DOCSLIB.ORG

Exercise Caribe Wave/Lantex 15, A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exercise Caribe Wave/Lantex 15, A Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Technical Series 118 EXERCISE CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX 15 A Caribbean and Northwestern Atlantic Tsunami Warning Exercise 25 March 2015 Volume 2 Summary Report UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Technical Series 118 EXERCISE CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX 15 A Caribbean and Northwestern Atlantic Tsunami Warning Exercise 25 March 2015 Volume 2 Summary Report UNESCO 2020 IOC Technical Series, 118 (volume 2) Paris, July 2020 English only The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariats of UNESCO and IOC concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of the frontiers of any country or territory. For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as follows: UNESCO/IOC. 2020. Exercise Caribe Wave/Lantex 15. A Caribbean and Northwestern Atlantic Tsunami Warning Exercise, 25 March 2015, Volume 2. Paris, UNESCO. Report prepared by: Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami and other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (ICG/CARIBE-EWS) Published in 2020 by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, Place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP UNESCO 2020 (IOC/2014/TS/118 Vol.2) IOC Technical Series, 118(2) page (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS page Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 2 2. EXERCISE CONCEPT ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................. 4 2.3 TYPES OF EXERCISE ............................................................................................... 4 3. EXERCISE OUTLINE .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 US National Tsunami Warning Center .................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Pacific Tsunami Warning Center ............................................................................. 8 3.2 MASTER SCHEDULE (EXERCISE SCRIPT) ............................................................. 9 3.3 ACTIONS IN THE CASE OF A REAL EVENT .......................................................... 12 3.4 PROCEDURE FOR FALSE ALARM ......................................................................... 12 3.5 REGISTRATIONS PROCEDURE´ ........................................................................... 12 3.6 SEA LEVEL STATION STATUS DURING EXERCISE ............................................. 14 3.7 TWEB MODELLING DURING EXERCISE ............................................................... 16 3.8 RESOURCES ........................................................................................................... 16 3.9 MEDIA ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................................... 17 4. POST-EXERCISE EVALUATION...................................................................................... 17 5. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 17 ANNEXES I. SURVEY RESULTS II. SEA LEVEL STATUS III. TWEB MODEL FOR PANAMA SCENARIO IV. PTWC ENHANCED PRODUCTS FOR THE CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX PANAMA SCENARIO V. EXERCISE MESSAGES VI. LIST OF ACRONYMS IOC Technical Series, 118(2) Summary On 25 March 2015, two regional tsunami exercises took place in the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions: CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX (Panama Scenario) and LANTEX (Florida Scenario). Thirty-two (32) Members States and 16 territories1* participated in the fourth regional tsunami exercise. This represents a participation rate of 100% of all the Member States of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami and other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Seas (ICG/CARIBE-EWS) of UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC/UNESCO), for the first time in the history of the exercises. This is an increase from 98% participation in 2014, 75% in 2011 and 94% in 2013. Registered participants included designated UNESCO CARIBE-EWS Tsunami Warning Focal Points (TWFPs) and National Contacts (TNCs), in addition to more than 1,000 other international, state, territorial, and local Emergency Management Organizations (EMOs), government agencies, academic institutions, private businesses and organizations, health facilities, media, as well as communities and individuals. Almost 200,000 people participated, including over 80,953 people in Puerto Rico, 31,685 people in Venezuela, 8,637 people in Martinique, and 4,793 in the US Virgin Islands (Table 6). This high level of participation reflects an improved level of understanding of the tsunami threat in the area, and a commitment to tsunami preparedness