Revolution,Maple Leafs,Chry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revolution,Maple Leafs,Chry Revolution, Maple Leafs, Chrysanthemes and the Eagle By Beer (and special Thanks to Adler 17 for his contributions) PoD 1: The PoD that starts all is that in TTL 1848 the uprisings and Revolutions erupt with more force and become more widespread as the result of some early successes. In several cases the nations stand on shaky legs. Prussia as one nation hit hard by the Revolution sends a delegation to the Paulskirche Parliament with the young Rising Star Bismarck part of it. Bismarck is against the uprising, but after some time in Frankfurt sees the chance to use the Revolutionaries to give Prussia the top position in Germany. He marshals all his influence (he is well connected to the King´s court) to lobby for a Prussian acceptance of a to-be-modified Paulskirche constitution. Prussia thinking seriously about the Paulskirche proposal gives the Revolutionaries all across Europe hope and fresh drive. New revolts pop up or already began ones keep their momentum. Bismarck succeeds and after some gruesome negotiations on second May 1851 a united Germany is born. Several states close to Austria, despite the public opinion internally pro- Unification, decline to become part of Germany. But the more severe strife created TTL saps more of Austria´s strength and during the rest of 1851 and early 1852 all German states beside Austria join Germany. When Sardinia-Piemont with French help begins her Quest to unify Italy anew, overstretched Austria begins negotiations with Germany about what to do. To win time for negotiations and to stop a French allied Italy emerging, Germany and Austria help Guiseppe Mazzini´s Roman Republic. (OTL the Republic was smashed by the French protection of the Papal state, TTL France has other things on her plate first due to the stronger Revolution) While on the Italian peninsular a Civil War goes on, Austria and Germany try to find a solution for the trouble both nations have. In March 1853 they find it and after some tricky treaties Hungary becomes independent but closely allied to Germany. The Austrian half of the Empire (except Dalmatia and Galicia which become Hungarian, but with Burgenland gained from Hungary) accedes into Germany on the second birthday of the united Nation, creating Großdeutschland (Greater Germany). In 1857, both sides of the Italian unification war are war weary. France and Germany, who have other more important (for them) matters at hand, begin joint mediating and on New Years Day 1858 Italy is united. PoD 2 : In the 1860ties the growing Power of Germany was met with wariness by some circles in Britain, who wanted to preserve Britain´s position as THE Great Power at all costs. In 1864 it seems the time for testing Germany is ripe, when the Danish-German war erupts after Denmark tries to absorb Holstein fully. The British Government, under the weak in foreign matters PM Lord Palmerston, in a hipshot action backs the Danes. But the decision soon turns out to be rash and ill-advised. While Germany´s outnumbered small Navy does not even think about doing more than some coast patrolling against the Royal Navy, the British Army, lacking enough preparation time and fighting against the strategic genius of Moltke, march into an unmitigated disaster. At a battle near Flensburg the British-Danish forces experience what TTL historians often call “Second Waterloo”. The war is soon over after Flensburg. Bismarck, in his quest for stability in Europe, takes all of Schleswig and Holstein (Germany gives Denmark a small part of North-Schleswig back in 1952), but leaves all Danish Colonies in Copenhagen´s hand. The problem is peace with Britain. Germany never wanted war with Britain in the first place and has no means for bringing her superior land forces to the Isles. The German Navy is no match for the Royal Navy. So a rather tame treaty is a must and even the wish of Berlin, since Germany does not want Britain as a committed foe. On the other hand, the British land campaign was a disaster and resulted in a noticeable Prestige hit. In the “Great Game”, this meant Germany needed some spoils of war to show the world and her populace. Bismarck, as almost always with a feel for the best outcome in foreign matters, wanted Heligoland. Losing it would not hurt Britain in a serious way, while it could be shown as a token of victory and did improve Germany´s strategic position in the North Sea. But the new British Government tried a political play, adding a new chip into the pot. A “chip” called Rupert´s Land. See text below: Germany came to her first colony like the proverbial virgin to a child. Some circles in the British