East Side Road Authority All-Season Road Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Side Road Authority All-Season Road Document M A N I T 0 B A Room 200. 155 Carlton Street East Side Road ToIl-Free: 1—866-356-6355 A U 1 H 0 H I T y Fax: (204) 948—2462 October 72016 Ms. Janet Scott Project Manager, Prairie and Northern Region Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Suite I 145, 700 Jasper Avenue Edmonton, AB T5J 4C3 Dear Ms. Scott: Re: Registry File 80094 Response to Information Requests - Environmental Impact Statement for Project 4 All-season Road connecting Berens River and Poplar River First Nation The Environmental Impact Statement for Project 4 All—season Road Connecting Berens River and Poplar River First Nation (Project FIS) was submitted to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, on February 26, 2016 and resubmitted in response to requests thr clarification from the Agency on May 9, 2016. Subsequent to this we received an Information Request froni the Agency on July 14. 20(6 regarding the Project EIS. Please find attached our response to the July 14, 2016 lnlhrmation Request from the Agency. We note that the majority of the intbrniation requested was provided in the Project EMS, in correspondence with the Agency, or in infbrmation provided to federal authorities having interest in the Project. If you have any questions please contact myself or Jajme Clarke. Sincerely. <Original signed by> LEED Ar Manager, Special Projects and Environmental Services LS/sk Attachment cc: Mike Knight. Acting Director Lance Viglusson. Interim CEO and Deputy Minister. Manitoba Infrastructure Traecy Braun, Manitoba Sustainable Development Response to Information Requests – Round #1 Project 4 – All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation Federal Environmental Assessment of Project 4 – All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation Information Requests – Round #1 IR Reference Number Project Effects Reference to EIS Context and Rationale Specific Question / Request for Information Response (e.g. HC- Link to CEAA 2012 to EIS Guidelines IR-01) No Project Description CEAA-01 EIS Chapter 4 The EIS should include a consolidated A. Provide a consolidated summary of proponent A. With regard to summarizing the changes to the project and issues identified Guidelines summary of all changes that have been changes to the project, including proponent’s in on-going engagement, there are no changes subsequent to the , Part 1, made to the Project since originally responses to the issues identified in the proponent’s submitted EIS. The responses to the issues identified in its on-going Section proposed, including the benefits of these on-going engagement activities with Indigenous engagement activities with Indigenous groups can be found in Table 4.6 3.1 changes to the environment, Aboriginal groups (e.g. Poplar River First Nation, Berens River Summary of Key Comments Received, Response and Reference Location peoples, and the public. The EIS should First Nation, Manitoba Métis Federation) such as found in Chapter 4 of the EIS and Chapter 4 Appendices. document any additional issues and concerns related to project component siting, B. With regard to updated descriptions of the project’s potential effects and concerns raised by Indigenous groups in heritage and cultural sites, habitat compensation proposed mitigation, there are no changes subsequent to the submitted relation to the environmental effects plans such as a fisheries offsetting plan, and any EIS. No updates to the effects or residual effects are required. assessment and the potential adverse other issues raised in comments provided to the impacts of the project on potential or proponent by Indigenous groups. established rights. B. Update descriptions of project potential effects and proposed mitigations as a result of any changes. Re- The EIS (Chapter 4, p. 4-38) states “The assess residual effects to project valued APEP will continue throughout the components and update conclusions presented in development of the Project, and will the EIS. provide updated information and opportunities for all interested parties to continue commenting on the Project. Comments and input received will be reviewed to assess whether the information alters the effects assessment and/or warrants modifications