DOCSLIB.ORG

Tp-12 Ramp Closing with Detour

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tp-12 Ramp Closing with Detour CONES AS REQUIRED, 20 FT ON CENTER 2 MILES +/- SEE NOTE 4 4' X 8 FLASHING 500 FT 500 FT MIN ARROW BOARD CAUTION MODE 500 FT MIN 100 FT MIN 10 CONES S M V S S S C S C S C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C SECOND CONES AS REQUIRED, 20 FT O.C. EXIT VMS FIRST CLOSED EXIT EXIT DETOUR DETOUR DETOUR SEE NOTE 6 VMS CLOSED CLOSED 500 FT AHEAD SEE NOTE 5 OR OR SEE NOTES 7 THROUGH 9 LONG-TERM OVERNIGHT FIRST MESSAGE SECOND MESSAGE FIRST MESSAGE SECOND MESSAGE NOTES: SIX DAYS EXIT XXX STARTING EXIT XXX **DAY** **TIME** IN ADVANCE TO **DAY** TO CLOSE TO 1. SIGN LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD A MAXIMUM OF 50 FEET IN EITHER DIRECTION. CLOSE **TIME** OVERNITE **DAY** **TIME** 2. LEFT EXIT CLOSINGS SIMILAR. FIRST MESSAGE SECOND MESSAGE FIRST MESSAGE SECOND MESSAGE DURING EXIT XXX FOLLOW EXIT XXX FOLLOW 3. SEE STANDARD DRAWING TP-18 FOR ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ON PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNING AND MPT REQUIREMENTS. SCHEDULED WORK CLOSED DETOUR CLOSED DETOUR 4. THE CLOSING IS TO EXTEND INTO THE UPSTREAM SHOULDER. 2 MI 2 MI 5. THE FIRST VMS MAY BE OMITTED IF ITS ENVIRONMENT IN A DUALIZED ROADWAY HAS THE POTENTIAL TO PROVIDE A CONFLICTING MESSAGE TO PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN LEGENDS THE ROADWAY WHOSE RAMP WILL NOT BE CLOSED. 6. IN ADDITION TO THE PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN UNIT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2 MILES UPSTREAM FROM THE RAMP CLOSING, A LEGEND: SECOND PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN UNIT SHALL BE PLACED AT THE EXIT RAMP FOR USE 6 DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED WORK. BOTH SIGN UNITS DISSEMINATE THE SAME MESSAGES 6 DAYS IN ADVANCE. UPON COMMENCEMENT OF THE RAMP CLOSING THE SECOND S TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN 0 1/2 1 2 3 4 PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN UNIT IS TO BE REMOVED. CONE 7. GROUND MOUNTED DETOUR SIGNING SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE EXTENT AND DURATION OF THE DETOUR AND SHALL ORIGINAL SIZE IN INCHES CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS PRESENTED IN THE MOST RECENT EDITIONS OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND HIGHWAYS AND THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS BOOK AUTHORED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. VMS PORTABLE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN 8. EXAMPLES OF DETOURED ROUTE SIGNING ILLUSTRATED. IF NECESSARY, THE INTERSTATE SHIELD FOR INTERSTATE 95 OR INTERSTATE 78 MAY BE ADDED TO THE ASSEMBLY BUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE THE TURNPIKE TRAILBLAZER. WHEN THIS BECOMES THE CASE, THE CARDINAL ARROW BOARD STANDARD DRAWINGS DIRECTIONS AND THE AUXILIARY ARROWS SHALL MATCH THE COLOR SCHEMES OF THE INTERSTATE SHIELD. IN THE ABSENCE OF A NUMBERED TRUCK WITH MOUNTED ATTENUATOR HIGHWAY ROUTE, A SIGN WITH A WORD-ONLY LEGEND FOR THE INTERSECTING HIGHWAY IS TO BE APPLIED. 9. THE PENTAGONAL COUNTY ROUTE SHIELD IS ONLY ALLOWED FOR 500 SERIES ROUTES WHEN APPLICABLE. 1-DIGIT, 2-DIGIT, 600 SERIES, 700 RAMP CLOSING WITH DETOUR SERIES AND 800 SERIES COUNTY ROUTES ARE NOT ACCOMMODATED WITH THE PENTAGONAL COUNTY ROUTE SIGN. FOR THE ROUTES, A SIGN WITH A WORD-ONLY LEGEND FOR THE INTERSECTING HIGHWAY IS TO BE APPLIED. OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY STANDARD DRAWING WOODBRIDGE, NEW JERSEY 0 REISSUED DRAWING 12/16 TP-12 REV. DESCRIPTION DATE CONTRACT NO. SHEET NO. OF.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Point of Access Study
    Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network
    [Show full text]
  • Our Aging Interstates
    Our Aging Interstates Pennsylvania’s more than 2,700 miles of interstate highways snake into every corner of the state, carrying 1.8 million commuters a day and making the Commonwealth one of the busiest corridors for all those consumer goods people are buying from their phones this Christmas. With the fourth-largest interstate system in the country, including the 63 miles in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania has long been the envy of other states, but now its interstates are deteriorating faster than they can be repaired, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Highway Delivery Division Chief Melissa J. Batula said during a report to the Lehigh Valley Transportation Study (LVTS) and Freight Advisory Committee earlier this month. That includes Interstate 78 in the Lehigh Valley, where 62 percent of the roadway surface is rated to be in fair or poor condition, while just $8 million of the $259 million requested for “priority” projects has been programmed on the state’s 12-year plan for interstates. “We have a backlog of $251 million in the Lehigh Valley. We’re severely underfunded,” Batula said. “And that’s just what we need to keep the lights on. We’ve got to start talking about this amongst ourselves.” Those discussions won’t come easy. A report by the Interstate Steering Committee states that $13.8 billion in projects have been identified as priorities, while just $7.3 billion has been slated to be spent over the next 12 years, leaving about 188 “priority” projects unfunded. The ratio is even worse in the Lehigh Valley, where the more than 22,000 trucks daily – the second-highest statewide behind only I-81 – takes a greater toll on the roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge
    FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 74919 Municipality: Glenfield (Boro) Title: SR 65 @ NI Ramps Route:65 Section: A38 A/Q Status: Exempt Improvement Type: Reconstruct Exempt Code: Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est. Let Date: 06/26/2009 Actual Let Date: 06/26/2009 Geographic Limits: Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County Narrative: Pavement reconstruction and crack sealing. Bridge preservation work to include; dam repair, deck repairs, latex overlay, minor abutment repairs, and bearing repairs. Located on SR 65/I79 Neville Island Interchange (9 structures), Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONBOO $9,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CONIM $12,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON185 $1,005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $1,344 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,487 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $23,487 MPMS #: 26926 Municipality: Title: I79 Ohio Rvr N to 279 Route:79 Section: 35M A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est. Let Date: 12/08/2006 Actual Let Date: 12/08/2006 Geographic Limits: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange in Boroughs of Glenfield, Sewickley Hills Narrative: Located on I-79 from the Neville Bridge to the I279 north interchange Glenfield, Sewickley Hills, and Franklin Park Boro; Aleppo, Neville and Ohio Twps in Allegheny County Reconstruction of concrete pavement TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONIM $2,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CON581 $260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $2,600 Page 1 of 100 FFY 2009 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Allegheny MPMS #: 26924 Municipality: Title: I-79 Kirwin Heights-I279 Route:79 Section: A12 A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Restoration Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh Valley West
    Hamburg CORE5 LOGISTICS CENTER AT LEHIGH VALLEY WEST 180 380 80 81 80 Berwick TORONTO N.H. 80 VT. 209 Hazleton SYRACUSE 476 33 80 BOSTON NEW YORK 150 miles 35 522 86 R.I . Easton Pottsville 22 PEN NSYLVAN IA 79 81 78 Bethlehem Wilkes-Barre 84 Allentown 15 80 CORE5 LOGISTICS CENTER 78 309 AT LEHIGH VALLEY WEST80 NEW YORK 61 81 Allentown 322 PITTSBURGH 78 OHIO 611 99 HARRISBUR G 78 476 N. J. Carlisle Bedford PHILADELPHIA 22 222 76 83 202 70 81 York CORE5 LOGISTICS CENTER AT Reading 68 MA RYLAN D 95 Harrisburg BALTIMORE Ewing ATLANTI C 81 OCEA N 581 11 76 176 WEST VI RGIN IA WASHINGTON, DC 283 LEHIGH VALLEY WEST Carlisle 476 1 Ephrata 422 276 Levittown DE. Norristown 63 13 Route 61 & Zweizig Road, Hamburg, Berks County, Pennsylvania 95 76 295 202 15 83 30 Lancaster 30 ©2013 CALIPER; ©2012 NAVTEQ VI RGINIA 81 RICHMOND NORFOLK Jones Lang LaSalle Jason Webb Maria Ratzlaff 4999 Louise Drive, Suite 202 John Leinbaugh 717.791.2207 717.791.2210 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 Vice President Investments [email protected] [email protected] 78 717.791.2200 O 972.362.873 C 214.534.7899 jll.com [email protected] © Copyright 2017 Core5 Industrial Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. CORE5, CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, and the stylized “C” CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS design / logo are service marks of Core5 Industrial Partners, LLC for its real estate services, namely, acquisition, rental, brokerage, development, leasing, and management of industrial real estate property. These marks may not be used without express permission of Core5 Industrial Partners, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Directions to Stevens
    Travel Directions to Stevens Hoboken is approximately one square mile in area and is located on the New Jersey bank of the Hudson River between the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels. By Public Transportation From New York Bus: Take NJ Transit Bus No. 126, or the Academy Bus, from the Port Authority Bus Terminal at 8th Ave. and 40th Street. The bus goes directly to Hoboken and travels down Washington Street. From New York City, buses stop on even numbered streets. Please exit at 8th Street for main campus or 6th Street for academic buildings and walk east across Washington Street. Subway: Take Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) subway, marked Hoboken. Stations are located on 6th Avenue at 33rd, 23rd, 14th, and 9th Streets, and at Christopher and Hudson Streets. Once in Hoboken, take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk uptown to 6th Street and turn right (east) for the campus. Ferry: Take a NYWaterway ferry from Pier A at Battery Park, Pier 11 on Wall Street in Manhattan, the World Financial Center in Downtown Manhattan, or Pier 78 (week- ends only) at West 38th Street and 12th Avenue in Manhattan to the Hoboken South Terminal. From the Hoboken South Terminal take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk uptown to 6th Street and turn right (east) for the campus. Ferries from Pier 78 (everyday) also arrive at the Hoboken North Terminal (13th Street). From the Hoboken North Terminal take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk downtown to 8th Street and turn left (east) for the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Facilities in the United States
