DOCSLIB.ORG

Design & Developement of an Aerodynamic Package for A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design & Developement of an Aerodynamic Package for A DESIGN & DEVELOPEMENT OF AN AERODYNAMIC PACKAGE FOR A FSAE RACE CAR Diploma Thesis by Ioannis Oxyzoglou Supervisor: Nikolaos Pelekasis Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics & Turbomachinery Volos, Greece - May 2017 Approved by the tree-Member Committee of Inquiry: 1st Examiner: Dr. Pelekasis Nikolaos Professor, Computational Fluid Dynamics [email protected] 2nd Examiner: Dr. Stamatelos Anastasios Professor, Internal Combustion Engines [email protected] 3rd Examiner: Dr. Charalampous Georgios Assistant Professor, Thermofluid Processes with Energy Applications [email protected] © Copyright by Ioannis Oxyzoglou Volos, Greece - May 2017 All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT This Thesis describes the process of designing and developing the aerodynamic package of the 2016 Formula Student race car (Thireus 277) of Centaurus Racing Team with the use of CAD Tools and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). It further investigates the effects of aerodynamics on the vehicle's behavior and performance with regard to the Formula Student competition regulations. The methods used during the development are evaluated and put into context by investigating the correlation between the CFD results of the car model and the lap-time simulated counterpart. The aerodynamic package consists of a nosecone, two sidepods, an undertray, a front and a rear wing. The Thesis details all the stages involved in designing and optimizing these components to achieve the desired results and maximize the amount of performance enhancing aerodynamic downforce generated by the aerodynamic package, while maintaining drag force at low levels. 3 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 7 2. AERODYNAMICS OF A FSAE RACE CAR .......................................................... 8 2.1. Introduction to Race Car Aerodynamics ........................................................ 8 2.1.1. Downforce .................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2. Drag Force .................................................................................................. 9 2.1.3. CL, CD Coefficients ..................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Wings Theory ............................................................................................ 11 2.1.5. Venturi & Ground Effects ......................................................................... 14 2.2. FSAE Aerodynamic Devices .......................................................................... 16 2.2.1. Nosecone .................................................................................................. 16 2.2.2. Front wing ................................................................................................. 18 2.2.3. Rear Wing ................................................................................................. 21 2.2.4. Undertray Diffuser .................................................................................... 24 2.2.5. Sidepods ................................................................................................... 27 2.2.6. Brake Cooling Ducts .................................................................................. 29 2.2.7. Flip-Ups ..................................................................................................... 30 2.2.8. Suspension Wishbone Covers .................................................................. 31 2.3. Aerodynamic Forces Distribution & Balance ................................................. 32 3. SETUP OF THE CFD MODELS ........................................................................ 36 3.1. pre-Processing ............................................................................................. 37 3.1.1. Geometry “Clean-up” ............................................................................... 37 3.1.2. Creation of Fluid Domain ......................................................................... 38 3.1.3. Mesh Creation .......................................................................................... 39 3.1.4. pre-Processing of the CFD Models for the Aerodynamic Package .......... 44 3.2. Solving Process ............................................................................................ 57 3.2.1. General Settings ....................................................................................... 58 3.2.2. Viscus Models ........................................................................................... 60 3.2.3. Boundary Conditions ................................................................................ 63 3.2.4. Reference Values ...................................................................................... 67 4 3.2.5. Solution Methods ..................................................................................... 68 3.2.6. Solution Controls ...................................................................................... 71 3.2.7. Monitors ................................................................................................... 72 3.2.8. Solution Initialization ................................................................................ 73 4. CFD SIMULATIONS RESULTS ANALYSIS ........................................................ 75 4.1. Nosecone .................................................................................................... 75 4.1.1. Horizontal Nosecone ................................................................................ 75 4.1.2. Vertical Nosecone..................................................................................... 