DOCSLIB.ORG

Design of the WUFR-19 FSAE Suspension

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design of the WUFR-19 FSAE Suspension Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Independent Study Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science 1-11-2019 Design of the WUFR-19 FSAE Suspension Alex Levy Washington University in St. Louis James J. Potter Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/mems500 Recommended Citation Levy, Alex and Potter, James J., "Design of the WUFR-19 FSAE Suspension" (2019). Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Independent Study. 83. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/mems500/83 This Final Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Independent Study by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fall 2018 MEMS 400 Independent Study Project Design of the WUFR-19 FSAE Suspension Alex Levy – B.S. Mechanical Engineering ’20 Advisor: Dr. James Jackson Potter – Faculty Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Wash U Racing .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Role of a Suspension ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 WUFR-19 Suspension ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The FSAE Challenge and Constraints ................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 The Events ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Team Constraints .......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 System Constraints ................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Resources and Software for Design ................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Research Library .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Software Catalog ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4 Car and Sensor Data ........................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Collected Sensor Data ................................................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Basic Car Weight Parameters – BFR18 ........................................................................................................ 13 5 Tires and Tire Data .......................................................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Tire Selection ............................................................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Tire Data .............................................................................................................................................. 14 5.3 Application of Tire Data ...................................................................................................................... 19 6 Suspension Geometry ..................................................................................................................................... 23 6.1 Front View Geometry .................................................................................................................................. 23 6.2 Additional Points and Steering Geometry .................................................................................................. 33 7 OptimumKinematics Results ........................................................................................................................... 34 Going Forward ........................................................................................................................................................ 42 Appendix A: Additional Technical Information ....................................................................................................... 42 A.1: Spring Rates ..................................................................................................................................................... 42 References .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 1 List of Figures Figure 1: A Top View of a Double Wishbone Suspension with Toe Link [2, p. 643] ................................ 5 Figure 2: WashU Racing's BFR18 Double A-Arm Suspension .......................................................................... 5 Figure 3: The Skid Pad Schematic as Provided in the 2019 Rules [3, p. 123] ............................................. 8 Figure 4: The Autocross Schematic as Provided in the 2019 Rules [5] ........................................................ 8 Figure 5: The 2018 Endurance Track from FSAE Michigan [6] ....................................................................... 9 Figure 6: The Cardinal Planes for SU-93001-BA in SolidWorks .................................................................... 11 Figure 7: As an example, the 2019 Front Suspension Modeled in Optimum Kinematics .................... 12 Figure 8: The Definition of a Tire Slip Angle [1, p. 14] ....................................................................................... 15 Figure 9: The De-Identified Graph of Lateral Force Against Slip Angle for the R25B 18.0x7.5-10 [23] ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 10: The De-Identified Graph of Instantaneous Cornering Stiffness Against Lateral Force for the R25B 18.0x7.5-10 [23] ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 11: The De-Identified Graph of Instantaneous Cornering Stiffness Against Slip Angle for the R25B 18.0x7.5-10 [23] ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 12: Aligning Torque on the Footprint of a Tire [2, p. 70] ................................................................... 18 Figure 13: The De-Identified Graph of Aligning Torque Against Slip Angle for the R25B 18.0x7.5-10 [23] ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 14: The Bicycle Model [2, p. 127] ................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 15: The Steer Camber Curve for the 1.2g Left Turn .............................................................................. 21 Figure 16: The Front and Rear Wheel Center Planes Set a Distance Apart by the Wheelbase .......... 23 Figure 17: The Pitch Motion Loaded in to OptimumKinematics ................................................................... 24 Figure 18: SU-93001-BA with Front and Rear Track Planes on Both Sides of the Car ......................... 28 Figure 19: A Roll Center Height on a Suspension Geometry [2, p. 614]...................................................... 29 Figure 20: The Front View Swing Arm [2, p. 628] ............................................................................................... 30 Figure 21: The Heave Camber Change Rate ........................................................................................................... 31 Figure 22: The Roll Camber Change Rate ............................................................................................................... 