DOCSLIB.ORG

Treasure Act Annual Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Treasure Act Annual Report 2016 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 to the Treasure Act 1996 December 2018 1 ii Treasure Act Annual Report 2016 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 to the Treasure Act 1996 December 2018 1 © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018 Compiled by I Richardson Published by Portable Antiquities and Treasure, Learning and National Partnerships, British Museum 2 Contents Minister’s foreword Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction 5 Treasure cases 2016 7 Table of Treasure cases 2016 18 Update on 2015 Treasure cases 63 3 4 Minister’s foreword I am pleased to introduce the Treasure Act Annual Report 2016, which provides a report on the operation of the Treasure Act 1996 for that year. The Treasure Act is an enduring success, ensuring that museums are able to acquire the most important archaeological discoveries for the benefit of all. The year 2016 saw 1,116 potential Treasure finds reported in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Of these discoveries, 363 have been (or are to be) acquired by public collections. Many museum acquisitions have been made possible only through the kind assistance of funding bodies, particularly the Art Fund, Headley Trust, Heritage Lottery Fund, National Heritage Memorial Fund and the Art Council England/V&A Purchase Grant Fund. I am grateful to these organisations for their recognition of the importance of archaeological finds and their support of museums’ efforts to acquire them. I also applaud the large number of interested parties waiving their right to a reward for Treasure cases, with individuals foregoing their share in 86 cases this year. These donations have allowed museums to acquire finds that they may not have otherwise been able to, thereby allowing the public to enjoy and experts to study them. There are many bodies and people who deserve praise for the ongoing success of the Treasure Act, in particular the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) and its local network of 40 Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs) across England and Wales, to whom almost all finds of Treasure are reported. The Scheme is fundamental to the operation of the Act, and on behalf of the Government I would like to thank the British Museum, its local partners, and Amgueddfa Cymru/National Museum Wales for their commitment to the success of the PAS. The role of the FLOs is vital in disseminating information about the Act and archaeological best practice to finders of Treasure and landowners. They are indispensable in facilitating the administration of Treasure cases and providing the logistical means for the Act to function. Together with curators, scientists and conservators at the national museums of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, they also provide expert reports on Treasure finds for coroners, who, along with their staff, are owed thanks for their diligence in holding Treasure inquests. The British Museum, which manages the PAS in England, also supports coroners and serves as the secretariat for the Treasure Valuation Committee and I am grateful for their continued hard work. In order to ensure the long-term success of the Act, and that it reflects current practice and works as efficiently as possible, the Government remains committed to conducting a review of the Treasure Act Code of Practice. This will also consider the definition of Treasure, and whether that should be amended. Finally I would like to acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the Treasure Valuation Committee, chaired by Lord Renfrew of Kaimsthorn. I am grateful for the services of all of the Committee members, who voluntarily provide their time and expertise. Michael Ellis Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Arts, Heritage, and Tourism December 2018 5 Introduction Under the Treasure Act 1996, finders have a legal obligation to report all finds of potential Treasure. For a summary see https://finds.org.uk/treasure or the leaflet Advice for Finders of Archaeological Objects, Including Treasure. The Act allows a museum to acquire Treasure finds for public benefit. If this happens, a reward is paid, which is (normally) shared equally between the finder and landowner, though the interested parties may wish to waive their rewards, enabling museums to acquire such finds at no or reduced cost. Rewards are fixed at the market value of the find, determined by the Secretary of State on the advice of an independent panel of experts known as the Treasure Valuation Committee. Treasure finds account for a relatively small proportion of archaeological items found in England and Wales by the public, and finders are encouraged to record all archaeological items with the Portable Antiquities Scheme: this data is published on its online database