I-81 Widening Summary Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I-81 Widening Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Section 1 - Introduction 2 Figure 1 I-81 Study Segment Plan Map 7 Figure 2 2002 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 8 Section 2 - Corridor Overview and Needs 6 Figure 3 2030 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 9 Section 3 - Environmental Overview 12 Figure 4 60’ Existing Median 24 Section 4 - Public Involvement 16 Figure 5 84’ Existing Median 24 Section 5 - Transportation Solutions 20 Figure 6 Proposed Inside Widening (60’ Existing Median) 25 Figure 7 Proposed Inside Widening (84’ Existing Median) 25 Section 6 - Deployment Plan 30 Figure 8 Segment 1, Franklin County 31 • Segment Solutions and Costs 30 Figure 9 Segment 2, Franklin County 33 • Conceptual Projects and Costs 44 Figure 10 Segment 3, Franklin County / Cumberland County 34 Section 7 - Plan Results 62 Figure 11 Segment 4, Cumberland County 37 Figure 12 Segment 5, Cumberland County 39 Section 8 - Project Participants 66 Figure 13 Segment 6, Dauphin County 41 Figure 14 Segment 7, Dauphin County / Lebanon County 42 Figure 15 Conceptual Roadway Projects 45 Figure 16 Conceptual Project C1 47 Figure 17 Conceptual Project C2 48 Figure 18 Conceptual Project C3 50 Figure 19 Conceptual Project C4 52 Figure 20 Conceptual Project C5 54 Figure 21 Conceptual Project C6 56 Figure 22 Conceptual Project C7 58 Table 1 Multiple Environmental Resources 13 PAGE i Section 1 Introduction INTRODUCTION Introduction transportation needs along the corri- wide range of mainline, inter- dor and developed improvement con- change and side road improve- ments. he Pennsylvania Department of cepts to address those needs. Transportation (PENNDOT), in • I-81 from PA 114 to PA 581 conjunction with the Federal Improvements to the 77+ mile corri- T carries the highest peak hour dor present funding and programming Highway Administration (FHWA), has traffic volumes of any sub-seg- challenges to PENNDOT. In concert completed the I-81 Widening Study, ment along the study area. with the region's Metropolitan a two-year study, of approximately Current and future level of 77+ miles of Interstate 81 (I-81) in Planning Organizations, the service is expected to worsen. south central Pennsylvania. This Study Department must review hundreds of spans Franklin, Cumberland, Dauphin projects on a bi-annual basis to • The I-81 Corridor in Carlisle and Lebanon counties. ensure that the optimal needs of the has the highest concentration traveling public are met as effectively of interchanges along the entire The purpose of the study was to eval- as possible. study area with six inter- uate the need for improving and/or changes within an eight mile widening I-81 from the Maryland State There are several other factors to con- stretch. line (Exit 1) to PA 581 (Exit 59) and sider: from Interstate 83 (Exit 70) to • Maryland is currently studying • Future Exit 17, a new diamond Interstate 78 (Exit 89). As the the widening of 12 miles of interchange north of US 30 in expressway is already six lanes Interstate 81 from West Chambersburg, has been between Exits 59 and 70, this section Virginia to Pennsylvania. awarded and will be under con- was not included in the study area. Environmental clearance is struction in 2004. Through this four-phase study, PEN- expected in 2005 and the State NDOT identified existing and future Highway Administration is seek- ing funding for design and con- Summary Report struction. his Summary Report is an initial • PENNDOT District 8-0 recently step in PENNDOT's planning completed the Master Plan for T process which, working in con- Interstate 83 from I-81 (Exit cert with the Metropolitan Planning 70) southward to the Organizations (MPOs), the State Susquehanna River in Transportation Commission, and the Harrisburg. This heavily trav- public to develop the Transportation eled corridor is slated for a Improvement Program for the addition PAGE 2 Summary Report S.R. 0081, Section 036 · Franklin, Cumberland, Dauphin & Lebanon Counties, PA Introduction Moreover, an inside widening idly being proposed and built through- was chosen as the better of the out the area and therefore are con- widening concepts. stantly changing the I-81 context. The projected traffic volumes used for this Conceptual Roadway study included all planned develop- ments at the time of this study. Projects However, this document will need to be Since each of these segment revisited from time to time to ensure widening projects range in cost that the projects identified still meet from $130 million to $440 mil- the overall goal of this study - to lion, a more refined identifica- improve the safety, LOS and operation tion process, focused on reme- of I-81. diation, yielded high priority locations within the segment limits. These projects are approxi- of important transportation solutions that mately three to six miles in length with address the needs of the overall region. more manageable costs than the costs associated with constructing the entire This report summarizes the analysis of length