Highways Agency Project Support Framework A63 Castle Street Improvements, Hull

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highways Agency Project Support Framework A63 Castle Street Improvements, Hull Highways Agency Project Support Framework A63 Castle Street Improvements, Hull Scheme Assessment Report (Options Selection Stage) Document Reference: W11189/T11/05 Final Rev 6 FEBRUARY 2010 HIGHWAYS AGENCY PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (OPTIONS SELECTION STAGE) FEBRUARY 2010 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS – HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (OPTIONS SELECTION STAGE) FEBRUARY 2010 Revision Record Revision Ref Date Originator Checked Approved Status 1 14/12/09 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 2 08/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 3 13/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 4 25/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final 5 17/02/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final 6 26/02/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final This report is to be regarded as confidential to our Client and it is intended for their use only and may not be assigned. Consequently and in accordance with current practice, any liability to any third party in respect of the whole or any part of its contents is hereby expressly excluded. Before the report or any part of it is reproduced or referred to in any document, circular or statement and before its contents or the contents of any part of it are disclosed orally to any third party, our written approval as to the form and context of such a publication or disclosure must be obtained. Prepared for: Prepared by: Highways Agency Pell Frischmann Consultants Ltd Major Projects National George House Lateral George Street 8 City Walk Wakefield Leeds WF1 1LY LS11 9AT Tel: 01924 368 145 Fax: 01924 376 643 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1. BRIEF ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. EXISTING PROBLEMS ................................................................................ 2 1.3. SCHEME DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT HISTORY ........................ 2 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 6 2.1. DESCRIPTION OF LOCALITY ..................................................................... 6 2.2. EXISTING HIGHWAY NETWORK ................................................................ 6 2.3. TRAFFIC FORECASTS ................................................................................ 9 2.4. ACCIDENTS AND JOURNEY TIME RELIABILITY ......................................10 2.5. LAND USE ..................................................................................................12 2.6. DRAINAGE ..................................................................................................13 2.7. GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................14 2.8. PUBLIC UTILITIES ......................................................................................14 2.9. ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................................................15 3. PLANNING FACTORS .........................................................................................47 3.1. OPTION CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................47 3.2. SCHEME OPTIONS CONSIDERED ............................................................47 3.3. PREFERRED OPTIONS .............................................................................48 3.4. NON-PREFERRED OPTIONS ....................................................................51 4. CONSEQUENCES OF THE “DO-NOTHING” SCENARIO ....................................55 4.1. REQUIREMENT FOR THE SCHEME .........................................................55 4.2. IMPORTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL GATEWAYS – PORT OF HULL .......56 4.3. LOCAL POLICIES .......................................................................................57 4.4. ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT ...................................................................58 4.5. SUMMARY OF CONSEQUENCES .............................................................60 5. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE SCHEMES .........................................................61 5.1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................61 5.2. UNDERGROUND OPTION - PREFERRED ................................................61 5.3. OVERGROUND OPTION - PREFERRED ...................................................64 5.4. UNDERGROUND LANDBRIDGE - NON PREFERRED ..............................66 5.5. UNDERGROUND CUT AND COVER TUNNEL - NON PREFERRED .........70 5.6. OVERGROUND LANDBRIDGE - NON PREFERRED .................................73 5.7. OVERGROUND EXTENDED VIADUCT - NON PREFERRED ....................76 6. ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC, ECONOMICS AND COSTS ..................................80 6.1. TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT ............................................................................80 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) 6.2. ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT........................................................................81 7. HIGHWAYS DESIGN DATA .................................................................................90 7.1. ROAD LAYOUT AND STANDARDS - DESIGN ELEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS ..........................................................................................90 8. ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN DATA ......................................................................92 8.1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................92 8.2. AIR QUALITY ..............................................................................................92 8.3. CULTURAL HERITAGE ..............................................................................96 8.4. TOWNSCAPE ........................................................................................... 104 8.5. NATURE CONSERVATION ...................................................................... 120 8.6. MATERIALS .............................................................................................. 129 8.7. NOISE ....................................................................................................... 130 8.8. EFFECT ON ALL TRAVELLERS ............................................................... 131 8.9. COMMUNITY AND PRIVATE ASSETS ..................................................... 132 8.10. ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ........................... 135 9. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION ......................................................... 137 9.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 137 9.2. CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................ 137 9.3. CONSULTATION MATERIAL .................................................................... 137 9.4. EXHIBITION PUBLICITY ........................................................................... 139 9.5. RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...................................... 140 9.6. SUMMARY OF QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ..................................... 141 9.7. CORRESPONDENCE FROM INDIVIDUALS ............................................ 145 9.8. PUBLIC EXHIBITION COMMENTS ........................................................... 146 9.9. SUMMARY OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS‟ RESPONSES ............................. 147 9.10. ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED ................................................................... 150 9.11. CONCLUSIONS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ................................ 151 9.12. POST PUBLIC CONSULTATION OPTION ................................................ 153 10. CONSULTATION (IN CONFIDENCE) ................................................................ 154 10.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 154 10.2. VALUE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP ...................................................... 154 10.3. AIR QUALITY CONSULTATION ............................................................... 155 10.4. CULTURAL HERITAGE ............................................................................ 155 10.5. ECOLOGY ................................................................................................. 158 10.6. LANDSCAPE/TOWNSCAPE ..................................................................... 159 10.7. WATER ..................................................................................................... 159 10.8. NETWORK OPERATIONS DIVISION ....................................................... 160 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) 11. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 162 11.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 162 11.2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT .......... 162 11.3. COMPARISON OF OPTIONS ................................................................... 163 11.4. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS .......................................................................... 168 12. RECOMMENDED
Recommended publications
  • Humber Bridge Strategic Plan 1 April 2018
