DOCSLIB.ORG

Rail Map REOP7 15.9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rail Map REOP7 15.9 1 2 A2B Drumgelloch - Bathgate Thurso reopening in progress due Dec 2010 by the Scottish Parliament Georgemas Wick 3 GARL Glasgow Airport new rail link by the Scottish Parliament November 2002 due to open 2012 but cancelled 2009 Passenger rail Helmsdale 4 Unrecorded, refer to 63 Golspie 5 Edinburgh suburban line reopening Lairg 59 November 2002, cancelled 2009 Dornoch 6 Penicuik reopening proposal network diagram November 2002 Tain Garve 7 Borders reopening under planning Invergordon by the Scottish Parliament Dingwall 8 Blythe & Tyne and Leamside lines reopening proposal September 2002 and Feb 2008 Nairn Elgin Under construction Also Ashington & Blythe and Washington proposals by Keith ATOC Connecting Communities June 2009 Achnasheen Inverness Strathcarron Inverness Forres 9 Penrith - Keswick reopening proposal 64 Airport Huntly Plockton 10 Stanhope - Bishops Auckland Stromeferry reopening proposal or proposed November 2002 Kyle of Lochalsh Aviemore Inverurie 11 Pickering - Rillington reopening to enable through service over Yorkshire Moors railway Kingussie Dyce 12 Wensleydale Railway: Northallerton - Leaming Bar - SCOTRAIL Leyburn - Redmire Principal routes November 2002 Regional routes 13 Rippon reopening proposal Spean Aberdeen Local routes July 2004 Glenfinnan Bridge Mallaig Limited service 14 Grassington branch reopening proposal September 2002 Blair Atholl Fort William Stonehaven Under construction 15 Skipton - Colne reopening proposal Planned or proposed* September 2002 Pitlochry New station 16 York - Beverley reopening proposal Rannoch Montrose by East Riding Council December 2006 London Underground Circle Line 17 Fleetwood reopening proposal Also proposed by ATOC Connecting Communities June Arbroath Glasgow Underground 2009 Tyndrum 18 Bootle - Aintree, Edge Hill - Bootle, St Helens Junction - Oban St Helens Central and Burscough curves reopening Dalmally Crianlarich Perth proposals Dundee Airport interchange by Merseyrail January 2007 Gleneagles St Andrews Ferry interchange 19 Woodhead route reopening proposal Cupar Stocksbridge - Penistone - Hadfield Arrochar & Tarbet Dunblane 61 capacity enhancement scheme by Railtrack Stirling Markinch 20 Caernarfon - Bangor line reopening Dunfermline Leven Places with multiple stations on different lines proposal Larbert Kirkcaldy October 2004 Garelochhead Alloa Inverkeithing 21 Sandbach - Northwich reopening proposal Balloch Grahamston Edinburgh Not all lines or stations shown Waverley 22 Matlock - Millers Dale reopening proposal Upper Falkirk Haymarket Reduced detail in major conurbations capacity enhancement scheme by Railtrack Helensburgh Milngavie SCOTRAIL North Berwick Lenzie 23 GN&GE joint line reopening proposal Central High Linlithgow Dunbar September 2004 Bathgate Dumbarton Central Maryhill Cumbernauld 5 * Based on information gathered since 2000 from rail Springburn Berwick-upon-Tweed 24 Wisbech line reopening proposal April 2002 Westerton Airdrie sources reporting that realistic sums have been spent Also Wisbech proposal by ATOC Connecting Partick 2 Communities June 2009 Queen Street Penicuik Glasgow Coatbridge Drumgelloch Newcraighall by local authorities, Railtrack, Network Rail and 25 Ivanhoe line: Burton-on-Trent - Leicester Port Airport GLASGOW 6 EAST COAST other relevant organisations on engineering and reopening proposal Glasgow 34Central Shotts Kirknewton 7 Also proposed by ATOC Connecting Communities June Gourock Whifflet market research. Many are not being pursued. 2009 Wemyss Bay Gilmour St Cambuslang Alnmouth Paisley Holytown Galashiels Heritage schemes are not included. 26 Stourbridge - Walsall - Lichfield 63 Largs Canal reopening proposal Newton Motherwell Also Brownhills proposal by ATOC Connecting Stewarton Tweedbank Communities June 2009 Ardrossan Kilwinning Neilston Hamilton Troon East Carluke Carstairs 27 Sections of Grand Junction main line Kilbride Wolverhampton - Stetchford now being Prestwick Kilmarnock 56 Lanark Morpeth used by new Wrexham, Shropshire & Larkhall Ayr Marylebone Railway service Stonehouse Girvan Ashington 28 Kings Norton - Camp Hill - New Street Lockerbie 8 reopening proposal (also a possible spur into Moor Street) Stranraer Dumfries Cambois See www.projectmapping.co.uk for other versions February 2006 Harbour 68 Annan Carlisle