DOCSLIB.ORG

Intelligence Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intelligence Report Foreign law firms Intelligence report The new legal architects In the wake of the financial storm, which international law firms are taking the lead in designing and executing India’s cross-border transactions? George W Russell investigates June 2010 India Business Law Journal 33 Intelligence report Foreign law firms aw firms working on India deals have managed “Tariffs have to be more competitive and arrangements a collective sigh of relief. The outlook for India- have to be more creative, such as blended rates, maxi- related legal work is brighter than it has ever mum lump sum fees and success fees,” says Isabelle Lbeen since the global financial downturn took Roux-Chenu, director and group general counsel at hold late in 2008. “India related work has increased at a Capgemini in Paris. faster pace over the last year as India was not as badly affected by the downturn compared to the other devel- Intensive research oped economies and other economies in the region,” says Manoj Bhargava, who leads the India practice at This year’s India Business Law Journal survey of the Jones Day in Singapore. major international firms undertaking India work is Law firms also welcomed the results of the Indian drawn from an analysis of about 500 law firms from general election in mid-2009. However, some aspects of every continent and the matters they have handled government policy are causing concern. “The aggres- over the past 12 months. While no survey can be 100% sive nature of the India tax authorities is troubling to for- objective, India Business Law Journal has endeav- eign investors, and consequently has an adverse effect oured to draw insightful conclusions from the intensive on the willingness of foreign companies to be active in research undertaken. the India marketplace,” warns Paul de Bernier, co-head As well as soliciting hundreds of submissions from of the India practice group at Mayer Brown in London. candidate law firms, we have combed through public Another set of concerns relates to arbitration and liti- and other records and consulted both domestic and gation in India and the ability to seek effective enforce- international lawyers, as well as corporate counsel in ment of contractual remedies in the country. “The open- India and overseas. ing of a new branch of the London Court of International Like last year, India Business Law Journal identifies the Arbitration in Delhi may alter the way we approach top 10 international firms for India work. In addition, we litigation and arbitration in the US-India context,” says have listed 15 firms that are considered key players in Valérie Demont, a partner at Pepper Hamilton in New the burgeoning business of India-related legal services. York. We have classified another 15 firms as significant play- Law firms should note that since the downturn, clients ers. There are another 40 “firms to watch”, which can be say they have become more price-conscious when it expected to continue attracting India-related work. comes to choosing law firms for India-related work. As more regional and local firms, especially in key IBJL-FT Partnership ad 183x132 - June 10:Layout 1 22/06/2010 15:04 Page 1 Proudly supporting infrastructure and commercial developments in the Subcontinent, © Pinsent Masons LLP 2010 Asia and Middle East for over 30 years Pinsent Masons is a full service international law firm and the Number One law firm for construction expertise worldwide (Who's Who Legal 2008-2010) Find out more at www.pinsentmasons.com or contact: Sachin Kerur T: +971 4 373 9600 E: [email protected] Martin Harman T: +44 (0)20 7490 6215 E: [email protected] LONDON DUBAI BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG SINGAPORE 34 India Business Law Journal June 2010 Foreign law firms Intelligence report economies such as Singapore and Australia, attract Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, while Sidley Austin lost India work it seemed only fair to give them a separate Arun Nigam and Nishrin Hussain when both of them category. So this year, we identify 20 firms based in nine formed Arun Nigam Associates in Hong Kong. jurisdictions that have attracted considerable India- Meanwhile, White & Case partner Doug Peel saw his focused work. focus move away from India as he was rushed from In addition to the top 100, this year we present two Singapore to Abu Dhabi to shore up the firm’s Middle more lists: one highlights 10 niche firms that special- East practice after a spate of departures. Ashurst ize in a range of matters, such as offshore structuring, partner Andrew Edge remained in London, but moved intellectual property and immigration (see Boutique to Stephenson Harwood. (Ashurst is also undertaking boom on page 45), and the other focuses on players India work without its Delhi liaison office, which closed hoping to break into the Indian market (see Knocking on in February after a Bombay High Court ruling). India’s door page 43). These diverse law firms – some from unexpected jurisdictions reflecting the