Instauracio Studii: the Foundation of a Pearl of Powerful Learning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Instauracio Studii: the Foundation of a Pearl of Powerful Learning CHAPTER 1 Instauracio Studii: The Foundation of a Pearl of Powerful Learning The end of the beginning for the University of Cracow came in mid-summer 1400. Less than a decade and one-half before, King Władysław Jagiełło had been the pagan Grand Prince of the still unconverted Lithuanians. Now as the Christian ruler of Catholic Poland, he was presiding over the opening in Cracow of an institution which, in its several European permutations, was, as A.B. Cobban has noted,1 one of the most “valuable and fructifying bequests of the middle ages to the modern world.” On Monday 26 July, in the house he had purchased for the school, the king stood in the presence of learned dignitaries from throughout the kingdom and proclaimed the establishment of a studium in Cracow, where his predecessor Casimir the Great had sought to found one in the 1360s. Although his wife Jadwiga, herself ruler of Poland since 1384, had also been a fervent supporter of this reactivation, she had not lived to see it; she had died the year before. Thus it fell to the king to complete what she and he had begun. In his proclamation he decreed that in Cracow there should be A pearl of all powerful learning to produce men noteworthy for the ripe- ness of their judgment, clad in the splendours of the virtues and flourish- ing in diverse branches of study, and in that place let a plentiful spring of knowledge well up, from the abundance whereof all desirous of being imbued with learning may take a draught.2 1 A.B. Cobban, The Medieval Universities: their development and organization, (London: Methuen, 1975), 235. 2 CDUC, I, no. 16, 25–30, here 26. This charter is also printed in Najstarsze przywileje Uniwersytetu Krakowskiego / The Oldest Charters of the University of Cracow, edited with an introduction by Bożena Wyrozumska, ed. (Cracow: Biuro Jubileuszowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2000), 43–47; and, in the following item, 51–56. In the text above, I have utilized the translation of these words in Casimir’s documents of foundation (1364) found in University of Cracow, Documents Concerning Its Origins, with An Introduction by Leon Koczy (Dundee, Scotland: Millennium Poloniae Christianae, 1966), 81. Jagiełło’s document draws upon the earlier decree verbatim at this point. This Dundee volume was prepared by the Polish diaspora in Scotland to celebrate the millennium of Polish Christianity in 1966. It is revealing of the values of this émigré community, whose presence abroad was due to events of the Second World War and © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/97890043�60�9_003 Instauracio Studii 11 From this act and those to follow in the next days, the school in Cracow even- tually come to honor Jagiełło as its greatest benefactor, and today it is known as the Jagiellonian University (Universitas Jagellonica, Uniwersytet Jagielloński), proudly bearing the name of its second founder.3 The details of this founda- tion represent the culmination of a process whose roots lie in the university tradition of the middle ages sketched in the Introduction to this study. But they have their source equally in the Casimiran era of the previous century and in late fourteenth century attempts to bring about the instauracio studii that was successfully accomplished in Jagiełło’s lifetime. This chapter is devoted to these latter two elements and the details of the foundation of 1400. The Casimiran Foundation According to a long-standing historiographical tradition, Casimir the Great, King of Poland from 1333 to 1370, had recognized early in his reign the impor- tance of university education for the welfare of his kingdom. Spurred by the example of Emperor Charles IV, who with papal support had founded his own university in Prague in 1347, Casimir dispatched Chancellor Florian Mokrski of Łęczyca, who had studied canon law in Padua and was one of his most trusted the subsequent establishment of Communism in Poland, that it should choose to mark the millennium by reference to the establishment of an institution of higher learning. 3 Son of Lithuanian Grand Prince Algirdas (Polish Olgierd), King Władysław was born in 1348. He ruled Lithuania as Grand Prince from 1377 to 1401 under his Lithuanian name Jogaila, but this was eventually Polonized to Jagiełło after he converted to Catholic Christianity and married the Polish ruler Jadwiga in 1386. At that time he adopted the Christian name Władysław (Wladislaus). For his biography see, among much else, the following: Małgorzata Duczmal, Jagiellonowie. Leksykon biograficzny (Cracow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1996), 461– 478; Urszula Borkowska, Dynastia Jagiellonów w Polsce (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2011), 36–46; and Jadwiga Krzyżaniakowa and Jerzy Ochmański, Władysław II Jagiełło (Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1990). For the appellation “Jagiellonian” as applied to the Cracow Studium, note that the king is designated first among the secular personages listed in the “Nota modum et ordinem petendi pro benefactoribus Universitatis” (MS Cracow, BJ 258, f. 2), printed in Album Studiosorum, 1, 8–9 and Metryka, 1, 5–6, where he is identified as “funda- tore et conservatore.” (Two other lay names above his have either been crossed out or, per- haps, added later.) The question of Jagiełło’s status as “founder,” which will be touched upon again in Chapter Three, is addressed by Krzysztof Stopka, “The Jagiellonian Foundation of Cracow University,” Quaestiones medii aevi novae 8 (2003): 49–66, the English version of his “Jagiellońska fundacja Uniwersytetu Krakowskiego,” Rocznik Krakowski 69 (2003): 35–46. The university was officially designated “Jagiellonian” in the Organic Statute of 1817, which gov- erned the Free City of Cracow that had been established at the Congress of Vienna..
