DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CIRCUITEER Issue 43 / July 2017 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit EDITOR’S COLUMN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CIRCUITEER Issue 43 / July 2017 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit EDITOR’S COLUMN News from the South Eastern Circuit THE CIRCUITEER INSIDE THIS ISSUE 7 8 12 14 20 Wellbeing at The Times They Essex Bar Mess Marine A – The Two recent the Bar Are a-changin’ Report Fog of Law dinners for the Circuit THE RECORDERS MEMORY OF CAMBRIDGE TRAP By Judge Tony Bate By Dr. Julia Shaw In the first of a two part article, Judge Tony Bate traces the history of this civic office and its recent Our memories, even revival in Cambridge, our most important where he sat between ones, can be just 2007 and 2013 before an illusion. moving to Norwich. See page 10 See page 16 Has the United States LEADER’S REPORT of America failed international justice by not THE WAY signing up to the TO MAKE International THE CROWN Criminal Court? COURT WORK By Katherine Duncan By Kerim Fuad QC See page 13 See page 3 THE CIRCUITEER Issue 43 / July 2017 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit EDITOR’S COLUMN Karim Khalil QC type this looking out over expended on trying to confront Cambridge. No doubt there are an unusually sunny London and improve the GFS in criminal similarly fascinating pockets Iday as the Pride March brings cases only to find that the of knowledge across the much-needed colour and joy Government surrendered its Circuit, so let no Judge keep to a beleaguered city. This majority position and with their pen dry … seems to chime tunefully with it the Lord Chancellor … we As ever, we extend a very warm the increasing awareness of can only lend our continuing welcome the many recent the importance of tolerance support to those who work appointments and hope that and support for all, as Wellness on our behalves to try and re- the fabulous parties held in at the Bar and elsewhere kindle the discussions, perhaps celebration are matched by is taking central stage for invigorated by the news of the continued success. Thank you professionals and politicians end of austerity: or did I miss to those who have served the alike. A glance across the page mention of lawyers, in the Bar and Bench but who have allows our Circuit Leader to endless calls made for more recently retired, or announced address some of the practical money to be made available in an intention to do so. It really implications of trying to make the public sector?! is a time of huge change on our work places more attuned The arrival of the summer the Bench, as is revealed in to the needs of those without sun heralds the beginning of our article focused upon the whom “the system” will simply the big Charitable season – in roll-call of Bailey Judges who collapse: hopefully the recent addition to the increasing are finding pastures new … it Bar Protocol on Sitting Hours hours of pro bono work that will surely not be long before will be a welcome step in we undertake, many are giving another Inquiry is headed up by that direction. of their “leisure/free” time to one of their number? The ambitious roll-out of the try and make the world better Have a wonderful summer; Bar-wide training in relation to for the less advantaged. So don’t forget to make the most the treatment of ‘vulnerable many initiatives are supported of our ability to travel to the EU witnesses’ has placed a by the Bar that one is almost without needing a Visa; return huge strain on many who are bound to cause upset by failing refreshed and looking forward already involved in the most to mention them all, so please to an Autumn full of promise difficult work. The details of let us know about any special – or at least another edition of the local implementation of events so that they can be The Circuiteer! the arrangements for Section included in the next edition. 28 Hearings and the related Meanwhile, the annual Legal Many thanks to all who have litigation will be critical to Walk has already raised much contributed to this edition, the success of the statutory for many fine causes; the Legal with special thanks to my initiatives – we rely on Garden Party in Middle Temple sub-editor, Adam Morgan, and members of the Bar Messes provided a fun and sociable the indefatigable Aaron Dolan to be vigilant in ensuring conduit for some spare pennies who manages to ‘persuade’ so that the good intentions of and the Prudential London100 many to help The Circuiteer this initiative do not become cycle at the end of July will do and the S.E Circuit. Sam so burdensome that fine likewise – feel free to witness Sullivan has surpassed himself practitioners abandon this the pain of many members of in continuing to prepare the work: may I venture to Drystone Chambers as we aim edition with his colourful