Highways Agency Project Support Framework A63 Castle Street Improvements, Hull
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Highways Agency Project Support Framework A63 Castle Street Improvements, Hull Scheme Assessment Report (Options Selection Stage) Document Reference: W11189/T11/05 Final Rev 6 FEBRUARY 2010 HIGHWAYS AGENCY PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (OPTIONS SELECTION STAGE) FEBRUARY 2010 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS – HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (OPTIONS SELECTION STAGE) FEBRUARY 2010 Revision Record Revision Ref Date Originator Checked Approved Status 1 14/12/09 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 2 08/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 3 13/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Draft 4 25/01/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final 5 17/02/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final 6 26/02/10 C Riley N Rawcliffe N Rawcliffe Final This report is to be regarded as confidential to our Client and it is intended for their use only and may not be assigned. Consequently and in accordance with current practice, any liability to any third party in respect of the whole or any part of its contents is hereby expressly excluded. Before the report or any part of it is reproduced or referred to in any document, circular or statement and before its contents or the contents of any part of it are disclosed orally to any third party, our written approval as to the form and context of such a publication or disclosure must be obtained. Prepared for: Prepared by: Highways Agency Pell Frischmann Consultants Ltd Major Projects National George House Lateral George Street 8 City Walk Wakefield Leeds WF1 1LY LS11 9AT Tel: 01924 368 145 Fax: 01924 376 643 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1. BRIEF ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. EXISTING PROBLEMS ................................................................................ 2 1.3. SCHEME DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT HISTORY ........................ 2 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 6 2.1. DESCRIPTION OF LOCALITY ..................................................................... 6 2.2. EXISTING HIGHWAY NETWORK ................................................................ 6 2.3. TRAFFIC FORECASTS ................................................................................ 9 2.4. ACCIDENTS AND JOURNEY TIME RELIABILITY ......................................10 2.5. LAND USE ..................................................................................................12 2.6. DRAINAGE ..................................................................................................13 2.7. GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................14 2.8. PUBLIC UTILITIES ......................................................................................14 2.9. ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................................................15 3. PLANNING FACTORS .........................................................................................47 3.1. OPTION CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................47 3.2. SCHEME OPTIONS CONSIDERED ............................................................47 3.3. PREFERRED OPTIONS .............................................................................48 3.4. NON-PREFERRED OPTIONS ....................................................................51 4. CONSEQUENCES OF THE “DO-NOTHING” SCENARIO ....................................55 4.1. REQUIREMENT FOR THE SCHEME .........................................................55 4.2. IMPORTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL GATEWAYS – PORT OF HULL .......56 4.3. LOCAL POLICIES .......................................................................................57 4.4. ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT ...................................................................58 4.5. SUMMARY OF CONSEQUENCES .............................................................60 5. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE SCHEMES .........................................................61 5.1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................61 5.2. UNDERGROUND OPTION - PREFERRED ................................................61 5.3. OVERGROUND OPTION - PREFERRED ...................................................64 5.4. UNDERGROUND LANDBRIDGE - NON PREFERRED ..............................66 5.5. UNDERGROUND CUT AND COVER TUNNEL - NON PREFERRED .........70 5.6. OVERGROUND LANDBRIDGE - NON PREFERRED .................................73 5.7. OVERGROUND EXTENDED VIADUCT - NON PREFERRED ....................76 6. ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC, ECONOMICS AND COSTS ..................................80 6.1. TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT ............................................................................80 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) 6.2. ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT........................................................................81 7. HIGHWAYS DESIGN DATA .................................................................................90 7.1. ROAD LAYOUT AND STANDARDS - DESIGN ELEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS ..........................................................................................90 8. ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN DATA ......................................................................92 8.1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................92 8.2. AIR QUALITY ..............................................................................................92 8.3. CULTURAL HERITAGE ..............................................................................96 8.4. TOWNSCAPE ........................................................................................... 104 8.5. NATURE CONSERVATION ...................................................................... 120 8.6. MATERIALS .............................................................................................. 129 8.7. NOISE ....................................................................................................... 130 8.8. EFFECT ON ALL TRAVELLERS ............................................................... 131 8.9. COMMUNITY AND PRIVATE ASSETS ..................................................... 132 8.10. ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ........................... 135 9. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION ......................................................... 137 9.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 137 9.2. CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................ 137 9.3. CONSULTATION MATERIAL .................................................................... 137 9.4. EXHIBITION PUBLICITY ........................................................................... 139 9.5. RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...................................... 140 9.6. SUMMARY OF QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES ..................................... 141 9.7. CORRESPONDENCE FROM INDIVIDUALS ............................................ 145 9.8. PUBLIC EXHIBITION COMMENTS ........................................................... 146 9.9. SUMMARY OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS‟ RESPONSES ............................. 147 9.10. ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED ................................................................... 150 9.11. CONCLUSIONS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ................................ 151 9.12. POST PUBLIC CONSULTATION OPTION ................................................ 153 10. CONSULTATION (IN CONFIDENCE) ................................................................ 154 10.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 154 10.2. VALUE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP ...................................................... 154 10.3. AIR QUALITY CONSULTATION ............................................................... 155 10.4. CULTURAL HERITAGE ............................................................................ 155 10.5. ECOLOGY ................................................................................................. 158 10.6. LANDSCAPE/TOWNSCAPE ..................................................................... 159 10.7. WATER ..................................................................................................... 159 10.8. NETWORK OPERATIONS DIVISION ....................................................... 160 PROJECT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK A63 CASTLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - HULL SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (W11189/T11/05) 11. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 162 11.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 162 11.2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT .......... 162 11.3. COMPARISON OF OPTIONS ................................................................... 163 11.4. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS .......................................................................... 168 12. RECOMMENDED