Mice with a Human Touch Is in Phase 3 Clinical Testing for Bone Resorption in Postmenopausal Women

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mice with a Human Touch Is in Phase 3 Clinical Testing for Bone Resorption in Postmenopausal Women NEWS FEATURE company’s fully-human transgenic mouse and Mice with a human touch is in phase 3 clinical testing for bone resorption in postmenopausal women. Years of tinkering with the mouse immune system genes has Rough waters for a superagonist finally produced a winner, with the approval of the first fully human But not everything was smooth sailing for monoclonal antibody made in a mouse. A real breakthrough or an new candidates and the companies that made them. The most widely publicized casualty is incremental improvement? Christopher Thomas Scott investigates. Germany’s TeGenero. The company’s lead drug, TGN1412, was a chimeric drug made by fusing mouse and human cells. Six male volunteers In September, 2006, the monoclonal antibody suffered severe immune responses during the Vectibix (panitumumab), offered by Thousand company’s disastrous phase 1 trial, conducted in Oaks, California–based Amgen, gained US Food the spring of 2006 at London’s Northwick Park and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for Hospital2. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- The clinical trial spelled the end for TeGenero, expressing colorectal cancers, the first totally which went bankrupt that summer. Peter human antibody made in a transgenic mouse. Parham, a Stanford University immunologist The 20-year quest to humanize mouse antibod- who studies the biology and evolution of major ies to avoid host immune responses had finally histocompatibility complex class I molecules, reached fruition. recalled hearing the TeGenero news. “I thought But the path to success has had its share of monoclonals would die on the vine,” he recalls. drama, with a patent dispute between two com- Figure 1 Engineering tour de force—the “But after looking at recent results, it looks like http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology panies with competing humanizing mouse plat- Xenomouse. Inactivating the mouse’s own they will do all right after all.” Parham singles forms that left one nearly penniless. And while antibody genes while supplying human out Rituxan (rituximab) offered by Genentech all this was going on, a rash of less than totally counterparts has led to the first fully human mAb and Biogen Idec, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, human antibodies has entered the clinic, largely drug made in a transgenic mouse. Source: Aya a chimeric mAb that targets CD20+ B cells, without incident, though one disastrous clinical Jakobovitz. which has been given to 600,000 lymphoma and trial could have brought the sector to its knees. arthritis patients as a case in point, noting the And if that weren’t enough, Vectibix’s target regions on a human scaffold— have gained fast drug’s safety record and gradual expansion for is in the cross hairs of several other marketed acceptance as an effective class of therapeutics. use in cancer and autoimmune disease. antibodies as well as some drugs in clinical tri- Current generation drugs include humanized Despite the trouble with TGN1412, the als. Whether Vectibix will be met with the same compounds such as the S. San Francisco–based market remains piping hot for approved prod- excitement in the clinic as it has in the board- Genentech’s breast cancer drug Herceptin ucts. Rituxan, Synagis and Centocor’s ReoPro Nature Publishing Group Group Nature Publishing 7 room remains to be seen. But at least for the (trastuzumab). Chimeric technologies include (abiciximab) each have annual revenues south moment, the spotlight is on the rodent that the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody of $3 billion. Since 1997, 18 mAb-based drugs 200 © made it, the Xenomouse (Fig. 1). Remicade (infliximab) produced by Centocor, have found the market, and 150 more are under a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, located development3. The mAb development timelines, Monoclonal saga in Horsham, Pennsylvania and prescribed from fully mouse in 1975 to fully human in 2006, Two years after Niels Jerne, César Milstein and for Crohn’s desease and arthritis. The first have averaged about 12 years—altogether strong George Köhler received the 1984 Nobel prize fully human mAb, the phage display–gener- performances for a field so young. in physiology or medicine for developing the ated Humira (adalimumab) from Abbott of technology to produce monoclonal antibodies Abbott Park, Illinois, and Cambridge Antibody The race for the fully humanized mouse (mAbs), the FDA approved the first mouse mAb Technology, a subsidiary of AstraZeneca of ‘Humanized’ mice with functional immuno- product, Orthoclone OKT3 (muromab), made London, is an anti-TNF-α drug targeting