DOCSLIB.ORG

Analize 11 Final.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analize 11 Final.Pdf f P a g e | 1 Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies is an on-line, open access, peer- reviewed international journal that aims to bring into the public arena new ideas and findings in the field of gender and feminist studies and to contribute to the gendering of the social, economic, cultural and political discourses and practices about today’s local, national, regional and international realities. Edited by the The Romanian Society for Feminist Analyses AnA, the journal intends to open conversations among eastern and non-eastern feminist researchers on the situated nature of their feminism(s) and to encourage creative and critical feminist debates across multiple axes of signification such as gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, ethnicity, religion, etc. The journal publishes studies, position papers, case studies, viewpoints, book reviews from practitioners of all grades and professions, academics and other specialists on the broad spectrum of gender and feminist studies. © 2018 AnA Society for Feminist Analyses New Series. Issue No. 11 (25)/2018 Website: www.analize-journal.ro Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editors: Scientific Committee: Laura Grünberg Adriana Baban University of Bucharest, Romania. Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania. Diana Elena Neaga Ionela Băluţă Nicolae Titulescu University, Romania. University of Bucharest, Romania. Valentin Nicolescu Maria Bucur NSPSPA, Romania. Indiana University, USA. Krasimira Daskalova Editorial Secretariat: University of Sofia, Bulgaria. Ana-Maria Despoiu Jasmina Lukić CEU, Hungary. Linguistic Revisions: Mihaela Miroiu Alina Petra Marinescu NSPSPA, Romania. Liliana Popescu Editorial Address: NSPSPA, Romania. 24 Bd. Ferdinand, ap. 11, 021391, Iztok Šori District 2, Bucharest, Romania Peace Institute, Slovenia. [email protected] Mieke Verloo [email protected] University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Enikő Vincze Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania. Cover image: Artist Alina Marinescu. Photograph by Cătălin Georgescu. Cover design: Gabriela Mateescu Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 3 Table of contents ARTICLES Daniela CUTAȘ (coordinator) Editorial: On Love........................................................................................................................................5 Brook SADLER Love as Emotion and Social Practice: A Feminist Perspective................................................................16 Justin Leonard CLARDY ‘I Don’t Want To be a Playa No More’: An Exploration of the Denigrating Effects of ‘Player’ as a Stereotype Against African American Polyamorous Men......................................................................38 Elizabeth BRAKE Do Subversive Weddings Challenge Amatonormativity? Polyamorous Weddings and Romantic Love Ideals...........................................................................................................................................................61 Oana UIOREAN Love as an Instrument of Oppression: Plato’s Symposium and Contemporary Gender Relations.....................................................................85 Delphine JACOBS and Kristien HENS Love, Neuro-Parenting and Autism: from Individual to Collective Responsibility towards Parents and Children.............................................................................................................................................102 Deidre Nicole GREEN The Freedom to Love: On the Unclaimability of (Maternal) Love.......................................................125 Michelle CIURRIA Falling in Love and Breaking Up: Attribution Bias and the Perception of Responsibility...........................................................................................................................................150 Anca GHEAUȘ Love, not the family..................................................................................................................................168 Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 4 Chiara PIAZZESI, Martin BLAIS, Julie LAVIGNE, Catherine LAVOIE MONGRAIN Contemporary Western Love Narratives and Women in TV Series: A Case Study............................177 Ana Cristina SANTOS Repronormativity and its Others: Queering Parental Love in Times of Culturally Compulsory Reproduction............................................................................................................................................199 Maria Henriete POZSAR, Alina Ioana DUMITRESCU, Denisa PITICAS, Sorana CONSTANTINESCU Dating Apps in the Lives of Young Romanian Women. A Preliminary Study..........................................................................................................................................................216 Heather STEWART Parents of “Pets?” A Defense of Interspecies Parenting and Family Building.....................................................................................................................................................239 BOOK REVIEW Frank ELBERS Translocal Childhoods and Family Mobility in East and North Europe. Assmuth L., Hakkarainen M., Lulle A., Siim P.M. (coord.). Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018...............................................................264 Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 5 Editorial: On Love Daniela CUTAȘ Umeå University, University of Gothenburg [email protected] What is love? Is it an uncontrollable emotion? Is it, instead, socially shaped, both an emotion and a social practice? Can the bonds of care and affection between humans and non-human animals be said to be on a par with parent-child relationships between humans? Do parents owe love to their children – and do mothers and fathers, respectively, owe it to different degrees? Do subversive weddings challenge normative ideals about love? What is the significance of love for the value of close personal or family relationships? All these questions and more are discussed in the articles included in this special issue. The contributors draw from a variety of disciplines including philosophy, sociology, political science, religious studies, and history, as well as from empirical work that they have undertaken in Canada, Belgium, Portugal, or Romania. From these different perspectives and experiences, each contribution addresses important questions about love and its relation to sexuality, monogamy, friendship, the family, parenthood, or society in general. The theme From the balance between moral agency and uptake of responsibility for love’s beginning and its ending (Ciurria 2018), to ambivalence in the face of innovations in ways of looking for love (Pozsar et al 2018), this special issue explores love and its challenges in the contemporary world. Several of the contributions address the way in which love has been used to keep women’s interests subsumed to those of their male partners (Uiorean 2018, Sadler 2018) or those of their children (Jacobs & Hens 2018, Green 2018). This has often been accomplished with the support of the expectation that (heterosexual) romantic love is essential for women’s fulfillment. By placing the nuclear family, created by romantic love, in the center of our adult lives, all other loves are moved to the sides. Against this background, the authors of the articles included in this special issue contribute to ‘rehabilitating’ other instantiations of love that are either non-romantic (Gheaus Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 6 2018, Piazzesi et al 2018), non-monogamous (Brake 2018, Clardy 2018), non-heterosexual (Santos 2018), or altogether cross-species (Stewart 2018). The belief that a heterosexual romantic relationship is essential for human flourishing has a name, ‘amatonormativity’, coined by philosopher Elizabeth Brake. The term denotes the assumption that a central, exclusive, amorous relationship is normal for humans, in that it is a universally shared goal, and that such a relationship is normative, in the sense that it should be aimed at in preference to other relationship types. The assumption that valuable relationships must be marital or amorous devalues friendships and other caring relationships. (Brake 2012: 88-89). Research on friendship between adults confirms the surrender to the social script of the primacy of the family over friendship that takes place in many adults’ lives. For example, a recent study of friendship between men in Sweden found that although they valued their friendships greatly, they felt they had to negotiate partial withdrawals from them once they embarked on a serious (heterosexual) romantic relationship (Goedecke 2018). Even as it has become socially acceptable that one will have several romantic partners in one’s lifetime, these are still one’s “other halves”, “significant others”, or “soulmates” – at least until proven otherwise. Friends, on the other hand, are not – at least not as adults, and even when one has had one enduring close friend for life and multiple, serial romantic “other halves”. If the form of elective family that is the romantic relationship has dissolved, the relationship is said to have “failed” and we were simply mistaken to have started it in the first place: our other half was not our other half after all. Friendship, on the other hand, tends to lack both this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neoliberalism, Homonormativity & Ace Discourse
    Extensive notes on some aspects of... Extensive notes on some aspects of... ... Neoliberalism, Homonormativity & Ace Discourse ...Neoliberalism,...Neoliberalism, ( July, 2016 ) HomonormativityHomonormativity && AceAce DiscourseDiscourse Please copy and distribute freely. July, 2016 ( Printable pdf & read-onscreen versions available. ) rotten-zucchinis.tumblr.com/nb [email protected] 2-page ( double-sided ) leaflet version also available. inside front cover page 1 Context— Me & This Zine: Table of Contents (continued next page): I’m a 30-something queer asexual aromantic dyadic non-binary freak of the hyper-educated sort-of Jewish, white Context— Me & This Zine......................................inside front cover person variety. I’m aroace. And I like it that way. I don’t do the romance / dating thing and I really never have. My life is Content Warnings..................................................inside front cover shaped by intense non-normative relationships ( that I do with Acknowledgement...............................................inside front cover other rainbow freaks ). I hail from a large Canadian city where I spend a lot of time hanging out with my best-cat-friend... and Introduction........................................................................................4 where I'm very involved in my local ace community. I've been involved in ace community for most of its 1) “Sexual Orientation” in ( Neoliberal ) Sexual Orientation existence ( because the community didn't really coalesce as a Identity Politics.......................................................................6 community . There are a lot of things about ace discourse that I Sexual orientation as an inherent characteristic of find useful and conceptually very powerful. There are also a lot persons ( i.e., the basis of neoliberal sexual orientation of things about how it plays out that I find intensely frustrating.
