DOCSLIB.ORG

D.3.2.5 Final Report on Physical and Non-Physical Bottlenecks and Missing Links in Italy and Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D.3.2.5 Final Report on Physical and Non-Physical Bottlenecks and Missing Links in Italy and Croatia D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/CHARGE Document Control Sheet Project number: 10041221 Project acronym CHARGE Capitalization and Harmonization of the Adriatic Region Gate of Project Title Europe Start of the project January 2018 Duration 21 months 3.2 – Identification of main physical and nonphysical bottlenecks Related activity: in the Adriatic area Deliverable name: Final report Type of deliverable Report Language English Elimination or Reduction of Bottlenecks through the Work Package Title Harmonization of Data Work Package number 3 Work Package Leader KIP – Intermodal Transport Cluster Status Final Author (s) KIP Version 1 Due date of deliverable 09/2019 Delivery date 09/2019 ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 2 Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 7 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND SCOPE OF STUDY ...................................................... 8 BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ............................................................................. 12 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS IN THE SCOPE OF CHARGE PROJECT .................................................. 14 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 16 Annexes .................................................................................................................................... 17 Port of Rijeka ........................................................................................................................ 17 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ............. 17 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ........................................... 23 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ..................... 27 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS .................................................................................................. 28 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 30 Port of Ploče ......................................................................................................................... 32 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ............. 32 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ........................................... 41 ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 3 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ..................... 44 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS .................................................................................................. 45 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 46 Port of Split ........................................................................................................................... 48 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ............. 48 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ........................................... 55 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ..................... 59 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS .................................................................................................. 60 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 61 Port of Venice ....................................................................................................................... 63 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ............. 63 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ........................................... 63 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ..................... 64 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS .................................................................................................. 65 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 66 Port of Ortona ...................................................................................................................... 67 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ............. 67 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ........................................... 81 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ..................... 86 ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 4 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS .................................................................................................. 89 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 91 ANNEX 1 – Questionnaires ............................................................................................... 93 ANNEX 2 - Programming documents of the Port of Ortona ............................................ 96 Port of Bari ......................................................................................................................... 102 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND CHARACTERIZING RESPECTIVE AREA ........... 102 LISTING OF ALL BOTTLENECKS AND UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS ......................................... 109 ANALYSING OF LISTED BOTTLENECKS AND THEIR CAUSATIVE RELATIONS ................... 111 PROPOSING SOLUTIONS OF BOTTLENECKS AND ANALYSING HOW IT WILL AFFECT FUTURE FREIGHT FLOWS ................................................................................................ 114 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 116 ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 5 INTRODUCTION This document is part of WP3 Elimination or reduction of Bottlenecks through the Harmonization of Data. The main objective of this work package is the identification of new physical bottlenecks in the Adriatic area as an improvement and a pursuance of the CARICA activity, updating of CARICA reports on bottlenecks and traffic flows. After collecting inputs from partners on issues on bottleneck collection and analysis, this document will give a brief overview of all collected bottlenecks and main problems in analysed ports, as well as show similarities and differences in Croatian and Italian bottlenecks. ABSTRACT The final report is a document which offers a brief overview of the listing, analysis and proposed solutions of all the collected bottlenecks from the three Italian (Venice, Bari and Ancona) and three Croatian ports (Rijeka, Ploče and Split). Along with serving as an overview of the Analyses of physical and non-physical bottlenecks in Italy and Croatia, this document displays similarities and differnces between Croatian and Italian bottlenecks and therefore different approaches on solving them. ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The final report is a brief overview of the Analyses of physical and non-physical bottlenecks in Italy and Croatia. As such it defines the areas of study of three Italian ports – Venice, Bari and Ancona; and three Croatian ports – Rijeka, Ploče and Split. Italian and Croatian ports analysed in this document have several problems. Croatian ports have mainly same bottlenecks that are infrastructural in nature, Italian ports have issues mostly with the limited depth in the part of their port basins which leads to the problems with large ships that wants to enter their ports. Many problems and bottlenecks were resolved through EU funded projects such as Interreg, CEF and similar programmes. Apart from EU funded projects, partners also resolve bottlenecks through infrastructure and development projects funded from national or own sources. ___________________________________________________________________________ D.3.2.5 Final report on physical and non-physical bottlenecks and missing links in Italy and Croatia 7 DEFINING THE AREA UNDER STUDY AND SCOPE OF STUDY The main goal of the project is analysis of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS of REGIONAL ANESTHESIA to PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Micha
    A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA TO PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Michael H. Andreae , M.D.1, Matthew Johnson2, Henry Sacks3 1Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, 2Teachers College, Columbia University, 3Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Introduction: Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for autologous bone grafting. IBCG harvesting can lead to persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), devastating and difficult to treat (Brull 1992). Local anesthetics administration may reduce this risk (Singh 2007). PPSP trials typically report heterogeneous outcomes, making classical frequentist meta-analysis in our Cochrane review in print (Andreae 2012) challenging. To overcome this limitation, we developed a Bayesian model on regional anesthesia for the prevention of persistent pain after IBCG harvesting. We pooled dichotomous and continuous pain outcomes at varying follow up intervals. Methods: Methods were detailed in our systematic review for the Cochrane Collaboration in print (Andreae 2012). Search: Briefly, we searched the Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL (1966 to April 2012) without any language restriction using a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary. We searched conference abstracts by hand. Selection: We included randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials with pain outcomes at least 12 weeks postoperatively. Included studies compared local or regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for chronic pain after ICBG harvest. Data extraction: We assessed trial quality and extracted pain outcome, including information on adverse events. Bayesian model: We developed a longitudinal Bayesian model in OpenBUGS with three time points to estimate the posterior distribution of the odds ratio of chronic pain six months after surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans. Marit. Sci. Vol. 1, No. 1
    doi: 10.7225/toms.v01. n01.002 12-16 REGULAR PAPERS Hrvoje Baričević, Matija Glad Valuation of Road Infrastructure in Urban and Traffic Study of the City of Split Hrvoje Baričević1, Matija Glad2 Valuation of Road Infrastructure in Urban and Traffic Study of the City of Split Functional reciprocity of all transport sectors with their 1. INTRODUCTION infrastructure support is most evident in ports. The port of Split, integrated in Split’s traffic intersection, is a striking example of Reciprocity operation of all transport sectors with their uniqueness of Split-Dalmatia County as a traffic and economic infrastructure support is most evident in ports. The port of Split centre of Central Dalmatia. The development of City’s harbour integrated in Split’s traffic intersection is a striking example of for passenger traffic and the North Port for cargo traffic has uniqueness of Split-Dalmatia County, as a traffic and economic determined already set constellation of relations of maritime, centre of Central Dalmatia. At this relatively confined and high road and rail traffic, and their mutual interference. The road quality space overlap agglomeration of Split, Solin and Kaštela, transport and activities with regard to hinterland services and the related port systems. As a very important future generate economic development in which Split is no exception. longitudinal segment of The Adriatic-Ionian Corridor, Split has This estimate is based on changes that can be expected in the role of transit, as well as the starting point of landing in the terms of redistribution of traffic flow in the central and southern circulation of all types of transport substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia! Is 10% Higher
    The highway toll Toll is calculated based on actual kilometres travelled on tolled segments and the relevant vehicle category. Toll is paid at the toll collection points and may be paid in cash and by American Express, Diners, Master Card, and Visa, Maestro or using the ETC device (electronic toll collection). Non-residents may pay toll in €. Welcome Seasonal toll prices for I.A, I and II vehicle category apply from 16th June to 14th September. In the season, the unit price of tolls to Croatia! is 10% higher. Comparison of non- seasonal and seasonal toll prices for I and II category of vehicles on most frequently used motorway sections I group II group Motorway section Non-seasonal Seasonal Non-seasonal Seasonal prices (HRK) prices (HRK) prices (HRK) prices (HRK) A1 Zagreb-Dugopolje 181 200 284 312 (Split) A1-A6 Zagreb-Rijeka 70 77 127 139 (Grobnik) A4 Zagreb-Goričan 44 47 65 72 The complete list of toll prices can be found on the following link. A3 Zagreb-Lipovac 128 141 193 212 http://hac.hr/en/toll-rates/pricelist?language=en Bregana 7 7 9 10 More about ETC service is available at the next link. Krčki most 35 39 46 51 http://hac.hr/en/toll-rates/electronic-toll-collection-etc?language=en *1 EUR= approx. 7.4 HRK Inquiries and complaints on toll prices can be forwarded by e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] Vehicle category The Croatian Motorways wishes you a safe journey! What is the ETC service? ETC – electronic toll collection service enables all highway users toll payment on all toll collection points in a faster and simpler way.