Newcastle Comments to [email protected] 29 Sunderland 30 Cambridge - St Ives branch Workington Haltwhistle Hexham Washington reopening proposal Durham August 2004 Bishop 8 Stockton Penrith Auckland Middlesbrough Keswick W Appleby 31 Saxmunham - Leiston reopening proposal Whitehaven Stanhope Saltburn Suffolk County Council supports a feasibility 9 E study when Sizewell nuclear power station 10 Eaglescliffe S Darlington Whitby is decommisioned, possibly 2012; extending T to Aldeburgh has not been ruled out Battersby November 2006 Windermere C Kirkby Stephen 11 O Scarborough 32 Cambridge - Haverhill (phase 1) - Sudbury A Pickering reopening proposal August 2004 Kendal S T 33 Stanstead - Braintree branch reopening Oxenholme Leyburn Leeming Bar proposal Lake District Filey September 2002 12 Northallerton Malton 34 Varsity line reopening proposal Settle Thirsk Barrow-in-Furness Ulverston Ripon Bridlington Two sections Bicester - Bletchley and Carnforth Bedford - Letchworth Hellifield Knaresborough Morecambe Grassington Ilkley 13 York 34b Alternative East-West route proposal via Lancaster Guiseley Driffield new Stewartby chord and new Luton- Heysham Port 14 Pocklington Stevenage line EWRC Mar 2009 Skipton Harrogate Church Clitheroe Keighley Fenton Stamford Colne Bridge 16 35 Northampton - Bedford branch reopening 15 Shipley Market Beverley proposal Fleetwood Whalley Forster Nelson Square Weighton 36 Aylesbury - M1/M6, Princess Risborough - 17 Hebden LEEDS Oxford, Princess Risborough - M42 and Preston Blackburn Bridge Bradford Gilberdyke spur to Bicester Town reopening proposals North Hull franchise proposals by Chiltern Railways Blackpool Kirkham & Burnley Halifax Interchange for Great Central main line. Subsequently Chorley Castleford Pontefract Selby Brough Chiltern to build spur for new Marylebone- South Wesham Todmorden Dewsbury Oxford service 2012/13 Darwin Rawtenstall Westgate Barton- New Holland 72 Huddersfield Kirkgate on-Humber 37 Dunstable reopening proposal Southport Bury Rochdale 18 Bolton Goole might be a guided busway Formby Salford Wakefield Ormskirk Skelmersdale Wallgate Crescent Grimsby 38 Stratford - Cheltenham reopening proposal DroylesdenStalybridge Doncaster Town capacity enhancement scheme by Railtrack Aintree 74 Wigan 55 Barnetby and NR/St Modwen Long Marton - Bootle North Victoria Adwick Cleethorpes Kirkby Western 67 Penistone Stratford South 4/08 New Brighton 18 MANCHESTER Hadfield Scunthorpe Habrough LIVERPOOL Piccadilly Doncaster 39 Link to Newport; proposed extension to Ebbw Vale Town Moorfields 18 Guide Barnsley 65 Airport Market Rasen from Parkway (could open 2010, previously 2014); and Bidston Lime Street Airport Conisbrough Central proposed Abertillery branch from Aberbeeg Bridge Glossop Swinton December 2007 West Kirby South Earlestown Romiley Gainsborough Birkenhead Parkway Marple 19 Rotherham Central Central Central Lee 40 Pontyclun - Beddau reopening proposal Warrington Stockport Chinley Worksop Road Lincoln by Sewta (South East Wales Transport Llandudno Heswall Runcorn Bank Quay Alliance) December 2006 Hooton Retford Bangor Colwyn Bay Prestatyn Shotton Ellesmere Port Altrincham Sheffield 41 Oxford - Witney reopening proposal Mansfield Holyhead Chesterfield Castle North 42 New Heathrow - St Pancras service, new Llandudno Rhyl Hartford Northwich Buxton Gate spur to GWML west and new line Heathrow Junction Chester to south 20 Newark Macclesfield 22 EAST COAST Skegness by BAA Caernarfon 21 Wilmslow Sheringham Hope Alfreton Hunstanton Holt 43 Betws-y-Coed Cromer Congleton Matlock Denbigh Sandbach Boston 44 Crossrail Grantham Sleaford 66 North Walsham by Transport for London Blaenau Fakenham Ffestiniog General Crewe Kidsgrove Derby 45 Portishead branch reopening proposal Criccieth 68 Hoveton & Wroxham Pwllheli Wrexham Central Alsager Nottingham 70 Kings Lynn Dereham 46 Bentley - Bordon reopening proposal target date 2017 Porthmadog WEST COAST Brundall Acle by Bordon’s transport group December 2006 Ruabon Nantwich Stoke- Uttoxeter Spalding Also proposed by ATOC Connecting Communities on-Trent 57 Great Yarmouth June 2009 Barmouth Corwen Wymondham Gobowen East Midlands Parkway Norwich Whitchurch Wisbech Downham 47 Cranleigh branch reopening proposal Stone Market Also proposed by ATOC Connecting Communities Tywyn 23 June 2009 Shrewsbury Loughborough Attleborough Reedham Machynlleth MIDLAND 24 Ely Welshpool Peterborough