    HUMBER BRIDGE STRATEGIC PLAN 1 APRIL 2018 - 31 MARCH 2021 Contents PAGE 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Strategic Overview 3 - 8 3. Mission Statement 9 - 11 4. Strategic Objectives 12 – 17 5. Staffing 18 - 20 6. Finance 21 - 24 7. The Future 25 1 1. Executive Summary The Humber Bridge has been a highly successful toll bridge and a key part of the transport infrastructure of the Humber region, since it opened in 1981. From 1981 to 1998 the Humber Bridge was the longest single span bridge in the world, making it a global icon of British engineering achievement. It remains the longest bridge in the world that you can cycle and walk across. It is a bridge that can be enjoyed at leisure, not purely as the quickest route across the Humber Estuary. Our aim over the next three years is to build on this success. We are ‘creating the best bridge experience in the world’. The Humber Bridge will offer the best bridge experience in the world to all our customers, whether crossing the Bridge by motorised vehicles, bicycles and on foot, or visiting the Bridge as a tourist attraction. We will continue to ensure and improve a safe and sustainable crossing for all our users. We will also aim to enable visitors to explore the Humber Bridge as a world-class visitor attraction. Our strategic objectives for 2018 to 2021 are to: 1. Improve the experience of customers, while maintaining the tolls at current prices 2. Maximise and diversify our income and minimise our expenditure 3. Develop a world class visitor experience This Strategic Plan is structured as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Details to the Location
    A165 A614 A164 A1079 A1035 Public Transport A19 A1079 A163 A1174 By Rail, Hull Station. A1034 A614 A1079 A165 Approximately 15 minutes taxi ride away. A164 A63 38 Kingston Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Training Centre UK For information on train operators and times phone Selby M62 A63 Upon Hull Logistics Warehouse, Captain Don Ellerby Way, Alexandra Dock, Hull, HU9 1BT National Rail Enquiries on 0845 7484950. 37 A63 A19 HUMBER BRIDGE A1033 Tel: +44 (0)1482 Please advise 36 TOLL APPLIES www.siemens.com By Air, Humberside Airport. 34 35 Goole M62 A1077 A161 Approximately 25 minutes drive away, via the Humber A15 *NOTE: For navigation systems please note that the post code should not be used. M18 A1077 A180 Bridge (toll fee applies) A1 Please input Lockwood Shipping Limited into your navigation system and this should guide you to the site. Grimsby A19 Scunthorpe 5 5 1 M181 M180 A1033 TO M180 2 A18 3 4 BEVERLEY Doncaster A1084 (M6) (M62) (M57) City centre A165 M18 A161 Leeds 3 Knotty Ash A5047 A1084 Humber Bridge A159 A15 A165 TO A638 A46 WavetreeDocks B5179 BRIDLINGTON A1(M) A1033 (A63) A631 Gainsborough York Beverley A1033 A631 NORTHERN GATEWAY (M62) Leeds T NORTHERN GATEWAY Humber Bridge A1033 S Bridlington City Centre York, Beverley The Deep D A 1 Withernsea, Hedon N 0 A1033 3 SOUTHCOATES Queen Elizabeth Dock A 3 NORTHERN GATEWAY Alexandra Dock L ROUNDABOUT King George Dock E Withernsea (M62) Ferry Terminal V D Hedon A1033 Leeds E R King George Dock Humber Bridge A1033 Ferry Terminal L Ferry Terminal City Centre King George Dock C Ferry
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Government the Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report
    Welsh Government The Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report 216322 Issue | 30 May 2012 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 216322 ISBN 978 0 7504 8034 5 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 4 Pierhead Street Capital Waterside Cardiff CF10 4QP United Kingdom www.arup.com Welsh Government The Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Severn Crossings and the Welsh Economy 1 1.3 Study Objectives 3 2 Study Approach 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Literature review 5 2.3 Traffic and transport modelling 5 2.4 Impacts of toll on businesses and consumers 6 2.5 Econometric modelling 6 3 Traffic and Travel Patterns 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Traffic Volumes and Travel Patterns 7 3.3 Travel Patterns 10 3.4 Journey Times 11 3.5 Severn Crossing Toll Rates and Revenue 12 3.6 Tolls and Total Journey Costs 13 3.7 Trends in Transport Costs 15 3.8 Commuting Patterns and the Severn Crossings 17 4 Evidence from Toll Roads Elsewhere 20 4.1 Introduction 20 4.2 Effects on Traffic and Transport – The Toll Price Elasticity of Demand 20 4.3 Economic Effects of Tolled Infrastructure 24 5 Impacts on Traffic and Transport 26 5.1 Introduction 26 5.2 Behavioural Responses to Toll Penalties 26 5.3 Determinants of Toll Responses 26 5.4 Modelling Framework 28 5.5 Impacts of Traffic Flows
    [Show full text]
  • From Partnership to Limited Company 1869-1908
