DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 25.925

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 25.925 Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 25.925 speed of the engines, following the § 25.907 Propeller vibration and fa- inflight shutdown of all engines, is in- tigue. sufficient to provide the necessary This section does not apply to fixed- electrical power for engine ignition, a pitch wood propellers of conventional power source independent of the en- design. gine-driven electrical power generating (a) The applicant must determine the system must be provided to permit in- magnitude of the propeller vibration flight engine ignition for restarting. stresses or loads, including any stress (f) Auxiliary Power Unit. Each auxil- peaks and resonant conditions, iary power unit must be approved or throughout the operational envelope of meet the requirements of the category the airplane by either: for its intended use. (1) Measurement of stresses or loads [Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as through direct testing or analysis amended by Amdt. 25–23, 35 FR 5676, Apr. 8, based on direct testing of the propeller 1970; Amdt. 25–40, 42 FR 15042, Mar. 17, 1977; on the airplane and engine installation Amdt. 25–57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. for which approval is sought; or 25–72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, 1990; Amdt. 25–73, (2) Comparison of the propeller to 55 FR 32861, Aug. 10, 1990; Amdt. 25–94, 63 FR similar propellers installed on similar 8848, Feb. 23, 1998; Amdt. 25–95, 63 FR 14798, airplane installations for which these Mar. 26, 1998; Amdt. 25–100, 65 FR 55854, Sept. 14, 2000] measurements have been made. (b) The applicant must demonstrate § 25.904 Automatic takeoff thrust con- by tests, analysis based on tests, or trol system (ATTCS). previous experience on similar designs that the propeller does not experience Each applicant seeking approval for harmful effects of flutter throughout installation of an engine power control the operational envelope of the air- system that automatically resets the plane. power or thrust on the operating en- (c) The applicant must perform an gine(s) when any engine fails during evaluation of the propeller to show the takeoff must comply with the re- that failure due to fatigue will be quirements of appendix I of this part. avoided throughout the operational life [Amdt. 25–62, 52 FR 43156, Nov. 9, 1987] of the propeller using the fatigue and structural data obtained in accordance § 25.905 Propellers. with part 35 of this chapter and the vi- (a) Each propeller must have a type bration data obtained from compliance certificate. with paragraph (a) of this section. For (b) Engine power and propeller shaft the purpose of this paragraph, the pro- rotational speed may not exceed the peller includes the hub, blades, blade limits for which the propeller is certifi- retention component and any other cated. propeller component whose failure due (c) The propeller blade pitch control to fatigue could be catastrophic to the system must meet the requirements of airplane. This evaluation must include: §§ 35.21, 35.23, 35.42 and 35.43 of this (1) The intended loading spectra in- chapter. cluding all reasonably foreseeable pro- peller vibration and cyclic load pat- (d) Design precautions must be taken terns, identified emergency conditions, to minimize the hazards to the airplane allowable overspeeds and overtorques, in the event a propeller blade fails or is and the effects of temperatures and hu- released by a hub failure. The hazards midity expected in service. which must be considered include dam- (2) The effects of airplane and pro- age to structure and vital systems due peller operating and airworthiness lim- to impact of a failed or released blade itations. and the unbalance created by such fail- ure or release. [Amdt. 25–126, 73 FR 63345, Oct. 24, 2008] [Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as § 25.925 Propeller clearance. amended by Amdt. 25–54, 45 FR 60173, Sept. 11, 1980; Amdt. 25–57, 49 FR 6848, Feb. 23, 1984; Unless smaller clearances are sub- Amdt. 25–72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, 1990; Amdt. stantiated, propeller clearances with 25–126, 73 FR 63345, Oct. 24, 2008] the airplane at maximum weight, with 475 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:44 Mar 02, 2010 Jkt 220043 PO 00000 Frm 00485 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220043.XXX 220043 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR § 25.929 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–10 Edition) the most adverse center of gravity, and that during any reversal in flight the with the propeller in the most adverse engine will produce no more than flight pitch position, may not be less than idle thrust. In addition, it must be the following: shown by