31 Figure 23: The Final Front-Front View Geometry ............................................................................................... 32 Figure 24: The Final Rear-Front View Geometry................................................................................................. 32 Figure 25: Important Placement of Components within the Wheel ............................................................. 33 Figure 26: The Steer Camber Curve .......................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 27: The Heave Motion Modeled in OptimumKinematics ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Road & Track Magazine Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j38wwz No online items Guide to the Road & Track Magazine Records M1919 David Krah, Beaudry Allen, Kendra Tsai, Gurudarshan Khalsa Department of Special Collections and University Archives 2015 ; revised 2017 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Road & Track M1919 1 Magazine Records M1919 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Road & Track Magazine records creator: Road & Track magazine Identifier/Call Number: M1919 Physical Description: 485 Linear Feet(1162 containers) Date (inclusive): circa 1920-2012 Language of Material: The materials are primarily in English with small amounts of material in German, French and Italian and other languages. Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 36 hours in advance. Abstract: The records of Road & Track magazine consist primarily of subject files, arranged by make and model of vehicle, as well as material on performance and comparison testing and racing. Conditions Governing Use While Special Collections is the owner of the physical and digital items, permission to examine collection materials is not an authorization to publish. These materials are made available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any transmission or reproduction beyond that allowed by fair use requires permission from the owners of rights, heir(s) or assigns. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Road & Track Magazine records (M1919). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Conditions Governing Access Open for research. Note that material must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Dynamics and Performance Driving
    Vehicle Dynamics In the world of performance automobiles, speed does not rule everything. However, ask any serious enthusiast what the most important performance aspect of a car is, and he'll tell you it's handling. To those of you who know little to nothing about automobiles, handling determines the vehicle's ability to corner and maneuver. A good handling car will be able to maneuver with ease, zig-zag between cones, and frolic through windy roads. A poor handling car, however, will have trouble maneuvering, knock over cones, and will most likely end up in the ditch if trying to make its way through windy roads. Want to have fun while driving? Buy a good handling car. A car that can maneuver well will be safer and much more fun to drive. According to Racing Legend Mario Andretti, "handling is an automobile's soul." It determines the difference between a car that's enjoyable to drive and one that's simply a means for getting from Point A to Point B. According to their handling properties, cars such as the BMW M3, the Porsche 911 Carrera 4, and the Lotus Elise should bring the driver the most excitement (The Ultimate Driving Experience). While cars like the Dodge Viper may provide the driver with an abundance of power and speed, the poor handling may take away from driver excitement. So what makes a car handle well? A car's handling abilities are solely determined by how they obey the laws of physics. The physics of handling involves everything from forces to torque, so evaluating handling is an extremely complicated affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Analysis of a Multi-Link Suspension for Racing Applications
    Development and analysis of a multi-link suspension for racing applications W. Lamers DCT 2008.077 Master’s thesis Coach: dr. ir. I.J.M. Besselink (Tu/e) Supervisor: Prof. dr. H. Nijmeijer (Tu/e) Committee members: dr. ir. R.M. van Druten (Tu/e) ir. H. Vun (PDE Automotive) Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Department Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control Group Eindhoven, May, 2008 Abstract University teams from around the world compete in the Formula SAE competition with prototype formula vehicles. The vehicles have to be developed, build and tested by the teams. The University Racing Eindhoven team from the Eindhoven University of Technology in The Netherlands competes with the URE04 vehicle in the 2007-2008 season. A new multi-link suspension has to be developed to improve handling, driver feedback and performance. Tyres play a crucial role in vehicle dynamics and therefore are tyre models fitted onto tyre measure- ment data such that they can be used to chose the tyre with the best characteristics, and to develop the suspension kinematics of the vehicle. These tyre models are also used for an analytic vehicle model to analyse the influence of vehicle pa- rameters such as its mass and centre of gravity height to develop a design strategy. Lowering the centre of gravity height is necessary to improve performance during cornering and braking. The development of the suspension kinematics is done by using numerical optimization techniques. The suspension kinematic objectives have to be approached as close as possible by relocating the sus- pension coordinates. The most important improvements of the suspension kinematics are firstly the harmonization of camber dependant kinematics which result in the optimal camber angles of the tyres during driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Reinventing the Wheel Formula SAE Student Chapter California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 2018 Patrick Kragen [email protected] Ahmed Shorab [email protected] Adam Menashe [email protected] Esther Unti [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background – Tire Choice .......................................................................................................... 1 Tire Grip ................................................................................................................................. 1 Mass and Inertia ..................................................................................................................... 3 Transient Response ............................................................................................................... 4 Requirements – Tire Choice ....................................................................................................... 4 Performance ........................................................................................................................... 5 Cost ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Operating Temperature .......................................................................................................... 6 Tire Evaluation ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Simulation to Drive Formula Sae Design Decisions
