DOCSLIB.ORG

Malayalam Morphosyntax: Inflectional Features and Their Acquisition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Malayalam Morphosyntax: Inflectional Features and Their Acquisition Malayalam Morphosyntax: Inflectional Features and their Acquisition Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gayathri G Roll No. 134083003 Supervisor: Prof. Vaijayanthi M Sarma Department of Humanities & Social Sciences INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY 2019 For Priya … Abstract Malayalam, which belongs to the South­Dravidian language family, is an agglutinative language with rich inflectional morphology. The aim of the thesis is to analyse the grammar and acqui­ sition of Malayalam verbal inflections (tense, aspect and mood) and nominal inflections (case, number, and gender). Within the larger discussion of inflectional morphology and its acqui­ sition, particular attention is paid to two complex morphological processes, a) the past tense formation of verbs and b) case assignment of subjects and objects. In particular, the thesis will show the following: a) that the past tense marker selection is determined by different grammatical principles in underived and derived stems; specifically, phonotactics in the former and the lexical feature of transitivity in the latter; b) that the da­ tive nominals of a class of predicates (variously labelled experiencer or dative subject or psych predicates) are in fact subjects using an array of empirical tests involving binding, control, ac­ cusative marking, and predicate alternation; and c) that inflections for number and object case rest on lexical features of the noun (stem) and the allomorphy is governed by these featural requirements. In looking at the developing grammar in the two subjects, the thesis will show that Malayalam inflectional grammar has quite direct consequences for the acquisition of inflec­ tional morphology. Specifically, acquisition proceeds unobstructed when the mode of selection is phonological and offers more challenges when the mode of selection is morphological, i.e., when the selection depends on the learning of the lexical or grammatical features of the noun and verb stems. Thus, using the interplay between acquisition and the grammatical description, we es­ tablish that in addition to the established factors that guide acquisition, mode of selection of an inflection plays a key role in determining the relative ease/difficulty in the acquisition of in­ flectional morphology. This follows quite neatly from the fact that children are phonologically competent even before much language is produced and that this module­competence could fa­ cilitate the acquisition of morphology. The thesis will argue that this is indeed the case. vii Contents Abstract vii Contents ix List of Figures xiii List of Tables xv List of Abbreviations xix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Children and Language .............................. 1 1.2 Inflections in Universal Grammar ........................ 4 1.3 Dravidian Languages ............................... 7 1.3.1 Grammatical Features of Dravidian Languages ............. 9 1.4 Malayalam and its Linguistic Features ...................... 12 1.5 Organisation of the Thesis ............................ 16 1.6 Contributions of the Thesis ............................ 22 2 Contextualising Inflectional Development 23 2.1 Acquiring Inflections ............................... 23 2.2 Major Theoretical Models on Inflectional Acquisition .............. 25 2.2.1 Phonological Theories on Inflectional Development .......... 25 2.2.2 Morphological Models on Inflectional Acquisition: Rule vs Analogy or Dual­Route vs. Single­Route Models .................. 28 2.2.3 Syntactic Theories on Inflectional Development ............. 29 2.3 Affix­Learning vs Parameter Setting ....................... 40 ix x Contents 2.3.1 Factors that Influence the Acquisition of Inflectional Morphemes ... 40 2.3.2 Parameter Setting and the Acquisition of Inflections .......... 42 2.4 Different Approaches to the Development of Inflections ............. 43 3 Subjects and Method 47 3.1 Longitudinal Data ................................. 47 3.1.1 Error Analysis .............................. 48 3.1.2 Morphological Development ....................... 51 3.1.3 Productivity ................................ 56 3.2 Cross­Sectional Data ............................... 57 4 Characteristics of Inflectional Selection in Malayalam 59 4.1 Introduction .................................... 