in the region. The Start of Exercise (“Dummy”) messages were issued by the PTWC and US NTWC at 14h05 UTC for the Panama scenario and 13h02 for Florida scenario. To test communication these were disseminated over all standard TWC broadcast channels (Global Telecommunications Satellite, Weather Wire, AWIPS, Aeronautical Information System Replacement, Emergency Managers Weather Information Network, email, fax) to all official TWFPs. Start of Exercise messages were also sent out through Twitter for the first time in the history of the exercise. During the exercise, communities were alerted through use of local warning systems including sirens, SMS and EAS, as well as social media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Through participation of people throughout the Caribbean, #CaribeWave2015 was the #11 top trending topic on Twitter for over five hours. For this year’s exercise two scenarios were developed. The first scenario, CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX 2015 (Panama Scenario), simulated a tsunami generated by an M 8.5 earthquake north of Panama on the Northern Panama Deformed Belt. The Panama Scenario was modelled off the 7 September 1882 earthquake and tsunami, which affected the coasts of countries and territories within the Caribbean. The maximum reported wave amplitude from the 1882 tsunami was 3.0 metres. The second exercise, LANTEX 2015 (Florida Scenario) simulated a tsunami generated by a M 6.8 earthquake, which triggered a submarine landslide originating 215 km east of Port Canaveral, Florida, USA. In the case of this submarine landslide, several studies have been conducted evaluating its potential source. Through the exercise, it has been possible to: Validate the issuance of tsunami products from the PTWC and US NTWC, which currently serve as the tsunami service providers for the region. Validate the receipt and dissemination of tsunami products by TWFP’s. Most TWP’s continue to be strongly dependant on Fax and Email, with a few indicating receipt of messages through EMWIN, GTS and AISR. Email and Fax were also used predominantly to 1 Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Brazil (Observer), Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba (Observer), Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, France (Martinique, Guadeloupe, French Guyana, St Barthelemy, St Martin), Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Netherlands (Bonaire, Saba and Sint Eustatius), Nicaragua, Panama, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sint Maarten, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Montserrat and Turks and Caicos), United States (Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands) and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). IOC Technical Series, 118(2) page 2 disseminate information to the Disaster Management organizations. In 38% of the Member States and Territories messages were also disseminated to the public, the principal mechanism for this dissemination was Radio, TV and police. Continue with the exposure to proposed enhanced PTWC products, which include graphics. The Member States continue to support these products. Validate the readiness of the CARIBE-EWS countries to respond to a distant tsunami. Most countries also indicated that they had emergency response plans for distant tsunamis, as well as local and regional events. Nevertheless, most countries indicated that they do not have tsunami inundation, nor evacuation maps or mass evacuation plans. Planning for CARIBE WAVE/LANTEX took over a year and was coordinated by a task team led by the US NWS Caribbean Tsunami Warning Program (CTWP) and included the Caribbean Tsunami Information Centre (CTIC), CARIBE-EWS officers, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), the US NTWC, the Puerto Rico Seismic Network (PRSN), the International Tsunami Information Center (ITIC), regional emergency management organizations and Tsunami National Contacts (TNCs) and Tsunami Warning Focal Points (TWFPs). The Participant Handbook (IOC/2014/TS/118VOL.1), which was distributed in November 2014, and other information and supporting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Important Product Information