76 4.1.3. Angled Nosecone ...................................................................................... 77 4.1.4. Final Nosecone ......................................................................................... 78 4.1.5. Results Comparison .................................................................................. 79 4.2. Undertray .................................................................................................... 80 4.2.1. Single Diffuser ........................................................................................... 80 4.2.2. Separated Rear Diffusers with Splitter ..................................................... 81 4.2.3. Separate Rear Diffusers ............................................................................ 82 4.2.4. Side Diffusers ............................................................................................ 84 4.2.5. Side & Double Diffusers ............................................................................ 86 4.2.6. Results Comparison .................................................................................. 89 4.3. Sidepods ..................................................................................................... 90 4.3.1. No Sidepods .............................................................................................. 92 4.3.2. Lowered Sidepods .................................................................................... 93 4.3.3. Lifted Sidepods ......................................................................................... 94 4.3.4. Final Sidepods ........................................................................................... 95 4.4. Wings .......................................................................................................... 98 4.4.1. Front Wing ................................................................................................ 98 4.4.2. Rear Wing ............................................................................................... 104 4.5. Whole Car Models ..................................................................................... 108 4.5.1. Model without an Aerodynamic Package .............................................. 108 4.5.2. Model with Undertray & Sidepods ......................................................... 112 4.5.3. Model with a Full Aerodynamic Package ............................................... 116 4.5.4. Results Comparison ................................................................................ 121 5. LAP-TIME SIMULATIONS & VALUATION OF THE RESSULTS ........................ 123 5.1. Without Aerodynamic Devices ................................................................... 124 5 5.2. Undertray & Sidepods ............................................................................... 125 5.3. Full Aerodynamic Package ......................................................................... 127 5.4. Track Results Comparison .......................................................................... 128 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 132 SOFTWARE USED .......................................................................................... 134 6 1. INTRODUCTION Aerodynamics is the science of how air flows around and inside objects. More generally, it can be labeled “Fluid Dynamics” because air is really just a very thin type of fluid. Above slow speeds, the air flow around and through a vehicle begins to have a more pronounced effect on the acceleration, top speed, fuel efficiency and handling. Therefore, to build the most efficient possible race car it is needed to understand and optimize how the air flows around and through the body, its openings and its aerodynamic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures Yeuhi Abe AKER
    --A Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures by Yeuhi Abe Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science and Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2007 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007. All rights reserved. Author ....... Departmet of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Febri- '. 2007 Certified by Jovan Popovid Associate Professor or Accepted by........... Arthur C.Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students MASSACHUSETTS INSTInfrE OF TECHNOLOGY APR 3 0 2007 AKER LIBRARIES Towards Adaptive and Directable Control of Simulated Creatures by Yeuhi Abe Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on February 2, 2007, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science and Engineering Abstract Interactive animation is used ubiquitously for entertainment and for the communi- cation of ideas. Active creatures, such as humans, robots, and animals, are often at the heart of such animation and are required to interact in compelling and lifelike ways with their virtual environment. Physical simulation handles such interaction correctly, with a principled approach that adapts easily to different circumstances, changing environments, and unexpected disturbances. However, developing robust control strategies that result in natural motion of active creatures within physical simulation has proved to be a difficult problem. To address this issue, a new and ver- satile algorithm for the low-level control of animated characters has been developed and tested. It simplifies the process of creating control strategies by automatically ac- counting for many parameters of the simulation, including the physical properties of the creature and the contact forces between the creature and the virtual environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.6 Moments and Center of Mass in This Section We Want to find a Point on Which a Thin Plate of Any Given Shape Balances Horizontally As in Figure 7.6.1
