DOCSLIB.ORG

RAVČA Autoceste A1 ZAGREB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HAC brosura 3 str. HAC brosura 4 str. HAC brosura 5 str. HAC brosura 6 str. DIONICE // ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA A1 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK > > SEKTOR : DUGOPOLJE - PLOČE // DIONICE: ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD - RAVČA 10. 426 m 29. 471 m ČVOR A10 AUTOCESTA GRANICA BIH - PLOČE > > > > > > > > > Spojna cesta ČVOR PLOČE - LUKA PLOČE DIONICA: ČCP KARAMATIĆI - ČVOR ČEVELJUŠA > > > > > > > > > OBJEKTI U TRASI AUTOCESTE < ZAGREB D1 Objekti u trasi izvedeni su u punom Vijadukt Mladine L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 158 m Vijadukt Gradina L = 249 m Vijadukt Glavica L = 309 m Vijadukt Staje L = 238 m Vijadukt Rašćane L = 633 m Vijadukt Dubrava L = 271 m D511 ŠESTANOVAC PUO ZAGVOZD ZAGVOZD PUO RAŠĆANE GORNJE PUO BIOKOVO RAVČA profilu autoceste, a najznačajniji objekti D220 su: Trilj A1 D62 Vijadukt Mladine, duljine 158 m, ima dva Centar za održavanje vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki D58 DUGOPOLJE < ZAGREB i kontrolu prometa DUBROVNIK > smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Kaštel Kaštel A1 Kaštel Stari Lukšić D60 ČVOR ŠESTANOVAC iznosi 130 km/h. Kambelovac Klis AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SPLIT - DUBROVNIK Kaštel Novi Kaštel Sućurac Odmorište Zagvozd Odmorište Rašćane Gornje Odmorište Biokovo Solin Bisko Cista Velika Vijadukt Gradina, duljine 158 m, ima dva A1 D39 ODMORIŠTE ZAGVOZD vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za svaki Kaštel Kaštel Seget Donji D8 Gomolica u planu smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje Dionice > ŠESTANOVAC - ZAGVOZD i ZAGVOZD - RAVČA Štafilić Žrnovnica Trogir VIJADUKT MLADINE u planu u planu iznosi 130 km/h. 10. 426 Prijelaz za životinje, duljine 156 m, i Lovreč VIJADUKT GRADINA Stobreč > > > ČVORIŠTA nadsvođuje puni profil autoceste. Autocesta Zagreb – Split – Dubrovnik dio je mreže Elementi poprečnog profila: međunarodnih E cesta, te osim domaće oznake A1, dobiva i SPLIT Podstrana ČVOR ZAGVOZD kombinirane oznake E-65 i E-71, jer nastavlja prometne tokove D62 D60 Povezivanje dionica autoceste od Šestanovca do Ravče na postojeću Vijadukt RAŠĆANE, jedan od najvažnijih objekata na dionici Zagvozd razdjelni pojas 3,00 m Sjeverne i Srednje Europe iz smjera Beča (E-59), Bratislave D8 Imotski cestovnu mrežu ostvaruje se preko čvorišta Zagvozd 1, Zagvozd 2 i - Ravča je vijadukt "Rašćane", gredni most sandučastog poprečnog (E-65) i Budimpešte (E-71). Blato na Cetini VIJADUKT GRADINA Ravča. Čvor Zagvozd 1 i Ravča na autocesti su projektirani u obliku presjeka, ukupne duljine 633 m s 19 raspona, a njegova ukupna vozni trak 3,75 m trube, a čvor Zagvozd 2 na državnoj cesti u obliku poludjeteline. širina iznosi gotovo 28 metara. Sastoji se od dva paralelna mosta od Dugi Rat Donji Vinjani Tlocrtni elementi krakova čvora Zagvozd 1 i Ravča projektirani su za kojih svaki nosi jedan prometni trak s dva vozna i jednim zaustavnim Autocesta Zagreb – Split – Dubrovnik osnovna je infrastruk- VIJADUKT GLAVICA preticajni trak 3,75 m računsku brzinu od 40 do 60 km/h, a tlocrtni elementi krakova čvora trakom, a građen je tehnologijom postupnog potiskivanja, koja turna poveznica sjevernog i južnog teritorija Republike Omiš Šestanovac Zmijavci km Zagvozd 2 za Vr = 40 km/h. osigurava visoku kvalitetu konstrukcije i tek malo zadiranje u Hrvatske, dakle, od nacionalnog je interesa, strateška ŠOLTA zaustavni trak 2,50 m VIJADUKT STAJE prirodni okoliš. Dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 130 km/h. pretpostavka za razvoj gospodarstva, oživljavanja privrede, D39 Čvor Zagvozd 1 omogućava prometnu vezu šireg zagvozdskog naročito turizma te prihvata i provođenja tranzitnog prometa. Supetar Zagvozd rubni trakovi 0,5 + 0,2 m D111 Brela ODMORIŠTE RAŠĆANE GOR. 29. 