eye suggest that the relations with to improve on the £17,000 we and quiet patience in the face implementing Judges have raised last year. of my editorial delays. never been more important. The request for Judicial Now, back onto the Once again the publicly funded contributions continues turbo trainer for another Karim Khalil QC sections of our profession are to be well supported – we few hours of “virtual facing political uncertainty reveal part 1 of an historical cycling” glory – Prudential Drystone Chambers – so much effort had been view of the Recorders of London100 here I come! Editor The Circuiteer If you wish to contribute any material to the next issue of The Circuiteer, please contact: [email protected] 2 LEADER’S REPORT THE WAY TO MAKE THE CROWN COURT WORK by Kerim Fuad QC, LEADER OF THE SOUTH EASTERN CIRCUIT Kerim Fuad QC 1. Enforce deadlines of the conference with the defendant, either in learn that a prisoner “has been moved to person or on PVL, before the hearing. I am a different prison.” Simple communication service of papers told, and have often experienced first- is all that is needed by the prison. The For the criminal justice system to work hand, that the waiting times for booking prison must have the solicitors firms’ and efficiently, the CPS must serve the case conferences at some prisons are up to 3/4 barristers’ contact details on the system. weeks’ long (Eg HMP Pentonville). This papers on time, which must include a (d) Poaching properly drafted indictment. Judges must is of crucial importance considering the enforce this robustly. If not, then it simply issue of credit for pleas. Many solicitors have expressed their concerns as to the increasing amount cannot practically work, as advocates There is also the very real practical of applications to transfer legal aid. will be operating under unworkable problem of the need for an advocate There are reports that some firms are timelines. Solicitors simply do not have to get a written endorsement from actively poaching clients, even offering the resources at their disposal to waste a defendant of their desire to plead young clients something as simple as valuable time chasing papers or reacting guilty, which cannot be done unless the new trainers in return for the transfer. to the last minute service of papers. defendant is there in person. They do not understand why, in this 2. Papers must PVLs are often limited to 15 minutes. This modern age, prisons don’t have the is often not enough time for an effective existing representation order available be sent to the conference, especially when the matter on their computer system so that only instructed advocate asap is complex or the defendant has mental the firm who is shown on record is health difficulties. allowed access. Once served upon the solicitors, the papers must be sent to the advocate who It is obviously far easier for an advocate (e) The process for allowing advocates’ will have responsibility of defending the to obtain the trust of a defendant, provide laptops into prison must be made easy case. Equally the CPS must send papers the robust advice often needed, and and nationwide. There must be adequate to instructed counsel. This should be persuade them effectively to consider a facilities for defendants to be able to see now much easier as the case is simply guilty plea if the conference is face-to- evidence electronically in prison. uploaded onto DCS. face in the same room. 4. Proper service of The advocates must be invited onto the (b) Priority processing of advocates’ visits Digital Case System there and then. over social visits at all prisons paginated and full bundle The CPS and defence solicitors must Prison governors should ensure that, The current payment scheme is based make the decision whether to instruct when both “legals” and “socials” arrive for almost exclusively on a page count. counsel, and electronically send them the prison visits, “the legals” are processed We know that this will soon change. papers in good time before the hearing, FIRST to ensure that they have maximum We await the government’s response and preferably as soon as the CPS serve time with the client. At present, at HMP to the consultation response. However, the papers on the solicitors. Belmarsh prison, an advocate always has for now, we are stuck with it. So in the to wait some time for “the socials” to be meantime, to incentivise advocates, a 3. Conferences: reasonable processed first by which time the slot proper and full page count (statements allowed for your conference can go down and exhibits) should be served before or time for conference to as little as 20 minutes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Padfield Wonders Aloud (Do Contact Me on [email protected])