Empire, wanting to preserve her position as Great Power Number One no matter the cost, were wary about the German Unifications, but in the turmoil of the revolution years Britain had no chance of intervention. The time for intervention and testing the Unknown seemed to come when the 2. German-Danish War erupted 1864 after Denmark tried to absorb Schleswig and Holstein fully. The decision to back the Danes on short notice and the aftermath was much lamented for decades and the nickname of then Premier Viscount Henry Palmerston, “Lord Firebrand” became a curse in England. On sea Britain had no problems, the German Navy kept hugging the coast and ports, knowing their chances in open battle against the far more numerous Royal Navy. On land however, the British army, thrown into the fight with too much haste and after a string of mistakes in the gathering, experienced the most severe loss of the 19 th . Century. The scale of the disaster at Flensburg surprised even the commanding German Generals von Moltke and von Wrangel, who beat the British-Danish forces most masterfully. Many historians speak of this battle as the “British or Second Waterloo”. The fighting ended soon after, only some small skirmishes were fought until armistice. In the case of Denmark the proceedings were fast. The Danes lost all of Schleswig and Holstein, they could keep their colonies, but had to accept after the peace negotiations with Great Britain some “rest stops” on Iceland and Greenland for German ships on the Canada route. At the conference with England the problem was how to proceed. Germany had clearly won on land, but had no way to reach England with enough forces, so a negotiated and rather tame peace was a must. On the other hand Britain had lost the land war so miserably a white peace was not in the cards, the world public would not allow it and too much Prestige was lost at Flensburg. Bismarck did not want to make Britain a committed enemy, but after such victory he needed some tokens for the public eye and the other Great Powers to show. Both sides knew it would be a pain to find a solution the 2 nations could live with. It was one of those sentences only having impact at a special specific time in history, which brought Rupert´s Land into the “haggling”. Britain, in the hope that Germany would soon tire of this “conquest” and would be able to get it back from the “Jerries”, literally pushed the undeveloped, far away region into Germany´s lap. London would give Heligoland, which Bismarck wanted as a showcase and Britain could live without, only if Germany took Rupert´s Land as well. It would be a political gamble and a cheap way to peace for Britain. The new British Government, after the Flensburg debacle Lord Palmerston was history, wanted to get back as much international standing as possible. They admired Bismarck´s deft proposal. Loosing Heligoland would not hurt Britain in ways that mattered and Bismarck got the token he needed without creating bad blood. Adding Rupert´s Land in out of own volition, Britain would score points everywhere for her Magnanimity in “defeat”. Despite grandiose looking on paper especially after some embellishment by the British diplomats, Rupert´s Land was basically worthless in it´s present condition. Developing it would be a long, stony road measured in decades, not years. And costly decades at that! The plan was easy; Britain would get lots of prestige for her “sacrifice”, while burdening Germany with a foreign policy stone around her neck. There was even a betting pool established in the British delegation, how long Germany would keep “Rupprechtsland” (the German Name for it) after it became publicly known how undeveloped it was. While the more well-educated in Germany knew this, the public there and in other nations as well were blinded by the British propaganda. Soon the Germans would have a dilemma. Either they kept a grandiose looking, but expensive if one wanted to develop it, Colony or they sold it to someone. Selling it would mean a Prestige loss for Germany and a Prestige gain for Britain, since the Sell would show British superiority at the green table. In the eyes of the public England would have her “lecture”, while it was not really the case. First, Rupert´s Land was more or less company owned, so while looking like Britain lost territory, it was nothing truly important. Second, Germany would have problems with the region considering the travel circumstances. Third, with so much land, no matter it was practically wilderness doted with some outposts, changing hands, Britain would escape costly reparations, because for the public eye it was enough. Bismarck knew what the British tried to do, but the situation was a mess.