to proposed mitigation measures”. Project changes are described throughout the EIS document but a consolidated summary is absent. CEAA-02 EIS EIS The proponent information in the EIS A. The Agency requests formal notification of the A. With regard to a formal name change of the proponent, there is no change Guidelines Summary, should identify the legal entity that would proponent name change for Project 4, updates to at this time. Manitoba Infrastructure is taking responsibility for the East , Part 2, Chapter 1. develop, manage, and operate the project the EIS to reflect any changes to corporate policies Side Transportation Initiative and associated projects as of November 25, Section Introducti as well as specify the mechanism used to resulting from this change and any updated contact 2016. 1.1 on and ensure that corporate policies will be 1 Last Updated : October 7, 2016 Response to Information Requests – Round #1 Project 4 – All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation IR Reference Number Project Effects Reference to EIS Context and Rationale Specific Question / Request for Information Response (e.g. HC- Link to CEAA 2012 to EIS Guidelines IR-01) Overview implemented and respected for the project. information for the proponent. Manitoba issued a press release in May 2016 noting that ESRA is dissolved and its mandate is repatriated into Manitoba Infrastructure. The EIS references ESRA as the proponent throughout the document and in Environmental Protection Procedures describing mitigation commitments. CEAA-03 19(1)(g) – EIS Chapter 2, The EIS describes alternative means for the A. Potential quarry locations are noted in Appendix 3- A. With regard to potential quarry sites noted in Appendix 3-3 and the rational alternative means Guidelines Project project as a whole (EIS, Chapter 2, Project 3, Figure 3-3, where “distance to waterbody” is employed if alternatives have been eliminated, this information is and , Part 2, Justificatio Justification and Alternatives Considered) indicated. Describe whether any of the alternatives contained in the EIS. No additional information is required to be provided environmental Section n and but does not evaluate environmental have been eliminated and provide the rationale for at this time. effects of 2.2 Alternativ effects associated with the alternative this. Characterize for each remaining potential alternative means es means for project components, including quarry location: With respect to the request to characterize for each remaining potential Considere alternative siting and locations for potential i. proximity to fish-habitat; quarry location: d quarry and borrow areas, and temporary ii. proximity to wetlands; construction camps and staging areas. iii. terrestrial habitat loss (area) by vegetation cover i. Proximity to fish habitat is found on the maps outlined in Appendix 3-3 Chapter 5, Instead, the EIS states “potential quarry type; Potential Quarry Site Locations, Figure 3-3 P4 All-Season Road Proposed Appendice and borrow areas will be selected using a iv. proximity to human health receptors, e.g. Watercourse Crossings. See map in Annex 1 for further clarification. s, variety of factors…” (p. 2-9), and that traplines, residences, camps, First Nations Environme temporary camps and staging areas “…will reserve lands; Information on quarry selection, with regard to proximity to fish habitat, ntal be selected for the construction of the v. proximity to sites of cultural and heritage value; can be found in the EIS: Protection proposed road and crossings based on and Chapter 4 Aboriginal and Public Engagement: Procedure consideration of factors…” (p. 2-9). vi. potential impact to rights, proposed Section 4.4 Additional Engagement Information; s accommodate measures, and views of groups Section 4.7 Future Engagement Activities; listed Section 5 of Part 1 of the EIS guidelines on Chapter 5 Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development: proposed accommodations. Section 5.4.1 Contract Specifications; B. For proposed quarries (290 ha), temporary staging Appendix 5-3 Environmental Protection Procedures: areas (57 ha), and construction camps (64 ha), . EPP14.0.12 Wildlife; describe the environmental effects to be considered . EPP6.4.1 Working Within or Near Fish Bearing Waters; as factors in site