    [Show full text]
  • RAVČA Autoceste A1 ZAGREB
    HAC brosura 3 str. HAC brosura 4 str. HAC brosura 5 str. HAC brosura 6 str. DIONICE // ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA A1 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK > > SEKTOR : DUGOPOLJE - PLOČE // DIONICE: ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA 10. 426 m 29. 471 m ČVOR A10 AUTOCESTA GRANICA BIH - PLOČE > > > > > > > > > Spojna cesta ČVOR PLOČE - LUKA PLOČE DIONICA: ČCP KARAMATIĆI - ČVOR ČEVELJUŠA > > > > > > > > > OBJEKTI U TRASI AUTOCESTE < ZAGREB D1 Objekti u trasi izvedeni su u punom Vijadukt Mladine L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 249 m Vijadukt Glavica L = 309 m Vijadukt Staje L = 238 m Vijadukt Rašćane L = 633 m Vijadukt Dubrava L = 271 m D511 ŠESTANOVAC PUO ZAGVOZD ZAGVOZD PUO RAŠĆANE GORNJE PUO BIOKOVO RAVČA profilu autoceste, a najznačajniji objekti D220 su: Trilj A1 D62 Vijadukt Mladine, duljine 158 m, ima dva Centar za održavanje vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki D58 DUGOPOLJE < ZAGREB i kontrolu prometa DUBROVNIK > smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Kaštel Kaštel A1 Kaštel Stari Lukšić D60 ČVOR ŠESTANOVAC iznosi 130 km/h. Kambelovac Klis AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK Kaštel Novi Kaštel Sućurac Odmorište Zagvozd Odmorište Rašćane Gornje Odmorište Biokovo Solin Bisko Cista Velika Vijadukt Gradina, duljine 158 m, ima dva A1 D39 ODMORIŠTE ZAGVOZD vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki Kaštel Kaštel Seget Donji D8 Gomolica u planu smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Dionice > ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD i ZAGVOZD - RAVČA Štafilić Žrnovnica Trogir VIJADUKT MLADINE u planu u planu iznosi 130 km/h. 10. 426 Prijelaz
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Logistics in Croatia Flanders Investment & Trade Market Survey
    TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA September 2016 Yazmin Valleyo Sarmiento, Ivan Vandija, Marija Grsetic Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 CROATIA OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Economic Environment Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Croatian Economic Environment SWOT Analysis ......................................................................................................... 12 Croatia SWOT ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 CROATIAN TRANSPORT SECTOR ....................................................................................................................................................14 Introduction to the Transport Sector in Croatia .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DYC Croatia Base Info 2014.06
    Marina Zaton 43°46'39.66"N 15°49'48.22"E MARINA ZATON is located in the very well protected southwestern end of Zaton bay, opposite to the entrance to lake Prokljan and in the spectacular river Krka canal /delta, on the main maritime route to Skradin and national park Krka. The natural bay of the marina offers great protection from all winds, waves and boat rocking while the beautiful natural setting surrounding the marina creates a relaxing atmosphere and a sense of privacy. The total area of the marina is 3673 m2, of which 3192 m2 is water surface. The marina has a total of 35 berths, fully equipped with sufficient shore power (16A and 32A) and water connections. Operating the marina privately and exclusively for DYC customers enables us to bring our service to an even higher level. For our clients, we have secured spacious sanitary facilities, sufficient parking, reception, and WIFI throughout the marina. In the picturesque village of Zaton, located 500 m from the marina, there are all necessary services – major supermarket, post