    VEHICLE SIMULATION TO DRIVE FORMULA SAE DESIGN DECISIONS STEVEN WEBB MONASH UNIVERSITY 2012 SUPERVISED BY DR SCOTT WORDLEY Final Year Project 2012 Final Report SUMMARY This report covers the creation of a simple program that approximates lap time and energy for Formula SAE cars. In 2010 it was decided that Monash Motorsport would do a “clean sheet” design, so the simulation was made in order to find the effect each aspect of the car has on the cars total performance. This report also shows how to correctly validate raw test data against the equations used to create the model in order to improve the accuracy and understanding of the model and to calculate suitable performance metrics for the car. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Goals and Performance Metrics ........................................................................................ 5 1.2 Variations between different Formula events. .................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Scoring...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Track Layout ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design
    Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design Sponsored by the Cal Poly Formula SAE team A Final Report for Reid Olsen, FSAE Technical Director By: Suspension Solutions Design team Mike McCune - [email protected] Daniel Nunes - [email protected] Mike Patton - [email protected] Courtney Richardson - [email protected] Evan Sparer - [email protected] 2009 ME 428/481/470 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 7 FSAE Team History and Opportunity ......................................................................................................... 8 Formal Problem Definition ...................................................................................................................... 10 Objectives/Specification Development ................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: Background ............................................................................................................................... 13 Solid Rear Axle Design ............................................................................................................................. 14 Tire Research ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Design & Developement of an Aerodynamic Package for A
    DESIGN & DEVELOPEMENT OF AN AERODYNAMIC PACKAGE FOR A FSAE RACE CAR Diploma Thesis by Ioannis Oxyzoglou Supervisor: Nikolaos Pelekasis Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics & Turbomachinery Volos, Greece - May 2017 Approved by the tree-Member Committee of Inquiry: 1st Examiner: Dr. Pelekasis Nikolaos Professor, Computational Fluid Dynamics [email protected] 2nd Examiner: Dr. Stamatelos Anastasios Professor, Internal Combustion Engines [email protected] 3rd Examiner: Dr. Charalampous Georgios Assistant Professor, Thermofluid Processes with Energy Applications [email protected] © Copyright by Ioannis Oxyzoglou Volos, Greece - May 2017 All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT This Thesis describes the process of designing and developing the aerodynamic package of the 2016 Formula Student race car (Thireus 277) of Centaurus Racing Team with the use of CAD Tools and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). It further investigates the effects of aerodynamics on the vehicle's behavior and performance with regard to the Formula Student competition regulations. The methods used during the development are evaluated and put into context by investigating the correlation between the CFD results of the car model and the lap-time simulated counterpart. The aerodynamic package consists of a nosecone, two sidepods, an undertray, a front and a rear wing. The Thesis details all the stages involved in designing and optimizing these components to achieve the desired results and maximize the amount of performance enhancing aerodynamic downforce generated by the aerodynamic package, while maintaining drag force at low levels. 3 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 7 2. AERODYNAMICS OF A FSAE RACE CAR .......................................................... 8 2.1. Introduction to Race Car Aerodynamics ........................................................ 8 2.1.1. Downforce .................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, May 8, 2019
    Wednesday, May 8, 2019 AVL 9:45 – 11:15 a.m. Suite 216 Performance Trade off Analysis What if decisions for your next car will be made on objective numbers rather than subjective feedback from previous team members? Using simulation tools early in the development process can help to speed up the development significantly. Not only that, if done in a structured way it can help vehicle performance on track and justify your design decisions. AVL will present a process on how to focus the development of your car on the “right” technical measures using a virtual environment. Presenter: Thomas Mueller-Werth, Group Leader - Vehicle Engineering ZF 9:45 – 11:15 a.m. Suite 218 0 to 60: From Formula SAE to Career - A dynamic panel of professionals discuss their career paths and experiences Only one year ago Justin Rujan and Filipp Balayev were where you are today – tirelessly building and perfecting their cars as part of University of Michigan – Dearborn’s Formula SAE team. Justin and Filipp learned valuable technical and leadership skills as they helped build, compete and manage multiple top 10 cars. They carried these engineering skills and experiences past graduation and into their careers. Today, they are both calibration engineers within ZF’s powertrain group. Eric Shelleman earned his degree from Clemson University and honed his skills in the university machine shop. Now as a part of the ZF Race Engineering group, Eric develops, produces and distributes ZF core products in the field of driveline and chassis technology for race car applications to various motorsport series around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Tire Model with Temperature Effects for Formula SAE Vehicle
