DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario Power Generation Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario Power Generation Inc Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel Commission dexamen conjoint du projet de stockage dans des couches géologiques profondes PMD 13-P1.1A File / dossier : 8.01.07 Date: 2013-07-23 Edocs: 4176322 Written Submission from Mémoire de Ontario Power Generation Inc. Ontario Power Generation Inc. In the Matter of À l’égard de Ontario Power Generation Inc. Ontario Power Generation Inc. Proposed Environmental Impact Statement Étude proposée pour l’énoncé des incidences for OPG’s Deep Geological Repository environnementales pour l’Installation de (DGR) Project for Low and Intermediate stockage de déchets radioactifs à faible et Level Waste moyenne activité dans des couches géologiques profondes Joint Review Panel Commission d’examen conjoint September 16 to October 12, 2013 16 septembre au 12 octobre 2013 ORIGINAL PANEL MEMBER DOCUMENT (PMD) PMD 13-P1.1A Date Submitted: 23 July 2013 Reference PMDs: PMD 13-P1.1 Ontario Power Generation 3XEOLF+HDULQJIRU2QWDULR3RZHU*HQHUDWLRQ¶V'HHSGeologic Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Waste Scheduled for: September 16, 2013 Request for a Decision Regarding: Environmental Assessment for OntarLR3RZHU*HQHUDWLRQ¶VApplication to Prepare a Site and Construct a Deep Geologic Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Waste Submitted by: Ontario Power Generation This page has been left blank intentionally Written Submission Regarding the Environmental Assessment for 23*¶V'HHS*HRORJLF Repository for Low & Intermediate Level Waste TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY«««««««««««««««««««««««««««LLL 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT ...................................................... 2 2.1 Description of the Project ..................................................................................... 4 2.2 Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Alternatives to the Project ...................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Alternative Means of Carrying Out the Project ...................................................... 6 3.0 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ................................................. 7 4.0 FIRST NATIONS ENGAGEMENT ....................................................................... 9 5.0 MÉTIS ENGAGEMENT ........................................................................................ 9 5.1 Historic Saugeen Métis ...................................................................................... 10 5.2 Métis Nation of Ontario ...................................................................................... 10 6.0 APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 11 6.1 The Precautionary Principle ............................................................................... 11 6.2 Sustainability Considerations ............................................................................. 11 6.3 Traditional Knowledge ....................................................................................... 12 7.0 EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT AND MITIGATION ............................................ 12 7.1 Geology ............................................................................................................. 13 7.1.1 Cap Rock Barrier Integrity .................................................................................... 13 7.1.2 Pore Fluid Residence Times ................................................................................ 14 7.1.3 Repository Geomechanics ................................................................................... 14 7.1.4 Waste Rock Management Area ........................................................................... 14 7.1.5 Effects of Dewatering ........................................................................................... 15 7.1.6 Historical Contamination ...................................................................................... 15 7.1.7 Seismicity ............................................................................................................. 15 7.2 Hydrology and Surface Water Quality ................................................................ 16 7.2.1 Hydrology ............................................................................................................. 16 7.2.2 Surface Water Quality .......................................................................................... 18 7.3 Terrestrial Environment ...................................................................................... 19 7.3.1 At-Risk Species .................................................................................................... 20 7.4 Aquatic Environment .......................................................................................... 21 7.5 Radiological Conditions...................................................................................... 