potential The top 10 firms reordering of global markets – are 10 we believe show promise for the future. Our top 10 sees three new entrants this year: Linklaters, As in previous years, the top 100 firms hail mostly Mayer Brown and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. Clients from the US and England. However, firms from major praise Simpson Thacher for its cross-border and trading partners (and Commonwealth allies) such as India experience. “They are our trusted advisers who Canada, Australia and Singapore are also recognized, can bring international rigour and business judgment as are those from civil-law jurisdictions such as France, to bear on complicated legal situations,” says Karan Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Swani, a principal at Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co (KKR) in Mumbai. The firm advised KKR and the Canada Global vision, Indian ambition Pension Plan Investment Board in connection with their US$255 million secondary equity investment in Aricent While London, New York, Washington, Singapore and and purchase of a note receivable held by Flextronics Hong Kong remain the dominant locations for India- International. focused lawyers, other centres are vying for a piece of Mayer Brown advised Mérieux Alliance in the €550 the India pie. Linklaters, for example, has a London- million (US$676 million) sale of Shantha Biotechnics, based India practice and also an India desk in São Paulo the India-based bio-pharmaceutical company, to Sanofi led by Christian Roschmann, head of corporate finance Pasteur, a subsidiary of Sanofi-Aventis. It also advised practice at Lefosse Advogados, the firm’s Brazilian National Stock Exchange in a first-of-its-kind cross- associated firm. Similarly, at Baker Hostetler, Monica listing agreement with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Verma, a Cleveland partner, with the assistance of Neal and represented City & Guilds, one of the largest exami- Seth, a partner in Washington, heads efforts to develop nation and accreditation organizations in the world, on the firm’s India-related practice. a joint venture with the Manipal Group of India to pro- The India-related legal industry is now truly glo- vide vocational and standardized education services in bal. Recent major deals involved firms as diverse as India. Julius & Creasy in Colombo (Sri Lankan acquisitions Linklaters advised Suzlon Energy on the consent by Bharti Airtel), Corpus Legal in Lusaka and Mason solicitation for US$500 million in convertible bonds and Hayes & Curran in Dublin (Vedanta’s purchase of mines the restructuring of various debt facilities. It also advised in Zambia and Ireland), Kojima Law Offices in Tokyo Oman Oil on equity investment in its joint venture with (Japanese anti-dumping claims) and Pham & Associates Bharat Petroleum Corporation, and represented Zain in in Hanoi (enforcing Indian trademark and licensing the US$10.7 billion disposal of its African business to rights in Vietnam). Bharti Airtel. While these firms might not yet be among our top 100, Pinsent Masons has been involved directly with their presence among India-related transactions reflects the increased levels of interest shown both by foreign companies in India and Indian clients’ interest in invest- The top 10 firms* ing in the wider world. Allen & Overy Movers and shakers Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton While some firms have moved up the rankings, others Clifford Chance have moved down. This does not necessarily reflect a Davis Polk & Wardwell change in abilities as in most cases it is usually brought on by external factors such as market conditions. The Jones Day global financial downturn that began in 2008 brought ini- Linklaters tial public offerings (IPOs) to a screeching halt. Several firms have yet to fully recover. The mergers and acquisi- Mayer Brown tions market has also softened, although it is making a Pinsent Masons notable return, while restructuring has boomed. Firms have also been affected – positively or nega- Shearman & Sterling tively in terms of India practice groups – by personnel Simpson Thacher & Bartlett changes. Robert Nelson switched his significant India practice in California from Winston & Strawn to Akin * Listed alphabetically June 2010 India Business Law Journal 35 Intelligence report Foreign law firms It’s all about building relationships... and making these connections work for you Kelley Drye’s India Practice is the leader in As a global law firm, we facilitate highly Kelley Drye has been highlighted for a fostering and advising international clients collaborative connections across all borders. second time in India Business Law Journal’s in their Indian business relationships, as well We focus on fostering a close cooperation list of “Top 10 Law Firms” of 2010. as extensively advising Indian businesses in with our clients on all legal and business Founded in 1836, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP issues. In today’s economy more than the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ?Mckenna Long?????Dentons??????
