Chapter V - the SIEGE of MALANGGAD (17S0)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter V - the SIEGE of MALANGGAD (17S0) THE FIRST aNQLO-MARATHA WAR THIRD PHASE (1779-1783) Chapter V - THE SIEGE OF MALANGGAD (17S0) For geographical refergnccs. see lllus. Kps. 11. 11 A. IIB.IIC. 12. and I'i. attached at the beglnnln£ of this chapter, between d p . 15^-155. Also see seven photos attached with notes at C the end of this chapter between pp. 2oy.“2o8. a r a &z PA^AP Pin MACNI CD HAJI MAL 1=3 1=3 D SON MACH! N O . 11'R {^ ROITGH SKUTCH OF ? l ^ M R C H I ( MH Lft^^gGftI>) (N 0.11--B) REMAINS OF RETAINING W/ILL OF LOWER PORT (m ALAN G-G AD ) I I \ a *€ — ^ 1 CMal" PLAN OF BURUJ & CAJf WAV in SON MAdHl'r^lftLftNGGBJ)) 18' • Holes fo r r/A7a^/?'^oo BALE KILLA ^— -— ► MACHI (j\l‘0 , 1 1 - c ) . MAP NO. 12 PtACES RELATED TO ©SIEGE or MAUANGGAD (1780) ©SIEGE OF THE VASAI FORT(1780) ©SECOND BORqhM“ EXPED|TI0N(1781) BAHIRAVGAD MACH»NDRA(rAy t BHIMASHANKAR ^ Vpek T g h a t p a n v e l 0? PAuAspe •^ALDUNGE MAN;Ti tl. i« 'itNCH a SMILES yVnopoti I n) BoRGHAr jQ ,KW AN»AtA \ a UfNAWAt^ Ni t^HaA0£3v«SAPUR To POOH A i / I'JAP N O 13 ^ Pi.AN O f ihf aa/\p FORT.-RiyjvL positions(lyeo) (kfPRODtJCfD fljtoM ^jiiWFV Nv> FM.MOU.tr VAl)l, 1>(lUKA KALVAN) BOUNDARY Of VHLAGt NOTAl.F. CHAPTER V THE SIEQSOF MALANQGAP (17^0) The Convention of Vadgao marked the end of the second phase of the first Anglo-Maratha War, but it did not end the war itself. The dark clouds of a fresh Anglo-Maratha conflict soon arose on the political horizon of India. When the Bomba/ army was suffering humiliating defeat at Vadgao in January 1779, the Calcutta army under the command*of Colonel Goddard, despatched by Governor General Warren Hastings, was on its way to Bombay to help it* Goddard crossed Narmada on the 3rd December 177d and reached Surat via Burhanpur on^25thtb<£ February, 1779. X To his morti­ fication, he heard the nei^is of the disaster of Vadgao at Suratf before he could Join the Bombay army. The humiliating treaty of Vadgao gave a rude shock to Governor General Warren Hastings. However, he exhibited a statesmanlike grasp of the situation and put forth seve­ ral proposals before the Supreme Council to retrieve the disgrace heaped on the British arms by the i^arathas. 2 One of them was that the Snglish should conclude peace with the Marathas on the basis of the treaty of Purandar of iVlareh 1775.^ His plan was unanioiously agreed to and Colonel Goddard was appointed the accredited envoy to treat with the Peshwa’s Government. According to this plan, the Marathas were to forego the territories acquired by them through the 155 156 Convention of Vadgao and they were never to adialt any trench forces or allow the Irench traders to fora any estab­ lishments in Uieir territories. Hastings considered that if peace could not be obtained on these basic conditions, the English should resort to a vigorous war to efface the loss they had suffered at Vadgao. Before Goddard started negotiations with the Pune Darbar as instructed by Warren Hastings, Raghoba, who was in the custody of Mahadaji Shinde according to the terms of the treaty of Vadgao, made good his escape near Jhansi and accompanied by Bajirao, his son and .\raritrao, his adopted son, reached Surat at the beginning of June, 1779. Raghoba sought the English protection which Goddard promotly granted. This act was a serious breach of the terms of the treaties of Purandar and Vadgao on the part of the British. Soon Goddard started negotiations with the Pune Darbar. iiiii The negotiations went on tillj[28th October, 1779. Ultimately Goddard was informed by the Karbharis that tJhey would not make peace with the English unless Sashti was relir^uished ♦and the person of Haghunathrao delivered up to the Marathas.^ Thus the negotiations stood on the verge of a breaking point. vsrhile the fate of the Anglo-Mar atha peace talks thus hung in the balance, Goddard received intelligence of a ry confederacy between the Peshwa, Mudhoji Bhonsale of Nagpur, 157 th« Nizam and Haidar Ali against the British in September, 1779.^ While the Nisaun was its originator, Nana Phadnis was the brain behind it and its organiser. The comnrion feeling of enmity against the British had brought the unity of these four Indian powers, who otherwise used to quarrel with one another. The Nizam had broken himself with the British because they had usurped Guntur from Basalat Jang, one of his vassals. Haidar .