analysis or test, or both, (a) Ground clearance. There must be a that— clearance of at least seven inches (for (i) Each operable reverser can be re- each airplane with nose wheel landing stored to the forward thrust position; gear) or nine inches (for each airplane and with tail wheel landing gear) between (ii) The airplane is capable of contin- each propeller and the ground with the ued safe flight and landing under any landing gear statically deflected and in possible position of the thrust reverser. the level takeoff, or taxiing attitude, (2) Each system intended for inflight whichever is most critical. In addition, use must be designed so that no unsafe there must be positive clearance be- condition will result during normal op- tween the propeller and the ground eration of the system, or from any fail- when in the level takeoff attitude with ure (or reasonably likely combination the critical tire(s) completely deflated of failures) of the reversing system, and the corresponding landing gear under any anticipated condition of op- strut bottomed. eration of the airplane including (b) Water clearance. There must be a ground operation. Failure of structural clearance of at least 18 inches between elements need not be considered if the each propeller and the water, unless probability of this kind of failure is ex- compliance with § 25.239(a) can be tremely remote. shown with a lesser clearance. (3) Each system must have means to (c) Structural clearance. There must prevent the engine from producing be— more than idle thrust when the revers- (1) At least one inch radial clearance ing system malfunctions, except that it between the blade tips and the airplane may produce any greater forward structure, plus any additional radial thrust that is shown to allow direc- clearance necessary to prevent harmful tional control to be maintained, with vibration; aerodynamic means alone, under the (2) At least one-half inch longitudinal most critical reversing condition ex- clearance between the propeller blades pected in operation. or cuffs and stationary parts of the air- plane; and (b) For propeller reversing systems— (3) Positive clearance between other (1) Each system intended for ground rotating parts of the propeller or spin- operation only must be designed so ner and stationary parts of the air- that no single failure (or reasonably plane. likely combination of failures) or mal- function of the system will result in Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as unwanted reverse thrust under any ex- amended by Amdt. 25–72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, pected operating condition. Failure of 1990] structural elements need not be consid- § 25.929 Propeller deicing. ered if this kind of failure is extremely remote. (a) For airplanes intended for use (2) Compliance with this section may where icing may be expected, there be shown by failure analysis or testing, must be a means to prevent or remove or both, for propeller systems that hazardous ice accumulation on propel- allow propeller blades to move from lers or on accessories where ice accu- the flight low-pitch position to a posi- mulation would jeopardize engine per- tion that is substantially less than formance. that at the normal flight low-pitch po- (b) If combustible fluid is used for sition. The analysis may include or be propeller deicing, §§ 25.1181 through supported by the analysis made to 25.1185 and 25.1189 apply. show compliance with the require- § 25.933 Reversing systems. ments of § 35.21 of this chapter for the propeller and associated installation (a) For turbojet reversing systems— components. (1) Each system intended for ground operation only must be designed so [Amdt. 25–72, 55 FR 29784, July 20, 1990] 476 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:44 Mar 02, 2010 Jkt 220043 PO 00000 Frm 00486 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220043.XXX 220043 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MANUAL REVISION TRANSMITTAL Manual 146 (61-00-46) Propeller Owner's Manual and Logbook
    HARTZELL PROPELLER INC. One Propeller Place Piqua, Ohio 45356-2634 U.S.A. Telephone: 937.778.4200 Fax: 937.778.4391 MANUAL REVISION TRANSMITTAL Manual 146 (61-00-46) Propeller Owner's Manual and Logbook REVISION 3 dated June 2012 Attached is a copy of Revision 3 to Hartzell Propeller Inc. Manual 146. Page Control Chart for Revision 3: Remove Insert Page No. Page No. COVER AND INSIDE COVER COVER AND INSIDE COVER REVISION HIGHLIGHTS REVISION HIGHLIGHTS pages 5 and 6 pages 5 and 6 SERVICE DOCUMENTS LIST SERVICE DOCUMENTS LIST pages 11 and 12 pages 11 and 12 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES pages 15 and 16 pages 15 and 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS pages 17 thru 24 pages 17 thru 26 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION pages 1-1 thru 1-14 pages 1-1 thru 1-16 