DOCSLIB.ORG

Carp River Floodplain Toward the Northeast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carp River Floodplain Toward the Northeast EExisting istingg Conditions AhiEiAtmospheric Environment- AiAir QualityQ li ¾ The baseline assessment for Air Quality fromo tthe ee existing st g landfill a d will incorporate copoate the 7 years of measured data from the EXISTING LANDFILL SOURCES area into the AERMOD numerical Combustion Gases, VOC's and dispersion model. model Sulfur Compounds ¾ ThThe RRoadway dyg and d UUrban b BBackground k d sources will be evaluated through measurementtd data. t ¾ The most important component URBAN BACKGROUND off ththe air i quality lit studies t di are ROADWAY SOURCES SOURCES Exhaust the Volatile Organic Compound CbtiCombustion Gases, VOC's, Particulate (VOC) iimpacts t since i ththese GasesGases, VOCsVOCs, Particulate are the critical components of landfill emissionsemissions. Atmosphericp Environment- Dust ¾ The baseline assessment for atmosphericp dust will be based on the hhundreds ndreds of measmeasurements rements that hahave e been taken over the past 7 yearsyears. ¾ The baseline assessment will include Roadway Aggregategg g some iimpact t from f ththe existing i ti landfill l dfill DtDust Operations even though the existing landfill will no longer be contributing in any significant wayypp once activitiesti iti hhave stopped. t d ¾ The use of ambient measurements is General Atmospheric the best way to incorporate dust Backgroundg itfllthimpactsp from all the sources shown h ¾ Measured data shows that the dust environment is fairly typical of Eastern OOntario. Development of Terms of Reference for an Proposedp West Carleton Environmental Centre EA of f Proposed P d New N Landfill L dfill EExisting istingg Conditions AtAtmospheric h i EnvironmentE i t- OdOdour Working Drop Off Face Bins (No Longerg (No( Longerg in Use)) in Use) Landfill Gas Landfill Gas Leachateh Collection Landfill Landfill Collection Collection andd GGas OdOdours andd System Destruction* Destruction* *WM has spent tens of millions of dollars to upgrade the gas collection and destruction system ¾ The baseline odour assessment for the new landfill will include an evaluation of the existingg landfill after closure. ¾ The odour sources (shown above) will be evaluated using a numerical atmospherictpp h i didispersion i model d l ththat t will ill iincorporate py t 5 years of f hourly h l y meteorological data and thousands of modelled receptor pointspoints. AtAtmospheric h i EnvironmentE i t- NiNoise ¾ The baseline assessment for noise will itincorporatepp measured ddtblihd data, published data and traffic data from the area into Roadway Noise the CADNA and ORACLE noise modelsmodels. ¾ The model will evaluate noise sources (gas collectioncollection, landfill gas to energy plant) from the existing site that will Noise remain after the site is closed. Aggregategg g Sources ¾ The predominant sources of noise in the from Operations EistingExisting area are the roadways around the sitesite. SitSite Development of Terms of Reference for an Proposedp West Carleton Environmental Centre EA of f Proposed P d New N Landfill L dfill EExisting istingg Conditions AtAtmospheric h i EnvironmentE i t Odour Complaints d 4500 ved 4071 eiv 4000 ece Re R 3500 s nt 3000 ai 2500 mpl 2000 om C Co 1500 1222 o of 461 r 1000 ber 500 mb um 0 168 Nu 66 2006 2007 2008 2009009 2010 Year ¾ Odour complaintspy received directly and/or forwarded to Waste Management by other parties are documented and addressed in accordance with the comprehensive site-wide Certificate of Approval (Ai(Air)() ) NNo. 7816-7C9JMR7C9JMR. ¾ In this regardregard, a quarterly report is submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Environment as per Condition 7 of the Certificate of Approval summarizingi igp ththe odour d complaints l i t and d ththe mitigation iti g ti actions ti ttaken. k ¾ A total of 66 odoodour r complaints were ere receireceived ed dduring ring 20102010. ¾ WM staff analyzed each complaint to establish the source of the odour and to remedy the situation if warrantedwarranted. Development of Terms of Reference for an Proposedp West Carleton Environmental Centre EA of f Proposed P d New N Landfill L dfill EExisting istingg Conditions GlGeology &Hd& Hydrogeology l Topography & Drainage: ¾ Topography in the area surrounding the Study Area ranges from sandy upland areas in the northwest and west to poorly -drained swampy areas and the Carp River floodplain toward the northeast. The primary natural