    [Show full text]
  • J Oral History Interview on Love
    Houston Asian American Archive (HAAA) Chao Center for Asian Studies Interviewer: Ann Shi Interviewee: J Date of Interview: Dec 15, 2020 Transcript by: Ann Shi Audio length: 1:02:23 Background: J (they/them) is Korean who lives in Seoul, Korea. They believe in a non-amatonormative approach towards love and relationships where one relationship (whether it’s friendship or romantic relationship) does not take priority over another. J has been self-identified as AMAB1 neutrois since 2016 and they are currently around 30 years old. J and their partner (who is gender fluid) are also asexual— sexual activity is not a priority for them; their connection is experienced more at levels of mutual understanding and shared values. The interview went through some of J’s journey in forming their values towards relationships and love, their relationship with family, and their advocacy for trans rights and feminism rights as part of the “Trans Liberation Front” organization. Setting: This interview happened via Zoom and is an audio only interview. This interview is part of the HAAA Love Stories special collection. Key: AS: Ann Shi J: J Interview Transcript: AS: Today is December 15, 2020, my name is Ann Shi. I'm with the Houston Asian American Archive. Today we have J, whose pronoun is they/them, who will be sharing their perspectives with us on love and gender identity surrounding non-amatonormativity— a term coined by Professor Elizabeth Brake, who is a Professor of Philosophy at Rice University. This interview is for the archive’s “Modern Asian in love” podcast in the “Asian Diaspora in Houston” series.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Pacific Division Meeting Program 2017
    The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION NINETY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM THE WESTIN SEATTLE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON APRIL 12 – 15, 2017 VIVA VOCE ENTANGLEMENTS Conversations with A System of Philosophy Italian Philosophers Crispin Sartwell Silvia Benso CENTERING NEO-CONFUCIAN AND EXTENDING ECOLOGICAL HUMANISM NEW FORMS An Essay on An Interpretive Engage- OF REVOLT Metaphysical Sense ment with Wang Fuzhi Essays on Kristeva’s Steven G. Smith (1619–1692) Intimate Politics Nicholas S. Brasovan Sarah K. Hansen and Available May 2017 Rebecca Tuvel, editors EDGAR ALLAN POE, Available June 2017 EUREKA, AND GOD AND THE SELF SCIENTIFIC IN HEGEL CONFUCIANISM, A IMAGINATION Beyond Subjectivism HABIT OF THE HEART David N. Stamos Paolo Diego Bubbio Bellah, Civil Religion, Available July 2017 and East Asia SELF-REALIZATION Philip J. Ivanhoe and THROUGH CONFUCIAN ZHUANGZI’S CRITIQUE Sungmoon Kim, editors LEARNING OF THE CONFUCIANS A Contemporary Blinded by the Human ESSAYS ON THE FOUN- Reconstruction of Kim-chong Chong DATIONS OF ETHICS Xunzi’s Ethics Siufu Tang WHITEHEAD’S C. I. Lewis RELIGIOUS THOUGHT John Lange, editor From Mechanism to Available June 2017 POETIC FRAGMENTS Organism, From Force Karoline von Günderrode to Persuasion THE VARIETY OF Translated and with Daniel A. Dombrowski INTEGRAL ECOLOGIES Introductory Essays by Nature, Culture, Anna C. Ezekiel CONFUCIANISM AND and Knowledge AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY in the Planetary Era MOUNTAINS, RIVERS, Mathew A. Foust Sam Mickey, Sean Kelly, AND THE GREAT EARTH and Adam Robbert, Reading
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of LGBTQIA Terms
    Glossary of LGBTQIA Terms These are terms commonly used by LGBTQIA people and their Allies. A note about these definitions: Each of these definitions has been carefully researched and closely analyzed from theoretical and practical perspectives for cultural sensitivity, common usage, and general appropriateness. We have done our best to represent the most popular uses of the terms listed; however there may be some variation in definitions depending on location. Please note that each person who uses any or all of these terms does so in a unique way (especially terms that are used in the context of an identity label). If you do not understand the context in which a person is using one of these terms, it is always appropriate to ask. This is especially recommended when using terms that we have noted that can have a derogatory connotation. ******************************************************************************************** Ace – Someone who identifies as asexual. Ag / Aggressive – A term used by people of color to describe a masculine lesbian. Also known as „stud.‟ Agender – A person without gender. An agender individual‟s body does not necessarily correspond with their lack of gender identity. Often, agender individuals are not concerned with their physical sex, but some may seek to look androgynous. [Related Terms: neutrois, genderless, gender neutral] Alloromantic – Someone who is not on the aromantic spectrum. Allosexual – Someone who is not on the asexual spectrum. Ally – 1. Someone who actively confronts heterosexism, anti- LGBTQ biases, heterosexual and cisgender privilege in themselves and others 2. Has concern for the well being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, intersex, queer, and other similarly identified people 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Amatonormativity, Non-Monogamy & Relationship Anarchy CJ & Sarah