office, ambulance, shops, church and other places of interest. Transfer to and from Zaton is secured at a fixed rate for our customers. Base details General manager and base manager: Kresimir Klaric, Cell: +385 91 274 5145 Customer service: Tonko Palinic, Cell +385 99 210 9327 Technical manager: Slavko Milutin, Cell: +385 98 761 240 Office staff & booking: Marina Brajkovi Cell: +385 99 3174 831 Base office: Tel/Fax: +385 22 310 103 E-mail: [email protected] Embarkation: Marina Zaton, Sibenik Dream Yacht Charter Croatia Marina Zaton 22215 ZATON BY SIBENIK - CROATIA How to reach us By plane Airport SPLIT 70 km (50 min) from the base – cost for 1-8 pax EUR 240 round trip Airport ZADAR ZADAR 80 km (60 min) from the base – 1-8 pax EUR 240 round trip Clients arriving by plane are advised to contact our booking department and arrange for the transfer in advance and receive best service and guaranteed rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Korice OPCA BROSURA 4 J.Fh 11
    C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Split - Dalmatia County Tourist Board Prilaz braæe Kaliterna 10/1 21 000 Split, Croatia, p.b. 430 tel/fax: +385 (0)21 490 032; 490 033; 490 036 [email protected] www.dalmatia.hr Publisher: Split - Dalmatia County Tourist Board For the Publisher: dr.sc. Mili Razoviæ Conception: doc. dr. sc. Fedja Vukiæ, prof. dr. sc. Marcel Meler Editorial Office: prof. dr. sc. Ivo Babiæ, dr.sc. Mili Razoviæ Text: Ružica Mikaèiæ Photos: Andrija Carli, Ivo Pervan, Branko Ostojiæ, Mario Romuliæ, Zlatko Sunko, Krešimir Žanetiæ Translation: SPES d.o.o. Proofreading: Michael Gable Graphic Design and Prepress: Norma International d.o.o., Zagreb Print: Tipomat d.o.o. Praha 7h 30 Bratislava 4h 30 Mursko Sredi¹æe Dubrava Praha 8h 30 Kri¾ovljanska Èakovec Wien 4h Trnovec Gorièan Graz 2h 30 Gorièan Macelj Èakovec Vara¾din Bratislava 4h 30 Lupinjak Ludbreg Budapest 3h Vara¾din Vara¾dinske Toplice Gola Krapina Novi Marof Krapina Breznièki Hum Koprivnica Razvor Krakow 10h Sv. Kri¾ Zaèretje Ðurðevac Bratislava 4h 30 Komin Kri¾evci Budapest 3h 30 Budapest 3h München 6h Zabok Krakow 10h 30 Dubo¹evica Salzburg 4h 30 Medvednica Sveta Helena Terezino polje Budapest 3h 30 Ljubljana 1h 30 Donji Zapre¹iæZagreb Bjelovar Baranjsko Batina Bregana Popovec Miholjac Samobor Vrbovec Virovitica Petrovo Selo Sveta Nedelja Ivanja Reka Beli Manastir ®umberak - Jankomir Ivaniæ grad Donji Miholjac München 6h Samoborsko gorje Slatina Kopaèki rit Milano 5h 30 Milano 5h 30 Salzburg 4h 30 Jastrebarsko Prezid Luèko Velika Gorica Ljubljana 1h 30 Buzin Grubi¹no Polje Venezia 3 h Venezia 3 h Jurovski Brod D I N A R A Trieste 30min Trieste 30min Erdut Rupa A1 Vrlika Peruèko j.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Corridor Vc Motorway Completion
    PUBLIC DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Approved by the Board on 6 May 20201 CROATIA CORRIDOR VC MOTORWAY COMPLETION [Redacted in line with the EBRD’s Access to Information Policy] [Information considered confidential has been removed from this document in accordance with the EBRD’s Access to Information Policy (AIP). Such removed information is considered confidential because it falls under one of the provisions of Section III, paragraph 2 of the AIP] 1 As per section 1.4.8 of EBRD’s Directive on Access to Information (2019), the Bank shall disclose Board reports for State Sector Projects within 30 calendar days of approval of the relevant Project by the Board of Directors. Confidential information has been removed from the Board report. 1 PUBLIC PUBLIC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... 2 ABBREVIATIONS / CURRENCY CONVERSIONS ............................................. 3 PRESIDENT'S RECOMMENDATION ................................................................... 4 BOARD DECISION SHEET ..................................................................................... 5 ADDITIONAL SUMMARY TERMS FACTSHEET .............................................. 6 1. STRATEGIC FIT AND KEY ISSUES ............................................................ 8 1.1 STRATEGIC CONTEXT................................................................................ 8 1.2 TRANSITION IMPACT ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A1 TV Raspored Digitalnih Programa - Zadar I Šibenik