Recommended publications
  • Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559
    Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559 Professional Experience 2015 – Present: River City Brass Band Principal Euphonium Player Key Responsibilities • Ensure a successful concert preparation for Euphonium and Baritone section • Playing solo performances with the band • Find substitute players in case of absence of assigned section member • Judge auditions for new players 2016 – Present River City Youth Brass Band Low Brass Instructor Key Responsibilities • Low brass sectional coaching • Full band coaching • Auditioning seat placements for low brass 2018 – Present Duquesne University Mary Pappert School of Music Adjunct Professor of Euphonium Key Responsibilities: • Teach one on one lessons to euphonium students or any other assigned brass students • Teach a studio class for low brass students • Prepare students for jury exams, auditions and end year recitals • Prepare students for ensemble assignments • Grade jury exams and recitals • Recruit new students • Judge euphonium applicant for school of music Education 2010 – 2014 Royal Northern College of Music in Manchester Bachelor in Euphonium Performance 2015 – 2017 Carnegie Mellon University Advanced Music Studies in Euphonium Performance, Orchestral Track Additional Qualifications 2006 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler 2007 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler, Marius Balcytis 2008 “Trakai Fanfare Week”,
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Crusades. Episode 280. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XIII
    History of the Crusades. Episode 280. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XIII. The Siege of Kaunas 1362. Hello again. Last week, we saw an effort by the Archbishop of Prague to convert the Lithuanian leaders to Christianity fail spectacularly, with the two pagan brothers making outrageous demands in return for their baptism, then laughing at and mocking the delegation when they objected. The upshot of this event was that converting the Lithuanians to Christianity by peaceful means was now permanently off the table as a goal to be pursued, so the only option left on the table was to convert the pagans by force. The Teutonic Order then spent time and effort constructing a bunch of new castles in Samogitia, which would provide a larger, more permanent Latin Christian presence in the region. Then, in the spring of the year 1362, fighting men from across Prussia, along with crusaders from Germany, Italy and England, gathered in Prussia, ready to head to Samogitia. This was to be a major Crusading expedition. William Urban describes it in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" as being a, and I quote, "huge force" end quote. Now you will notice that the Crusaders are departing in spring, not winter. That's because they don't need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia. Why don't they need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia? Well, because they are sailing there. Yes, in a novel break from tradition, the Grand Master and the Marshall of the Teutonic forces have come up with a plan to get everyone on board ships.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Beginning of the 15Th
    THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE BEGINNING OF THE 15 TH CENTURY A er the death of Grand Duke Algirdas (1345–1377), his son Jogaila became the leader. In order to divert all a ention to the East, Jogaila signed a secret agreement with the Order, known as the Treaty of Dovydiškės, according to which the Order was free to a ack the lands belonging to Algirdas’ brother Kęstutis and his son, Vytautas. e Order informed Kęstutis of this agreement and in so doing initiated a civil war in Lithuania. At + rst, Kęstutis removed Jogaila from his seat of power, however, in 1382, Jogaila conquered Vilnius and imprisoned Kęstutis and Vytautas. Kęstutis was held prisoner in Krėva Castle, and was strangled by Jogaila’s servants. Vytautas managed to escape and sought protection with the Crusaders. Vytautas and Jogaila made peace in 1384, yet Jogaila once again failed to keep his promise to return Vytautas his fatherland, the Duchy of Trakai. In 1390–1392 Vytautas again appealed to the Order for assistance to go to war against Jogaila. Jogaila, who by now spent most of his time in Poland, could see that his appointed vicegerent, his brother Skirgaila, was unable to manage the internal opposition and so, once again made peace with Vytautas in 1392. at same year Vytautas became the actual leader of Lithuania, and o6 cially assumed this position in 1401. Wishing to reinforce Lithuania’s supremacy in the East – in the Ruzen and Tatars’ lands, Vytautas and the Order agreed on the Treaty of Salynas. According to this agreement, Vytautas relinquished Samogitia as far as Nevėžis and Kaunas as far as Rumšiškės to the Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941