^i alienated himself from the British because the latter had captured Mahe from the French who were on friendly terms with him. Mudhoji Bhonsale was indignant at the manner in which the British established their sway over the Bengal province, depriving him of his annual share of Chouth from that province. The Pune Darbar was already displeased with the British because Colonel Goddard refused to hand over Sashti and the person of Haghoba to the Marathas. The scheme laid down by the members of the quadruple alliance was this; Mudhoji Bhonsale was to invade Bengal and its dependencies, Nizam Ali the Northern Circars, Haidar Ali the Karnatak and *4ahadaji - i’ukoji were to oppose Goddard 6 in G uj^at. If properly planned and executed, this scheme would have Isolated the three British Presidencies at Bombay, Calcutta and Madras and exterpated them from the political map of India. It was a masterstroke of Nana's political strategy. Sensing the grave threat posed by the confederacy to I5d the British power in India, Goddard broke the peace parleys with the r^une Government and came to i3ombay on the 1st November, 1779. In consultation with the Bombay Council, he planned a counter offensive against the ii^arathas as a fitting reply to the plan evolved by the four native powers. According to Goddard’s plan, the British were to attack the Maratha territories in Oujrat, Malwa and Konkan simultane­ ously, 8 0 that the Maratha forces would be divided on three fronts and prove impotent to get the better of the British arms. Goddard knew well that Oujrat was tom with a civil war between the two brothers, Fateh Sing and Govindrao Gaikwad. He, therefore, advised the Bombay Governtnent to conclude a treaty with fateh Sing and win over his alle- tt giani through peaceful overtures. If Fateh bing refused to reconcile to the British proposcl , then force was to be applied. In that case Goddard hiraself was to lead an expe­ dition to Gnjrat, conquer the fertile i'laratha territories there within two months and rotorn to Bombay to help the Bombay Government in its conquest of the important port of Vasai and its adjacent territories, whose revenue would make substantial addition to the treasury of the Bombay Govern­ ment and relieve it of its financial difficulties which were the outcome of a continuous war with the /larathas. Besides, the expenses of the Calcutta army under Goddard could be met without any undue burden on the financial r-sources of the Bombay Governinent. 159 GkJddard furbher &ug,^,ested that the British rulers In north India should encourage the recalcitrant local chiefs to rebel against Mahadaji Shinde and harass his army stationed in his territories so that he would be compelled to leave Gujrat and go to /ialwa. This vrould further reduce the strength of the I^arathas on ^Gujrat and Konkan fronts. The plan envisaged by Nana, Haidar, Mudhoji and the Nizam did not function properly. The last two did not take any initiative in making swift attacks in their reupective territories, Haidar Ali, however, kept up his promise and attacked i^^dras with a view to harassing the British, which was also a litiiJLe behind the schedule, i'lana and Manadaji too lacked swift movements in attacking che British terri­ tories. They were suspicious of each other and wasted much time in correspondence regarding the military tactics to be adopted. I advantage of lethargy on the part of the Maratha officers, Goddard, by swift, rapid marches entered Gujrat and 7 captured the fort of Dabhai on the 20th:ot January 1780 and lihmedabad on the 15th Febz*uary next. Earlier, he concluded a treaty with Fateh Sing Gaikwad and won him over to the British side.^ At t^is stage iMahadaJi Shinde and i'ukoji Holkar entured Gujrat. The I'larathas avoided a direct attack on Goddard's army which was well-equipped with artillery and adopted their traditional guerilla tactics. Goddard, there­ fore, could not achieve a decisive victory thovigh he gained loo some minor triumphs over the i^arathas. As the rainy season was approaching near, he returned to Surat on the 8th June, 1780. ^When the British and the ^^iarathas were locked in minor engagements on the Oujrat front, the army units of the Calcutta Government captured the strong fort of Gwalher in possession of Kahadaji Shinde on the l»th August, 1760. This was a severe blow to the prestige of the ^iarathas in general and rtahadaji in particular. *'dahadaji, therefore, decided to encamp at UJJain in June 1780. Thus Ooddard's plan succeeded in removing Mahadaji from the Gujrat front. W t e r the departure of Goddard and ^ahadaji to Surat and Ujjain respectively, the focal point of the nnglo-Maratha iftar shifted from Gujrat and j'lalwa to the Konkan region, fhe Bombay Government was growing impatient because Goddard's Gujrat campaign was consuming more time than was expected.