Thetford 48 Tavistock reopening proposal for 2011/12 Dovey Junction Wellington Burton-on- Diss Ealing Community Trust June 2007 Newtown Trent Stamford March Church Stretton Stafford Coalville Oakham Lowestoft 49 Eridge - Tunbridge Wells reopening proposal Aberystwyth Beccles 60 Bury 50 St Austell - Newquay Telford Central Cosford Alrewas 25 conversion of mineral line to replace route to Par St Edmunds Saxmundham Craven Arms Rugeley CROSS COUNTRY Leicester Melton Leiston Mowbray Woodbridge 31 51 Connection of Swanage Railway to main line and through Rhayader Huntingdon services Walsall Lichfield Stowmarket Wolverhampton Corby St Ives Westerfield 52 Fawley branch reopening proposal to Hythe Knighton Snow Tamworth Hinckley 30 Newmarket Ipswich Sandwell & Dudley Hill Market 53 Uckfield - Lewes reopening proposal Ludlow Nuneaton Smethwick Harborough Haverhill
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Environmental Case for High Speed Rail
    PAGE 4 THE UNION RAILWAY - ANDREW ADONIS PAGE 5 THE UNION RAILWAY - ANDREW ADONIS country. In the decade to 2006 passenger I believe that high speed rail could be kilometres rose by 42 per cent – the a revolutionary change for the UK, like highest rate of growth in Europe – and now the original railways of Stephenson THE UNION RAILWAY are at a higher level than at any time since and Brunel: not only a piece of new 1946. In contrast, Germany only achieved transport infrastructure, but a bold Andrew Adonis 22 per cent, Italy 5 per cent and France 34 economic policy for jobs and growth, per cent. Train punctuality and reliability a bold industrial policy to drive high- are at their highest level ever, thanks in tech engineering and innovation, and a part to modernisation of the train fleet; bold nation-building policy to promote A transport revolution is sweeping This global transformation led President and the number of services on the network national unity and help overcome the the world. High speed rail, largely Obama to observe recently that “High is at its highest level since Beeching. north-south divide, one of our most the preserve of Japan and France speed rail is not some fanciful pie-in-the- debilitating legacies from the past. until the 1990s, is now embraced sky vision of the future. It is happening More than £150bn has been invested by most major European and Asian right now. The problem is it’s been in transport infrastructure over the past Just look at the French, for whom the countries as their next generation happening elsewhere, not here.” decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Response to National Infrastructure
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION RAIL NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR THE MIDLANDS AND THE NORTH – CALL FOR EVIDENCE FOLLOWING INTERIM REPORT Contribution from Railfuture East Midlands Branch – August 2020 National Infrastructure Commission | Rail Needs Assessment for the Midlands and the North - Interim report https://www.nic.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/RNA-Interim-Report-Final.pdf Introduction: The Railfuture response dated 29th May 2020 to the first round of this consultation https://www.railfuture.org.uk/display2324 placed considerable emphasis on freight. In contributing to the August call for evidence, we in East Midlands Branch: Re-submit our May 2020 Rf EM Branch submission for previous NIC RNA call for evidence. This is on pp6-15 below in red text with a few subsequent additions in blue. Attempt to answer the NIC’s broad questions Q1 to Q4 below. References are to the pages and tables in the NIC’s Interim Report (see header.) Prepared by: Steve Jones, Branch Secretary, Railfuture East Midlands Branch [email protected] including contributions from members of EM Branch. Question 1: Please provide specific sources for evidence that the Commission could use in estimating costs and the impact of proposals on journey time and capacity. For schemes already proposed other than by Railfuture, such as those listed on p36, much information is already available from Network Rail, SNTBs (TfN, Midlands Connect), local and combined authorities, TOCs, DfT. Campaign organisations. For additional schemes put forward by Railfuture, further work would need to be done, though campaign groups such as SENRUG, SELRAP, MEMRAP and CRIL may have initial estimates for specific lines or areas.