22 7.5.1 Radionuclide Inventory ........................................................................................ 22 7.5.2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) ................................... 22 7.5.3 Dose ..................................................................................................................... 23 7.6 Atmospheric Environment .................................................................................. 25 7.6.1 Air Quality ............................................................................................................. 25 7.6.2 Noise and Vibration .............................................................................................. 27 PMD 13-P1.1A i July 23, 2013 Written Submission Regarding the Environmental Assessment for 23*¶V'HHS*HRORJLF Repository for Low & Intermediate Level Waste 7.7 Aboriginal Interests ............................................................................................ 28 7.7.1 First Nations ......................................................................................................... 29 7.7.2 Métis ..................................................................................................................... 29 7.8 Socio-Economic Environment ............................................................................ 31 7.8.1 Economic Modelling ............................................................................................. 31 7.8.2 Tourism ................................................................................................................ 32 7.8.3 Stigma and Property Values ................................................................................ 33 7.8.4 Cultural and Heritage Resources ......................................................................... 33 7.9 Human Health and Quality of Life ...................................................................... 34 7.10 Ecological Features ........................................................................................... 35 7.11 Effects of the Environment on the Project .......................................................... 36 8.0 MALFUNCTIONS, ACCIDENTS AND MALEVOLENT ACTS ........................... 37 9.0 LONG-TERM SAFETY OF THE DGR ................................................................ 39 10.0 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ................................................................................... 42 11.0 FOLLOW-UP MONITORING .............................................................................. 43 12.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 44 13.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 45 14.0 GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................... 48 PMD 13-P1.1A ii July 23, 2013 Written Submission Regarding the Environmental Assessment for 23*¶V'HHS*HRORJLF Repository for Low & Intermediate Level Waste EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This written submission presents DQRYHUYLHZRI2QWDULR3RZHU*HQHUDWLRQ¶V 23* SURMHFWIRU long-term management of its low and intermediate radioactive waste in a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) to be located at the Bruce nuclear site in the Municipality of Kincardine, Ontario. $VXPPDU\RI23*¶VHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVWDWHPHQWIRUWKH'*R Project is also presented. Throughout the public comment period, which began on February 3, 2012, and ended on May 24, 2013, OPG provided responses to 575 Information Requests from the Joint Review Panel. OPG also provided submissions in support of its presentations at three Technical Information Sessions. The Information Request responses provided further information and/or clarification of information presented on the characteristics of the waste to be emplaced in the DGR, the assessment of alternatives to the project, the integrity of the cap rock sequence, management of stormwater and waste rock pile runoff, effects on at-risk species, effects on human health, livestock and wildlife particularly from predicted noise emissions, and the effects RIFOLPDWHFKDQJHDQGVHLVPLFLW\7KLVDGGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQZKLFKLVVXSSOHPHQWDOWR23*¶V April 14, 2011, submission to the Joint Review Panel, is summarized, as appropriate, in this Panel Member Document. The supplementary information provided in the Technical Information Sessions and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collingwood Mb., Lindsay Fm., Stratigraphy and Oil Shale Potential
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Greater Antilles and the Virgin Islands