DESCRIPTION AND DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION OPERATION pages 2-1 thru 2-20 pages 2-1 thru 2-24 INSTALLATION AND INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL REMOVAL pages 3-1 thru 3-22 pages 3-1 thru 3-24 TESTING AND TESTING AND TROUBLESHOOTING TROUBLESHOOTING pages 4-1 thru 4-10 pages 4-1 thru 4-10 continued on next page Page Control Chart for Revision 3 (continued): Remove Insert Page No. Page No. INSPECTION AND INSPECTION AND CHECK CHECK pages 5-1 thru 5-24 pages 5-1 thru 5-26 MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES PRACTICES pages 6-1 thru 6-36 pages 6-1 thru 6-38 DE-ICE SYSTEMS DE-ICE SYSTEMS pages 7-1 thru 7-6 pages 7-1 thru 7-6 NOTE 1: When the manual revision has been inserted in the manual, record the information required on the Record of Revisions page in this manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Propeller Aerodynamics CONSTANT-SPEED PROPELLER
    Constant-speed propeller Centrifugal twisting force. This is the opposing force to the aerodynamic twist- ing moment. Because this force is greater, it tries to move the blades toward a reduced blade angle. A propeller is designed to withstand the effect of these forces, but the forces are nonetheless important factors in design and operation. The effect of these forces accu- mulates across the length of the blade with the greatest stress at the hub. As the rota- tional speed of the propeller increases, so too do the stresses acting upon it. Given the various forces acting upon a propeller, it is not difficult to understand the serious prob- lem associated with even small nicks or scratches that could weaken the integrity of the propeller. Propeller aerodynamics To understand how a propeller moves an aircraft through the air, it is necessary to look at it from an aerodynamic rather than a mechanical perspective. Figure 5-6 depicts the side view of a propeller detailing the blade path, blade chord, and relative wind. The illustration reveals two types of motion associated with the propeller blades: rota- tional and forward. As a blade moves downward, it simultaneously moves forward. This has a significant effect on the relative wind making it strike the blade at an angle that is between straight ahead and straight down. This angle that the relative wind strikes the blade is called the angle of attack. The relative wind hitting the descending blade is deflected rearward causing the dynamic pressure on the engine side of the blade to be greater than the pressure on the back of the blade.
    [Show full text]
  • Propeller Operation and Malfunctions Basic Familiarization for Flight Crews
    PROPELLER OPERATION AND MALFUNCTIONS BASIC FAMILIARIZATION FOR FLIGHT CREWS INTRODUCTION The following is basic material to help pilots understand how the propellers on turbine engines work, and how they sometimes fail. Some of these failures and malfunctions cannot be duplicated well in the simulator, which can cause recognition difficulties when they happen in actual operation. This text is not meant to replace other instructional texts. However, completion of the material can provide pilots with additional understanding of turbopropeller operation and the handling of malfunctions. GENERAL PROPELLER PRINCIPLES Propeller and engine system designs vary widely. They range from wood propellers on reciprocating engines to fully reversing and feathering constant- speed propellers on turbine engines. Each of these propulsion systems has the similar basic function of producing thrust to propel the airplane, but with different control and operational requirements. Since the full range of combinations is too broad to cover fully in this summary, it will focus on a typical system for transport category airplanes - the constant speed, feathering and reversing propellers on turbine engines. Major propeller components The propeller consists of several blades held in place by a central hub. The propeller hub holds the blades in place and is connected to the engine through a propeller drive shaft and a gearbox. There is also a control system for the propeller, which will be discussed later. Modern propellers on large turboprop airplanes typically have 4 to 6 blades. Other components typically include: The spinner, which creates aerodynamic streamlining over the propeller hub. The bulkhead, which allows the spinner to be attached to the rest of the propeller.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Service Manual