Recommended publications
  • The Auction Will Take Place at 9 A.M. (+8 G.M.T.) Sunday 18Th October 2020 at 2/135 Russell St, Morley, Western Australia
    The Auction will take place at 9 a.m. (+8 G.M.T.) Sunday 18th October 2020 at 2/135 Russell St, Morley, Western Australia. Viewing of lots will take place on Saturday 17th October 9am to 4pm & Sunday 18th October 7:00am to 8:45am, with the auction taking place at 9am and finishing around 5:00pm. Photos of each lot can be viewed via our ‘Auction’ tab of our website www.jbmilitaryantiques.com.au Onsite registration can take place before & during the auction. Bids will only be accepted from registered bidders. All telephone and absentee bids need to be received 3 days prior to the auction. Online registration is via www.invaluable.com. All prices are listed in Australian Dollars. The buyer’s premium onsite, telephone & absentee bidding is 18%, with internet bidding at 23%. All lots are guaranteed authentic and come with a 90-day inspection/return period. All lots are deemed ‘inspected’ for any faults or defects based on the full description and photographs provided both electronically and via the pre-sale viewing, with lots sold without warranty in this regard. We are proud to announce the full catalogue, with photographs now available for viewing and pre-auction bidding on invaluable.com (can be viewed through our website auction section), as well as offering traditional floor, absentee & phone bidding. Bidders agree to all the ‘Conditions of Sale’ contained at the back of this catalogue when registering to bid. Post Auction Items can be collected during the auction from the registration desk, with full payment and collection within 7 days of the end of the auction.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling the Story of the Royal Navy and Its People in the 20Th & 21St
    NATIONAL Telling the story of the Royal Navy and its people MUSEUM in the 20th & 21st Centuries OF THE ROYAL NAVY Storehouse 10: New Galleries Project: Exhibition Design Report JULY 2011 NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE ROYAL NAVY Telling the story of the Royal Navy and its people in the 20th & 21st Centuries Storehouse 10: New Galleries Project: Exhibition Design Report 2 EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT Contents Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Vision, Goal and Mission 2.2 Strategic Context 2.3 Exhibition Objectives 3.0 Design Brief 3.1 Interpretation Strategy 3.2 Target Audiences 3.3 Learning & Participation 3.4 Exhibition Themes 3.5 Special Exhibition Gallery 3.6 Content Detail 4.0 Design Proposals 4.1 Gallery Plan 4.2 Gallery Plan: Visitor Circulation 4.3 Gallery Plan: Media Distribution 4.4 Isometric View 4.5 Finishes 5.0 The Visitor Experience 5.1 Visuals of the Gallery 5.2 Accessibility 6.0 Consultation & Participation EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT 3 Ratings from HMS Sphinx. In the back row, second left, is Able Seaman Joseph Chidwick who first spotted 6 Africans floating on an upturned tree, after they had escaped from a slave trader on the coast. The Navy’s impact has been felt around the world, in peace as well as war. Here, the ship’s Carpenter on HMS Sphinx sets an enslaved African free following his escape from a slave trader in The slave trader following his capture by a party of Royal Marines and seamen. the Persian Gulf, 1907. 4 EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT 1.0 Executive Summary 1.0 Executive Summary Enabling people to learn, enjoy and engage with the story of the Royal Navy and understand its impact in making the modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colours of the Fleet