    FROM PARTNERSHIP TO LIMITED COMPANY The Story of John Good & Sons Ltd – 175 YEARS OF A FAMILY BUSINESS 12 1869-1908 John Good’s modest ship-owning interests The new business took the name Good An illustration of the obviously stimulated his sons to follow his Brothers & Co, ostensibly because Good & opening of Hull's Albert Dock by the Prince & example, except on a more ambitious scale in Reckitt hardly seemed appropriate for a shipping Princess of Wales in keeping with the emergence of the larger, faster firm, but perhaps the Reckitts wished to mask 1869. (Courtesy of Hull steam ships. In the autumn of 1870 John Good their own involvement. The Carolina was joined Maritime Museum.) noted that Francis and James (later Sir James) in January 1871 by the even larger and more 3 Reckitt, from the Quaker family which had expensive Mont Cenis, 930 tons, 140 bhp and created one of Hull’s most important businesses, costing £30,000 to equip for the sea. The Carolina had approached Joseph and Thomas and asked carried mails to the Cape under Captain MacGarr, whether they would consider a partnership as bringing back cargoes such as cotton seed from steam ship owners. The brothers agreed and, after Alexandria in Egypt, while the Mont Cenis plied at an abortive attempt to acquire a new steamer built first between the UK and India. The life of both in Sunderland, Joseph, with an engineer, travelled vessels was short. On 20 November 1872 the to Holland and bought the 733 ton, 130 bhp Carolina foundered in the North Atlantic on her steamer Carolina, for £16,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber Area Local Aggregate Assessment
    OCTOBER 2019 (Data up to 2018) HUMBER AREA LOCAL AGGREGATE ASSESSMENT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Development Plans 4 Spatial Context 5 Environmental Constraints & Opportunities 6 2. GEOLOGY & AGGREGATE RESOURCES 8 Bedrock Geology 8 Superficial Geology 9 Aggregate Resources 10 Sand and Gravel 10 Chalk & Limestone 11 Ironstone 11 3. ASSESSMENT OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND 12 Sand & Gravel 12 Crushed Rock 14 4. AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION & MOVEMENTS 16 Consumption 16 Imports & Exports 18 Recycled & Secondary Aggregates 19 Marine Aggregates 23 Minerals Infrastructure 25 6. FUTURE AGGREGATE SUPPLY AND DEMAND 28 Managed Aggregate Supply System (MASS) 28 Approaches to Identifying Future Requirement 29 Potential Future Requirements 34 7 CONCLUSION 36 Monitoring and Reviewing the Local Aggregates Assessment 37 Consideration by the Yorkshire and Humber Aggregates Working Party 37 APPENDIX 1: YHAWP CONSULTATION RESPONSES TO A DRAFT VERSION OF THIS LAA, THE COUNCILS’ RESPONSE, AND ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE DOCUMENT AS A RESULT. 41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The requirement to produce an annual Local Aggregate Assessment (LAA) was introduced through the publication of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in March 2012 and is still a requirement set out in the revised NPPF (2019). The Government issued further guidance on planning for minerals in the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG), incorporating previous guidance on the Managed Aggregate Supply System (MASS). This report is the sixth LAA that aims to meet the requirements set out in both of these documents. It is based on sales information data covering the calendar years up to 2018. Landbank data is 2018-based. Sales and land bank information is sourced from annual surveys of aggregate producers in the Humber area (East Riding of Yorkshire, Kingston upon Hull, North East Lincolnshire & North Lincolnshire), alongside data from the Yorkshire & Humber Aggregates Working Party Annual Monitoring Reports, planning applications, the Crown Estate, and the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Stormwater Lagoon Hull
    Future of Stormwater Lagoon Hull LAGOON HULL A1165 N HULL 1km River front development A1033 opportunity areas BALANCED Victoria Dock Consent ready outer A63 harbour development 26-41% REDUCTION IN New four lane highway TRAFFIC ON THE A63 (9.6km) Outer harbour DEFENCE (2km!) 100% The ambitious Lagoon Hull project aims to protect Hessle IMPOUNDED LAGOON (5KM!) Tidal flood protection the city from flooding, while improving transport for at least 100 years connectivity and reinvigorating the local economy. Y £300M U A R Journey time savings Nadine Buddoo reports. E S T E R M B 1,600 100% THROUGH TRAFFIC H U MOVED TO LAGOON ROAD Construction jobs ull is one of the cities estuary – on the southern edge of in the UK which are Hull – compounds its vulnerability £1bn Gross value added most vulnerable cities KEY FACTS to flooding. per annum to coastal flooding “The city is almost trapped by Bridge Humber and rising sea levels. £1.5bn water,” says Hatley. “There has been But the proposed pluvial flooding, which we saw in Lagoon Hull project aims to change Cost of Lagoon 2007, where a massive downpour one or two types of flooding, but Hull is Hall that. into saturated land led to surface vulnerable to all of them. It is a perfect The £1.5bn scheme will involve the water runoff just pooling everywhere storm of all the risk factors.” construction of an 11km causeway in throughout the city before it even got Lagoon Hull aims to deliver a holistic the Humber estuary, creating a non- 11km to the drains.
