DOCSLIB.ORG

Naamlijst Voor De Nederlandse Carabidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naamlijst Voor De Nederlandse Carabidae) Naamlijst voor de Nederlandse Carabidae) H. Turin TURIN, H., 1990. CHECKLIST OF THE GROUND-BEETLES OF THE NETHERLANDS (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE). - ENT BER., AMST 50 (6): 61-72 Abstract: A new checklist is given for the ground-beetles of the Dutch area. Changes according to faunistic status and nomenclature since the list of Brakman (1966) are commented upon. A reference is given to the list of Brakman. H. Turin, Esdoomdreef 29, 6871 LK Renkum. Inleiding Sedert de publikatie van de Lijst van Coleo- Omdat de laatste tijd juist vanuit Zuideuropa ptera uit Nederland en het omliggende gebied veel belangrijke revisies en tabellen tot ons (Brakman, 1966), is behalve een provisorische komen, lijkt het wenselijk om de soorten per lijst in de Nieuwsbrief van de European Inver¬ genus niet in alfabetische volgorde te presente¬ tebrate Survey (Turin, 1982) geen bijgewerkte ren, maar in systematische volgorde, met ver¬ versie voor de Nederlande loopkevers versche¬ melding van de subgenera. Per subgenus zijn nen. De loopkeveratlas (Turin, Haeck & Hen- de soorten echter wel weer alfabetisch gerang¬ geveld, 1977) volgde nog geheel Brakmans lijst. schikt. Deze vorm maakt een goede aanslui¬ Het ontdekken of het afsplitsen van enkele ting bij de plaatselijke literatuur mogelijk. nieuwe soorten, een enkele taxonomische revi¬ Voor degenen die nog met de lijst van Brak¬ sie en de vele naamsveranderingen rechtvaar¬ man (1966) werken is per soort het nummer uit digen een nieuwe kritische lijst. deze lijst opgenomen. Splitters en lumpers Nomenclatuur In Centraal- en Noordwest Europa volgen de In 1977 publiceerde Silfverberg een aantal carabidologen al heel lang eensgezind een lum- homoniemen betreffende soorten die aanvan¬ perstraditie die vanaf de twintiger j aren tot aan kelijk onder de genusnaam „Carabus” be¬ zijn dood krachtig verdedigd werd door Carl schreven zijn (bijvoorbeeld: Carabus bipustu- Lindroth (Lindroth, 1985, 1986). Deze opvat¬ latus Fabricius, 1775 = Panagaeus en Carabus tingen, waarbij vaak vele op zich goed te on¬ bipustulatus Fabricius, 1792 = Badister). Silf¬ derscheiden soortengroepen in één genus on¬ verberg (1977) paste vervolgens de namen van dergebracht werden, konden en kunnen de junior homoniemen aan. De nomenclatori- rekenen op krachtige ondersteuning van de sche regels die uiteindelijk bedoeld zijn om brede laag van de Noordamerikaanse taxono- stabiliteit te scheppen, zullen bij zoveel wijzi¬ men, wier werk niet onbelangrijk is voor de gingen niet iedereen aanspreken. Omdat er en¬ taxonomie van het Palaearctisch gebied. De kele belangrijke loopkeverpublikaties op sta¬ Franse en meeste Zuideuropese carabidologen pel stonden in diverse landen, heeft een groep werken echter grosso modo volgens het door auteurs waaronder ondergetekende besloten Jeannel (1941-1942) opgestelde systeem, waar¬ zich bij het onvermijdelijke neer te leggen en de bij de Carabidae (s.l.) zijn opgedeeld in een nomenclatuur van Silfverberg te volgen. Hier¬ twintigtal families en waar vele van de traditi¬ onder valt het belangrijke Fennoskandische onele subgenera als genus zijn aangemerkt. determinatiewerk (Lindroth, 1985, 1986), de 62 Ent. Ber., Amst. 50 (1990) Deense loopkeveratlas (Bangsholt, 1983) en de Coleoptera, Carabidae: Nederlandse loopkevertabel (Boeken, 1987). Naamlijst voor Nederland De wijzigingen zijn thans zelfs, zij het met tegenzin, door de redactie van de supplemen¬ BRK: Nummer van de soort in de naamlijst ten van het standaardwerk voor Centraal van Brakman (1966) Europa, ’’Freude-Harde-Lohse” (Lompe, 1989) overgenomen. B: Mate van bedreiging in Denemarken, Ne¬ derland, België en Luxemburg (zie tekst en Desender & Turin, 1986, 1989) Status + - soort gaat in het gebied vooruit In de naamlijst is door een tweetal toegevoegde * - tendens tot toename aanduidingen informatie gegeven over de sta¬ = - geen grote verandering voor het ge¬ tus van de soort in Nederland en het omlig¬ bied als geheel gende gebied. In de eerste kolom staat de in¬ 1 - tendens tot achteruitgang in