    [Show full text]
  • East West Rail Western Section Phase 2
    EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 CONSULTATION INFORMATION DOCUMENT JUNE 2017 Document Reference 133735-PBR-REP-EEN-000026 Author Network Rail Date June 2017 Date of revision and June 2017 revision number 2.0 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Consultation Information Document TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Purpose of this consultation ...................................................................... 2 2.2 Structure of this consultation ..................................................................... 2 3. EAST WEST RAIL .............................................................................................. 4 3.1 Background ............................................................................................... 4 3.2 EWR Western Section ............................................................................... 5 4. EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 .......................................... 8 4.1 Benefits ..................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Location ..................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Consenting considerations ...................................................................... 11 4.4 Interface with the High Speed
    [Show full text]
  • Reunification East Midlands G R Y E a a W T C Il Entral Ra
    DONATE BY TEXT! REUNIFICATION EAST MIDLANDS G R Y E A A W T C IL ENTRAL RA THE UK’S BIGGEST HERITAGE RAILWAY PROJECT Reconnecting two halves of the Great Central Railway and joining them to Network Rail Supported by David Clarke Railway Trust Friends of the Great Central Main Line East Midlands Railway Trust www.gcrailway.co.uk/unify POTENTIAL EXTENSION TO TRAM INTERCHANGE NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT HERITAGE CENTRE RUSHCLIFFE HALT REUNIFICATION EAST MIDLANDS G R Y E A A W T C IL ENTRAL RA SITE OF EAST LEAKE STATION By replacing five hundred metres of BARNSTONE missing track between two sections N TUNNEL of the Great Central Railway, we can NOT TO SCALE create an eighteen-mile heritage line STANFORD VIADUCT complete with a main line connection. This is no impossible dream - work is CONNECTION TO THE MISSING MIDLAND MAIN LINE underway, but we need your help to SECTION get the next sections built. LOUGHBOROUGH LOCOMOTIVE SHED TO EAST LEAKE AND RUDDINGTON LOUGHBOROUGH CENTRAL STATION A60 ROAD BRIDGE REQUIRES OVERHAULING EMBANKMENT REQUIRES REPAIRING QUORN & WOODHOUSE STATION MIDLAND MAIN LINE BRIDGE ✓ NOW BUILT! FACTORY CAR PARK SWITHLAND CROSSING REQUIRES CONTRUCTION VIADUCT RAILWAY TERRACE BRANCH LINE TO ROAD BRIDGE TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING MOUNTSORREL RECLAIMED BRIDGE DECK HERITAGE CENTRE ROTHLEY EMBANKMENT STATION NEEDS TO BE BUILT POTENTIAL DOUBLE TRACK GRAND UNION TO LEICESTER ✓ CANAL BRIDGE NOW RESTORED LEICESTER NORTH STATION TO LEICESTER REUNIFICATION Moving Forward An exciting adventure is underway. Following Two sections of the work have been the global pandemic, we’re picking up the completed already, which you can read all pace to build an exciting future for the Great about here.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester Area Strategic Advice 2020
    How can growth and partners’ aspirations be accommodated in the Leicester area over the coming decades? Leicester Area Strategic Advice July 2020 02 Contents 01: Foreword 03 02: Executive Summary 04 03: Continuous Modular Strategic Planning 07 04: Leicester Area Strategic Context 08 05: Delivering Additional Future Services 12 06: Leicester Area Capacity 16 07: Accommodating Future Services 22 08: Recommendations and Next Steps 27 Photo credits: Front cover - lower left: Jeff Chapman Front cover - lower right: Jamie Squibbs Leicester Area Strategic Advice July 2020 03 01 Foreword The Leicester Area Strategic Advice forms part of the The report was produced collaboratively with inputs railway industry’s Long-Term Planning Process covering from key, interested organisations and considers the the medium-term and long-term planning horizon. impact of planned major programmes such as High Investment in the railway is an aid to long-term Speed 2 (HS2), and the strategies and aspirations of sustainable growth for the Leicester area, supporting bodies such as Leicester City Council, the Department economic, social and environmental objectives. of Transport (DfT), Midlands Connect and the Train Network Rail has worked collaboratively with rail and Freight Operating Companies. industry stakeholders and partners to develop long- The recommendations from this report support term plans for a safe, reliable and efficient railway to Network Rail’s focus of putting passengers first by support economic growth across Britain. aiming to increase the number of direct services from This study has considered the impact of increased Leicester Station, supporting freight growth and demand for passenger services in the medium and improving performance and satisfaction with the rail long term, starting from a baseline of today’s railway, network.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
