October 29, 2010 Mr. Edward Hampston, P.E. New York State

October 29, 2010

Mr. Edward Hampston, P.E. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation Remedial Bureau D – 12th Floor 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-7013

Re: Former Paragon Oil Terminal and the 100-120 Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint Section – Brooklyn, New York Quarterly Status Report July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010

Dear Mr. Hampston:

The Benham Companies, LLC (Benham), on behalf of Texaco Inc. (Texaco), respectfully submit to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) this Quarterly Status Report for the third quarter of 2010. This report covers activities performed at the above- referenced sites from July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010.

If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this report, please do not hesitate to contact either Ms. G. M. Harris of Chevron Environmental Management Company on behalf of Texaco at 770-984-4190 or Mr. Peter Cagnetta of Benham at 717-901-8841.

Sincerely,

The Benham Companies, LLC

Peter J. Cagnetta, CPSS Senior Project Manager/Soil Scientist

PJC:pr cc: G.M. Harris (Texaco) Neil Fletcher (Texaco) Stan Luckoski (Texaco) Jerry Ross (Pillsbury) Sal Geneva (Empire Merchants) Steve Russo (SPR) Steve Malinowski (CA Rich) Justin Kennedy (Roux) Steve Trifiletti (ExxonMobil) Nick Onufrak (BP) Joe White (NYSDEC) Kevin Lumpe (Steel Equities) Olivia Morales (Brooklyn Public Library)

The Benham Companies, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com

QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT FOR THE FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL AND THE 100-120 APOLLO STREET PROPERTY GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK JULY 1, 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 FACILITY #304209

Prepared for:

Texaco Inc. 2300 Windy Ridge Parkway Suite 575 S Atlanta, Georgia 30339

Prepared by:

The Benham Companies, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112

October 29, 2010

The Benham Companies, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 2.0 Landside Recovery System ...... 2 2.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Operations ...... 2 2.1.1 July 2010 ...... 2 2.1.2 August 2010 ...... 3 2.1.3 September 2010 ...... 4 2.1.4 Groundwater Capture Analysis ...... 4 2.2 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance ...... 5 2.3 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring ...... 6 2.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ...... 6 2.5 Short Term Pilot Test ...... 7 2.6 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance ...... 8 2.7 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...... 9 3.0 Newtown Creek Containment System ...... 10 3.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal ...... 10 3.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property ...... 11 3.3 Monthly Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing ...... 11 3.4 Containment and Absorption System Enhancements ...... 12 4.0 Site Characterization Activities ...... 13 4.1 Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging ...... 13 4.2 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event...... 13 4.3 Ambient Air Monitoring ...... 14

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 2 - October 29, 2010

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map ...... Following Text Figure 2 Location of Total Fluids Recovery System ...... Following Text Figure 3 Total Fluids Recovery System Process Flow Schematic ...... Following Text Figure 4 Recovered PSH and Maintenance Timeline ...... Following Text Figure 5 Cumulative and Weekly PSH Recovered October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2010 ...... Following Text Figure 6 Interpreted Capture Zone, Pumping at High Tide, September 21, 2010 at 8:20 ...... Following Text Figure 7 Interpreted Capture Zone, Pumping at Low Tide, September 21, 2010 at 14:35 ...... Following Text Figure 8a Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 8b Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 9 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...... Following Text Figure 10 Sub-Slab Depressurization System Process Flow Schematic ...... Following Text Figure 11 Plan View of Boom Containment and Absorption System ...... Following Text Figure 12 Boom Containment Compartments 1 to 4 Photo Compilation ...... Following Text Figure 13 Boom Containment Compartment 5 Photo Compilation ...... Following Text Figure 14 Boom Containment Compartments SE1 to SE3 Photo Compilation ...... Following Text

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis, September 14, 2007 through September 30, 2010 ...... Following Text Table 2 Total Fluids Recovery System Operation ...... Following Text Table 3 Summary of Individual Well Flow-Rates ...... Following Text Table 4 Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring Wells ...... Following Text Table 5 Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Recovery Wells ...... Following Text Table 6 NYCDEP Permit Compliance Discharge Sampling Results ...... Following Text Table 7 Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Sampling Results ...... Following Text Table 8 Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System Monitoring Results ...... Following Text Table 9 Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities - Paragon Site ...... Following Text Table 10 Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities - Apollo Street Site ...... Following Text Table 11 Summary of Ambient Air Monitoring, August 21-22, 2010 ...... Following Text

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 3 - October 29, 2010

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Treated Groundwater Discharge Permit ...... Following Text Appendix B Recovered Fluids Transportation and Recycling Documentation ...... Following Text Appendix C Weekly Well Gauging Sheets ...... Following Text Appendix D Spent Carbon Bill of Lading ...... Following Text Appendix E Completed Boom Inspection Forms ...... Following Text

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1 Groundwater Contour Map, August 24, 2010 ...... In Back Pocket Plate 2 PSH Thickness and Extent, August 24, 2010 ...... In Back Pocket

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 1 - October 29, 2010

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Benham Companies, LLC (Benham), on behalf of Texaco Inc. (Texaco), respectfully submit to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) this Quarterly Status Report for the activities performed at the former Paragon Oil Terminal property (Paragon site) and the adjacent 100-120 Apollo Street property (Apollo Street site). The Paragon site is located at 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street, Brooklyn, New York. Figure 1 presents the regional site setting and identifies the site. The Paragon Oil Company operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1934 to 1958, and Texaco operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1958 to 1968. Neither the Paragon Oil Company nor Texaco ever owned or maintained operations on the Apollo Street site. In May 2009, Texaco signed an amended Order on Consent Case No. D2-1111-01-09AM for the implementation of site-wide corrective action on both properties. This report summarizes activities completed from July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010.

The Benham Companies, LLC

Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 2 - October 29, 2010

2.0 LANDSIDE RECOVERY SYSTEM

This section presents operational details concerning the performance, maintenance, and monitoring of the Total Fluids Recovery (TFR) system, which was made operational on September 14, 2007. The TFR system is currently in operation at the bulkheads bordering Newtown Creek on both the Paragon and Apollo Street sites, at the location of a historical phase- separated hydrocarbon (PSH) seep through the bulkhead. Figure 2 presents the location of the TFR system. The primary objective of the TFR system has been to stop the seep of PSH and sheens into Newtown Creek. The TFR system has been successful at stopping the seep of PSH entirely and reducing the presence of sheens to an infrequent occurrence. Figure 3 provides a process flow diagram for the TFR system.

2.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Operations

During the third quarter of 2010, 650 gallons of PSH were recovered by the TFR system, and 2,985,000 gallons of water were recovered and treated at an average rate of 32,446 gallons per day (gpd). This discharge rate is in compliance with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) dewatering permit discharge limit of 57,600 gpd. Copies of the permits are presented in Appendix A. The processed-water-to-recovered-PSH ratio for the third quarter of 2010 was 4,592:1. Figure 4 presents the weekly and cumulative recovered PSH values, as well as upgrade and maintenance activities completed in the third quarter of 2010. Figure 5 presents the weekly and cumulative recovered PSH values since the recovery system became operational. Table 1 presents weekly total system volumes of treated effluent water and recovered PSH.

2.1.1 July 2010

During the month of July 2010, 299 gallons of PSH were recovered, and 883,800 gallons of water were recovered and processed through the treatment system at an average rate of approximately 20 gallons per minute (gpm). All 13 TFR wells operated during July 2010. A total system uptime of approximately 97% was maintained during July 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational enhancements and upgrades made during July 2010:  July 1, 2010 –A new cycle counter was installed on CMW-59R.  July 6, 2010 – CMW-64R was turned off, pending replacement of the regulator.  July 8, 2010 – A new regulator was installed on CMW-64R and operations resumed.  July 13, 2010 – The hose clamp on the total fluids line from the pump in MW-75R was replaced due to corrosion.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 3 - October 29, 2010

On July 19, 2010, a new treated groundwater discharge line was installed within the 50 Bridgewater Street warehouse on the Paragon site. Prior to the installation of this line, the treated groundwater was discharged through a cast iron pipe that transmitted both treated groundwater and sanitary sewer water from the Empire Merchants facility to the sanitary sewer discharge trap. The new line was installed to separate the two water streams and to transmit the brackish treated groundwater through high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. Approximately 450 feet of HDPE pipe was attached to the structural beams along the warehouse ceiling. The HDPE pipe consists of a two-inch inside-diameter pipe which transmits the treated groundwater and an outer four-inch-diameter pipe for secondary containment. A New York City Department of Buildings Permit was obtained prior to initiating the installation of the pipe. The discharge of treated water through the pipe began on August 2, 2010.