    Amatonormativity, Non-monogamy & Relationship Anarchy CJ & Sarah *with ASL interpretation* • Aro-friendly session on amatonormativity, non-monogamy, relationship anarchy • This workshop defines and discusses more in-depth concepts of amatonormativity (e.g., social privileging of romantic relationships), non-monogamy and relationship anarchy from an aro-friendly perspective. It also explores non-normative ways of doing relationships, such as relationships that are sometimes called “queerplatonic”/”quirkyplatonic” --------------- Outline: 1. Question: What are social expectations of relationships (5 mins?) 2. Collaboratively define terms: (10 mins) • Heteronormativity • Amatonormativity • Compulsory sexuality • Homonormativity • Monogamy • Asexualisation and complexity of intersectionality 3. Question: What are some ways people here are challenging societal relationship norms? • What kind of struggles or resistance do people face colliding with these relationship norms? 4. Collaboratively define terms: • Non-monogamy & polyamory • Polynormativity • Relationship anarchy • Issues with relationship anarchy • QPRs 5. Question: • How do you relate to any of these ideas? • Positive or negative experiences with non-monogamy, RA, QPR’s? • How has amatonormativity affected how you do significant relationships? • What do you want in your significant relationships? What makes a relationship “significant”? Notes: 1. Question: What are social expectations of relationships (5 mins?) 2. Collaboratively define terms: (10 mins) Heteronormativity • Large structural system of power structuring society around heterosexuality and heterosexual marriage as the basis for the nuclear family, which is the basic “consumer unit” in a capitalist society • In this social context marriage is supposed to be based on romantic-sexual love • Participation is “compulsory” and children are trained and conscripted into heterosexuality from very young; and “regulated” through the violence of homophobia & heterosexism • Creates a system of exactly 2 opposing genders-- man-woman; mav vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Professional Women: a Global Phenomenon Challenges and Opportunities Linda Berg-Cross
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 5 | Issue 5 Article 3 Jun-2004 Single Professional Women: A Global Phenomenon Challenges and Opportunities Linda Berg-Cross Anne-Marie Scholz JoAnne Long Ewa Grzeszcyk Anjali Roy Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Berg-Cross, Linda; Scholz, Anne-Marie; Long, JoAnne; Grzeszcyk, Ewa; and Roy, Anjali (2004). Single Professional Women: A Global Phenomenon Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(5), 34-59. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss5/3 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2004 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Single Professional Women: A Global Phenomenon Challenges and Opportunities By Linda Berg-Crossi, Anne-Marie Scholz, JoAnne Long, Ewa Grzeszcyk, Anjali Roy Abstract This paper presents the globalization of elite single professional women (SPW) as the first new global sociological phenomenon of the twenty-first century. We trace the economic roots of the phenomenon and how female empowerment interacts with the psychological prerequisites for mating. We then trace how the phenomenon is being expressed outside of the United States, in India, Poland, and Germany. We conclude by putting these observations into a historical perspective and briefly listing possible strategies for responding, adapting, and maximizing one’s options.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions: Social Structures & Relationships
    Ace Toronto (acetoronto.wordpress.com) in co-operation with HamOnt Aces (www.facebook.com/hamontaces/) Definitions: Social Structures & Relationships Heteronormativity: Heteronormativity is the culmination of compulsory heterosexuality, homophobia and heterosexism. It is the system of power that privileges heterosexuality, heterosexual romantic-sexual love and/or marriage as normal and necessary. It structures society around the (heterosexual) “nuclear family” as the basic “consumer unit” in a capitalist society. It also constitutes and enforces the socially constructed binary gender system and associated gender roles: the idea that there are exactly two genders— man and woman; where men are supposed to be “masculine” and women “feminine”— and where men and masculinity are prioritised over women and femininity. Compulsory Heterosexuality: Compulsory heterosexuality is the patriarchal presumption that heterosexuality is the normal and necessary default of all individuals in society. It imposes a “heterosexual lens” on all individuals throughout all aspects of life, beginning in early childhood. This system imposes the coercive violence of homophobia and heterosexism in order to “make people” be straight (or try to be straight, regardless of personal feelings). [Heterosexism takes heterosexuality as the taken-for-granted “ideal” while implicitly or explicitly devaluing other ways of being.] Note: The term became popular after Adrienne Rich's 1980 essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and the Lesbian Existence” which focused on women's experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretty Princess Day