globulin loci of their own express both mouse by Johnson & Johnson of New Brunswick, New Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis and anky- and human antibodies and yield some, but not Jersey. The drug targeted human T-cell CD3 losing spondylitis. all, of the diversity present in a natural system. antigen and was prescribed to prevent rejection Though cancer and autoimmune diseases are The primary limitation of most approved mAb of transplanted kidneys1. Its shortcomings pre- prime foci for many mAb drugs, new targets have drugs is the immune response in patients who saged the major problem with this class of drug: emerged, such as AIDS and severe acute respi- take them—usually against the remaining after the first treatment, the patient makes anti- ratory syndrome (SARS). Human respiratory mouse components of the antibody. Making bodies against the constant (C) regions of the syncytial virus (RSV) infections, which cause transgenic mice that produced fully human mouse antibody, decreasing its effectiveness and significant mortality in infants, are successfully antibodies, while making none of their own, increasing the likelihood of complications. treated with a humanized anti-RSV antibody, became the next technical hurdle. To get around the immunogenetic properties Synagis (palivizumab) made by Medimmune Like many things in biotech, it was a race of mAbs, researchers began a quest using genetic of Gaithersburg, Maryland. Synagis is chime- to get there. In 1994, two San Francisco Bay engineering to make hybrid products combin- ric: six variable regions from the mouse mAb Area companies, GenPharm and Cell Genesys, ing mouse variable (V) regions with human C are inserted into a human IgG framework. A reported they had engineered mice to make regions. As a result, chimeric and humanized third targets RANKL, a TNF-family member fully human antibodies, now commonly called mAbs—those with murine variable regions stimulating the activation of osteoclasts. The ‘HumAb’ mice. The GenPharm method, devel- or murine complementarity-determining drug, Amgen’s denosomab, was made using the oped by its chief scientist, Nils Lonberg, now NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY VOLUME 25 NUMBER 10 OCTOBER 2007 1075 NEWS FEATURE senior vice president and scientific director Cell Genesys spun out Abgenix in 1996, senior vice president and chief scientific officer at Medarex in Princeton, New Jersey, used with the mouse as its mascot. The company at privately owned Agensys in Santa Monica, homologous recombination to disrupt the searched for a partner to develop its anticancer California, “was to deliver the entire immuno- mouse immunoglobulin genes and pronuclear drug, now known as Vectibix, which targets the globulin locus into the mouse germ line. We injection to deliver components of light and EGFR. It found one in Seattle-based Immunex. successfully transferred megabyte-sized pieces heavy human transgenes, including constant Amgen acquired Immunex in 2002, and with it of human immunoglobulin into a murine and variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) the Abgenix codevelopment deal. The biotech humoral immune system.” Amgen now offers regions. The Cell Genesys group also disabled giant liked what it saw, and completed the circle six strains of mice making human IgG1, 2 and the mouse machinery, but used protoplasts to in 2005, buying Abgenix for $2.2 billion4. It 4 heavy chains in combination with the human deliver large fragments of the relevant chro- managed the last stages of clinical trials and kappa and lambda light chain sequences. mosomes with a yeast artificial chromosome Vectibix was approved for colorectal cancer in In a parallel trajectory, GenPharm pushed (YAC) system. In both cases, the constructs 2006, the first approved fully human mAb prod- ahead, but not without causing a ruckus. Cell went through VDJ joining, a natural process uct made from any human Ig mouse technology, Genesys sued them in 1994 for theft of trade producing antibody diversity. In addition, called the XenoMouse (see p. 1127, this issue). secrets. GenPharm returned the favor with an B cells with a low affinity for the antigen Aya Jakobovits, originally at Cell Genesys and infringement countersuit, and the fight was on. embark on T-cell affinity maturation, which later at Abgenix, shepherded the XenoMouse For venture-backed GenPharm, it became a war relies on somatic mutations to make antibod- through its entire development. The strategy for of attrition. Cell Genesys, a public company ies that bind tightly to the target. the new technology, says Jakobovits, who is now backed by government-owned Japan Tobacco, Box 1 A crowded space Vectibix is far from the only drug targeting EGFR. One Genmab’s pivotal phase 3 results for head and neck cancer are in, http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology chimeric antibody, Erbitux (cetuximab) is approved and several a clinical comparison between the two molecules could uncover humanized mAbs are under development. Among the approved information about the efficacy and safety of the IgG class of drugs. EGFR-targeting drugs there are no head-to-head comparisons. On other fronts, a humanized mAb targeting EGFR, TheraCIM Like Vectibix, Erbitux, marketed by New York’s ImClone and (nimotuzumAb), has been approved in Argentina, China, Princeton, New Jersey’s Bristol-Myers Squibb, targets the Columbia, India and Cuba for inoperable head and neck cancer. extracellular domain EGFR for colorectal cancer. No clinical In August, the Ontario, Canada drugmaker YM Biosciences trial has fully tested the differences between a chimeric and announced it was targeting colorectal cancer, using the drug fully human product.
Recommended publications
  • Journal Pre-Proof
    Journal Pre-proof Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. Jaworski PII: S2319-4170(20)30209-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011 Reference: BJ 374 To appear in: Biomedical Journal Received Date: 2 September 2020 Revised Date: 6 November 2020 Accepted Date: 22 November 2020 Please cite this article as: Jaworski JP, Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention, Biomedical Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. TITLE: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. JAWORSKI Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina KEYWORDS: SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus, Monoclonal Antibody, mAb, Prophylaxis, Treatment CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Juan Pablo Jaworski, DVM, MSc, PhD. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Virología, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Las Cabañas y de los Reseros (S/N), Hurlingham (1686), Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel / Fax: 054-11-4621-1447 (int:3400) [email protected] ABSTRACT The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused unprecedented global health and economic crises.
    [Show full text]
  • Phage Display-Based Strategies for Cloning and Optimization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed Against Human Pathogens
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8273-8292; doi:10.3390/ijms13078273 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Phage Display-based Strategies for Cloning and Optimization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Human Pathogens Nicola Clementi *,†, Nicasio Mancini †, Laura Solforosi, Matteo Castelli, Massimo Clementi and Roberto Burioni Microbiology and Virology Unit, “Vita-Salute” San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (R.B.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-2-2643-5082; Fax: +39-2-2643-4288. Received: 16 March 2012; in revised form: 25 June 2012 / Accepted: 27 June 2012 / Published: 4 July 2012 Abstract: In the last two decades, several phage display-selected monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been described in the literature and a few of them have managed to reach the clinics. Among these, the anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) Palivizumab, a phage-display optimized mAb, is the only marketed mAb directed against microbial pathogens. Palivizumab is a clear example of the importance of choosing the most appropriate strategy when selecting or optimizing an anti-infectious mAb. From this perspective, the extreme versatility of phage-display technology makes it a useful tool when setting up different strategies for the selection of mAbs directed against human pathogens, especially when their possible clinical use is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Synagis, INN-Palivizumab;
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Synagis 50 mg/0.5 ml solution for injection Synagis 100 mg/1 ml solution for injection 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION 1 ml of Synagis solution contains 100 mg of palivizumab*. Each 0.5 ml vial contains 50 mg of palivizumab. Each 1 ml vial contains 100 mg of palivizumab. *Palivizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody produced by DNA technology in mouse myeloma host cells. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection. The solution is clear or slightly opalescent. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Synagis is indicated for the prevention of serious lower respiratory tract disease requiring hospitalisation caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in children at high risk for RSV disease: Children born at 35 weeks of gestation or less and less than 6 months of age at the onset of the RSV season. Children less than 2 years of age and requiring treatment for bronchopulmonary dysplasia within the last 6 months. Children less than 2 years of age and with haemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology The recommended dose of palivizumab is 15 mg/kg of body weight, given once a month during anticipated periods of RSV risk in the community. The volume (expressed in ml) of // Palivizumab // to be administered at one-monthly intervals = [patient weight in kg] multiplied by 0.15. Where possible, the first dose should be administered prior to commencement of the RSV season.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines/Pharmaceuticals of Animal Origin V3.0 November 2020