59 4.2 Malayalam Inflections and Agglutination .................... 60 4.3 Phonotactic Constraints on Inflectional Affixes ................. 60 4.4 Phonological vs Morphological Selection .................... 67 4.5 Acquisition and Mode of Affix Selection ..................... 68 5 The Grammar and Acquisition of Malayalam Verbal Inflections 69 5.1 Verbal Inflections in Malayalam ......................... 69 5.2 Acquisition of Verbal Inflections ......................... 74 5.3 Acquisition of Malayalam TAM inflections ................... 77 5.3.1 Tense ................................... 78 5.3.2 Aspect .................................. 83 5.3.3 Mood ................................... 85 5.3.4 Errors in TAM marking ......................... 91 5.4 Verbal Inflections: Summary ........................... 92 6 Past Tense Morphology and Acquisition 93 6.1 Introduction .................................... 93 6.2 Past Tense of Underived Verbs .......................... 96 6.3 Past Tense of Derived Verbs ........................... 97 6.4 Intermediate Summary .............................. 107 6.5 Interface Patterns in Affixed Verbs and Phonological Levelling ......... 108 Contents xi 6.6 Acquisition of Past Tense ............................. 110 6.6.1 Production of the past tense affix ­i ................... 112 6.6.2 Production of the Past Tense suffixes ­t̪ u and ­n̪ t̪ u ............ 113 6.6.3 Errors and Error Analysis ........................ 117 6.7 Conclusion .................................... 122 7 The Grammar and Acquisition of Malayalam Nominal Inflections 123 7.1 Malayalam Nominal Inflections ......................... 123 7.2 Cross­Linguistic Patterns in the Acquisition of Nominal Inflections ....... 132 7.3 Acquisition of Malayalam Nominal Inflections ................. 135 7.3.1 Case .................................... 136 7.3.2 Gender .................................. 145 7.3.3 Number .................................. 148 7.4 Nominal Inflection: Errors in the Data ...................... 153 7.5 Summary ..................................... 160 8 Dative Subject Marking in Malayalam 163 8.1 Introduction .................................... 163 8.2 Structure of Dative Subject Constructions .................... 185 8.3 Acquisition of Dative Subjects .......................... 195 8.3.1 Dative Marking in the Data ........................ 199 8.4 Errors in the Production of Datives ........................ 208 8.5 Conclusion .................................... 214 9 Conclusions and Further Research 215 A Linguistic Profiles of the Subjects’ Parents 225 B Examples of Discarded Items from the Transcripts 227 C Inflectional Paradigms in the Transcripts 229 D Past Tense Forms in the Transcripts 231 E Dative Subject Predicates in the Transcripts 237 xii Contents F Dative­Assigning Modal Predicates in the Transcripts 239 References 241 Acknowledgements 251 List of Figures 1.1 Family tree of Dravidian languages. (Krishnamurti, 2003, p. 21) ........ 8 2.1 Major inflectional acquisition models. ...................... 24 2.2 Different approaches to the development of inflections. ............. 44 3.1 Sample picture of the ELAN file with data organised at different levels. .... 48 3.2 MLUs of subjects. ................................. 53 3.3 A’s vocabulary count. ............................... 55 3.4 H’s vocabulary count. ............................... 55 3.5 A’s inflectional production. ............................ 56 3.6 H’s inflectional production. ............................ 56 5.1 TAM inflections ­ Present ­un̪ n̪ u. ......................... 80 5.2 TAM inflections ­ Future ­um. .......................... 81 5.3 TAM inflections ­ Perfective ­iʈʈɨ. ......................... 84 5.4 TAM inflections ­ Imperfective ­uka + aaɳɨ. ................... 85 5.5 TAM inflections ­ Imperative ­oo. ........................ 86 5.6 TAM inflections ­ Imperative ­ee. ........................ 87 5.7 TAM inflections ­ Imperative ­aan. ........................ 88 5.8 Production of bare imperatives. .......................... 89 5.9 TAM inflections ­ Optative ­aʈʈe. ......................... 90 6.1 Malayalam verb stems. .............................. 111 6.2 TAM inflections ­ Past ­i. ............................. 113 6.3 TAM inflections ­ Past ­t̪ u. ............................ 114 6.4 TAM inflections ­ Past ­n̪ t̪ u. ........................... 115 xiii xiv List of Figures 7.1 Nominal inflections ­ Accusative ­e. ....................... 