deel van formatie die geldt voor het gebied van het gebied Denemarken, Nederland, België en Luxem¬ 2 - duidelijke achteruitgang in deel van burg als geheel. De coderingen zijn gebaseerd het gebied op Desender & Turin (1986, 1989). In de 3 - sterke achteruitgang in groot deel van tweede kolom is in een aantal gevallen d.m.v. het gebied een letteraanduiding extra informatie toege¬ 4 - sterke achteruitgang in het gehele ge¬ voegd die alleen op Nederland betrekking bied heeft. Deze gegevens komen eveneens uit voor¬ 0 - niet vermeld in Desender & Turin, noemde publikaties, aangevuld met kennis uit 1986, 1989 het bestand van basisgegevens van de EIS- loopkeverwerkgroepen. De statusaanduidin- S: Status van de soort in Nederland gen voor Nederland zijn voorlopig, maar in I - duidelijke toename (increasing) grote lijnen wel juist. De letters I (increasing) D - duidelijke teruggang (decreasing) en D (decreasing) werden alleen dan vermeld E - waarschijnlijk niet meer in Nederland wanneer er een zeer duidelijke tendens in toe- (extinct) of afname te zien is (Desender & Turin, 1986, 1989). De aanduiding E (extinct) is vermeld bij SUBFAMILIE CICINDELINAE soorten waarvan in ieder geval de laatste 20 jaar geen meldingen zijn binnengekomen. Van GENUS CIŒDELA Linnaeus, 1758 BRK B S enkele van deze soorten is maar een enkele 001 Cicmdela campestris Linnaeus, 1758 004 = D waarneming bekend. Ik ben van mening dat 002 Cicindela germanica Linnaeus, 1758 005 2 soorten waarvan niet tenminste eenmaal een 003 Cicindela hybrida Linnaeus, 1758 002 = D gevestigde populatie in ons gebied is aange¬ 004 Cicindela maritima Latreille & Dejean, 1822 003 1 D toond (zwervers), niet tot de Nederlandse 005 Cicindela sylvatica Linnaeus, 1758 001 3 D fauna gerekend moeten worden. Gedetail¬ * silvatica auctt. leerde gegevens met betrekking tot de faunisti- 006 Cicindela trisignata Latreille & Dejean, 1822 006 = E sche status zullen gepubliceerd worden in de nieuwe loopkeveratlas die de ElS-loopkever- SUBFAMILIE OMOPHRONIAE werkgroep thans in voorbereiding heeft. GENUS 0M0PHR0N Latreille, 1802 007 Omophron limbatum (Fabricius, 1776) 067 = Ent. Bek.3 Amst. 50 (1990) 63 SUBFAMILIE CARABINAE 025 Carabus nemoralis O. F. Mueller, 1764 021 * TRIBUS CARABINI Subgenus Oreocarabus Gehin, 1876 026 Carabus glabratus Paykull, 1790 022 3 E GENUS CALOSOMA Weber, 1801 TRIBUS CYCHRINI Subgenus Calosoma s.str. 008 Calosoma inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758) 023 4 D GENUS CYCHRUS Fabricius, 1794 009 Calosoma sycophanta (Linnaeus, 1758) 024 4 E 027 Cychrus caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758) 007 = Subgenus Campalita Motschulsky, 1865 TRIBUS NEBRIINI 010 Calosoma maderae (Fabricius, 1775) 025 0 E ssp. auropunctatum (Herbst, 1784) GENUS LEISTUS Froehlich, 1799 Subgenus Chrysostigma Kirby, 1837 Subgenus Pogonophorus Latreille, 1802 011 Calosoma reticulatum (Fabricius, 1787) 026 2 E 028 Leistus rufomarginatus (Duftschmid, 1812) 028 * 029 Leistus spinibarbis (Fabricius, 1775) 027 3 GENUS CARABUS Linnaeus, 1758 Subgenus Leistus s.str. Subgenus Procrustes Bonelli, 1809 = Leistophorus Reitter, 1905 012 Carabus coriaceus Linnaeus, 1758 008 = D 030 Leistusferrugineus (Linnaeus, 1758) 031 * 031 Leistus fulvibarbis Dejean, 1826 029 = I Subgenus Megodontus Solier, 1848 032 Leistus terminatus (Hellwig, 1793) 030 * 013 Carabus violacm Linnaeus, 1758 009 = D * rufescens (Fabricius, 1775) ssp purpurascens Fabricius, 1787 GENUS NEBRIA Latreille, 1802 Subgenus Chaetocarabus Thomson, 1875 014 Carabus intricatus Linnaeus, 1761 010 3 E Subgenus Paranebria Jeannel, 1937 033 Nebria bida (Linnaeus, 1758) 033 = Subgenus Chrysocarabus Thomson, 1875 015 Carabus auronitens Fabricius, 1792 011 = Subgenus Nebria s.str. 034 Nebria brevicollis (Fabricius, 1792) 033 + I Subgenus Hadrocarabus Thomson, 1875 035 Nebria salina Fairmaire & Laboulbene, 1854 034 = 016 Carabus problematicus Herbst, 1786 012 * * catenuktus auctt. nec Scopoli, 1763 TRIBUS NOTIOPHILINI Subgenus Carabus s.str. GENUS NOTIOPHILUS Dumeril, 1806 017 Carabus auratus Linnaeus, 1761 013 2 D 036 Notiophilus aestuans Motschulsky, 1864 035 = 018 Carabus cancelhtm Illiger, 1798 018 3 D * pusillus Waterhouse, 1833 019 Carabus clathratus Linnaeus, 1761 017 4 D * aesthuans auctt. 