471 područja s autocestom preko cestovnog čvora Zagvozd 2 (veza na Vijadukt Gradina, duljine 249 m, ima dva vozna i jedan zaustavni trak Runović D62). za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 130 km/h. bankine 1,75 m Trasa autoceste od Šestanovca do Zagvozda proteže se VIJADUKT RAŠĆANE Čvor Zagvozd 2 u prvoj fazi omogućava spoj državne ceste D62 na Vijadukt Glavica, duljine 309 m, ima dva vozna i jedan zaustavni trak brežuljkasto–ravničarskim terenom, a omogućava prometnu Baška Voda berme 1,75 m autocestu Zagreb – Split - Dubrovnik. Izgradnjom buduće državne za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 130 km/h. vezu autoceste sa širim zagvozdskim područjem. D114 ODMORIŠTE BIOKOVO ceste Imotski – Zagvozd – tunel "Sveti Ilija-Biokovo" – Jadranska Dionica Zagvozd – Ravča veže se na prethodnu dionicu, a Pučišća D8 magistrala D8 (Baška Voda), omogućit će se najbrža prometna veza Vijadukt Staje, duljine 238 m, ima dva vozna i jedan zaustavni trak za prolazi pretežito brdsko-planinskim terenom. Položena je VIJADUKT DUBRAVA sjever - jug, od Imotskog do autoceste i nastavno tunelom do mora, svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 130 km/h. rubnim područjem parka prirode “Biokovo“, dok se s južne Na dionici od Šestanovca do Ravče izgrađeno je 47 objekata: gdje će čvor Zagvozd 2 preuzeti ulogu deniveliranog silaska u strane planinskih masiva “Biokovo” i “Rilić” proteže makarska 7 vijadukata, 9 nadvožnjaka, 29 podvožnjaka, 2 prijelaza za D113 Makarska D62 Zagvozd. Vijadukt Dubrava, duljine 271 m, ima dva vozna i jedan zaustavni rivijera. životinje ČVOR RAVČA trak za svaki smjer vožnje, dopuštena brzina vožnje iznosi 130 km/h. Selca A1 40 Čvor Ravča nalazi se 9 km zapadno od grada Vrgorca te se veže na Ukupna duljina autoceste A1 Zagreb – Split – Dubrovnik te prateći sadržaji na autocesti: D115 D62, gdje je i spoj buduće spojne ceste Ravča (D62) – Drvenik (D8). Prijelaz za životinje je objekt koji nadsvođuje u jednom rasponu povećat će se za dodatnih 40 km, kolika je ukupna duljina 3 odmorišta i 1 centar za održavanje i kontrolu prometa. udaljenost u m Izgradnjom 1. etape buduće spojne ceste omogućuje se prometna cijeli profil autoceste, duljine 120 m. Dozvoljena brzina vožnje novoizgrađenih dionica Šestanovac – Zagvozd – Ravča. Tučepi veza čvora "Ravča", odnosno autoceste, na cestovnu mrežu niže iznosi 130 km/h. Bol Podgora Dimenzioniranje elemenata, horizontalne, vertikalne i Sva križanja s postojećom prometnom mrežom riješena su van BRAČ razine (D62 i šire vrgoračko područje). poprečne geometrije glavne trase izvršeno je za računsku razine. Spojevi s autocestom mogući su samo u čvorištima, a brzinu vr = 120 km/h. izgrađena su sljedeća čvorišta: D512 TUNEL ZMIJAREVIĆI Vrgorac Ravča ODMORIŠTE PLOČE Zagvozd 1 spoj na državnu cestu D62 Starigrad Hvar VIJADUKT RADONJIĆ Vrgorac Ravča spoj na državnu cestu D62 Jelsa LEGENDA 7. 540 VIJADUKT DRAČEVAC 1 Zagvozd 2 na državnoj cesti D62 Ploče A10 D8 SARAJEVO > D116 VIJADUKT DRAČEVAC 2 Na autocesti je predviđen zatvoren sustav naplate s tri cesta- IZGRAĐENO HVAR VIJADUKT VRILA rinska prolaza CP Šestanovac, CP Zagvozd i CP Ravča. U čvoru D62 A1 "Zagvozd 1" predviđa se izgradnja Centra održavanja i kontrole U PROMETU OD 2008. TUNEL PETROVAC DUBROVNIK > prometa COKP Zagvozd. D513 Metković U IZGRADNJI Ugovorena vrijednost radova građenja i opremanja dionica TUNEL MEĐAK Šestanovac – Zagvozd - Ravča iznosi 1.660.216.388,52 kune U PRIPREMI (bez PDV-a). udaljenost u m ČVOR ČEVELJUŠA Ploče Čeveljuša DRŽAVNE CESTE Opuzen D9.
Recommended publications
  • Dalmatia Tourist Guide