    Medicines/pharmaceuticals of animal origin V3.0 November 2020 Medicines/pharmaceuticals of animal origin - This guideline provides information for all clinical staff within Hospital and Health Services (HHS) on best practice for avoidance of issues related to animal products. Medicines/pharmaceuticals of animal origin - V3.0 November 2020 Published by the State of Queensland (Queensland Health), November 2020 This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au © State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 2020 You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the State of Queensland (Queensland Health). For more information contact: Medication Services Queensland, Queensland Health, GPO Box 48, Brisbane QLD 4001, email [email protected] An electronic version of this document is available at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/147507/qh-gdl-954.pdf Disclaimer: The content presented in this publication is distributed by the Queensland Government as an information source only. The State of Queensland makes no statements, representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any information contained in this publication. The State of Queensland disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation for liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate
    [Show full text]
  • CDER Therapeutic Biologic Products List
    CDER Therapeutic Biologic Products This list is intended to include all the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) user fee billable therapeutic biological products and potencies approved under Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act. The Orange Book includes a section entitled "Drug Products with Approval under Section 505 of the Act Administered by CBER." Included on that list are several products that have been transferred to CDER which would be considered billable also. Program fees are assessed for each potency in which the approved (non-revoked, non-suspended) product is manufactured in final dosage form. When evaluating the specific strength or potency of a drug in final dosage form for purposes of assessing program fees for liquid parenteral biological products, CDER intends to take into consideration both the total amount of drug substance in mass or units of activity in a product and the concentration of drug substance (mass or units of activity per unit volume of product). Biologic products considered to have a different strength or potency in a final dosage form will be given separate entries in the Biologics List and assessed separate program fees. An auto-injector that has the same strength or potency as a prefilled syringe or vial will generally be assessed a separate prescription drug program fee. In certain circumstances, products which have been discontinued from marketing but are still licensed are not assessed program fees. Those products are identified on the CDER Discontinued Biologic Product List section. The potency information contained in this list is based on information in our database.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutralizing Antibodies: the Elite Squad to Combat SARS-Cov-2
    November 20, 2020 Health & Physiology Neutralizing antibodies: the Elite Squad to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection 1 1 1 by Guanqiao Li | Research Associate; Yang Liu | Research Associate; Linqi Zhang | Professor 1: Center for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine and Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China This Break was edited by Max Caine, Editor-in-chief - TheScienceBreaker The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS -CoV-2) urgently calls for prevention and treatment interventions. Neutralizing antibodies isolated from recovered patients are capable of blocking the virus from entry into human cells, potentially acting as the “Elite Squad” to defeat SARS-CoV-2. Image credits: Alissa Eckert, MS; Dan Higgins, MAMS The rapid global transmission of SARS-CoV-2 poses a entering the cells. These antibodies are therefore severe health emergency affecting over 20 million called "neutralizing antibodies". Neutralizing people worldwide as of 12 August. The research antibodies hold a great promise for clinical communities have taken immediate and enormous intervention. A substantial number of investigational actions in search of therapeutic and prophylactic neutralizing antibodies are under development for interventions. The major strategies undertaken diverse infectious diseases. Notably, three have include repurposing “old” drugs, identifying "new" received approval to prevent respiratory syncytial drugs, and taking advantage of neutralizing virus (palivizumab) and prevent and treat anthrax antibodies produced in the plasma of survivors. (raxibacumab and obiltoxaximab). Ultimately, developing vaccines that provide sufficient and long protection against infection and Since the outbreak of COVID-19, we have been diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase 2B Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MEDI8897, a Monoclonal Anti