    Propeller Technical Manual Jabiru Aircraft Pty Ltd JPM0001-1 4A482U0D And 4A484E0D Propellers Propeller Technical Manual FOR 4A482U0D and 4A484E0D Propellers DOCUMENT No. JPM0001-1 DATED: 1st Feb 2013 This Manual has been prepared as a guide to correctly operate & maintain Jabiru 4A482U0D and 4A484E0D propellers. It is the owner's responsibility to regularly check the Jabiru web site at www.jabiru.net.au for applicable Service Bulletins and have them implemented as soon as possible. Manuals are also updated periodically with the latest revisions available from the web site. Failure to maintain the propeller, engine or aircraft with current service information may render the aircraft un-airworthy and void Jabiru’s Limited, Express Warranty. This document is controlled while it remains on the Jabiru server. Once this no longer applies the document becomes uncontrolled. Should you have any questions or doubts about the contents of this manual, please contact Jabiru Aircraft Pty Ltd. This document is controlled while it remains on the Jabiru server. Once this no longer applies the document becomes uncontrolled. ISSUE 1 Dated : 1st Feb 2013 Issued By: DPS Page: 1 of 32 L:\files\Manuals_For_Products\Propeller_Manuals\JPM0001-1_Prop_Manual (1).doc Propeller Technical Manual Jabiru Aircraft Pty Ltd JPM0001-1 4A482U0D And 4A484E0D Propellers 1.1 TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydromatic Propeller
    HYDROMATIC PROPELLER International Historic Engineering Landmark Hamilton Standard The American Society of A Division of United Technologies Mechanical Engineers Windsor Locks, Connecticut November 8, 1990 Historical Significance The text of this International Landmark Designation: The Hamilton Standard Hydromatic propeller represented INTERNATIONAL HISTORIC MECHANICAL a major advance in propeller design and laid the groundwork ENGINEERING LANDMARK for further advancements in propulsion over the next 50 years. The Hydromatic was designed to accommodate HAMILTON STANDARD larger blades for increased thrust, and provide a faster rate HYDROMATIC PROPELLER of pitch change and a wider range of pitch control. This WINDSOR LOCKS, CONNECTICUT propeller utilized high-pressure oil, applied to both sides of LATE 1930s the actuating piston, for pitch control as well as feathering — the act of stopping propeller rotation on a non-functioning The variable-pitch aircraft propeller allows the adjustment engine to reduce drag and vibration — allowing multiengined in flight of blade pitch, making optimal use of the engine’s aircraft to safely continue flight on remaining engine(s). power under varying flight conditions. On multi-engined The Hydromatic entered production in the late 1930s, just aircraft it also permits feathering the propeller--stopping its in time to meet the requirements of the high-performance rotation--of a nonfunctioning engine to reduce drag and military and transport aircraft of World War II. The vibration. propeller’s performance, durability and reliability made a The Hydromatic propeller was designed for larger blades, major contribution to the successful efforts of the U.S. and faster rate of pitch change, and wider range of pitch control Allied air forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes
    3 1176 01346 2362 ! NASA Contractor Report 3863 NASA-CR-386319850007383 Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes David L. Kohlman and James Hammer CONTRACT NAS1-16363 JANUARY 1985 N/ A NASA Contractor Report 3863 Design Study of Technology Requirements for High Performance Single-Propeller- Driven Business Airplanes David L. Kohlman and James Hammer Flight Research Laboratory University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas Prepared for Langley Research Center under Contract NAS1-16363 N/ A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical InformationBranch 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 2. NOMENCLATURE .............................................. 5 3. BASELINE CONFIGURATION ANALYSIS ........................... 7 3.1 Description of Baseline Configuration ................ 7 3.2 Effect of Aspect Ratio ............................... ii 3.3 Effect of Wing Loading ............................... 12 3.4 Effect of Wing Natural Laminar Flow .................. 15 3.5 Effect of Fuselage Drag .............................. 19 4. PROPULSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS ................................. 31 4.1 GATE Engine ........................................... 32 4.1.1 Description of Engine .......................... 32 4.1.2 GASP Engine Routine ............................ 33 4.2 Very Advanced Reciprocating Engine (Spark Ignited), (SIR) ............................... 36 4.3 Very Advanced Diesel
    [Show full text]
  • CESSNA 180-SCIMITAR.Pdf