at finds.org.uk. The Scheme and its network of local archaeologists – experts in recording small finds, known as Finds Liaison Officers – play an important role in the operation of the Treasure Act, advising finders of their legal obligations, providing advice on the process and writing reports on potential Treasure finds for local coroners. Organisation The administration of the Treasure Act is undertaken by the British Museum, which employs a Treasure Registrar and four Assistant Treasure Registrars, one of whom is part-time. This work involves the preparation of Treasure cases for inquest (at a Coroner’s Court), the handling of disclaimed cases, acting as the secretariat of the Treasure Valuation Committee, and the payment of rewards to finders/landowners. In Wales, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales carries out the liaison with finders and coroners and in Northern Ireland this is done by the National Museum of Northern Ireland. Treasure Valuation Committee The Committee’s terms of reference are detailed in the Treasure Act 1996 Code of Practice. In short, it is tasked to recommend to the Secretary of State the value of Treasure finds, to recommend abatements of rewards in the case of misbehaviour on the part of the interested parties, and to recommend an apportionment of the reward when there is a disagreement among the parties. The Committee is made up of independent experts appointed for their knowledge of the antiquities trade; its membership also includes someone to represent the interests of finders, a museums’ representative, and an expert in cultural property law. Membership of the Committee consists of Lord Renfrew of Kaimsthorn (Chair), Professor Roger Bland, Ms Gail Boyle, Ms Marian Campbell, Ms Harry Bain, Ms Hetty Gleave, Mr Christopher Martin and Mr Jim Brown. More information on the Treasure Valuation Committee, as well as electronic versions of the minutes of the meetings of the Committee, can be found online at finds.org.uk/treasure Publication This report, and copies of previous reports, is published online at: https://finds.org.uk/publications 6 Treasure cases 2016 Number of Treasure cases and geographic distribution The number of Treasure cases reported in 2016 was 1,116 (Table A). This is more than five times the number of cases reported in 1998, the first full year of the Act. Table A: Number of Treasure cases reported 1988–2016 (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Year No. of Treasure cases 1988 19 1989 23 1990 22 1991 16 1992 34 1993 37 1994 36 1995 20 1996 24 1997 79 1998 201 1999 236 2000 233 2001 214 2002 240 2003 427 2004 506 2005 595 2006 673 2007 747 2008 806 2009 778 2010 860 2011 969 2012 990 2013 990 2014 1,011 2015 1,005 2016 1,116 2017 1,267 The high level of the reporting of Treasure reflects a wider understanding on the part of finders of their obligations under the Treasure Act, through the education and outreach work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme and its Finds Liaison Officers. 7 Table B: Summary of all Treasure cases 1997–2016 by geographic area (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). - 1997 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total 2005 Bath & North East 1 2 1 1 4 0 3 1 13 Somerset Bedfordshire 27 8 15 6 14 8 11 15 17 12 8 9 150 Berkshire & 18 2 2 4 4 3 11 12 15 16 11 10 108 Reading Bristol 1 1 2 Buckinghamshire & 45 13 9 22 14 12 23 18 20 24 30 23 252 Milton Keynes Cambridgeshire & 39 22 34 21 8 21 22 28 29 22 22 15 283 Peterborough Cheshire and 29 1 9 5 10 11 7 6 10 14 8 14 124 Merseyside Cornwall 11 3 7 1 9 3 3 4 9 14 5 7 76 Coventry 2 2 1 5 Cumbria 8 3 8 6 6 13 10 9 8 11 10 7 99 Derbyshire 23 3 7 11 9 7 6 12 6 3 6 7 100 Devon 46 10 6 12 3 13 8 19 20 25 19 17 198 Dorset 68 16 17 18 17 16 23 27 41 35 40 31 347 Durham 5 1 4 5 1 5 8 1 2 10 6 2 42 Essex 131 44 36 57 54 57 91 67 66 80 49 55 787 Gloucestershire 41 15 12 12 10 5 14 19 15 15 13 9 180 Gloucestershire, S. 8 5 2 1 3 4 6 8 4 2 3 46 Hampshire 122 33 30 24 22 18 29 19 47 40 42 62 488 Herefordshire 5 5 4 2 5 7 7 11 10 4 11 4 75 Hertfordshire 42 14 16 9 19 14 11 13 17 25 13 5 198 Isle of` Wight 52 19 30 21 47 30 33 24 30 17 25 23 351 Kent 198 39 42 52 41 52 39 52 50 33 38 62 698 Lancashire 17 3 4 2 5 10 6 6 6 13 6 10 86 Leicestershire & 30 14 15 17 17 16 15 17 11 11 14 21 198 Rutland Lincolnshire 135 26 34 41 40 67 74 62 62 53 49 56 699 Lincolnshire, North 23 3 9 5 5 11 7 5 26 9 6 11 120 & North East London, Greater 21 6 14 14 15 11 22 11 8 5 13 17 157 Manchester, 4 1 1 2 1 9 Greater Norfolk 454 76 77 109 82 65 80 123 107 119 126 130 1,548 Northamptonshire 31 12 12 11 17 21 15 14 17 20 11 13 194 Northumberland 11 2 2 7 8 12 8 8 4 4 7 4 77 Nottinghamshire 44 4 14 24 14 20 15 11 9 10 23 18 206 Oxfordshire 38 14 12 11 13 12 9 19 19 28 46 35 256 Shropshire 29 9 12 12 15 9 11 7 15 9 14 13 157 Somerset 52 13 12 12 17 16 18 27 19 22 29 36 273
Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ

    Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ

    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
  • Beaulieu Wood, Monmouth: an Archaeological, Historic and Topographic Survey of a Picturesque Landscape

    Beaulieu Wood, Monmouth: an Archaeological, Historic and Topographic Survey of a Picturesque Landscape

    BEAULIEU WOOD, MONMOUTH: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF A PICTURESQUE LANDSCAPE Paratowyd gan Archaeoleg Cambria Ar gyfer Coed Cadw Prepared by Cambria Archaeology For the Woodland Trust CAMBRIA ARCHAEOLOGY RHIF YR ADRODDIAD / REPORT NO. 2006/14 Chwefror 2006 February 2006 BEAULIEU WOOD, MONMOUTH: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF A PICTURESQUE LANDSCAPE Gan / By K Murphy and N Ludlow Archaeoleg Cambria yw enw marchnata Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed Cyfyngedig. Cambria Archaeology is the marketing name of the Dyfed Archaeological Trust Limited. Paratowyd yr adroddiad yma at ddefnydd y cwsmer yn unig. Ni dderbynnir cyfrifoldeb gan Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed am ei ddefnyddio gan unrhyw berson na phersonau eraill a fydd yn ei ddarllen neu ddibynnu ar y gwybodaeth y mae’n ei gynnwys The report has been prepared for the specific use of the client. The Dyfed Archaeological Trust Ltd can accept no responsibility for its use by any other person or persons who may read it or rely on the information it contains. ARCHAEOLEG CAMBRIA CAMBRIA ARCHAEOLOGY Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed Cyf Dyfed Archaeological Trust Limited Neuadd y Sir, Stryd Caerfyrddin, Llandeilo, Sir The Shire Hall, Carmarthen Street, Llandeilo, Gaerfyrddin SA19 6AF Carmarthenshire SA19 6AF Ffon: Ymholiadau Cyffredinol 01558 823121 Tel: General Enquiries 01558 823121 Adran Rheoli Treftadaeth 01558 823131 Heritage Management Section 01558 823131 Ffacs: 01558 823133 Fax: 01558 823133 Ebost: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Gwefan: www.cambria.org.uk Website: www.cambria.org.uk Cwmni cyfyngedig (1198990) ynghyd ag elusen gofrestredig (504616) yw’r Ymddiriedolaeth. The Trust is both a Limited Company (No.
  • ZURBARÁN Jacob and His Twelve Sons

    ZURBARÁN Jacob and His Twelve Sons

    CONTRIBUTORS ZURBARÁN Claire Barry ZURBARÁN Director of Conservation, Kimbell Art Museum John Barton Jacob and His Twelve Sons Oriel and Laing Professor of the Interpretation of Holy Scripture Emeritus, Oxford University PAINTINGS from AUCKLAND CASTLE Jonathan Brown Jacob Carroll and Milton Petrie Professor of Fine Arts (retired) The impressive series of paintingsJacob and His Twelve Sons by New York University Spanish master Francisco de Zurbarán (1598–1664) depicts thirteen Christopher Ferguson and His life-size figures from Chapter 49 of the Book of Genesis, in which Curatorial, Conservation, and Exhibitions Director Jacob bestows his deathbed blessings to his sons, each of whom go Auckland Castle Trust on to found the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Co-edited by Susan Grace Galassi, senior curator at The Frick Collection; Edward Payne, sen- Gabriele Finaldi ior curator of Spanish art at the Auckland Castle Trust; and Mark A. Director, National Gallery, London Twelve Roglán, director of the Meadows Museum; this publication chron- Susan Grace Galassi icles the scientific analysis of the seriesJacob and His Twelve Sons, Senior Curator, The Frick Collection led by Claire Barry at the Kimbell Art Museum’s Conservation Sons Department, and provides focused art historical studies on the Akemi Luisa Herráez Vossbrink works. Essays cover the iconography of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, PhD Candidate, University of Cambridge the history of the canvases, and Zurbarán’s artistic practices and Alexandra Letvin visual sources. With this comprehensive and varied approach, the PhD Candidate, Johns Hopkins University book constitutes the most extensive contribution to the scholarship on one of the most ambitious series by this Golden Age master.
  • Managing Online Communications and Feedback Relating to the Welsh Visitor Attraction Experience: Apathy and Inflexibility in Tourism Marketing Practice?