    TOLL FACILITIES US Department IN THE UNITED of Transportation Federal Highway STATES Administration BRIDGES-ROADS-TUNNELS-FERRIES February 1995 Publication No. FHWA-PL-95-034 TOLL FACILITIES US Department of Transporation Federal Highway IN THE UNITED STATES Administration Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries February 1995 Publication No: FHWA-PL-95-034 PREFACE This report contains selected information on toll facilities in the United States. The information is based on a survey of facilities in operation, financed, or under construction as of January 1, 1995. Beginning with this issue, Tables T-1 and T-2 include, where known: -- The direction of toll collection. -- The type of electronic toll collection system, if available. -- Whether the facility is part of the proposed National Highway System (NHS). A description of each table included in the report follows: Table T-1 contains information such as the name, financing or operating authority, location and termini, feature crossed, length, and road system for toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and ferries that connect highways. -- Parts 1 and 3 include the Interstate System route numbers for toll facilities located on the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. -- Parts 2 and 4 include a functional system identification code for non-Interstate System toll bridges, roads, and tunnels. -- Part 5 includes vehicular toll ferries. Table T-2 contains a list of those projects under serious consideration as toll facilities, awaiting completion of financing arrangements, or proposed as new toll facilities that are being studied for financial and operational feasibility. Table T-3 contains data on receipts of toll facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentations/Materials
    Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force Meeting April 13, 2011 Presented by: Kevin M. Skeels, PE Sr. Program Manager 1. Commission Overview 2. Capital Program Overview 3. Completed Projects 4. I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project 2 Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission DRJTBC Overview Est. in 1934 as a bistate agency Operates 7 toll bridges and 13 toll- supported bridges Jurisdiction extends 140 miles from Philadelphia/Bucks County line to New York State border The jurisdiction includes 8 counties (4 NJ and 4 PA plus a portion of Burlington County) Operates all vehicular bridges within our jurisdiction with the exception of Burlington-Bristol Bridge; PA/NJ Turnpike Bridge; and the Dingman’s Ferry Bridge www.drjtbc.org 4 A Board of 10 Commissioners: 5 from Pennsylvania and 5 from New Jersey The Pennsylvania members are 5 citizens appointed by the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and serve at the pleasure of the Governor. The New Jersey members are 5 citizens appointed by the Governor of the State of New Jersey, with the consent of the State Senate for three-year terms. The three-year terms are not concurrent: ◦ Two members are appointed in year 1 ◦ Two members are appointed in year 2 ◦ One member appointed in year 3 5 Toll Bridge Year Built Route Trenton – Morrisville 1952 US 1 New Hope – Lambertville 1971 US 202 Interstate 78 1989 I-78 Easton – Phillipsburg 1938 US 22 Portland – Columbia 1953 US 46, PA 611 Delaware Water Gap 1953 I-80 Milford – Montague
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes
    Identifying Potential Freeway Segments for Dedicated Truck Lanes Submitted By: Christopher J. Espiritu A Thesis Quality Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters of Science in Transportation Management Mineta Transportation Institute San Jose State University June 2013 Acknowledgements My greatest appreciation goes to Dr. Peter Haas and Rod Diridon for guiding me through this process. A special thank you goes to Dr. Nick Compin and Dr. Amelia Regan for their guidance and support of this project. My appreciation also goes to the representatives of the Caltrans Traffic Data Branch, Georgia DOT, Virginia DOT, Washington DOT, Oregon DOT, and NJ DOT; this project would not be possible without your great work. A special thank you also goes to Viviann Ferea for all the help and support over the last couple of years. This is dedicated to my loving family. To my sister (Charity) and my brother‐in‐law (Dave), for their unfailing support and encouragement. To my beloved Susan, for her support and patience. And finally, this is dedicated to my mother (Deborah), who I have dearly missed over the last year and a half since starting this program. Page 2 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 8 RESEARCH FOCUS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-78 Open Road Tolling – Design/Build KSE Williams Township, Pennsylvania