    University of Leeds Centre for Criminal Justice Studies Justice in the Criminal Courts in the 21st Century What are criminal courts for? Nicky Padfield wonders aloud (do contact me on [email protected]) VERY VERY DRAFT Introduction I am taking the opportunity as the first speaker at this conference to raise some big and/or broad questions. The paper is not as developed as I would like: I shall dig more into history, theory, law and practice in due course. But, in essence, my argument is that this big picture allows us to remember important principles. Many of the speakers who follow will focus on individual aspects of the trial process, often presenting original empirical research. Here I go back to basics. What is a trial? A public process which compels defendants to answer a charge of criminal wrongdoing. The outcome is often a serious sanction. Obviously, trials have to be fair. That does not simply mean they should not be unfair. Should we focus on ways in which public courts can promote fairness and justice, and indeed social cohesion? Swift justice has merits, but does not necessarily achieve just outcomes. Non-public ‗diversion‘ is equally dangerous. I will briefly raise some of the criminological literature on compliance, legitimacy and desistance – but speak up also for human rights and the rule of law - a big agenda! History For the purpose of this paper, I took as my starting point a series of riot trials, at three different moments in English history. Serendipitously, when the riots of 2011 were still recent, I happened upon a book called the Report of the Trials for Rioting at Ely and Littleport, 1816 (Warren, ed, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Castle: the Rebuilding of the County Gaol and Courts
    Contrebis 2019 v37 LANCASTER CASTLE: THE REBUILDING OF THE COUNTY GAOL AND COURTS John Champness Abstract This paper details the building and rebuilding of Lancaster Castle in the late-eighteenth and early- nineteenth centuries to expand and improve the prison facilities there. Most of the present buildings in the Castle date from a major scheme of extending the County Gaol, undertaken in the last years of the eighteenth century. The principal architect was Thomas Harrison, who had come to Lancaster in 1782 after winning the competition to design Skerton Bridge (Champness 2005, 16). The scheme arose from concern about the unsatisfactory state of the Gaol which was largely unchanged from the medieval Castle (Figure 1). Figure 1. Plan of Lancaster Castle taken from Mackreth’s map of Lancaster, 1778 People had good reasons for their concern, because life in Georgian gaols was somewhat disorganised. The major reason lay in how the role of gaols had been expanded over the years in response to changing pressures. County gaols had originally been established in the Middle Ages to provide short-term accommodation for only two groups of people – those awaiting trial at the twice- yearly Assizes, and convicted criminals who were waiting for their sentences to be carried out, by hanging or transportation to an overseas colony. From the late-seventeenth century, these people were joined by debtors. These were men and women with cash-flow problems, who could avoid formal bankruptcy by forfeiting their freedom until their finances improved. During the mid- eighteenth century, numbers were further increased by the imprisonment of ‘felons’, that is, convicted criminals who had not been sentenced to death, but could not be punished in a local prison or transported.
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire County Record Office
    WARWICKSHIRE COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Priory Park Cape Road Warwick CV34 4JS Tel: (01926) 738959 Email: [email protected] Website: http://heritage.warwickshire.gov.uk/warwickshire-county-record-office Please note we are closed to the public during the first full week of every calendar month to enable staff to catalogue collections. A full list of these collection weeks is available on request and also on our website. The reduction in our core funding means we can no longer produce documents between 12.00 and 14.15 although the searchroom will remain open during this time. There is no need to book an appointment, but entry is by CARN ticket so please bring proof of name, address and signature (e.g. driving licence or a combination of other documents) if you do not already have a ticket. There is a small car park with a dropping off zone and disabled spaces. Please telephone us if you would like to reserve a space or discuss your needs in any detail. Last orders: Documents/Photocopies 30 minutes before closing. Transportation to Australia and Tasmania Transportation to Australia began in 1787 with the sailing of the “First Fleet” of convicts and their arrival at Botany Bay in January 1788. The practice continued in New South Wales until 1840, in Van Dieman’s Land (Tasmania) until 1853 and in Western Australia until 1868. Most of the convicts were tried at the Assizes, The Court of the Assize The Assizes dealt with all cases where the defendant was liable to be sentenced to death (nearly always commuted to transportation for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Legal Aid: Next Steps