    THE COLOURS OF THE FLEET TCOF BRITISH & BRITISH DERIVED ENSIGNS ~ THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE WORLDWIDE LIST OF ALL FLAGS AND ENSIGNS, PAST AND PRESENT, WHICH BEAR THE UNION FLAG IN THE CANTON “Build up the highway clear it of stones lift up an ensign over the peoples” Isaiah 62 vv 10 Created and compiled by Malcolm Farrow OBE President of the Flag Institute Edited and updated by David Prothero 15 January 2015 © 1 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Page 3 Introduction Page 5 Definition of an Ensign Page 6 The Development of Modern Ensigns Page 10 Union Flags, Flagstaffs and Crowns Page 13 A Brief Summary Page 13 Reference Sources Page 14 Chronology Page 17 Numerical Summary of Ensigns Chapter 2 British Ensigns and Related Flags in Current Use Page 18 White Ensigns Page 25 Blue Ensigns Page 37 Red Ensigns Page 42 Sky Blue Ensigns Page 43 Ensigns of Other Colours Page 45 Old Flags in Current Use Chapter 3 Special Ensigns of Yacht Clubs and Sailing Associations Page 48 Introduction Page 50 Current Page 62 Obsolete Chapter 4 Obsolete Ensigns and Related Flags Page 68 British Isles Page 81 Commonwealth and Empire Page 112 Unidentified Flags Page 112 Hypothetical Flags Chapter 5 Exclusions. Page 114 Flags similar to Ensigns and Unofficial Ensigns Chapter 6 Proclamations Page 121 A Proclamation Amending Proclamation dated 1st January 1801 declaring what Ensign or Colours shall be borne at sea by Merchant Ships. Page 122 Proclamation dated January 1, 1801 declaring what ensign or colours shall be borne at sea by merchant ships. 2 CHAPTER 1 Introduction The Colours of The Fleet 2013 attempts to fill a gap in the constitutional and historic records of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth by seeking to list all British and British derived ensigns which have ever existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vom Kaiserreich Zur Republik Eine Tageschronik Vom 3. Oktober Bis Zum 9
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Dokumentation Vom Kaiserreich zur Republik Eine Tageschronik vom 3. Oktober bis zum 9. November 1918 © 2018 Deutscher Bundestag WD 1 - 3000 – 036/18 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Dokumentation Seite 2 WD 1 - 3000 – 036/18 Vom Kaiserreich zur Republik Eine Tageschronik vom 3. Oktober bis zum 9. November 1918 Aktenzeichen: WD 1 - 3000 – 036/18 Abschluss der Arbeit: 1. Oktober 2018 Fachbereich: WD 1: Geschichte, Zeitgeschichte und Politik Die Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages unterstützen die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei ihrer mandatsbezogenen Tätigkeit. Ihre Arbeiten geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines sei- ner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasse- rinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nur den zum Zeit- punkt der Erstellung des Textes aktuellen Stand wieder und stellen eine individuelle Auftragsarbeit für einen Abge- ordneten des Bundestages dar. Die Arbeiten können der Geheimschutzordnung des Bundestages unterliegende, ge- schützte oder andere nicht zur Veröffentlichung geeignete Informationen enthalten. Eine beabsichtigte Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung ist vorab dem jeweiligen Fachbereich anzuzeigen und nur mit Angabe der Quelle zulässig. Der Fach- bereich berät über die dabei zu berücksichtigenden Fragen. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Dokumentation Seite 3 WD 1 - 3000 – 036/18 1. Einführung Im November 1918 – vor genau 100 Jahren – brach mit der Niederlage im 1. Weltkrieg in Deutschland die Revolution aus. Sie führte zum Untergang der Monarchie und zur Er- richtung der ersten demokratischen Republik auf deutschem Boden. Mit einem täglichen Kalenderblatt blicken wir an dieser Stelle zurück auf ausgewählte Ereignisse jener Wo- chen. Damit erinnern wir daran, dass sich Demokratie und Freiheit in Deutschland nicht von selbst durchsetzten, sondern in einem heftigen Ringen erstritten werden mussten.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Drivers and Trends