topographic feature in the area is a northwest-southeast trending sand and gravel ridge, historically used for sand & gravel extraction. ¾ SurfaceSu ace ddrainage a age around a ou d the t e Study Area ea is s controlled co t o ed by tthe e gground ou d surface su ace topography and small Carp River tributariestributaries, as modified by the surrounding quarryqyp operations and the Highway gy 417 drainage gy system. North and west of the existing sitesite, surface drainage flows within the Huntley Creek watershed,hd,g and ddih discharges via i Huntley H l y CCreek k to the h CCarp pg RiRiver. AlAlong the h western boundary of the West Envelope, Envelope there is a Provincially Significant WWetland tl d (PSW) () which hi h serves as a hheadwater d t for f local l l creeks k and d agricultural drains. drains Surficial & Bedrock Geology: ¾ ThThe surficial fi i l ggygeology l observed b d in i the th Study St d y Area A vicinity i i it y is i a mixture i t of f poorly to well -sortedsorted, stratified gravels and sandssands, interbedded with lenses off silty ilty sand d-gravelgpl till. till DDeposits it are hhorizontally i t ll y bbedded, dd d often ft displaying di pyg l i evidence of cross-beddingbedding. Near the eastern side of the North EEnvelope, l sand d and d gravel l predominate d i t the th surficial fi i l ddeposits; it ththese grade d into sand and till deposits to the westwest. Along the Highway 417 boundary of the West EnvelopeEnvelope, shallow organic and till deposits overlie the limestone bedrock. ¾ Bedrock in the Study Area consists of grey, fine to medium-grained fossiliferous limestone with some shaly or sandy interbedsinterbeds. The bedrock surfacesu ace gegenerally e a y sslopes opes in a north o t -northeasterlyo t easte y direction d ect o uunder de tthe e study areaarea. The bedrock is classified as the Bobcaygeon FormationFormation, a member of the Middle Ordovician-agedgp Ottawa Group. ¾ Alonggp,yg the western side of the West Envelope, the Bobcaygeon Formation is in contact with the underlying (older) Gull River FormationFormation, another member offth the OttOttawa Group. Gp The Th contact t tb between t these th bedrock b d kf formations ti is i along a faulted zonezone. The bedrock formations in the area are transected by ththese steeply tpy l dipping di pp i g normal l faults. f lt Fracture F t density d it y typically t yp i ll y increases i in i close proximity to the fault zonezone. Development of Terms of Reference for an Proposedp West Carleton Environmental Centre EA of f Proposed P d New N Landfill L dfill EExisting istingg Conditions GlGeology &Hd& Hydrogeology l Physical Hydrogeology: ¾ Twoo ggroundwater ou d ate uunits ts uunderlay de ay tthe e Study Area ea : i) ) uunconsolidated co so dated sasands ds and gravelsgravels, and the hydraulically connected weathered upper bedrock surface (overburden( -shallow bedrock zone);); and ii) ) deeper p bedrock fractures (deeper bedrock zone)zone). ¾ Shallow groundwater flow generally follows the bedrock topographytopography, with a watert ttable bl elevation l ti ffrom roughlygy hl 128 mASL ASL iin ththe southwest th t portion p ti of f the th Study Area to less than 112 mASL east of Carp RoadRoad. Groundwater within ththe overburden b d -shallowhll bdbedrock k( (southwest(p th t portion ti of fth the site) it)fl ) flows northwardnorthward. Groundwater in the overburden-shallow bedrock across the remainderid of fthStdA the Study Area flflows northeast. th t RRegional i l groundwater d t flflow iin the deeper bedrock is northeastnortheast, toward Carp RiverRiver. Groundwater Quality: ¾ Natural shallow groundwater quality in the Study Area is potablepotable, has relatively low dissolved solids content, and is composed of a higher proportion of calcium, calcium magnesium and bicarbonate ions relative to other majorj,yp ions, typical of shallow ggroundwater from limestone environments. ¾ Groundwater qyquality in the overburden-shallow bedrock in the northern portion of the North Envelope is generally consistent with background concentrations,ihild,g while groundwater monitoring iildfh gp completed as ppart of the regular environmental monitoring program for the operating landfill site has shownh hihighergp h concentrations t ti of f leachate l h t indicator i di t parameters t relative l ti tto background conditions along the southern boundary. Elevated concentrationstti of fdil dissolved d parameters t are also l seen ddowngradient ditfth of the stormwater management pondpond, in a former area of biosolids