selection and the ranking process . EPP20 5.2 Quarry Site Selection and Requirements; to be used in selecting preferred sites. List and Appendix 5-4 GR130s Environmental Protection Specifications: describe the environmental protection measures . GR130.8.5 Designated Areas and Access; that will be applied to quarries, temporary staging . GR130.9.2.5.9 Petroleum Handling and Storage; area and construction camps. Describe how . GR130.15.1.1 Working Within or Near Water – General; potential sites will be confirmed to meet these . GR130.15.1.2 Working Within or Near Water – General; protection criteria. GR130.15.1.3 Working Within or Near Water – General; 2 Last Updated : October 7, 2016 Response to Information Requests – Round #1 Project 4 – All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation IR Reference Number Project Effects Reference to EIS Context and Rationale Specific Question / Request for Information Response (e.g. HC- Link to CEAA 2012 to EIS Guidelines IR-01) C. Appendix 5-3 describes the mitigation
Recommended publications
  • Pimachiowin Aki Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 ON THE COVER Poplar River First Nation students at Pinesewapikung Sagaigan (Weaver Lake), summer 2020 Pimachiowin Aki Corporation Pimachiowin Aki Corporation is a not-for-profit charitable organization with a mandate to coordinate and integrate actions to protect and present the Outstanding Universal Value of an Anishinaabe cultural landscape and global boreal biome. Pimachiowin Aki is a 29,040 km2 World Heritage Site in eastern Manitoba and northwestern Ontario. The site was inscribed on the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage List in 2018. The Corporation is a partnership of the Anishinaabe First Nations of Bloodvein River, Little Grand Rapids, Pauingassi and Poplar River, and the governments of Manitoba and Ontario. The Corporation’s Vision Pimachiowin Aki is celebrated for its cultural and natural values, and regarded as a model of sustainability. Pimachiowin Aki is an organization that is recognized as a cross-cultural, community-based leader in World Heritage Site management. The Corporation’s Mission To acknowledge and support Anishinaabe culture and safeguard the boreal forest; preserving a living cultural landscape to ensure the well-being of Anishinaabeg and for the benefit and enjoyment of all people. Table of Contents Message from the Co-Chairs ....................................................... 1 Board of Directors and Staff ........................................................ 2 Pimachiowin Aki World Heritage Site.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty 5 Treaty 2
    Bennett Wasahowakow Lake Cantin Lake Lake Sucker Makwa Lake Lake ! Okeskimunisew . Lake Cantin Lake Bélanger R Bélanger River Ragged Basin Lake Ontario Lake Winnipeg Nanowin River Study Area Legend Hudwin Language Divisi ons Cobham R Lake Cree Mukutawa R. Ojibway Manitoba Ojibway-Cree .! Chachasee R Lake Big Black River Manitoba Brandon Winnipeg Dryden !. !. Kenora !. Lily Pad !.Lake Gorman Lake Mukutawa R. .! Poplar River 16 Wakus .! North Poplar River Lake Mukwa Narrowa Negginan.! .! Slemon Poplarville Lake Poplar Point Poplar River Elliot Lake Marchand Marchand Crk Wendigo Point Poplar River Poplar River Gilchrist Palsen River Lake Lake Many Bays Lake Big Stone Point !. Weaver Lake Charron Opekamank McPhail Crk. Lake Poplar River Bull Lake Wrong Lake Harrop Lake M a n i t o b a Mosey Point M a n i t o b a O n t a r i o O n t a r i o Shallow Leaf R iver Lewis Lake Leaf River South Leaf R Lake McKay Point Eardley Lake Poplar River Lake Winnipeg North Etomami R Morfee Berens River Lake Berens River P a u i n g a s s i Berens River 13 ! Carr-Harris . Lake Etomami R Treaty 5 Berens Berens R Island Pigeon Pawn Bay Serpent Lake Pigeon River 13A !. Lake Asinkaanumevatt Pigeon Point .! Kacheposit Horseshoe !. Berens R Kamaskawak Lake Pigeon R !. !. Pauingassi Commissioner Assineweetasataypawin Island First Nation .! Bradburn R. Catfish Point .! Ridley White Beaver R Berens River Catfish .! .! Lake Kettle Falls Fishing .! Lake Windigo Wadhope Flour Point Little Grand Lake Rapids Who opee .! Douglas Harb our Round Lake Lake Moar .! Lake Kanikopak Point Little Grand Pigeon River Little Grand Rapids 14 Bradbury R Dogskin River .! Jackhead R a p i d s Viking St.