2.1.2 August 2010

During the month of August 2010, 252 gallons of PSH were recovered, and 1,000,800 gallons of water were recovered and processed through the treatment system at an average rate of approximately 24 gpm. All TFR wells operated during August 2010, with the exception of MW-74R and MW-75R, which were turned off on August 16, 2010. A total system uptime of 92% was maintained during August 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational enhancements and upgrades made during August 2010:  August 2, 2010 – The installation of the independent HDPE sewer discharge pipe was completed. Treated effluent is transferred through the HDPE pipe to the public sewer trap as of this date.  August 10, 2010 –The QED Long AP-4/TL pump in CMW-59R was replaced with an on-site spare when it was observed that the pump was recovering less water per cycle than usual.  August 16, 2010 – TFR wells MW-74R and MW-75R were shut off with permission from NYSDEC to perform a limited pilot test to determine whether sediment loading on the TFR system can be reduced while maintaining groundwater capture along the bulkhead.  August 16, 2010 – The hose clamp for the air line leading to the TFR pump in CMW-59R was replaced due to corrosion.  August 24, 2010 – The hose clamp on the total fluids line from the pump in MW-73R was replaced due to corrosion.  August 26, 2010 – A chemical feed pilot study of Verox 8 biocide began. The biocide is injected into the pre-oil-water separator (pre-OWS) fractionation tank to inhibit bacterial growth.  August 31, 2010 – The hose clamp on the total fluids line from the pump in PW-2R was replaced due to corrosion.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 4 - October 29, 2010

2.1.3 September 2010

During the month of September 2010, 99 gallons of PSH were recovered, and 1,100,400 gallons of water were recovered and processed through the treatment system at an average rate of approximately 26 gpm. All TFR wells operated during September 2010, with the exception of MW-75R and MW-74R, which were reactivated on September 27 & 28, 2010, respectively. A total system uptime of 99.7% was maintained during September 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational enhancements and upgrades made during September 2010:  September 27, 2010 – MW-75R resumed operations after completion of the pilot test period.  September 28, 2010 – MW-74R resumed operations after completion of the pilot test period.

2.1.4 Groundwater Capture Analysis

In order to evaluate the continued subsurface performance of the TFR system, the interpreted groundwater capture zone behind the bulkhead of the Paragon and Apollo Sites was determined. A series of pressure transducers were deployed during the third quarter of 2010 to collect automated water level data. The following is a summary of the transducer deployment event.  Deployed transducers included In-Situ Level 500 Troll© model water level transducers with 25 foot vented Teflon© coated cables.  Transducers were deployed between September 20, 2010 and September 24, 2010 in Newtown Creek and in wells CMW-21, CMW-23S, CMW-39, CMW-54, CMW-55, CMW-56, CMW-57, CMW-58, MW-66, MW-67, MW-69, MW-72, MW-76, MW-77, and RIMW-01.  The datasets used in the capture zone interpretations were September 21, 2010 at 8:20 for high tide and on September 21, 2010 at 14:35 for low tide.  In order to validate the transducer data, selected wells were manually gauged during the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicted low tide on September 21, 2010. Manual gauging data was consistent with transducer data.

Figures 6 and 7 present the interpreted groundwater contours and capture zones induced by the operation of the TFR system at high and low tide, respectively. The landside subsurface conceptual model of capture and recovery at the bulkhead is supported by the creekside evidence of infrequent or absent sheens. A reversed hydraulic gradient is maintained at both high and low tides.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 5 - October 29, 2010

2.2 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance

A vacuum truck was utilized periodically for TFR equipment maintenance. All vacuum truck services were contracted through Atlantic Response, Inc., of East Brunswick, New Jersey. The vacuum truck was used to complete the following activities:  Removal of recovered PSH from the product holding tank;  Removal of accumulated sludge in the oil-water separator (OWS) and the pre-OWS fractionation tank; and  Removal of accumulated backwash sediment in the backwash tanks.

The primary objective of these cleaning events is to ensure optimal performance of the coalescing media in the OWS, limit sludge buildup in the PSH transfer pumps, and to clean and confirm the functionality of the various float switches in the process equipment.

Removal and cleaning activities were completed on July 14 and 28; August 18 and 23; and September 20, 2010. A total of 14,110 gallons of recovered fluids were transported to FCC Environmental in Wilmington, Delaware, for recycling. The Bill of Lading and receiving reports for the transportation of the recovered fluids are presented in Appendix B.

All TFR pumps are inspected on a monthly basis by removing them from the well to verify the integrity and proper operation. In addition, weekly inspections are performed to confirm that the air pressure regulators and cycle counters associated with each pump (located in the well vault) are operational. Cycle counter readings are collected during these weekly inspections and used to calculate an estimated flow rate per recovery well. A summary of the weekly TFR flow rates per well is presented in Table 3.

Zinc anodes are utilized on each of the TFR pumps to limit the effects of corrosion from the brackish groundwater. The anodes are installed below the pumping water level in each well and are replaced every one to two months, as needed, during the monthly pump inspection.

The organoclay and granular-activated carbon (GAC) filter media were not replaced this quarter. The most recent change-out occurred on June 8, 2010. The next organoclay and GAC changeout is tentatively scheduled to take place November 2010. The final date will be scheduled based on the results of the internal quality assurance discharge sampling for BTEX discussed in Section 2.4.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 6 - October 29, 2010

2.3 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring

Monitoring and recovery wells along the upper and lower bulkheads were gauged several times per month this quarter using an oil-water interface probe for depth to water and PSH thickness. The tidal cycles of Newtown Creek regularly influence the depths to water and PSH thickness in the wells along the bulkhead. PSH thickness observations for all upper bulkhead monitoring wells, lower bulkhead monitoring wells, and recovery wells are provided in Tables 4 and 5 and presented in Figures 8a and 8b. The gauging data sheets for this quarter are presented in Appendix C.

Limited PSH is detected in the monitoring wells on the upper bulkhead, while PSH is detected in monitoring wells on the lower bulkhead. Despite the presence of PSH in the lower bulkhead monitoring wells, the hydraulic and PSH containment and capture induced by recovery wells MW-68R and MW-70R has stopped sheens from entering the creek in the boom compartments fronting this area. Sheens have been absent in C1 since November 2008 (22 months) and in C2 since January 2009 (20 months).

2.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring

In accordance with a May 28, 2010 approval letter from NYCDEP, Texaco was conditionally authorized to discharge 57,600 gpd of treated effluent to the combined sewer. Compliance with the discharge permit requires one sample to be collected quarterly from the final treated discharge and analyzed for the list of contaminants presented in Table 6. The final treated discharge sample port is identified as TS-4. The required quarterly compliance sample was submitted for analysis on July 15, 2010 (see Table 6). Permit compliance has been maintained through the third quarter of 2010.

Additional internal quality assurance (QA) sampling events for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) are used to monitor the influent chemistry (mass loading) and to assist in scheduling organoclay and GAC change-outs. Table 7 presents the analytical data from the internal QA performance monitoring samples collected this quarter. BTEX samples were collected on a weekly basis from the following locations:  TS-1: Untreated Influent;  TS-2: Post-Organoclay Unit;  TS-3: Post-GAC Unit 1 (GAC-1); and  TS-4: Final Treated Discharge (post-GAC-2).