    I-78 Open Road Tolling – Design/Build KSE Williams Township, Pennsylvania PROJECT NAME Design / Build Services for I-78 Open Road Tolling at the Delaware River Crossing on Interstate I-78 KS Engineers, P.C. Engineers . Surveyors PROJECT OWNER Construction Managers Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission (DRJTBC) New Jersey New York Pennsylvania PROJECT CLIENT Connecticut A.P. Construction Company [email protected] START/ END DATES www.kseng.com 2009 – 2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION KS Engineers, P.C. (KSE) was the design engineer for this fast-track Design/Build project. On the Pennsylvania side, the existing Interstate 78 (I-78) toll facility is located in Williams Township, PA, approximately one mile west of the Delaware River. At this facility, tolls are collected in the westbound direction only and the existing toll plaza is a seven-lane facility that accommodates both manual toll collection and E-ZPass. Westbound I-78 is a three-lane Interstate freeway that widens to four lanes in the vicinity of the Cedarville Road overpass, prior to expanding to the full seven lanes approximately 800 feet from the existing toll plaza. The Commission is committed to implementing Open Road Tolling (ORT) at its I-78 river crossing. When the I-78 ORT project is completed, motorists equipped with E-ZPass will have the option of paying their tolls at highway speeds. ORT customers would pass under a space frame canopy of high-speed transponder readers, avoiding the necessity of slowing down or stopping. The design work associated with this project includes
    [Show full text]
  • Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment
    Holland-RU4474 Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment FINAL REPORT December 2005 Submitted by Maria Boile* Assistant Professor Michail Golias* Jon A. Carnegie** Graduate Research Assistant AICP/PP, Assistant Director Chris Riale** James Greller** Graduate Research Assistant Project Manager * Center for Advanced Infrastruc ture & Transportation (CAIT) Civil & Environmental Engineering Department Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Piscataway, NJ 08854-8014 ** Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick , NJ 08901 In cooperation with State of New Jersey Department of Transportation And U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Disclaimer Statement "The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who is (are) responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation." The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. Holland-RU4474 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Redesign of Holland Tunnel Entrance and Exit Consolidation Study December2005 Tier II Screening and Feasibility Assessment 6.
    [Show full text]
  • FFY 2019 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Draft
    FFY 2019 Interstate TIP Highway & Bridge Draft Current Date: 3/30/18 Allegheny 87756 MPMS #:87756 Municipality:Neville (Twp) Title:Neville Island Bridge Route:79 Section:A61 A/Q Status:Exempt Improvement Type:Bridge Preservation Exempt Code:Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Activities Est. Let Date:06/20/2019 Actual Let Date: Geographic Limits:I-79 and SR 65 bridges and associated ramps at interchanges 8015 and 8017 in Robinson and Neville Townships, and Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County. Narrative:Bridge preservation (paint, structural steel crack repairs) on I-79 and SR 65 bridges (Neville Island) and associated ramps in Robinson and Neville Townships, and Glenfield Borough, Allegheny County. TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund 2019 2020 2021 2022 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years FD 185 $ 2,060 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 UTL 185 $ 103 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ROW 185 $ 618 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 CON NHPP $ 0 $ 26,650 $ 16,000 $ 14,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,781 $ 26,650 $ 16,000 $ 14,000 $ 0 $ 0 Total FY 2019-2022 Cost $ 59,431 97027 MPMS #:97027 Municipality:Carnegie (Boro) Title:I-376/Carnegie Route:376 Section:000 A/Q Status:Exempt Interchange Improvement Type:Interchange Improvement Exempt Code:Interchange reconfiguration projects Est. Let Date:06/15/2031 Actual Let Date: Geographic Limits:Located on I-376 from approximately the Rosslyn Farms Interchange in Rosslyn Farms Borough to the Greentree Interchange in Greentree Borough, Allegheny County. Narrative:Interchange improvements on I-376 from approximately the Rosslyn Farms Interchange in Rosslyn Farms Borough to the Greentree Interchange in Greentree Borough, Allegheny County.
    [Show full text]