of a segment. These smaller the entire corridor, comprised of seven conceptual projects can be constructed (7) segments (page 7), and development sooner and result in immediate positive of conceptual roadway projects. impacts to the safety, LOS and overall operation of I-81. In addition, each Segment Solutions project improvement will accommodate the projected 2030 traffic volumes, the Through the completion of this study, associated widening schemes, and will several concepts were identified and eval- set the template for future widening uated for their ability to provide the addi- tional required capacity based on future projects and ultimately the widening of traffic projections. This study concluded the entire corridor. that the widening of I-81 is neces- sary to achieve an acceptable Level Finally, it should be understood that of Service (LOS) for the 2030 project- commercial and residential develop- ed traffic volumes. ments and warehouse facilities are rap- PAGE 3 Section 2 Corridor Overview and Needs CORRIDOR OVERVIEW AND NEEDS This Study's Process The limits of each Segment are as follows: and projected growth of the I-81 corridor for both present and future conditions. s an initial step of the I-81 Exit 1 (PA 163 / State The following is a summary of the key Segment 1: Widening Study, PENNDOT Line) to Exit 10 (PA 914 / elements gathered and evaluated during Greencastle Aassessed the condition of the Marion) the course of this study. existing highway and bridge facilities along I-81, as well as determined cur- Exit 10 (PA 914 / Marion) Segment 2: rent and future traffic conditions. This to Exit 20 (PA 997 / Chambersburg phase also included an inventory of Scotland) environmental features along the corri- dor. All of these aspects were summarized Exit 20 (PA 997 / within a comprehensive document called Segment 3: Scotland) to Exit 44 (PA the Corridor Planning Report. Shippensburg 465 / Plainfield) Subsequently, the Project Team developed Exit 44 (PA 465 / and evaluated a variety of improvement Segment 4: Plainfield) to Exit 52 (US concepts to address the areas of need. Carlisle 11 / New Kingstown / Growth and Traffic This effort culminated into the Concepts Middlesex) Evaluation Report. A wide-range of con- Over the next 30 years, Franklin, Cumberland, Dauphin and Lebanon coun- cepts was initially screened at a broad Exit 52 (US 11 / New Segment 5: qualitative level based upon a variety of Kingstown / Middlesex) to ties are projected to experience continued Mechanicsburg project objectives, and then, after the ini- Exit 59 (Camp Hill) growth in population and employment. Of tial screening, the viable concepts were the four counties, Cumberland and evaluated in greater detail using quantita- Dauphin counties are expected to experi- Exit 70 (JCT I-83 / York) Segment 6: tive measures. to Exit 77 (PA 39 / ence the most growth. Harrisburg Manada Hill / Hershey) Both of these reports are available from One of the reasons for the growth is that Engineering District 8-0. this corridor is within two days delivery Exit 77 (PA 39 / Manada Segment 7: Hill / Hershey) to Exit 89 time of 50% of the United States' markets. For study purposes only, I-81 was divided Lebanon (JCT I-78 / Allentown). Because of this, the areas along I-81 are into seven segments based on several fac- experiencing heavy development pressure tors, e.g., interchange locations, land use from warehouse and distribution centers, and roadway classification. Illustrated in The Corridor Planning Report assessed resulting in an increase in truck traffic. Figure 1 on Page 7 are the segment limits the existing conditions, safety, geometric Growth in some areas is expected to within the study area. deficiencies, overall operations, traffic be so great that truck traffic in 2030 data, Level of Service (LOS), crash data PAGE 6 Summary Report S.R. 0081, Section 036 · Franklin, Cumberland, Dauphin & Lebanon Counties, PA Corridor OverviewandNeeds Figure 1. I-81 Study Segment Plan Map (not to scale) PAGE 7 Figure 2. 2002 Average Daily Traffic Volumes is projected to increase to a level 153,000 vpd. The estimation of future As development occurs and population equal to that of the total traffic traffic volumes involved the use of a increases, both within the study area today. It is also projected that the travel projection model that utilized and the region, traffic volumes will entire corridor within the study area, existing population, employment and increase. Traffic was assigned to the including almost all ramps at every development trends and translated roadway network using the Tri-County interchange, will operate at an unac- them into traffic volumes that can be traffic projection model. The model proj- ceptable LOS in the year 2030. distributed to the highway system. For ects traffic volumes based on future the purposes of this project, the existing demographic data and traffic patterns The present year 2002 traffic volumes travel projection model from the Tri- based on shortest travel time and dis- along the corridor range from 36,000 County Regional Planning Commission tances of trips.