    Pretty Princess Day Rebecca Dietsch __________________Cast of Characters _________CHRISTINA: hopelessly in love with Michael, bridesmaid of Heather ____GREY: head of catering, has a crush on Heather. _______MICHAEL: ex-groom. ______TAYLOR: best friend of Heather. Loyal, steadfast, hates Michael _______HEATHER: bride. 1. SCENE_______ 1 HEATHER'S apartment. HEATHER is putting things in a box for MICHAEL. MICHAEL I can't remember which forks were yours. HEATHER Yeah, they're all kind of just silver. You can take them all. MICHAEL What am I going to do with forty forks? HEATHER I can donate them? MICHAEL You need some forks. HEATHER I still have the blue set from the shower. MICHAEL Heather, you have to return those. HEATHER Um- MICHAEL You have to send back all the gifts. HEATHER I hear you. MICHAEL I can do it, if that's easier. HEATHER No need. MICHAEL Right. I think that's the last of it. Thanks for letting me take the futon. HEATHER I'm going to redecorate anyways. The old furniture didn't really go. Oh wait. She hands him a ring box. Created using Celtx 2. MICHAEL Keep that. HEATHER I don't really want to. MICHAEL You could sell it. HEATHER I don't really want to go to different pawn shops trying to sell an old engagement ring. MICHAEL The internet? HEATHER That's a depressing listing to write. MICHAEL I can sell it and send you a check. HEATHER No thanks. MICHAEL You want to get lunch or something? HEATHER I have to see Grey. MICHAEL The color? HEATHER The caterer.
    [Show full text]
  • Amatonormativity, Aromanticism, and What Defines a Relationship
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 5-12-2020 Amatonormativity, Aromanticism, and What Defines a Relationship Rilee Granger Bridgewater State University Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Granger, Rilee. (2020). Amatonormativity, Aromanticism, and What Defines a Relationship. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 330. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/330 Copyright © 2020 Rilee Granger This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Amatonormativity, Aromanticism, and What Defines a Relationship Rilee Granger Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in English Bridgewater State University May, 12, 2020 Dr. Garrett W. Nichols, Thesis Advisor Intro Romance is seen in many aspects of western culture, from movies and tv, to songs and language, but beliefs about romance go beyond what is portrayed in the media. Portrayals of romance with the marriage plot in movies show the underlying belief that romance is a goal everyone is striving towards. This belief that all people are striving towards an exclusive, romantic coupling is called amatonormativity. Professor Elizabeth Brake coined the term amatonormativity and defines it as “the assumption that a central, exclusive, amorous relationship is normal for humans, in that it is a universally shared goal, and that such a relationship is normative, in that it should be aimed at in preference to other relationship types. The assumption that valuable relationships must be marital or amorous devalues friendships and other caring relationships” (Brake 89).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Marriage: Joanne Payton
    ‘Honour’ and the political economy of marriage Joanne Payton Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD, 2015 i DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed (candidate) Date: 13 April 2015 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed (candidate) Date: 13 April 2015 STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed (candidate) Date: 13 April 2015 STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed (candidate) Date: 13 April 2015 Summary ‘Honour’-based violence (HBV) is defined as a form of crime, predominantly against women, committed by the agnates of the victim, often in collaboration, which are justified by the victims’ perceived violation of social norms, particularly those around sexuality and gender roles. While HBV is often considered as a cultural phenomenon, I argue that the cross-cultural distribution of crimes fitting this definition prohibits a purely cultural explanation. I advance an alternate explanation for HBV through a deployment of the cultural materialist strategy and the anthropological theories of Pierre Bourdieu, Claude Lévi-Strauss (as interpreted by Gayle Rubin) and Eric Wolf.