    A1 TV Raspored digitalnih programa - Zadar i Šibenik OSNOVNI PAKET PROŠIRENI PAKET PROŠIRENI PAKET (nastavak) 0 Info kanal 32 CineStar TV Premiere 1 HD 509 DMC 1 HRT1 33 CineStar TV Premiere 2 HD 510 RTV Banovina 2 HRT2 49 FC World HD 600 Al Jazeera Balkans 3 RTL 54 Doku TV HD 601 CNN 4 Nova TV 108 AXN 608 Deutsche Welle 5 RTL2 113 FOX Crime 650 VOX 6 Doma TV 114 CineStar TV Premiere 1 652 RAI Due 7 HRT3 115 CineStar TV Premiere 2 660 RAI Tre 8 HRT4 116 Kino TV 655 Pro7 9 RTL Kockica 117 Klasik TV 657 Mediaset Italia 10 Mini TV 118 RTL Crime 658 TV5MONDE 11 N1 119 RTL Passion 659 arte 100 CineStar TV 122 Sci Fi 701 Z1 101 CineStar TV Action & Thriller 208 SK2 704 TV Jadran 102 DIVA 210 SK4 708 TV Istra 103 FOX 211 SK5 709 TV Nova Pula 104 FOX Life 212 SK6 713 SBTV 105 Viasat TV 1000 213 HNTV 714 DUTV 106 Comedy Central Extra 214 Kreator TV 716 FullTV 107 AMC 215 Fight Channel 717 VTV Varaždin 205 eSportsTV 216 FC World 718 Srce TV 206 Sportska TV 217 Ginx 720 Trend TV 207 SK1 305 NatGeo Wild 721 Poljoprivredna TV 209 SK3 306 DocuBox 722 Saborska TV 260 Fight Channel PPV 307 Planet Earth 723 Zdrava TV-7 300 National Geographic 308 Viasat Nature 724 Libertas TV 301 Doku TV 309 History 753 RTS Svet 302 Viasat History 352 CBS Reality 756 OBN 303 Viasat Explore 353 Laudato TV 760 RTCG 304 Epic Drama 354 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Road-Based Public Transport Action Plan
    ROAD-BASED PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN Version 3 Road- Based Public Transport Action Plan 04 2018 Page 1 1. Project background and programme context The project entitled Landside Airports Accessibility - LAirA1 includes a project consortium of 10 project partners, and 4 associate partners. These partners are: Municipality of the 18th District of Budapest, Budapest Airport, SEA Milan Airports, Regional Government of the Mazowieckie Voivodeship, Stuttgart Region Economic Development Corporation, Dubrovnik Airport, Dubrovnik Development Agency, Airport Regions Conference, AustriaTech Ltd. – Federal Agency for Technological Measures, City of Poznan, Stuttgart Region, Vienna Airport, BKK Centre for Budapest Transport (BKK), Warsaw/Modlin Airport. Therefore, Dubrovnik Airport is one of the members of the consortium and partners in the project. The project CRE1074 LAirA is financed from European Union (EU) funds, within the Central Europe transnational cooperation programme (INTERREG Central Europe). 1.1. Project objectives The transport activities of airports and their broader surroundings produce both positive and negative aspects. Negative aspects, such as environmental impacts, largely concern the emissions of greenhouse gases (above all CO2) emitted by the vehicles used at airports, and for the transport of employees, passengers and others, from their home to the airport and vice versa. The objective of this Project is to reduce energy consumption, particularly fossil fuels, and the harmful environmental aspects resulting from transport activities, both at airports themselves, and in their broader environment, ensuing from the mobility of employees, passengers and visitors(those who go in and wait for the passengers) arriving at the airport, and those departing from the airport to the surrounding cities and settlements.
    [Show full text]