    Dalmatia Tourist Guide

    Vuk Tvrtko Opa~i}: County of Split and Dalmatia . 4 Tourist Review: Publisher: GRAPHIS d.o.o. Maksimirska 88, Zagreb Tel./faks: (385 1) 2322-975 E-mail: [email protected] Editor-in-Chief: Elizabeta [unde Ivo Babi}: Editorial Committee: Zvonko Ben~i}, Smiljana [unde, Split in Emperor Diocletian's Palace . 6 Marilka Krajnovi}, Silvana Jaku{, fra Gabriel Juri{i}, Ton~i ^ori} Editorial Council: Mili Razovi}, Bo`o Sin~i}, Ivica Kova~evi}, Stjepanka Mar~i}, Ivo Babi}: Davor Glavina The historical heart of Trogir and its Art Director: Elizabeta [unde cathedral . 9 Photography Editor: Goran Morovi} Logo Design: @eljko Kozari} Layout and Proofing: GRAPHIS Language Editor: Marilka Krajnovi} Printed in: Croatian, English, Czech, and Gvido Piasevoli: German Pearls of central Dalmatia . 12 Translators: German – Irena Bad`ek-Zub~i} English – Katarina Bijeli}-Beti Czech – Alen Novosad Tourist Map: Ton~i ^ori} Printed by: Tiskara Mei}, Zagreb Cover page: Hvar Port, by Ivo Pervan Ivna Bu}an: Biblical Garden of Stomorija . 15 Published: annually This Review is sponsored by the Tourist Board of the County of Split and Dalmatia For the Tourist Board: Mili Razovi}, Director Prilaz bra}e Kaliterna 10, 21000 Split Gvido Piasevoli: Tel./faks: (385 21) 490-032, 490-033, 490-036 One flew over the tourists' nest . 18 Web: www.dalmacija.net E-mail: [email protected] We would like to thank to all our associates, tourist boards, hotels, and tourist agencies for cooperation. @eljko Kuluz: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- Fishing and fish stories .
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
  • Split & Central Dalmatia