    FFerr A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report March 2016 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project no: B2074900 Document title: Option Assessment Report Document No.: B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 Revision: 0 Date: 17 March 2016 Client name: Highways England Client no: Project manager: Simon Beaney Author: Robert Benson Jacobs U.K. Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/01/2016 Draft for client review RB SM/DW SB 1 17/03/2016 Final RB TB SB B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of report ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two Limited
    High Speed Two Limited High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) High Speed Two Limited H igh Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) March 2011 This r eport t akes i nto a ccount t he particular instructions and requirements of our client. It i s not i ntended f or a nd s hould n ot be relied u pon b y any third p arty a nd no responsibility i s u ndertaken to any t hird Ove Arup & Partners Ltd party The Arup Campus, Blythe Gate, Blythe Valley Park, Solihull, West Midlands. B90 8AE Tel +44 (0)121 213 3000 Fax +44 (0)121 213 3001 www.arup.com Job number High Speed Two (HS2) High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The December 2009 Report 1 1.2 Layout of this Report 1 2 Scope of Work, Methodology and Deliverables 2 2.1 Scope of Work 2 2.2 Meeting 1 2 2.3 Intermediate instructions 3 2.4 Meeting 2 3 3 Current Rail Operations and Future Developments 4 3.1 Context 4 3.2 Oxford - Bletchley 4 3.3 Aylesbury – Claydon Line 4 3.4 High Speed 2 5 3.5 Evergreen 3 5 3.6 East West Project 5 4 Functional Requirements 6 5 Site Location Options 7 5.1 Introduction 7 5.2 Quadrant 1 9 5.3 Quadrant 2 11 5.4 Quadrant 3 15 5.5 Quadrant 4 17 5.6 Sites on HS2 (north) 18 6 Cost Estimates 20 6.1 Matrix table for all Site options 20 7 Conclusion 21 8 Selected Option Development 23 8.1 General layout 23 8.2 Specific site details 27 8.3 Site operation 28 8.4 West end connections 29 9 Calvert Waste Plant 30 9.1 Rail Access 30 9.2 Heat and power generation 32 10 Use of site as a potential construction depot 33
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail)
    9th September 2013 Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail) campaign Briefing note on route options for the Central Section from Bedford to Cambridge Introduction The government and the Office of Rail Regulation have approved the upgrading and rebuilding of the railway between Oxford and Bedford, the Western Section of East West Rail. Railfuture is a long-term campaigner for the completion of the East West Rail project to Cambridge and into East Anglia. The Eastern Section of the route is already in use from Norwich and Ely to Cambridge via the soon to be opened Cambridge Science Park station; from Ipswich via Bury St Edmunds and Newmarket to Cambridge; and from Stansted Airport to Cambridge. Map 1: The East West Rail Link Between Bedford and Cambridge some of the original route is lost to development and population growth in the region has occurred away from the original stations. The question of corridor and route selection is therefore a key factor in making the case for the Bedford to Cambridge (Central) section of East West Rail. Railfuture is assessing the candidate corridors that have been identified by the East West Rail (EWR) Consortium. An early conclusion is that routes for possible approaches to the two nodes, Bedford and Cambridge, should be agreed and protected at an early stage, such is the pace of growth and development. Page 1 of 10 9th September 2013 Purpose The purpose of this document is to set out the options for EWR route options for the approach to Cambridge from the west. The options for Bedford will be covered by another document.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENDING OUR LINES - Safeguarding Railways for Reopening