    TRANSFORMING LEGAL AID: NEXT STEPS (CP ....../2013) CONSULTATION RESPONSE BY TREASURY COUNSEL TO THE CROWN AT THE CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT st 31 October 2013 1 OVERVIEW By this Consultation Paper, Transforming Legal Aid: Next Steps, H.M. Government has indicated that it rejects or can ignore much of the content of the thousands of Consultation Responses to its April Paper CP14/2013, particularly as to the future effect on the supply and quality of criminal advocacy services from the proposed changes to legal aid funding. Instead, this second stage: Treats as settled the principle of massive (30%) reductions to VHCC fees, but from a mistaken base and with no good policy justification; Seeks only to consult on the mechanism for introducing further big reductions in fees for Crown Court advocacy (the AGFS changes); Assumes that these changes will have no effect on the provision of advocacy services; and At the same time, suggests that those effects are unquantifiable and so invites consultee assistance as to their impact. The Treasury Counsel team at the Old Bailey considers that: (1) These proposals come as publicly funded fees for criminal advocacy are in the middle of a very steep, downward trajectory (25% savings over 4 years and continuing), the end point and consequences of which are neither complete nor known or understood by policymakers; (2) The current commercial state of the criminal Bar is precarious, as a result of previous policy implementation, so that even small changes in income will now have very significant effects;
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Administrative Law 1
    CP Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD PRINCIPLES OF LAW SERIES Professor Paul Dobson Visiting Professor at Anglia Polytechnic University Professor Nigel Gravells Professor of English Law, Nottingham University Professor Phillip Kenny Professor and Head of the Law School, Northumbria University Professor Richard Kidner Professor and Head of the Law Department, University of Wales, Aberystwyth In order to ensure that the material presented by each title maintains the necessary balance between thoroughness in content and accessibility in arrangement, each title in the series has been read and approved by an independent specialist under the aegis of the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board oversees the development of the series as a whole, ensuring a conformity in all these vital aspects. David Stott, LLB, LLM Deputy Head, Anglia Law School Anglia Polytechnic University Alexandra Felix, LLB, LLM Lecturer in Law, Anglia Law School Anglia Polytechnic University CP Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney First published in Great Britain 1997 by Cavendish Publishing Limited, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London WC1X 9PX. Telephone: 0171-278 8000 Facsimile: 0171-278 8080 e-mail: [email protected] Visit our Home Page on http://www.cavendishpublishing.com © Stott, D and Felix, A 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE, UK, without the permission in writing of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials the CD Has Photographs of Almost 90% of the Memorials Plus Information on Their Current Location
    PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials The CD has photographs of almost 90% of the memorials plus information on their current location. The Memorials - listed in their pre-1970 counties: Cambridgeshire: Benwick; Coates; Stanground –Church & Lampass Lodge of Oddfellows; Thorney, Turves; Whittlesey; 1st/2nd Battalions. Cambridgeshire Regiment Huntingdonshire: Elton; Farcet; Fletton-Church, Ex-Servicemen Club, Phorpres Club, (New F) Baptist Chapel, (Old F) United Methodist Chapel; Gt Stukeley; Huntingdon-All Saints & County Police Force, Kings Ripton, Lt Stukeley, Orton Longueville, Orton Waterville, Stilton, Upwood with Gt Ravely, Waternewton, Woodston, Yaxley Lincolnshire: Barholm; Baston; Braceborough; Crowland (x2); Deeping St James; Greatford; Langtoft; Market Deeping; Tallington; Uffington; West Deeping: Wilsthorpe; Northamptonshire: Barnwell; Collyweston; Easton on the Hill; Fotheringhay; Lutton; Tansor; Yarwell City of Peterborough: Albert Place Boys School; All Saints; Baker Perkins, Broadway Cemetery; Boer War; Book of Remembrance; Boy Scouts; Central Park (Our Jimmy); Co-op; Deacon School; Eastfield Cemetery; General Post Office; Hand & Heart Public House; Jedburghs; King’s School: Longthorpe; Memorial Hospital (Roll of Honour); Museum; Newark; Park Rd Chapel; Paston; St Barnabas; St John the Baptist (Church & Boys School); St Mark’s; St Mary’s; St Paul’s; St Peter’s College; Salvation Army; Special Constabulary; Wentworth St Chapel; Werrington; Westgate Chapel Soke of Peterborough: Bainton with Ashton; Barnack; Castor; Etton; Eye; Glinton; Helpston; Marholm; Maxey with Deeping Gate; Newborough with Borough Fen; Northborough; Peakirk; Thornhaugh; Ufford; Wittering. Pearl Assurance National Memorial (relocated from London to Lynch Wood, Peterborough) Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough (£10) This CD contains a record and index of all the readable gravestones in the Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform in England