    Opening Slide AAPA Port Property Management and Railing Seminar October 24, 2006 Anthony A. Chiarello Senior Vice President AMB Property Corporation ® TopMacro 20 Driversworld Ports and Trends Top 20 Worldwide Ports World Port Total Ranking Name TEU 1 Hong Kong 21,932,000 2 Singapore 20,600,000 9-Hamburg 7.0 8-RotterdamTransshipment 8.2 3 Shanghai 14,557,200 11-Antwerp 6.0 4 Shenzhen 13,650,000 5-Port LA/LB 13.1 14-New York/New Jersey 4.4 17-Tianjin 3.8 6-Busan 11.45 Los Angeles/ Long Beach 13,101,292 13-Qingdao 5.1 3-Shanghai 14.5 16-Ningbo 4.0 6 Busan 11,430,000 4-Shenzen 13.6 1-Hong Kong 21.97 Kaohsiung 9,710,000 10-Dubai 6.4 7-Kaohsiung 9.7 18-Laem Chabang 3.68 Rotterdam 8,200,000 9 Hamburg 7,003,479 10 Dubai 6,428,883 12-Port Klang 5.2 2-Singapore 20.6 15-Tanjung Pelepas 4.0 11 Antwerp 6,063,746 13 Port Klang 5,243,593 14 Qingdao 5,139,700 15 New York/New Jersey 4,478,480 16 Tanjung Pelepas 4,020,421 17 Ningbo 4,005,500 18 Tianjin 3,814,000 19 Laem Chabang 3,624,000 20 Tokyo 3,580,000 © 2005 AMB Property Corporation 2 ChinaMacro ShareDrivers of and Imports Trends China Share of Transpacific Import Volume (by TEU) Others 69% 1995 Others 50% China 2000 31% Others 34% China 2004 50% China 66% Source: PIERS Trade Horizons © 2005 AMB Property Corporation 3 MacroUS Import Drivers Share and Trends US Import Share by Country - 2004 Northeast Asia Southeast Asia Northern Europe Total 9.3 million TEUs Total 1.2 million TEUs Total 1.5 million TEUs Scandinavia Korea Singapore and other N Taiwan Belgium 6% 7% Europe 7% Philippines 17% 12% 12% Japan Thailand France 9% 35% 12% U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • KAISERIN UND KÖNIGIN MARIA THERESIA and the Crown- Princess Stayed on Board
    AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN BATTLESHIPS The following list contains all Austro-Hungarian battleships which were in commission dur- ing the Great War. (Compiled by András Veperdi) ABBREVIATIONS Arsenal: Naval Shipyard, Pola Arsenal Lloyd: Austrian Lloyd Shipyard, Trieste CNT: Naval Docks Trieste, Monfalcone CNT Pola: In the year of 1916 the CNT was evacuated from Monfalcone to Pola, where the submarine building was continued. Da Bud: Ganz and Danubius AG, Budapest (formerly: H. Schönichen Shipyard) Da Fi: Ganz and Danubius Shipyard, Bergudi, Fiume Da PR: Ganz and Danubius Shipyard, Porto Ré (today: Krajlevica in Croatia) Lussinpiccolo: Marco U. Martinolich, Lussinpiccolo (today: Mali Losinj in Croatia) STT: Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino, Trieste (Its name was Austria – Werft between the years of 1916 and 1918.) aa: anti-aircraft ihp: indicated horse power nm: nautical mile AC: alternating current IP: Intermediate Pressure oa: over all atm: atmosphere K: Austrian Crown pp: between perpendicular bhp: brake horse power kg: kilogram qf: quick firing (gun) cal: calibre km: kilometre Rpg: Rounds per guns’ barrels cl: class kts: knots rpm: revolution per minute cm: centimetre L: Barrel length in calibre sec: second constr: constructional LP: Low Pressure shp: Shaft horse power DC: direct current m: metre t: tonne(s) (metric tonne(s)) HP: High Pressure mm: millimetre wl: water line 1 SMS KRONPRINZ ERZHERZOG RUDOLF – Local Defence Ship SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf The after 30.5 cm gun of SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf Laid down : Launched : Commissioned : 25/01/1884 06/07/1887 20/09/1889 Later name: KUMBOR Builder: Arsenal - Pola Costs: 10,885,140 K Sister ship: She had not.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Made in Hamburg