    CIMPLICITY 11 Important Product Information GE Digital Proficy Historian and Operations Hub: Data Analysis in Context 1 Proprietary Notice The information contained in this publication is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, General Electric Company assumes no responsibilities for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Information contained in the publication is subject to change without notice. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or stored in a database or retrieval system, or transmitted or distributed in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of General Electric Company. Information contained herein is subject to change without notice. © 2020, General Electric Company. All rights reserved. Trademark Notices GE, the GE Monogram, and Predix are either registered trademarks or trademarks of General Electric Company. Microsoft® is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation, in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. We want to hear from you. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions about our documentation, send them to the following email address: [email protected] Important Product Information Chapter 1. Important Product Information......................................................................................3 What's New in CIMPLICITY 11...................................................................................................3 System
    [Show full text]
  • HTTP Cookie - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 14/05/2014
    HTTP cookie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 14/05/2014 Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search HTTP cookie From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Navigation A cookie, also known as an HTTP cookie, web cookie, or browser HTTP Main page cookie, is a small piece of data sent from a website and stored in a Persistence · Compression · HTTPS · Contents user's web browser while the user is browsing that website. Every time Request methods Featured content the user loads the website, the browser sends the cookie back to the OPTIONS · GET · HEAD · POST · PUT · Current events server to notify the website of the user's previous activity.[1] Cookies DELETE · TRACE · CONNECT · PATCH · Random article Donate to Wikipedia were designed to be a reliable mechanism for websites to remember Header fields Wikimedia Shop stateful information (such as items in a shopping cart) or to record the Cookie · ETag · Location · HTTP referer · DNT user's browsing activity (including clicking particular buttons, logging in, · X-Forwarded-For · Interaction or recording which pages were visited by the user as far back as months Status codes or years ago). 301 Moved Permanently · 302 Found · Help 303 See Other · 403 Forbidden · About Wikipedia Although cookies cannot carry viruses, and cannot install malware on 404 Not Found · [2] Community portal the host computer, tracking cookies and especially third-party v · t · e · Recent changes tracking cookies are commonly used as ways to compile long-term Contact page records of individuals' browsing histories—a potential privacy concern that prompted European[3] and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Product Information
    Proficy CIMPLICITY 11.1 Important Product Information GE Digital Proficy Historian and Operations Hub: Data Analysis in Context 1 Proprietary Notice The information contained in this publication is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, General Electric Company assumes no responsibilities for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Information contained in the publication is subject to change without notice. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or stored in a database or retrieval system, or transmitted or distributed in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of General Electric Company. Information contained herein is subject to change without notice. © 2021, General Electric Company. All rights reserved. Trademark Notices GE, the GE Monogram, and Predix are either registered trademarks or trademarks of General Electric Company. Microsoft® is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation, in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. We want to hear from you. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions about our documentation, send them to the following email address: [email protected] Chapter 1. Important Product Information......................................................................................3 What's New in CIMPLICITY 11.1................................................................................................3 System Requirements and
    [Show full text]
  • Discontinued Browsers List
