New World Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a Revision at Generic Level

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New World Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a Revision at Generic Level NEW WORLD PHOLCID SPIDERS (ARANEAE: PHOLCIDAE): A REVISION AT GENERIC LEVEL BERNHARD A. HUBER Division of Invertebrate Zoology American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 254, 348 pages, 1357 figures, 9 maps, 4 appendices Issued June 30, 2000 Price: $29.30 a copy Copyright ᭧ American Museum of Natural History 2000 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................... 04 Introduction ................................................................... 04 Materials and Methods ....................................................... 06 Acknowledgments ........................................................... 07 Phylogenetics ................................................................. 07 Terminal Taxa ............................................................... 07 Characters Scored ........................................................... 09 Characters Not Scored ....................................................... 32 Cladistic Analysis ........................................................... 34 Taxonomy—Pholcidae .......................................................... 41 Diagnosis ................................................................... 41 Description ................................................................. 46 Natural History .............................................................. 48 Composition ................................................................ 50 Key to New World Genera ................................................... 50 Metagonia Simon .............................................................. 53 Leptopholcus Simon ............................................................ 76 Ninetis Simon ................................................................. 80 Nerudia, New Genus ........................................................... 87 Kambiwa, New Genus .......................................................... 87 Gertschiola Brignoli ........................................................... 90 Ibotyporanga Mello-Leita˜o ...................................................... 94 Guaranita, New Genus ......................................................... 96 Galapa, New Genus .......................................................... 100 Enetea, New Genus ........................................................... 103 Aucana, New Genus .......................................................... 105 Pholcophora Banks ........................................................... 113 Tolteca, New Genus .......................................................... 117 Papiamenta, New Genus ...................................................... 121 Chisosa, New Genus .......................................................... 124 Priscula Simon ............................................................... 128 Tainonia, New Genus ......................................................... 145 Physocyclus Simon ............................................................ 148 Ixchela, New Genus ........................................................... 150 Aymaria, New Genus .......................................................... 153 Chibchea, New Genus ......................................................... 162 Mesabolivar Gonza´lez-Sponga .................................................. 189 Carapoia Gonza´lez-Sponga .................................................... 238 Coryssocnemis Simon ......................................................... 246 Mecoloesthus Simon .......................................................... 255 Kaliana, New Genus .......................................................... 271 Waunana, New Genus ......................................................... 274 Pisaboa, New Genus .......................................................... 281 Pomboa, New Genus .......................................................... 288 Litoporus Simon .............................................................. 292 Otavaloa, New Genus ......................................................... 305 Teuia, New Genus ............................................................ 313 Tupigea, New Genus .......................................................... 314 Canaima, New Genus ......................................................... 327 Blancoa, New Genus .......................................................... 330 Species Incertae Sedis ......................................................... 334 2 2000 HUBER: NEW WORLD PHOLCID SPIDERS 3 References ................................................................... 337 Appendix 1. Matrix for Phylogenetic Analysis ................................... 342 Appendix 2. Cladogram ....................................................... 343 Appendix 3. Species of Wrong or Doubtful Generic Position ....................... 344 Appendix 4. Complete List of Pholcid Genera Worldwide ......................... 346 Index of Generic and Specific Names ........................................... 