storagestorage. ¾ Observed shallow groundwater concentrations on the West Envelope are generally within the range of expected background concentrationsconcentrations, with slightly higher concentrations of alkalinity and potassium in the northeast. ¾ Groundwater in monitoring wells installed in the overburden-shallow bedrock zone on the downgradient side of the existing landfill generally has higherg e coconcentrations ce t at o s oof leachate eac ate indicator d cato paparameters a ete s relative e at e to background conditions, conditions due to leachate from the unlined portions of the waste disposalp areas. Development of Terms of Reference for an Proposedp West Carleton Environmental Centre EA of f Proposed P d New N Landfill L dfill EExisting istingg Conditions GlGeology &Hd& Hydrogeology l Remedial Efforts: ¾ A purge well remediation system has been installed to capture the natural groundwater flow before it leaves the landfill sitesite. It does this by drawing the water level down between pumping wells, effectively creating a hydraulic barrier along the downgradient boundary of the landfill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Template – RFQ Advertisement
    INVITATION TO SUBMIT AN EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) AS TO THE AVAILABILITY OF SPACE FOR LEASE IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA FILE NUMBER 5225-2-2020-2 Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of Defense (DND) is asking interested parties to provide information for a potential lease of space for a vehicle maintenance and warehousing facility. The space should meet the following criteria: Section A: Lease Components 1. a lease term of ten (10) years, commencing on or about April 1, 2021, plus option to extend the lease for one (1) additional period of five (5) years; 2. 800 usable square metres (um2) of office space and 2,700 usable square metres (um2) of contiguous warehouse space, one (1) adjacent compound area of 10,500 usable square metres (um2); 3. the proposed space must be available approximately nine (9) months prior to the above- noted lease commencement date so all space may be prepared for occupancy; 4. the proposed space must be located in the National Capital Area and within the following boundaries (the geographical boundaries include sites on either side of the roads): Ottawa: North: March Road, Dunrobin Road, Cameron Harvey Drive, Ottawa River East: Blair Road, Innes Road, Highway 417 South: Hunt Club Road, Prince of Wales Drive, Fallowfield Road West: Huntley Road, Stitsville Main Street, Carp Road Click here for a visual display of the above boundaries. Please note that this information is for presentation only and that the Boundaries above have precedence. 5. the proposed space shall satisfy or be capable of satisfying the following criteria: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports and Council / et au Conseil November 7, 2013 7 novembre 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0230 SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN, OTTAWA PEDESTRIAN PLAN AND OTTAWA CYCLING PLAN UPDATE – ADDENDUM REPORT OBJET : PLAN DIRECTEUR DES TRANSPORTS, PLAN DE LA CIRCULATION PIÉTONNIÈRE D’OTTAWA ET PLAN SUR LE CYCLISME D’OTTAWA – ADDENDA REPORT RECOMMENDATION That Transportation Committee recommend Council approve the recommended changes identified in this report (Table 1) to the draft Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Pedestrian Plan and Ottawa Cycling Plan that was tabled on October 9, 2013 at the Joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission meeting. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil d’approuver les modifications recommandées et précisées dans le présent rapport (tableau 1) pour la version provisoire du Plan directeur des transports, le Plan de la circulation piétonnière d’Ottawa et le Plan sur le cyclisme d’Ottawa qui ont été déposé le 9 octobre 2013 lors de la réunion conjointe du Comité des transports et de la Commission du transport en commun. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Assumptions and Analysis This is an addendum to the October 9, 2013 joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission staff report (ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0193) to summarize the consultation feedback and proposed changes following the tabling and public release of the draft 2013 Transportation Master Plan (TMP), Ottawa Pedestrian Plan (OPP) and Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP).