    ?McKenna Long?????Dentons?????? Consolidation at the top of the global legal industry is showing no signs of stopping with the confirmation that Dentons, fresh off its last big international tie-up, wants to again walk down the aisle — this time with U.S.-bound McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP. Denton's potential addition of the Atlanta-based, 575-lawyer McKenna Long would add a significant new branch to Dentons' growing international structure, which now includes about 2,500 lawyers in 50 countries. If completed, the merger would bring Dentons to a top-three spot in the industry by size, with about 3,100 lawyers. In McKenna Long, Dentons would acquire a well-regarded but somewhat undifferentiated general services firm with solid roots in government contracts, established offices in a handful of major U.S. markets, a network of Washington contacts and no significant international profile. Among its more notable offerings is the firm's intellectual property and technology practice led by D.C.- and Seoul-based partner Song Jung, which has done considerable work for Korean tech giant LG Corp., among others. The addition of McKenna Long "adds to [Dentons'] capacities in D.C. and Los Angeles and San Francisco,” said firm management consultant Eric Seeger, a principal at legal consultant firm Altman Weil Inc. "They already had Chicago, and it gives them a large Atlanta office." For the McKenna Long partners now considering the deal, joining Dentons would immediately vault them from an increasingly squeezed U.S. middle tier into a global network with a slew of multinational clients, but one that is likely still experiencing growing pains from repeated cross-border mergers, experts say.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Lawyers 2016
    INNOVATIVE LAWYERS 2016 OCTOBER62016 FT.COM/INNOVATIVE-LAWYERS RESEARCH PARTNER SUPPORTEDBY Foreword Innovations abound with Europe in flux INNOVATIVE LAWYERS 2016 This editionofFTInnovativeLawyers, our11th, appears at a OCTOBER 62016 time of upheaval across thecontinent.Two bigconundrumsfor FT.COM/INNOVATIVE-LAWYERS thecitizens, businesses andinstitutionsofEuropewill test the foresightand ingenuityoflegal professionalsfor yearstocome: theaftermath of theUKvoteonJune23toleave theEU, and theintensifyingrefugee andmigrant crisis.Inthismagazine, we show howlawyers arealready innovating to address both (Brexit, page 8; Social Responsibility,page12). Thebusiness worldasseenthrough thelensoflawyers is changing too—new industries andalliancesare erodingthe RESEARCH PARTNER SUPPORTEDBY traditionallines of competitionand separation of sectorsfaster than ever,forcinglawyers to getahead.Lawyers areresponding by creating newtypes of firms,blurring oldboundaries in EDITOR Harriet Arnold search of newsolutions.The individual lawyer,the nature of ASSISTANT EDITOR legaladviceand theway in whichthatadviceisdelivered are Josh Spero undergoing deep change. PRODUCTION EDITOR George Kyriakos In addition,there arenew centresofpower andchangein ART DIRECTOR thelegal industry:millennialsrefusingthe partnershiptrack; Kostya Penkov DESIGNERS technologistsintroducing artificialintelligence; andgeneral Harriet Thorne, Callum Tomsett counselactingasentrepreneurs, rather than just as lawyers. PICTURE EDITORS MichaelCrabtree,AlanKnox Againstthisbackdrop, theFinancial
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Chapter
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Recovery & Insolvency 2016 10th Edition A practical cross-border insight into corporate recovery and insolvency work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro Lenz & Staehelin Bojović&Partners Macfarlanes LLP BonelliErede Nishimura & Asahi Bredin Prat Olswang LLP Brian Kahn Inc. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Campbells Pinheiro Neto Advogados Dhir & Dhir Associates Roschier, Attorneys Ltd. Ferraiuoli LLC Schindler Rechtsanwälte GmbH Gall Sedgwick Chudleigh Ltd. Gilbert + Tobin Slaughter and May Gorrissen Federspiel Soteris Flourentzos & Associates LLC GRATA Law Firm LLP Strelia Hengeler Mueller Partnerschaft Sullivan & Cromwell LLP von Rechtsanwälten mbB Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP INFRALEX Uría Menéndez Kim & Chang White & Case LLP Kubas Kos Gałkowski Yonev Valkov Nenov Kvale Advokatfirma DA The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Corporate Recovery & Insolvency 2016 General Chapters: 1 An Effective Insolvency Framework Within the EU? – Tom Vickers & Megan Sparber, Slaughter and May 1 2 Developments in Directors’ Duties under English Law – Alicia Videon & Louise Bell, Olswang LLP 4 3 Liability Management as a Restructuring Tool – Chris Beatty, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 10 4 Fund Lenders: Potential New Challenges for the Next Wave of Loan Restructuring Transactions – Contributing Editor Jat Bains & Paul Keddie, Macfarlanes LLP 16 Tom Vickers, Partner, Slaughter and May Sales Director
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Workplace Disputes: Government Response to the Consultation