    applied sciences Article Tire Model with Temperature Effects for Formula SAE Vehicle Diwakar Harsh 1 and Barys Shyrokau 2,* 1 Rimac Automobili d.o.o., 10431 Sveta Nedelja, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 October 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 6 December 2019 Abstract: Formula Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (FSAE) is a student design competition organized by SAE International (previously known as the Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE). Commonly, the student team performs a lap simulation as a point mass, bicycle or planar model of vehicle dynamics allow for the design of a top-level concept of the FSAE vehicle. However, to design different FSAE components, a full vehicle simulation is required including a comprehensive tire model. In the proposed study, the different tires of a FSAE vehicle were tested at a track to parametrize the tire based on the empirical approach commonly known as the magic formula. A thermal tire model was proposed to describe the tread, carcass, and inflation gas temperatures. The magic formula was modified to incorporate the temperature effect on the force capability of a FSAE tire to achieve higher accuracy in the simulation environment. Considering the model validation, the several maneuvers, typical for FSAE competitions, were performed. A skidpad and full lap maneuvers were chosen to simulate steady-state and transient behavior of the FSAE vehicle. The full vehicle simulation results demonstrated a high correlation to the measurement data for steady-state maneuvers and limited accuracy in highly dynamic driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Validation of a Single Mass Lap Simulation Jeremy
    Development and Validation Of a Single Mass Lap Simulation by Jeremy R. Noel Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Mechanical Engineering May 8, 2020 Certified by. Ian Hunter George N. Hatsopoulos Professor in Thermodynamics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Maria Yang Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Development and Validation Of a Single Mass Lap Simulation by Jeremy R. Noel Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 8, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract In this thesis, a single mass model lap time simulation was designed, implemented and validated in MATLAB. The goal of this simulation was to accurately predict the velocity of a formula style open wheeled race car on a given track. The simulation was constructed in MATLAB, and features a function based design that will allow the core algorithm to be used with more sophisticated vehicle models. The code was tested and validated using a combination of contrived and collected map data, and a strong correlation of 0.8067 was shown with 95% confidence bounds of 0.8028, and 0.8105. Finally, this thesis outlines proper testing techniques to obtain the data required to complete the validation process of this simulation. Thesis Supervisor: Ian Hunter Title: George N. Hatsopoulos Professor in Thermodynamics 3 4 Acknowledgments There are so many people I would like to thank who have made this research and development project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford RSC 1 ROLL RATE BASED STABILITY CONTROL
    ROLL RATE BASED STABILITY CONTROL - THE ROLL STABILITY CONTROL ™ SYSTEM Jianbo Lu Dave Messih Albert Salib Ford Motor Company United States Paper Number 07-136 ABSTRACT precise detection of potential rollover conditions and driving conditions such as road bank and vehicle This paper presents the Roll Stability Control ™ loading, the aforementioned approaches need to system developed at Ford Motor Company. It is an conduct necessary trade-offs between control active safety system for passenger vehicles. It uses a sensitivity and robustness. roll rate sensor together with the information from the conventional electronic stability control hardware to In this paper, a system referred to as Roll Stability detect a vehicle's roll condition associated with a Control™ (RSC), is presented. Such a system is potential rollover and executes proper brake control designed specifically to mitigate vehicular rollovers. and engine torque reduction in response to the The idea of RSC, first documented in [10], was detected roll condition so as to mitigate a vehicular developed at Ford Motor Company and has been rollover. implemented on various vehicles within Ford Motor Company since its debut on the 2003 Volvo XC90. INTRODUCTION The RSC system adds a roll rate sensor and necessary control algorithms to an existing ESC system. The The traditional electronic stability control (ESC) roll rate sensor, together with the information from systems aim to control the yaw and sideslip angle of a the ESC system, help to effectively identify the moving vehicle through individual wheel braking and critical roll conditions which could lead to a potential engine torque reduction such that the desired path of vehicular rollover.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Guide
    Volume 4 ® Application Guide “Horsepower for your Suspension ® ” 877.466.7655 • Hotchkis.net ® About Us All About The experience of John Hotchkis and the entire Hotchkis Performance team ensures that you receive high quality products engineered to perform and designed to be strong. Our suspension controls many of the fastest cars in the country, from 8-second quarter mile Grand Nationals, Mustangs and Chevelles to canyon carving, street cruising Camaros, Monte Carlos, Impala SS’s and Corvettes. Numerous road racing, drag racing, and autocross racing teams rely and win with Hotchkis Performance products. When the best magazines choose suspension products, Hotchkis Performance is there. Just ask the editors of Hot Rod, Motor Trend, Car Craft, Chevy High Performance, Super Chevy, Street Trucks, and Truckin’. Dear Fellow Car Enthusiast, Thank you for your support and continued loyalty. It is hard to believe that it has been two decades since Hotchkis Performance products were first introduced to the aftermarket. We have grown tremendously since then because we have continued to pursue our original design goal to produce the highest quality suspension components that dramatically improve the handling, stability, and traction of Muscle Cars, trucks, European cars, and Japanese import cars. Our TVS (Total Vehicle System) suspension kits are a complete handling solution that contains engineered and tuned components that work together to improve your performance vehicle’s handling. All of these kits have passed our rigorous in-house testing procedures including slalom, skid pad, autocross and road course testing, and quarter mile testing. We are proud to say that the majority of our staff’s personal vehicles are equipped with Hotchkis Performance products and these are the people you will talk to on the phone for answers to your technical questions.
    [Show full text]