137 7.2 Nominal inflections ­ Accusative ­ne. ...................... 138 7.3 Nominal inflections ­ Dative ­nɨ. ......................... 139 7.4 Nominal inflections ­ Dative ­kkɨ. ........................ 139 7.5 Nominal inflections ­ Genitive ­nte. ....................... 140 7.6 Nominal inflections ­ Genitive ­ʈe. ........................ 141 7.7 Nominal inflections ­ Sociative ­ooʈɨ and ­nooʈɨ. ................. 142 7.8 Nominal inflections ­ Locative ­il. ........................ 144 7.9 Nominal inflections ­ Locative ­at̪ t̪ ɨ. ....................... 144 7.10 Nominal inflections ­ Masculine ­an. ....................... 147 7.11 Nominal inflections ­ Feminine ­i. ........................ 149 7.12 Nominal inflections ­ Plural ­maar. .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Not So Quirky: on Subject Case in Ice- Landic1
    5 Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Ice- landic 1 JÓHANNES GÍSLI JÓNSSON 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of subject case in Icelandic, extending and refining the observations of Jónsson (1997-1998) and some earlier work on this topic. It will be argued that subject case in Icelandic is more predictable from lexical semantics than previous studies have indicated (see also Mohanan 1994 and Narasimhan 1998 for a similar conclusion about Hindi). This is in line with the work of Jónsson (2000) and Maling (2002) who discuss various semantic generalizations about case as- signment to objects in Icelandic. This paper makes two major claims. First, there are semantic restrictions on non-nominative subjects in Icelandic which go far beyond the well- known observation that such subjects cannot be agents. It will be argued that non-nominative case is unavailable to all kinds of subjects that could be described as agent-like, including subjects of certain psych-verbs and intransitive verbs of motion and change of state. 1 I would like to thank audiences in Marburg, Leeds, York and Reykjavík and three anony- mous reviewers for useful comments. This study was supported by grants from the Icelandic Science Fund (Vísindasjóður) and the University of Iceland Research Fund (Rannsóknasjóður HÍ). New Perspectives in Case Theory. Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds.). Copyright © 2003, CSLI Publications. 129 130 / JOHANNES GISLI JONSSON Second, the traditional dichotomy between structural and lexical case is insufficient in that two types of lexical case must be recognized: truly idio- syncratic case and what we might call semantic case.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Challenges for Polysynthetic Languages
    Computational Modeling of Polysynthetic Languages Judith L. Klavans, Ph.D. US Army Research Laboratory 2800 Powder Mill Road Adelphi, Maryland 20783 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Given advances in computational linguistic analysis of complex languages using Machine Learning as well as standard Finite State Transducers, coupled with recent efforts in language revitalization, the time was right to organize a first workshop to bring together experts in language technology and linguists on the one hand with language practitioners and revitalization experts on the other. This one-day meeting provides a promising forum to discuss new research on polysynthetic languages in combination with the needs of linguistic communities where such languages are written and spoken. Finally, this overview article summarizes the papers to be presented, along with goals and purpose. Motivation Polysynthetic languages are characterized by words that are composed of multiple morphemes, often to the extent that one long word can express the meaning contained in a multi-word sentence in lan- guage like English. To illustrate, consider the following example from Inuktitut, one of the official languages of the Territory of Nunavut in Canada. The morpheme -tusaa- (shown in boldface below) is the root, and all the other morphemes are synthetically combined with it in one unit.1 (1) tusaa-tsia-runna-nngit-tu-alu-u-junga hear-well-be.able-NEG-DOER-very-BE-PART.1.S ‘I can't hear very well.’ Kabardian (Circassian), from the Northwest Caucasus, also shows this phenomenon, with the root -še- shown in boldface below: (2) wə-q’ə-d-ej-z-γe-še-ž’e-f-a-te-q’əm 2SG.OBJ-DIR-LOC-3SG.OBJ-1SG.SUBJ-CAUS-lead-COMPL-POTENTIAL-PAST-PRF-NEG ‘I would not let you bring him right back here.’ Polysynthetic languages are spoken all over the globe and are richly represented among Native North and South American families.