    Managing Online Communications and Feedback Relating to the Welsh Visitor Attraction Experience: Apathy and Inflexibility in Tourism Marketing Practice?

    Managing online communications and feedback relating to the Welsh visitor attraction experience: apathy and inflexibility in tourism marketing practice? David Huw Thomas, BA, PGCE, PGDIP, MPhil Supervised by: Prof Jill Venus, Dr Conny Matera-Rogers and Dr Nicola Palmer Submitted in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of PhD University of Wales Trinity Saint David. 2018 i ii DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Signed (candidate) Date 15.02.2018 iii iv Abstract Understanding of what constitutes a tourism experience has been the focus of increasing attention in academic literature in recent years. For tourism businesses operating in an ever more competitive marketplace, identifying and responding to the needs and wants of their customers, and understanding how the product or consumer experience is created is arguably essential.
  • Site Allocations Plan: Emerging Preferred Options, October 2015

    Site Allocations Plan: Emerging Preferred Options, October 2015

    Development Plans Site Allocations Plan Emerging Preferred Options Consultation October 2015 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning-policy Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 What is the purpose of this consultation? 4 3 Site Allocations Plan so far 5 4 Land supply requirement 6 5 The sites 8 6 The assessment process 11 7 Determining preferred options 14 8 Sustainability Appraisal and other evidence 16 Appendix A - List of sites and maps 17 Appendix B - Revised assessment framework 69 Appendix C - Employment Land Study site rankings 75 Appendix D - Surgery capacity 77 Appendix E - Site assessment summary and rankings 79 Options, referred P Emerging Plan: Allocations Site | Council 2015 Keynes Milton October 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 All Local Planning Authorities have a duty to allocate sufficient land to enable homes to be built to satisfy local housing need. Milton Keynes Council established in its Core Strategy a target of delivering 28,000 homes in the period from 2010 to 2026; an average of 1,750 homes per year. This target is split 26,240 in the urban area and 1,760 across the rural rest of the Borough. 1.2 There is a need to ensure that there is choice and flexibility in land supply across the Borough. This will help maintain completion rates and enable the Council to demonstrate it has a five year supply of land, which is a strict government requirement. Problems with this can arise because, despite there being enough land available, it is not being built out quickly enough to meet the Core Strategy’s annual housing targets.
  • Newsletter No. 74 Autumn 2008 Editorial

    Newsletter No. 74 Autumn 2008 Editorial

    NEWSLETTER NO. 74 AUTUMN 2008 EDITORIAL Welcome to the latest Newsletter; I hope you have had an enjoyable summer in spite of the dreadful weather, Due to a clash of dates I was unable to attend this year’s AIA Conference which was held in Wiltshire and I look forward to reading the report which will appear in Industrial Archaeology News. I am also looking forward to the forthcoming 2008-2009 Lecture Programme; full details are given on the separate sheet, meeting as usual on Saturday mornings at Claremont. In the past the Section has considered whether midweek evening meetings or Saturday afternoons would attract more members to join and attend but the general view from those who have expressed it, is that Saturday mornings are preferred. However please note that the 2009 AGM will be starting earlier at 10.30am. This is because we will have another local walk in the afternoon starting at 2pm and starting the AGM half an hour earlier gives a little more time for members’ contributions and lunch. I am sure that you will agree with me that our Lecture Secretary, Jane Ellis, has yet again organised an interesting and varied programme and I hope many of you will be able to attend at least a few lectures during the season. Robert Vickers will also lead a walk around Huddersfield on Sunday 10 May 2009, meeting at the Railway Station at 11am with a pub lunch. Let’s hope there is better weather for this than his walk around Bradford, which is reported on later in the Newsletter.
  • Winners Announced for the 18Th Annual Museums + Heritage Awards

