DOCSLIB.ORG

All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation Project Description Project 4 - All-Season Road Connecting Berens River to Poplar River First Nation Prepared for: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Submitted by: Manitoba Floodway & East Side Road Authority November 2014 Table of Contents Page Table of Contents iii List of Figures v List of Photos v List of Maps vi List of Attachments vi 1 GENERAL INFORMATION AND CONTACTS ............................................................................. 7 1.1 Nature of the Project and Proposed Location .............................................................. 7 1.2 Proponent Information ................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1 Name of the Project ........................................................................................ 7 1.2.2 Name of the Proponent ................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Address of the Proponent ............................................................................... 8 1.2.4 Chief Executive Officer .................................................................................... 8 1.2.5 Principal Contact Person ................................................................................. 8 1.3 Jurisdictions and Other Parties Consulted .................................................................... 9 1.4 Environmental Assessment Requirements ................................................................. 10 1.4.1 Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (Canada) ........................... 10 1.4.2 The Environment Act (Manitoba) .................................................................. 10 1.4.3 Canada‐Manitoba Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation 10 1.5 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................... 10 1.6 Regional planning context .......................................................................................... 11 2 PROJECT INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Provisions of Regulations Designating Physical Activities .......................................... 13 2.3 Project Components and Activities ............................................................................. 13 2.3.1 Physical Works Associated with the Designated Project .............................. 13 2.3.2 Anticipated Size and Capacity of the Designated Project ............................. 13 2.3.3 Project Components that are Expansions ..................................................... 14 2.3.4 Activities Incidental to the Designated Project ............................................. 14 2.4 Emissions, Discharges and Wastes ............................................................................. 14 2.4.1 Atmospheric contaminant emissions ............................................................ 14 2.4.2 Liquid Discharges ........................................................................................... 15 ii 2.4.3 Types of Waste and Disposal plans ............................................................... 15 2.5 Project Phases and Scheduling ................................................................................... 15 2.5.1 Anticipated Scheduling .................................................................................. 15 2.5.2 Main activities in each phase of the designated project .............................. 16 2.5.3 Planning and Design ...................................................................................... 16 2.5.4 Pre‐Construction ........................................................................................... 16 2.5.5 Construction .................................................................................................. 17 2.5.6 Operation and Maintenance ......................................................................... 19 3 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................. 19 3.1 Location Description ................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Coordinates ................................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Site Map/Plan .............................................................................................................. 20 3.3.1 Detailed Site Maps ........................................................................................ 20 3.3.2 Photographs of Work Locations .................................................................... 21 3.3.3 Proximities ..................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Land and Water Use .................................................................................................... 22 3.4.1 Zoning Designations ...................................................................................... 22 3.4.2 Legal Description ........................................................................................... 23 3.4.3 Land/Water Use, Resource Management and Conservation Plans .............. 23 3.4.4 Lands/Resources Used for Traditional Purposes .......................................... 24 4 FEDERAL INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Financial Support ........................................................................................................ 25 4.2 Federal Land ................................................................................................................ 25 4.3 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................... 26 4.3.1 Explosives Act ................................................................................................ 26 4.3.2 Navigation Protection Act ............................................................................. 26 4.3.3 Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 .......................................................... 26 4.3.4 Fisheries Act .................................................................................................. 26 4.3.5 Indian Act ....................................................................................................... 26 4.3.6 Crown Lands Act (Manitoba) ......................................................................... 26 4.3.7 Mines and Minerals Act (Manitoba) ............................................................. 