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 7 - October 29, 2010

2.5 Short Term Pilot Test

The current oil-water separator unit has been in service since system start-up on September 14, 2007. The coated steel OWS continues to function properly; however, it is showing signs of corrosion due to the brackish water. The current OWS will be replaced in the fourth quarter of 2010 or the first quarter of 2011 with a corrosion-resistant fiberglass model. The current OWS uses coalescing media to separate the water and oil. As part of the evaluation to specify the new OWS, Benham first wanted to decrease the mass loading of total suspended solids (TSS) and to reduce the extent of microbial growth coming into the existing OWS. Both conditions require additional labor to maintain optimal performance of the existing OWS. With these two conditions minimized, the actual performance of the existing OWS can be evaluated as the new planned OWS will likely be a coalescing media-based OWS, but with a possible different arrangement of the coalescing media plates.

In order to evaluate the performance of the OWS, Benham performed a short-term pilot test in the field from Monday, August 16, through Tuesday, September 28. During this time period, recovery wells MW-74R and MW-75R were shut off. These two wells generally combine for 10% of the total system flow rate and 50% of the TSS mass entering the process equipment. Also during this time period on August 26, the chemical metering of a biocide into the current OWS began. Both activities were geared toward minimizing the TSS loading and microbial growth in the OWS to further optimize the performance of the coalescing plates without the need for additional labor and maintenance activities. This qualitative pilot test was evaluated based on monitoring several parameters, including the total system flow rate, change-out frequency of the six-chamber bag filter, the number of sludge removal events from the OWS, and the presence or absence of a sheen on the creek during this time frame.

The biocide that has been injected into the system is Verox-8, which is an 8% aqueous solution of sodium chlorite and is an EPA-registered biocide that is regarded as environmentally acceptable. The dosage rate has been 165 parts per million (ppm) for a 20-minute period once every 3 hours. Based on this frequency, the daily usage if the biocide is approximately 6.5 pounds per day (lbs/d) or 0.74 gallons per day (gpd). The biocide has been effective in decreasing biological growth in the OWS and the pre-OWS fractionation tank, and as a result the thin layer of microbial growth is no longer present on the surface of either tank. The frequency of removing sludge from the OWS also declined throughout the six-week period. Two sludge removal events occurred during the last two weeks of August using a vacuum truck. However, only one event was required in September.

MW-74R and MW-75R combined account for approximately 10% of the total system flow rate (see Table 3) and the total system flow fluctuated from 23 to 25 gpm throughout the 6-week period. Although a reduction in total system flow was not observed by taking these two wells off-line, it is highly probable that TSS loading into the system did decline due to the decreased sludge removal in the OWS and the lower pressures observed when changing out the six-

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 8 - October 29, 2010

chamber bag filter. During the month of September, even though the six-chamber bag filter was changed out on a daily basis for preventive maintenance, the pressure in the bag filter housing was approximately 6 to 7 psi prior to each change-out event. In August, prior to those two wells being taken off-line, the pressures were generally 19 to 20 psi on a daily basis before being changed out. This assessment further supports that there was decreased TSS loading into the system and also reduced biological growth, which was also prone to plugging the six-chamber filter as well as the OWS.

In summary, qualitatively based on routine maintenance activities across the six-week period, the OWS and the associated six-chamber bag filter did require less maintenance. The new OWS will also contain similar coalescing media and a similar arrangement, based on the results of this short six-week pilot test and also the previous operational history of the OWS.

Throughout the six-week period, one sheen was detected in compartment 4 (C4) and one sheen was detected on compartment SE1 (SE1). The occurrence of these sheens on just two days is generally consistent with the absence of sheens prior to the shutoff of these two wells. The primary absence of sheens is also consistent with the hydraulic and PSH capture analysis maps that were prepared while MW-74R and MW-75R were off-line. The maps are presented as Figures 6 and 7.

2.6 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance

An inspection of all indoor monitoring wells is completed monthly. The purpose of each inspection is to ensure the structural integrity of the steel lid and the compression cap to prevent the possibility of vapor intrusion. Components that are examined include the steel well flush- mount lids, gaskets, and compression plugs. Individual components are replaced as deemed necessary to maintain the integrity of the surface seals. After the inspection has been completed, the flush-mount vault lids are caulked to create an airtight seal with the floor, thus further reducing the potential for vapor intrusion from the subsurface.

On July 20, 2010, during the annual two-week warehouse shut down, warehouse slab maintenance activities were completed on the floor of the 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street warehouses, as well as the 100-120 Apollo Street warehouse. A total of 32 cracks, totaling 57 linear feet, were sealed in the 42 Bridgewater Street warehouse using 3M DP-600 concrete epoxy. These activities were completed to further reduce the potential for vapor intrusion.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 9 - October 29, 2010

2.7 Sub-Slab Depressurization System

The sub-slab depressurization (SSD) system was restarted on August 29, 2010, following the replacement of the spent vapor-phase GAC on August 24, 2010. The spent vapor-phase carbon was transported off-site on August 24, 2010 by Siemens Water Technologies, Corp. for reactivation at their facility in Darlington, PA. The Bill of Lading is presented in Appendix D.

Currently, the system is operated only while personnel are on-site (10 hours, four days per week). Monitoring occurred twice per week from startup, with the collection of active vacuum and induced vacuum at all of the extraction points (E-1 through E-7) and laterals (H-1 through H-3), at the header manifold, and before and after the moisture knock-out tank and both vapor- phase GAC units. In addition, air velocity readings and methane and PID concentrations are collected at the active laterals H-1 and H-3, at the header manifold, and before and after the moisture knock-out tank and both vapor-phase GAC units. Figure 9 shows the locations of each of the extraction points and laterals. Figure 10 shows a process flow schematic for the SSD system.

During the SSD system restart, the system was balanced to maximize the use of the vapor-phase GAC while achieving the designed induced vacuum in the subsurface. The system was designed to achieve a minimum of 0.01 inches of water column (in. WC) in the subsurface while to effectively capture petroleum vapors. The system is currently operating at an induced vacuum of 0.1 in. WC, which is above the subsurface design vacuum of 0.01 in. WC, and, on average, 10 cubic feet per minute (cfm) of total air flow.

Vapors are extracted through the laterals H-1 and H-3. The lateral H-2 remains closed and operates as an induced vacuum monitoring point. The vertical extraction points are not active, but act as monitoring points for induced vacuum in the subsurface. Table 8 summarizes the field monitoring parameters collected during the third quarter. Methane is extracted from the subsurface and is diluted with ambient intake air, resulting in an atmospheric discharge of less than 1% methane. The discharge limit is 20% of the lower explosive limit (LEL), which equates to a limit of 1% methane by volume.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 10 - October 29, 2010

3.0 NEWTOWN CREEK CONTAINMENT SYSTEM

The details concerning the performance, maintenance, and monitoring of the Newtown Creek boom containment systems are presented in this section. The Newtown Creek boom containment systems are currently installed along 360 linear feet of Newtown Creek fronting the Paragon site and 67 feet along the Apollo Street site. This boom system was installed and is currently maintained by Texaco. The 427 linear feet of globe boom (primary containment) is divided into 5 watertight compartments, with compartments 1 to 4 (C1-C4) fronting the Paragon site and compartment 5 (C5) fronting the Apollo Street site. A fence boom extends the entire 427 feet along both properties (secondary containment).

Additionally, a three-compartment containment boom (SE1, SE2, and SE3), installed by ExxonMobil and maintained by Texaco, extends from the western terminus of the secondary containment fence boom to the west end of Apollo Street, with SE1 adjacent to C5 and SE3 adjacent to Apollo Street. Figure 11 presents a plan view of the boom system.

During the third quarter, a total of 8 sheens were observed on Newtown Creek outside of the secondary containment fence boom. Two sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed in both July and August 2010, and four sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed in September 2010. The source of these sheens was unknown and they were independent of the Paragon and Apollo Street sites.