    [Show full text]
  • From Volition to Obligation: a Force-Involved Change Through Subjectification
    Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 42.2 (November 2016): 65-97 DOI: 10.6241/concentric.ling.42.2.03 From Volition to Obligation: A Force-Involved Change through Subjectification Ting-Ting Christina Hsu Chung Yuan Christian University This paper aims to show the importance of subjectification (Traugott 1989, Langacker 1990) for the emergence of deontic modals with the development of the deontic modal ai3 in Southern Min. Materials under examination are early texts of Southern Min in the playscripts of Li Jing Ji ‘The Legend of Litchi Mirror’ and a collection of folk stories in contemporary Southern Min. The deontic modal ai3 in Southern Min is assumed to have developed from the intentional ai3 through subjectification on the basis of their parallel force-dynamic structures which represent the preservation of their force interactions throughout the development of the deontic modal ai3 (Talmy 2000). Because subjectifica- tion is also known to contribute to the emergence of epistemic modals (Traugott 1989, Sweetser 1990), it can then be seen as a general process through which force-involved modals can emerge. Key words: subjectification, force dynamics, volition, deontic modal, intentional verb 1. Introduction The structure of human language is reflective of human cognition (Berlin & Kay 1969, Sweetser 1990) and determined by the perceptual system (Fillmore 1971, Clark 1973). The development of modals is also affected by cognitive processes. One of these processes is subjectification, which increases speakers’ involvement in the proposition or grounding of a predication (Traugott 1989, Langacker 1990). Subjec- tification is assumed to contribute to the emergence of epistemic modals since a speaker’s perspectives or roles are specifically important for epistemic modals (Sweetser 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • “Today's Morphology Is Yeatyerday's Syntax”
    MOTHER TONGUE Journal of the Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory • Issue XXI • 2016 From North to North West: How North-West Caucasian Evolved from North Caucasian Viacheslav A. Chirikba Abkhaz State University, Sukhum, Republic of Abkhazia The comparison of (North-)West Caucasian with (North-)East Caucasian languages suggests that early Proto-West Caucasian underwent a fundamental reshaping of its phonological, morphological and syntactic structures, as a result of which it became analytical, with elementary inflection and main grammatical roles being expressed by lexical means, word order and probably also by tones. The subsequent development of compounding and incorporation resulted in a prefixing polypersonal polysynthetic agglutinative language type typical for modern West Caucasian languages. The main evolutionary line from a North Caucasian dialect close to East Caucasian to modern West Caucasian languages was thus from agglutinative to the analytical language-type, due to a near complete loss of inflection, and then to the agglutinative polysynthetic type. Although these changes blurred the genetic relationship between West Caucasian and East Caucasian languages, however, this can be proven by applying standard procedures of comparative-historical linguistics. 1. The West Caucasian languages.1 The West Caucasian (WC), or Abkhazo-Adyghean languages constitute a branch of the North Caucasian (NC) linguistic family, which consists of five languages: Abkhaz and Abaza (the Abkhaz sub-group), Adyghe and Kabardian (the Circassian sub-group), and Ubykh. The traditional habitat of these languages is the Western Caucasus, where they are still spoken, with the exception of the extinct Ubykh. Typologically, the WC languages represent a rather idiosyncratic linguistic type not occurring elsewhere in Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the “Isolating Protolanguage Hypothesis” in the Evolution of Morphology Author(S): Jaïmé Dubé Proceedings
    Reconsidering the “isolating protolanguage hypothesis” in the evolution of morphology Author(s): Jaïmé Dubé Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2013), pp. 76-90 Editors: Chundra Cathcart, I-Hsuan Chen, Greg Finley, Shinae Kang, Clare S. Sandy, and Elise Stickles Please contact BLS regarding any further use of this work. BLS retains copyright for both print and screen forms of the publication. BLS may be contacted via http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society is published online via eLanguage, the Linguistic Society of America's digital publishing platform. Reconsidering the Isolating Protolanguage Hypothesis in the Evolution of Morphology1 JAÏMÉ DUBÉ Université de Montréal 1 Introduction Much recent work on the evolution of language assumes explicitly or implicitly that the original language was without morphology. Under this assumption, morphology is merely a consequence of language use: affixal morphology is the result of the agglutination of free words, and morphophonemic (MP) alternations arise through the morphologization of once regular phonological processes. This hypothesis is based on at least two questionable assumptions: first, that the methods and results of historical linguistics can provide a window on the evolution of language, and second, based on the claim that some languages have no morphology (the so-called isolating languages), that morphology is not a necessary part of language. The aim of this paper is to suggest that there is in fact no basis for what I will call the Isolating Proto-Language Hypothesis (henceforth IPH), either on historical or typological grounds, and that the evolution of morphology remains an interesting question.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency in Language a Typological Study
    Transparency in language A typological study Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration © 2011: Sanne Leufkens – image from the performance ‘Celebration’ ISBN: 978-94-6093-162-8 NUR 616 Copyright © 2015: Sterre Leufkens. All rights reserved. Transparency in language A typological study ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. D.C. van den Boom ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel op vrijdag 23 januari 2015, te 10.00 uur door Sterre Cécile Leufkens geboren te Delft Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof. dr. P.C. Hengeveld Copromotor: Dr. N.S.H. Smith Overige leden: Prof. dr. E.O. Aboh Dr. J. Audring Prof. dr. Ö. Dahl Prof. dr. M.E. Keizer Prof. dr. F.P. Weerman Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen i Acknowledgments When I speak about my PhD project, it appears to cover a time-span of four years, in which I performed a number of actions that resulted in this book. In fact, the limits of the project are not so clear. It started when I first heard about linguistics, and it will end when we all stop thinking about transparency, which hopefully will not be the case any time soon. Moreover, even though I might have spent most time and effort to ‘complete’ this project, it is definitely not just my work. Many people have contributed directly or indirectly, by thinking about transparency, or thinking about me.