    Comments COURT REFORM IN ENGLAND A reading of the Beeching report' suggests that the English court reform which entered into force on 1 January 1972 was the result of purely domestic considerations. The members of the Commission make no reference to the civil law countries which Great Britain will join in an important economic and political regional arrangement. Yet even a cursory examination of the effects of the reform on the administration of justice in England and Wales suggests that English courts now resemble more closely their counterparts in Western Eu- rope. It should be stated at the outset that the new organization of Eng- lish courts is by no means the result of the 1971 Act alone. The Act crowned the work of various legislative measures which have brought gradual change for a period of well over a century, including the Judicature Acts 1873-75, the Interpretation Act 1889, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, the Administration of Justice Act 1933, the County Courts Act 1934, the Criminal Appeal Act 1966 and the Criminal Law Act 1967. The reform culminates a prolonged process of response to social change affecting the legal structure in England. Its effect was to divorce the organization of the courts from tradition and history in order to achieve efficiency and to adapt the courts to new tasks and duties which they must meet in new social and economic conditions. While the earlier acts, including the 1966 Criminal Appeal Act, modernized the structure of the Supreme Court of Judicature, the 1971 Act extended modern court structure to the intermediate level, creating the new Crown Court, and provided for the regular admin- istration of justice in civil matters by the High Court in England and Wales, outside the Royal Courts in London.
    [Show full text]
  • CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007
    CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007 Promoting Improvement in Criminal Justice HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007 Promoting Improvement in Criminal Justice HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Report 2007 ABBREVIATIONS Common abbreviations used in this report are set out below. Local abbreviations are explained in the report. ABM Area Business Manager HMCPSI Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate ABP Area Business Plan JDA Judge Directed Acquittal AEI Area Effectiveness Inspection JOA Judge Ordered Acquittal ASBO Anti-Social Behaviour Order JPM Joint Performance Monitoring BCU Basic Command Unit or Borough Command Unit LCJB Local Criminal Justice Board BME Black and Minority Ethnic MAPPA Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements CCP Chief Crown Prosecutor MG3 Form on which a record of the CJA Criminal Justice Area charging decision is made CJS Criminal Justice System NCTA No Case to Answer CJSSS Criminal Justice: Simple, Speedy, NRFAC Non Ring-Fenced Administrative Summary Costs CJU Criminal Justice Unit NWNJ No Witness No Justice CMS Case Management System OBTJ Offences Brought to Justice CPIA Criminal Procedure and OPA Overall Performance Assessment Investigations Act PCD Pre-Charge Decision CPO Case Progression Officer PCMH Plea and Case Management Hearing CPS Crown Prosecution Service POCA Proceeds of Crime Act CPSD CPS Direct PTPM Prosecution Team Performance CQA Casework
    [Show full text]
  • A Veritable Revolution: the Court of Criminal Appeal in English
    A VERITABLE REVOLUTION: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL IN ENGLISH CRIMINAL HISTORY 1908-1958 A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by CECILE ARDEN PHILLIPS B.A. University of Missouri-Kansas City, 1986 Kansas City, Missouri 2012 © 2012 CECILE ARDEN PHILLIPS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A VERITABLE REVOLUTION: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL IN ENGLISH CRIMINAL HISTORY 1908-1958 Cecile Arden Phillips, Candidate for the Masters of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2012 ABSTRACT In a historic speech to the House of Commons on April 17, 1907, British Attorney General, John Lawson Walton, proposed the formation of what was to be the first court of criminal