    Arkansas Tech University MATH 2924: Calculus II Dr. Marcel B. Finan 7.6 Moments and Center of Mass In this section we want to find a point on which a thin plate of any given shape balances horizontally as in Figure 7.6.1. Figure 7.6.1 The center of mass is the so-called \balancing point" of an object (or sys- tem.) For example, when two children are sitting on a seesaw, the point at which the seesaw balances, i.e. becomes horizontal is the center of mass of the seesaw. Discrete Point Masses: One Dimensional Case Consider again the example of two children of mass m1 and m2 sitting on each side of a seesaw. It can be shown experimentally that the center of mass is a point P on the seesaw such that m1d1 = m2d2 where d1 and d2 are the distances from m1 and m2 to P respectively. See Figure 7.6.2. In order to generalize this concept, we introduce an x−axis with points m1 and m2 located at points with coordinates x1 and x2 with x1 < x2: Figure 7.6.2 1 Since P is the balancing point, we must have m1(x − x1) = m2(x2 − x): Solving for x we find m x + m x x = 1 1 2 2 : m1 + m2 The product mixi is called the moment of mi about the origin. The above result can be extended to a system with many points as follows: The center of mass of a system of n point-masses m1; m2; ··· ; mn located at x1; x2; ··· ; xn along the x−axis is given by the formula n X mixi i=1 Mo x = n = X m mi i=1 n X where the sum Mo = mixi is called the moment of the system about i=1 Pn the origin and m = i=1 mn is the total mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Road & Track Magazine Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j38wwz No online items Guide to the Road & Track Magazine Records M1919 David Krah, Beaudry Allen, Kendra Tsai, Gurudarshan Khalsa Department of Special Collections and University Archives 2015 ; revised 2017 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Road & Track M1919 1 Magazine Records M1919 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Road & Track Magazine records creator: Road & Track magazine Identifier/Call Number: M1919 Physical Description: 485 Linear Feet(1162 containers) Date (inclusive): circa 1920-2012 Language of Material: The materials are primarily in English with small amounts of material in German, French and Italian and other languages. Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 36 hours in advance. Abstract: The records of Road & Track magazine consist primarily of subject files, arranged by make and model of vehicle, as well as material on performance and comparison testing and racing. Conditions Governing Use While Special Collections is the owner of the physical and digital items, permission to examine collection materials is not an authorization to publish. These materials are made available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any transmission or reproduction beyond that allowed by fair use requires permission from the owners of rights, heir(s) or assigns. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Road & Track Magazine records (M1919). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Conditions Governing Access Open for research. Note that material must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Dynamics and Performance Driving
    Vehicle Dynamics In the world of performance automobiles, speed does not rule everything. However, ask any serious enthusiast what the most important performance aspect of a car is, and he'll tell you it's handling. To those of you who know little to nothing about automobiles, handling determines the vehicle's ability to corner and maneuver. A good handling car will be able to maneuver with ease, zig-zag between cones, and frolic through windy roads. A poor handling car, however, will have trouble maneuvering, knock over cones, and will most likely end up in the ditch if trying to make its way through windy roads. Want to have fun while driving? Buy a good handling car. A car that can maneuver well will be safer and much more fun to drive. According to Racing Legend Mario Andretti, "handling is an automobile's soul." It determines the difference between a car that's enjoyable to drive and one that's simply a means for getting from Point A to Point B. According to their handling properties, cars such as the BMW M3, the Porsche 911 Carrera 4, and the Lotus Elise should bring the driver the most excitement (The Ultimate Driving Experience). While cars like the Dodge Viper may provide the driver with an abundance of power and speed, the poor handling may take away from driver excitement. So what makes a car handle well? A car's handling abilities are solely determined by how they obey the laws of physics. The physics of handling involves everything from forces to torque, so evaluating handling is an extremely complicated affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Development of a IUPUI Formula SAE Specification Car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) Analysis
    Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis Ponnappa Bheemaiah Meederira, Indiana- University Purdue- University. Indianapolis Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis A Directed Project Final Report Submitted to the Faculty Of Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indianapolis By Ponnappa Bheemaiah Meederira, In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology Committee Member Approval Signature Date Peter Hylton, Chair Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Andrew Borme Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Ken Rennels Technology _______________________________________ ____________ Aerodynamic development of a IUPUI Formula SAE specification car with Computational 3 Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis Table of Contents 1. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 3. Problem statement ..................................................................................................................... 7 4. Significance............................................................................................................................... 7 5. Literature review