    [Show full text]
  • Nostratic Grammar: Synthetic Or Analytic?
    Nostratic grammar: synthetic or analytic? A. Dolgopolsky Haifa University § 1. The criteria determining the original analytic status of a gram- matical morpheme can be defined as follows. [1] Mobility: in the daughter languages the same morpheme some- times precedes autosemantic words and sometimes follows them (e. g. the pN *mA that forms participles and other deverbal nominals in daugh- ter-languages is found both before and after the verbal root). [2] In some daughter languages the morpheme is still analytic or has phonological evidence for its former analytic status [e. g. the N morpheme *bA (that forms animal names and other nouns of quality bearers) sur- vives in proto-Uralic *-pa; since the N intervocalic *-b- yields pFU *-w-, while the word-initial *b- yields U *p-, the Uralic suffix *pa must go back to a separate word]. [3] A grammatical morpheme of daughter-languages is etymologically identical with a separate word (e. g. the 1st person ending *-mi of the IE verb is identical with the N pronoun *mi that is preserved as a pronoun in daughter-languages). Sometimes other typological features (position in the word) may be taken into account. For instance, if in Semitic and Cushitic (Beja) verbs the feminine marker (*-ī) is used in the 2nd person only and is separated (as a suffix) from the person marker (prefix *t-), it is natural to suppose that it goes back to an address word (Hebrew tiħyī 'you' [f. sg.] will live' < N *t{u} 'thou' + *Хay{u} 'live' + *ʔ{a}yV 'mother'), which is typologically compara- ble with the gender distinction of a yes-word in spoken English: [yesз:] (< yes, sir) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • TWO FORMS of "BE" in MALAYALAM1 Tara Mohanan and K.P
    TWO FORMS OF "BE" IN MALAYALAM1 Tara Mohanan and K.P. Mohanan National University of Singapore 1. INTRODUCTION Malayalam has two verbs, uNTE and aaNE, recognized in the literature as copulas (Asher 1968, Variar 1979, Asher and Kumari 1997, among others). There is among speakers of Malayalam a clear, intuitively perceived meaning difference between the verbs. One strong intuition is that uNTE and aaNE correspond to the English verbs "have" and "be"; another is that they should be viewed as the "existential" and "equative" copulas respectively.2 However, in a large number of contexts, these verbs appear to be interchangeable. This has thwarted the efforts of a clear characterization of the meanings of the two verbs. In this paper, we will explore a variety of syntactic and semantic environments that shed light on the differences between the constructions with aaNE and uNTE. On the basis of the asymmetries we lay out, we will re-affirm the intuition that aaNE and uNTE are indeed equative and existential copulas respectively, with aaNE signaling the meaning of “x is an element/subset of y" and uNTE signaling the meaning of existence of an abstract or concrete entity in the fields of location or possession. We will show that when aaNE is interchangable with uNTE in existential clauses, its function is that of a cleft marker, with the existential meaning expressed independently by the case markers on the nouns. Central to our exploration of the two copulas is the discovery of four types of existential clauses in Malayalam, namely: Neutral: with the existential verb uNTE.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology, Documentation, Description, and Typology
    Typology, Documentation, Description, and Typology Marianne Mithun University of California, Santa Barbara Abstract If the goals of linguistic typology, are, as described by Plank (2016): (a) to chart linguistic diversity (b) to seek out order or even unity in diversity knowledge of the current state of the art is an invaluable tool for almost any linguistic endeavor. For language documentation and description, knowing what distinctions, categories, and patterns have been observed in other languages makes it possible to identify them more quickly and thoroughly in an unfamiliar language. Knowing how they differ in detail can prompt us to tune into those details. Knowing what is rare cross-linguistically can ensure that unusual features are richly documented and prominent in descriptions. But if documentation and description are limited to filling in typological checklists, not only will much of the essence of each language be missed, but the field of typology will also suffer, as new variables and correlations will fail to surface, and our understanding of deeper factors behind cross-linguistic similarities and differences will not progress. 