347 4 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 254 ABSTRACT New World pholcids are revised at the generic level, with an emphasis on South America. A total of 47 extant genera occur in the New World, 22 of which are newly described. A preliminary key to the genera of the New World is presented. Redescriptions are given for 11 genera and for 59 species, and 106 species are newly described. Three generic names and 14 specific names are newly synonymized (see below). A numerical cladistic analysis is per- formed using a matrix of 61 taxa (48 of them New World pholcids) and 61 morphological characters. The main results of the analysis are as follows: (1) Pholcids are strongly supported as a monophyletic group. (2) Pholcids are separated into the following clades, which are tentatively named to emphasize their character as a working hypothesis: ‘‘ninetines,’’ ‘‘phol- cines’’ (Metagonia Simon and the Pholcus group sensu Huber), ‘‘holocnemines’’ (Holocnemus group sensu Timm, Artema Walckenaer, Physocyclus Simon, and Priscula Simon), and the ‘‘New World clade.’’ Their interrelationships are not definitively resolved. (3) New World pholcids are an assemblage of representatives of all major clades within the family, but most genera are part of the New World clade, which is the only clade restricted to the New World. (4) A hypothesis concerning the evolutionary transformation of characters is given for 41 of the 54 traits scored that vary among pholcids. The following names are newly synonymized: Anomalaia Gonza´lez-Sponga, 1998, with Metagonia Simon, 1893; Blechroscelis Simon, 1893, with Priscula Simon, 1893; Myrmido- nella Berland, 1919, with Ninetis Simon, 1890; Blechroscelis coeruleus (Keyserling, 1891), with Coryssocnemis [now Mesabolivar] togatus (Keyserling, 1891); Blechroscelis irroratus Mello-Leita˜o, 1947, Psilochorus browningi Roewer, 1951, and Blechroscelis virescens Mello- Leita˜o, 1947, with Blechroscelis [now Mesabolivar] aurantiacus (Mello-Leita˜o, 1930); Ble- chroscelis viridis Mello-Leita˜o, 1918, with Litoporus [now Mesabolivar] brasiliensis (Moenk- haus, 1898); Hypsorinus conwayi Mello-Leita˜o, 1947, with Priscula binghamae (Chamberlin, 1916); Priscula ranchograndensis Gonza´lez-Sponga, 1996, with Priscula venezuelana Simon, 1893; Litoporus abrahami Mello-Leita˜o, 1947, with Coryssocnemis [now Litoporus] uncatus (Simon, 1893); Litoporus coccineus Simon, 1893, Litoporus imbecillus (Keyserling, 1891), and Litoporus fulvus Moenkhaus, 1898, with Litoporus [now Mesabolivar] luteus (Keyserling, 1891); Micromerys occidentalis (Mello-Leita˜o, 1929), with Micropholcus fauroti (Simon, 1887); Pholcus dubiomaculatus Mello-Leita˜o, 1918, with Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775); Physocyclus dubius Mello-Leita˜o, 1922, with Physocyclus globosus (Taczanowski, 1874). INTRODUCTION One of the major incentives for this study survey in a single state (Departamento del was the gross imbalance between the appar- Valle) yielded a total of 52 morphospecies, ent diversity and species richness of pholcid only one of which could be identified (Flor- spiders on one hand, and the seemingly ez, 1996). In another faunistic study in north- hopeless taxonomic situation within the fam- ern Peru, Silva (1996) reported over two doz- ily on the other hand, especially regarding en morphospecies from a restricted rainforest the Neotropics. The first point has been made area, while only four species were previously clear in a number of recent, scattered studies recorded from all of Peru. Species numbers that have shown that throughout the tropics, have increased tremendously in the few cases pholcids are not only vastly more diverse where more or less comprehensive surveys than suggested by the number of nominal were made (e.g., Gertsch, 1982, who de- species, but that in some areas they are even scribed 44 new species of Anopsicus Cham- among the dominant web-building spider berlin and Ivie in a region where only 19 families. For example, while only five phol- were previously known; Huber, 1998c, who cid species were previously recorded from described 10 new species of Modisimus Si- Colombia (two of them were actually col- mon in Costa Rica, where only one was pre- lected in Hamburg from bananas shipped viously recorded). There are hints that the from Colombia: Schmidt, 1956), a spider situation in the Old World is not much dif- 2000 HUBER: NEW WORLD PHOLCID SPIDERS 5 ferent: Deeleman-Reinhold (1986a) reported not surprising that subsequent
Recommended publications
  • The Pholcid Spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Joseph A
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 2008 The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Joseph A. Beatty James W. Berry Butler University, [email protected] Bernhard A. Huber Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Beatty, Joseph A.; Berry, James W.; and Huber, Bernhard A., "The hop lcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)" Journal of Arachnology / (2008): 1-25. Available at http://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/782 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Author(s): Joseph A. Beatty, James W. Berry, Bernhard A. Huber Source: Journal of Arachnology, 36(1):1-25. Published By: American Arachnological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/H05-66.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1636/H05-66.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Insect Arthropod Types in the ZFMK Collection, Bonn (Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda)