Recommended publications
  • Final Point of Access Study
    Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network
    [Show full text]
  • Our Aging Interstates
    Our Aging Interstates Pennsylvania’s more than 2,700 miles of interstate highways snake into every corner of the state, carrying 1.8 million commuters a day and making the Commonwealth one of the busiest corridors for all those consumer goods people are buying from their phones this Christmas. With the fourth-largest interstate system in the country, including the 63 miles in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania has long been the envy of other states, but now its interstates are deteriorating faster than they can be repaired, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Highway Delivery Division Chief Melissa J. Batula said during a report to the Lehigh Valley Transportation Study (LVTS) and Freight Advisory Committee earlier this month. That includes Interstate 78 in the Lehigh Valley, where 62 percent of the roadway surface is rated to be in fair or poor condition, while just $8 million of the $259 million requested for “priority” projects has been programmed on the state’s 12-year plan for interstates. “We have a backlog of $251 million in the Lehigh Valley. We’re severely underfunded,” Batula said. “And that’s just what we need to keep the lights on. We’ve got to start talking about this amongst ourselves.” Those discussions won’t come easy. A report by the Interstate Steering Committee states that $13.8 billion in projects have been identified as priorities, while just $7.3 billion has been slated to be spent over the next 12 years, leaving about 188 “priority” projects unfunded. The ratio is even worse in the Lehigh Valley, where the more than 22,000 trucks daily – the second-highest statewide behind only I-81 – takes a greater toll on the roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    visionHagerstown 2035 5 | Transportation Transportation Introduction An adequate vehicular circulation system is vital for Hagerstown to remain a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Road projects that add highway capacity and new road links will be necessary to meet the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for growth management, economic development, and the downtown. This chapter addresses the City of Hagerstown’s existing transportation system and establishes priorities for improvements to roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities over the next 20 years. Goals 1. The city’s transportation network, including roads, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, will meet the mobility needs of its residents, businesses, and visitors of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. 2. Transportation projects will support the City’s growth management goals. 3. Long-distance traffic will use major highways to travel around Hagerstown rather than through the city. Issues Addressed by this Element 1. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs to be enhanced to maintain safe and efficient flow of people and goods in and around the city. 2. Hagerstown’s network of major roads is generally complete, with many missing or partially complete segments in the Medium-Range Growth Area. 3. Without upgrades, the existing road network will not be sufficient to accommodate future traffic in and around Hagerstown. 4. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs more alternatives to the automobile, including transit and bicycle facilities and pedestrian opportunities. Existing Transportation Network Known as “Hub City,” Hagerstown has long served as a transportation center, first as a waypoint on the National Road—America’s first Dual Highway (US Route 40) federally funded highway—and later as a railway node.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • I-83 EXIT 4 IMPROVEMENTS the Proposed Improvements Are at the Exit 4 Interchange of Interstate 83 (I-83) and Route 851 in Shrewsbury Township
