DOCSLIB.ORG

[email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request-347575-9D642004@Whatdotheyknow.Com Briefing and Business Estates Directorate 4th Floor, 102 Petty France LONDON SW1H 9AJ 020 3334 2632 E [email protected] Pat James C/o: [email protected] Our ref: FOI/106672 18 August 2016 Dear Mr James Thank you for your email of 23 July, in which you asked for the following information from the Ministry of Justice (MOJ): “All relevant recorded documentation of the locations within the United Kingdom where G4S provide 'Court Security Officer' services to HMCTS”. Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). I can confirm that the MOJ holds the information you requested and I am pleased to provide this to you by way of the attached annex. You can also find more information by reading the full text of the FOIA, available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/contents). You have the right to appeal this decision if you think it is incorrect or if your request has been handled incorrectly. Details can be found in the ‘How to Appeal’ section attached to this letter. Disclosure Log You can also view information that the MOJ has disclosed in response to previous FOI requests. Responses are anonymised and published on our on-line disclosure log which can be found on the MoJ website: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of- justice/series/freedom-of-information-disclosure-log Yours sincerely Signed by Darren Fearnley Annex HMCTS sites where security is provided by G4S Building Name Address Aberdeen Tribunal Atholl House, 84-86 Guild Street, Aberdeen Aberystwyth Justice Centre Y Lanfa, Aberystwyth, SY23 1AS Accrington County Court Bradshawgate House, 1 Oak Street, Accrington, Lancashire Accrington Magistrates Court The Law Courts, Manchester Road, Accrington, Lancashire Alexandra House 14-22 The Parsonage Barnsley Magistrates Court The Court House, Westgate, BARNSLEY Barrow Magistrates & County Abbey Road, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria Bennett House Town Road Hanley, Stoke Berwick-Upon-Tweed Magistrates Court 40 Church Street, BERWICK UPON TWEED Bingley Magistrates Court / Keighley The Court House, Bradford Road, Magistrates Court BINGLEY Birkenhead County Court 76 Hamilton Street, Birkenhead Birmingham Civil Justice Centre The Priory Courts, 33 Bull Street, Birmingham Birmingham Crown Court 1 Newton Street, Birmingham Birmingham Crown Court Annex 4 Newton Street, Birmingham Birmingham Magistrates' Court Victoria Law Courts, Corporation Street, Birmingham Birmingham Magistrates' Youth Court 52-56 Newton Street, Birmingham Blackburn County Court 64 Victoria Street, Blackburn, Lancashire Blackburn Magistrates The Court House, Northgate, Blackburn, Lancashire Blackpool County Court The Law Courts, Chapel St, Blackpool, Lancashire Blackpool Magistrates Court Civic Centre, Chapel St, Blackpool, Lancashire Blackwood Civil & Family 8 Hall Street, Blackwood Bolton Combined Court The Law Courts, Blackhorse Street, Bolton, Lancashire Bolton Magistrates Court The Courts, Civic Centre, Le Mans Crescent, Bolton Building Name Address Bootle Magistrates Court 29 Merton Road, Bootle Boston Court Centre 55 Norfolk Street, Boston Bradford Law Courts Exchange Square, Drake Street, BRADFORD Bradford Magistrates Court The Tyrls, BRADFORD Brecon Law Courts Cambrian Way, Brecon Bridgend Law Courts Sunnyside Road, Bridgend Burnley Combined Court The Law Courts, Hammerton Street, Burnley, Lancashire Burnley Magistrates Court The Court House, Parker Lane, Burnley, Lancashire Burton-upon-Trent Magistrates' Court The Court House, Horninglow Street, Burton upon Trent Bury Courthouse The Court House, Tenters Street, Bury Buxton Court Centre Peak Buildings, Terrace Road, Buxton Caernarfon County Court Llanberis Road, Caernarfon Caernarfon Criminal Justice Centre Llanberis Road, Caernarfon Caerphilly Magistrates Court Mountain Road, Caerphilly Cannock and Seisdon Magistrates' Court The Court House, Wolverhampton Road, Cannock Cardiff Civil Justice Centre 2 Park Street, Cardiff Cardiff Crown Court Cathays Park, Cardiff Cardiff Magistrates Court Fitzalan Place, Cardiff Carlisle Combined Court Courts of Justice, Earl Street, Carlisle Carlisle Magistrates Court Rickergate, Carlisle, Cumbria Carmarthen Guildhall Law Courts The Guildhall, Guildhall Square, Carmarthen Carmarthen Hearing Centre Hill House, Picton Terrace, Carmarthen Centre City Tower Centre City Tower; 