    03_huber.qxd 01.12.2010 9:31 Uhr Seite 217 Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 58 pp. 217–226 Bonn, November 2010 Non-insect arthropod types in the ZFMK collection, Bonn (Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda) Bernhard A. Huber & Stefanie Lankhorst Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The type specimens of Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, and Amphipoda housed in the Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Museum, Bonn, are listed. 183 names are recorded; of these, 64 (35%) are represented by name bearing (i.e., primary) types. Specific and subspecific names are listed alphabetically, followed by the original genus name, bibliographic citation, present combination (as far as known to the authors), and emended label data. Key Words. Type specimens, Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda, Bonn. INTRODUCTION The ZFMK in Bonn has a relatively small collection of Abbreviations. HT: holotype, PT: paratype, ST: syntype, non-insect arthropods, with an emphasis on arachnids LT: lectotype, PLT: paralectotype; n, pn, dn, tn: (proto-, (mostly mites, spiders, and scorpions), sea spiders (Pan- deuto-, trito-) nymph, hy: hypopus, L: larva topoda) and amphipods. Other arachnid and crustacean or- ders are represented, but not by type material. A small part of the material goes back to the founder of the museum, ACARI Alexander Koenig, and was collected around 1910. Most Acari were deposited at the museum by F. S. Lukoschus aequatorialis [Orycteroxenus] Lukoschus, Gerrits & (mostly Astigmata: Glyciphagidae, Atopomelidae, etc.), Fain, 1977b. PT, 2 slides. CONGO REP.: Mt de Braz- Pantopoda by F. Krapp (Mediterranean, Weddell Seas), za (near Brazzaville), host: Crocidura aequatorialis, and Amphipoda by G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Spiders (Araneae: Arachnida) in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 April 2016 | 8(4): 8703–8713 A preliminary checklist of spiders (Araneae: Arachnida) in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India 1 2 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) C.K. Adarsh & P.O. Nameer Communication Short ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1,2 Centre for Wildlife Sciences, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680656, India 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) OPEN ACCESS Abstract: A preliminary study was conducted to document spider the spiders are regarded as poisonous creatures, and the diversity in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Idukki District, Kerala State in general perception about them among the people are southern India. The study was conducted from October to November 2012. A total of 101 species of spiders belonging to 65 genera from negative. But the fact is that very few spiders are actually 29 families were identified from the sanctuary. This accounted for poisonous and harmful to human beings (Mathew et 6.98% of Indian spider species, 17.81% of Indian spider genera and 48.33% of the spider families of India. The dominant families were al. 2009). However, the services these creature do to Lycosidae (11 species) and Araneidae (10). Two endemic genera of mankind by way of controlling pest species have been Indian spiders such as Annandaliella and Neoheterophrictus were well documented (Riechert & Lockley 1984; Tanaka found at Chinnar, each representing one species each, and belonging to the family Theraphosidae. A guild structure analysis of the spiders 1989; Bishop & Riechert 1990). Being a less charismatic revealed seven feeding guilds such as orb weavers, stalkers, ground species and the scarcity of biologists studying spiders, runners, foliage runners, sheet web builders, space web builders and studies on the spiders of India in general and Western ambushers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aranhas (Araneae, Arachnida) Do Estado De São Paulo, Brasil: Diversidade, Esforço Amostral E Estado Do Conhecimento
    Biota Neotrop., vol. 11(Supl.1) Aranhas (Araneae, Arachnida) do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil: diversidade, esforço amostral e estado do conhecimento Antonio Domingos Brescovit1,4, Ubirajara de Oliveira2,3 & Adalberto José dos Santos2 1Laboratório de Artrópodes, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, n. 1500, CEP 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected] 2Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av. Antonio Carlos, n. 6627, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG 4Autor para correspondência: Antonio Domingos Brescovit, e-mail: [email protected] BRESCOVIT, A.D., OLIVEIRA, U. & SANTOS, A.J. Spiders (Araneae, Arachnida) from São Paulo State, Brazil: diversity, sampling efforts, and state-of-art. Biota Neotrop. 11(1a): http://www.biotaneotropica.org. br/v11n1a/en/abstract?inventory+bn0381101a2011. Abstract: In this study we present a database of spiders described and registered from the Neotropical region between 1757 and 2008. Results are focused on the diversity of the group in the State of São Paulo, compared to other Brazilian states. Data was compiled from over 25,000 records, published in scientific papers dealing with Neotropical fauna. These records enabled the evaluation of the current distribution of the species, the definition of collection gaps and priority biomes, and even future areas of endemism for Brazil. A total of 875 species, distributed in 50 families, have been described from the State of São Paulo.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography1