    Discontinued Browsers List Look back into history at the fallen windows of yesteryear. Welcome to the dead pool. We include both officially discontinued, as well as those that have not updated. If you are interested in browsers that still work, try our big browser list. All links open in new windows. 1. Abaco (discontinued) http://lab-fgb.com/abaco 2. Acoo (last updated 2009) http://www.acoobrowser.com 3. Amaya (discontinued 2013) https://www.w3.org/Amaya 4. AOL Explorer (discontinued 2006) https://www.aol.com 5. AMosaic (discontinued in 2006) No website 6. Arachne (last updated 2013) http://www.glennmcc.org 7. Arena (discontinued in 1998) https://www.w3.org/Arena 8. Ariadna (discontinued in 1998) http://www.ariadna.ru 9. Arora (discontinued in 2011) https://github.com/Arora/arora 10. AWeb (last updated 2001) http://www.amitrix.com/aweb.html 11. Baidu (discontinued 2019) https://liulanqi.baidu.com 12. Beamrise (last updated 2014) http://www.sien.com 13. Beonex Communicator (discontinued in 2004) https://www.beonex.com 14. BlackHawk (last updated 2015) http://www.netgate.sk/blackhawk 15. Bolt (discontinued 2011) No website 16. Browse3d (last updated 2005) http://www.browse3d.com 17. Browzar (last updated 2013) http://www.browzar.com 18. Camino (discontinued in 2013) http://caminobrowser.org 19. Classilla (last updated 2014) https://www.floodgap.com/software/classilla 20. CometBird (discontinued 2015) http://www.cometbird.com 21. Conkeror (last updated 2016) http://conkeror.org 22. Crazy Browser (last updated 2013) No website 23. Deepnet Explorer (discontinued in 2006) http://www.deepnetexplorer.com 24. Enigma (last updated 2012) No website 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/25/2018 6:57:35 PM OMB No
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/25/2018 6:57:35 PM OMB No. 1124-0002; Expires April 30,2017 vs. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending 06/30/2018 (Insert date) t - REGISTRANT 1. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. CMGRP, Inc. d/b/a Weber Sharidwick 3911 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 733 Tenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 2. Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence addressees) Yes □ No □ (2) Citizenship Yes □ No □ (3) Occupation Yes □ No □ (b) If ah organization: (1) Name Yes □ NoS (2) Ownership or control Yes □ No 0 (3) Branch offices Yes □ No 0 (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. None IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). " 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6month reporting period. Yes □ No 0 ’ - If yes, have you filed ah amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes □ No □ If no, please attach the required amendment. T fkeExhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy orthe charter, articles otincorporation/associationrand by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver of the requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon writtcri'application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Jobless Claims Hit 6.6 Million
    P2JW094000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** FRIDAY,APRIL 3, 2020 ~VOL. CCLXXV NO.78 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 21413.44 À 469.93 2.2% NASDAQ 7487.31 À 1.7% STOXX 600 312.08 À 0.4% 10-YR. TREAS. À 2/32 , yield 0.624% OIL $25.32 À $5.01 GOLD $1,625.70 À $47.50 EURO $1.0857 YEN 107.89 What’s U.S. Jobless Claims Hit 6.6Million News 6% Over the lasttwo weeks, newapplications for Weekly applications AK 4 unemploymentbenefitsindicatethat6%ofU.S. strain benefit systems Business&Finance 2 workershavelosttheir jobs. as coronavirus cases 0 ME top a million globally record 6.6 million A Americans applied for March weekly newjoblessclaims BY SARAH CHANEY unemployment benefitslast as shareoflabor force, by state In NewYork, AND ERIC MORATH VT NH week as the coronavirus Michigan sawclaims 4.7% filedthe struck the U.S. economy jump from 2.6% to lasttwo Arecord6.6 million Ameri- and sent arecently booming 6.3% of workers. weeks. cans applied forunemploy- labor market intofreefall. A1 ment benefitslast week as the WA ID MT ND MN MI NY MA newcoronavirus struck the U.S. oil prices jumped RI U.S. economyand sent are- 25% in their biggest one- cently booming labor market day rally on record, lifted intofreefall, as confirmed by investors’ hopes that cases topped a million world- initial steps to end a global OR UT WY SD IA WI IN OH PA NJ CT wide on Thursday. pricewar will offer are- Theworld-wide count of prievetothe industry. A1 deaths from the Covid-19 re- Stocks in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahamas Was Funded by the NIB
    April 15, 2012 The Abaconian Section A Page 1 VOLUME 20 NUMBER 8 APRIL 15th, 2012 Contract signed for $12 million health care facility On April 10 the Abaco Commu- nity Health Care Facility’s contract was signed. Coastline Construction and Devel- opment Company Ltd. was the company with the winning bid. The official signing ceremony took place on the grounds where the construction of the new health care fa- cility is to begin shortly. The Prime Min- ister, Minister of Works, and Minister of Health were among the government offi- cials present at the signing ceremony. The contract is for $11,969,280.60 and work is to be completed over a 60-week period. The health care facility, which was designed by New Providence-based archi- tectural