    Split & Central Dalmatia

    © Lonely Planet Publications 216 Split & Central Dalmatia Central Dalmatia is the most action-packed, sight-rich and diverse part of Croatia, with dozens of castles, fascinating islands, spectacular beaches, dramatic mountains, quiet ports and an emerg- ing culinary scene, not to mention Split’s Diocletian Palace and medieval Trogir (both Unesco World Heritage sites). In short, this part of Croatia will grip even the most picky visitor. The region stretches from Trogir in the northwest to Ploče in the southeast. Split is its largest city and a hub for bus and boat connections along the Adriatic coast. The rugged DALMATIA DALMATIA 1500m-high Dinaric Range provides the dramatic background to the region. SPLIT & CENTRAL SPLIT & CENTRAL Diocletian’s Palace is a sight like no other (a Roman ruin and the living soul of Split) and it would be a cardinal Dalmatian sin to miss out on the sights, bars, restaurants and general buzz inside it. The Roman ruins in Solin are altogether a more quiet, pensive affair, while Trogir is a tranquil city that’s preserved its fantastic medieval sculpture and architecture. Then there is Hvar Town, the region’s most popular destination, richly ornamented with Renais- sance architecture, good food, a fun atmosphere and tourists – who are in turn ornamented with deep tans, big jewels and shiny yachts. Let’s not forget the coastline: you can choose from the slender and seductive Zlatni Rat on Brač, wonderful beaches in Brela on the Makarska Riviera, secluded coves on Brač, Šolta and Vis, or gorgeous (and nudie) beaches on the Pakleni Islands off Hvar.
  • LOKALNI IZBORI - Drugi Krug Glasovanja 30.5.2021

    LOKALNI IZBORI - Drugi Krug Glasovanja 30.5.2021

    LOKALNI IZBORI - drugi krug glasovanja 30.5.2021. BROJ BIRAČA U POPISU BIRAČA NAKON ZATVARANJA REGISTRA BIRAČA ŽUPAN, GRADONAČELNIK/OPĆINSKI NAČELNIK, GRADONAČELNIK GRADA ZAGREBA DATUM: 21.05.2021. broj birača 1 ZAGREBAČKA ŽUPANIJA BEDENICA 1.092 BISTRA 5.677 BRCKOVLJANI 5.878 BRDOVEC 10.022 DUBRAVA 3.751 DUBRAVICA 1.128 DUGO SELO 16.791 FARKAŠEVAC 1.370 GRADEC 2.923 IVANIĆ-GRAD 12.257 JAKOVLJE 3.203 JASTREBARSKO 13.719 KLINČA SELA 4.507 KLOŠTAR IVANIĆ 5.310 KRAŠIĆ 2.083 KRAVARSKO 1.660 KRIŽ 5.709 LUKA 1.149 MARIJA GORICA 1.903 ORLE 1.619 PISAROVINA 3.045 POKUPSKO 1.790 PRESEKA 1.030 PUŠĆA 2.229 RAKOVEC 974 RUGVICA 7.131 SAMOBOR 33.210 STUPNIK 3.309 SVETA NEDELJA 16.189 SVETI IVAN ZELINA 13.643 VELIKA GORICA 55.543 VRBOVEC 12.060 ZAPREŠIĆ 22.080 ŽUMBERAK 753 Ukupno 274.737 broj birača 2 KRAPINSKO-ZAGORSKA ŽUPANIJA BEDEKOVČINA 6.519 GORNJA STUBICA 4.319 HUM NA SUTLI 4.030 KLANJEC 2.385 KONJŠČINA 2.985 KRALJEVEC NA SUTLI 1.367 KRAPINSKE TOPLICE 4.538 OROSLAVJE 5.291 PETROVSKO 2.039 STUBIČKE TOPLICE 2.552 ZABOK 7.630 ZLATAR BISTRICA 2.087 Ukupno 45.742 broj birača 3 SISAČKO-MOSLAVAČKA ŽUPANIJA DONJI KUKURUZARI 1.242 DVOR 3.906 GLINA 6.889 GVOZD 2.611 HRVATSKA DUBICA 1.584 HRVATSKA KOSTAJNICA 2.128 JASENOVAC 1.567 KUTINA 18.730 LEKENIK 4.972 LIPOVLJANI 2.654 MAJUR 925 MARTINSKA VES 2.596 NOVSKA 10.827 PETRINJA 20.750 POPOVAČA 9.775 SISAK 38.671 SUNJA 4.678 TOPUSKO 2.482 VELIKA LUDINA 2.084 Ukupno 139.071 broj birača 4 KARLOVAČKA ŽUPANIJA BARILOVIĆ 2.603 BOSILJEVO 1.039 CETINGRAD 1.832 DRAGANIĆ 2.346 DUGA RESA 9.234 GENERALSKI STOL 2.147 JOSIPDOL
  • Budget Transparency in Croatian Counties, Cities and Municipalities: November 2019 – April 20201