    Pacific Insects 6 (4) : 665-687 December 30, 1964 SPIDERS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: CATALOG AND BIBLIOGRAPHY1 By Theodore W. Suman BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU, HAWAII Abstract: This paper contains a systematic list of species, and the literature references, of the spiders occurring in the Hawaiian Islands. The species total 149 of which 17 are record­ ed here for the first time. This paper lists the records and literature of the spiders in the Hawaiian Islands. The islands included are Kure, Midway, Laysan, French Frigate Shoal, Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, Maui and Hawaii. The only major work dealing with the spiders in the Hawaiian Is. was published 60 years ago in " Fauna Hawaiiensis " by Simon (1900 & 1904). All of the endemic spiders known today, except Pseudanapis aloha Forster, are described in that work which also in­ cludes a listing of several introduced species. The spider collection available to Simon re­ presented only a small part of the entire Hawaiian fauna. In all probability, the endemic species are only partly known. Since the appearance of Simon's work, there have been many new records and lists of introduced spiders. The known Hawaiian spider fauna now totals 149 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 21 families and 66 genera. Of this total, 82 species (5596) are believed to be endemic and belong to 10 families and 27 genera including 7 endemic genera. The introduced spe­ cies total 65 (44^). Two unidentified species placed in indigenous genera comprise the remaining \%. Seventeen species are recorded here for the first time. In the catalog section of this paper, families, genera and species are listed alphabetical­ ly for convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Anti-Predator Devices of Spiders* Invaders Away Or Kill and Eat Them
    Bull. Br. arachnol. Soc. (1995) 10 (3), 81-96 81 A review of the anti-predator devices of spiders* invaders away or kill and eat them. The pirate spiders (Mimetidae) that have been studied feed almost J. L. Cloudsley-Thompson exclusively on other spiders, whilst certain Salticidae 10 Battishill Street, (Portia spp.) feed not only upon insects, but sometimes London Nl 1TE also on other jumping spiders, and even tackle large orb-weavers in their webs (see below). Several other Summary families and genera, including Archaeidae, Palpimanus (Palpimanidae), Argyrodes and Theridion (Theridiidae), The predators of spiders are mostly either about the and Chorizopes (Araneidae) contain species that include same size as their prey (arthropods) or much larger (vertebrates), against each of which different types of de- other spiders in their diet. Sexual cannibalism has been fence have evolved. Primary defences include anachoresis, reviewed by Elgar (1992). Other books in which the phenology, crypsis, protective resemblance and disguise, enemies of spiders are discussed include: Berland (1932), spines and warning coloration, mimicry (especially of ants), Bristowe (1958), Cloudsley-Thompson (1958, 1980), cocoons and retreats, barrier webs, web stabilimenta and Edmunds (1974), Gertsch (1949), Main (1976), Millot detritus, and communal webs. Secondary defences are flight, dropping to the ground, colour change and thanatosis, (1949), Preston-Mafham, R. & K. (1984), Savory (1928), web vibration, whirling and bouncing, autotomy, venoms Thomas (1953) and Wise (1993). (For earlier references, and defensive fluids, urticating setae, warning sounds and see Warburton, 1909). deimatic displays. The anti-predator adaptations of spiders The major predators of spiders fall into two cate- are extremely complex, and combinations of the devices gories: (a) those about the same size as their prey (mainly listed frequently occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 120, 17 pages 25 May 2017 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE SPIDERS OF RAPA NUI (E ASTER ISLAND ) R EVISITED DARKO D. C OTORAS , J. J UDSON WYNNE , LUIS FLORES -P RADO & C RISTIAN VILLAGRA BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Cover image: The potentially endemic and undescribed Tetragnatha sp., believed restricted to the totora reeds lin - ing the shores of Rano Raraku crater lake. Photo: Darko Cortoras. Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu - ESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The R Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (eISSN 2376-3191) is a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sci - PUBLICATIONS OF ences. BISHOP MUSEUM The Bishop Museum Press also publishes the Bishop Museum Bulletin series. It was begun in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research throughout the Pacific in many scientific fields. In 1987, the Bulletin series was separated into the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly and, since 2017, electronically: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (eISSN 2376-3132) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (eISSN 2376-3078) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (eISSN 2376-3124) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (eISSN 2376-3213) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (eISSN 2376-3159) To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi - cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP MUSEUM ISSN 0893-1348 (print) The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 2376-3191 (online) 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Published online: 25 May 2017 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Spiders of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Revisted .