firm Alvin K.Rolle & Associates, was presented as a state-of-the-art prop- erty to the hundreds of business and com- munity leaders in attendance. It will be a single storied building sprawling out over approximately 32,000 square feet includ- ing auxiliary buildings to house a morgue and equipment. It was designed to reflect traditional colonial characteristics. Island Administrator, Cephas Coo- per, delivered opening remarks and acted as the master of ceremonies. The signing Please see Contract Page 5 Funds raised for Lowe House Abaco brings home gold Rotary, Pilot, Scurvy Few and other civic clubs join together for a good cause from CARIFTA Above: A pensive young girl weighs her options for the lollipop-draw. This game, and others, were among the attractions that day. For the full story see page 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1C:Enterprise 8.2 User Manual
    1C:EntErprisE 8.2 User Manual Moscow 1C Company 2010 ENTIRE COPYRIGHT TO SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION BELONGS TO 1C COMPANY By purchasing 1C:Enterprise software system you hereby agree to protect rights of 1C Company and refrain from making copies of the software and documentation without prior written permission from 1C Company. © 1C, JSC, 1996 – 2010 1C Corporation, Moscow, 123056, P.O. 64 Sales Department: 21 Seleznevskaya St. Telephone: +7 (495) 737-92-57 Fax: +7 (495) 681-44-07 e-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.1c.ru, http://www.v8.1c.ru, http://www.v8.1c.ru/eng Software Development Group: A. Alekseev, A. Bezborodov, D. Beskorovainov, P. Vasilets, A. Vinogradov, A. Volkov, I. Golshtein, E. Gornostayev, G. Damie, O. Derut, D. Zaretsky, D. Ivashov, S. Kopienko, S. Kravtchenko, M. Leybovitch, G. Leontyev, A. Lekhan, A. Medvedev, A. Mitrophanov, E. Mitroshkin, S. Murzin, S. Nuraliev, D. Pavlenko, A. Plyakin, A. Rukin, D. Rusanov, D. Sluzhbin, A. Smirnov, P. Solodky, V. Sosnovsky, V. Tunegov, V. Philippov, V. Cheremisinov, P. Chikov, A. Chicherin, A. Shevtchenko. Documentation: V. Baidakov, V. Dranishchev, A. Krayushkin, I. Kuznetsov, M. Lavrov, A. Monichev, A. Plyakin, M. Radchenko, E. Tsagikyan. Technical Support Group: O. Akulova, O. Bagrova, O. Baklushina, S. Vostrikova, A. Garifullina, V. Davydova, O. Dmitryenko, L. Ermakova, U. Zhestkov, O. Zavalskaya, N. Zayavlina, M. Zvonilov, M. Ivanova, G. Korobka, U. Lavrova, S. Lepeshkina, S. Mazurin, S. Markov, V. Nikolayeva, A. Pavlikov, I. Panin, O. Pekhtereva, M. Polkanova, S. Postnova, A. Prokurovsky, E. Romanova, G. Stepanenko, N. Stepanov, T. Tokareva, E. Shirokova. QA Group: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Delibera Umbria Digitale S.C.A R.L. N. 248
    Delibera Umbria Digitale S.c.a r.l. n. 248 del 17/10/2019 OGGETTO: RDO all’interno del MePA per la fornitura di un servizio di manutenzione software dei sistemi ADWEB, SERENA e S.I.SO. presenti presso Regione Umbria, Arpal Umbria e USR Umbria. Nomina Commissione giudicatrice. Gara CIG 803015016A. L’Amministratore Unico Premesso che: - Con Delibera n. 239 del 23.08.2019 sono stati approvati gli atti per un’indagine di mercato volta a ricevere manifestazioni di interesse per la fornitura di un servizio di manutenzione software dei sistemi ADWEB, SERENA e S.I.SO. presenti presso Regione Umbria, Arpal Umbria e USR Umbria, con importo posto a base di gara pari a € 190.000,00 oltre Iva; - in pari data è stata pubblicata sulla piattaforma e-procurement “Portale Acquisti Umbria” disponibile al link https://app.albofornitori.it/alboeproc/albo_umbriadc l’indagine di mercato in oggetto; - il termine ultimo per la presentazione delle istanze di partecipazione è scaduto alle ore 13:00 del 10.09.2019; - in data 11.09.2019 il RUP procedeva con l’apertura in seduta riservata della busta contenente la documentazione richiesta costituita dall’istanza di partecipazione e dalle Dichiarazioni ex art. 80 D.lgs. 50/2016 e constatava la presenza di n. 3 istanze pervenute da parte di: 1. SMARTPEG SRL, C.F. e P.IVA 03460790540; 2. INTERSISTEMI ITALIA SPA, C. F. 08025010581 e P.IVA 01937781001; 3. GPI SPA, C.F. e P.IVA 01944260221; - riscontrata la completezza e la conformità della documentazione presentata, il RUP ha ammesso tutti i partecipanti (Verbale del RUP del 11.09.2019); - in data 26.09.2019 è stata pertanto predisposta la RDO n.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters Want Drawbridge