    326 Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941 Giedrė Jankevičiūtė Vilnius Academy of Arts Maironio St. 6, LT-01124 Vilnius e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to discuss and reconstruct in general fe- atures the reality of the Vilnius artistic community from late autumn 1939 to June 1941. This period of less than two years significantly changed the configuration of the artistic community of the city, the system of institutions shaping the art scene as well as the artistic goals. It also brought forth new names and inspired new images. These changes were above all determined by political circumstances: the war that broke out in Poland on 1 September 1939; the ceding of Vilnius and the Vilnius region to Lithuania; two Soviet occupations: in the autumn of 1939 and June 1940, and the subsequent Nazi occupation a year later. The influence of politics on the art scene and the life of artists has been explored in institutional and other aspects by both Lithuanian and Polish art historians, but the big picture is not yet complete, and the general narrative is still under construction. A further aim of this paper is to highlight some elements that have not received sufficient atten- tion in historiography and that are necessary for the reconstruction of the whole. Some facts of cooperation or its absence among artists of various ethnicities are presented, and the question is raised on the extent to which these different groups were affected by Sovietisation, and what impact this fragmentation had on the city’s art scene.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lithuanian Nobility in the Late- Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Composition and Structure
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 7 2002 ISSN 1392-2343 pp. 1–22 THE LITHUANIAN NOBILITY IN THE LATE- FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES: COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE RIMVYDAS PETRAUSKAS ABSTRACT This paper presents a critical review of the historiographically dominant theory stating that the upper layer of the Lithuanian nobility formed its independent power only around the middle of the fifteenth century. The extant sources shed little light on the role of the nobility in the political processes of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. A complex of sources, more fully reflecting the specifics of the country, appeared only after the arrival of writing in Lithuania at the end of the fourteenth century. It was only in this period that the place of the nobles in the system of government became evident. Therefore, it is possible to speak about a distorted perspective, suggested by the early records. The paper presents a definition of the nobility and an analysis of the origin, composition and structure of the Lithuanian ruling élite in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Consequently it is possible to speak about the prerequisites of the rule of this social group and the duality of the power of the grand duke and the nobility. Two principal tendencies of the development of the Lithuanian nobility in the fifteenth century – personal continuity and internal transformation (family structure) – are distinguished. In Lithuanian historical models the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries have acquired the image of the epoch of ‘ducal Lithuania’. This was a period of the rule of the grand dukes Gediminas, Algirdas, Kęstutis, Jogaila and Vytautas.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Crusades. Episode 290. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XXII
    History of the Crusades. Episode 290. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XXII. Grand Master Konrad von Wallenrode. Hello again. Last week we followed the Crusaders on campaign to Lithuania, where the Crusaders attacked the Lithuanian town of Vilnius with the ultimate aim of securing the town, defeating Jogaila and Skirgaila, and elevating their man Vytautas to the position of ruler of Lithuania. None of these events came to pass, but it did result in one crusader, Henry Bolingbroke, the future King of England, drinking a lot of beer with his men. We also saw last week the death of Grand Master Konrad Zollner von Rothenstein and his replacement by another Konrad: Konrad von Wallenrode. Now, William Urban points out in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" that, as the current Grand Commander of the Teutonic Order, Konrad von Wallenrode was the obvious standout candidate to be elected as the next Grand Master. The Wallenrode family had played prominent roles inside the Teutonic Order for some time, and Konrad von Wallenrode had enjoyed success as Grand Commander. Despite this though, there were apparently significant misgivings inside the Teutonic Order about the appointment of Konrad von Wallenrode are to the position of Grand Master. Why? Well, because Konrad von Wallenrode was a military man, through and through. In fact, to say that Konrad von Wallenrode had little or no interest in religion wasn't too much of an exaggeration, and William Urban reports that Konrad took so little notice of priests and God that he was once accused of heresy. The worst fears of the religious men of the Order seemed to have been realised when, after being elected as Grand Master, one of Konrad von Wallenrode first acts was to reform the command structure inside the Order to increase his authority.