    T O P P R Cessna 180 (Land or Amphibian) O With O-470-A, -J, -K, -L, -R, -S, -U engine P P E R F O R M A N C E C Basic Kit: 180 with the O-470-A, -J, -K, -L, -R, -S engine Part Number: C3F00025STP O 1 3-Bladed Propeller: PHC-C3YF-1RF/F7691 1 Polished Spinner: C-3535-1P N 1 STC Document Set: SA00852AT V Basic Kit: 180 with the O-470-U engine E Part Number: C3F00025STP*1 1 3-Bladed Propeller: PHC-C3YF-1RF/F7691 R 1 Polished Spinner: C-3535-1P 1 STC Document Set: SA00852AT S I O __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Aircraft Serial and registration numbers required when ordering N All Prices FOB Hartzell Propeller Inc. Prices do not include Ohio State Sales Tax Installation and Dynamic Balancing available at an additional charge S Telephone: (937) 778-5726 Option 2 / (800) 942-7767 Option 2 Fax: (937) 778-4215 Internet: www.hartzellprop.com Email: [email protected] T O P P R O CESSNA 180 P Applicable Models: All models (Land or Amphibian) *Note: a governor change may be required in some cases P Specifications: 78 inch diameter 3-bladed, scimitar, aluminum hub propeller 2400 hour / 6 year TBO E 75 pounds (propeller and spinner) Diameter reduction allowable to 77 inches R Replaces: Hartzell 82XF- 84 or 88 inch dia., 2-bladed steel hub prop F Diameter reduction allowable to 82.5 or 86 inches 1000 hours / 5 year TBO O McCauley 2A36C - 82 or 88 inch diameter 2-bladed propeller R Diameter reduction allowable to 80 or 86 inches 1000-1500 hours / 5 year TBO M McCauley 2A34C - 82
    [Show full text]
  • CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Martin Mccarthy CONTRA-ROTATING
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Martin McCarthy CONTRA-ROTATING OPEN ROTOR REVERSE THRUST AERODYNAMICS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING MSc by Research Academic Year: 2010 - 2011 Supervisor: Dr D.G.MacManus June 2011 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING MSc by Research Academic Year 2010 - 2011 MARTIN MCCARTHY CONTRA-ROTATING OPEN ROTOR REVERSE THRUST AERODYNAMICS Supervisor: Dr D.G.MacManus June 2011 © Cranfield University 2011. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. ABSTRACT Reverse thrust operations of a model scale Contra-Rotating Open Rotor design were numerically modelled to produce individual rotor thrust and torque results comparable to experimental measurements. The aims of this research were to develop an understanding of the performance and aerodynamics of open rotors during thrust reversal operations and to establish whether numerical modelling with a CFD code can be used as a prediction tool given the highly complex flowfield. A methodology was developed from single rotor simulations initially before building a 3D‘frozen rotor’ steady-state approach to model contra-rotating blade rows in reverse thrust settings. Two different blade pitch combinations were investigated ( β1,2 =+30˚,- 10˚ and β1,2 =-10˚,-20˚). Thrust and torque results compared well to the experimental data and the effects of varying operating parameters, such as rpm and Mach number, were reproduced and in good agreement with the observed experimental behaviour. The main flow feature seen in all the reverse thrust cases modelled, both single rotor and CROR, is a large area of recirculation immediately downstream of the negative pitch rotor(s).This is a result of a large relative pressure drop region generated by the suction surfaces of the negative pitch blades.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator's Manual, V4.Docx, Printed on 13/2/13
    Airmaster Propellers Ltd Ph: +64 9 833 1794 Airmaster Propellers Ltd 20 Haszard Rd, Massey Fax: +64 8326 7887 PO Box 374, Kumeu Email: [email protected] High Performance Propeller Systems Auckland, New Zealand Web: www.propellor.com AP3 SERIES AND AP4 SERIES CONSTANT SPEED PROPELLER OPERATOR’S MANUAL AP3&4 Series Operator's Manual, V4.Docx, printed on 13/2/13. OM3 r4 AP3&4 Series Operator's Manual Page 2 Revision control Revision Change Approved Date 1 Initial release MJE 21Dec2001 2 Content revision MJE 18Oct2006 3 Inclusion of 4 series MJE 12Feb2010 4 Inclusion of reversing models MJE 21Jan2013 OM3 r4 AP3&4 Series Operator's Manual Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 7 Part 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 7 Part 1.2. Use of This Manual .............................................................................. 7 Part 1.3. Warnings, Cautions and Notes ........................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 8 Part 2.1. Description of AP3xx & AP4xx Series Propellers ............................. 8 Part
    [Show full text]
  • SENSENICH THREE BLADE COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT PROPELLER INSTALLATION and OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS for UL POWER ENGINES DOC#: 3E0 Installation Instructions Rev0 6/16/17