    [Show full text]
  • Sologamie En Feminisme: Een Tegenstrijdig Huwelijk Een Exploratie Van Het Feministische Karakter En Het Subversieve Potentieel Van Zelfhuwelijken
    Masterproef voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Master in Gender en Diversiteit Sologamie en feminisme: een tegenstrijdig huwelijk Een exploratie van het feministische karakter en het subversieve potentieel van zelfhuwelijken Academisch artikel Aantal woorden: 9927 Eva Saelens Studentennummer: 01402250 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Chia Longman Masterproefbegeleider: Dra. Amal Miri Academiejaar 2018-2019 Ingediend op 28 mei 2019 Deze masterproef is een examendocument dat niet werd gecorrigeerd voor eventueel vastgestelde fouten. In publicaties mag naar dit werk worden gerefereerd, mits schriftelijke toelating van de promotor(en) die met naam op de titelpagina is vermeld. Dankwoord Met het schrijven van dit dankwoord, leg ik inmiddels de laatste hand aan mijn masterproef, het sluitstuk van een boeiende opleiding in gender en diversiteit. Dankzij de steun en hulp van een aantal mensen heb ik dit alles tot een goed einde kunnen brengen. Eerst en vooral wil ik graag mijn ouders bedanken voor de kans die ze me gaven om deze opleiding te volgen. Ook de onophoudelijke steun die ze me altijd geboden hebben, vormde een belangrijke drijfveer voor mij om niet teleur te stellen en te volharden in moeilijke periodes. Daarnaast wil ik ook mijn zus bedanken voor het vertrouwen in mij en het nauwlettend nalezen van deze masterproef. Ten tweede wil ik ook graag mijn promotor, prof. dr. Chia Longman, bedanken voor de vrijheid die ze me gaf om te werken rond dit onderwerp. Met behulp van een open en ongedwongen, maar toch richtinggevend gesprek, kon ik het thema -wat op het eerste gezicht geen vanzelfsprekend onderwerp lijkt voor een masterproef- toch de nodige academische diepgang geven.
    [Show full text]
  • Analize 11 2019.Pdf
    f P a g e | 1 Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies is an on-line, open access, peer- reviewed international journal that aims to bring into the public arena new ideas and findings in the field of gender and feminist studies and to contribute to the gendering of the social, economic, cultural and political discourses and practices about today’s local, national, regional and international realities. Edited by the The Romanian Society for Feminist Analyses AnA, the journal intends to open conversations among eastern and non-eastern feminist researchers on the situated nature of their feminism(s) and to encourage creative and critical feminist debates across multiple axes of signification such as gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, ethnicity, religion, etc. The journal publishes studies, position papers, case studies, viewpoints, book reviews from practitioners of all grades and professions, academics and other specialists on the broad spectrum of gender and feminist studies. © 2018 AnA Society for Feminist Analyses New Series. Issue No. 11 (25)/2018 Website: www.analize-journal.ro Analize – Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies • New Series • Issue No. 11/ 2018 P a g e | 2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editors: Scientific Committee: Laura Grünberg Adriana Baban University of Bucharest, Romania. Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania. Diana Elena Neaga Ionela Băluţă Nicolae Titulescu University, Romania. University of Bucharest, Romania. Valentin Nicolescu Maria Bucur NSPSPA, Romania. Indiana University, USA. Krasimira Daskalova Editorial Secretariat: University of Sofia, Bulgaria. Ana-Maria Despoiu Jasmina Lukić CEU, Hungary. Linguistic Revisions: Mihaela Miroiu Alina Petra Marinescu NSPSPA, Romania. Liliana Popescu Editorial Address: NSPSPA, Romania. 24 Bd.
    [Show full text]