    Deep well Easter sunrise City says under review service it's prepared page 3 page 9 page 12 APRIL 1,1999 VOLUME 26 NUMBER 13 40 PAGES SANIBEL & CAPTIVA, PLORIDA Voters want drawbridge Hillebrandt wins city council race • By the numbers/page 4 council election • Poll positions/page 5 to replace George By Gwenda Hiett-Clements Madison who News Editor and resigned. ' l§||ilNBlL» Pattie Pace Hillebiandt ililllHHRi Staff Writer was to be on the Pattie Pace job quickly. He Sanibel voters ovciwhelmingly was sworn in at ABOVE: Bob Laswell, standing, supported keeping the Sanibel 9 a.m. chats with Bill Phillips, treasurer Causeway with a drawbridge in Wednesday just of BIG Arts, who provided advice Tuesday's referendum and also prior to his first Hillebrandt and guidance and hosted a meet- chose Bill Hillebrandt hands down council session, and-greet coffee for the candi- as their next city councilmcmbcr. a special meeting to discuss the date. Forty-one peiccnt ot lslanUcis causeway referendum results. voted in the special election and ot Throughout Tuesday evening, AT LEFT: Tina and Bill those, 01 peicent voted in lavoi oi mote than 100 oi lUUehumdtVsuyi- Hillebrandt react as Bob Wigley, keeping the causeway with a diaw- poitcis slopped by his home on his co-campaign manager, jumps bridge. The tally was l,fc>88 in lavor Woodnng Point to olfer then best for joy after announcing the compared «to. 163 or 9 percent wishes and ultimate congratulations results of Tuesday's election. against. • to the winning candidate. Hillebrandt captured 76 percent Seventy-six percent voted for Campaign manager Ginny of the votes in the city council Hillebrandt, who garnered 1,403 Fleming, who carried a portable race.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Issue 3
    » 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY » A LOOK INSIDE IARPA » GEOINT 2016 RECAPS 2016 ISSUE 3 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED STATES GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE FOUNDATION MACHINEBIG LEARNING, UNDERSTANDING 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY (SEE BACK C0VER) HOW WILL THE IC HARNESS ADVANCEMENTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? MANAGE YOUR DATA. DISCOVER ANSWERS. MAKE DECISIONS. Analysts in today’s world are expected to have the right information at their fingertips to answer urgent questions at a moment’s notice. JagwireTM allows analysts to spend less time searching for the right data and more time providing answers for time-critical operations. harrisgeospatial.com/trajectory ©2016 Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Harris Corporation. All rights reserved. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Image courtesy of DoD. Use of DoD images does not constitute or imply endorsement. CONTENTS 2016 ISSUE 3 02 | VANTAGE POINT Features 12 | ELEVATE Member feedback drives 14 NOVA Information USGIF’s marketing & | MACHINE LEARNING, Management School at communications team. BIG UNDERSTANDING How will the IC harness advancements the Universidade de Lisboa is the first international 04 | INTSIDER in artificial intelligence? GEOINT program NGA Director Cardillo By Melanie D.G. Kaplan on a new age of GEOINT; accredited by USGIF. IGAPP Grand Challenge winner 20 awarded; breaking ISIL’s brand; | QUANTUM LEAPS 25 | MEMBERSHIP PULSE DARPA pushes boundaries of The Intelligence Advanced Textron Systems space technology. Research Projects Activity tackles Geospatial Solutions the IC’s most vexing problems. 06 | IN MOTION evolves proactively to By Jim Hodges Lundahl-Finnie Award and anticipate new trends. USGIF Awards winners announced; USGIF launches SPECIAL SECTION 27 | HORIZONS Universal GEOINT Certification 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY Reading List; Peer Intel; program; USGIF accredits Flip the magazine to the back cover to view James Madison University.
    [Show full text]
  • Portale ABACO – Autenticazione E Cifratura Dei Flussi
    Allegato 12 – Guida ABACO Portale ABACO – Autenticazione e cifratura dei flussi Sistema di gestione dei prestiti bancari a garanzia delle operazioni di credito dell’Eurosistema (Guida ABACO) - 2021.1 SOMMARIO 1 Scopo ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Il portale ABACO ..................................................................................................................... 4 3 Registrazione e autorizzazione delle utenze .............................................................................. 4 3.1 Registrazione delle utenze esterne. ............................................................................................. 5 3.2 Autorizzazione delle utenze. ....................................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Amministratore del Portale ABACO .................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Funzioni riservate all’Amministratore esterno ..................................................................... 6 4 Autenticazione, cifratura e firma dei flussi. .............................................................................. 8 4.1 Flussi in ingresso ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.1.1 Autenticazione .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]