    Shipping made in Hamburg The history of the Hapag-Lloyd AG THE HISTORY OF THE HAPAG-LLOYD AG Historical Context By the middle of the 19th Century the industrial revolution has caused the disap- pearance of many crafts in Europe, fewer and fewer workers are now required. In a first process of globalization transport links are developing at great speed. For the first time, railways are enabling even ordinary citizens to move their place of residen- ce, while the first steamships are being tested in overseas trades. A great wave of emigration to the United States is just starting. “Speak up! Why are you moving away?” asks the poet Ferdinand Freiligrath in the ballad “The emigrants” that became something of a hymn for a German national mo- vement. The answer is simple: Because they can no longer stand life at home. Until 1918, stress and political repression cause millions of Europeans, among them many Germans, especially, to make off for the New World to look for new opportunities, a new life. Germany is splintered into backward princedoms under absolute rule. Mass poverty prevails and the lower orders are emigrating in swarms. That suits the rulers only too well, since a ticket to America produces a solution to all social problems. Any troublemaker can be sent across the big pond. The residents of entire almshouses are collectively despatched on voyage. New York is soon complaining about hordes of German beggars. The dangers of emigration are just as unlimited as the hoped-for opportunities in the USA. Most of the emigrants are literally without any experience, have never left their place of birth, and before the paradise they dream of, comes a hell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communigator
    Ge Zs*e{ THE COMMUNIGATOR VOL 18 .No. 5 v T ' D .12 IS RTDIFONIS NTtlI i:,, .:1,r,... rORhI AR D-ACT IN8 TERROR ERECTOR EE E ERROR CORRECTOR and it measures only 6" x 4' x 20 Unlrke conve:tt:-: r::-'--:e:- l=l s':::-s :- s -:.'. one acts fori.,a'l c- . T.e -'c'-:: :- : ;-: s :::--:: 3. an encoder in th: i':-:-: L^: .'.-:- :^e^ ;:-:':::: : stream of pariil'b ts aq-a, :: :-= -':'-:: :- : :s A decoder in the Re:et'e U.,t -s.s l^as:::':. ::!:: detect and correct errors. But, beca,s: 3a:^ Da':. : : > computed from a scanntng of the inforn atro^ sra^3 a ':' : 20-bit length, the s'i stem has the remarkable a3 : ' :: correct'burst'errors of as many as 6-inforn'atlon-brts o us 6 parity-bits, as well as random errors. The TD 12 operates with normal 5-unit code teleprinter or data transmission equipment, synchronous or non-syn- chronous, at a number of speeds. lt is suited to HF and troposcatter radio links, as well as landline or submarine circuits. And because of its forward action it is ideal for one way transmissions such as naval traff ic broadcasts, meteoro- logical broadcasts, and all forms of data transmission. For f urther information please contact the Sales Manager, Communications Division :- REDIFON LIMITED COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION Broomhill Fload, Wandsworth, London, S.W.18. fe: 01-874 7281' A member company of the REDIFFUSION Group A 4 LIG HTWEIG HT the Services newest PROVEN adaptable- BCC 30 "Against intense competition the BCC 30 has been selected to f ill the 414 role for the British Services." The Alzl--BCC 30 is the lightest, smallest, fully transisto- rised, one man high power H F transmitter-receiver station with an output of up to 30 watts.