    [Show full text]
  • Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge Overview to Natural England’S Compendium of Statutory Reports to the Secretary of State for This Stretch of Coast
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge Overview to Natural England’s compendium of statutory reports to the Secretary of State for this stretch of coast 1 England Coast Path | Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge | Overview Map A: Key Map – Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge Stretch 2 England Coast Path | Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge | Overview Report number and title MHB 1: Mablethorpe North End to Saltfleet Haven (Maps MHB 1a to MHB 1e) MHB 2: Saltfleet Haven to Humberston (Maps MHB 2a to MHB 2l) MHB 3: Humberston to Immingham Docks (Maps MHB 3a to MHB 3n) MHB 4: Immingham Docks to Humber Bridge (Maps MHB 4a to MHB 4o) Using Key Map Map A (opposite) shows the whole of the Mablethorpe to Humber Bridge stretch divided into shorter numbered lengths of coast. Each number on Map A corresponds to the report which relates to that length of coast. To find our proposals for a particular place, find the place on Map A and note the number of the report which includes it. If you are interested in an area which crosses the boundary between two reports, please read the relevant parts of both reports. Printing If printing, please note that the maps which accompany reports 1 to 4 should ideally be printed on A3 paper. If you don’t have the facility to print at A3 size, we suggest you print the text of the report you are interested in on A4 paper and view the associated map on your computer screen, using the zoom tool to view it at a suitable size.
    [Show full text]
  • Ockleston Bailey
    UNIT 2, 58-62 JAMESON STREET, HULL HU1 3LS ockleston bailey PRIME FREEHOLD RETAIL INVESTMENT retail leisure investment LET TO ANN SUMMERS LIMITED Location Hull is located in the North East on the northern banks of the Humber Estuary. The City is located 60 miles (96km) east of Leeds, 40 miles (64 km) southeast of York, 45 miles (72km) east of Doncaster, 66 miles (106km) east of Sheffield and187 Investment Summary miles (301 km) north of London. n Prime trading location on the pedestrianised Jameson Street. Hull benefits from excellent road communications being strategically located on the A63 which provides direct access to the M62 motorway which in turns runs n In close proximity to the £130 million Albion Square west to Manchester and connects with the M1 motorway. The M180 is situated redevelopment of the former BHS/Co-op and Edwin Davis 15 miles (24km) south and is accessed via both the A63 and A15. Buildings (King Edward, Jameson and Waltham Streets) to The City benefits from an excellent rail service with regular services from Hull create 182,000 sq ft of retail space, with 279 residential units, Paragon Interchange running to London Kings Cross with a fastest journey time of more than 600 car parking spaces and a new Ice Arena. approximately 2hrs 45mins. In addition there are regular services to Leeds, York and Manchester and onwards to the rest of the UK. n The property is let to Ann Summers Limited (Company No.01034349) by way of a 10 year FR&I lease from 29 October Humberside Airport is located within a 30 minute drive time south of Hull and 2018, subject to an upward only rent review in 5th year, at a serves in excess of 500,000 passengers a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Land AVAILABLE Hull, HU3 4SA
    Development Land AVAILABLE Hull, HU3 4SA On the instructions of administrators Development Land St Andrews Quay, 30 acres (12.1HA) Hull, HU3 4SA an established COMMERCIAL location with frontage The site frontS the primary vehicular to the A63 which is the primary arterial route route into and out of Hull. connecting the motorway network to the west, Hull City Centre to the east and the cities docks. Location Planning The site is unallocated by the local planning authority hull The City of Kingston-Upon-Hull has a population of but there is a policy under it’s “white land” status to east park around 250,000 with a further 150,000 in the immediate proactively work with the land owner/developer to surrounding suburbs. It is a major industrial city with determine the best use for the site. Interested parties pearson park garden village extensive river port facilities. The area is home to should make enquiries with the sole agent who will the avenues a number of major businesses including Arco, BAE facilitate guidance and information from the local holderness rd Systems, Reckitt Benckiser, Siemens, Smith & Nephew, planning authority. Employment uses or residential a1079 southcoates BP, Guardian Industries and Wren Kitchens. spring bank w development maybe considered. botanic a165 west park hedon rd Description Demographics a63 anlaby rd hull station This brown field site forms part of the former old town VICTORIA DOCK Hull is ranked as one of the best locations for anlaby park St Andrews Dock and has an attractive waterfront onto businesses in the UK. Employment is the highest on the Humber Estuary to the south, and is prominently a63 record with local wages growing faster than the national positioned along the primary route into the city along gipsyville average.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Plan for the Humber