    Resolving Workplace Disputes: Government response to the consultation NOVEMBER 2011 Resolving Workplace Disputes - Government Response to Consultation Contents Resolving Workplace Disputes - Government Response to Consultation ...................................... 3 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 6 General response ............................................................................................................................ 7 Responses to specific questions ..................................................................................................... 8 1. Mediation (Q 1–7) ................................................................................................................... 8 2. Compromise Agreements (Q. 8–11)....................................................................................... 8 3. Early conciliation (Q. 12-20).................................................................................................... 8 4. Modernising Tribunals (Q. 21-56) ........................................................................................... 9 5. Unfair Dismissal qualification period (Q. 57-60) ..................................................................... 9 6. Financial Penalties (Q. 61-62) ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winners List 2
    M&A AWARDS 2012 Winners List Afghanistan China Rosenstock Legal Afghan M&A Law Firm of the Year PricewaterhouseCoopers Overall Financial Advisory Firm of the Year: China Albania DLA Piper Chinese Employment Law Firm of the Year E. I. HAJDINI Albanian Commercial Law Firm of the Year NYGT (Hong Kong) Limited Mid-Sized Asset Management Firm of the Year: China Argentina Rouse Chinese Intellectual Property Law Firm of Estudio Beccar Varela Argentinian M&A Law Firm of the Year the Year Salaberren & López Sansón Argentinian Cross Border Law Firm of the Year Brons & Salas Argentinian Corporate Tax Law Firm of the Year Colombia Barrios, Vélez, Gutiérrez Abogados IT Due Diligence Provider of the Year: Colombia Australia Clayton Utz Australian Full Service Law Firm of the Year Congo (Democratic Rep) Queensland Bar Chambers Australian Mining & Energy Barrister of the Year YAV & ASSOCIATES DRC M&A Law Firm of the Year Truman Hoyle Australian IT Due Diligence Law Firm of the Year Minter Ellison Overall Law Firm of the Year: Australia Costa Rica Corrs Chambers Westgarth Australian Corporate Tax Law Firm of the Year Quirós Abogados Central Law M&A Law Firm of the Year: Costa Rica Henry Davis York Australian Public M&A Law Firm of the Year Katherine Pavlidis Johnson, Mediator Australian Corporate Mediator of the Year Croatia Middletons Australian Vendor Due Diligence Law Firm Wolf Theiss Overall Law Firm of the Year: Croatia of the Year Piper Alderman Australian Legal Adviser of the year: Cyprus Beach Energy/Adelaide Energy InterQuality Cypriot Auditors of the Year Maddocks Australian Employment Law Firm of the Year Awford Legal Australian Aviation Law Firm of the Year Denmark Pacific Equity Partners Pty.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the EU Copyright Framework
    Review of the EU copyright framework European Implementation Assessment Review of the EU copyright framework: The implementation, application and effects of the "InfoSoc" Directive (2001/29/EC) and of its related instruments European Implementation Assessment Study In October 2014, the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) requested from the European Parliament Research Service (EPRS) an Ex Post Impact Assessment on Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (InfoSoc). This EPRS publication was originally commissioned in the context of JURI's own- initiative implementation report, which was adopted in Plenary in July 2015, Rapporteur Julia Reda MEP. However, it is also relevant to the work of JURI Committees' Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright (CWG), chaired by Jean Marie Cavada MEP. Furthermore, this request was made in the wider context of the Commission's review of the EU legislative framework on copyright, and the ensuing legislative proposals, which have been a long time in the planning and which are now expected for the 4th quarter of 2015. The objective of these proposals is to modernise the EU copyright framework, and in particular the InfoSoc Directive, in light of the digital transformation. Accordingly, in response to the JURI request, the Ex-Post Impact Assessment Unit of the European Parliament Research Service decided to produce a "European Implementation Assessment on the review of the EU copyright framework". Implementation reports of EP committees are now routinely accompanied by European Implementation Assessments, drawn up by the Ex-Post Impact Assessment Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the European Parliament's Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Law Practice
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 Article 10 1994 Transnational Law Practice Richard L. Abel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard L. Abel, Transnational Law Practice, 44 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 737 (1994) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol44/iss2/10 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. TRANSNATIONAL LAW PRACTICE Richard L. Abelt T RANSNATIONAL law practice has grown dramatically in recent years, but scholarship has not kept pace. This Article fills the void in three different, yet related, ways. The first section seeks to explain the patterns of transnational law practice that have emerged in recent decades. The second describes the constraints on transnational practice, especially those imposed by national and supranational regulation. I conclude with proposals about how lawyers, professional organizations, and governments should regulate transnational law practice. Since there is no comprehensive account of the growth of transnational law practice, I have appended one, drawn from a wide variety of sources, including Martindale-Hubbell, the International Financial Law Review, and Business Lawyer,' as well as a dozen interviews with lawyers in t Professor, U.C.L.A. (B.A., 1962, Harvard; LL.B., 1965, Columbia; Ph.D., 1974, London). 1. In addition to the sources cited throughout the entire article, I have benefitted from consulting a number of sources, see generally MARC GALANTER & THOMAS PALAY, TOURNAMENT OF LAWYERS: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE BIG LAW FIRM (1991); LAW FIRMS IN EUROPE (John Pritchard ed., 1992); Alice Finn, Foreign Lawyers: Regulation of Foreign Lawyers in Japan, 28 HARV.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Lawyers 2015