    [Show full text]
  • ALGIRDAS (Olgierd), Grand Duke of Lithuania (1345-77), Son of \Gedin\Inas, Father of \]Ogaua and '[^Vitrigaila
    PRIESTS. BISHOPS. 15 DUKES; ALGIRDAS (Olgierd), Grand Duke of Lithuania (1345-77), son of \Gedin\inas, father of \]ogaUa and '[^vitrigaila. He shared power with his brother Kfstutis: Vilnius and the eastern part of the country was Algirdas' domain, and Kfstutis reigned in Trakai, Samogitia and other western regions. Thus Algirdas was more concerned about relations with Russian duchies, while Kfstutis dealt with the Teutonic Order. Having lived an adventurous life, Kfstutis, a zealous supporter of pagan Lithuania, called "a heathen knight", enjoyed greater popularity than his brother. However, Algirdas was a more outstanding politician, thus in Algirdas' lifetime Kfstutis occupied only second place in the state. Q I: CtAlO It is known that in the year of Gediminas' death, Algirdas ruled Vitebsk and Krevo. His two wives - princess Maria of Vitebsk and prin• Grand Duke Algirdas of cess \luUanua of Tver - were Russian Orthodox. The majority of his Lilhuania. Artist J. Ozifblowski children adhered to the Russian Orthodox faith, but those who were born in Vilnius remained pagan, like their father. Algirdas annexed Kiev and many other Eastern Slavonic regions to Lithuania, waged war against the Grand Duke of Moscow Dmitry Donskoi and marched as far as the Kremlin. He founded an independ• ent Lithuanian Orthodox metropoly with the centre in Kiev. He defeated the Tartars at the Battle of Blue Waters (1363), participated in the strug• gle against the Teutonic knights with a demand to cede to Lithuania almost all of the ancient Prussian lands along with Konigsberg and a large part of Livonia. In Algirdas' times Lithuania became the largest and most likely strongest Central Eastern European power.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopias and Dystopias All Sessio
    CES Virtual 27th International Conference of Europeanists Europe’s Past, Present, and Future: Utopias and Dystopias All sessions are listed in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). June 2, 2021 1 Pre-Conference Side Events MONDAY, JUNE 14 Networking with Breakout Sessions (private event for fellows) 6/14/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM EDT Mandatory for all dissertation completion and pre-dissertation fellows Through the Science Lens: New Approaches in the Humanities 6/14/2021 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM Mandatory for all dissertation completion and pre-dissertation fellows Moderator: Nicole Shea, CES/Columbia University Speakers: Dominic Boyer - Rice University Arden Hegele - Columbia University Jennifer Edmond - Trinity College Territorial Politics and Federalism Research Network Business Meeting 6/14/2021 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM Business Meeting Chair: Willem Maas - York University TUESDAY, JUNE 15 Mellon-CES Keynote Discussion: Crises of Democracy 6/15/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 PM Keynote Sponsored by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Mandatory for all dissertation completion and pre-dissertation fellows Chair: Nicole Shea – Director, Council for European Studies Speakers: Eileen Gillooly - Executive Director, Heyman Center for the Humanities, Columbia University Jane Ohlmeyer - Professor of History at Trinity College and Chair of the Irish Research Council 2 European Integration and Political Economy Research Network Speed Mentoring Event 6/15/2021 10:30 AM to 2:30 PM Networking Event Chair: Dermot Hodson - Birkbeck, University of London Knowledge Production and
    [Show full text]
  • Algirdas Land.Sbergis« a Lithuanian Playwright In
    Algirdas Landsbergis: a Lithuanian playwright in exile Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Daubenas, Joseph Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 23:38:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554788 ALGIRDAS LAND.SBERGIS« A LITHUANIAN PLAYWRIGHT IN EXILE by Joseph Anthony Daubenas A Thesis Submitted to the. Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF DRAMA. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of • MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate. College. THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 7 4 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis, has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The Univer­ sity of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are: allowable without special permission, provided that accurate, acknowl­ edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Gratitude is expressed to Peter R» Marroney, Head, of the Department of Drama, for his inspiration in the writing of this thesis, Grateful acknowledgment is also made to William A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lithuanian-Polish Dispute and the Great Powers, 1918-1923 Peter Ernest Baltutis