5-7 Hill Street, Birmingham, B5 4UU Chester Civil Justice Centre Trident House, Little St. John Street, Chester Chester Crown Court The Castle, Chester Chester Magistrates Court Grosvenor Street, Chester Chester-Le-Street Magistrates Court Newcastle Road, CHESTER LE STREET Chorley Magistrates Court The Court House, St. Thomas Square, Chorley, Lancashire Building Name Address City Exchange (4th Floor) 11 Albion Street, LEEDS Columbus House Langstone Business Park, Chepstowe Road, Newport Consett Magistrates Court Ashdale Road, CONSETT Corby Magistrates' Court Elizabeth Street, Corby County Court Money Claims Centre Prince William House, Peel Cross Road, Salford Coventry Combined Court 140 Much Park Street, Coventry Coventry Magistrates' Court Little Park Street, Coventry Crewe Courthouse The Law Courts, Civic Centre, Crewe Cwmbran Magistrates Court Tudor Road, Cwmbran Darlington County Court 5 Coniscliffe Road, DARLINGTON Darlington Magistrates Court Parkgate, DARLINGTON Derby Combined Court The Morledge, Derby Dolgellau Magistrates Court The Court House, Bridge Street, Dolgellau Doncaster County Court 74 Waterdale, DONCASTER Doncaster Crown Court College Road, DONCASTER Doncaster Magistrates Court PO Box 49, The Law Courts, College Road, DONCASTER Dudley Magistrates' Court The Inhedge, Dudley Dundee Tribunal Caledonian House, Greenmarket, Dundee Durham Civil and Family Justice Centre Old Elvet, DURHAM Durham Crown Court The Law Courts, Old Elvet, DURHAM East Parade 14 East Parade, York Street, Sheffield Fleetwood Family Hearing Centre The Esplande, Fleetwood, Lancashire Gateshead Law Courts PO BOX 26 Warwick Street, GATESHEAD Grantham Court Centre Harlaxton Road, Grantham Great Grimsby Combined Court Centre Town Hall Square, GRIMSBY Grimsby Magistrates Court Victoria Street, GRIMSBY Building Name Address Halifax County Court Prescott Street, HALIFAX Halifax Magistrates Court (Calderdale) PO Box 32, Harrison Road, HALIFAX Harrogate Magistrates Court The Court House, Victoria Avenue, HARROGATE Hartlepool County Court The Law Courts, Victoria Road, HARTLEPOOL Hartlepool Magistrates Court The Law Courts, Victoria Road, HARTLEPOOL Haverfordwest Magistrates & County Courts Penffynnon, Hawthorn Rise, Haverfordwest Hereford Crown Court Shire Hall, St Peter's Square, Hereford Hinckley Magistrates' Court Upper Bond Street, Hinckley Holyhead Magistrates Court Stanley Street, Holyhead Huddersfield County Court Queensgate House, Queensgate, HUDDERSFIELD Huddersfield Magistrates Court The Court House, Civic Centre, High Street, HUDDERSFIELD Kendal Courthouse The Courthouse, Burneside Road, Kendal, Cumbria Kettering County Court Dryland Street, Kettering Kettering Magistrates' Court London Road, Kettering Kings Court - Leicester 5a New Walk, Leicester Kings Court - NE Earl Grey Way, NORTH SHIELDS Kingston Upon Hull Combined Court Lowgate, HULL Lancaster County Court 2nd Floor Mitre House, Church Street, Lancaster, Lancashire Lancaster Crown Court The Castle, Lancaster Lancaster Magistrates Court George Street, Lancaster, Lancashire Leeds Civil Hearing Centre Coverdale House, 13-15 East Parade, LEEDS Leeds Combined Court The Court House, 1 Oxford Row, LEEDS Leeds Magistrates Court The Court Office, PO Box No 97, Westgate, LEEDS Leicester Crown & County Court Wellington Street, Leicester Leicester Magistrates' Court Pocklingtons Walk, Leicester Leyland Family Hearing Centre Lancastergate, Leyland, Lancashire Lincoln County Court 360 High Street, Lincoln Lincoln Crown Court The Castle, Castle Hill, Lincoln Building Name Address Lincoln Magistrates' Court 358 High Street, Lincoln Liverpool Civil & Family Court 35 Vernon Street, Liverpool Liverpool Magistrates Court (Dale) 107 Dale Street, Liverpool Liverpool QE2 Crown Court The Law Courts, Derby Square, Liverpool Llandrindod Wells Justice centre Noyadd Parks LLandridod Wells Powys LD1 5DF Llandudno Magistrates Court Conwy Road, Llandudno Llanelli Magistrates & County Court Court Buildings, Town Hall Square, Llanelli Llangefni County Court County Court Buildings, Glanhwfa Road, Llangefni Loughborough Magistrates' Court 60 Pinfold Gate, Loughborough Macclesfield County Court 2nd Floor, Silk House, Park Green, Macclesfield Macclesfield Magistrates Court The Law Courts, Hibel Road, Macclesfield Manchester Civil Justice Centre 1 Bridge Street West, Manchester Manchester Crown Court (Crown Square) Crown Square, Manchester Manchester Crown Court (Minshull Street) Minshull