    HOW DDI WORKS I-83 EXIT 4 IMPROVEMENTS The proposed improvements are at the Exit 4 Interchange of Interstate 83 (I-83) and Route 851 in Shrewsbury Township. The area surrounding the interchange has seen extensive growth that the existing interchange can no longer accommodate. There are high levels of congestion, traffic backs up onto I-83 and the bridge carrying I-83 traffic over Route 851 is structurally deficient. The purpose of the project is to ease congestion, increase capacity, and improve safety for motorists and pedestrians, by constructing a diverging diamond interchange (DDI). A diverging diamond interchange (DDI) is unique from a standard diamond interchange in that the side road traffic Route 851 PROJECT OBJECTIVES crosses to the left side of the road at a signalized intersection prior to the bridge. This allows direct left turns from the off-ramps to Route 851 and allows for a direct left turn on to the on-ramps to I-83. The side road (Route 851) traffic crosses back to the Eliminate traffic back-ups on the right side of the road at a signal beyond the bridge. ramps from I-83 to improve safety The DDI configuration has an operational advantage over the standard diamond in that it has only 2 phases per signal cycle versus 3 phases. This allows the DDI to provide more green time to traffic, alleviating congestion. Additionally, because of Increase capacity and reduce the direct left turns, there are fewer conflict points than a standard diamond, which reduces the crash rate and crash severity. congestion though the project area As of April 2018, 96 diverging diamond interchanges (DDIs) have been opened to traffic in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 90000 SF Warehouse Building with 80000 SF Available
    90,000 SF warehouse building with 80,000 SF available for lease. Existing tenant in remaining 10,000 SF. Property is located in the Valmont Industrial Park, 1.5 miles from Route I-81 & 10 miles from Route I-80. LATITUDE: 40.971340 LONGITUDE: -76.018204 90,000 SF+/- Building PIN: T7S7001025-63 7+/- Acres Public Utilities Block/Brick Exterior Flat Roof Concrete and Tile Floors 20 ft. Ceilings 480v, 600 amp Electric 6 Dock High Doors 1 Ground Level Drive-In Door 2 Tailgate Doors 40’ x 50’ Column Spacing Fluorescent Lighting Wet Sprinkler System Paved Parking for 46 Vehicles Zoned M-2 (Manufacturing) 2019 Taxes - $32,413 Al Guari, Vice President-Brokerage [email protected] Office: 570.823.1100 * Cell: 570.499.2889 1-800-894-8040 RPD Solutions www.rpdsolutions.com RPD Analyzer Detail Report with GIS Tax Map Luzerne County, PA Owner: 150 JAYCEE DRIVE ASSOCIATES LP PIN: T7S7001025-63 Owner2: Map: T7S7 Address: PO BOX 160 Township: WEST HAZLETON BOROUGH 63 ST PETERS PA 19470 Dev Desc: Prop Addr: 150 JAYCEE DR School Dist: Hazelton Area Gen Desc: 1 S COMM BLDG Land Use: Other Furniture and Fixtures-Manufacturing (2590) Deed Date: 04/10/2008 Land Asmt: $200,000 Section: Acreage: 7.0 Deed Book: 3008 Bldg Asmt: $1,350,000 Block: 001 Layout: Deed Page: 81400 Total Asmt: $1,550,000 Lot: 025 Zoning: Sale Date: 04/10/2008 School Tax: Year Built: Prop Class: Taxable Sale Price: $2,500,000 Twp Tax: Sq Ft: Structure: Type: Building Total Tax: $32,413 Stories: Style: Control #: 63-2-571-D11-7 Water: Loan Date 1: Ward Desc: 02 Sewer: Amount 1: Owner Class: Utility: Loan Type 1: Living Units: Heat Type: Rate Type 1: Condition: Heat Fuel: Int Rate 1: Road: Air Cond: Holder 1: Frontage: Depth: Total Rms: Tax Rate: Garage: Bedrooms: Tax Ratio: Attic: Full Baths: Other 1: Basement: Half Baths: Fireplaces: Kitchens: Other 2: Pool: Family Rms: Note: Image NOT a Complete Tax Map ..