26 4.3.8 Other (Manitoba) .......................................................................................... 27 iii 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 27 5.1 Biophysical Setting ...................................................................................................... 27 5.1.1 Climate and Air Quality ................................................................................. 27 5.1.2 Physiography and Surficial Geology .............................................................. 27 5.1.3 Vegetation and Forest Cover ......................................................................... 28 5.1.4 Surface Water ................................................................................................ 28 5.1.5 Groundwater ................................................................................................. 29 5.1.6 Fish and Fish Habitat ..................................................................................... 29 5.1.7 Mammals ....................................................................................................... 30 5.1.8 Birds ............................................................................................................... 31 5.1.9 Amphibians and Reptiles ............................................................................... 32 5.1.10 Species of Conservation Concern .................................................................. 32 5.2 Potential Changes in the Environment ....................................................................... 34 5.2.1 Fish and Fish Habitat ..................................................................................... 35 5.2.2 Marine Plants ................................................................................................ 35 5.2.3 Migratory Birds .............................................................................................. 35 5.3 Potential Changes on Federal and Adjacent Lands .................................................... 36 5.4 Potential Effects on Aboriginal Peoples of Changes to the Environment .................. 36 6 Engagement & Consultation with Aboriginal groups .......................................................... 37 6.1 Interested and Potentially Affected Aboriginal Groups ............................................. 39 6.1.1 First Nations ................................................................................................... 40 6.1.2 Other Aboriginal ............................................................................................ 40 6.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes
    Zawadzka Temagami Area Rock Art 159 Beyond the Sacred: Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes Dagmara Zawadzka The rock art of the Temagami area in northeastern Ontario represents one of the largest concentrations of this form of visual expression on the Canadian Shield. Created by Algonquian-speaking peoples, it is an inextricable part of their cultural landscape. An analysis of the distribution of 40 pictograph sites in relation to traditional routes known as nastawgan has revealed that an overwhelming majority are located on these routes, as well as near narrows, portages, or route intersections. Their location seems to point to their role in the navigation of the landscape. It is argued that rock art acted as a wayfinding landmark; as a marker of places linked to travel rituals; and, ultimately, as a sign of human occupation in the landscape. The tangible and intangible resources within which rock art is steeped demonstrate the relationships that exist among people, places, and the cultural landscape, and they point to the importance of this form of visual expression. Introduction interaction in the landscape. It may have served as The boreal forests of the Canadian Shield are a boundary, resource, or pathway marker. interspersed with places where pictographs have Therefore, it may have conveyed information that been painted with red ochre. Pictographs, located transcends the religious dimension of rock art and most often on vertical cliffs along lakes and rivers, of the landscape. are attributed to Algonquian-speaking peoples and This paper discusses the rock art of the attest, along with petroglyphs, petroforms, and Temagami area in northeastern Ontario in relation lichen glyphs, to a tradition that is at least 2000 to the traditional pathways of the area known as years old (Aubert et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBAL COUNCIL REPORT COVID-19 TESTING and DISEASE in FIRST NATIONS on RESERVE JULY 26, 2021 *The Reports Covers COVID-19 Testing Since the First Reported Case
    TRIBAL COUNCIL REPORT COVID-19 TESTING AND DISEASE IN FIRST NATIONS ON RESERVE JULY 26, 2021 *The reports covers COVID-19 testing since the first reported case. The last TC report provided was on Monday July 19, 2021. DOTC Total Cases 252 Recovered Cases 240 New Cases 1 Active Cases 4 Total Deaths 8 FARHA Total Cases 1833 Recovered Cases 1814 New Cases 1 Active Cases 8 Total Deaths 11 Independent-North Total Cases 991 Recovered Cases 977 New Cases 0 Active Cases 4 Total Deaths 10 This summary report is intended to provide high-level analysis of COVID-19 testing and disease in First Nations on reserve by Tribal Council Region since first case until date noted above. JULY 26, 2021 Independent- South Total Cases 425 Recovered Cases 348 New Cases 36 Active Cases 74 Total Deaths 3 IRTC Total Cases 651 Recovered Cases 601 New Cases 11 Active Cases 38 Total Deaths 12 KTC Total Cases 1306 Recovered Cases 1281 New Cases 1 Active Cases 15 Total Deaths 10 This summary report is intended to provide high-level analysis of COVID-19 testing and disease in First Nations on reserve by Tribal Council Region since first case until date noted above. JULY 26, 2021 SERDC Total Cases 737 Recovered Cases 697 New Cases 14 Active Cases 31 Total Deaths 9 SCTC Total Cases 1989 Recovered Cases 1940 New Cases 11 Active Cases 31 Total Deaths 18 WRTC Total Cases 377 Recovered Cases 348 New Cases 2 Active Cases 25 Total Deaths 4 This summary report is intended to provide high-level analysis of COVID-19 testing and disease in First Nations on reserve by Tribal Council Region since first case until date noted above.