Recommended publications
  • Sources of Maratha History: Indian Sources
    1 SOURCES OF MARATHA HISTORY: INDIAN SOURCES Unit Structure : 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Maratha Sources 1.3 Sanskrit Sources 1.4 Hindi Sources 1.5 Persian Sources 1.6 Summary 1.7 Additional Readings 1.8 Questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES After the completion of study of this unit the student will be able to:- 1. Understand the Marathi sources of the history of Marathas. 2. Explain the matter written in all Bakhars ranging from Sabhasad Bakhar to Tanjore Bakhar. 3. Know Shakavalies as a source of Maratha history. 4. Comprehend official files and diaries as source of Maratha history. 5. Understand the Sanskrit sources of the Maratha history. 6. Explain the Hindi sources of Maratha history. 7. Know the Persian sources of Maratha history. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The history of Marathas can be best studied with the help of first hand source material like Bakhars, State papers, court Histories, Chronicles and accounts of contemporary travelers, who came to India and made observations of Maharashtra during the period of Marathas. The Maratha scholars and historians had worked hard to construct the history of the land and people of Maharashtra. Among such scholars people like Kashinath Sane, Rajwade, Khare and Parasnis were well known luminaries in this field of history writing of Maratha. Kashinath Sane published a mass of original material like Bakhars, Sanads, letters and other state papers in his journal Kavyetihas Samgraha for more eleven years during the nineteenth century. There is much more them contribution of the Bharat Itihas Sanshodhan Mandal, Pune to this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Maratha Empire
    Maratha Empire It is the people of the country that define that country. There are many empires and dynasties in India that are a part of India’s rich and varied history. These empires and dynasties have undoubtedly played a major role in the betterment and development of India as a country. They have contributed in making India what it is today. They are our nation’s pride, which we as citizens ought to celebrate, respect and remember, for they have made us who we are today. One such empire is the grandiose and large Maratha Empire. The Maratha Empire as a consolidated Empire ruled over a large portion of the Indian subcontinent from the 18th century. It formally began ruling as a consolidated power under the rule of Chhatrapati Shivaji who ascended the throne in 1674. He was of the Bhosale dynasty. This great sovereign is considered by historians to be the founder of the Maratha Empire. Chhatrapati Shivaji revolted against the Adil Shahi sultanate of Bijapur as well as the Mughal Empire. His goal was to free the Marathi people and establish a separate Hindu Kingdom for them, which was based on the lines of self- rule. Later, he started consolidating lands under his control and established a kingdom with its capital as Raigadh. By the time of his death, his kingdom had about 300 forts, 40,000 cavalry, 50,000 foot soldiers and powerful naval establishments all over the west coast. Thus, he founded the Maratha Empire, and laid the base for it to become one of the greatest Empires India has ever seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Self Study Report of WAGHIRE COLLEGE of ARTS, COMMERCE and SCIENCE
    Self Study Report of WAGHIRE COLLEGE OF ARTS, COMMERCE AND SCIENCE SELF STUDY REPORT FOR 3rd CYCLE OF ACCREDITATION WAGHIRE COLLEGE OF ARTS, COMMERCE AND SCIENCE A/P- SASWAD, TAL-PURANDAR, DIST-PUNE 412301 www.pdea-wcs.org Submitted To NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL BANGALORE April 2019 Page 1/113 16-05-2019 12:26:09 Self Study Report of WAGHIRE COLLEGE OF ARTS, COMMERCE AND SCIENCE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction Waghire College of Arts, Commerce and Science, Saswad was established in 1972 under the aegis of Pune District Education Association, an Educational Trust founded in 1941 with the mission of Eradication of the social scourge illiteracy prevalent amongst the rural masses in Pune District. It is located 42 Km away to the east of Pune city. The latitude of Saswad, Maharashtra, India is 18.344749, and