    DEFENDING OUR LINES - safeguarding railways for reopening A report by Smart Growth UK April 2020 http://www.smartgrowthuk.org 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________________ Foreword by Paul Tetlaw 4 Executive summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Rail closures 9 3. Reopening and reinstatement 12 4. Obstacles to reinstatement of closed lines 16 5. Safeguarding alignments 19 6. Reopening and the planning system 21 7. Reopening of freight-only or mothballed lines 24 8. Reinstatement of demolished lines 29 9. New railways 38 10. Conclusions 39 Appendix 1 41 2 Smart Growth UK __________________________________________________________________________ Smart Growth UK is an informal coalition of organisations and individuals who want to promote the Smart Growth approach to planning, transportation and communities. Smart Growth is an international movement dedicated to more sustainable approaches to these issues. In the UK it is based around a set of principles agreed by the organisations that support the Smart Growth UK coalition in 2013:- Urban areas work best when they are compact, with densities appropriate to local circumstances but generally significantly higher than low-density suburbia and avoiding high-rise. In addition to higher density, layouts are needed that prioritize walking, cycling and public transport so that they become the norm. We need to reduce our dependence on private motor vehicles by improving public transport, rail-based where possible, and concentrating development in urban areas. We should protect the countryside, farmland, natural beauty, open space, soil and biodiversity, avoiding urban sprawl and out-of-town development. We should protect and promote local distinctiveness and character and our heritage, respecting and making best use of historic buildings, street forms and settlement patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2019
    JANUARY 2019 The Government has given Central Bedfordshire Council £1,976,000 extra cash to fix potholes CHAIRMAN’S LETTER Although CBC had promised to start repairing the High St in Autumn so far there is no action taking place and I intend to go back to the CBC for an explanation. It seems there are plans afoot to develop the site behind The Golden Bell and plans have been drawn up for presentation to CBC for planning permission. John Hartley, our previous Secretary and then Chairman passed away in the New Year after a battle with cancer, I vis- ited him regularly in his last months. He will be a great lose to The Society. I shall not be around for 1 month from 3rd January 2019 and John Sharp will Chair the meeting 24th January 2019. So I hope as many members as possible will attend to listen to Dr Brierley on Climate Change. Best wishes for a good New Year. Maurice Crowe Chairman The photo shows members watching Maurice present our petition to the Full Central Beds Council at their July meeting, at the start of our October Meeting. Andrew Selous at our November meeting stated that he is still on the case and apparently the gas board plans to dig up parts of The High Street is the hold up. 2 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL We hope you have enjoyed the variety of presentations. Membership renewals are now due for those members who do not have a standing order, please let Mike know if you would like to pay by Standing Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Strategy 2016 - 2020
    Economic Development Strategy 2016 - 2020 South Derbyshire Changing for the better Contents Foreword 3 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 6 Recent Events 8 Overview 11 Way Forward 15 Vision, Objectives and Ambitions 20 Acknowledgements The Economic Development team at South Derbyshire District Council would like to thank all those who have participated in the development of this Strategy. Further Information Economic Development, South Derbyshire District Council Civic Way, Swadlincote, Derbyshire, DE11 0AH, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1283 595755 Fax: +44 (0) 1283 595720 Email: [email protected] Web: www.south-derbys.gov.uk Photographs kindly supplied by featured businesses and Christopher Beech Photography, Louise Galdes Photography and Tony Summers 2 South Derbyshire Economic Development Strategy 2016 - 2020 Foreword South Derbyshire District Council’s Corporate Plan 2016-2021 sets out a Vision to make the District a better place to live, work and visit. ‘Progress’ is one of its four key themes and central to this is the continued support and development of the local economy. The South Derbyshire Economic Development Strategy will directly contribute to the achievement of the Progress objectives. These focus on economic development, inward investment, The National Forest, tourism and town centre growth. In order to further build on our significant achievements, the Council will continue to help grow and diversify our strong local economy to keep South Derbyshire well and truly open for business. This includes harnessing the potential of The National Forest. We will maximise opportunities for the future by encouraging the formation of new enterprises as well as the continued growth of existing businesses, helping to increase visitor spend, and attracting inward investment.
    [Show full text]