3.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal

Compartments C1 to C4 are inspected and photographed twice daily at least four times per week. Figure 12 presents photographs of the typical conditions in each boom compartment during the quarter. A summary of these inspections reveals that:  Sheens were absent in C1 and C2 this quarter;  Sheens were absent in C3 during July and September 2010 and only one sheen was observed during August 2010; and  Sheens were absent in C4 during August 2010 and only one sheen was observed during both July and September 2010.

Table 9 provides a summary of details of the boom containment system fronting the Paragon site. Completed boom inspection forms for this quarter are included as Appendix E.

The water quality within compartments C1 to C4 has greatly improved since the completion of the full-scale grout wall in the fourth quarter of 2006, the start-up of the TFR system in September 2007, and the sealing of the bulkhead seams of the Paragon site in September 2008.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 11 - October 29, 2010

A sheen has not been observed in C1 since November 2008 (22 months) nor in C2 since January 2009 (20 months).

3.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property

Compartment C5 is inspected and photographed twice daily at least four times a week, and compartments SE1, SE2, and SE3 are inspected when visible from land and photographed during monthly creekside bulkhead inspections. The location of the three-compartment boom system prevents taking daily photographs from land due to the sloped earthen embankment above the Apollo Street site concrete gravity wall. Photographs of C5 depicting typical conditions within this compartment are presented in Figure 13. Figure 14 presents photographs of the conditions in SE1, SE2, and SE3 during the monthly creekside boat inspections. A summary of the inspections reveals that:  Sheens were absent in C5 this quarter;  Sheens were absent in SE1 in July and August 2010, and only one sheen was observed in September 2010; and  Sheens were absent in SE2 and SE3 this quarter.

Table 10 provides a summary of details of the boom containment system fronting the Apollo Street site. Completed boom inspection forms for the quarter are included in Appendix E.

Prior to operation of recovery well CMW-43R on February 12, 2008, the absorbent booms in C5 became heavily stained in as little as several days after a boom change-out, and PSH sheens were observed frequently during that time. The seepage of PSH has stopped in C5, and during the current quarter, no sheens were observed. The number of sheen observations in C5, SE1, and SE2 has decreased significantly following the activation of the pump in wells CMW-43R and CMW-17R, in 2008 and 2009 respectively, and the completion of the Apollo Street site bulkhead barrier improvements in 2008. C5 monitoring will continue to serve as an aid in evaluating the recovery system’s performance and the integrity of the Apollo site bulkhead barrier. No sheens have been observed in SE3 since Benham began making observations in January 2009.

3.3 Monthly Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing

Once per month, a creekside inspection of the containment boom systems along both sites is completed using a boat. This includes the floating boom systems in Newtown Creek along both sites, the steel bulkhead and epoxy-sealed seams on the Paragon site, and the concrete gravity wall and barrier membrane on the Apollo Street site. The purpose is to confirm the integrity of the containment systems, ensure they are performing as designed, and maintain or repair them as needed.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 12 - October 29, 2010

The containment boom systems are inspected for possible rips, tears, and other deficiencies in the HDPE liner. In addition, the booms are checked to ensure they are free to travel with the tides on their vertical anchoring points and that they are in good general condition. During this quarter, there were no deficiencies observed in the booms with respect to containment and collection. Seam-by-seam visual inspections of the Paragon site steel bulkhead and the Apollo site membrane barrier were conducted concurrently with the boom maintenance activities on July 15, August 31, and September 9, 2010. The portions of the steel bulkhead and barrier membrane above mean sea level were inspected by boat. During the July 15, August 31, and September 9, 2010 inspections, seams in need of maintenance were addressed by reapplying epoxy to portions of individual seams. Of the 180 bulkhead seams that were previously sealed in 2008, only parts of 18 required application of additional epoxy this quarter.

During the annual below water inspection between August 23 and August 26, 2010, divers were employed to inspect the bulkhead below the surface of Newtown Creek along the Paragon and Apollo Street sites. As a precaution, portions of 42 seams below the waterline along the steel bulkhead were maintained using marine epoxy during this inspection. In addition, 4 locations on the barrier membrane in C5 were repaired using marine epoxy.

Creekside photographs of the containment boom sections along the Paragon site (C1 through C4) and along the Apollo site (C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3) were taken during the July 15, August 31, and September 9, 2010 creekside inspections.

3.4 Containment and Absorption System Enhancements

Enhancements were not needed for the Paragon site and Apollo Street site containment boom systems. Currently, solidifier booms occupy all compartments in the containment boom systems on both sites. Solidifier booms are more efficient at absorbing and retaining small quantities of sheen and, therefore, did not need to be changed this quarter. No shipments of spent solidifier booms were transported off-site this quarter.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 13 - October 29, 2010

4.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIES

Site characterization activities consisted of on-site and regional well gauging, site-wide groundwater sampling, and ambient air monitoring in the third quarter of 2010.

4.1 Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging

A regional monitoring well gauging event coordinated between BP, ExxonMobil, and Texaco was conducted on August 24, 2010. Regional monitoring well gauging events are scheduled to coincide with a high or low tide. The third quarter event coincided with a high tide. Wells that have been identified as being influenced by the tide from Newtown Creek are gauged between one hour before and one hour after the designated National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicted high tide. The wells that are not influenced by the tide from Newtown Creek are gauged the same day, as close to the NOAA predicted high tide as feasible.

The gauging data from the August 24, 2010 event were used to construct a regional groundwater contour map, which is presented as Plate 1. Groundwater elevations observed in the ExxonMobil Off-Site area are slightly lower than typically observed; however, the general hydraulic gradients and interpreted groundwater flow direction remains, in general, away from Newtown Creek, toward the TFR system and the ExxonMobil Off-Site Recovery System.

A PSH thickness and extent map is presented as Plate 2. The lateral extent of the PSH is generally consistent with previously observed data.

4.2 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event

Groundwater was sampled from a total of 40 monitoring wells on the Paragon and Apollo Street sites between July 20 and July 29, 2010. Samples were collected using low-flow collection protocols (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Standard Operating Procedure for Low-Stress [Low Flow] / Minimal Drawdown Ground-Water Sample Collection, June 16, 2010) and only from monitoring wells that did not contain PSH. All samples were analyzed for the NYSDEC Spill Technology and Remediation Series (STARS) gasoline and fuel oil contaminants. In addition, 7 of the samples were analyzed for the expanded Target Contaminant List for both gasoline and fuel oil, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dissolved RCRA metals, and total dissolved solids. The samples were analyzed by TestAmerica (TA) Laboratories using Methods 8260B, 8270C, 8082, 6010B, 7470A, and 2540C.

The Benham Companies, LLC Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 14 - October 29, 2010

4.3 Ambient Air Monitoring

An ambient air quality monitoring event occurred at the Empire Merchants warehouse and office spaces at the Paragon and Apollo Sites on August 21 and 22, 2010. The event was conducted by Benham, on behalf of Texaco. Summa canisters were deployed early on the morning of August 21, 2010 and were collected precisely 24 hours later on August 22, 2010. A total of 20 summa canisters were deployed across the site with 14 located inside and 6 located outside. Breathing zone air quality was also monitored using a PID during summa canister deployment. The samples were analyzed by TA Laboratories using Methods 3C and TO-15. The results from the August 21 and 22, 2010 ambient air quality monitoring event are presented in Table 11. Compound concentrations are consistent with previous results collected from the site and indicate a safe working environment for the employees. Figure 15 presents the locations of the ambient air sampling locations.

The Benham Companies, LLC

Figures

The Benham Companies, LLC Site Location

NOTE: BASE MAP OF THE USGS BROOKLYN 7.5 MIN QUADRANGLE.