    [Show full text]
  • FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge
    FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 74919 Municipality: Glenfield (Boro) Title: SR 65 @ NI Ramps Route:65 Section: A38 A/Q Status: Exempt Improvement Type: Reconstruct Exempt Code: Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est. Let Date: 06/26/2009 Actual Let Date: 06/26/2009 Geographic Limits: Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Narrative: Pavement reconstruction and crack sealing. Bridge preservation work to include; dam repair, deck repairs, latex overlay, minor abutment repairs, and bearing repairs. Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONBOO $9,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CONIM $12,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON185 $1,005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $1,344 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,487 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $23,487 MPMS #: 26926 Municipality: Title: I79 Ohio Rvr N to 279 Route:79 Section: 35M A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est. Let Date: 12/08/2006 Actual Let Date: 12/08/2006 Geographic Limits: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange in Boroughs of Glenfield, Sewickley Hills Narrative: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange Glenfield, Sewickley Hills, and Franklin Park Boro; Aleppo, Neville and Ohio Twps in Allegheny County Reconstruction of concrete pavement TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONIM $2,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $2,600 Page 1 of 100 FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 26924 Municipality: Title: I-79 Kirwin Heights-I279 Route:79 Section: A12 A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Lock Haven University
    LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY 401 N. Fairview St., Lock Haven, PA 17745 Directions to Durrwachter Alumni Conference Center Northwestern Pennsylvania: Interstate 79 South to 80 East. From Route 80, exit 178, turn left (north) on Route 220. Travel Route 220 north approximately eight miles to the Lock Haven exit. Turn left (west) on Route 120 (Jay Street). Go straight through two traffic lights, to stop sign at Jay Street and Water Street. Turn left on Water Street, following signs for Route 120 West. Travel approximately one mile to the Lock Haven campus. Just before the traffic light, turn right into the Durrwachter Alumni Conference Center where you will find ample visitor parking. Southwestern Pennsylvania Route 22 East to 220 North (I-99) to Route 150 to Lock Haven. Pass the Bob McCormick Ford Dealership, continue straight, halfway down the hill you will turn left onto North Fairview Street (on the right there will be a sign that reads: 120 West Renovo-Lock Haven University). Travel on North Fairview Street until you come to a traffic light. At the traffic light, turn right and make an immediate left into the Durrwachter Alumni Conference Center where you will find ample visitor parking. South Central Pennsylvania Route 11-15 North to Interstate 80 West to Lock Haven, exit 178 or Interstate 83 North to Interstate 81 South to 11-15 North to 15 North to Interstate 80 West to Lock Haven. From Route 80, exit 178 (formerly exit 26), turn right (north) on Route 220. Travel Route 220 north approximately eight miles to the Lock Haven exit.
    [Show full text]
  • Gatlinburg-Pigeon Forge-Sevierville, Tn Travel Directions To/From Free Parking at Bms Gatlinburg/Pigeon Forge/Sevierville, Tennessee
    GATLINBURG-PIGEON FORGE-SEVIERVILLE, TN TRAVEL DIRECTIONS TO/FROM FREE PARKING AT BMS GATLINBURG/PIGEON FORGE/SEVIERVILLE, TENNESSEE TO BMS There are two options for traveling from the Gatlinburg/Pigeon Forge/Sevierville area to BMS – via Blountville (to approach from the west on Highway 394) or via Johnson City (to approach from the south on Highway 11E). Highway 394 carries the heaviest load of race traffic of all the designated race routes. Via Blountville From Gatlinburg/Pigeon Forge/Sevierville, go east on Interstate 40 and take Exit 421 (a left-side exit) to northbound Interstate 81. There is a work zone on northbound Interstate 81 at Mile Marker 60 where a truck climbing lane is being constructed, but two lanes of traffic remain open through that work zone. You can get off at either Tennessee Exit 66 (Tennessee Highway 126) or Tennessee Exit 69 (Tennessee Highway 394). Using the Exit 66 route, turn right