    [Show full text]
  • Asatiwisipe Aki Management Plan – Poplar River First Nation
    May 2011 ASATIWISIPE AKI MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT May, 2011 Poplar River First Nation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND SPECIAL THANKS benefit of our community. She has been essential to documenting our history and traditional use and occupancy. The most important acknowledgement goes to our ancestors who loved and cherished this land and cared for it for centuries to ensure all Thanks go to the Province of Manitoba for financial assistance and to future generations would have life. Their wisdom continues to guide us the staff of Manitoba Conservation for their assistance and support. today in our struggles to keep the land in its natural beauty as it was created. We are very grateful to all of our funders and particularly to the Metcalf Foundation for its support and for believing in the importance of a The development and completion of the Asatiwisipe Aki Lands Lands Management Plan for our community. We would also like to thank Management Plan has occurred because of the collective efforts of many. the Canadian Boreal Initiative for their support. Our Elders have been the driving force for guidance, direction and motivation for this project and it is their wisdom, knowledge, and Meegwetch experience that we have captured within the pages of our Plan. Our Steering Committee of Elders, youth, Band staff and Council, and other community members have worked tirelessly to review and provide Poplar River First Nation feedback on the many maps, text and other technical materials that have Land Management Plan Project been produced as part of this process. Community Team Members We, the Anishinabek of Poplar River First Nation, have been fortunate Thanks go to the following people for their time, energy and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • SNC Figure 7-11-Oct09.Mxd
    M er u Poplar River 16 r Riv k Wakus opla ut rth P aw No a R Lake Ontario .! . Lake .! Slemon Negginan .! Winnipeg Poplarville Lake Poplar Study Point Area P op la r R Elliot Lake iv er Manitoba Marchand M ar Wendigo Point cha nd Gilchrist Lake Palsen River Lake Cr k Lake Manitoba Brandon Winnipeg !. !. Kenora Dryden !. !. Many Bays Lake Big Stone Point Opekamank !. Weaver Lake Charron ail Crk. McPh Lake P o p la r Bull R iv Lake e r a a Wrong Lake b b o Harrop Lake o Mosey Point i i o o r r t t i i a a t t n Shallow n River f n Lake a n Lea Lewis a Leaf River Sou Lake O O M th M McKay Point Le af P R Eardley Lake o p la r R iv e r i R Lake Winnipeg Etomam North Morfee Lake Project Terminus Station 156+211.731 5799349.082 N 642855.071 E Berens River R Carr-Harris Berens River 13 mi ma Lake Eto Berens B Island e Pigeon re Pawn Bay ns R Serpent Lake Pigeon River 13A !. Lake Pigeon Point .! Asinkaanumevatt Kacheposit Horseshoe Be !. Kamaskawak rens R Lake P !. Pauingassi Commissioner ig !. eo Island n Assineweetasataypawin R. R First Nation rn dbu .! Bra Catfish Point .! W B h e i re Catfish te n B s e R Lake a i v v e er r R Fishing Lake Windigo Flour Point Little Grand Lake Rapids Whoopee .! Douglas Harbour Round Lake Lake Moar .! Lake Kanikopak Point Pi Little Grand Rapids 14 ge Br o adb n ury R R iv Dogskin River .! Jackhead er St.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation
    Project Description Project 4 - All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation Prepared for: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Submitted by: Manitoba Floodway & East Side Road Authority November 2014 Table of Contents Page Table of Contents iii List of Figures v List of Photos v List of Maps vi List of Attachments vi 1 GENERAL INFORMATION AND CONTACTS ............................................................................. 7 1.1 Nature of the Project and Proposed Location .............................................................. 7 1.2 Proponent Information ................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1 Name of the Project ........................................................................................ 7 1.2.2 Name of the Proponent ................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Address of the Proponent ............................................................................... 8 1.2.4 Chief Executive Officer .................................................................................... 8 1.2.5 Principal Contact Person ................................................................................. 8 1.3 Jurisdictions and Other Parties Consulted .................................................................... 9 1.4 Environmental Assessment Requirements ................................................................. 10 1.4.1 Canadian