    InnovatIve Lawyers 2015 october 22015 ft.com/innovative-lawyers ReseaRch paRtneR suppoRted by ForeWord The first decade Welcometoalandmark edition of Innovative Lawyersmagazine. This is the10thyearofanFT specialreportthathas weighedand ranked the work of European legalorganisationsduringatimeofgreat change in the industry. In therun-uptoour first report,manyinand outsidethe profession said innovating wasnot what lawyersdid.In2006 just twoleading legalfirms expresslycited innovation as avalue on theirwebsites. Nowalmostall do. Andthe growth of theseriesofFTreports,now with threeseparateregional editions,shows howfirmsaroundthe worldhaveembracedinnovation. Theworkoflawyers wastransformed by theglobaleconomiccrisisin 2008.Theywerecalledontosteadybusinesses andgovernments,especially as bankerscameunder increasing suspicion.Thatworkisstill going on but stronger regulation in thewakeofthe crisis is also forcingmorecompliance work upon companiesaroundthe world—and they areturning tolawyers forhelp. Theincreasingtempo of change hasbeenfeltinthe structures of legal FTSpecialreporTS ediTor Leyla Boulton organisations. Mergersacross continents have become widespread in ediTor thepastdecadeand severalfirmshavemoved close to beingtruly global Rohit Jaggi producTion ediTor entities.And anylistofthe eliteofthe profession hastoinclude some US George Kyriakos firms that have made substantial inroadsintothe Europeanmarket. arTdirecTor Jonathan Saunders In theUK, theLegal Services Act2007, liberalising some areasofthe JuniordeSigner profession,has hadamuchgreater
    [Show full text]
  • High Court Judgment Template
    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 235 (Ch) INGENIOUS LITIGATION Claim Nos: HC-2015-002715, HC-2015-004581 HC-2017-000490, BL-2018-000279 BL-2018-001466, BL-2018-002554 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES BUSINESS LIST (ChD) Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 10 February 2020 Before : MR JUSTICE NUGEE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : MR NIGEL ROWE & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA HOLDINGS PLC & Others Defendants Claim Nos: HC-2015-004561, HC-2016-001674 HC-2017-001049, BL-2018-000507 And Between : MR ANTHONY BARNESS & Others Claimants - and - INGENIOUS MEDIA LTD & Others Defendants Claim No: FS-2017-000005 And Between : MR THOMAS AHEARNE & Others Claimants - and - PATRICK ANTHONY McKENNA & Others Defendants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nicholas Bacon QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP and Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for the Stewarts Claimants and the Peters & Peters Claimants P J Kirby QC (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP, Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP and Therium) for the Stewarts Claimants, the Peters & Peters Claimants and Therium Tom Mountford (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the Mishcon de Reya Claimants Simon Birt QC, Craig Morrison and Geoffrey Kuehne (instructed by RPC) for the Ingenious Defendants Ben Quiney QC and Carlo Taczalski (instructed by Kennedys Law LLP) for SRLV (a firm) James Duffy and Nick Daly (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Moves January - February
    Lateral Partner Moves in London January - February 2018 REPRESENTATION – SEARCH – TEAM MOVES www.edwardsgibson.com Welcome to the latest round up of lateral partner moves in the legal market from Edwards Gibson where we look back at announced partner-level recruitment activity in London over the past two months and give you a ‘who’s moved where’ update. In all there was a total of 91 lateral partner moves announced in this round up – 22% down on the same period last year when the figures were artificially buoyed by the collapse of King & Wood Mallesons’ European verein. Although fewer than the preceding two years, the number of moves in this edition corresponds almost exactly to the statistical average over the same period for the past 5 years (see graph below). Lateral Partner Moves January - February 2014 2014.5 2015 2015.5 2016 2016.5 2017 2017.5 2018 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 No. of Partner Moves 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Mean No. of Moves 2014 - 2018 in the January - February Period A total of 7 firms hired three or more partners in the first two months of this year. Surprisingly, the most prolific recruiter was the traditionally ultra conservative all equity White Shoe firm Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy. Milbank snared a full half-dozen new partners – comprising a four-partner restructuring and corporate team, and a two-partner high yield US capital markets team - from fellow New Yorkers Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft and Shearman & Sterling. Top partner recruiters in London January-February 2018 • Milbank Tweed 6 • K&L Gates 4 • Charles Russell Speechlys 4 • Brown Rudnick 3 • Fieldfisher 3 • Osborne Clarke 3 • Simmons & Simmons 3 REPRESENTATION – SEARCH – TEAM MOVES www.edwardsgibson.com So, an interesting, but not dramatic, start to the New Year.