Street, Manchester Mansfield Magistrates' Court Rosemary Street, Mansfield Merthyr Law Courts Glebeland Place, Merthyr Tydfill Mold Magistrates, County & Crown Court The Law Courts, Civic Centre, Mold Morpeth County Court Fountain House, Newmarket, MORPETH Neath & Port Talbot County Court Foster Road, Neath Newcastle Upon Tyne Combined Court The Law Courts, Quayside, NEWCASTLE Newcastle Upon Tyne Crown Courts The Moot Hall, NEWCASTLE Newcastle Upon Tyne Magistrates Court PO Box 839, Market Street, (Market Street) NEWCASTLE Building Name Address Newport County Court - Clarence House The Concourse, Clarence House, Clarence Park, Newport Newport Crown Court The Law Courts, Faulkner Road, Newport Newport Magistrates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lancaster Castle: the Rebuilding of the County Gaol and Courts
    Contrebis 2019 v37 LANCASTER CASTLE: THE REBUILDING OF THE COUNTY GAOL AND COURTS John Champness Abstract This paper details the building and rebuilding of Lancaster Castle in the late-eighteenth and early- nineteenth centuries to expand and improve the prison facilities there. Most of the present buildings in the Castle date from a major scheme of extending the County Gaol, undertaken in the last years of the eighteenth century. The principal architect was Thomas Harrison, who had come to Lancaster in 1782 after winning the competition to design Skerton Bridge (Champness 2005, 16). The scheme arose from concern about the unsatisfactory state of the Gaol which was largely unchanged from the medieval Castle (Figure 1). Figure 1. Plan of Lancaster Castle taken from Mackreth’s map of Lancaster, 1778 People had good reasons for their concern, because life in Georgian gaols was somewhat disorganised. The major reason lay in how the role of gaols had been expanded over the years in response to changing pressures. County gaols had originally been established in the Middle Ages to provide short-term accommodation for only two groups of people – those awaiting trial at the twice- yearly Assizes, and convicted criminals who were waiting for their sentences to be carried out, by hanging or transportation to an overseas colony. From the late-seventeenth century, these people were joined by debtors. These were men and women with cash-flow problems, who could avoid formal bankruptcy by forfeiting their freedom until their finances improved. During the mid- eighteenth century, numbers were further increased by the imprisonment of ‘felons’, that is, convicted criminals who had not been sentenced to death, but could not be punished in a local prison or transported.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform in England
    Comments COURT REFORM IN ENGLAND A reading of the Beeching report' suggests that the English court reform which entered into force on 1 January 1972 was the result of purely domestic considerations. The members of the Commission make no reference to the civil law countries which Great Britain will join in an important economic and political regional arrangement. Yet even a cursory examination of the effects of the reform on the administration of justice in England and Wales suggests that English courts now resemble more closely their counterparts in Western Eu- rope. It should be stated at the outset that the new organization of Eng- lish courts is by no means the result of the 1971 Act alone. The Act crowned the work of various legislative measures which have brought gradual change for a period of well over a century, including the Judicature Acts 1873-75, the Interpretation Act 1889, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, the Administration of Justice Act 1933, the County Courts Act 1934, the Criminal Appeal Act 1966 and the Criminal Law Act 1967. The reform culminates a prolonged process of response to social change affecting the legal structure in England. Its effect was to divorce the organization of the courts from tradition and history in order to achieve efficiency and to adapt the courts to new tasks and duties which they must meet in new social and economic conditions. While the earlier acts, including the 1966 Criminal Appeal Act, modernized the structure of the Supreme Court of Judicature, the 1971 Act extended modern court structure to the intermediate level, creating the new Crown Court, and provided for the regular admin- istration of justice in civil matters by the High Court in England and Wales, outside the Royal Courts in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Recorder of Cardiff