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Winnipeg Sturgeon As an Aboriginal Resource
    "Officers of the HBC, Missionaries and Other Intelligent Persons in the District of Keewatin": Lake Winnipeg Sturgeon as an Aboriginal Resource CHRISTOPHER HANNIBAL-PACI University of Manitoba The history of colonization for aboriginal resources will be discussed through a case study of Cree and Ojibwe inland lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) fisheries in the Lake Winnipeg basin, for the period 1872-98. To understand the place of sturgeon in Cree and Ojibwe communities around Lake Winnipeg, and the impacts of commercialization, an interdisciplinary approach is required — gaps in knowledge occur and are bridged by borrowing from specialized studies reflecting a variety of disciplinary perspectives.1 Archaeologists have found evidence of sturgeon use in North America dating back 6000 to 11,000 years ago (Mayer-Oakes 1967, O'Brien 1976). Limited excavations in Manitoba indicate that sturgeon has been an important subsistence resource for at least 4000 years (Arthurs 1982; Steinbrmg, personal communication, 1996). There are, however, problems with recovery, analysis and reporting of sturgeon remains for this area. Sturgeon remains do not last; the fish has a mostly cartilaginous skeleton which decomposes, leaving only trace remains such as scutes and spines. However, Frank Tough (personal communication, 1996) credits the lack of evidence to archaeologists' disinterest in fish remains. In Manitoba, faunal remains have been underrated in most archaeological excavations and therefore have provided relatively little insight into prehistoric fisheries (Hannibal-Paci 1997). This gap can be bridged using historical and ethnographic information to provide a fuller account. 1 Conversations with people at Sagkeeng, Cumberland House, and Cross Lake compelled me to search primary and secondary historic and scientific sources for data regarding aboriginal sturgeon use, otherwise aboriginal perceptions on the fishery are extrapolated from non-aboriginal writings.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2007 from Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Park Reserve To: Poplar River First Nation Asatiwisipe Aki Protected Lands
    BRIEF: April 2007 From Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Park Reserve to: Poplar River First Nation Asatiwisipe Aki Protected Lands • The Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Protected Area covers 777,270 ha (1,920,680 acres) of Manitoba Boreal forest lands and waters on the east side of the province, near the top of the eastern shore of Lake Winnipeg • As part of Manitoba’s Boreal regions (2/3 of the province) the dominant landscape feature within the Protected Area is stands of spruce, pine, tamarack and fir. Muskeg (a mat of sphagnum moss and water), peat bogs, rivers, cold lakes and wetlands abound. • Lake Winnipeg provides the western border of the Protected Area – important as the fifth-largest freshwater Lake in Canada and 10th in the world • The lands within the Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Protected Area are an example of an intact Boreal ecosystem where natural processes such as fire, wind and insects plus climate determine species’ cycles as well as functions of the boreal ecosystem. Due to large size and intactness, the boreal forest here provides ecological services that benefit Poplar River First Nation members, Manitobans and the world: . clean water through water filtration . clean air through oxygen production . rebuilding of soils and restoration of nutrients . holding back floodwaters and releasing needed water into rivers and streams . carbon storage through absorption of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into the soil, trees, and water systems . maintaining biodiversity by providing habitat for countless species • Logging, mining, and development of oil, petroleum, natural gas or hydro-electric resources are legally prohibited within protected areas in Manitoba, as are activities that risk significant impacts on habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • UN-GGIM Country Report of Canada 2018