020 Carabus granulatus Linnaeus, 1758 014 * 037 Notiophilus aquaticus (Linnaeus, 1758) 036 = 038 Notiophilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1779) 041 * Subgenus Tomocarabus Reitter, 1896 039 Notiophilus germinyi Fauvel, 1863 038 = 021 Carabus convexus Fabricius, 1775 015 2 D * hypocrita auctt. nec. Putzeys, 1866 040 Notiophilus palustris (Duftschmid, 1812) 037 = Subgenus Hemicarabus Gehin, 1885 041 Notiophilus quadripunctatus Dejean, 1826 042 = = 022 Carabus nitens Linnaeus, 1758 016 3 D 042 Notiophilus rufipes Curtis, 1829 040 043 Notiophilus substriatus Waterhouse, 1833 039 - Subgenus Morphocarabus Gehin, 1885 023 Carabus arvensis Herbst, 1784 019 3 D TRIBUS ELAPHRINI * arcencis (misspelling) 024 Carabus monilis Fabricius, 1792 020 - GENUS BLETHISA Bonelli, 1810 044 Blethisa multipunctata (Linnaeus, 1758) 043 4 Subgenus Archicarabus Seidlitz, 1887 64 Ent. Ber., Amst. 50 (1990) GENUS ELAPHRUS Fabricius, 1775 TRIBUS TRECHINI Subgenus Elaphrus s.str. GENUS PERILEPTUS Schaum, 1860 045 Elaphrus cupreus Duftschmid, 1812 045 4 071 Perileptus areolatus (Creutzer, 1799) 136 = E 046 Elaphrus uliginosus Fabricius, 1792 044 3 GENUS EPAPHWS Stephens, 1827 Subgenus Trichelaphrus Semenow, 1926 072 Epaphius secalis (Paykull, 1790) 137 2 047 Elaphrus riparius (Linnaeus, 1758) 046 * GENUS TRECHUS Clairville, 1806 Subgenus Ebphroterus Semenow, 1895 073 Trechus obtusus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Descent of Man
    THE DESCENT OF MAN, AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX, BY CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S., &c. IN TWO VOLUMES.—VOL. II. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1871. [The right of Translation is reserved.] ERRATA. CONTENTS. PART II. SEXUAL SELECTION-continued. CHAPTER XII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF FISHES, AMPHIBIANS, AND REPTILES. FISHES : Courtship and battles of the males — Larger size of the females — Males, bright colours and ornamental appendages; other strange characters — Colours and appendages acquired by the males during the breeding-season alone — Fishes with both sexes brilliantly coloured — Protective colours — The less con- spicuous colours of the female cannot be accounted for on the principle of protection — Male fishes building nests, and taking charge of the ova and young. AMPHIBIANS : Differences in structure and colour between the sexes — Vocal organs. REP- TILES : Chelonians — Crocodiles — Snakes, colours in some cases protective — Lizards, battles of — Ornamental appendages — Strange differences in structure between the sexes — Colours — Sexual differences almost as great as with birds .. Page 1-37 CHAPTER XIII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF BIRDS. Sexual differences — Law of battle — Special weapons — Vocal organs—Instrumental music — Love-antics and dances — Deco- rations, permanent and seasonal — Double and single annual moults—Display of ornaments by the males .. .. .. 38-98 vi CONTENTS OF VOL. II. CHAPTER XIV. BIRDS—continued. Choice exerted by the female — Length of courtship — Unpaired birds — Mental qualities and taste for the beautiful — Preference or antipathy shewn by the female for particular males — Vari- ability of birds — Variations sometimes abrupt—Laws of varia- tion — Formation of ocelli — Gradations of character — Case of Peacock, Argus pheasant, and Urosticte .
    [Show full text]
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract
    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbance and Recovery of Litter Fauna: a Contribution to Environmental Conservation
    Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Thesis committee PhD promotors Prof. dr. Herbert H.T. Prins Professor of Resource Ecology Wageningen University Prof. dr. Steven de Bie Professor of Sustainable Use of Living Resources Wageningen University PhD supervisor Dr. Frank van Langevelde Assistant Professor, Resource Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members Prof. dr. Lijbert Brussaard, Wageningen University Prof. dr. Peter C. de Ruiter, Wageningen University Prof. dr. Nico M. van Straalen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Prof. dr. Wim H. van der Putten, Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie, Wageningen This research was conducted under the auspices of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School of Production Ecology & Resource Conservation Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation Vincent Comor Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Monday 21 October 2013 at 11 a.m. in the Aula Vincent Comor Disturbance and recovery of litter fauna: a contribution to environmental conservation 114 pages Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2013) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978-94-6173-749-6 Propositions 1. The environmental filters created by constraining environmental conditions may influence a species assembly to be driven by deterministic processes rather than stochastic ones. (this thesis) 2. High species richness promotes the resistance of communities to disturbance, but high species abundance does not.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruzickova 2014
    Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Přírodov ědecká fakulta Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato ř Bc. Jana R ůži čková Porovnání vlivu AEO "úhor" a "neošet řovaný pás" na carabidofaunu polí Diplomová práce v oboru Zoologie Vedoucí práce: RNDr. Milan Veselý, Ph.D. Olomouc 2014 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatn ě pod vedením RNDr. Milana Veselého, Ph.D. a všechny citované zdroje uvádím v seznamu literatury. V Olomouci 30. dubna 2014 ………………………… podpis Pod ěkování V prvé řad ě bych cht ěla pod ěkovat RNDr. Milanovi Veselému, PhD. za vedení práce, kritický pohled a cenné rady. M ůj obrovský dík pat ří taktéž RNDr. Ivanu H. Tufovi, PhD. a Mgr. Honzovi Šipošovi za pomoc se statistickou analýzou. Nesmím opomenout ani všechny sb ěratele dat, svoji rodinu a „kolíky“, bez kterých by se mi pracovalo jen velmi ztuha. A nakonec d ěkuji pardan ům za podporu ve chvílích nejtemn ějších a dugong ům za to, že jsou ozdobou naší planety. Růži čková, J. (2014): Porovnání vlivu AEO "úhor" a "neošet řovaný pás" na carabidofaunu polí. Sou časná zem ědělská politika Evropské unie podporuje opat ření na zvýšení biodiverzity a heterogenity agroekosystém ů. Cílem této práce bylo reáln ě zhodnotit smysluplnost dvou agroenvironmentálních opat ření (úhoru a chemicky neošet řeného pásu plodiny) na st řevlíkovité brouky v polích. Výzkum probíhal b ěhem let 2009 – 2011 na polích na Znojemsku, Královéhradecku a Vyškovsku. Pomocí padacích zemních pastí umíst ěných ve čty řech liniích v různých vzdálenostech od opat ření bylo celkov ě uloveno 58 805 jedinc ů st řevlíkovitých v 99 druzích. Druhová bohatost a po četnost spole čenstva byla nejvyšší v opatření (bez ohledu na typ) a klesala sm ěrem do pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Methods for Rearing Soil Beetles (Coleoptera)
    ZOOLOGICA Bolesław Burakowski Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles (Coleoptera) Polska Akademia Nauk Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Warszawa 1993 http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK MUZEUM I INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA 46 Bolesław Burakowski Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles (Coleopter a) WARSZAWA 1993 http://rcin.org.pl MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA, 46, 1993 World-list abbreviation: Memorabilia Zool. EDITORIAL STAFF Editor — in — chief — Bohdan Pisarski Asistant editor — Wojciech Czechowski Secretary — Katarzyna Cholewicka-Wiśniewska Editor of the volume — Wojciech Czechowski Publisher Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa PL ISSN 0076-6372 ISBN 83-85192-12-3 © Copyright by Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN Warszawa 1993 Nakład 1000 egz. Ark. wyd. 5,5. Ark. druk 4 Druk: Zakład Poligraficzno-Wydawniczy „StangraF’ http://rcin.org.pl Bolesław Bu r a k o w sk i Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles ( Coleoptera) INTRODUCTION Beetles are the most numerous group of insects; nearly 300,000 species have been described up till