    CARDIFF COUNCIL CYNGOR CAERDYDD COUNCIL: 24 JANUARY 2008 AGENDA ITEM REPORT OF THE CLERK TO THE COUNCIL RECORDER OF CARDIFF Reason for this Report 1. An invitation has been received from the Deputy Head of the Judicial Human Resources Division of the Ministry of Justice to follow past custom and practice in such matters and award the honorary title of Recorder of Cardiff to His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC who holds the appointment of Senior Circuit Judge and Resident Judge at Cardiff Crown Court. Background 2. The appointment of His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC as Senior Circuit Judge and Resident Judge at Cardiff Crown Court was made on the 25 th September 2007 following a competition run by the Judicial Appointments Commission. 3. Judge Cooke was called to the Bar in 1977 and took Silk in 1998. He was appointed Recorder on the Wales Circuit in 1997 and as a Legal Member of the Mental Health Tribunal Restricted Patients Panel in 1999. 4. The Recordership of Cardiff is an ancient office and is mentioned in text as long ago as 1570. There are many more references in old Cardiff City Council minutes from the late 19 th Century until recently. The last appointment was made in 2001. 5. The Recorder of Cardiff is traditionally invited to the Annual Meeting of the Council and certain other of the more ceremonial Council occasions. Issues 5. In so far as the Council has power to award the appointment this would be a matter for Council. Although the award of such title has been long made in Cardiff, the current legal authority to make such an appointment is unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007
    CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007 Promoting Improvement in Criminal Justice HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Undertaken August 2007 Promoting Improvement in Criminal Justice HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate CPS Sussex Overall Performance Assessment Report 2007 ABBREVIATIONS Common abbreviations used in this report are set out below. Local abbreviations are explained in the report. ABM Area Business Manager HMCPSI Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate ABP Area Business Plan JDA Judge Directed Acquittal AEI Area Effectiveness Inspection JOA Judge Ordered Acquittal ASBO Anti-Social Behaviour Order JPM Joint Performance Monitoring BCU Basic Command Unit or Borough Command Unit LCJB Local Criminal Justice Board BME Black and Minority Ethnic MAPPA Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements CCP Chief Crown Prosecutor MG3 Form on which a record of the CJA Criminal Justice Area charging decision is made CJS Criminal Justice System NCTA No Case to Answer CJSSS Criminal Justice: Simple, Speedy, NRFAC Non Ring-Fenced Administrative Summary Costs CJU Criminal Justice Unit NWNJ No Witness No Justice CMS Case Management System OBTJ Offences Brought to Justice CPIA Criminal Procedure and OPA Overall Performance Assessment Investigations Act PCD Pre-Charge Decision CPO Case Progression Officer PCMH Plea and Case Management Hearing CPS Crown Prosecution Service POCA Proceeds of Crime Act CPSD CPS Direct PTPM Prosecution Team Performance CQA Casework
    [Show full text]
  • South Wales Police: Register of Gifts, Gratuities and Hospitality, 2016/17
    South Wales Police: Register of Gifts, Gratuities and Hospitality, 2016/17 Terms of Reference: The following information is published to provide our communities with summaries of offers of Gifts, Gratuities or Hospitality made to South Wales Police (SWP) personnel during the period. All submissions are subject of robust, multi-stage scrutiny and are tracked and reported upon monthly by the Professional Standards Department (PSD). 1. The PSD will publish the outcomes of the submissions during the year, sorted by relevant categories. 