at the bottom of the ramp along eastbound Highway 126 towards Blountville. Go through the intersection with State Route 75. Take the second right past State Route 75 (Franklin Drive) in the Blountville community. Go two blocks and turn right at the traffic signal onto eastbound Highway 394. Using Franklin Drive allows you to avoid the heavily-used intersection of Highway 126 and Highway 394. Continue east on Highway 394. Go under the US 11E bridges. Get in the right lane. Go through the traffic signal at Tennessee Highway 390, staying in the right lane. To go to Speedway Parking, take a right turn at the next intersection (White Top Road); Speedway Parking is the first driveway on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Premier Business Park on Pennsylvania's I-81 Corridor
    THE PREMIER BUSINESS PARK ON PENNSYLVANIA'S I-81 CORRIDOR MESSAGE FROM OUR LEASING TEAM 03 LOCATION & TRANSPORTATION 05 WHY CHOOSE CENTERPOINT? 09 READYTOGO!™ PROGRAM 19 UTILITY INFORMATION 21 WORKFORCE & EDUCATION 29 COST ADVANTAGES & INCENTIVES 37 DISCOVER NEPA™ 43 MERICLE OVERVIEW 47 SOME OF MERICLE’S CLIENTS 53 1 222 JIM HILSHER VP - Director of Marketing [email protected] BILL JONES VP - Business Development [email protected] BOB BESECKER VP - Senior Director of Leasing [email protected] A MESSAGE FROM OUR LEASING TEAM Welcome to CenterPoint Commerce & Trade Park, the premier business park on Pennsylvania’s I-81 Corridor. Located at the intersection of Interstates 81 and 476, CenterPoint offers tax-free sites and buildings for industrial, office, and medical companies. CenterPoint is situated in Jenkins and Pittston Townships in the center of the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre metro area and can accommodate companies needing from 6,000 square feet to more than one million square feet. Every building constructed in the park receives a 10-year, 100% real estate tax abatement on improvements via the Local Economic Revitalization Tax Assistance Program (LERTA). CenterPoint also has Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) status, which provides potentially significant savings to companies that import products from outside the United States. Since 2006, Mericle has developed more than 10.7 million square feet of bulk industrial, office, flex, and medical space in the park. CenterPoint's more than 50 tenants include Benco Dental, Bimbo Bakeries, Corning, Geisinger, Greiner Packaging International, Isuzu, J.P. Boden, Lowe’s, Neiman Marcus, Quietflex Manufacturing, The Home Depot, and Tailored Brands.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Hazleton, Pennsylvania
    transportation GREATER HAZLETON, PENNSYLVANIA HIGHWAYS AIR BUS SERVICE quick facts I-80, I-81, I-84, I-380, I-476, SR 309, SR 924, Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport 35 miles Hazleton Public Transit community SR 93, SR 424 Lehigh Valley International Airport 50 miles Motor Transportation Company mile commute radius with a civilian labor Harrisburg International Airport 85 miles RAILROADS Greyhound service w/ Fullington force of 343,000 and population of 693,450 Philadelphia International Airport 105 miles Trailways 30 Norfolk Southern The Hazleton Municipal Airport can handle most Trailways service w/ Fullington million square feet of industrial space Reading Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad corporate jets. Trailways 20 is located throughout CAN DO’s parks square miles encompass the profile Hazleton Area School District 255 important contacts major employers AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT STATISTICS AND INFORMATION FOR GREATER HAZLETON, PA CAN DO, Inc. 570.455.1508 Amazon NE distributor of books, cds, dvds AVERAGE Greater Hazleton Chamber of Commerce 570.455.1509 American Eagle Outfitters NE distributor clothes & accessories City of Hazleton 570.459.4965 Auto Zone NE distributor of auto parts population commute time to work Hazle Township 570.455.2039 Bemis Mfg of extrusion and printing of polyfilm Butler Township 570.788.3547 Bradley Caldwell Distributor of hardware, farm & pet supplies West Hazleton Borough 570.455.7851 Greater Luzerne Hazleton/Wilkes-Barre/ Cargill Meat Solutions Retail meat processing facility Hazleton County Scranton MSA East Union Township 570.384.0739 Citterio USA Corporation Mfg of Italian style meat products Hazleton/Wilkes-Barre/Scranton MSA 555,426 Banks Township Municipal Authority 570.454.8291 DBi Services Global leader in infrastructure ops.
    [Show full text]