0 1,000 2,000 4,000

Feet FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209 GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY Site Location Map drawn checked approved AGM JAK PJC figure no. date 1/15/08 date 2/11/08date 2/11/08 job no. file no. 1 01-1633-00-5443-020 Site_Location_20100713.mxd ³ initials date revision S £ 2 Figure No. Figure " ´ MW-68R PJC 7/29/2010 " ´ TS_20100713.mxd CMW-58 " ´ MW-69 approved no. file date " ´ " ´ MW-70R JAK 7/29/2010 Recovery Well Well Monitoring MW-62 CMW-53R revision " ´ Feet

Recovery System Recovery

checked date

U GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY

N Location of Total Fluids " " ´ ´

TEXACO FACILITY #304209 TEXACO 50 E date

CMW-59R

CMW-15 V

" ´ 46010AT106

R AGM " ´

TRANSFER PUMP CONTAINMENT BOX CONTAINMENT PUMP TRANSFER 1/19/2010

E TERMINAL OIL PARAGON FORMER Legend

BACKWASH TANK K initials Treatment System Layout System Treatment

PSH TANK E

0100200 E no.job drawn " ´ date M CMW-63R MW-63 CONCRETE PAD " ´ MW-72 " ´ PRE OIL WATER SEPARATOR TANK SEPARATOR WATER OIL PRE CMW-1 " ´ UNTREATED WATER TANK WATER UNTREATED MW-75R MW-60 PW-2R " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ OIL WATER SEPARATOR BUILDING SEPARATOR WATER OIL COMPRESSOR SHED CMW-2 " ´ CMW-23 S/D CMW-23 CMW-55 " ´ CMW-14 " ´ CMW-56 " ´ CMW-54 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ PW-1R MW-73R MW-64 " ´ MW-74R MW-61 " ´ " ´ BUILDING CMW-64R " ´ CMW-29 S/D CMW-29 WATER TREATMENT TREATMENT WATER CMW-13 Feet " ´ " ´ CMW-39 15 " CMW-43R ´ CMW-17R CMW-27 03060 " ´ " ´ MW-2 " ´ CMW-25 S/D CMW-25 " ´ CMW-28 " ´ " ´ CMW-4 " ´ CMW-26 CMW-5 "

E E

MW-67

´ N

CMW-57 W MW-66 CMW-33 "

O T " ´ "

W E " ´ "

´ N CMW-32 MW-69 CMW-6 " ´ CMW-30 " ´ MW-68R " ´ " ´ MW-70R " ´ CMW-58 " ´ CMW-8 " ´ MW-76 CMW-53R " ´ " ´ CMW-9 CMW-47 S/D CMW-47 CMW-59R CMW-31 " ´ " ´ " ´ CMW-63R " ´ MW-77 " ´ CMW-60 S/D CMW-60 " ´ CMW-10 MW-72 PW-2R " ´ " ´ CMW-46 MW-75R " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " CMW-61 ´ " ´ STREET CMW-55 VARICK CMW-23 S/D CMW-23 MW-78 CMW-34 S/D CMW-34 " ´ " ´ CMW-54 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " MW-73R ´ CMW-24 S/D CMW-24 MW-59 " ´

PW-1R T

CMW-56 E MW-74R " ´

CMW-43R E R " ´ T S

CMW-64R " ´

CMW-17R R CMW-12

CMW-62 S/D CMW-62 E " ´ CMW-39

MW-58 T " ´ A " ´ " ´ W " ´ " ´ E

" G ´ D " ´ I CMW-42 " ´ R RIMW-01 CMW-38 B CMW-35 CMW-21 CMW-36 S/D CMW-36 " ´ CMW-37 " ´ CMW-16 CMW-45 RW-25 " ´ " ´ RIMW-02 " ´ T CMW-18 E CMW-22 TRE N DAM S " ´ A " ´ V CMW-41 S/D CMW-41 " ´ CMW-20 " ´ MW-26 " MW-88D ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ MW-56 MW-1 " ´ " ´ MW-88S

CMW-19 S/D CMW-19

" ´

E CMW-44

T " ´

CMW-40 O

P MW-32 A " ´ MW-57 " ´ Site View Site Regional View

EET System\TS_20100713.mxd NY\2010\Projects\Treatment Greenpoint, LLO STR FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

TOTAL FLUIDS RECOVERY SYSTEM PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

3 Figure 4 Recovered PSH & Maintenance Timeline July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York

50,000 250

45,000

40,000 200 Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)

Weekly Recovered PSH (gal)

35,000 Equipment Cleaning Event Upgrade Event

Carbon/Clay Change-Out 30,000 150 (gallons) ed (gallons) rr dd

25,000

20,000 100 CMW-59R pump replaced 7/14/2010 Verox 8 biocide chemical feed started 8/10/2010 15,000 Weekly PSH Recovere PSH Weekly

CumulativePSH Recove 8/24/2010 SSD Carbon 8/18/2010 Change-out 10,000 7/28/2010 50 MW-74R & MW-75R operating MW-74R & MW-75R 8/23/2010 9/28/2010 5,000 offline for pilot study 8/16/2010 9/20/2010

0 0 7/1/2010 7/13/2010 7/25/2010 8/6/2010 8/18/2010 8/30/2010 9/11/2010 9/23/2010 Date Figure 5 Cumulative & Weekly PSH Recovered October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York

45,000 1,500 41,972 gallons of PSH Recovered To Date 650 gallons of PSH Recovered in the Third Quarter of 2010 40,000

35,000 Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)

Weekly Recovered PSH (gal) 30,000 1,000 (gallons) ed (gallons) d d r r 25,000

20,000 H Recovere PSH Recove SS

15,000 500 Weekly P Weekly Cumulative Cumulative 10, 000

5,000

0 0 10/05/07 02/02/08 06/01/08 09/29/08 01/27/09 05/27/09 09/24/09 01/22/10 05/22/10 09/19/10

Note: Cumulative PSH Recovery includes 11,697 gallons recovered during interim recovery activities that Date occurred between July 2005 and September 2007. Weekly PSH values were calculated on a Sunday to Saturday week. FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209 INTERPRETED CAPTURE ZONE PUMPING AT HIGH TIDE SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 AT 08:20

6 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

INTERPRETED CAPTURE ZONE PUMPING AT LOW TIDE SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 AT 14:35

7 Figure 8a Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells Phase Separated Hydrocarbon Thickness vs. Time July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

3.5

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

0.5

0 7/1/2010 7/16/2010 7/31/2010 8/15/2010 8/30/2010 9/14/2010 9/29/2010 Date

CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-67 MW-69 MW-66 Figure 8b Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells Phase Separated Hydrocarbon Thickness vs. Time July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 4

3.5

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

0.5

0 7/1/2010 7/16/2010 7/31/2010 8/15/2010 8/30/2010 9/14/2010 9/29/2010 Date

CMW-23S CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 MW-72

FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

SUB SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

an SAIC company 10 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

PLAN VIEW OF BOOM CONTAINMENT AND ABSORPTION SYSTEM

KEY PLAN 11 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010

7-1-2010 7-28-2010 8-5-2010 8-19-2010 9-1-2010 9-22-2010

PARAGON SITE Boom Containment Figure The series of photographs for each boom containment system compartment show the water quality conditions through the Compartments 1 to 4 third quarter of 2010. These compartments are inspected and photographed twice daily, at least four times per week. Paragon Site 12 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

July 2010 August 2010 September 2010

7-1-2010 8-5-2010 9-1-2010 C5

7-28-2010 8-19-2010 9-22-2010

APOLLO SITE Boom Containment This photo compilation depicts boom compartment C5 fronting the Apollo Street site timber crib bulkhead in Newtown Figure Compartment 5 Creek. The series of photographs this compartment show the water quality conditions through the third quarter of 2010. Apollo Street Site This compartments is inspected and photographed twice daily, at least four times per week. Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 13

July 2010 August 2010 September 2010

SE1

7-15-2010 8-31-2010 9-9-2010

SE2

7-15-2010 8-31-2010 9-9-2010

SE3

7-15-2010 8-31-2010 9-9-2010

APOLLO STREET SITE Boom Containment This photo compilation depicts boom compartments SE1 to SE3 fronting the Apollo Street site relieving platform bulk- Compartments SE1 to SE3 Figure head along Newtown Creek. This compilation depicts typical water quality conditions within SE1 to SE3. Apollo Street Site Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 14

FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING LOCATIONS AUGUST 21-22, 2010