    [Show full text]
  • And Position-Specific Appointments Consistent with The
    Document 1 Ward- and Position-Specific Appointments Consistent with the practice first established in the 2010-2014 Term of Council, it is recommended that the Mayor and/or the appropriate Ward Councillor be assigned to the following local board appointments1: • All Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) (see complete list below) • Mohr’s Landing / Quyon Port Authority (Councillor E. El-Chantiry, Ward 5 - West Carleton-March) • National Arts Centre (Mayor Watson) • Invest Ottawa (Mayor Watson) • Osgoode Care Centre (Councillor G. Darouze, Ward 20 – Osgoode) • Shaw Centre (Mayor Watson) • Ottawa Police Services Board (Mayor Watson) • Ottawa Community Housing Corporation (Mayor Watson) • Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation (Mayor Watson) • City of Ottawa Superannuation Fund (Mayor Watson) • Crime Prevention Ottawa (Mayor Watson) • Hydro Ottawa Holding (Mayor Watson) Complete List of BIAs (as of November 2018) • Bank Street (Councillor C. McKenney, Ward 14 - Somerset) • Barrhaven (Councillors J. Harder, Ward 3 – Barrhaven and C. Meehan, Ward 22 – Gloucester-South Nepean) • Bell’s Corners (Councillor R. Chiarelli, Ward 8 – College) • Byward Market (Councillor M. Fleury, Ward 12 – Rideau-Vanier) • Carp Road Corridor (Councillors E. El-Chantiry, Ward 5 - West Carleton-March and S. Moffatt, Ward 21 – Rideau Goulbourn) • Carp Village (Councillor E. El-Chantiry, Ward 5 - West Carleton-March) • Downtown Rideau (Councillor M. Fleury, Ward 12 – Rideau-Vanier) • Glebe (Councillor S. Menard, Ward 17 – Capital) • Heart of Orléans (Councillors M.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio: Office of the Auditor General Purchase Orders ≥ $10,000 Awarded Under Delegation of Authority for the Period April
    PORTFOLIO: OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL PURCHASE ORDERS ≥ $10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Document 1 FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 2013 TO JUNE 30, 2013 Professional / Follow-on / Vendor Item # PO Dept. Description Consulting Amount Non-Competitive Rationale Amendment Location Services 1 45074624 OAG Professional audit services regarding 2012 Audit services of selected Grant recipients. PE $36,727.22 WELCH AND COMPANY Section 22(1)(h) OTTAWA ON Professional Services < $50,000 2 45075016 OAG Services for specific Fraud and Waste Hotline reports. $11,193.60 NORMAN LALONDE INVESTIGATIONS Section 22(1)(e) INC Security or Confidentiality Matters OTTAWA ON 3 45073614 OAG Professional audit services for additional assignments within the Fleet Services Branch. PI A $29,955.09 SAMSON AND ASSOCIATES OTTAWA ON 1 of 58 PORTFOLIO: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PURCHASE ORDERS ≥ $10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Document 1 FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 2013 TO JUNE 30, 2013 Professional / Follow-on / Vendor Item # PO Dept. Description Consulting Amount Non-Competitive Rationale Amendment Location Services 4 45068121 CC Professional media monitoring services for the City of Ottawa. PO E $11,656.61 FPINFOMART A DIVISION OF POSTMEDIA DON MILLS ON 5 45074686 CC Professional services to carry out media and social media monitoring services for the Corporate PE $451,503.01 MEDIAMISER LTD Communications Department for a three (3) year period. OTTAWA ON 6 45074729 CCS Print, assemble, and deliver City of Ottawa 2013 Waste Collection Calendars. $14,462.13 NEW PRINTING INC OTTAWA ON 7 45074803 CCS Provision of print, mail and document management services for Public Health Vaccination Consent $16,483.34 GILMORE DOCULINK forms under Standing Offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Part 1 – Summary of Existing Watershed Resources – Brief Descriptions
    Appendix 1 – Part 1 – Summary of Existing Watershed Resources – Brief Descriptions Additional Vulnerability Analysis for Almonte WHPA Model (2007) The vulnerability analysis for the Almonte Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) completed in 2003 was updated to the most recent Ministry of the Environment (MOE) groundwater vulnerability guidance module. Updates to the Almonte WHPA model included the delineation of a 5 year time of travel (TOT) capture zone, vulnerability scoring for the Nepean aquifer and uncertainty analysis. A Multidisciplinary, Community-Based Study of the Environmental Health of the Rideau River: Final Report (2001) This report documents the results of the Rideau River Biodiversity Project (RRBP) which was conducted from 1998 to 2000 on the Rideau River from Smiths Falls to Ottawa. The projects goals were to assess the biodiversity of the Rideau River and to reconcile local needs with long- term sustainable management of its biological diversity. Eight biological components were monitored as part of the project and included: aquatic birds, aquatic invertebrates, aquatic plants, amphibians, fish, freshwater mussels, phytoplankton, and reptiles. In addition to the biological components of the study, water chemistry was also sampled and analyzed. A Prioritization System for Wetlands within the Rideau Valley Watershed, Draft Report (2006) The purposes of this study were to develop an updated and comprehensive inventory of all Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) evaluated wetlands in the Rideau Valley Watershed, develop a wetland protection prioritization scheme that can be applied to all evaluated wetlands for identification of the most threatened wetland habitats and prepare a database containing information from the OMNR’s evaluated wetland data records and the prioritized results for each evaluated wetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Ottawa Winter 2006