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 2001 The Lithuanian-Polish dispute and the great Powers, 1918-1923 Peter Ernest Baltutis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Baltutis, Peter Ernest, "The Lithuanian-Polish dispute and the great Powers, 1918-1923" (2001). Honors Theses. 1045. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses/1045 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3082 00802 6071 r UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND THE LITHUANIAN-POLISH DISPUTE AND THE GREAT POWERS, 1918-1923 AN HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY PETER ERNEST BALTUTIS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 04MAY2001 The Lithuanian-Polish Dispute and the Great Powers, 1918-1923 In the wake of World War I, Europe was a political nightmare. Although the Armistice of 1918 effectively ended the Great War, peace in Eastern Europe was far from assured. The sudden, unexpected end of the war, combined with the growing threat of communist revolution throughout Europe created an unsettling atmosphere during the interwar period. The Great Powers-the victorious Allied forces of France, Great Britain, Italy, and the United States-met at Paris to reconstruct Europe. In particular, the Great Powers had numerous territorial questions to resolve.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 6 Article 5 Number 2 Volume 6, No. 2, 1985 1985 The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H. Hough III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hough, William J.H. III (1985) "The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 6 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol6/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 303 II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY ................................ 305 A. European Origins ............................... 305 B. Legal Development After the Peace of Westphalia 308 C. Title to Territory in the Colonial Era ............ 319 D. Post World War I Development .................. 321 E. Birth of the Stimson Doctrine of Nonrecognition of Forcible Seizure of Territory ..................... 326 III. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES ................. 351 A. Origins of the Baltic States ...................... 351 B. Independence of the Baltic States ................ 355 C. Soviet Invasion and Incorporation of the Baltic S ta tes .......................................... 369 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • “Jaksonas” from Lithuania to America
    “Jaksonas” From Lithuania to America Edward Jackson edited by Anthony Cianciarulo and Irene Jackson Henry December 2002 1 2 “Jaksonas” From Lithuania to America Edward Jackson edited by Anthony Cianciarulo and Irene Jackson Henry December 2002 3 4 INTRODUCTION summer the subject of memoirs arose in conversation with Tony Cianciarulo, and I gave him the draft to read. He not only read it When I came to the United States and learned the language, my but edited them. Later I copied some photos and added them to friends and acquaintances often asked about the circumstances of the draft and then forgot the entire thing. my arrival in this country. Occasionally I told the story to our daughter Irene, our son Ray, and many other people. But once in Marie Manson then sent us a book about her life, so I sent her the a while, questions about our life during the war would come up. draft of my memoirs, and she again encouraged me to finish Several times I had long conversations about the Civil War, them. United States history and World War II with my friend Jim Barrett, and the subject of our adventures in Europe during the In the fall and winter of 2002-2003, our daughter Irene and her ward would come up. Once while I was a member of the husband Bill visited us, and I decided to arrange the memoirs in a Northwest Kiwanis Club, I told the story as part of a program. new format of a half-size page. Irene took the entire thing into her hands, and scanned the photos into the text.
    [Show full text]