year, we serve more than 20,000 individuals, nonprofits, and small businesses. D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center With the support of our generous donors and more than 1,500 dedicated attorney volunteers, we operate award- Executive Director winning legal clinics, projects, and resource centers where and when the community most needs our help.
[Show full text]
INTA 2009 131Th ANNUAL MEETING Registration List As of June 26, 2009
INTA 2009 131th ANNUAL MEETING Page 1 of 133 Registration List as of June 26, 2009 * A registration must be received and processed by the date mentioned above to be included HOTEL NAME FIRM LOCATION Deanna Aamodt Thomson Reuters: West Eagan, MN, United States THEW Kristine Aarflot Bryn Aarflot AS Oslo, Norway Gail Abbas Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP Palo Alto, CA, United States Karen Abbott Bodyworks Huntington Beach, CA, United States SHER Abdelgadir Abdalla Taha Saud M.A. Shawwaf Law Office (SMAS) Riyadh, Saudi Arabia WEST Maha Abdel-Majeed IP Matters Co. Ltd. Amman, Jordan Abdul Jabbar Abdul Aziz Alpha & Co. (IP) Doha, Qatar SHER Sally M. Abel Fenwick & West LLP Mountain View, CA, United States Victor Abente Stewart Abente Stewart - Abogados Asuncion, Paraguay Karen Abraham Shearn Delamore & Co. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia LION Richard Abraham Maguire Boss Cambridge, United Kingdom SHER Tsan Abrahamson Cobalt LLP Berkeley, CA, United States SHER Andrew Abrams Fish & Richardson P.C. San Diego, CA, United States OLIV Ewa Abrams Tiffany & Co. New York, NY, United States Jim Abramson Paxfire Sterling, VA, United States Sascha Abrar Siebeke Lange Wilbert Dusseldorf, Germany GRND Steve Abreu Bromberg & Sunstein LLP Boston, MA, United States Veronica Abreu eBay Inc. San Jose, CA, United States CRWN Jamal Abu Ghaida AraMarks IP Doha, Qatar SHER Luay T. Abu-Ghazaleh Abu-Ghazaleh Intellectual Property (AGIP) Amman, Jordan Motasem Abu-Ghazeleh Abu-Ghazaleh Intellectual Property (AGIP) Amman, Jordan Ridab Abu-Taleb Abu-Ghazaleh Intellectual Property (AGIP) Shanghai, China Ahsna Acharya Gujarat University Gujarat, India Nigamnarayan Acharya Gardner Groff Greenwald & Villanueva, Atlanta, GA, United States P.C.
[Show full text]