    [Show full text]
  • MISHCON DE REYA Kevin Gold Setting the Gold Standard for Legal Business
    Law Firm of the Year WINNER MISHCON DE REYA Kevin Gold Setting the Gold standard for legal business On numbers alone, it was diffi cult to look beyond Mishcon de Reya’s outstanding performance for this award. In 2010-11 the fi rm posted a 37% jump in revenues to £65m. That’s formidable in any economic climate, let alone in a stagnant market. Management says the fi rm looks to be on course to hit £72m in the current fi nancial year, paving the way for the very real possibility of reaching its £80m target in 2013. Strategically, counterintuitive decisions have clearly paid off. Mishcons saw the global fi nancial crisis as an opportunity to grow. Equity partners took a £319,000 hit on drawings in 2008 to enable the fi rm to invest for the future. With the cash this move freed up, the fi rm embarked on a prolifi c hiring spree, taking on 18 new partners to date. Managing partner Kevin Gold has run the fi rm with admirable consistency and his right-hand-man, executive partner James Libson, is emphatic that the fi rm will continue to grow in the coming years. Last year proved a milestone year for Mishcon. The Royal Bank of Scotland’s James Tsolakis (far left) with Susan We will watch with interest to see what it will do next. Freeman and Kevin Gold (centre), plus a full Mishcons cast HIGHLY COMMENDED ALLEN & OVERY IRWIN MITCHELL David Morley Michael Napier QC This Magic Circle fi rm has bucked the trend A prime example of a truly innovative law fi rm, among its peers by increasing revenues Irwin Mitchell is an industry pioneer with its plans through the downturn with a compound annual to convert to an alternative business structure growth rate of 9% over fi ve years.
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Moves July
    Lateral Partner Moves in London July/August 2013 Addleshaw Goddard focus is on commercial real estate investment and Kambiz Larizadeh joins the firm from the London development. office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom where he was counsel. His focus is on complex cross- Duane Morris border commercial litigation and arbitration. The addition of Proskauer Rose corporate tax partner, Jennifer Wheater strengthens the firm’s corporate Berrymans Lace Mawer capability. Nick Gibbons moves to the insurance and dispute resolution firm from Ince & Co. He joins the TMT DWF practice concentrating on contentious and non- The firm has recruited Toby Askin from Wragge & Co contentious IT. to become Head of Real Estate in London and Birmingham, as well as national Head of Investment Brown Rudnick and funds. He will be based in London. The US firm has strengthened its white collar crime practice with the hire of Tom Epps from Hickman & Eversheds Rose. Former head of Sidley Austin’s IP and life sciences team in London, Brett Rowland has joined the firm. Bryan Cave He is dual qualified in Australia and England and Dan Larkin, previous European global Head of handles both contentious and non-contentious work. Hospitality and Leisure at legacy firm Salans, has been hired by Bryan Cave. Joining the transactions group, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher he leaves Dentons. The hire of disputes and international arbitration partner Penny Madden, from Skadden Arps marks an CMS Cameron McKenna expansion for the firm’s London office. Banking and finance partner Martin Brown has left Ashurst to return to his previous firm. Jones Day Raymond McKeeve, Berwin Leighton Paisner global Covington & Burling private equity head since March 2009, will leave to A boost for the firm’s international arbitration and strengthen Jones Day’s EMEA private equity and energy practices, with a double hire from CMS finance practice.
    [Show full text]