    [Show full text]
  • Pimachiowin Aki Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 ON THE COVER Poplar River First Nation students at Pinesewapikung Sagaigan (Weaver Lake), summer 2020 Pimachiowin Aki Corporation Pimachiowin Aki Corporation is a not-for-profit charitable organization with a mandate to coordinate and integrate actions to protect and present the Outstanding Universal Value of an Anishinaabe cultural landscape and global boreal biome. Pimachiowin Aki is a 29,040 km2 World Heritage Site in eastern Manitoba and northwestern Ontario. The site was inscribed on the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage List in 2018. The Corporation is a partnership of the Anishinaabe First Nations of Bloodvein River, Little Grand Rapids, Pauingassi and Poplar River, and the governments of Manitoba and Ontario. The Corporation’s Vision Pimachiowin Aki is celebrated for its cultural and natural values, and regarded as a model of sustainability. Pimachiowin Aki is an organization that is recognized as a cross-cultural, community-based leader in World Heritage Site management. The Corporation’s Mission To acknowledge and support Anishinaabe culture and safeguard the boreal forest; preserving a living cultural landscape to ensure the well-being of Anishinaabeg and for the benefit and enjoyment of all people. Table of Contents Message from the Co-Chairs ....................................................... 1 Board of Directors and Staff ........................................................ 2 Pimachiowin Aki World Heritage Site.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty 5 Treaty 2
    Bennett Wasahowakow Lake Cantin Lake Lake Sucker Makwa Lake Lake ! Okeskimunisew . Lake Cantin Lake Bélanger R Bélanger River Ragged Basin Lake Ontario Lake Winnipeg Nanowin River Study Area Legend Hudwin Language Divisi ons Cobham R Lake Cree Mukutawa R. Ojibway Manitoba Ojibway-Cree .! Chachasee R Lake Big Black River Manitoba Brandon Winnipeg Dryden !. !. Kenora !. Lily Pad !.Lake Gorman Lake Mukutawa R. .! Poplar River 16 Wakus .! North Poplar River Lake Mukwa Narrowa Negginan.! .! Slemon Poplarville Lake Poplar Point Poplar River Elliot Lake Marchand Marchand Crk Wendigo Point Poplar River Poplar River Gilchrist Palsen River Lake Lake Many Bays Lake Big Stone Point !. Weaver Lake Charron Opekamank McPhail Crk. Lake Poplar River Bull Lake Wrong Lake Harrop Lake M a n i t o b a Mosey Point M a n i t o b a O n t a r i o O n t a r i o Shallow Leaf R iver Lewis Lake Leaf River South Leaf R Lake McKay Point Eardley Lake Poplar River Lake Winnipeg North Etomami R Morfee Berens River Lake Berens River P a u i n g a s s i Berens River 13 ! Carr-Harris . Lake Etomami R Treaty 5 Berens Berens R Island Pigeon Pawn Bay Serpent Lake Pigeon River 13A !. Lake Asinkaanumevatt Pigeon Point .! Kacheposit Horseshoe !. Berens R Kamaskawak Lake Pigeon R !. !. Pauingassi Commissioner Assineweetasataypawin Island First Nation .! Bradburn R. Catfish Point .! Ridley White Beaver R Berens River Catfish .! .! Lake Kettle Falls Fishing .! Lake Windigo Wadhope Flour Point Little Grand Lake Rapids Who opee .! Douglas Harb our Round Lake Lake Moar .! Lake Kanikopak Point Little Grand Pigeon River Little Grand Rapids 14 Bradbury R Dogskin River .! Jackhead R a p i d s Viking St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lampreys of the St. Joseph River Drainage in Northern Indiana, with an Emphasis on the Chestnut Lamprey (Ichthyomyzon Castaneus)
    2015. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 124(1):26–31 DOI: LAMPREYS OF THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER DRAINAGE IN NORTHERN INDIANA, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE CHESTNUT LAMPREY (ICHTHYOMYZON CASTANEUS) Philip A. Cochran and Scott E. Malotka1: Biology Department, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, 700 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987 USA Daragh Deegan: City of Elkhart Public Works and Utilities, Elkhart, IN 46516 USA ABSTRACT. This study was initiated in response to concern about parasitism by lampreys on trout in the Little Elkhart River of the St. Joseph River drainage in northern Indiana. Identification of 229 lampreys collected in the St. Joseph River drainage during 1998–2012 revealed 52 American brook lampreys (Lethenteron appendix), one northern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon fossor), 130 adult chestnut lampreys (I. castaneus), five possible adult silver lampreys (I. unicuspis), and 41 Ichthyomyzon ammocoetes. The brook lampreys are non-parasitic and do not feed as adults, so most if not all parasitism on fish in this system is due to chestnut lampreys. Electrofishing surveys in the Little Elkhart River in August 2013 indicated that attached chestnut lampreys and lamprey marks were most common on the larger fishes [trout (Salmonidae), suckers (Catostomidae), and carp (Cyprinidae)] at each of three sites. This is consistent with the known tendency for parasitic lampreys to select larger hosts. Trout in the Little Elkhart River may be more vulnerable to chestnut lamprey attacks because they are relatively large compared to alternative hosts such as suckers. Plots of chestnut lamprey total length versus date of capture revealed substantial variability on any given date.