Tables

The Benham Companies, LLC Table 1 Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis September 14, 2007 through September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Cumulative Water Cumulative PSH Recovery Cumulative PSH Recovery Date Treated (gal) since 9/14/2007 (gal) since June 2005 (gal) Total Interim Recovery From June 2005 NA NA 11,697 to July 2007 9/14/2007 to 6/30/2010 18,624,575 29,625 41,322 7/3/2010 18,668,075 29,649 41,346 7/10/2010 18,829,908 29,715 41,412 7/17/2010 19,077,375 29,815 41,512 7/24/2010 19,303,342 29,868 41,565 7/31/2010 19,508,375 29,924 41,621 8/7/2010 19,730,975 30,029 41,726 8/14/2010 19,973,975 30,069 41,766 8/21/2010 20,183,275 30,111 41,808 8/28/2010 20,404,825 30,154 41,851 9/4/2010 20,642,325 30,191 41,888 9/11/2010 20,892,675 30,211 41,908 9/18/2010 21,161,825 30,236 41,933 9/25/2010 21,414,725 30,257 41,954 9/30/2010 21,609,575 30,275 41,972 Total Recovery in 2,985,000 650 NA 3rd Quarter of 2010 Total Recovery with Current System 21,609,575 30,275 NA 9/14/2007 to 9/30/2010

Total PSH Recovery From June 2005 to September 30, 2010 41,972

Notes: NA = Not Applicable Table 2 Total Fluids Recovery System Operation July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Percent Uptime* Well ID Well Notes July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 CMW-17R (Phase 2) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% Replaced cycle counter, hose clamp, and pump, did not affect uptime CMW-43R (Phase 2) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% CMW-53R (Phase 2) 96.6% 92.0% 99.4% CMW-59R (Phase 2) 96.6% 91.2% 99.6% CMW-63R (Phase 2) 96.6% 92.0% 99.2% CMW-64R (Phase 2) 88.0% 92.0% 99.4% Replaced regulator MW-68R (Phase 1) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% MW-70R (Phase 1) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% MW-73R (Phase 1) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% Replaced hose clamp, did not affect uptime MW-74R (Phase 1) 96.6% 49.2% 11.1% Planned downtime from pilot study MW-75R (Phase 1) 95.6% 49.2% 15.0% Planned downtime from pilot study PW-1R (Phase 1) 96.6% 92.0% 99.7% PW-2R (Phase 2) 96.6% 92.0% 99.6% Replaced hose clamp, did not affect uptime Total Monthly 96.6% 92.1% 99.7% System Uptime**

* "Percent Uptime" is a measurement of the amount of time a recovery pump operated in the given period. On occasion, individual pumps may be shut down for maintenance or repairs. 100% uptime is determined as continuous operation for 24 hours per day for the entire month.

** "Total Monthly System Uptime" is the runtime of the recovery system during the given period. This runtime does not require every pump to be operating. 100% uptime is determined as continuous operation for 24 hours per day for the entire month. Table 3 Summary of Individual Well Flow-Rates July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Sum of CMW-17R CMW-43R CMW-53R CMW-59R CMW-63R CMW-64R MW-68R MW-70R MW-73R MW-74R MW-75R PW-1R PW-2R Individual Time Frame Wells June 21, 2010 to 3.75 3.78 4.33 0.07 a 4.91 1.79 1.28 1.88 1.12 0.85 1.72 0.88 0.88 27.24 July 1, 2010 July 1, 2010 to 3.37 3.53 4.14 0.98 4.32 0.70 b 1.41 2.04 1.10 0.75 1.68 0.78 1.11 25.91 July 8, 2010 July 8, 2010 to 3.07 3.52 4.22 0.63 4.34 0.45 b 1.23 2.12 1.45 0.70 1.83 0.97 1.12 25.66 July 13, 2010 July 13, 2010 to 3.40 3.72 4.79 1.77 4.92 1.75 1.50 2.49 1.68 0.75 1.59 1.31 1.40 31.07 July 19, 2010 July 19, 2010 to 2.23 2.51 3.33 1.20 3.44 1.20 0.95 1.45 0.85 0.52 1.06 0.76 2.49 22.01 July 28, 2010 July 28, 2010 to 2.42 2.65 3.53 1.29 3.77 1.32 0.97 1.52 0.97 0.56 1.16 0.95 2.72 23.84 August 3, 2010 August 3, 2010 to 2.56 3.07 3.01 1.43 4.10 1.44 1.04 1.70 1.39 0.61 1.22 1.06 3.00 25.62 August 10 2010 August 10, 2010 to 2.61 3.25 3.66 2.37 3.85 1.43 1.13 1.97 1.41 0.41 0.84 1.20 3.13 27.27 August 19, 2010 August 19, 2010 to 2.70 2.80 3.24 3.22 3.41 0.84 1.46 1.59 2.60 0.00 d 0.00 d 1.22 3.30 26.37 August 24, 2010 August 24, 2010 to 2.74 3.28 3.37 3.55 3.70 1.46 1.21 1.98 1.63 0.00 d 0.00 d 1.33 3.79 28.05 August 30, 2010 August 30, 2010 to 3.18 4.27 3.21 3.91 3.64 1.81 0.11 0.55 1.71 0.00 d 0.00 d 1.56 2.45 26.40 September 8, 2010 September 8, 2010 to 3.38 4.40 3.53 4.07 4.69 1.84 1.25 2.39 1.03 0.00 d 0.00 d 1.58 2.05 30.21 September 14, 2010 September 14, 2010 to 3.79 4.60 3.30 4.32 4.93 1.96 1.18 1.96 0.89 0.00 d 0.00 d 1.64 1.97 30.54 September 21, 2010 September 21, 2010 to 3.43 4.40 3.68 4.09 4.72 1.82 1.47 0.47 c 0.79 0.23 d 0.06 d 1.57 1.67 28.40 September 29, 2010 Notes: a - The cycle counter on CMW-59R was replaced on July 1, when it was determined that it was incorrectly recording cycles. b - CMW-64R had reduced operating time due to routine maintenance. c - MW-70R was found to not be properly pumping on September 29, 2010. Maintenance was performed, and MW-70R was returned to operations. d - MW-74R and MW-75R were shut down for a six week pilot test period to determine whether the continued operation of these pumping wells was required to maintain the zone of capture along the upper bulkhead. Operations were suspended between August 16 and September 27, 2010 for MW-75R, and between August 16 and September 28, 2010 for MW-74R. Table 4 Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring Wells July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Monitoring Wells Date CMW-23D CMW-23S CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-66 MW-67 MW-69 MW-72 MW-76 MW-77 7/1/2010 ND ND 0.16 ND ND 1.18 1.12 ND 0.85 1.28 ND ND 0.85 7/8/2010 ND ND 0.08 ND ND 1.09 0.98 ND 1.12 1.04 ND ND 0.76 7/13/2010 ND ND 0.51 ND ND 1.23 1.41 ND 1.11 1.39 ND ND 0.76 7/19/2010* ND ND 0.76 ND ND 1.44 1.06 ND 1.35 1.23 ND ND 0.93 7/28/2010 ND ND 0.06 ND ND 1.04 1.02 ND 1.23 0.96 ND ND 1.19 8/3/2010 ND ND 0.57 ND ND 1.45 0.97 ND 1.50 2.03 ND ND NM 8/10/2010 ND ND 0.62 ND ND 1.31 1.16 ND 1.12 1.50 ND ND 1.62 8/19/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.38 1.13 ND 1.43 2.08 ND ND 1.53 8/24/2010* ND ND ND ND ND 0.74 0.45 ND 0.59 0.30 ND ND ND 8/30/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.18 1.62 ND 1.30 1.42 ND ND 1.41 9/8/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.97 3.40 ND 0.47 0.61 ND ND 1.09 9/14/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.13 1.70 ND 1.15 2.12 ND ND 1.45 9/21/2010 ND ND 0.04 ND ND 1.12 1.33 ND 0.99 0.76 ND ND 1.29 9/29/2010 ND ND 0.18 ND ND 0.94 0.43 ND 0.49 0.47 ND ND 1.35