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Analysis of a Multi-Link Suspension for Racing Applications
    Development and analysis of a multi-link suspension for racing applications W. Lamers DCT 2008.077 Master’s thesis Coach: dr. ir. I.J.M. Besselink (Tu/e) Supervisor: Prof. dr. H. Nijmeijer (Tu/e) Committee members: dr. ir. R.M. van Druten (Tu/e) ir. H. Vun (PDE Automotive) Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Department Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control Group Eindhoven, May, 2008 Abstract University teams from around the world compete in the Formula SAE competition with prototype formula vehicles. The vehicles have to be developed, build and tested by the teams. The University Racing Eindhoven team from the Eindhoven University of Technology in The Netherlands competes with the URE04 vehicle in the 2007-2008 season. A new multi-link suspension has to be developed to improve handling, driver feedback and performance. Tyres play a crucial role in vehicle dynamics and therefore are tyre models fitted onto tyre measure- ment data such that they can be used to chose the tyre with the best characteristics, and to develop the suspension kinematics of the vehicle. These tyre models are also used for an analytic vehicle model to analyse the influence of vehicle pa- rameters such as its mass and centre of gravity height to develop a design strategy. Lowering the centre of gravity height is necessary to improve performance during cornering and braking. The development of the suspension kinematics is done by using numerical optimization techniques. The suspension kinematic objectives have to be approached as close as possible by relocating the sus- pension coordinates. The most important improvements of the suspension kinematics are firstly the harmonization of camber dependant kinematics which result in the optimal camber angles of the tyres during driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Tools and Methods for Chassis and Vehicle Dynamics Development for FSAE Vehicles
    Simplified Tools and Methods for Chassis and Vehicle Dynamics Development for FSAE Vehicles A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the School of Dynamic Systems of the College of Engineering and Applied Science by Fredrick Jabs B.A. University of Cincinnati June 2006 Committee Chair: Randall Allemang, Ph.D. Abstract Chassis and vehicle dynamics development is a demanding discipline within the FSAE team structure. Many fundamental quantities that are key to the vehicle’s behavior are underdeveloped, undefined or not validated during the product lifecycle of the FSAE competition vehicle. Measurements and methods dealing with the yaw inertia, pitch inertia, roll inertia and tire forces of the vehicle were developed to more accurately quantify the vehicle parameter set. An air ride rotational platform was developed to quantify the yaw inertia of the vehicle. Due to the facilities available the air ride approach has advantages over the common trifilar pendulum method. The air ride necessitates the use of an elevated level table while the trifilar requires a large area and sufficient overhead structure to suspend the object. Although the air ride requires more rigorous computation to perform the second order polynomial fitment of the data, use of small angle approximation is avoided during the process. The rigid pendulum developed to measure both the pitch and roll inertia also satisfies the need to quantify the center of gravity location as part of the process. For the size of the objects being measured, cost and complexity were reduced by using wood for the platform, simple steel support structures and a knife edge pivot design.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Reinventing the Wheel Formula SAE Student Chapter California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 2018 Patrick Kragen [email protected] Ahmed Shorab [email protected] Adam Menashe [email protected] Esther Unti [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background – Tire Choice .......................................................................................................... 1 Tire Grip ................................................................................................................................. 1 Mass and Inertia ..................................................................................................................... 3 Transient Response ............................................................................................................... 4 Requirements – Tire Choice ....................................................................................................... 4 Performance ........................................................................................................................... 5 Cost ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Operating Temperature .......................................................................................................... 6 Tire Evaluation ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Simulation to Drive Formula Sae Design Decisions