the longitude is 74.031715 with elevation 773 meters height, that is equal to 2,536 feet. The Government of Maharashtra has declared entire Purandar Tehsil as hilly area. The most of the people in Purandar Tehsil rely on Farming, though it is a drought- prone area. The students pursuing education from the college are mainly from rural and economically weaker sections. Saswad has a great historical, cultural, social, literary and spiritual background. The town is known for the Samadhi of the First Peshawa Balaji Vishwanath; it is the birth place of the literary artist versatile Late Shri. P. K. Atre; and it has the Samadhi Temple of Saint Sopan Deo, the younger brother of Saint Dnyaneshwar.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 8Th History Lesson -4 the Eighteenth Century India Exercise A. Answer the Following Questions: Q1.(A) Name the Last Important Ruler of the Mughal Dynasty
    Class 8th History Lesson -4 The Eighteenth Century India Exercise A. Answer the following questions: Q1.(a) Name the last important ruler of the Mughal dynasty. A1.(a) Aurangzeb was the last important Mughal ruler of the Mughal dynasty. Q1.(b) When did he die? A1.(b) He died in 1707 CE. Q2.(a)What was the Mansabdari system? A2.(a) The system in which salaries and responsibilities of a person is determined according to his rank. Q2.(b) What was the Jagirdari system? A2.(b) The system in which Jagir or land was given to landlords in return for their services. Q3.There were several reasons for the decline of the Mughal Empire. In this context discuss the following: (a) Rivalry among the nobles A3.(a) (i)The nobles of the Mughal court were divided into many segments like Afghans, Turanis, Iranis and Hindustani. (ii)These nobles constantly struggled with one another for power. (iii) This hampered the smooth functioning of the administration. (b) Nadir Shah's invasion of India. A3.(b) (i)Nadir Shah invaded India in 1739. (ii)He defeated the Mughal army and marched towards Delhi. (iii)He looted the enormous wealth and took the famous Kohinoor diamond and the Peacock Throne. (c) Challenges faced from regional kingdoms. A3.(c) (i)The governors of Bengal,Awadh and Hyderabad became powerful during the reign of the later Mughals. (ii)They stopped paying taxes. (iii)They began disobeying the orders of the Mughal emperor and declared themselves independent. Q4. The rulers of Bengal were kind and welfare oriented.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Maharashtra Before the Times of Shivaji Maharaj
    The Coordination Committee formed by GR No. Abhyas - 2116/(Pra.Kra.43/16) SD - 4 Dated 25.4.2016 has given approval to prescribe this textbook in its meeting held on 3.3.2017 HISTORY AND CIVICS STANDARD SEVEN Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research, Pune - 411 004. First Edition : 2017 © Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research, Reprint : September 2020 Pune - 411 004. The Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research reserves all rights relating to the book. No part of this book should be reproduced without the written permission of the Director, Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research, ‘Balbharati’, Senapati Bapat Marg, Pune 411004. History Subject Committee : Cartographer : Dr Sadanand More, Chairman Shri. Ravikiran Jadhav Shri. Mohan Shete, Member Coordination : Shri. Pandurang Balkawade, Member Mogal Jadhav Dr Abhiram Dixit, Member Special Officer, History and Civics Shri. Bapusaheb Shinde, Member Varsha Sarode Shri. Balkrishna Chopde, Member Subject Assistant, History and Civics Shri. Prashant Sarudkar, Member Shri. Mogal Jadhav, Member-Secretary Translation : Shri. Aniruddha Chitnis Civics Subject Committee : Shri. Sushrut Kulkarni Dr Shrikant Paranjape, Chairman Smt. Aarti Khatu Prof. Sadhana Kulkarni, Member Scrutiny : Dr Mohan Kashikar, Member Dr Ganesh Raut Shri. Vaijnath Kale, Member Prof. Sadhana Kulkarni Shri. Mogal Jadhav, Member-Secretary Coordination : Dhanavanti Hardikar History and Civics Study Group : Academic Secretary for Languages Shri. Rahul Prabhu Dr Raosaheb Shelke Shri. Sanjay Vazarekar Shri. Mariba Chandanshive Santosh J. Pawar Assistant Special Officer, English Shri. Subhash Rathod Shri. Santosh Shinde Smt Sunita Dalvi Dr Satish Chaple Typesetting : Dr Shivani Limaye Shri.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Maratha Power