    MedImmune Protocol D5290C00003 Amendment 1 MEDI8897 25Jan2018; Final A Phase 2b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MEDI8897, a Monoclonal Antibody With an Extended Half-life Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, in Healthy Preterm Infants Sponsor Protocol Number: D5290C00003 Application Number: Investigational Product: MEDI8897 Sponsor: MedImmune, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20878, USA Medical Monitor: Senior Director, Clinical Development, MedImmune Contract Research Organization: Protocol History, Date: Original Protocol, 02Jun2016 Protocol Amendment 1, 25Jan2018 1 of 66 Template 16.2 MedImmune Protocol D5290C00003 Amendment 1 MEDI8897 25Jan2018; Final PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS TITLE A Phase 2b Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MEDI8897, a Monoclonal Antibody With an Extended Half-life Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, in Healthy Preterm Infants HYPOTHESES Primary Hypothesis: Compared to placebo, a single mg intramuscular (IM) dose of MEDI8897 will be efficacious in reducing medically attended lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in healthy preterm infants born between 29 weeks 0 days and 34 weeks 6 days gestational age (GA) and entering their first RSV season, and the safety profile will be acceptable. Secondary Hypotheses: 1. There will be a
    [Show full text]
  • Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19
    REVIEWS Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19 Peter C. Taylor 1 ✉ , Andrew C. Adams2, Matthew M. Hufford2, Inmaculada de la Torre2, Kevin Winthrop3 and Robert L. Gottlieb 4,5 Abstract | Several neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed and are now under evaluation in clinical trials. With the US Food and Drug Administration recently granting emergency use authorizations for neutralizing mAbs in non-hospitalized patients with mild-to- moderate COVID-19, there is an urgent need to discuss the broader potential of these novel therapies and to develop strategies to deploy them effectively in clinical practice, given limited initial availability. Here, we review the precedent for passive immunization and lessons learned from using antibody therapies for viral infections such as respiratory syncytial virus, Ebola virus and SARS-CoV infections. We then focus on the deployment of convalescent plasma and neutralizing mAbs for treatment of SARS- CoV-2. We review specific clinical questions, including the rationale for stratification of patients, potential biomarkers, known risk factors and temporal considerations for optimal clinical use. To answer these questions, there is a need to understand factors such as the kinetics of viral load and its correlation with clinical outcomes, endogenous antibody responses, pharmacokinetic properties of neutralizing mAbs and the potential benefit of combining antibodies to defend against emerging viral variants. 3–5 Monoclonal antibodies In the midst of the current COVID-19 pandemic, a combination therapy . Therefore, several questions (mAbs). Clonal antibodies variety of prophylactic and therapeutic treatments are need to be addressed about the potential clinical use of recognizing a single epitope on being developed or repurposed to combat COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Supplemental PDL June 2018
    Applies to: Nebraska Supplemental PDL Albenza (albendazole) Albenza (albendazole) Covered uses All medically accepted indications Exclusion Criteria See age restrictions Required Medical Enterobiasis, ascariasis: Medical documentation indicating use Information for treatment for enterobiasis and previous trial and failure to ivermectin and Pin-X Intestinal strongyloidiasis, cutaneous larva migrans, or infection by loa loa: Medical documentation indicating use for treatment for intestinal strongyloidiasis, cutaneous larva migrans, or infection by loa loa and previous trial and failure to ivermectin. Approve for use as empiric treatment for presumptive strongyloides infection in Sub-Saharan Africa refugees from LoaLoa endemic countries, regardless of previous ivermectin use.2 Echinococcosis (Hydatid disease), neurocysticercosis: Medical documentation indicating the use for treatment of echinococcosis or neurocysticercosis. Age restrictions 1 year of age or older Prescriber None Restrictions Coverage Duration 6 months (Hytadid) 1 month for other indications Other Criteria None Reference 1. Albenza [package insert]. Amedra Pharmaceuticals. Horsham, PA. February, 2013 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Overseas Presumptive Treatment of Strongyloidiasis, Schistosomiasis, and Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections. http://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/overseas/intestinalparasites- overseas.html. Accessed August 20, 2014. Updated 01/2017 Page 1 of 1 Applies to: Aristada (aripiprazole lauroxil) Nebraska
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supplementary Materials 1 2 Data Sources 3 in Total, 60 Antibodies
    1 Supplementary Materials 2 3 Data Sources 4 In total, 60 antibodies and antibody-based biologics that were approved 5 by the EMA or FDA between 1995 and 2019 were included in our analyses. 6 The excluded antibodies were: (1) the withdrawn or marketing discontinued antibodies 7 or fusion proteins (e.g., muromonab-CD3, efalizumab, tositumomab- 8 I131, daclizumab, catumaxomab, edrecolomab, Nebacumab, and alefacept); (2) 9 antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., brentuximab vedotin, ado-trastuzumab 10 emtansine, inotuzumab ozogamicin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, 11 and polatuzumab vedotin); (3) bi-specific antibodies (e.g., emicizumab and 12 blinatumomab); (4) antibodies with neither F CL, nor KD information available 13 (e.g., Ibritumomab tiuxetan, efmoroctocog-α, eftrenonacog-α, mogamulizumab, 14 and ustekinumab); (5) single-dosed antibodies that cannot support Css calculation, 15 including abciximab, 16 alemtuzumab, basiliximmab, bezlotoxumab, idarucizumab, obiloxaximab, and 17 raxibacumab; and (6) local dosing and acting antibodies (e.g., aflibercept, ranibizumab, 18 and brolucizumab). 19 We obtained the labeled TDs and dosing regimens from 20 the Drugs@FDA website and the literature. The following information was also 21 collected: (1) molecular weight, (2) administration route, (3) bioavailability (F), (4) in 22 vitro antigen-binding dissociation constant (KD), (5) the antibody systemic clearance 23 (CL), (6) target abundance and half-life, (7) the approved indications, 24 and (8) the mechanism of action. More specifications for these parameters were 25 provided in the Supplementary Table 1. 26 1 27 Supplementary Figure 1 28 29 30 Supplementary Figure 1. Target turnovers are not relevant to TEARs in four 31 disease-target scenarios. Dots represent the mean values.
    [Show full text]
  • Synagis) Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients Evidence Summary
    DATE: March 2016 TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL EVIDENCE-BASED OUTCOMES CENTER Palivizumab (Synagis) Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients Evidence Summary Critically Analyze the Evidence The GRADE criteria were used to evaluate the quality of evidence presented in research articles reviewed during the development of this guideline. The table below defines how the quality of evidence is rated and how a strong versus a weak recommendation is established. Recommendation STRONG Desirable effects clearly outweigh undesirable effects or vice versa WEAK Desirable effects closely balanced with undesirable effects Quality Type of Evidence High Consistent evidence from well-performed RCTs or exceptionally strong evidence from unbiased observational studies Moderate Evidence from RCTs with important limitations (e.g., inconsistent results, methodological flaws, indirect evidence, or imprecise results) or unusually strong evidence from unbiased observational studies Low Evidence for at least 1 critical outcome from observational studies, from RCTs with serious flaws or indirect evidence Very Low Evidence for at least 1 critical outcome from unsystematic clinical observations or very indirect evidence PICO Question 1: In hospitalized infants and young children at increased risk for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), does palivizumab (Synagis) prophylaxis along with strict infection control practices compared to strict infection control practices alone decrease the risk of nosocomial RSV infections? Recommendation(s): Strong recommendation with low quality evidence Palivizumab (Synagis) should not be administered routinely to all hospitalized infants and young children born premature, with chronic lung disease (CLD) or hemodynamically significant heart disease. Continued palivizumab (Synagis) prophylaxis is supported for any child who meets criteria and is admitted to TCH for a disease other than RSV infection after having met criteria for prophylaxis in the outpatient setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]