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Asatiwisipe Aki Management Plan – Poplar River First Nation
    May 2011 ASATIWISIPE AKI MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT May, 2011 Poplar River First Nation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND SPECIAL THANKS benefit of our community. She has been essential to documenting our history and traditional use and occupancy. The most important acknowledgement goes to our ancestors who loved and cherished this land and cared for it for centuries to ensure all Thanks go to the Province of Manitoba for financial assistance and to future generations would have life. Their wisdom continues to guide us the staff of Manitoba Conservation for their assistance and support. today in our struggles to keep the land in its natural beauty as it was created. We are very grateful to all of our funders and particularly to the Metcalf Foundation for its support and for believing in the importance of a The development and completion of the Asatiwisipe Aki Lands Lands Management Plan for our community. We would also like to thank Management Plan has occurred because of the collective efforts of many. the Canadian Boreal Initiative for their support. Our Elders have been the driving force for guidance, direction and motivation for this project and it is their wisdom, knowledge, and Meegwetch experience that we have captured within the pages of our Plan. Our Steering Committee of Elders, youth, Band staff and Council, and other community members have worked tirelessly to review and provide Poplar River First Nation feedback on the many maps, text and other technical materials that have Land Management Plan Project been produced as part of this process. Community Team Members We, the Anishinabek of Poplar River First Nation, have been fortunate Thanks go to the following people for their time, energy and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the Period 2002 to 2012
    Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the period 2002 to 2012 The following list identifies the RHAs and RHA Districts in Manitoba between the period 2002 and 2012. The 11 RHAs are listed using major headings with numbers and include the MCHP - Manitoba Health codes that identify them. RHA Districts are listed under the RHA heading and include the Municipal codes that identify them. Changes / modifications to these definitions and the use of postal codes in definitions are noted where relevant. 1. CENTRAL (A - 40) Note: In the fall of 2002, Central changed their districts, going from 8 to 9 districts. The changes are noted below, beside the appropriate district area. Seven Regions (A1S) (* 2002 changed code from A8 to A1S *) '063' - Lakeview RM '166' - Westbourne RM '167' - Gladstone Town '206' - Alonsa RM 'A18' - Sandy Bay FN Cartier/SFX (A1C) (* 2002 changed name from MacDonald/Cartier, and code from A4 to A1C *) '021' - Cartier RM '321' - Headingley RM '127' - St. Francois Xavier RM Portage (A1P) (* 2002 changed code from A7 to A1P *) '090' - Macgregor Village '089' - North Norfolk RM (* 2002 added area from Seven Regions district *) '098' - Portage La Prairie RM '099' - Portage La Prairie City 'A33' - Dakota Tipi FN 'A05' - Dakota Plains FN 'A04' - Long Plain FN Carman (A2C) (* 2002 changed code from A2 to A2C *) '034' - Carman Town '033' - Dufferin RM '053' - Grey RM '112' - Roland RM '195' - St. Claude Village '158' - Thompson RM 1 Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area
    [Show full text]
  • Directory – Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba
    Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba A directory of groups and programs organized by or for First Nations, Inuit and Metis people Community Development Corporation Manual I 1 INDIGENOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN MANITOBA A Directory of Groups and Programs Organized by or for First Nations, Inuit and Metis People Compiled, edited and printed by Indigenous Inclusion Directorate Manitoba Education and Training and Indigenous Relations Manitoba Indigenous and Municipal Relations ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The directory of Indigenous organizations is designed as a useful reference and resource book to help people locate appropriate organizations and services. The directory also serves as a means of improving communications among people. The idea for the directory arose from the desire to make information about Indigenous organizations more available to the public. This directory was first published in 1975 and has grown from 16 pages in the first edition to more than 100 pages in the current edition. The directory reflects the vitality and diversity of Indigenous cultural traditions, organizations, and enterprises. The editorial committee has made every effort to present accurate and up-to-date listings, with fax numbers, email addresses and websites included whenever possible. If you see any errors or omissions, or if you have updated information on any of the programs and services included in this directory, please call, fax or write to the Indigenous Relations, using the contact information on the
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Lessons About Lampreys Don Orth
    Learning Lessons about Lampreys Don Orth 11 American Currents Vol. 43, No. 3 LEARNING LESSONS ABOUT LAMPREYS Don Orth Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, Virginia Lampreys are simple fish that leave me with many ques- tiative emerged. Will the Pacific Lamprey ever recover? The tions. Lampreys and hagfishes are genetically very similar Lost Fish movie tells an all too familiar story (Freshwaters and represent the oldest living groups of vertebrates (Fig- Illustrated 2015) of the loss of important fish populations ure 1). These two lineages of Chordates arose well before the before scientists even have a chance to discover their distri- appearance of jawed fishes. Lampreys and hagfish persisted butions and uniqueness (Carim et al. 2017; Wade et al. 2018). through at least four of five mass extinction events on Earth. Joni Mitchell’s lyrics from “Big Yellow Taxi” seem appropri- How did they survive when most other marine organisms ate here. perished? What does their presence today indicate? “Don’t it always seem to go Studies of evolutionary history tell us that the appear- That you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone ance of the cranium, eyes, pineal gland, inner ear, olfactory They paved paradise rosettes, lateral line, large brain, and muscular heart, were And put up a parking lot” first evident in the lamprey. In fact, the body form of lam- A common genus of lampreys in eastern USA drainages preys is essentially the same as a 360 million-year-old fos- is Ichthyomyzon, which includes six species. Ichthyomyzon sil lamprey (Gess et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Stakeholders in Resource Development Or Protection of Human Health
    REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS IN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OR PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH In this section: First Nations and First Nations Organizations ...................................................... 1 Tribal Council Environmental Health Officers (EHO’s) ......................................... 8 Government Agencies with Roles in Human Health .......................................... 10 Health Canada Environmental Health Officers – Manitoba Region .................... 14 Manitoba Government Departments and Branches .......................................... 16 Industrial Permits and Licensing ........................................................................ 16 Active Large Industrial and Commercial Companies by Sector........................... 23 Agricultural Organizations ................................................................................ 31 Workplace Safety .............................................................................................. 39 Governmental and Non-Governmental Environmental Organizations ............... 41 First Nations and First Nations Organizations 1 | P a g e REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS FIRST NATIONS AND FIRST NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS Berens River First Nation Box 343, Berens River, MB R0B 0A0 Phone: 204-382-2265 Birdtail Sioux First Nation Box 131, Beulah, MB R0H 0B0 Phone: 204-568-4545 Black River First Nation Box 220, O’Hanley, MB R0E 1K0 Phone: 204-367-8089 Bloodvein First Nation General Delivery, Bloodvein, MB R0C 0J0 Phone: 204-395-2161 Brochet (Barrens Land) First Nation General Delivery,
    [Show full text]