    The Rise and Fall of the Maratha Power Modern Indian History Evolution of Peshwaship ❑ Shahu, grandson of Shivaji, had been a prisoner of Aurangzeb since 1689. ❑ Released in 1707 ❑ Soon, a civil war broke out between Shahu (Satara) & his aunt Tara Bai (Kolhapur), who had carried out an anti-Mughal struggle since 1700 in the name of her son Shivaji II after the death of her husband Raja Ram. Evolution of Peshwaship Continued… ❑ Arising out of the conflict between Shahu & his rival, a new system of Maratha government was evolved under the leadership of Balaji Vishwanath, the Peshwa of King Shahu. (1713) Balaji Vishwanath (1713-1720 C.E.) ❑ Balaji Vishwanath, a Brahmin, started his career as a small revenue official. He played a crucial role in the victory of Sahu over Tarabai in the Battle of Khed in 1707 C.E. ❑ After Sahu’s (1707-48 CE) coronation as Chatrapathi at Satara, Balaji was made his Sena Karte (organizer of forces) ❑ In 1713 C.E., he was raised to the post of Peshwa, this marked the domination of Peshwa supremacy in Maratha politics. ❑ Office of Peshwa become hereditary. From now onward Chatrapati become just a figure-head. ❑ He is rightly called as ‘Second founder of Maratha state’. Balaji Vishwanath (1713-1720 C.E.) Continued…. ❑ He was the 1st Maratha official to reach Delhi & involve in the internal matters of the Mughal rulers. ❑ He secured the release of Sahu’s mother. Baji Rao I (1720-1740 C.E.) ❑ Succeeded by his 20-year old son Baji Rao I. ❑ The Maratha power reached its zenith under him.
    [Show full text]
  • Raja Shiv Chhatrapati
    Raja Shiv Chhatrapati 1 Kavi Bhushan’s Poem इंद्र जजमम जंभपर ,बाढव सुअंभ पर, रावन सदंभ पर,रघकु ु ऱराज है ! पौन बाररबाह पर,संभु रतिनाह पर, 煍यⴂ सहसबाह पर,राम 饍ववजराज है ! दावा द्रमु दंड पर,चीिा मगृ झंुड पर, भूषन वविंडु पर,जैसे मगृ राज है ! िेज िम अंस पर,काꅍह जजमम कंस पर, 配यⴂ ममऱ楍छ बंस पर,सेर मसवराज है ! 2 Pre – Shivaji Period 3 Yadavas of Devagiri 4 Annexed by Allauddin Khalji 5 Dark Era • 1294 A.D. Delhi Sultan Allauddin Khalji defeated Ramdev Yadav. • 1313 A.D. Malik Kafur defeated Shankardev Yadav. • 1317 A.D. Kutubuddin Khalji defeated Harpal Dev. Devagiri renamed as Daulatabad. 6 Dark Era.. • 1347 A.D. Alaudin Hasan established Bahamani Sultanate. • 1510 A.D. Portuguese rule established in Gomantak. • Bahamani Sultanate splited into 5 independent Sultanate. • 1565 A.D. Alliance of Adilshahi, Nizamshahi & Qutubshahi defeated Vijaynagar Empire. 7 Saints in Maharashtra 8 Malik Ambar 9 Shahji Raje Bhosale 10 Jijabai 11 Lakhuji Raje Jadhav 12 Shahji’s Struggle • 1629 A.D. Nizamshah assassinated Lakhuji Jadhav in the court. • Shahji Raje left Adilshahi and attempted to establish independent kingdom at Pune. • Adilshahi army destroyed Pune. • Shahji Raje joined Mughal Service. 13 Shivaji’s Birth 14 Shahji’s Struggle • After Malik Ambar’s death Shahji again joined Nizamshahi. • Ruled Nizamshahi with puppet Badshah. • Mughal-Adilshahi allied forces annexed Nizamshah. • Shahji Raje again joined Adilshahi according to treaty. 15 Pune Re-established 16 Training 17 Idea of Hindavi Swarajya • 1640 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Class-8 Subject–History&Civics Chapter–3
    CLASS- 8 SUBJECT – HISTORY & CIVICS CHAPTER – 3 . INDIA IN THE 18TH CENTURY HIGHLIGHTS 1. Decline of the Mughal Empire 2. Successors of Aurangzeb 3. Causes of Downfall of Mughal Empire 4. Rise of the Independent States 5. The Marathas 6. Decline of Maratha Power Decline of the Mughal Empire:- The Mughal Empire founded by Babar led to decline as a result of Aurangzeb’s faulty policies. Aurangzeb was the last Great Mughal emperor and after his death in 1707 started the process of disintegration of this vast empire. After his death there was a war between his three sons and his eldest son Muazzam emerged Victorious and ascended the throne in 1707 with the title of ‘Bahadur shah’. Successors of Aurangzeb:- After the death of Aurangzeb, there were Eleven Mughal rulers who ruled after 1707, five were murdered, three became prisoners, of east India Company, and three ruled in name only. Some of the rulers were Badhadur Shah 1st (1707-1712), Jalandhar Shah (1712-1713), Farukhsiyar (1713- 1719). All these rulers were very weak and were puppets of their powerful wazirs. Causes of Downfall of Mughal Empire: 1. Weakness of the Kings: Most of the later Mughal Emperors lacked administrative qualities and were blindly dependent upon their nobles and wazirs. They were puppets in their hands. 