    Heritage Ottawa NEWSLETTER Dedicated to Preserving Our Built Heritage Winter 2006 Volume 33, No. 1 A Centennial for Tabaret Hall, 1905 – 2005 By Michel Prévost he grand staircase... six magnificent columns... the glassed-in rotunda... these prominent T features of Tabaret Hall recall salient moments for generations of students of their years at the University of Ottawa. Tabaret Hall, without a doubt, is the most recognizable building on campus. It has welcomed thousands of students and many national and s e v i h international celebrities since its opening. Last year c r a marked its centennial. a w a t t O Tabaret Hall’s early history can be traced back to f o y t December 2, 1903, when the main building of the i s r e v University, constructed between 1856 and 1886, i n U erupted into flames. When the fire was finally out, : o t o h the situation was grim: three people had died and P nothing was left of the building but smoking ruins. to be the building’s crowning glory. Peter Lyall of Despite the tragedy, the Oblate administration Montreal was awarded the construction contract, quickly took action and decided to rebuild on the worth $165,000. same site. The cornerstone was laid on May 24, 1904. Wanting a more imposing structure than the A host of prelates and dignitaries, including almost original, Rector J.-É. Émery engaged U.S. architect all of Canada’s Catholic bishops and archbishops, A. O. Von Herbulis of New York to create the the Governor General of Canada ( the 4th Earl of design.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Submission of Terms of Reference
    Notice of Submission of Terms of Reference Waste Management of Canada Corporation Terms of Reference for an Environmental Assessment West Carleton Environmental Centre As part of the Environmental Assessment (EA) process for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre (WCEC), a Terms of Reference (ToR) was submitted to the Ministry of the Environment for review as required under the Environmental Assessment Act (EAA). Submitting a proposed ToR is the first step in the EA process. If approved, the ToR will serve as a framework for the preparation and review of the EA for the proposed undertaking. The preparation of the EA represents the second step of the EAA approvals process. The new landfill is one component of the proposed WCEC, which is an integrated waste management facility that will include: New Landfill Footprint at WM’s West Carleton Environmental Centre • Residential diversion facility; • Materials recycling facility; • Organics processing facility; • Construction and demolition facility; and • Electronic waste handling facility The proposed location of the WCEC and the new landfill footprint component is within the City of Ottawa in the area shown on the map below. The new landfill footprint is expected to have a total capacity of about 6.5 million cubic metres. It will include a liner system, leachate collection and landfill gas collection systems. The role of the ToR is to provide the proponent with an approved framework for the completion of their EA. The ToR sets out how WM is proposing to assess the potential environmental effects of this proposal. The outcome of the EA will involve the identification of a preferred undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanata North Community Design Plan
    Transportation Master Plan Kanata North Community Design Plan 8.6 Evaluation Results The evaluation of the alternative design concepts resulted in the identification of desirable design elements to be incorporated in the preferred alternative design. The evaluation results and desirable design elements are summarized in the following table. Table 11: Evaluation of Alternative Design Concepts Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept D V Modified grid • Curvilinear road • Loop road with • Collector road road pattern pattern unique identity on top of ridge • Three accesses • Three accesses • Three accesses • Three accesses to March Road to March Road to March Road to March Road V One access to V One access to V One access to V One access to Old Carp Road Old Carp Road Old Carp Road Old Carp Road • Central PNR; V PNR at north • PNR north of • PNR at south Transportation Transportation doesn’t keep end, users from KNUEA; users end; users from core active north don’t from north don’t north traverse traverse core traverse core core V Walkable V Walkable V Walkable V Walkable neighbour- neighbour- neighbour- neighbour- hoods hoods hoods hoods V Transit V Transit V Transit V Transit Land Land Use supportive supportive supportive supportive V Four new water • Three new water V Four new water V Four new water crossings crossings crossings crossings • No retained V Retained • No retained • No retained Natural Natural Woodlot feature Woodlot Woodlot Feature Woodlot Feature Feature V Existing V Existing V Existing V Existing church, school, church,