    Preliminary Geologic Map of the Greater Antilles and the Virgin Islands By Frederic H. Wilson, Greta Orris, and Floyd Gray Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2019–1036 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Wilson, F.H., Orris, G., and Gray, F., 2019, Preliminary geologic map of the Greater Antilles and the Virgin Islands: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2019–1036, pamphlet 50 p., 2 sheets, scales 1:2,500,000 and 1:300,000, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20191036. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Geologic Summary.........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Assessment for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’S Used Nuclear Fuel
    Preliminary Assessment for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel MUNICIPALITY OF CENTRAL HURON, ONTARIO FINDINGS FROM PHASE ONE STUDIES APM-REP-06144-0124 OCTOBER 2015 About the NWMO and its work The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) was created by Canada’s nuclear energy generators in 2002 as a requirement of the Nuclear Fuel Waste Act. The Act requires the NWMO to study, recommend and then implement a plan for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel in Canada. The NWMO approaches its work with the following vision: the long-term management of Canada's nuclear waste in a manner that safeguards people and respects the environment, now and in the future. The NWMO is guided by five fundamental values: Integrity: We will conduct ourselves with openness, honesty and respect for all persons and organizations with whom we deal. Excellence: We will pursue the best knowledge, understanding and innovative thinking in our analysis, engagement processes and decision-making. Engagement: We will seek the participation of all communities of interest and be responsive to a diversity of views and perspectives. We will communicate and consult actively, promoting thoughtful reflection and facilitating a constructive dialogue. Accountability: We will be fully responsible for the wise, prudent and efficient management of resources, and be accountable for all our actions. Transparency: We will be open and transparent in our process, communications and decision- making, so that the approach is clear to all Canadians. The work of the NWMO is subject to federal regulatory oversight and is regulated under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Marine Paleodictyon from the Upper Ordovician Georgian Bay Formation of Southern Ontario
    ATLAN11c GEOLOGY 115 Shallow marine Paleodictyon from the Upper Ordovician Georgian Bay Formation of southern Ontario D.C.A. Stanley and R.K. Pickerill Departmento/Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada Date Received March 1, 1993 Date Accepted April 26, 1993 Two specimens, and a possible third, of the ichnotaxon Paleodictyon are documented from shallow-water marine strata of the Upper Ordovician Georgian Bay Formation of southern Ontario. Its occurrence indicates that previous suggestions of a post-Early Cambrian palaeoenvironmental retreat of Paleodictyon into deeper water require some modification. Instead, the operative migratory process, at least to the Late Ordovician and possibly even longer, was one of expansion and not of retreat. Deux specimens, et possiblement un troisieme, de la trace fossile Paliodictyon sont reconnus dans des strates marines peu profondes de la Formation de Georgian Bay de l'Ordovicien superieur du sud de }'Ontario. Sa presence indique que les suggestions precedentes d'une retraite paleo-environnementale post-Cambrien precoce dePaliodictyon en eaux plus profondes necessitent quelques modifications. A la place, le processus migratoire operatif, au moins jusqu'a l'Ordovicien tardif et possiblement encore plus longtemps, en etait un d'expansion et non de retraite. [Traduit par la redaction] INTRODUCTION but also we demonstrate that its occurrence there suggests Several recent studies in ichnology have demonstrated or that the environmental 'retreat' intimated by Crimes and suggested an environmental shift in the distribution of certain Crossley (199l)and Crimes et al. (1992) is not so straightfor­ marine ichnotaxa throughout their known stratigraphic range. ward as they suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Huiquan Guo Thesis
    Long Term Two-Phase Flow Analysis of the Deep Low Permeability Rock at the Bruce DGR Site by Huiquan Guo A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2011 © Huiquan Guo 2011 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Abnormal pressures have been measured in the deep boreholes at the Bruce site, south- ern Ontario, where a deep geologic repository for low and intermediate level radioactive waste disposal has been proposed. The pressure regime in the stratigraphic units ex- hibits either higher than hydrostatic pressure (over-pressured) or lower than hydrostatic pressure (under-pressured) are considered to be abnormal. At the Bruce site, the Or- dovician sediments are under-pressured while the underlying Cambrian sandstone and the overlying Guelph carbonate are over-pressured. Hypotheses have been documented in literature to explain the phenomenon of abnormal pressures. These hypotheses include osmosis, glacial loading and deglaciation unloading, exhumation of overlying sediments, crustal flexure and the presence of an immiscible gas phase. Previous work on the Bruce site has shown that the under-pressures in the Ordovician limestone and shales could not be explained by glaciation and deglaciation or by saturated analyses. The presence of a gas phase in the Ordovician formations has been determined to be a reasonable cause of the under-pressure developed in the Ordovician shales and limestones at the Bruce site.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Waitaki Area