2. Redactions have only occurred where an individual member of the public, not acting on the behalf of a company or organisation, were named. Officers Ref. BCU Role Nature Description Value Donor Circumstances Status Name 1. Hilary Morse Eastern Hate Crime Gift Bouquet of flowers to the value of approximately £20. Offered as a gesture of thanks by a member of the public for services provided by SWP. Accepted BCU Officer 2. R. Paines Eastern Constable - Other Cultural visit to Auschwitz Concentration Camp An offer has been made to the C&P dept. to take the Community Cohesion Officer on their annual trip to the Accepted Community Auschwitz concentration camp and memorial. This trip is to raise awareness and promote the profile of the Cohesion Holocaust remembrance. It will enhance our standing within the community and seek to promote cultural ties and Officer is entirely within the spirit of community engagement. Previously the Jewish CST have taken local politicians and on a previous occasion DCC Jukes attended along with the Eastern Hate Officer. The cost of the trip (airfare and accommodation) is being met by the Jewish CST.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Transcription of Court Or Tribunal Proceedings
    EX107GN Guidance Notes – Request for Transcription of Court or Tribunal proceedings If you want a transcript of proceedings in any court or tribunal (except the Court of Appeal Criminal Division or the Administrative Court*), please complete form EX107. If you want to order a transcript for more than one case, please complete a separate form EX107 for each different case in which you’re interested. Please note that not all Tribunals record proceedings so transcription services may not be available. Enquiries should be made to the relevant tribunal prior to completion of this form. EX107 can be sent digitally or by post to the court or tribunal. Contract details for the relevant venue can be obtained via Court Finder at https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/search/ For Civil and Family jurisdictions where you are selecting a transcription company, you are advised to talk with the transcription company before you complete form EX107. If an EX107 is requested by your chosen transcription company this should, where possible, be sent digitally using the e-mail addresses in Section 2a. You may send by post if you do not have an e-mail account. There may be occasions where a transcript you have requested via the EX107 may have already been produced for HMCTS. There may also be times where the court’s authorised Transcription Company provided a stenographer or court logger to make a record of the proceedings. In these circumstances the court’s authorised Transcription Company will provide the transcript and the court will tell you who to contact. Where a transcript is required of a court hearing which was held in private (ex parte) the process will vary by jurisdiction as follows: a) In cases heard at the Royal Courts of Justice and Crown Courts and some tribunals (or if the Court so orders at other venues), where a transcript is required of Court proceedings which were officially designated by the judge as being held in private (ex-parte), authorisation will be required from a Judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Change at Lewes Crown Court
    News from the South Eastern Circuit THE CIRCUITEER INSIDE THIS ISSUE 8 9 10 12 19 Meeting of the Inns of Court John Downes 23rd Keble A view from the Chairs of the College of Alliot a tribute Course Naval Bar SEC Bar Messes Advocacy (ICCA) ALL CHANGE AT LEADER’S LEWES CROWN REPORT And so, the time has come for me to bid farewell as Leader of COURT this great Circuit. 2016 has been a time of change across Max Hill QC See page 3 the whole of the Criminal Justice System. Lewes Crown Court has seen significant change, with its three most experienced judges retiring in the space of a few months. See page 6 Wellbeing at the Bar Does our wellbeing depend on the respite we all seek to find in holidays or should it be more a part of our daily lives even whilst working. Valerie Charbit See page 22 Reflections of a Circuiteer CIRCUIT TRIP TO PARIS I was called to the Bar in 1963. To practice It has been a number of years since the last circuit trip, and at what was then called the Independent many more since the last to Paris. This diplomatic mission Bar, whether you intended to venture out was long overdue, and, as we discovered from the moment of London or not, you were required to we arrived, a venture enthusiastically welcomed by our join a Circuit. Parisian counterparts. See page 14 See page 5 Igor Judge THE CIRCUITEER Issue 42 / October 2016 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit EDITOR’S COLUMN Much has happened across or friends, we are reminded • 88% of trans people have the Circuit since the Spring of the transient nature of our experienced depression edition, with changes of flickering flames.