    VEHICLE SIMULATION TO DRIVE FORMULA SAE DESIGN DECISIONS STEVEN WEBB MONASH UNIVERSITY 2012 SUPERVISED BY DR SCOTT WORDLEY Final Year Project 2012 Final Report SUMMARY This report covers the creation of a simple program that approximates lap time and energy for Formula SAE cars. In 2010 it was decided that Monash Motorsport would do a “clean sheet” design, so the simulation was made in order to find the effect each aspect of the car has on the cars total performance. This report also shows how to correctly validate raw test data against the equations used to create the model in order to improve the accuracy and understanding of the model and to calculate suitable performance metrics for the car. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Goals and Performance Metrics ........................................................................................ 5 1.2 Variations between different Formula events. .................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Scoring...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Track Layout ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Control System for Quarter Car Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension
    Control System for Quarter Car Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension By: D. A. Weeks J.H.Beno D. A. Bresie A. Guenin 1997 SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Ml, Feb 24-27, 1997. PR- 223 Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin PRC, Mail Code R7000 Austin, TX 78712 (512) 471-4496 January 2, 1997 Control System for Single Wheel Station Heavy Tracked Vehicle Active Electromagnetic Suspension D. A. Weeks, J. H. Beno, D. A. Bresie, and A. M. Guenin The Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin PRC, Mail Code R7000 Austin TX 78712 (512) 471-4496 ABSTRACT necessary control forces. The original paper described details concerning system modeling and new active suspension con­ Researchers at The University of Texas Center for trol approaches (briefly summarized in Addendum A for read­ Electromechanics recently completed design, fabrication, and er convenience). This paper focuses on hardware and software preliminary testing of an Electromagnetic Active Suspension implementation, especially electronics, sensors, and signal pro­ System (EMASS). The EMASS program was sponsored by cessing, and on experimental results for a single wheel station the United States Army Tank Automotive and Armaments test-rig. Briefly, the single wheel test-rig (fig. 1) simulated a Command Center (TACOM) and the Defense Advanced single Ml Main Battle Tank roadwheel station at full scale, Research Projects Agency (DARPA). A full scale, single wheel using a 4,500 kg (5 ton) block of concrete for the sprung mass mockup of an M1 tank suspension was chosen for evaluating and actual M1 roadwheels and roadarm for unsprung mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Vehicle Dynamics Tools for Motorsports
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Chris Patton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering presented on February 7, 2013. Title: Development of Vehicle Dynamics Tools for Motorsports. Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________________________________ Robert K. Paasch In this dissertation, a group of vehicle dynamics simulation tools is developed with two primary goals: to accurately represent vehicle behavior and to provide insight that improves the understanding of vehicle performance. Three tools are developed that focus on tire modeling, vehicle modeling and lap time simulation. Tire modeling is based on Nondimensional Tire Theory, which is extended to provide a flexible model structure that allows arbitrary inputs to be included. For example, rim width is incorporated as a continuous variable in addition to vertical load, inclination angle and inflation pressure. Model order is determined statistically and only significant effects are included. The fitting process is shown to provide satisfactory fits while fit parameters clearly demonstrate characteristic behavior of the tire. To represent the behavior of a complete vehicle, a Nondimensional Tire Model is used, along with a three degree of freedom vehicle model, to create Milliken Moment Diagrams (MMD) at different speeds, longitudinal accelerations, and under various yaw rate conditions. In addition to the normal utility of MMDs for understanding vehicle performance, they are used to develop Limit Acceleration Surfaces that represent the longitudinal, lateral and yaw acceleration limits of the vehicle. Quasi-transient lap time simulation is developed that simulates the performance of a vehicle on a predetermined path based on the Limit Acceleration Surfaces described above. The method improves on the quasi-static simulation method by representing yaw dynamics and indicating the vehicle’s stability and controllability over the lap.
    [Show full text]
  • Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design
    Formula SAE Interchangeable Independent Rear Suspension Design Sponsored by the Cal Poly Formula SAE team A Final Report for Reid Olsen, FSAE Technical Director By: Suspension Solutions Design team Mike McCune - [email protected] Daniel Nunes - [email protected] Mike Patton - [email protected] Courtney Richardson - [email protected] Evan Sparer - [email protected] 2009 ME 428/481/470 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 7 FSAE Team History and Opportunity ......................................................................................................... 8 Formal Problem Definition ...................................................................................................................... 10 Objectives/Specification Development ................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: Background ............................................................................................................................... 13 Solid Rear Axle Design ............................................................................................................................. 14 Tire Research ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]