    GEOLOGY OF THE WAITAKI AREA P. J . FORSYTH ( COMPILER) BffiLlOGRAPIllC REFERENCE Forsyth , I'J.(compiler) 2001: Geology of the Waitaki area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250 000 geological map 19. I sheet + 64p. l..ower Hutt, New Zealand. lnstitute ofGeologicaJ & Nuclear Sciences Limited. Development and maintenanceof ARCIINFO GIS database by D.W. Heron and M.S. Ratlenbury GIS operations by D.W. Heron, B. Smith-Lyttle, B. Morri son and D.Thomas Contributions to offshore geology by A. Duxtield, R.H. Herzer &B.o. Field Edited by D.W. Heron and MJ. Isaac Prepared for publication by P.L. Murray Printed by Graphic Press & Packaging Ltd, Levin ISBN 0-478-09739-5 © Copyri ght Institute of GeologicaI& Nuclear Sciences Limited 200 I FRONT COVER The Waitaki River valley, looking upstream from near Kurow. The modern flood plain has a vegetation cover of scrub and willow, but areas above flood level are intensively farmed. Kurow (middle distance) lies below Kurow Hill and the lower slopes of the 51 Marys Range. Hydroelectric storage lakes are impounded behind the Waitaki and Aviemore dams. The ranges in view are formed of Rakaia terrane sandstone. mudstone and semischist. Photo CN42818-20: D.L. Homer GEOLOGY OF THE WAITAKI AREA Scale 1:250 000 P. J. FORSYTH (COMPILER) Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:250 000 geological map 19 Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited Lower Hutt, New Zealand 2001 CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv TECTO IC HISTORY 40 Keywords.................................................................. v Paleozoic to Mesozoic 40 Late Cretaceous to Midd le Miocene 40 INTRODUCTION . Late Miocene and Pliocene 40 Quaternary tectonics.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan
    Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan AUTHORS Paul A. Catacosinos David B. Westjohn [Professor Emeritus, United States Geological Survey Delta College [Associate Professor (Adjunct), University Center, MI 48710] Michigan State University] 1001 Martingale Lane SE 6520 Mercantile Way #6 Albuquerque, NM 87123-4305 Lansing, MI 48911 William B. Harrison, III Mark S. Wollensak, CPG Professor, Department of Geosciences EarthFax Engineering, Inc. Western Michigan University 15266 Ann Drive Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Bath, MI 48808 Robert F. Reynolds Reynolds Geological, L.L.C. 504 Hall Blvd. Mason, MI, 48854 Bulletin 8 Lansing, Michigan, 2001 Geological Survey Division and the Michigan Basin Geological Society State of Michigan John Engler, Govenor Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Russell J. Harding, Director MDEQ Geological Survey Division, P O Box 30256, Lansing, MI 48909-7756 On the Internet @ HTTP://W WW .DEQ.STATE.MI.US/GSD Printed by Authority of Act 451, PA 1994 as amended The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) will not discriminate Total number of copies printed ........... 1,000 against any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, Total cost: .................................... $2,500.00 color, marital status, disability or political beliefs. Directed questions or concerns to the Cost per copy: ..................................... $2.50 MDEQ Office of Personnel Services, P.O. Box 30473, and Lansing, MI 48909 Page 2 - - Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan DEDICATION The authors gratefully dedicate this volume to the memories of Helen M. Martin and Muriel Tara Straight. This volume would not have been possible without their monumental reference work Bulletin 50, An Index of Helen Melville Martin Michigan Geology published by the Michigan Geological Survey in 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Long-Term Regional Pumping on Hydrochemistry and Dissolved Gas Content in an Undeveloped Shale-Gas-Bearing Aquifer in Southwestern Ontario, Canada
    Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 719–739 DOI 10.1007/s10040-014-1229-7 The effect of long-term regional pumping on hydrochemistry and dissolved gas content in an undeveloped shale-gas-bearing aquifer in southwestern Ontario, Canada Stewart M. Hamilton & Stephen E. Grasby & Jennifer C. McIntosh & Stephen G. Osborn Abstract Baseline groundwater geochemical mapping of oxidized carbon species including CO2,HCO3 and DIC, inorganic and isotopic parameters across 44,000 km2 of suggesting contemporary methanogenesis. Pumping in the southwestern Ontario (Canada) has delineated a discreet Devonian shale contact aquifer may stimulate zone of natural gas in the bedrock aquifer coincident with an methanogenesis by lowering TDS, removing products and 8,000-km2 exposure of Middle Devonian shale. This study replacing reactants, including bicarbonate, derived from describes the ambient geochemical conditions in these shales overlying glacial sedimentary aquifers. in the context of other strata, including Ordovician shales, and discusses shale-related natural and anthropogenic Keywords Hydrochemistry . Shale gas . Water processes contributing to hydrogeochemical conditions in supply . Methane . Canada the aquifer. The three Devonian shales—the Kettle Point Formation (Antrim equivalent), Hamilton Group and Marcellus Formation—have higher DOC, DIC, HCO , 3 Introduction CO2(aq), pH and iodide, and much higher CH4(aq). The two Ordovician shales—the Queenston and Georgian-Bay/Blue Mountain Formations—are higher in Ca, Mg, SO and H S. A groundwater geochemical mapping project by the 4 2 Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) has been completed in In the Devonian shale region, isotopic zones of Pleistocene- 2 aged groundwater have halved in size since first identified in a 44,000 km area of southwestern Ontario, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1056-B
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________ 421 Mesozoic________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Ontariofiiieii GENERATION 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G Lx6
    ONTARIOFiiiEiI GENERATION 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G lX6 April 15, 2013 File: 00216-00531 P CD#: 00216-CORR-00531-00180 Project 10: 10-60004 Dr. Stella Swanson Chair, Joint Review Panel Deep Geologic Repository Project c/o Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 Dear Dr. Swanson: Deep Geologic Repositorv Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste - Submission of Responses to the Second Sub-set of Package #9 Information Requests The purpose of this letter is to provide the attached responses to the second sub-set of Information Requests (IRs) from IR Package #9 (Reference 1) that OPG committed to provide by April 15, 2013, in Reference 2. The Attachment provides the responses to the second sub-set of IRs from Package #9. An updated Tracking Table showing how this submission links to various sections in the documents submitted on April 14, 2011 (References 3 and 4), will be submitted with the final set of responses for IR Package #9, committed for submission by April 30, 2013, in Reference 2. If you have questions on the above, please contact me at (905) 839-1151, extension 6051. Sincerely, Allan Webster Director, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Nuclear Projects Ontario Power Generation Attach. Dr. Stella Swanson April 15, 2013 00216-00531 P cc. Dr. J. Archibald – Joint Review Panel c/o CNSC (Ottawa) Dr. G. Muecke – Joint Review Panel c/o CNSC (Ottawa) P. Elder – CNSC (Ottawa) F. King – NWMO (Toronto) References: 1. JRP letter from Dr. Stella Swanson to Albert Sweetnam, “Information Request Package #9 from the Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel”, February 8, 2013, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00165.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ellesmere Island, 1952
    Fig. 1. Lookingsoutheast across Caledonian Bay, east coast of Canyon Fiord. The peaks inthe back- ground consist of dark limestone, presumably corresponding to the Offley Island formation of Middle Silurian (Late Llandovery; Clinton) age. To theleft of the peak in thecentre may be seen a gap in the ridge. This gap indicates the position of steeply dipping graptolite shales (visible in Fig. 6 as a dark band) which maybelong to the Cape Tyson formation of Late Silurian (Tarannon-Wenlock) age. The low hills near the coast consist of sandstones and shales, which provisionally are referred to the Polaris Harbour formation of doubtfulLate Silurian (Ludlow) age. The “shoulder” or plateau remnantbetween the high peaks and the coast is clearly seen. The arrow indicates the localityshown in Fig. 7. May 1952. GEOLOGICALINVESTIGATIONS IN ELLESMEREISLAND, 1952 J. C. Troelsen* R. LAUGEKOCH’S ideas on the age of the folded mountain system in north Greenland and Ellesmere Island have for the last thirty years been a stormDcentre in Scandinavian geology. It has been maintained by several geologists that Koch’s theory of a Caledonian age of thefolding was not supported by acceptable evidence, and as late as 1950 HansFrebold (1951, p. 42) statedthat: “Das Alterder Nordgronland-GrinnelLLand-Faltenzone ist noch ungeklart und neuerdings bekanntgewordene Tatsachen sprechen fur das Vorliegen jungerer Faltungen in diesem Raume” (“The age of the north Greenland-Grinnell Land zone of folding is notyet known, and recently published evidence suggests the presence of younger foldings within this area”). On the Danish Thule-Ellesmere Land Expedition in the spring of 1940 I attempted unsuccessfully to solve theproblem of the age of the mountain system in Ellesmere Island, though clear evidence was found of a gentle post- Triassic folding.
    [Show full text]