now, and about 6,000 of these occur in Poland. The morphological variability and different modes of life result from beetle ability to adapt to all kinds of habitats. Terrestrial and soil living forms dominate. Beetles undergo a complete metamorphosis and most species live in soil during at least one of the stages. They include predators, herbivores, parasites and sapro- phagans, playing a fairly significant role in nature and in man’s economy. Our knowledge of beetles, even of the common species, is insufficient. In spite of the fact that the beetle fauna of Central Europe has been studied relatively well, the knowledge accumulated is generally limited to the adults, while the immature stages have not been adequately studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O19749
    Oikos o19749 Gerisch, M., Agostinelli, V., Henle, K. and Dziock, F. 2011. More species, but all do the same: contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. – Oikos 121: 508–515. Appendix A1 Tabelle1 Table A1. Full species list representing the standardized number of individuals per species for the study sites Steckby, Woerlitz, and Sandau. Density expresses the proportion of species standardized abundances to total abundance. Macropterous = winged, brachypterous = wingless, dimorphic = both forms can appear with a species. Body size is the average of maximum and minimum values found in the literature (for references see below). Wing Reproduction Body size Species names Steckby Woerlitz Sandau Density Morphology Season In mm Acupalpus dubius 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 2.6 Acupalpus exiguus 1.838 1.019 0.71 0.005 macropterous spring 2.7 Acupalpus parvulus 0.081 0.038 0.032 0 macropterous spring 3.6 Agonum dolens 0.032 0.038 0.081 0 dimorph spring 8.8 Agonum duftschmidi 14.966 2.755 0.016 0.025 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum emarginatum 116.659 4.472 25.194 0.208 macropterous spring 7.2 Agonum fuliginosum 0.097 0.038 0 0 dimorph spring 6.7 Agonum lugens 0.177 0 0.081 0 macropterous spring 9 Agonum marginatum 0.371 0.075 0.113 0.001 macropterous spring 9.2 Agonum micans 19.502 4.208 23.71 0.067 macropterous spring 6.6 Agonum muelleri 0 0.019 0 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum piceum 0.468 0 0.016 0.001 macropterous spring 6.4 Agonum sexpunctatum 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction Based on Fossil Beetle Faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang Region, China
    Holocene palaeoenvironmental reconstruction based on fossil beetle faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang region, China Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London By Tianshu Zhang February 2018 Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London Declaration of Authorship I Tianshu Zhang hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 25/02/2018 1 Abstract This project presents the results of the analysis of fossil beetle assemblages extracted from 71 samples from two peat profiles from the Halashazi Wetland in the southern Altai region of northwest China. The fossil assemblages allowed the reconstruction of local environments of the early (10,424 to 9500 cal. yr BP) and middle Holocene (6374 to 4378 cal. yr BP). In total, 54 Coleoptera taxa representing 44 genera and 14 families have been found, and 37 species have been identified, including a new species, Helophorus sinoglacialis. The majority of the fossil beetle species identified are today part of the Siberian fauna, and indicate cold steppe or tundra ecosystems. Based on the biogeographic affinities of the fossil faunas, it appears that the Altai Mountains served as dispersal corridor for cold-adapted (northern) beetle species during the Holocene. Quantified temperature estimates were made using the Mutual Climate Range (MCR) method. In addition, indicator beetle species (cold adapted species and bark beetles) have helped to identify both cold and warm intervals, and moisture conditions have been estimated on the basis of water associated species.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Europe: Relict of Ancient Distribution Or a Result of Range Expansion?
    Title New, north-easternmost locality for Bembidion monticola Sturm, 1825 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Europe: relict of ancient distribution or a result of range expansion? Authors Kovalenko, YN; Telnov, Dmitry Date Submitted 2019-07-12 © Entomologica Fennica. 7 September 2018 New, north-easternmost locality for Bembidion monticola Sturm, 1825 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Europe: relict of ancient distribution or a result of range expansion? Yakov N. Kovalenko & Dmitry Telnov Kovalenko, Ya. N. & Telnov, D. 2018: New, north-easternmost locality for Bem- bidion monticola Sturm, 1825 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Europe: relict of an- cient distribution or a result of range expansion? Entomol. Fennica 29: 119 124. A new record of a subpopulation of Bembidion monticola Sturm, 1825 from Arkhangelsk region (Northern Europe, Russia) is discussed. The locality of this record is remote, about 700 km to the east from the northernmost previously known locality of this species. Ecology and distribution of B. monticola in north- ern Europe are reviewed, as well as possible ways of its spread further to north- east are hypothesised. Ya. N. Kovalenko, Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Acad- emy of Sciences, 33 Leninskiy prosp., 119071, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] D. Telnov, Dârza iela 10, Stopiòu novads, LV-2130, Dzidriòas, Latvia. E-mail: [email protected] Received 7 September 2017, accepted 26 January 2018 1. Introduction Previously published subpopulations of B. monticola monticola in Northern Europe lie far to Bembidion monticola Sturm, 1825 is a European the south-west of the Pinezhsky Nature reserve, boreo-montane ground beetle species distributed and are generally close to the Baltic Sea basin in several mountain systems of Europe and the (Lindroth 1985, 1988, Venn & Kankare 2005) Caucasus, as well as on the Northern European (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity
    Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het college van decanen en ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de biologie aan de Universiteit Gent op gezag van de rector prof. dr. Anne De Paepe, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 augustus 2014 om 10.30 uur precies door Catharina Gesina Elisabeth van Noordwijk geboren op 9 februari 1981 te Smithtown, USA Promotoren: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the XIV European Carabidologists Meeting, Westerbork, 14-18 September, 2009”, Vol
    18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 FINANCIAL SUPPORT We thank all the partners who provided their technical and financial support for the organisation of the 18th European Carabidologist Meeting: … 18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 SCIENTIFIC BOARD President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Manuel PLANTEGENEST, Agrocampus-ouest, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Marc Dufrêne, Liege University - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium Lovei Gabor, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark Guénola Péres, Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR SAS, Rennes, France Julien Pétillon, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes, France Roberto Pizzoloto, Università della Calabria – Dept. B.E.S.T., Rende, Italy David Renault, Université Rennes 1, UMR Ecobio, Rennes, France Pavel Saska, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republik Lucija Šerić Jelaska, Croatian Ecological Society, Zagreb, Croatia José Serrano, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain John Spence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Yann Tricault, Agrocampus Ouest, UMR IGEPP, Angers, France STEERING COMMITTEE President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes Secretary: Isabelle BAUMGARTEN, Agrocampus-ouest, Rennes Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Françoise Burel, CNRS, UMR Ecobio, Rennes El Aziz Djoudi, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes Romain
    [Show full text]