2. War of Succession: There were constant wars between various aspirants to the throne. This severely weakened the empire. 3. Weakness of Mughal Army: The Army was not modernized and the soldiers were indisciplined and lacked courage. 4. Invasions of Nadir shah and Ahmad Shah Abdabli: The invasions weakened the strength of Mughals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maratha Empire of Pune and the Peshwas: an Overview
    Science, Technology and Development ISSN : 0950-0707 The Maratha Empire of Pune and the Peshwas: an overview *Dr.Ramya.K.R. Assistant Professor, Department of History, Government First Grade College ( Autonomous ), Gubbi. Abstract This paper attempts to study how Peshwas who were all ministers who served as the chief executives to the king and later held the highest administrative office and also controlled the Maratha empire . Maratha confederacy, alliance formed in the 18th century after Mughal pressure forced the collapse of Shivaji’s kingdom of Maharashtra in western India. After the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s death (1707), Maratha power revived under Shivaji’s grandson Shahu. He confided power to the Brahman Bhat family, who became hereditary peshwas (chief ministers). He also decided to expand northward with armies under the peshwas’ control. In Shahu’s later years the power of the peshwas increased. After his death (1749) they became the effective rulers. The leading Maratha families—Sindhia, Holkar, Bhonsle, and Gaekwar— extended their conquests in northern and central India and became more independent and difficult to control. The effective control of the peshwas ended with the great defeat of Panipat (1761) at the hands of the Afghans and the death of the young peshwa Madhav Rao I in 1772. Thereafter the Maratha state was a confederacy of five chiefs under the nominal leadership of the peshwa at Poona (now Pune) in western India. Though they united on occasion, as against the British (1775–82), more often they quarreled. After he was defeated by the Holkar dynasty in 1802, the peshwa Baji Rao II sought protection from the British, whose intervention destroyed the confederacy by 1818.
    [Show full text]
  • Maratha Empire the Maratha Empire Dominated a Large Part of the Indian Subcontinent in the 17Th Century
    Maratha Empire The Maratha Empire dominated a large part of the Indian subcontinent in the 17th century. The empire formally existed from 1674 with the coronation of Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj and ended in 1818 with the defeat of Peshwa Bajirao II at the hands of the British East India Company. This article will give further details about the Maratha Empire within the context of the IAS Exam. Origins of the Maratha Empire The origins of the Maratha Empire can be traced back to a series of rebellions led by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj against the rule of the Bijapur Sultanate and later the Mughal Empire. Based on the principle of Hindawi Swarajya, he carved out an independent Maratha ​ ​ kingdom with Raigad as the capital. In 1674, he was crowned Chhatrapati (sovereign) of the new Maratha Kingdom after ​ ​ successfully defending it from Mughal incursions. At the time of his death, the kingdom was defended by a series of forts and well equipped naval establishments. By the time of his grandson’s rule in the early 18th century, the kingdom had increased its size and transformed into a full-fledged empire. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (born on February 19, 1630) was succeeded by his eldest son Sambhaji (also known as Shambhu Raje) in 1681. He continued the expansion policy of his father defeating the Portuguese and Chikka Deva Raya of Mysore to expand his borders. These developments were alarming enough for Mughal Emperor Aurangazeb (born on 3rd November 1618) to launch an expedition against the Marathas. In the 8 years of wars that followed, Shambhu Raje (born on May 14 1657) fought Aurangzeb all along the Deccan region, never losing any battle or his forts.