appeal in English history. Such a court had been debated, but ultimately rejected, by successive governments for over half a century. In each debate, members of the judiciary declared that a court for appeals in criminal cases held the potential of destroying the world-respected English judicial system. The 1907 debates were no less contentious, but the newly elected Liberal government saw social reform, including judicial reform, as their highest priority. After much compromise and some of the most overwrought speeches in the history of Parliament, the Court of Criminal Appeal was created in August 1907 and began hearing cases in May 1908. A Veritable Revolution is a social history of the Court’s first fifty years. There is no doubt, that John Walton and the other founders of the Court of Criminal Appeal intended it to provide protection from the miscarriage of justice for English citizens convicted of criminal offenses.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Literature on the Relation Between Drug Use, Impaired Driving and Traffic Accidents
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre on Drug Use E.M.C.D.D.A. DRUGS MISUSE RESEARCH DIVISION HEALTH RESEARCH BOARD An Inventory of Literature on the Relation between Drug Use, Impaired Driving and Traffic Accidents CT.97.EP.14 Research Team: Colin Gemmell Trinity College, Dublin Rosalyn Moran Drugs Misuse Research Division, Health Research Board James Crowley Professor, Transport Policy Research Institute, University College Dublin Richeal Courtney Medical Expert, for the Health Research Board EMCDDA: Lucas Wiessing February 1999 Please use the following citation: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. An Inventory of Literature on the Relation betweenDrug Use, Impaired Driving and Traffic Accidents. (CT.97.EP.14) Lisbon: EMCDDA, February 1999. Contact Details Drugs Misuse Research Division Health Research Board 73 Lower Baggot Street Dublin 2 Ireland European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction Rua Cruz de Santa Apolónia 23/25 1100, Lisboa Portugal. Further copies of this bibliography can be obtained from the EMCDDA at the above address. CREDITS Principal Researchers Ms Rosalyn Moran, Project Leader, Health Research Board Professor James Crowley, Professor, Transport Policy Research Institute, UCD Dr Richeal Courtney, Medical Expert, on behalf of the Health Research Board Research Assistants Colin Gemmell (Synthesis and Final Reports) Sarah Heywood (Literature Search and Collaborative Network) For the EMCDDA Lucas Wiessing
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Salaries
    MINISTRY0B OF JUSTICE JUDICIAL1B SALARIES FROM 1 APRIL 2013 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. 01/04/11 01/04/12 01/04/13 Group 1 239,845 239,845 242,243 Lord Chief Justice Group 1.1 214,165 214,165 216,307 Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Lord President of the Court of Session Master of the Rolls President of the Supreme Court Group 2 206,857 206,857 208,926 Chancellor of the High Court Deputy President of the Supreme Court Justices of the Supreme Court Lord Justice Clerk President of the Family Division President of the Queen’s Bench Division Senior President of Tribunals (Transitional pay) (201,613) (203,643) (207,730) Group3B 3 196,707 196,707 198,674 Inner House Judges of the Court of Session Lords Justices of Appeal Lords Justices of Appeal (N I) Group4B 4 172,753 172,753 174,481 High Court Judges [Note A] Outer House Judges of the Court of Session Puisne Judges (N I) Vice-Chancellor of the County Palatine of Lancaster Former Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator, Asylum 146,668 146,668 148,135 Support Tribunal (now judge of the First-tier Tribunal, Social Entitlement Chamber, and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal) Group 5 138,548 138,548 139,933 Chairman, Scottish Land Court President of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal [Note L] Chief Social Security Commissioner (N I) 1 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Body on Senior Salaries Cm 8026
    Review Body on Senior Salaries Review Body on Senior Salaries – REPORT No. 77 2011 REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, telephone, fax and email TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/general enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 Email: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/general enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other accredited agents Cm 8026 £20.50 Customers can also order publications from: .. TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 RBSS_2011_cover.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2011 Cm 8026 £20.50 RBSS_2011.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government­ licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]