    UNITED NATIONS STATISTICS DIVISION Country Report of 2018 Prepared by: Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Natural Resources Canada Table of Contents Country Report Overview ............................................................................................................. i I. Introduction: Canada’s Political Landscape and Policy Priorities ............................... 1 II. Canada’s International Responsibilities and Activities in Geomatics ........................... 6 III. Canadian Spatial Data Infrastructure ............................................................................. 8 IV. Collaborative SDI Initiatives: ......................................................................................... 11 Arctic Spatial Data Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 11 Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure ............................................................................................ 13 Spatial Data Infrastructure Manual for the Americas ............................................................... 15 Open Geospatial Consortium .................................................................................................... 15 Canadian Council on Geomatics ............................................................................................... 17 GeoBase .................................................................................................................................... 17 Geographical Names Board
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule K – List of Federal Indian Day Schools
    SCHEDULE K – LIST OF FEDERAL INDIAN DAY SCHOOLS Closing or Transfer Religious Province School Name Name Variants Opening Date Date Location Affiliation Alberta Alexander November 1, 1949 September 1, 1981 In Riviere qui Barre Roman Catholic Glenevis Located on the Alexis Alberta Alexis Alexis Elementary June 1, 1949 September 1, 1990 Reserve Roman Catholic Assumption, Alberta on Alberta Assumption Day September 9, 1968 September 1, 1971 Hay Lakes Reserve Roman Catholic Atikameg, AB; Atikameg (St. Atikamisie Indian Reserve; Alberta Atikameg Benedict) March 1, 1949 September 1, 1962 Atikameg Lake, AB Roman Catholic Alberta Beaver Lake September 1, 1952 June 30, 1960 Lac La Biche, AB Roman Catholic Bighorn Ta Otha Located on the Big Horn Ta Otha (Bighorn) Reserve near Rocky Mennonite Alberta Big Horn Taotha March 1, 1949 September 1, 1989 Mountain House United Church Fort Chipewyan September 1, 1956 June 30, 1963 Alberta Bishop Piché School Chipewyan September 1, 1971 September 1, 1985 Fort Chipewyan, AB Roman Catholic Alberta Blue Quills February 1, 1971 July 1, 1972 St. Paul, AB Alberta Boyer River September 1, 1955 September 1, 1964 Rocky Lane, AB Roman Catholic June 1, 1916 June 30, 1920 March 1, 1922 June 30, 1933 At Beaver Crossing on the Alberta Cold Lake LeGoff1 September 1, 1953 September 1, 1997 Cold Lake Reserve Roman Catholic Alberta Crowfoot Blackfoot December 31, 1968 September 1, 1989 Cluny, AB Roman Catholic Faust, AB (Driftpile Alberta Driftpile September 1, 1955 September 1, 1964 Reserve) Roman Catholic Dunbow (St. Joseph’s) Industrial Alberta School 1884 December 30, 1922 High River, Alberta Roman Catholic 1 Still a federally-operated school.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Sharing Circle Briefing Note: Poplar River First Nation
    Community Sharing Circle Briefing Note Poplar River First Nation, Manitoba Briefing Note of IISD’s Natural and Social Capital Program and the IISD Foresight Group October 2011 Purpose and Context of the Sharing Circle An interactive sharing circle-style workshop was held in Poplar River on March 22, 2011 to explore a series of questions to better understand how the local environment helps maintain and improve the well-being of First Nations peoples living in remote communities. The sharing circle also discussed observed changes in the local environment and how the community might possibly cope with and adapt to future environmental changes related to climate variability and change. The sharing circle was facilitated by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). The insights compiled serve several purposes, including informing local planning efforts and the Pimachawin Aki’s proposal for World Heritage Site status. IISD will also harness the insights to help advance practical terminology for communicating to policy-makers the important linkages between human well-being and the variety of services provided by the environment. About Poplar River First Nation Poplar River First Nation is located on the east side of Lake Winnipeg at the mouth of the Poplar River, approximately 340 km north of Winnipeg. Their traditional territory consists of the Poplar River/Nanowin Park Reserve, which covers a surface area of approximately 7,773 km2 and is located entirely in Manitoba. There are no outstanding treaty land entitlements on their land. The Poplar River First Nation has a registered population of 1,606 people as of August 2011, with 1,210 living on the reserve.1 Of the total population, 400 people declared being in the labour force, working mostly in the services sector (health care, social services, educational services, government services, sales) with the rest of the employment in the trades, primary and processing industries (transport, manufacturing, utilities, equipment operators and related occupations).