    [Show full text]
  • [Frontispiece] a HISTORY of the MARATHA PEOPLE
    SHRINIVAS PANDIT PRATINI.DHI [Frontispiece] A HISTORY OF THE MARATHA PEOPLE BY C. A KINCAID, C. V. 0., I. C. S. Author of "Tbe Ia diu Heroes. • "Deeeu M'al"'!ee'J Tales," "Tbe Oatlaws of lathiawar," "Tales from the lodiu Epics, • "Tales of Paadbarpar, • "Sbri l(rlsllaa of Dwarka, • "Tales of liD I Vilaama, • etc., etc. AND RAo BAHADUR D. B. PARASNIS Author of "Tbe Rani of Jhaosi," "M.ahableshwar: etc. Editor "ltibas Saograba" VOL II FROM THE DEATH Of SHIVAJI Tn THE DEATH Of SHAHU HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD ur-.-rrVERSITY PRESS LO}."DON BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS 1922 PRIBTED AT Tmi KANAREBE MISSION PRESS AND BOOK DEPOT, MAN GALORE TO THE MAR.ATHA PEOPLE TffiS WORK IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED PREFACE TO SECOND VOLUME A FEW words only are needed by way of introduction to the Second volume. The main authorities for the lives of Sambhaji and Rajaram are the Chitnis Bakhar, the Shedgavkar Bakhar, Khafi Khan, the Musulman works translated by Scott and known as Scott's Deccan, Orme's Fragments and the Parasnis Papers. I must also express my grateful ac­ knowledgments to Professor Sarkar's History of Aurangzeb, Vol IV, and to Mr. Irvine's translation of the Storia do Mogor. For my account of the Maratha wars against the Portuguese, my warmest thanks are due to the Goa Govern­ ment, who with admirable generosity and kindness sent me a quantity of, specially chosen books and papers on the subject. The authorities for the reign of Shahu are the Chitnis Bakhar, the Peshwa and Shedgavkar Bakhars, the Siyar­ ul-Mutakherin, the Parasnis Papers, Malleson's History of the French in India, Orme, and, above al~ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • BA Semester VI- Maratha History 1707-1818 AD (HISKB 602) Dr. Mukesh
    BA Semester VI- Maratha History 1707-1818 AD (HISKB 602) Dr. Mukesh Kumar (Department of History) KMC Language University Lucknow, U.P.-226013 UNIT-I Chhatrapati Shahu- Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj also known as Rajarshi Shahu was considered a true democrat and social reformer. First Maharaja of the princely state of Kolhapur, he was an invaluable gem in the history of Maharashtra. Greatly influenced by the contributions of social reformer Jyotiba Phule, Shahu Maharaj was an ideal leader and able ruler who was associated with many progressive and path breaking activities during his rule. From his coronation in 1894 till his demise in 1922, he worked tirelessly for the cause of the lower caste subjects in his state. Primary education to all regardless of caste and creed was one of his most significant priorities. He was born Yeshwantrao in the Ghatge family in Kagal village of the Kolhapur district as Yeshwantrao Ghatge to Jaisingrao and Radhabai in June 26, 1874. Jaisingrao Ghatge was the village chief, while his wife Radhabhai hailed from the royal family of Mudhol. Young Yeshwantrao lost his mother when he was only three. His education was supervised by his father till he was 10-year-old. In that year, he was adopted by Queen Anandibai, widow of Kingh Shivaji IV, of the princely state of Kolhapur. Although the adoption rules of the time dictated that the child must have Bhosale dynasty blood in his vein, Yeshwantrao’s family background presented a unique case. He completed his formal education at the Rajkumar College in Rajkot and took lessons of administrative affairs from Sir Stuart Fraser, a representative of the Indian Civil Services.
    [Show full text]