    Budget Transparency in Croatian Counties, Cities and Municipalities: November 2019 – April 20201

    NEWSLETTER Zagreb l Smičiklasova 21 doi: 10.3326/nle.2020.119 [email protected] l www.ijf.hr l tel: +385(1) 4886 444 No. 119 l July 2020 l ISSN 1848-4662 Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities: November 2019 – April 20201 KATARINA OTT, MIHAELA BRONIĆ, MIROSLAV PETRUŠIĆ, BRANKO STANIĆ SIMONA PRIJAKOVIĆ The overall average level of budget transparency in Croatian local government units2, expressed as the number of budget documents published on their respective official websites, stands at 4.1 (out of a maximum 5). The average value for counties stands at 4.9, for cities 4.5 and 4 for municipalities. Even though the average results keep improving year after year, around 20% of the local government units still fail to publish all three legally required documents, while 41% do not follow the recommendation of the Ministry of Finance for publishing two additional documents. Although the publishing of documents does not, in itself, guarantee absolute transparency, it is considered the initial step toward higher transparency levels necessary for citizens’ participation in the budgetary process and control over the collection and spending of public funds. In these exceptional times of crisis brought about by the coronavirus (plus the earthquake in the case of Zagreb and its surroundings), when revenues are lower and expenditures higher, such control is necessary even more. Exceptional circumstances should not act as an excuse for non-transparent activities that could affect, in both the short and the long term, efficiency and justness, the economic, social and political circumstances as well as the well-being of citizens.
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
  • Strategija Razvoja Općine Dugi Rat Do 2020

    Strategija Razvoja Općine Dugi Rat Do 2020

    STRATEGIJA RAZVOJA OPĆINE DUGI RAT DO 2020. GODINE SADRŽAJ 2.4.3. Obrazovanje 14 ISKAZNICA RAZVOJNOG PROJEKTA 3 2.5. Gospodarstvo Općine 16 UVODNA RIJEČ NAČELNIKA OPĆINE 4 2.5.1. Malo i srednje poduzetništvo 16 1. UVOD 5 2.5.2. Poljoprivreda 17 2. ANALIZA TRENUTNOG STANJA NA PODRUČJU 2.6. Turizam Općine Dugi Rat 18 OPĆINE DUGI RAT 6 2.6.1. Stanje turizma Općine 18 2.1. Geoprostorna obilježja Općine 6 2.6.2. Turističke manifestacije 21 2.2. Komunalna i prometna infrastruktura 8 2.7. Lokalna samouprava 21 2.2.1. Prometna infrastruktura 8 2.7.1. Proračun Općine 21 2.2.1.1. Cestovni promet 8 2.7.2. Socijalno osjetljive skupine i socijalna politika 23 2.2.1.2. Pomorski promet 8 2.7.3. Udruge civilnog društva 24 2.2.2. Elektroopskrba 9 2.7.4. Zaštita i spašavanje 26 2.2.3. Vodoopskrba 9 3. SWOT ANALIZA OPĆINE 26 2.2.4. Odvodnja 10 4. VIZIJA I STRATEŠKI CILJEVI 28 2.2.5. Bežični Internet (HotSpot) 10 5. PRIORITETI I MJERE 30 2.3. Povijesna i kulturna dobra 11 6. USKLAĐENOST SA STRATEŠKIM 2.4. Stanovništvo Općine 12 DOKUMENTIMA VIŠE RAZINE 42 2.4.1. Demografska situacija 12 6.1. USKLAĐENOST S EUROPSKIM STRATEŠKIM 2.4.2. Tržište rada 14 DOKUMENTIMA 42 6.2. USKLAĐENOST S NACIONALNIM STRATEŠKIM DOKUMENTIMA 45 6.3. USKLAĐENOST SA ŽUPANIJSKIM STRATEŠKIM DOKUMENTIMA 47 7. PROVEDBA STRATEGIJE RAZVOJA 47 2 ISKAZNICA RAZVOJNOG PROJEKTA Naručitelj strategije razvoja: 10. Slavica Demikeli, JUO Općina Dugi Rat Općina Dugi Rat, načelnik Jerko Roglić 11.
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)

    Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)

    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
  • A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS of REGIONAL ANESTHESIA to PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Micha

    A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS of REGIONAL ANESTHESIA to PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Micha

    A1 BAYESIAN RESPONDER META-ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA TO PREVENT CHRONIC PAIN AFTER ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT HARVESTING Michael H. Andreae , M.D.1, Matthew Johnson2, Henry Sacks3 1Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, 2Teachers College, Columbia University, 3Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Introduction: Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for autologous bone grafting. IBCG harvesting can lead to persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), devastating and difficult to treat (Brull 1992). Local anesthetics administration may reduce this risk (Singh 2007). PPSP trials typically report heterogeneous outcomes, making classical frequentist meta-analysis in our Cochrane review in print (Andreae 2012) challenging. To overcome this limitation, we developed a Bayesian model on regional anesthesia for the prevention of persistent pain after IBCG harvesting. We pooled dichotomous and continuous pain outcomes at varying follow up intervals. Methods: Methods were detailed in our systematic review for the Cochrane Collaboration in print (Andreae 2012). Search: Briefly, we searched the Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL (1966 to April 2012) without any language restriction using a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary. We searched conference abstracts by hand. Selection: We included randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials with pain outcomes at least 12 weeks postoperatively. Included studies compared local or regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for chronic pain after ICBG harvest. Data extraction: We assessed trial quality and extracted pain outcome, including information on adverse events. Bayesian model: We developed a longitudinal Bayesian model in OpenBUGS with three time points to estimate the posterior distribution of the odds ratio of chronic pain six months after surgery.
  • ENG Base Info

    ENG Base Info

    Dear guest, Our office is situated between pier D and E, and our vessels in pier D. Check in: Saturday from 4 p.m. Check out: Friday till 7 p.m. with overnight stay onboard till Saturday 9 a.m. The time between your arrival and boarding you can spend in restaurant or caffe bar in the marina, at beach near marina, you can go for a trip to the cities of Split or Trogir to do some sightseeing, or you can use this time to buy supplies for your stay. Charter documents: We require Crew list, skipper licence, VHF certificate and approximate time of client’s arrival, to be delivered to our office latest 1 week before charter. If requested documents and information are not provided on time, check in could be delayed. For check in please prepare: boarding pass and/or charter contract, deposit and payment if needed, and if you haven’t send before: crew list or ID/Pass for each crew member and passenger, Skipper and VHF license for all crew members,. Firm details and contacts: Yacht4You d.o.o. Tel: +385 21 222 300 Tax: HR 34264169669 Fax: +385 21 222 503 Franje Tuđmana 213 Mob: +385 91 6534 644 Ciril Vrančič, general manager 21 213 Kaštel Gomilica Mob: +385 91 6543 641 Asja Belančić, office manager Croatia Mob: +385 91 6543 640 Mario Jakić, base manager E-mail: [email protected] How to reach us: By car: If travelling by car the best choice is the highway A1. Exit the highway at Dugopolje, ride in direction of Solin / Trogir.