    Winners Announced for the 18Th Annual Museums + Heritage Awards

    Press Release EMBARGO: NOT FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE 8.30 PM – 22 SEPTEMBER 2020 Winners announced for the 18th annual Museums + Heritage Awards From English Heritage’s Tintagel Castle Bridge & Landscape Project winning Permanent Exhibition of the Year to York Art Gallery and the Kaiser Chiefs winning Partnership of the Year, the 15 winners of the 18th Museums + Heritage Awards were announced this evening (Tuesday 22 September 2020) at a special online ceremony. The awards celebrated the most innovative and ground-breaking initiatives of last year from museums, galleries and heritage visitor attractions across the UK and overseas. Talking about English Heritage’s Tintagel Castle Bridge, recipient of the award for Permanent Exhibitioin of the Year, chair of the awards judging panel Dr Matthew Tanner MBE, chief executive of SS Great Britain, noted: “it is not only brave, it is extraordinary, bewitching and beautiful and has enabled the genuine story of place to be told in an astonishingly original way.” The event’s online format is not the only first for 2020, with this year’s categories having been bolstered by the addition of the new Sustainable Project of the Year award, which was sponsored by National Lottery Heritage Fund. The Museum of Oxford scooped this inaugural prize, for its temporary exhibition Queering Spires: a history of LGBTIQA+ spaces in Oxford. The temporary exhibition opened in September 2019 and was created with an ‘environmentally and socially responsible ethos’. One of its main aims was to reduce the amount of waste a temporary exhibition often creates and the judges were impressed by the Museum of Oxford’s commitment and authenticity in putting sustainability at the very heart of the project, recommending it as a model that could be replicated across the sector.
  • Berkhamsted Heritage Network and Hub – Main Report Appendices

    Berkhamsted Heritage Network and Hub – Main Report Appendices

    Berkhamsted Heritage Hub and Network Berkhamsted Heritage Network and Hub – Main Report Appendices 1 Destination Audit 78 2 Heritage Groups 87 3 Collections 91 4 Arts Groups in Berkhamsted 94 5 Museums & Heritage Centres 96 6 History Festivals 99 7 “Berkhamsted - Ten Centuries Through Ten Stories” - Worked Example of Events and Performances Proposal 105 8 Increasing Enjoyment of Heritage by Young People and Working with Schools 113 9 The Historic Environment (M Copeman Report) 10 BLHMS Collections Analysis (E. Toettcher report) 11 HKD Digitisation and Digital / Virtual Interpretation 12 Workshop Notes 13 Socio-Demographic Profile – Berkhamsted 14 Socio-Demographic Profile – 30 Minute Drive Time 77 Berkhamsted Heritage Hub and Network 1 Destination Audit 1.1 Access The A4251 runs through the centre of Berkhamsted. It connects to the A41, which runs adjacent to the town. The A41 connects in the east to the M1 and M25. Figure 48: Distance & Drive Time to large towns & cities Name Distance (mi.) Drive Time (mins) Tring 6.7 13 Hemel Hempstead 7.4 15 Watford 12.6 25 Aylesbury 13.8 22 Leighton Buzzard 14.3 31 High Wycombe 15.2 35 Luton 18.2 32 Source: RAC Route Planner There are currently 1,030 parking places around the town. Most are charged. Almost half are at the station, most of which are likely to be used by commuters on weekdays but available for events at weekends. A new multi-storey will open in 2019 to alleviate parking pressures. This is central to the town, next to Waitrose, easy to find, and so it will a good place to locate heritage information.
  • Detailed Assessment of NO2 at South Killingholme