    [Show full text]
  • La Grande Guerra Lontana Dalle Trincee: La Questione Adriatica Dentro Il Conflitto Militare
    L'IDOMENEO Idomeneo (2018), n. 26, 115-134 ISSN 2038-0313 DOI 10.1285/i20380313v26p115 http://siba-ese.unisalento.it, © 2018 Università del Salento La Grande Guerra lontana dalle trincee: la questione adriatica dentro il conflitto militare Giuseppe Orlando D’Urso* Abstract. The control of the sea routes became urgent during the Great War because in the Mediterranean sea sailed English and French ships which, besides transporting goods and weapons, moved troops from colonial areas. In the northern area of the Adriatic, sheltered among the rocky coasts and the closed gulf of Cattaro, was installed the Austro-Hungarian fleet that through the Channel of Otranto reached the open sea and with the help of the submarines threatened the navigation of the Triple Entente. The control of the Channel of Otranto became therefore a priority. The neutrality position that Italy had assumed showed soon its uselessness because it would have meant staying out of the games and being crushed among the other great powers of Europe. The young Italian Royal Navy felt the urgency of opposing the dominance exercised in the Adriatic sea by the Austro-Hungarian and since 1909 it had elaborated military plans for the control of those coasts. The declaration of war of May 24th 1915 didn’t caught the Royal Navy completely unprepared and with the collaboration of the Allies prepared a barrier line at the entrance to the Channel of Otranto that, despite some deficiencies, opposed the Austro- Hungarian war activities and not a few were the naval battles recorded in the Adriatic sea. Riassunto. Il controllo delle tratte marittime divenne impellente nel corso della Grande Guerra poiché nel Mediterraneo transitavano navi inglesi e francesi che, oltre a trasportare merci e armi, spostavano truppe dalle aree coloniali.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Context and Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Dispute
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. A Question of Balance Political Context and Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Dispute David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Series 1, 1906–1925 Part 1: 1906–1919
    Confidential British Foreign Office Political Correspondence Germany Series 1, 1906–1925 Part 1: 1906–1919 Edited by Paul L. Kesaris Guide Compiled by Jan W. S. Spoor and Eric A. Warren A UPA Collection from 7500 Old Georgetown Road • Bethesda, MD 20814-6126 The data contained on the microfilm is British Crown copyright 1995. Published by permission of the Controller of Her Britannic Majesty’s Stationery Office. Copyright © 2005 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-530-X. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope and Content Note ........................................................................................................ v Source Note ............................................................................................................................. ix Editorial Note .......................................................................................................................... ix Reel Index FO 566 Registers of Diplomatic Correspondence Reel 1 1906–1907 ................................................................................................................... 1 1908–1909 ................................................................................................................... 1 Reel 2 1910–1911 ................................................................................................................... 1 1912–1916 ................................................................................................................... 1 Reel 3 1914–1916 ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Germany's High Sea Fleet in the World War
    (^urnell Hmucrsttij Sithrary 3tljata, Nrro fork Wjite historical ffiihcanj THE GIFT OF PRESIDENT WHITE MAINTAINED BY THE UNIVERSITY IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE GIFT nBnn0mVBrenrLIDrBr ~- D 581S3T l' tup*o 1924 027 832 744 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924027832744 GERMANY'S HIGH SEA FLEET IN THE WORLD WAR ADMIRAL SCHEER Germany's High Sea Fleet in the World War By Admiral Scheer x^L, With a Portrait and Twenty-eight Plans CASSELL AND COMPANY, LTD London, New York, Toronto and Melbourne 1920 PREFACE victor privilege THE has the of writing the story of the war ; for one mistrusts the vanquished, because he will try to palliate and excuse his defeats. But we are victors and vanquished at one and the same time, and in depicting our success the difficult problem confronts us of not forgetting that our strength did not last out to the end. Exceptionally tragic is the fate of our Fleet. It embodied the sense of power resulting from the unification of the Empire, a sense which was conscious of its responsibility to provide for the suitable security of our immensely flourishing political and economical ex- pansion. By creating a fleet we strengthened our claim to sea- power, without which the Empire must wither away, we remained a thorn in the side of the British, and their ill-will was the constant accompaniment of our growth.
    [Show full text]