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Vitality in Manitoba
    Linguistic Vitality in Manitoba A survey of language, health, and wellbeing in a northern Ojibwa community Stephen Kesselman University of Manitoba Poplar River First Nation Azaadiwi-ziibi Nitam-Anishinaabe o The People and Language • ~ 1200 residents • Majority Ojibwa, some Metis Nation • Ojibwe Continuum • Northwestern, Anishinaabemowin – EGIDS 7 ‘shifting’ o The Land and Community • Sophia Rabliauaskas • Pimachiowin Aki -The Land that gives Life world heritage project Poplar River First Nation (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Anishinaabewaki.jpg) Poplar River language survey project Motivating questions: What?, How?, and Why? of describing linguistic health • What is guiding this description? - Limits of LVE and EGIDS - modified framework adapted from LVE • How is it being done? - Survey method, ‘bottom-up’ approach • Why are we doing it? 1. Describe the vitality of Ojibwe in PRFN from the eyes of those who live there. 2. Consider linguistic vitality in terms of determinants of health Our Framework A re-envisioning of LVE Removes: Factors of Vitality • Documentation 1 Intergenerationality Consolidates: 2 Number of Speakers • Numbers – total and proportional • Attitudes – community and official 3 Domains and Functions • Domains – all domains 4 Attitudes and Beliefs Redefines: 5 Access to Educational Materials • Materials Adds: 6 Programs • Programs – Ongoing and planned 7 Language Knowledge • Knowledge – compared to self-reports and relative to age-groups and total numbers The Survey Questionnaire design and target factors o 4 Sections Vitality Factor # of relevant 1. Background questions 2. Attitudes and Beliefs 1 Attitudes and Beliefs 14 3. Ojibway in the Community 2 Domains and Functions 9 4. Language Knowledge 3 Knowledge 9 o Questions specific to target factors 4 Intergenerationality 8 5 Number of Speakers 5 o Factors represented proportionately 6 Programs 4 to their relevance, for our purposes 7 Access to Materials 2 The Survey Questions – targeting factors e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Non-Anonymous Birds
    Jim Duncan A young The Importance of Barred Owl chick, recently Non-anonymous Birds fledged and about to be Encounters with Banded Owls banded. by Jim Duncan, Manager of the Biodiversity and Endangered Species Section, Manitoba Conservation housands of birds pass through our lives but sometimes a particular individual bird leaves its mark Ton us – like the Ruffed Grouse ‘George’ that stalked my wife and family in our yard for over 8 months. Many of us want to think (or are even convinced) that ‘our pair’ of robins has returned to our home garden. Occasionally a unique feature, such as a raspy atypical song or an injury (such as the one-legged female Red-winged his practice requires Blackbird encountered “T considerable effort, over many years by Bob and is undertaken under Nero in Charleswood), permit and with strict confirms our suspicion. In the world of scientific animal care guidelines...” literature however, anecdotal speculation about the identification of individual birds and their associated biology are routinely and ruthlessly eliminated by editors with thick red pens. Thus to expound any facts or theories on individual birds in such IN THIS ISSUE... venues requires more extreme methods – capturing birds and applying Canadian Wildlife Service bands. The Importance of Non-anonymous Birds .... p. 1 & 5 President’s Corner ..................................... p. 2 & 16 My wife Patsy, a biologist, and I have been banding Great Gray Owls and other owl species in Manitoba for over 25 Member Profile: John Gray ................................p. 3 years, along with colleagues such as Herb Copland, Bob BIG TREES, Little Trees ........................................p.
    [Show full text]