    [Show full text]
  • Huntmar-Stittsvillemain- Environmental Assessment Study
    1 Report to Rapport au: Transportation Committee Comité des transports 3 June 2020 / 3 juin 2020 Submitted on May 25, 2020 Soumis le 25 mai 2020 Submitted by Soumis par: Vivi Chi, Manager / Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning / Planification des transports, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports (613) 580-2424, 21877, [email protected] Contact Person Personne ressource: Jabbar Siddique, Senior Project Manager, Transportation Environmental Assessments / Gestionnaire principal de projet, Evaluation environmentale des transports (613) 580-2424, 13914, [email protected] Ward: Kanata North (4); Stittsville (6); and File Number: ACS2020-TSD-PLN-0004 Rideau-Goulbourn (21) SUBJECT: Huntmar Drive Widening (Campeau to Maple Grove) and Stittsville Main Street Extension (Maple Grove to Robert Grant) Environmental Assessment Study – Statement of Work OBJET: Étude d’évaluation environnementale relative à l’élargissement de la promenade Huntmar (entre la promenade Campeau et le chemin Maple Grove) et au prolongement de la rue Stittsville Main (entre le chemin Maple Grove et l’avenue Robert-Grant) – Énoncé des travaux 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Transportation Committee approve the Statement of Work for the Huntmar Drive Widening (Campeau to Maple Grove) and Stittsville Main Street Extension (Maple Grove to Robert Grant) Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in this report and detailed in Document 1. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports approuve l’énoncé des travaux de l’étude d’évaluation environnementale relative à l’élargissement de la promenade Huntmar (entre la promenade Campeau et le chemin Maple Grove) et au prolongement de la rue Stittsville Main (entre le chemin Maple Grove et l’avenue Robert-Grant), comme l’indique le présent rapport et le précise le document 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Provincial Plaques Across Ontario
    An inventory of provincial plaques across Ontario Explore the Plaque database at heritagetrust.on.ca/plaques Last updated: November 20, 2018 An inventory of provincial plaques across Ontario Plaque title Location Region County/District Municipality "Canada First" Movement, The At the entrance to the National Club, 303 Greater Toronto Area City of Toronto City of Toronto Bay Street, Toronto "Cariboo" Cameron 1820-1888 On the grounds of his former home, Eastern Ontario United Counties of Stormont, Dundas Township of South Glengarry Fairfield, which now houses Legionaries of and Glengarry Christ, County Road 2 and County Road 27, west of Summerstown "Colored Corps" 1812-1815, The On Queenston Heights, near the Brock Niagara Falls and Region Regional Municipality of Niagara Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake monument, Queenston "Cyclone" Taylor 1885-1979 In Memorial Park, Yonge Street, Tara Southwestern Ontario County of Bruce Municipality of Arran-Elderslie "Howie" Morenz 1902-1937 In Howie Morenz Memorial Gardens, Southwestern Ontario County of Perth Township of West Perth Blanchard and Huron Streets, Mitchell "King" Capron 1796-1872 In front of his former home, 8 Homestead Southwestern Ontario County of Brant County of Brant Road, Paris "Ned" Hanlan 1855-1908 Near the ferry dock, Hanlans Point, Toronto Greater Toronto Area City of Toronto City of Toronto Islands, Toronto "Old" City Hall 1899-1965 In front of the east wing of the building, 60 Greater Toronto Area City of Toronto City of Toronto Queen Street West, Toronto "Pirate" Johnston 1782-1870
    [Show full text]
  • Carp River Action Plan
    Carp Action Plan May 2015 Potential Rehabilitation Along the Carp River Downstream of Richardson Side Road TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Review of Carp River Subwatershed Study Objectives ................................................................................... 2 3.0 Carp Action Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Shoreline Planting ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Blockage Removal ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3.3 City Stream Watch ....................................................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Engineered Restoration................................................................................................................................. 5 4.0 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.1 Landowner Participation ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]