    [Show full text]
  • A Barrister's Role in the Plea Decision
    A Barrister’s Role in the Plea Decision: An analysis of drivers affecting advice in the Crown Court By James Dominic Edward Barry Queen Mary, University of London Submitted for PhD I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own …………………………………. Date: ……………………………. James D.E Barry 2 Abstract: This thesis explores the reasons behind barristers' advice to defendants in the Crown Court on plea, primarily through interviews with criminal law practitioners themselves. Beginning with a critical overview of the current research, the thesis argues that the views of criminal barristers are a neglected significant source of information in developing an understanding of why particular advice is given. The thesis, in the context of other research, analyses the data from interviews conducted with current practitioners on the London and the Midlands Circuits, and discusses the various drivers that act upon barristers in deciding what advice to give. Starting with the actual advice given and the advising styles adopted, the thesis explores why guilty pleas might be advised and plea bargains sought with prosecutors. The research goes on to examine the impact of various influences, including legal, ethical, cultural, regional and financial to produce an overview of what factors impact upon a barrister's advice. The thesis argues that the current view of the Bar sustained in much of the literature is insufficiently nuanced and outdated, and that the reasons behind the advice given to defendants on plea are extraordinarily varied, occasionally contradictory, and highly complex. The thesis concludes that the data from the interviews warrants a rethink of why particular advice is given and that discovering what drives barristers’ advice is critical to formulating law and government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court's Jurisdiction in Relation to Criminal
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 184 THE HIGH COURT’S JURISDICTION IN RELATION TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A Consultation Paper The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Etherton, Chairman Mr Stuart Bridge Mr David Hertzell Professor Jeremy Horder Kenneth Parker QC Professor Martin Partington CBE is Special Consultant to the Law Commission responsible for housing law reform. The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Steve Humphreys and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This consultation paper, completed on 1 October 2007, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on its proposals before 22 February 2008. Comments may be sent either – By post to: David Hughes Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1N 2BQ Tel: 020-7453-1212 Fax: 020-7453-1297 By email to: [email protected] It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. We will treat all responses as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and we may attribute comments and include a list of all respondents' names in any final report we publish. Those who wish to submit a confidential response should contact the Commission before sending the response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lord Chief Justice's Report 2020
    The Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2020 The Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2020 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 5(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or email [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.judiciary.uk Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Published by Judicial Office 11th floor Thomas More Building Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL www.judiciary.uk The Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2020 Contents Introduction by the Lord Chief Justice 5 1. The COVID-19 pandemic and the response of the judiciary 7 2. Leading a modern judiciary 9 Leadership of the judiciary 9 Career conversations and appraisal 9 Welfare 10 Training 10 3. Appointments and Diversity 12 Appointments 12 Diversity 12 4. Courts and Tribunals Modernisation 14 Judicial Library and Information Service 15 5. External engagement 16 Working with government and parliament 16 The legal profession 16 Schools 17 Social media 17 6. Judicial Data Protection Panel 18 7. Criminal Justice 19 Court of Appeal Criminal Division 19 Crown Courts 20 Magistrates 21 The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee 21 Sentencing Council 22 The Court Martial 22 8. Civil Justice 23 Court of Appeal Civil Division 23 High Court Civil 23 County Court 25 3 The Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2020 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebecca Upton Call: 1999
    Rebecca Upton Call: 1999 Rebecca Upton practises primarily in the Crown Courts of the South East of England. She also has significant experience in the Court of Appeal, civil and criminal applications made by the police and inquests. ‘She is a very meticulous advocate with a very thorough preparation process.’ Legal 500 2021 “She’s very good at adapting her style to the case she’s handling.” Chambers & Partners 2020 “She is always thoroughly prepared and has a very good rapport with other advocates and judges.” Legal 500 2019 Crime Rebecca has built up a strong criminal practice and undertakes work in all areas of criminal law including murder, manslaughter, death by dangerous / careless driving and other motoring offences, serious violence, sexual offences (including rape and possession of indecent images), drugs, fraud and arson. Rebecca has been led many times and has also been instructed as leading junior. She is often involved in multi handed cases, including conspiracies. Rebecca also has experience in Courts Martial, Environment Agency, Inquest and RSPCA cases, and advises and appears in the Court of Appeal. T: +44 (0)1273 625 625 [email protected] www.1cor.com Rebecca has particular experience in advising on the need for psychiatric / psychological reports and calling expert witnesses. She also has regular cases dealing with vulnerable clients and witnesses, including those who need intermediaries, and those who are very young or mentally unwell. Selected Cases R v JM (2021) Lewes CC: defended JM who was charged with sexual offences against 2 strangers on the same night. R v CC (2021) Lewes CC: junior counsel, CC was accused of murdering his girlfriend whilst they were on a camping trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Faulty Adversarial Performance by Criminal Defenders in the Crown Court
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2001 Faulty Adversarial Performance by Criminal Defenders in the Crown Court Peter W. Tague Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/241 12 King's C. L.J. 137-173 (2001) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Criminal Law Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications February 2010 Faulty Adversarial Performance by Criminal Defenders in the Crown Court 12 King’s C. L.J. 137-173 (2001) Peter W. Tague Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/241/ Posted with permission of the author (2001) 12 KCL] 137 PETER W. TAGUE* FAULTY ADVERSARlAL PERFORMANCE BY CRIMINAL DEFENDERS IN THE CROWN COURT " x THO IS the more able advocate, the lawyer in the United States or the barrister V V in England and Wales?! Answering that question is extremely difficult because of a multitude of differences in the procedural regimes in which each works and in the scope of each's responsibility.2 Yet, one facet stands out, like a full moon in a dark sky: The comparative number of defenders who on appeal have been accused ofhav­ ing provided inappropriate representation in the process leading to conviction.
    [Show full text]