Notes: 1) Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement. 2) ND Indicates PSH was not detected at time of measurement. 3) NM Indicates a well was not measured. * Values from Combined Gauging Events. Table 5 Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Recovery Wells July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Phase I Recovery Wells Phase II Recovery Wells Date MW-68R MW-70R MW-73R MW-74R MW-75R PW-1R CMW-17R CMW-43R CMW-53R CMW-59R CMW-63R CMW-64R PW-2R 7/1/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 0.51 ND 7/8/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.99 ND 7/13/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 7/19/2010* ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.88 ND 7/28/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.64 ND 8/3/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.47 ND 8/10/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.68 ND 8/19/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.60 0.04 8/24/2010* ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 ND 8/30/2010 ND ND ND ND 0.06 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.43 ND 9/8/2010 0.01 ND ND ND 0.11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.69 ND 9/14/2010 ND ND ND ND 0.20 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 ND 9/21/2010 ND ND ND ND 0.18 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.61 ND 9/29/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.76 ND

Notes: 1) Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement. 2) ND Indicates PSH was not detected at time of measurement. 3) NM Indicates a well was not measured. * Values from Combined Gauging Events. Table 6 NYCDEP Permit Compliance Dicharge Sampling Results July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYCDEP TS-4 Post GAC 2: Analyte Daily Monthly Treated Effluent Limit Limit (7/15/2010) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L) <5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (ug/L) <9.6 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L) <5 Aroclor 1016 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1221 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1232 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1242 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1248 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1254 (ug/L) <0.058 Aroclor 1260 (ug/L) <0.058 Benzene (ug/L) 134 57 <5 Cadmium - Total (mg/L) 2 <0.001 Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/L) <5 Carbonaceous Biochemical 14 Oxygen Demand (mg/L) Chloride (mg/L) 11800 Chloroform (ug/L) <5 Copper - Total (mg/L) 5 0.0021J Ethylbenzene (ug/L) 380 142 <5 Flashpoint (°F) >140 >176 Hexavalent Chromium - 5 <0.01 Total (mg/L) Lead - Total (mg/L) 2 <0.006 Mercury - Total (mg/L) 0.05 <0.0002 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (ug/L) 50 <5 Naphthalene (ug/L) 47 19 <4.8 Nickel - Total (mg/L) 3 <0.01 Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/L-N) <0.05 pH, Field (S.U.) 5-12 6.81 Phenol (ug/L) <4.8 SGT Total Petroleum 50 2.9J Hydrocarbons (mg/L) Temperature, Field (°C) <150 21.6 Tetrachloroethene (ug/L) 20 <5 Toluene (ug/L) 74 28 <5 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L-N) 1.69 Total Residue, at 103°C (mg/L) 23000 Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 350 <4 Total Xylenes (ug/L) 74 28 <10 Zinc - Total (mg/L) 5 0.0076J

* J indicates an estimated value. This data qualifier is used either when estimating a concentration for tentatively identified compounds where a 1:1 response is assumed, or when the data indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit but greater than zero. (TestAmerica)

Indicates the values that must comply with NYCDEP standards. Table 7 Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Sampling Results July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Time Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/1/2010 11:25 70 71 <1 7.3 130 TS-2 Post OC 7/1/2010 11:30 61 44 <5 5.4 71 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/1/2010 11:35 7.4 1.8 <1 <1 2.4 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/1/2010 11:40 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/7/2010 8:15 70 56 <1 6.6 110 TS-2 Post OC 7/7/2010 8:20 70 44 1.6 5.7 85 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/7/2010 8:25 6.7 0.83J <1 <1 1J TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/7/2010 8:30 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/15/2010 12:50 99 85 <4 9.5 140 TS-2 Post OC 7/15/2010 12:55 100 69 <5 8.1 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/15/2010 13:00 15 3.8 1J <2 4.9 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/15/2010 13:05 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/22/2010 8:00 110 110 <10 13 200 TS-2 Post OC 7/22/2010 8:05 100 89 <10 10 160 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/22/2010 8:10 31 13 <1 1.7 21 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/22/2010 8:15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/29/2010 10:45 130 140 <10 15 270 TS-2 Post OC 7/29/2010 10:50 120 120 <10 14 220 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/29/2010 10:55 41 16 1.4 2 27 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/29/2010 11:00 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/5/2010 10:40 140 220 <10 20 420 TS-2 Post OC 8/5/2010 10:45 130 250 <10 18 470 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/5/2010 10:50 70 38 <5 4.4J 68 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/5/2010 10:55 0.59J <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/11/2010 8:55 120 180 <10 19 390 TS-2 Post OC 8/11/2010 8:50 120 120 <10 15 260 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/11/2010 8:45 67 34 <2 5.1 66 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/11/2010 8:40 4.6 <1 0.72J <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/19/2010 8:45 65 95 <10 7.7J 190 TS-2 Post OC 8/19/2010 8:40 75 89 <10 8.4J 170 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/19/2010 8:35 62 21 1.4J 3.1 34 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/19/2010 8:30 16 1.3 1.2 <1 1.4J TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/25/2010 9:00 69 55 <10 6.2J 110 TS-2 Post OC 8/25/2010 9:05 72 51 <10 6.5J 99 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/25/2010 9:10 56 16 <2 3.1 26 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/25/2010 9:15 20 1.7 1.2 <1 1.8J TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/31/2010 1:55 21 24 0.63J 1.7 45 TS-2 Post OC 8/31/2010 1:50 28 26 0.7J 2.4 46 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/31/2010 1:45 40 14 0.99J 2.2 21 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/31/2010 1:40 11 0.79J 0.95J <1 <2

Note: Compliance with NYCDEP discharge criteria is specific to the treated effluent only (TS-4). Table 7 Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Sampling Results July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Time Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/16/2010 2:00 30 39 1.1J 2.7J 77 TS-2 Post OC 9/16/2010 2:15 27 22 <1 2.1 44 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/16/2010 2:20 33 18 <1 2.2 31 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/16/2010 2:25 20 4.1J 1.1J <5 5.9J TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/21/2010 8:45 42 62 <1 5.3 150 TS-2 Post OC 9/21/2010 8:40 43 55 <1 5.3 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/21/2010 8:35 39 24 <1 3.2 43 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/21/2010 8:30 21 4.7 0.89J 0.86J 6.9 TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/29/2010 10:15 70 89 0.92J 8.3 210 TS-2 Post OC 9/29/2010 10:20 68 79 1 7.8 180 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/29/2010 10:25 56 32 0.86J 4.3 60 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/29/2010 10:30 29 5.2 0.94J 1.2 7.9 New York City Effleunt Standards, applicable to TS-4 only 134 380 50 74 74

Note: Compliance with NYCDEP discharge criteria is specific to the treated effluent only (TS-4). Table 8 Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System Monitoring Results Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Type of Location Units 8/29/10 8/30/10 9/1/10 9/8/10 9/9/10 9/13/10 9/16/10 9/20/10 9/29/10 9/30/10 Reading

H-1 "WC 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Active Vacuum H-3 "WC 5 5 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5

Manifold Flow Rate CFM 16.7 37 34 19 6.1 9.7 9.5 16 4.2 7.7

E-1 "WC 0.17 NA NA 0.14 0.135 0.13 0.105 0.01 0.12 0.13

E-2 "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.235 0.08 NA NA

E-3 "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.115 0.03 0.115 0.13

E-4 Induced "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.055 0.09 Subsurface E-5 Vacuum "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.2 0.19 0.185 0.185 0.115 0.17 0.2

E-6 "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0 0.25-1.0

E-7 "WC 0.25-1.0 NA NA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.085 0.045 0.075 0.11

H-2 "WC 0.095 NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.04 0.06 0.075

Post GAC 2 Methane % 0.3 NA 0.3 0.1 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 NA NA

PID Post GAC 2 ppm 0 0 0 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 Reading

Note NA - Not Applicable Table 9 Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities, Paragon Site July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 Component Name Type Location Date Installed Activity - Date of Activity - Date of Activity - Date of Condition Condition Condition Activity Activity Activity