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint a REPORT on CAVE SPIDERS FROM
    !"#$%&'(()*+,%-%.)/0+,* A REPORT ON CAVE SPIDERS FROM MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA 1 Willis J. Gertsch2 Curator Emeritus, American Museum of Natural History, New York About one hundred species of spiders have so far can caves. been reported from cave habitats in Mexico and in- The obligate cavernicoles are always of special tensive collecting surveys will eventually enlarge this interest because of deep commitment to cave exist- list several times. In an earlier paper Gertsch (1971) ence. Six additional species from Mexico and Central cited 86 species, most of them new, and the present America enlarge this total to 19 from the 13 Mexican report further enlarges the Mexican fauna by addition taxa noted in the earlier paper. Two additional fami- of 20 species of which 16 are herein described for the lies, Telemidae and Ochyroceratidae, are now repre- first time. In addition, eight new species are reported sented as listed below. from caves in Guatemala, Belize (British Honduras), Family Dipluridae and Panama of Central America, the larger area con- Euagrus anops, new species sidered in this paper. Additional records with full Cueva de la Porra, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico. collecting data are presented for some species noted Family Theraphosidae on earlier lists, and I look forward to future considera- Schizopelma reddelli, new species tion of spider families not mentioned here. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio, Spiders are important predators of crawling and Oaxaca, Mexico. flying invertebrates and penetrate into all parts of Family Pholcidae caves where prey is present. The regional cave fauna is Metagonia martha, new species derived from local taxa and comprises distinctive ele- Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio, ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Cave-Dwelling Pholcid Spider from North-Western Australia, with an Identification Key to the Genera of Australian Pholcidae (Araneae)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~---~~~~~~~~- _ _--- Ree. West. Aus/. Mus. 1993 16(3): 323-329 DESCRIPTION OF A NEW CAVE-DWELLING PHOLCID SPIDER FROM NORTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA, WITH AN IDENTIFICATION KEY TO THE GENERA OF AUSTRALIAN PHOLCIDAE (ARANEAE) CL Deeleman-Reinhold* ABSTRACT A new species of cave-dwelling pholcid spider is described. Trichocyclus septentrionalis sp.nov. was collected in various caves in North West Cape, northern Western Australia; it does not show troglobitic features in its morphology and was also fOWld outside caves. The genus Trichocyclus is diagnosed and differences with related genera are indicated. The type species, T. nigropunctaJus Simon, 1908, is redescribed. An identification key to all pholcid genera ofAustralia is presented. INTRODUCTION Scientific exploration ofthe Australian cavefauna has been relatively recent. Such explorations have revealed a rich spider fauna associated with caves in many parts ofsouthern Australia (Gray 1973a,b; Main 1976) and more recently in Chillagoe caves and Undara lava tubes. A specialised cave spider fauna was recorded and partly described by Main (1969), Gray (1973a) and Main and Gray (1985). Cavesin limestonesofdifferentgeologicalages in Western Australiaharbourspiders (Watson, et al. 1990). In recent years the Western Australian Museum has conducted extensive surveys of caves in the Cape Range, North West Cape, Western Australia (Humphreys 1991). Nevertheless muchofthe cavespiderfauna ofAustraliaremains undescribed. Thepholcid spiders collected in North West Cape belong to one species only. They do not exhibit any morphological cave-adaptations such as reduction of eye size or pigmentation; the environment may however have effected a lengthening of the legs. The following abbreviations are used: AME, PME: anterior, posterior median eyes; ALE, PLE: anterior, posterior lateral eyes; MNHN: Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris; RMNH: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden; ZMH: Zoologisches Museum, Ham­ burg.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Research on Epichloë Endophytes in Chinese Native Grasses
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306420810 Advances in Research on Epichloë endophytes in Chinese Native Grasses Article in Frontiers in Microbiology · September 2016 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01399 CITATIONS READS 0 67 10 authors, including: Hui Song Chao Xia Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou University 17 PUBLICATIONS 31 CITATIONS 5 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Wenbo xu Pei Tian Lanzhou University Lanzhou University 1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Codon usage pattern in Medicago and Arachis View project All content following this page was uploaded by Hui Song on 07 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. REVIEW published: 07 September 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01399 Advances in Research on Epichloë endophytes in Chinese Native Grasses Hui Song, Zhibiao Nan *, Qiuyan Song, Chao Xia, Xiuzhang Li, Xiang Yao, Wenbo Xu, Yu Kuang, Pei Tian and Qingping Zhang State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China Epichloë fungal endophytes are broadly found in cool-season grasses. The symbiosis between these grasses and Epichloë may improve the abiotic and biotic resistance of the grass plant, but some Epichloë species produce alkaloids that are toxic for livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]