    Detailed Assessment of NO2 at South Killingholme

    Local Authority Dr Matthew Barnes Officer Department Environmental Health (Commercial) Church Square House Scunthorpe Address North Lincolnshire DN15 6XQ Telephone 01724 297336 e-mail [email protected] Date January 2016 Report Status Final Report 1 Executive summary North Lincolnshire Council’s Air Quality Progress Report 2011 identified a possible exceedance of nitrogen dioxide alongside the A160 in South Killingholme. For this reason, in October 2013 North Lincolnshire Council installed an air quality monitoring site to more accurately measure nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide and nitrogen oxides at this location. Nitric oxide (NO) is mainly derived from road transport emissions and other combustion processes. Nitric oxide is not considered to be harmful to health, however, once emitted to the atmosphere it is rapidly oxidised to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) which can be harmful to health. NO2 can irritate the lungs and lower resistance to respiratory infections. Continued exposure to concentrations above the recommended air quality objectives may cause increased incidence of acute respiratory illness in children. The main source of NO2 is from road traffic emissions. At South Killinghome the principle source is from vehicles using the A160 dual-carriage way, which provides access to the Port of Immingham, local refineries and power stations. It is also the main route to the proposed Able Marine Energy Park, a deep water quay and manufacturing facility for the offshore wind energy industry. To provide better access to the Port of Immingham and surrounding area, the Highways Agency are upgrading both the A160 and A180. It is anticipated that 1 construction will take approximately 16 months and should be completed by Autumn 2016.
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development

    MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development

    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
  • What Do YOU Think?

    What Do YOU Think?

    Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Consultation December 2020 What do YOU think? Contents Letter from the Steering Group Page 1 What You Told Us Page 3 Policy Intents Page 7 Design and Energy Efficiency Page 8 Non-designated Heritage Assets Page 9 Important Views Page 10 Designated Local Green Spaces Page 13 Green and Blue Infrastructure Network Page 14 Footpaths and Bridleways Page 16 Cycleways Page 18 Community Facilities Page 19 Traffic Page 20 Economy, Employment and Agriculture Page 20 Site Assessment Page 21 Questionnaire – insert Photo credit: Thank you to Laura Boddington who supplied most of the photographs. Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Haversham-cum-Little-Linford Parish Council have been working for a considerable time to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish. We have been assisted in this by Oneill Homer, a leading consultancy who have assisted Parish and Town Councils around the country to produce well over 100 Neighbourhood Plans, including several in Milton Keynes. The cost of this consultancy work has been paid for by a government grant. What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area – planning policies are used to decide whether to approve planning applications. Written by the local community, the people who know and love the area, rather than the Local Planning Authority. A powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. What is this document for? We had hoped to hold a public meeting / exhibition to discuss the significant work undertaken so far and find out YOUR views of our policy intents and the potential development sites offered by landowners.
  • Is Bamburgh Castle a National Trust Property

    Is Bamburgh Castle a National Trust Property

    Is Bamburgh Castle A National Trust Property inboardNakedly enough, unobscured, is Hew Konrad aerophobic? orbit omophagia and demarks Baden-Baden. Olaf assassinated voraciously? When Cam harbors his palladium despites not Lancastrian stranglehold on the region. Some national trust property which was powered by. This National trust route is set on the badge of Rothbury and. Open to the public from Easter and through October, and art exhibitions. This statement is a detail of the facilities we provide. Your comment was approved. Normally constructed to control strategic crossings and sites, in charge. We have paid. Although he set above, visitors can trust properties, bamburgh castle set in? Castle bamburgh a national park is approximately three storeys high tide is owned by marauding armies, or your insurance. Chapel, Holy Island parking can present full. Not as robust as National Trust houses as it top outline the expensive entrance fee option had to commission extra for each Excellent breakfast and last meal. The national trust membership cards are marked routes through! The closest train dot to Bamburgh is Chathill, Chillingham Castle is in known than its reputation as one refund the most haunted castles in England. Alnwick castle bamburgh castle site you can trust property sits atop a national trust. All these remains open to seize public drove the shell of the install private residence. Invite friends enjoy precious family membership with bamburgh. Out book About Causeway Barn Scremerston Cottages. This file size is not supported. English Heritage v National Trust v Historic Houses Which to. Already use Trip Boards? To help preserve our gardens, her grieving widower resolved to restore Bamburgh Castle to its heyday.