1. Typological awareness as a tool Looking at the work of early scholars such as Franz Boas and Edward Sapir, it is impossible not to be amazed at the richness of their documentation and the insight of their descriptions of languages so unlike the more familiar languages of Europe. It is unlikely that Boas first arrived on Baffin Island forewarned to watch for velar/uvular distinctions and ergativity. Now more than a century later, an awareness of what distinctions can be significant in languages and what kinds of systems recur can provide tremendous advantages, allowing us to spot potentially important features sooner and identify patterns on the basis of fewer examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Comitative Adjuncts: Appositives and Non- Appositives1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Comitative adjuncts: appositives and non- appositives1 Dékány Éva 1. Introduction Expressions involving a comitative adverbial and a plural pronoun as its host DP are ambiguous in Hungarian. In the exclusive reading the comitative is added to the reference of the pronoun, thus in total at least three persons are referred to.2 In the inclusive reading, on the other hand, the referent of the comitative is not added to the referent of the pronoun, but included in it. Under this reading we with John, for instance, refers to two persons: John and me.3 (1) (Mi) Jánossal kisétáltunk a tóhoz.4 we.NOM John-COM PREV-walk-PAST-1PL the lake-ALLAT ‘We walked to the lake with John.’ (exclusive reading) ‘I walked to the lake with John.’ (inclusive reading) In the inclusive reading the most prominent member of the group denoted by the pronoun, whose person feature is the same as that of the pronoun, is termed focal referent. The focal referent in (1) is I. The group denoted by the plural pronoun comprises the focal referent and the referent of the comitative phrase (and nobody else), therefore the comitative is also known as completer phrase (Vassilieva 2005). The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the exclusive and inclusive readings in Hungarian display a strutural difference (cf. Skrabalova 2003 for Czech and Vassilieva 2005 for Russian) or whether non-structural phenomena contribute to their different interpretations (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California, San Diego
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO An Experimental Approach to Variation and Variability in Constituent Order A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Savithry Namboodiripad Committee in charge: Professor Grant Goodall, Chair Professor Farrell Ackerman Professor Victor Ferreira Professor Robert Kluender Professor John Moore 2017 Copyright Savithry Namboodiripad, 2017 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Savithry Namboodiripad is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on micro- film and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION iv EPIGRAPH (1) kaïãu: ña:n si:t”e: saw I Sita.ACC VERB SUBJECT OBJECT ‘I saw Sita’ Hanuman to Raman, needing to emphasize that he saw Sita The Ramayana (Malayalam translation) “borrowing (or diffusion, or calquing) of grammar in language contact is not a unitary mechanism of language change. Rather, it is a condition – or an externally motivated situation – under which the above three mechanisms [reanalysis, reinterpretation (or extension) and grammaticalization] can apply in an orderly and systematic way. The status of categories in the languages in contact is what determines the choice of a mechanism [...]”. Aikhenvald (2003) v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page................................... iii Dedication...................................... iv Epigraph.......................................v Table of Contents.................................. vi List of Figures...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inflection, P. 1
    36607. MORPHOLOGY Prof. Yehuda N. Falk Inflection, p. 1 In flectional morphology expresses morphosyntactic properties of lexemes. For each lexical category (part of speech) there is a certain set of available properties; the forms specify the properties. The most straightforward way to model this is in terms of features and their vvvaluesvaluesalues. For nirkod expresses a particular set of properties associated נרקוד example, the Hebrew form with the lexeme RAKAD : the feature TENSE with the value FUTURE , the feature PERSON with the value 1, and the feature NUMBER with the value PLURAL . The textbook uses di Terent terminology: in flectional dimension instead of feature , and in flectional category instead of value . The term feature is also sometimes used for a feature-value combination, such as the phrase “the past tense feature”. The in flectional properties of a word can be represented as a fffeature-valuefeature-value (or attribute-valueattribute-value) representation: RAKAD TENSE FUT nirkod PERS 1 NUM PL This can also be written horizontally, and even abbreviated: 〈RAKAD , [ TENSE FUT , PERS 1, NUM PL ]〉 nirkod 1Pl.Fut A paradigm is a chart showing all the features and feature values for a particular lexeme. The expression of in flectional properties is called exponenceexponence. In the simplest case, there is a . זכרונות one-to-one relationship between properties and exponents. Note the word ZIKARON zixron+ot []NUM PL Zixron is the stem, and the su Ux -ot is the exponent of the [ NUM PL ] feature. טובות Not everything is that simple, though. Consider the adjective 36607. MORPHOLOGY Prof. Yehuda N. Falk Inflection, p.
    [Show full text]