    Transport Plan for the Humber CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 1 Local context .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Policy context ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 HUMBER TRANSPORT NETWORKS AND ASSETS 4 Ports .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Airports .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Road and Rail .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 CHANGING GOVERNANCE LANDSCAPE 8 Transport for the North ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Devolution of powers to local areas ................................................................................................................. 9 4 RECENT SUCCESS AND DELIVERY 10 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Local Growth Fund Schemes ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tolkien and the Zeppelins
    Journal of Tolkien Research Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 1 2020 Tolkien and the Zeppelins Seamus Hamill-Keays none, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Hamill-Keays, Seamus (2020) "Tolkien and the Zeppelins," Journal of Tolkien Research: Vol. 11 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch/vol11/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Christopher Center Library at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Tolkien Research by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Tolkien and the Zeppelins Cover Page Footnote I am immensely grateful to those who have helped in the preparation of this article: Dr Nancy Bunting for her encouragement to write it, Ruth Lacon for her extensive knowledge of RNAS airships, Ian Castle for permission to include an extract from his website, Helen Clark of East Riding Archives, Dr Rebecca Harding of the Imperial War Museum Duxford, Willis Ainley for the photograph of Roos Post Office and the many others whose diligent research listed in the references provided me with details that support this article. This article is available in Journal of Tolkien Research: https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch/vol11/iss1/ 1 Hamill-Keays: Tolkien and the Zeppelins TOLKIEN AND THE ZEPPELINS Seamus Hamill-Keays Squadron Leader, Royal Air Force (Retired) 1.Introduction The tumults in the killing fields of the Great War died away over one hundred years ago, yet the Western Front still echoes in memories in Britain and Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • C DPM Records of Hull Magistrates Court C.1836-1995
    Hull History Centre: Records of Hull Magistrates Court C DPM Records of Hull Magistrates Court c.1836-1995 Historical background: Magistrates courts are the lowest level of courts in Enlgand, and is where alomst all criminal proceedings start. Hull was first granted the right to appoint its own magistrates, also known as Justices of the Peace (JPs), to deal with the summary cases, in 1440. More serious offences or indictable crimes would be passed to the quarter sessions or to the county assize, for capital cases. Despite the abolition of the old municipal corporation in 1836, the reformed borough was still able to select its own magistrates and hold its own courts, sometimes also known as police courts or petty sessions. This system continued until the reforms of the 1971 Courts Act, where the magistrate’s courts remained at lowest level, with the quarter sessions replaced by crown courts. The magistrate’s courts could also hear some civil cases, when county courts were established under the County Court Act 1846. They had jurisdiction over the recovery of debts and civil actions up to certain financial limits, including bankruptcy. Custodial History: The first group of records transferred to the City Archives were selected by the Clerk to the Magistrates at the Hull and Holderness Magistrates Courts in 1986, with another series of licensing records, C DPM/24 and C DPM/43-44, transferred in September 1993. C DPM/47 was transferred in January 2008 from the Hull County Court. C DPM/5/10- 12, C DPM/7/37-39, C DPM/24/2-5 and C DPM/48-49 were transferred in December 2016 from the Hull and Holderness Courts.
    [Show full text]