DOCSLIB.ORG

AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report John Doherty AIA Co-Chair | Patrick Zaccaria AIA Co-Chair AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report Abstract Airplanes, Commercial, Transport, Engines, Powerplant, Jet, Turbofan, Turboprop, Indications, Certification, Displays Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are endorsed by the members of the AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team (Appendix B) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the companies & agencies that they represent. Executive Summary The AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team was formed July 2001 in response to the FAA draft Harmonization Terms of Refer- ence (HTOR) 25.1305. The team was subsequently sanctioned by the AIA as the Powerplant Indications Task Team. The team includes representation from several Airframe Manufacturers, Engine Manufacturers and Regulatory Agencies. The AIA PITT was an active working group from late 2001 through mid-2006. After 2006 the team gradually prepared a team report via ad hoc team telecons. The team has provided: • A Powerplant Indications input to the Avionics Systems Harmonization Working Group (ASHWG) draft AC/AMC 25-11 Electronic Displays. Much of the AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team input was incorporated in revision AC25-11A released by the FAA in June, 2007 • A revision proposal to FAR/CS §25.1305 “Powerplant instruments”. The proposed §25.1305 allows for use of the exist- ing prescriptive list of powerplant indications (updated in some areas) or alternatively an objective-based approach for some or all powerplant indications. A notable addition to the prescriptive list is the requirement for an engine fail (sub- idle) indication. • Recommendations for a revision to FAR/CS §25.1549 “Powerplant and auxiliary power unit instruments”. §25.1549 requires revision to align with current accepted practices and to allow for alignment with crew alerting requirements of §25.1322. • Recommendations for a revision of AC20-88A, to align with current accepted practices and to allow for alignment with crew alerting requirements of §25.1322. AC20-88A is outdated relative to current design practice (i.e. glass flight decks). • Recommendations for a revision to FAR/CS §25.1337 “Powerplant instruments”. §25.1337 is in some cases redundant to other, existing regulations and in some cases outdated relative to current technology. In addition, §25.1337 is a mix of flammable fluid requirements, indications requirements and fire safety requirements. The AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team recommends that these different types of requirements be grouped appropriately within the Code of Federal Regulations. • A white paper intended for the FAA Engine and Propeller Directorate and EASA Engine Certification branch regarding “Engine Parameter Indication and Certification: The Integration of Engine TCDS Limits and Their Role in Aircraft Safety”. This paper addresses the current practice of treating all engine certification limits as safe operating limits and therefore marking their airplane indications with redlines and, in some cases, associating flight deck warnings lights or messages. This is often inconsistent with aircraft display philosophy and airplane certification requirements. • A response to HTOR 25.1305, and • A Team Report, which this document comprises. AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report Main Contributing Individuals and Organizations Individuals Organizations* Members Past & Present Pierre-Emmanuel Arnaud Airbus Arnaud Bonnet Airbus Patrick Zaccaria Airbus John Doherty Boeing Commercial Airplane Joseph Sikora Boeing Commercial Airplane Geof Armstrong Bombardier Braulio Medeiros Embraer Jairo Scherrer Embraer Sarah Knife General Electric Vladimir Lozovsky IAC AR Larry Carlisle Pratt & Whitney William Fletcher Rolls-Royce Barry Rohm (now retired) Rolls-Royce Yves Cousineau Transport Canada Robin Boning (now retired) UK Civil Aviation Authority Ann Azevedo US Federal Aviation Administration Bill Emmerling US Federal Aviation Administration Gary Horan US Federal Aviation Administration Hals Larsen (now retired) US Federal Aviation Administration Mike McRae (now retired) US Federal Aviation Administration Chip Queitzsch US Federal Aviation Administration Consultation Mike Young Pratt & Whitney Laurent Gruz European Aviation Safety Agency Ken Fontaine UK Civil Aviation Authority *Note: This list reflects the organization that the individual represented at the time during which they participated in the AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team. AIA Powerplant Indications Task Team Report Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 1. BACKGROUND: 5 1.1 Team Formation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Ground Rules ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 1.3 Safety Issue .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 1.4 Propulsion System Malfunction Plus Inappropriate Crew Response (PSM+ICR) .........................................8 1.5 Existing Regulations ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 1.6 Evolution of Technology .............................................................................................................................................................................................................10 1.7 Recommended Strategy ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................14 2. PROPOSALS 16 2.1 Proposed FAA and CS regulation §25.1305 Powerplant Indications ........................................................................16 2.2 Revise FAA and CS regulation §25.1549 and FAA AC 20-88A .........................................................................................20 2.3 Revise FAA and CS regulation §25.1337 Powerplant indications ..................................................................................22 2.4 Powerplant input to AC / AMC 25-11 ‘Electronic Displays’ ...................................................................................................22 2.5 Engine Limits and the Engine Type Certification Data Sheet (ETCDS) .....................................................................23 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 25 3.1 Response to FAA draft HTOR 25.1305 ...............................................................................................................................................................25 3.1.1 Low Fuel Indication ........................................................................................................................................................................................................25 3.1.2 Engine Failure Indication .........................................................................................................................................................................................25 3.1.3 Asymmetric Thrust/Power Indication ....................................................................................................................................................25 3.1.4 Additional Prescriptive Indications as Required by §25.1309(c) .....................................................................27 3.1.5 Engine Surge/Stall Indication ...........................................................................................................................................................................28 3.1.6 General, Modernization, and AC25-11”Electronic Displays” (1987) .........................................................29 3.2 Other Discussion Items ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................29 3.2.1 Auxiliary Power Unit Indications ...................................................................................................................................................................29
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Propeller Aerodynamics CONSTANT-SPEED PROPELLER
    Constant-speed propeller Centrifugal twisting force. This is the opposing force to the aerodynamic twist- ing moment. Because this force is greater, it tries to move the blades toward a reduced blade angle. A propeller is designed to withstand the effect of these forces, but the forces are nonetheless important factors in design and operation. The effect of these forces accu- mulates across the length of the blade with the greatest stress at the hub. As the rota- tional speed of the propeller increases, so too do the stresses acting upon it. Given the various forces acting upon a propeller, it is not difficult to understand the serious prob- lem associated with even small nicks or scratches that could weaken the integrity of the propeller. Propeller aerodynamics To understand how a propeller moves an aircraft through the air, it is necessary to look at it from an aerodynamic rather than a mechanical perspective. Figure 5-6 depicts the side view of a propeller detailing the blade path, blade chord, and relative wind. The illustration reveals two types of motion associated with the propeller blades: rota- tional and forward. As a blade moves downward, it simultaneously moves forward. This has a significant effect on the relative wind making it strike the blade at an angle that is between straight ahead and straight down. This angle that the relative wind strikes the blade is called the angle of attack. The relative wind hitting the descending blade is deflected rearward causing the dynamic pressure on the engine side of the blade to be greater than the pressure on the back of the blade.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranfield University Xue Longxian Actuation
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY XUE LONGXIAN ACTUATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM ON CIVIL AIRCRAFT SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING MSc by Research THESIS CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING MSc by Research THESIS Academic Year 2008-2009 XUE LONGXIAN Actuation Technology for Flight Control System on Civil Aircraft Supervisor: Dr. C. P. Lawson Prof. J. P. Fielding January 2009 This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science © Cranfield University 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. ABSTRACT This report addresses the author’s Group Design Project (GDP) and Individual Research Project (IRP). The IRP is discussed primarily herein, presenting the actuation technology for the Flight Control System (FCS) on civil aircraft. Actuation technology is one of the key technologies for next generation More Electric Aircraft (MEA) and All Electric Aircraft (AEA); it is also an important input for the preliminary design of the Flying Crane, the aircraft designed in the author’s GDP. Information regarding actuation technologies is investigated firstly. After initial comparison and engineering consideration, Electrohydrostatic Actuation (EHA) and variable area actuation are selected for further research. The tail unit of the Flying Crane is selected as the case study flight control surfaces and is analysed for the requirements. Based on these requirements, an EHA system and a variable area actuation system powered by localised hydraulic systems are designed and sized in terms of power, mass and Thermal Management System (TMS), and thereafter the reliability of each system is estimated and the safety is analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Propeller Operation and Malfunctions Basic Familiarization for Flight Crews
    PROPELLER OPERATION AND MALFUNCTIONS BASIC FAMILIARIZATION FOR FLIGHT CREWS INTRODUCTION The following is basic material to help pilots understand how the propellers on turbine engines work, and how they sometimes fail. Some of these failures and malfunctions cannot be duplicated well in the simulator, which can cause recognition difficulties when they happen in actual operation. This text is not meant to replace other instructional texts. However, completion of the material can provide pilots with additional understanding of turbopropeller operation and the handling of malfunctions. GENERAL PROPELLER PRINCIPLES Propeller and engine system designs vary widely. They range from wood propellers on reciprocating engines to fully reversing and feathering constant- speed propellers on turbine engines. Each of these propulsion systems has the similar basic function of producing thrust to propel the airplane, but with different control and operational requirements. Since the full range of combinations is too broad to cover fully in this summary, it will focus on a typical system for transport category airplanes - the constant speed, feathering and reversing propellers on turbine engines. Major propeller components The propeller consists of several blades held in place by a central hub. The propeller hub holds the blades in place and is connected to the engine through a propeller drive shaft and a gearbox. There is also a control system for the propeller, which will be discussed later. Modern propellers on large turboprop airplanes typically have 4 to 6 blades. Other components typically include: The spinner, which creates aerodynamic streamlining over the propeller hub. The bulkhead, which allows the spinner to be attached to the rest of the propeller.
    [Show full text]
  • Auxiliary Power Unit / Environmental Control Unit (APU/ECU) for the Multiple Launch Rocket System
    Auxiliary Power Unit / Environmental Control Unit (APU/ECU) for the Multiple Launch Rocket System Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) APU KEY FEATURES: − 8.5 kW 28 VDC Power Output − 18,500 BTU Net Cooling Capacity ECU Condenser GENERAL PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The MLS Auxiliary Power Unit brushless, permanent magnet conditions. /Environmental Control Unit generator. The generator system (APU/ECU) has been designed to output and Engine power is The APU gross weight is under provide electrical power and controlled by a variable speed 330 pounds with the ECU cooling to the MLRS tracked governor which, depending on weighing 150 lbs. The System vehicle. Both systems can operate system load, optimizes the engine provides 18,500 Btu/hr cooling independently of one another. The operating speed. The vapor cycle capacity and 8.5 kW at 28-vDC ECU is completely electrically air conditioning system is power output (with voltage ripple driven and can be operated from designed to be in compliance with independent of the engine speed the main engine alternators or the the current environmental or load at less than 100 mV APU. regulations using R-134a RMS). refrigerant and is capable of The power plant is a Hatz 2G-40 operating in severe desert air-cooled diesel engine with a conditions. Its power draw is 150 shaft mounted three-phase amps at 28-vDC at full load APU/ECU FOR MILITARY APPLICATIONS Auxiliary Power Unit / Environmental Control Unit (APU/ECU) for the Multiple Launch Rocket System Condenser Assembly APU Evaporator Assembly Overall APU/ECU Specifications: Exterior Dimensions (L x W x H)........................................…...........
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Incorporates Many Significant Technological Enhancements Derived from Predecessor Development Programs
    AIAA AVIATION Forum 10.2514/6.2018-3368 June 25-29, 2018, Atlanta, Georgia 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference F-35 Air Vehicle Technology Overview Chris Wiegand,1 Bruce A. Bullick,2 Jeffrey A. Catt,3 Jeffrey W. Hamstra,4 Greg P. Walker,5 and Steve Wurth6 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, United States of America The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II incorporates many significant technological enhancements derived from predecessor development programs. The X-35 concept demonstrator program incorporated some that were deemed critical to establish the technical credibility and readiness to enter the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) program. Key among them were the elements of the F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing propulsion system using the revolutionary shaft-driven LiftFan® system. However, due to X- 35 schedule constraints and technical risks, the incorporation of some technologies was deferred to the SDD program. This paper provides insight into several of the key air vehicle and propulsion systems technologies selected for incorporation into the F-35. It describes the transition from several highly successful technology development projects to their incorporation into the production aircraft. I. Introduction HE F-35 Lightning II is a true 5th Generation trivariant, multiservice air system. It provides outstanding fighter T class aerodynamic performance, supersonic speed, all-aspect stealth with weapons, and highly integrated and networked avionics. The F-35 aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Flight Autopower® for Hawker 800 Series Aircraft
    ® Safe Flight AutoPower For ® Hawker 800 Series Aircraft Chesterfield, MO 636-681-5600 Safe Flight AutoPower® Installed With Experience By West Star Aviation Safe Flight AutoPower® Installed With Experience By West Star Aviation The Mission To deliver the precise management of speed through the control of thrust during all phases of flight to maximize safety, performance and efficiency to the Hawker 800 series of aircraft. The Solution AutoPower® – the automatic throttle system (ATS) from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. In cruise, the Auto Throttle system is continuously Safe Flight pioneered the development of automatic throttle technology which is now monitoring and adjusting the power levers to standard equipment on most large and medium business jets. AutoPower® systems and offset acceleration due to fuel burn. This results components from Safe Flight are installed on more than 9,000 corporate, commercial, in a fuel saving of 3% or more depending on the length of the flight. and military aircraft worldwide. The Benefits From takeoff to touchdown, AutoPower® ATS is designed to provide precise air speed control and engine target settings. The results are significant performance and safety advantages ranging from reduced crew workload and improved situational awareness to greater passenger comfort and increased aircraft value. Operators also report a 3.5 percent increase in range with the system by better controlling speed at cruise and maximizing fuel burn. The AutoPower® system manages engine power by automatically moving the thrust levers, When the flight crew selects a lower altitude on keeping the pilot aware of the adjustments at all times. Overriding the throttles never takes the Proline 21 system, the Auto Throttle system more force than when the system is not engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Grips with A320 Family Performance Retention and Fuel Savings
    Flight Operations Support & Services Customer Services 1, rond-point Maurice Bellonte, BP 33 31707 BLAGNAC Cedex FRANCE Telephone (+33) 5 61 93 33 33 65 getting to grips with A320 Family performance retention and fuel savings Issue 2 - January 2008 Getting to grips with A320 Family Performance Preface Retention and Fuel Saving TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Scope .................................................................................................................... 4 2 Introduction....................................................................................................... 4 3 Industry issues................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Environmental Issues..........................................................................10 4 Initiatives ......................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................12 4.2 Operational Initiatives ........................................................................14 4.2.1 Aircraft operations ..............................................................................14 4.2.2 Cost index ...........................................................................................14 4.2.3 Fuel economy ......................................................................................15 4.2.3.1 Cruise speed.........................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Hydromatic Propeller
    HYDROMATIC PROPELLER International Historic Engineering Landmark Hamilton Standard The American Society of A Division of United Technologies Mechanical Engineers Windsor Locks, Connecticut November 8, 1990 Historical Significance The text of this International Landmark Designation: The Hamilton Standard Hydromatic propeller represented INTERNATIONAL HISTORIC MECHANICAL a major advance in propeller design and laid the groundwork ENGINEERING LANDMARK for further advancements in propulsion over the next 50 years. The Hydromatic was designed to accommodate HAMILTON STANDARD larger blades for increased thrust, and provide a faster rate HYDROMATIC PROPELLER of pitch change and a wider range of pitch control. This WINDSOR LOCKS, CONNECTICUT propeller utilized high-pressure oil, applied to both sides of LATE 1930s the actuating piston, for pitch control as well as feathering — the act of stopping propeller rotation on a non-functioning The variable-pitch aircraft propeller allows the adjustment engine to reduce drag and vibration — allowing multiengined in flight of blade pitch, making optimal use of the engine’s aircraft to safely continue flight on remaining engine(s). power under varying flight conditions. On multi-engined The Hydromatic entered production in the late 1930s, just aircraft it also permits feathering the propeller--stopping its in time to meet the requirements of the high-performance rotation--of a nonfunctioning engine to reduce drag and military and transport aircraft of World War II. The vibration. propeller’s performance, durability and reliability made a The Hydromatic propeller was designed for larger blades, major contribution to the successful efforts of the U.S. and faster rate of pitch change, and wider range of pitch control Allied air forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Aviation APU Engines
    The Market for Aviation APU Engines Product Code #F644 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 2 The Market for Aviation APU Engines 2011 - 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 The Competitive Environment...............................................................................................................................3 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................3 Table 1 - The Market for Aviation APU Engines Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020 ..................................................5 Table 2 - The Market for Aviation APU Engines Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020.................................................10 Figure 1 - The Market
    [Show full text]
  • Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes
    3 1176 01346 2362 ! NASA Contractor Report 3863 NASA-CR-386319850007383 Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes David L. Kohlman and James Hammer CONTRACT NAS1-16363 JANUARY 1985 N/ A NASA Contractor Report 3863 Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes David L. Kohlman and James Hammer Flight Research Laboratory University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas Prepared for Langley Research Center under Contract NAS1-16363 N/ A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical InformationBranch 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 2. NOMENCLATURE .............................................. 5 3. BASELINE CONFIGURATION ANALYSIS ........................... 7 3.1 Description of Baseline Configuration ................ 7 3.2 Effect of Aspect Ratio ............................... ii 3.3 Effect of Wing Loading ............................... 12 3.4 Effect of Wing Natural Laminar Flow .................. 15 3.5 Effect of Fuselage Drag .............................. 19 4. PROPULSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS ................................. 31 4.1 GATE Engine ........................................... 32 4.1.1 Description of Engine .......................... 32 4.1.2 GASP Engine Routine ............................ 33 4.2 Very Advanced Reciprocating Engine (Spark Ignited), (SIR) ............................... 36 4.3 Very Advanced Diesel
    [Show full text]
  • CESSNA 180-SCIMITAR.Pdf
    T O P P R Cessna 180 (Land or Amphibian) O With O-470-A, -J, -K, -L, -R, -S, -U engine P P E R F O R M A N C E C Basic Kit: 180 with the O-470-A, -J, -K, -L, -R, -S engine Part Number: C3F00025STP O 1 3-Bladed Propeller: PHC-C3YF-1RF/F7691 1 Polished Spinner: C-3535-1P N 1 STC Document Set: SA00852AT V Basic Kit: 180 with the O-470-U engine E Part Number: C3F00025STP*1 1 3-Bladed Propeller: PHC-C3YF-1RF/F7691 R 1 Polished Spinner: C-3535-1P 1 STC Document Set: SA00852AT S I O __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Aircraft Serial and registration numbers required when ordering N All Prices FOB Hartzell Propeller Inc. Prices do not include Ohio State Sales Tax Installation and Dynamic Balancing available at an additional charge S Telephone: (937) 778-5726 Option 2 / (800) 942-7767 Option 2 Fax: (937) 778-4215 Internet: www.hartzellprop.com Email: [email protected] T O P P R O CESSNA 180 P Applicable Models: All models (Land or Amphibian) *Note: a governor change may be required in some cases P Specifications: 78 inch diameter 3-bladed, scimitar, aluminum hub propeller 2400 hour / 6 year TBO E 75 pounds (propeller and spinner) Diameter reduction allowable to 77 inches R Replaces: Hartzell 82XF- 84 or 88 inch dia., 2-bladed steel hub prop F Diameter reduction allowable to 82.5 or 86 inches 1000 hours / 5 year TBO O McCauley 2A36C - 82 or 88 inch diameter 2-bladed propeller R Diameter reduction allowable to 80 or 86 inches 1000-1500 hours / 5 year TBO M McCauley 2A34C - 82
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Engine Operation and Malfunction
    Airplane Turbofan Engine Operation and Malfunctions Basic Familiarization for Flight Crews Chapter 1 General Principles Introduction the flight crew's understanding and Today's modern airplanes are powered working knowledge of airplane turbine by turbofan engines. These engines are engine operation and malfunctions to the quite reliable, providing years of trouble- topics and depth covered here. Upon free service. However, because of the completing this material, flight crews rarity of turbofan engine malfunctions, should understand that some engine and the limitations of simulating those malfunctions can feel and sound more malfunctions, many flight crews have severe than anything they have ever felt unprepared to diagnose engine experienced; however, the airplane is malfunctions that have occurred. still flyable, and the first priority of the flight crew should remain "fly the The purpose of this text is to provide airplane." straightforward material to give flight crews the basics of airplane engine Propulsion operational theory. This text will also provide pertinent information about malfunctions that may be encountered during the operation of turbofan- powered airplanes, especially those malfunctions that cannot be simulated well and may thus cause confusion. While simulators have greatly improved pilot training, many may not have been programmed to simulate the actual noise, vibration and aerodynamic forces that certain malfunctions cause. In addition, Fig 1 showing balloon with no escape path for it appears that the greater the sensations, the air inside. All forces are balanced. the greater the startle factor, along with greater likelihood the flight crew will try Propulsion is the net force that results to diagnose the problem immediately from unequal pressures.
    [Show full text]