    2008 Wood Court Plant City, FL 33563 USA Phone (813)752-3711 Fax (813)752-2818 Composite Aircraft Propellers http://www.sensenich.com/ SENSENICH THREE BLADE COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT PROPELLER INSTALLATION AND OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR UL POWER ENGINES DOC#: 3E0 Installation_Instructions_Rev0 6/16/17 ATTENTION Failure to follow these instructions will void all warranties, expressed and implied. Mounting difficulties, vibration, and/or failure can result with improper assembly of the propeller blades and hub parts. CAUTION Rotating propellers are particularly dangerous. Extreme caution must be exercised to prevent severe bodily injury or death. TABLE OF CONTENTS Propeller Packing List – 3E0 2 FIG 1. Propeller Assembly 2 Propeller Description and Features 3 Required Tools 3 Propeller Installation 4 FIG 2. Nord-Lock Lock Washer 4 FIG 3. Pitch Setting Gage 4 Re-pitching 5 Propeller Removal 6 Propeller Performance 6 Pitch Notes and Limitations 6 Tachometer Inspection 7 TABLE 1: Installation Torque for Mounting and Clamping Hardware 7 TABLE 2: Approved Engine / Propeller Combinations and Limitations 7 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) 8 Inspections 9 Repair s 11 FIG 4. Minor Hub Repair Limits 12 Limited Warranty 12 Propeller Logbook 13 3E0_Installation_Instructions_Rev0-ode-2017-12- 11.docx 1 PACKING LIST FOR 3E0 INSTALLATION WITH CONTINENTAL THREADED FLANGE BUSHINGS Item Description Qty Item Description Qty 1 Hub Mount Half 1 5 Clamp Bolts 3/8”-24 x 1.75” 6 2 Inner Mount Bolts 3/8”-24 x 1.75” 3 6 Locking Washer NL3/8”SP Nord-lock 12 3 Composite Blades 3 7 Outer Mount Bolt 3/8”-24 x 4.50” 3 4 Hub Cover Half 1 FIGURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • OX-5S to Turbo-Compounds: a Brief Overview of Aircraft Engine Development by Kimble D
    OX-5s to Turbo-Compounds: A Brief Overview of Aircraft Engine Development By Kimble D. McCutcheon During the period between the World Wars, aircraft POWER-TO-WEIGHT RATIO engines improved dramatically and made possible Secondly, aircraft engines must produce as much power unprecedented progress in aircraft design. Engine as possible while weighing as little as possible. This is development in those days, and to a large extent even usually expressed in terms of pounds per horsepower today, is a very laborious, detailed process of building an (lb/hp). One way to make an engine more powerful is to engine, running it to destruction, analyzing what broke, make it bigger, but this also makes it heavier. Moreover, designing a fix, and repeating the process. No product if you shave away metal to make it lighter, parts start to ever comes to market without some engineer(s) having crack, break, and generally become less reliable. You spent many long, lonely, anxious hours perfecting that can see the conflicting objectives faced by the engineer. product. This is especially true of aircraft engines, which Another option is to get more power from a given size. by their very nature push all the limits of ingenuity, Engine size is usually expressed in cubic inches (in³) or materials, and manufacturing processes. liters of swept volume (the volume displaced by all the Aircraft Engine Requirements and pistons going up and down). If you can make an engine Measures of Performance get more horsepower per cubic inch (hp/in), then you have made it lighter. The OX-5 displaced 503 in³, In order to compare engines, we must discuss the weighed about 390 lb and produced 90 HP (0.18 hp/in, special requirements of aircraft engines and introduce 4.33 lb/hp).
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Variable Pitch, Energy-Harvesting Propeller for In-Flight Power Recuper- Ation on Electric Aircraft
    Design of a Variable Pitch, Energy-Harvesting Propeller for In-Flight Power Recuper- ation on Electric Aircraft J.M.F.van Neerven Technische Universiteit Delft DESIGNOFA VARIABLE PITCH, ENERGY-HARVESTING PROPELLER FOR IN-FLIGHT POWER RECUPERATION ON ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT by J.M.F.van Neerven in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Monday November 30, 2020 at 14:00 PM. Student nr.: 4231899 Supervisor: Dr. ir. T. Sinnige Thesis committee: Dr. ir. T. Sinnige, TU Delft Prof. dr. ir. G. Eitelberg, TU Delft Prof. dr. ir. Simao Ferreira, TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. PREFACE This research project about energy recuperation technology on electric aircraft concludes my Master of Sci- ence in Aerospace Engineering at Delft University of Technology. Energy harvesting on electric aircraft is a relatively new research area which is under rapid development, with the main aim to improve the energy per- formance of these aircraft. This report presents the findings regarding the influence a constant/variable pitch and/or RPM propeller on an electric aircraft on the overall energy consumption over a complete mission. I would like to thank several people who contributed to this achievement. First of all, I would like to thank Tomas Sinnige and Leo Veldhuis, who supervised me during the project, for providing excellent feedback and being very attentive and supportive at all times. Furthermore, I would like to thank all the basement students in the HSL for always ensuring a motivational and social study environment.
    [Show full text]