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 1 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (20 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 2 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (20 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was observed once Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 3 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (20 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was observed once Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was observed once Compartment 4 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (20 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Hard Boom Globe Boom (Primary Parallel to Bulkhead July 2005 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (C1-C4) Containment) Hard Boom Fence Boom (Secondary Outermost Component May 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Containment)

Notes: 1 - Solidifier booms replaced the absorbent booms in C1, C2, C3, and C4 on March 2, 2010 and do not need to be changed out monthly in order to continue functioning. 2 - Sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 8 sheens were observed during the third quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows: • July 2010 - 2 (7/13/2010, 7/14/2010) • August 2010 - 2 (8/10/2010, 8/25/2010) • September 2010 - 4 (9/6/2010, 9/7/2010, 9/8/2010, 9/27/2010) Table 10 Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities, Apollo Street Site July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 Component Name Type Location Date Installed Activity - Date of Activity - Date of Activity - Date of Condition Condition Condition Activity Activity Activity

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 5 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (20 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Globe Boom Hard Boom (Primary Parallel to Bulkhead July 2005 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (For C5) Containment)

Hard Boom Fence Boom (Secondary Outermost Component May 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Containment) Add'l Boom Installation - Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was observed once Compartment SE1 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 April 27, 2010 (1 total observations) Inspection - Daily (3 total observations) Inspection - Daily (4 total observations) Inspection - Daily

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment SE2 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (0 total observations) Inspection - Daily (2 total observations) Inspection - Daily (5 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment SE3 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (1 total observations) Inspection - Daily (2 total observations) Inspection - Daily (5 total observations)

Globe Boom Hard Boom (Primary Parallel to bulkhead 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (For SE1-SE3) Containment)

Notes: 1 - Texaco never owned or operated on the 100-120 Apollo Street Property. 2 - Solidifier booms replaced the absorbent booms in C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3 on March 2, 2010 and do not need to be changed out monthly in order to continue functioning. 3 - Sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 8 sheens were observed during the third quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows: • July 2010 - 2 (7/13/2010, 7/14/2010) • August 2010 - 2 (8/10/2010, 8/25/2010) • September 2010 - 4 (9/6/2010, 9/7/2010, 9/8/2010, 9/27/2010) Table 11 Summary of Ambient Air Monitoring August 21 22, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-1 OA-2 OA-3 OA-5 OA-6 OA-8

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.8 <3.1 <3.3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <2.3 <1.8 <1.9 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <10 <8.4 <8.9 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 2.4 2.3 3.6 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 4.5 2.2 4.2 2.9 <0.98 <0.98 2 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 1,2-Dibromoethane ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <4.3 <3.5 <3.7 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <2.3 <1.8 <1.9 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.9 <3.2 <3.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 1.2 <0.98 1 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <1.2 <1 <1.1 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 1.3 1.6 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 1.2 1.3 <1.2 1.8 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dioxane ug/m3 <18 <18 <18 <50 <41 <43 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/m3 1.8 2.7 4.4 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 6 4.2 3 4.7 <0.93 <0.93 2.2 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 2-Chlorotoluene ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2-Hexanone ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 3-Chloropropene ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4.4 <3.5 <3.8 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 4-Isopropyltoluene ug/m3 <1.1 1.2 1.8 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 1.7 1.2 <1.1 1.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Acetone ug/m3 33 44 42 45 31 <29 36 34 44 44 15 16 31 27 12 19 <12 17 12 12 Benzene ug/m3 1 1.8 7.6 <1.8 <1.4 <1.5 2.6 12 7.1 7.3 0.76 0.69 2.9 0.68 <0.64 <0.64 <0.64 0.68 <0.64 <0.64 Benzyl chloride ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.8 <3 <3.2 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) ug/m3 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <2.4 <2 <2.1 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 Bromoform ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <5.8 <4.7 <5 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Bromomethane ug/m3 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4.4 <3.5 <3.7 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.5 <2.8 <3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 Chloroethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.7 <3 <3.2 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chloroform ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.7 <2.2 <2.3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Chloromethane ug/m3 1.3 1.3 1.4 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.5 <2.1 <2.2 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 1 of 2 Table 11 Summary of Ambient Air Monitoring August 21 22, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-1 OA-2 OA-3 OA-5 OA-6 OA-8

Cumene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Cyclohexane ug/m3 10 7.7 65 2.5 3.1 2.5 13 39 51 70 7.4 5.6 19 3.1 <0.69 <0.69 <0.69 1.4 <0.69 <0.69 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.8 <3.9 <4.1 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 2.6 2.6 2.6 15 12 11 2.8 <2.5 15 2.7 9 8.9 2.8 2.7 <2.5 <2.5 2.8 <2.5 3 2.6 Ethanol ug/m3 1900E 3500E 3400E 1200E 1400E 1100E 4400E 4700E 1300E 3500E 110 120 2700E 930E 10 15 13 11 20 15 Ethylbenzene ug/m3 1.2 1.3 1.5 <2.4 <2 <2.1 2.6 1.3 1.5 1.3 <0.87 <0.87 0.93 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 Freon 22 ug/m3 4.5 8.8 4.2 360 300 270 20 3.5 4.2 5 4.6 4.8 4.4 2.4 3 2.4 1.8 2.1 <1.8 2.2 Freon TF ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <4.3 <3.5 <3.7 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <6 <4.8 <5.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Isopropyl alcohol ug/m3 14 16 20 110 130 120 21 19 17 23 <12 <12 22 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 m,p-Xylene ug/m3 3.4 4 3.9 <6.1 <4.9 <5.2 8.7 3.4 4.3 3.4 <2.2 <2.2 2.6 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ug/m3 3.7 8.6 7 <4.1 3.3 <3.5 5.1 4.1 5.2 6.8 2.7 3.2 4.2 5.3 2 3.5 <1.5 1.8 2.6 2 methyl isobutyl ketone ug/m3 2.2 5.4 4.2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 5.1 4.5 <2 4.5 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Methyl methacrylate ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Methyl tert-butyl ether ug/m3 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <2 <1.6 <1.7 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 Methylene Chloride 60 ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.9 <3.9 <4.2 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 1.8 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Naphthalene ug/m3 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <7.3 <5.9 <6.3 3.1 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 n-Butane ug/m3 7.6 8.6 27 4.4 5.5 4.4 14 29 38 28 1.6 1.5 11 3.2 1.2 1.5 <1.2 1.7 1.9 1.6 n-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 n-Heptane ug/m3 2.6 3.6 12 <2.3 2.9 2.6 4.8 15 8.5 12 1.1 1.1 4.5 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 n-Hexane ug/m3 8.7 10 48 3.6 4.1 3.6 16 59 34 49 2 1.8 19 2.6 0.73 0.78 <0.7 2.2 <0.7 <0.7 n-Propylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 sec-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Styrene ug/m3 1.4 <0.85 1 <2.4 <1.9 <2 1 <0.85 <0.85 0.84 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 tert-Butyl alcohol ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <42 <34 <36 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 tert-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Tetrachloroethene 100 ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.8 <3.1 <3.3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <41 <33 <35 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 Toluene ug/m3 11 7.9 7.9 6.7 8.2 7.5 15 6.5 6.1 7.1 2.9 2.2 5.5 1.3 2.4 2.4 1.7 1.6 1.6 2.3 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.5 <2.1 <2.2 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 Trichloroethene 5 ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3 <2.4 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 2.1 3.5 7.8 <3.1 <2.5 <2.7 4.1 23 4.4 9.6 1.5 1.5 7.5 3.7 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Vinyl chloride ug/m3 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <1.4 <1.2 <1.2 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 Xylene (total) ug/m3 4.6 5.5 5.3 3.6 5.2 4.9 12 4.5 5.7 4.7 1.8 1.7 3.5 <0.87 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 Xylene, o- ug/m3 1.2 1.5 1.5 <2.4 <2 <2.1 3 1.2 1.4 1.3 <0.87 <0.87 0.96 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 2 of 2

Appendices

The Benham Companies, LLC

APPENDIX A

TREATED GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT