January 31, 2011

Mr. Edward Hampston, P.E. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Remediation Remedial Bureau D – 12th Floor 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-7013

Re: Former Paragon Oil Terminal and the 100-120 Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint Section – Brooklyn, New York 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010

Dear Mr. Hampston:

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (SAIC), on behalf of Texaco Inc. (Texaco), respectfully submits to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) this combined 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report for 2010. This combined report summarizes the corrective action activities completed on both the above referenced properties for 2010. All work has been completed in accordance with the amended order on Consent Case No. D2-1111-01-09AM between Texaco and NYSDEC dated May 15, 2009.

If you have any questions concerning the information presented in this report, please do not hesitate to contact either Ms. G. M. Harris of Chevron Environmental Management Company on behalf of Texaco at 713-432-2248 or Mr. Peter Cagnetta of SAIC at 717-901-8841.

Sincerely,

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC

Peter J. Cagnetta, CPSS Senior Project Manager/Soil Scientist

PJC:pr cc: G.M. Harris (Texaco) Neil Fletcher (Texaco) Stan Luckoski (Texaco) Jerry Ross (Pillsbury) Sal Geneva (Empire Merchants) Steve Russo (SPR) Steve Malinowski (CA Rich) Justin Kennedy (Roux) Steve Trifiletti (ExxonMobil) Nick Onufrak (BP) Joe White (NYSDEC) Kevin Lumpe (Steel Equities) Ivy Marvel (Brooklyn Public Library)

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com

2010 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT AND 4TH QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT (OCTOBER 1, 2010 TO DECEMBER 31, 2010) FOR THE FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL AND THE 100-120 APOLLO STREET PROPERTY GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK FACILITY #304209

Prepared for:

Texaco Inc. 4800 Fournace Place E520A Bellaire, TX 77401

Prepared by:

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112

January 31, 2011

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 6310 Allentown Boulevard / Harrisburg, PA 17112 / tel: 717.901.8100 / www.saic.com TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 2.0 4th Quarterly Status Report ...... 2 2.1 Landside Recovery System ...... 2 2.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Operations ...... 2 2.1.1.1 October 2010 ...... 3 2.1.1.2 November 2010 ...... 3 2.1.1.3 December 2010 ...... 3 2.1.2 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance ...... 3 2.1.3 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring...... 4 2.1.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ...... 5 2.1.6 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance ...... 5 2.1.7 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...... 6 2.2 Newtown Creek Containment System ...... 6 2.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal ...... 7 2.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property ...... 7 2.2.3 Monthly Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing ...... 8 2.2.4 Containment and Absorption System Enhancements ...... 8 2.3 Site Characterization Activities ...... 9 2.3.1 Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging ...... 9 3.0 Annual Progress Report ...... 10 3.1 Landside Recovery Systems ...... 10 3.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Performance...... 10 3.1.2 Groundwater and PSH Capture ...... 10 3.1.3 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance and Operational Enhancements ..... 11 3.1.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring ...... 13 3.1.5 Odor Control Measures ...... 14 3.2 Newtown Creek Containment System ...... 14 3.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal ...... 15 3.2.1.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring ...... 15 3.2.1.2 Summary of Seep Mitigation ...... 15 3.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property ...... 16 3.2.2.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring ...... 16 3.2.3 Summary of Bulkhead Inspections and Resealing...... 16 3.3 Summary of Additional Activities ...... 17 3.3.1 Summary of Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging ...... 17 3.3.2 Voluntary Sub-Slab Depressurization System Performance ...... 17 3.3.3 Indoor Well inspections and Slab Maintenance...... 18 3.3.4 Ambient Air Monitoring Program ...... 18 3.3.5 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event ...... 19

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 2 - January 31, 2011

4.0 Planned Activities for 2011 ...... 20 4.1 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring...... 20 4.2 Performance Evaluation of ExxonMobil Recovery Wells RW-25 and RW-26 ...... 20 4.3 Annual Groundwater Monitoring ...... 20 4.4 Monthly Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance...... 21 4.5 Biannual Ambient Air Monitoring...... 21 4.6 Startup of the Vapor Phase Recovery System ...... 21 4.7 Continued Operation of the Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...... 21 4.8 Continued Operation of the TFR System...... 22 4.9 Development of Alternative Analysis Reports ...... 22

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map ...... Following Text Figure 2 Location of Total Fluids Recovery System ...... Following Text Figure 3 Total Fluids Recovery System Process Flow Schematic ...... Following Text Figure 4 4th Quarter Recovered PSH and Maintenance Timeline ...... Following Text Figure 5 Cumulative and Weekly PSH Recovered ...... Following Text Figure 6a 4th Quarter Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 6b 4th Quarter Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 7 Sub-Slab Depressurization System ...... Following Text Figure 8 Sub-Slab Depressurization System Process Flow Schematic ...... Following Text Figure 9 Plan View of Boom Containment and Absorption System ...... Following Text Figure 10 Boom Containment Compartments 1 to 4 Photo Compilation ...... Following Text Figure 11 Boom Containment Compartment 5 Photo Compilation ...... Following Text Figure 12 Boom Containment Compartments SE1 to SE3 Photo Compilation ... Following Text Figure 13a Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 13b Annual Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells, PSH Thickness vs. Time ...... Following Text Figure 14 Interpreted Groundwater Capture Zone, Pumping at High Tide, September 21, 2010 at 8:20 ...... Following Text Figure 15 Interpreted Groundwater Capture Zone, Pumping at Low Tide, September 21, 2010 at 14:35 ...... Following Text Figure 16 Sheen Detections in the Boom Systems from 2008 to 2010 ...... Following Text Figure 17 2010 Ambient Air Sampling Locations ...... Following Text

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 3 - January 31, 2011

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis ...... Following Text Table 2 4th Quarter Total Fluids Recovery System Operation ...... Following Text Table 3 4th Quarter Summary of Individual Well Flow-Rates ...... Following Text Table 4 4th Quarter PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring Wells ...... Following Text Table 5 4th Quarter PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Recovery Wells ...... Following Text Table 6 4th Quarter NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results ...... Following Text Table 7 4th Quarter Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results ...... Following Text Table 8 4th Quarter Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System Monitoring Results...... Following Text Table 9 4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities - Paragon Site ...... Following Text Table 10 4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities - Apollo Street Site ...... Following Text Table 11 Annual Summary of Total Fluids Recovered ...... Following Text Table 12 Annual PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring and Recovery Wells ...... Following Text Table 13 Annual Summary of Fluids Removed from System during Equipment Cleaning Activities ...... Following Text Table 14 Annual Summary of NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results ...... Following Text Table 15 Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results .. Following Text Table 16 Ambient Air Sampling Results, February 27-28, 2010 ...... Following Text Table 17 Ambient Air Sampling Results, August 21-22, 2010 ...... Following Text

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A NYCDEP Treated Groundwater Discharge Permit ...... Following Text Appendix B Recovered Fluids Transportation and Recycling Documentation ...... Following Text Appendix C 4th Quarter Weekly Well Gauging Sheets ...... Following Text Appendix D Spent Carbon and Organoclay Transportation Forms ...... Following Text Appendix E Completed Boom Inspection Forms ...... Following Text

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1 Groundwater Contour Map, November 30, 2010 ...... In Back Pocket Plate 2 PSH Thickness and Extent, November 30, 2010 ...... In Back Pocket

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 1 - January 31, 2011

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (SAIC), on behalf of Texaco Inc. (Texaco), respectfully submits to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) this 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report for the activities performed at the former Paragon Oil Terminal property (Paragon site) and the adjacent 100-120 Apollo Street property (Apollo Street site). The Paragon site is located at 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street, Brooklyn, New York. Figure 1 presents the regional site setting and identifies the site. The Paragon Oil Company operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1934 to 1958, and Texaco operated a petroleum bulk storage terminal on the Paragon site from 1958 to 1968. Neither the Paragon Oil Company nor Texaco ever owned or maintained operations on the Apollo Street site. In May 2009, Texaco signed an amended Order on Consent Case No. D2-1111-01-09AM for the implementation of site-wide corrective action on both properties. This report summarizes the corrective action activities completed on both sites in 2010 and the quarterly activities completed from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property January 31, 2011

2.0 4TH QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT

This chapter summarizes the activities completed from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The activities include the performance, maintenance, enhancements, and monitoring of both the landside recovery system and the Newtown Creek containment system.

2.1 Landside Recovery System

This section presents operational details concerning the performance, maintenance, and monitoring of the Total Fluids Recovery (TFR) system, which was made operational on September 14, 2007. The TFR system is currently in operation at the bulkheads bordering Newtown Creek on both the Paragon and Apollo Street sites, at the location of a former phase- separated hydrocarbon (PSH) seep through the bulkhead. Figure 2 presents the location of the TFR system. The primary objective of the TFR system has been to stop the seep of PSH and sheens into Newtown Creek. The TFR system has been successful at stopping the seep of PSH entirely and reducing the presence of sheens to an infrequent occurrence. No sheens were present in the months of November and December 2010 in any of compartments. Figure 3 provides a process flow diagram for the TFR system.

2.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Operations

The primary objective of the system is to maintain reversed PSH and groundwater gradients in order to prevent PSH from seeping into the creek. The achievement of this objective has been maintained through the 4th quarter of operations.

During the 4th quarter of 2010, 296 gallons of PSH were recovered by the TFR system and 2,816,300 gallons of water were recovered and treated at an average rate of 31,355 gallons per day (gpd). This discharge rate is in compliance with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) dewatering permit discharge limit of 57,600 gpd. Copies of the permits are presented in Appendix A. The processed-water-to-recovered-PSH ratio for the 4th quarter of 2010 was 9,515:1. Figure 4 presents the weekly and cumulative recovered PSH values, as well as upgrade and maintenance activities completed in the 4th quarter of 2010. Figure 5 presents the weekly and cumulative recovered PSH values since the recovery system became operational. Table 1 presents weekly total system volumes of treated effluent water and recovered PSH.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 3 - January 31, 2011

2.1.1.1 October 2010

During the month of October, 126 gallons of PSH and 1,100,369 gallons of water were recovered. The fluids were processed through the treatment system at an average rate of 25 gallons per minute (gpm). All 13 TFR wells operated during October 2010. A total system uptime of 99.6% was maintained during October 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. Operational enhancements were not necessary during October 2010.

2.1.1.2 November 2010

During the month of November, 92 gallons of PSH and 865,731 gallons of water were recovered. The fluids were processed through the treatment system at an average rate of 21 gpm. All 13 TFR wells operated during November 2010. A total system uptime of 94.8% was maintained during November 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational enhancements and upgrades made during November 2010: November 1 and 2 – Pulled, cleaned, and reinstalled all 13 TFR pumps. November 8 – A new cycle counter was installed on CMW-43R. November 16 – Ceased injection of Verox 8 biocide into the pre-OWS tank. Water temperatures had decreased to a point where biological activity was inhibited.

2.1.1.3 December 2010

During the month of December, 78 gallons of PSH and 850,200 gallons of water were recovered. The fluids were processed through the treatment system at an average rate of 19 gpm. All 13 TFR wells operated during December 2010. A total system uptime of 98.4% was maintained during December 2010. A summary of individual recovery well uptimes is presented in Table 2. The following is a list of operational enhancements and upgrades made during December 2010: December 13 – Pulled, inspected, and reinstalled all 13 TFR pumps. The pumps in wells CMW-59R, MW-68R and MW-70R were cleaned prior to reinstallation.

2.1.2 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance

A vacuum truck was utilized periodically for TFR equipment maintenance. All vacuum truck services were contracted through Atlantic Response, Inc., of East Brunswick, New Jersey. The vacuum truck was used to complete the following activities: Removal of recovered PSH from the product holding tank; Removal of accumulated sludge in the oil-water separator (OWS) and the pre-OWS fractionation tank; and Removal of accumulated backwash sediment in the backwash tanks.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 4 - January 31, 2011

The primary objective of these cleaning events was to ensure optimal performance of the coalescing media in the OWS, limit sludge build-up in the PSH transfer pumps, and to clean and confirm the functionality of the various float switches in the process equipment.

Removal and cleaning activities were completed on October 26, 2010 and December 7, 2010. A total of 5,748 gallons of recovered fluids were transported to FCC Environmental in Wilmington, Delaware for recycling. The Bill of Lading and receiving reports for the transportation of the recovered fluids are presented in Appendix B.

All TFR pumps were inspected on a monthly basis by removing them from the well to verify the integrity and proper operation. In addition, weekly inspections were performed to confirm that the air pressure regulators and cycle counters associated with each pump (located in the well vault) were operational. Cycle counter readings were collected during these weekly inspections and used to calculate an estimated flow rate per recovery well. A summary of the weekly TFR flow rates per well is presented in Table 3.

Zinc anodes were utilized on each of the TFR pumps to limit the effects of corrosion from the brackish groundwater. The anodes were installed below the pumping water level in each well and replaced every one to two months, as needed, during the monthly pump inspection.

The organoclay and granular-activated carbon (GAC) filter media were replaced on December 1, 2010. The spent carbon (4,000 lbs.) was transported off-site for reactivation on December 16, 2010. Spent organoclay (1,000 lbs.) was transported off-site for disposal on December 14, 2010. Manifests and transportation documents are presented in Appendix D.

2.1.3 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring

Monitoring and recovery wells along the upper and lower bulkheads were gauged several times per month this quarter using an oil-water interface probe for depth to water and PSH thickness. PSH thickness observations for all upper bulkhead monitoring wells, lower bulkhead monitoring wells, and recovery wells are provided in Tables 4 and 5 and presented in Figures 6a and 6b. The gauging data sheets for this quarter are presented in Appendix C.

The presence of PSH in the monitoring wells was limited to CMW-54 on the upper bulkhead, where the thicknesses ranged from 0.09 to 0.46 feet. No other monitoring wells on the upper bulkhead contained PSH during the 4th quarter of 2010. The six other monitoring wells on the upper bulkhead (MW-72, CMW-23S, CMW-23D, CMW-55, and CMW-56) did not contain PSH in the 4th quarter of 2010.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 5 - January 31, 2011

PSH was present in four out of five monitoring wells on the lower bulkhead. PSH thicknesses ranged from 0.13 feet in CMW-57 to 2.04 feet in MW-69. The monitoring wells that do contain PSH on the lower bulkhead (MW-67, MW-69, CMW-57 and CMW-58) are within the capture zone of the recovery wells. The hydraulic and PSH containment and capture induced by recovery wells MW-68R and MW-70R has stopped sheens from entering the creek in the boom compartments fronting the area of the lower bulkhead. Sheens have been absent in C1 since November 2008 (25 months) and in C2 since January 2009 (23 months). All compartments were sheen-free in November and December 2010. Monitoring well MW-66 borders the eastern end of the capture zone and historically has not contained PSH.

2.1.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring

In accordance with a May 28, 2010 approval letter from NYCDEP, Texaco is conditionally authorized to discharge 57,600 gpd of treated effluent to the combined sewer. Compliance with the discharge permit requires one sample to be collected quarterly from the final treated discharge and analyzed for the list of contaminants presented in Table 6. The final treated discharge sample port is identified as TS-4. The required quarterly compliance sample was submitted for analysis on December 7, 2010 (see Table 6). Permit compliance has been maintained through the 4th quarter of 2010.

Additional internal quality assurance (QA) sampling events for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) were used to monitor the influent chemistry (mass loading) and to assist in scheduling organoclay and GAC change-outs. Table 7 presents the analytical data from the internal QA performance monitoring samples collected this quarter. BTEX samples were collected from the following locations: TS-1: Untreated Influent; TS-2: Post-Organoclay Unit; TS-3: Post-GAC Unit 1 (GAC-1); and TS-4: Final Treated Discharge (post-GAC-2).

2.1.6 Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance

An inspection of all indoor monitoring wells was completed monthly. The purpose of each inspection was to ensure the structural integrity of the steel lid and the compression cap to prevent the possibility of vapor intrusion. Components that were examined included the steel well flush-mount lids, gaskets, and compression plugs. Individual components were replaced as deemed necessary to maintain the integrity of the surface seals. After the inspection had been completed, the flush-mount lids were caulked to create an airtight seal with the floor, further reducing the potential for vapor intrusion from the subsurface.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 6 - January 31, 2011

2.1.7 Sub-Slab Depressurization System

The voluntary sub-slab depressurization (SSD) system was restarted on August 29, 2010. The system operated only while personnel were on-site (10 hours per day, four days per week). Monitoring occurred twice per week, with the measurement of induced subsurface vacuum valves at points E-1 through E-7 and lateral H-2. The system actively extracted subsurface air from H-1 and H-3. Air velocity readings and methane and PID concentrations were collected at the active laterals H-1 and H-3, at the header manifold, and at both vapor- phase GAC units. Figure 7 shows the locations of each of the extraction points and laterals. Figure 8 shows a process flow schematic for the SSD system.

The system was designed to achieve a minimum of 0.01 inches of water column (in. WC) in the subsurface while effectively capturing petroleum vapors. The system operated at an average induced vacuum of 0.07 in. WC, which is above the subsurface design vacuum of 0.01 in. WC. The average extraction flow rate is 8 cubic feet per minute (cfm).

Vapors were extracted through the laterals H-1 and H-3. The lateral H-2 remained closed and operated as an induced vacuum monitoring point. The vertical points acted as monitoring points for induced vacuum in the subsurface. Table 8 summarizes the field monitoring parameters collected during the 4th quarter.

2.2 Newtown Creek Containment System

The details concerning the performance, maintenance, and monitoring of the Newtown Creek boom containment systems are presented in this section. The Newtown Creek boom containment systems are currently installed along 360 linear feet of Newtown Creek fronting the Paragon site and 67 feet along the Apollo Street site. This boom system is maintained by Texaco. The 427 linear feet of globe boom (primary containment) is divided into 5 watertight compartments, with compartments 1 to 4 (C1-C4) fronting the Paragon site and compartment 5 (C5) fronting the Apollo Street site. A fence boom extends the entire 427 feet along both properties (secondary containment).

Additionally, a three-compartment containment boom system (SE1, SE2, and SE3), installed by ExxonMobil and maintained by Texaco, extends from the western terminus of the secondary containment fence boom to the west end of Apollo Street, with SE1 adjacent to C5 and SE3 adjacent to Apollo Street. Figure 9 presents a plan view of the two boom systems.

During the 4th quarter a total of 5 sheens were observed on Newtown Creek outside of the secondary containment fence boom. Four sheens were observed in October 2010 and 1 sheen was observed in November 2010 outside of the secondary containment fence boom. No

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 7 - January 31, 2011 sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed in December 2010. The source of these sheens was unknown and they were not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites.

2.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal

Compartments C1 to C4 were inspected and photographed twice daily at least four days per week. Figure 10 presents photographs of the typical conditions in each boom compartment during the quarter. A summary of these inspections revealed that: Sheens were absent in C1, C2, C3, and C4 – all four compartments this quarter.

Table 9 provides a summary of details of the boom containment system fronting the Paragon site. Completed boom inspection forms for this quarter are included as Appendix E.

The water quality within compartments C1 to C4 has greatly improved since the completion of the full-scale grout wall in the 4th quarter of 2006, the start-up of the TFR system in September 2007, and the sealing of the bulkhead seams of the Paragon site in September 2008. A sheen has not been observed in C1 since November 2008 (25 months) nor in C2 since January 2009 (23 months).

2.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property

Compartment C5 is inspected and photographed twice daily at least four days per week, and compartments SE1, SE2, and SE3 are inspected when visible from land and photographed during monthly creekside bulkhead inspections. The location of the three-compartment boom system prevents taking daily photographs from land due to the sloped earthen embankment above the Apollo Street site concrete gravity wall. Photographs of C5 depicting typical conditions within this compartment are presented in Figure 11. Figure 12 presents photographs of the conditions in SE1, SE2, and SE3 during the monthly creekside boat inspections. A summary of the inspections reveals that: Sheens were absent in C5 in November and December 2010, and only one sheen was observed in C5 in October 2010; Sheens were absent in SE1, SE2, and SE3 this quarter. Sheens have been absent in SE3 since January 2009 (2 years) when observations first began.

Table 10 provides a summary of details of the boom containment system fronting the Apollo Street site. Completed boom inspection forms for the quarter are included in Appendix E.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 8 - January 31, 2011

2.2.3 Monthly Creekside Bulkhead Inspection and Resealing

Once per month, a creekside inspection of the containment boom systems along both sites is completed by boat. This includes the floating boom systems in Newtown Creek along both sites, the steel bulkhead and epoxy-sealed seams on the Paragon site, and the concrete gravity wall and barrier membrane fronting C5 on the Apollo Street site. The purpose is to confirm the integrity of the containment systems, ensure they are performing as designed, and maintain or repair them as needed.

The containment boom systems were inspected for possible rips, tears, and other deficiencies in the HDPE liner. In addition, the booms were checked to ensure freedom to travel with the tides on their vertical anchoring points and that they were in good general condition. During this quarter, there were no deficiencies observed in the booms with respect to containment.

Seam-by-seam visual inspections of the Paragon site steel bulkhead and the Apollo site membrane barrier were conducted concurrently with the boom maintenance activities on October 21, December 2, and December 22, 2010. The portions of the steel bulkhead and barrier membrane above mean sea level were inspected by boat. No divers were utilized during the 4th quarter of 2010 bulkhead inspection activities. During the October 21, December 2, and December 22, 2010 inspections, seams in need of maintenance were addressed by reapplying epoxy to portions of individual seams. Of the 180 bulkhead seams that were previously sealed in 2008, only parts of 18 seams required application of additional epoxy this quarter. The 4th quarter epoxy applications were for preventative maintenance, as sheens were absent in C1 to C4 during the quarter.

Creekside photographs of the containment boom sections along the Paragon site (C1 through C4) and along the Apollo site (C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3) were taken during the October 21, December 2, and December 22, 2010 creekside inspections.

2.2.4 Containment and Absorption System Enhancements

Enhancements were not needed for the Paragon site and Apollo Street site containment boom systems. Currently, solidifier booms occupy all compartments in the containment boom systems on both sites. Solidifier booms are more efficient at absorbing and retaining small quantities of sheen and, therefore, did not need to be changed this quarter. No shipments of spent solidifier booms were transported off-site this quarter.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 9 - January 31, 2011

2.3 Site Characterization Activities

Site characterization activities consisted of on-site and regional well gauging in the 4th quarter of 2010.

2.3.1 Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging

A regional monitoring well gauging event coordinated between BP, ExxonMobil, and Texaco was conducted on November 30, 2010. Regional monitoring well gauging events are scheduled to coincide with a high or low tide. The 4th quarter event coincided with a low tide. Wells that have been identified as being influenced by the tide from Newtown Creek were gauged between one hour before and one hour after the designated National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicted low tide. The wells that are not influenced by the tide from Newtown Creek were gauged the same day, as close to the NOAA predicted low tide as possible.

The gauging data from the November 30, 2010 event were used to construct a regional groundwater contour map, which is presented as Plate 1. Groundwater elevations observed in the ExxonMobil Off-Site area are slightly lower than typically observed. The general hydraulic gradients and interpreted groundwater flow direction in the zones of PSH and impacted groundwater remains away from Newtown Creek, toward either the TFR system or the ExxonMobil Off-Site Recovery System. A PSH thickness and extent map is presented as Plate 2. The lateral extent of the PSH is generally consistent with previously observed data.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 10 - January 31, 2011

3.0 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

This chapter summarizes the activities completed from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The activities summarized are related to the landside recovery system and the Newtown Creek containment system.

3.1 Landside Recovery Systems

This section presents operational details concerning the annual performance, maintenance, enhancements, and monitoring of the TFR system.

3.1.1 Total Fluids Recovery System Performance

Three thousand two hundred and sixty-two (3,262) gallons of PSH were recovered by the TFR system, along with 10,606,975 gallons of water that were treated at an average rate of 30,915 gpd, in 2010. The NYCDEP dewatering permit was renewed on May 28, 2010, increasing the permitted limit from 43,000 gpd to 57,600 gpd. Permit compliance has been maintained throughout 2010. The processed water to recovered PSH ratio for 2010 was 3,252:1. Table 11 presents the recovered fluids by month for 2010. The TFR system has recovered 30,571 gallons of PSH since start-up in September of 2007, and prior to operation of the TFR system, 11,697 gallons of PSH were recovered from bulkhead monitoring wells. The objective of the TFR system is to maintain both a groundwater and PSH gradient, landside of the bulkhead, such that the effective fluid capture is maintained, and the seep is mitigated. This objective has been achieved and the system continues to operate to maintain the reversed gradients.

3.1.2 Groundwater and PSH Capture

Monitoring and recovery wells along the upper and lower bulkheads were gauged once per week using an oil-water interface probe for depth to water and PSH thickness during 2010. The tidal cycles of Newtown Creek regularly influence the depths to water and PSH thickness in the wells along the bulkhead. PSH thickness observations for all upper and lower bulkhead wells for 2010 are provided in Table 12 and in Figures 13a and 13b. .

During 2010, the measured PSH thicknesses in the wells on both the upper and lower bulkhead have, on average, decreased, with the exception of CMW-57, which increased slightly. This can be seen in Figures 13a and 13b, where the linear trend lines show the general behavior of the PSH thicknesses.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 11 - January 31, 2011

To update the interpreted capture zone behind the bulkhead of the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites, pressure transducers were deployed during the 1st and 3rd quarters of 2010 to collect automated water level data. The following is a summary of the transducer deployment events: Deployed transducers included In-Situ 15psi Level 500 Troll© and Level 700 Troll© model water level transducers with 25 to 50 foot vented cables with Teflon© coating. Transducers were deployed between March 8 and March 12, 2010 and September 20 and September 30, 2010 in Newtown Creek and in the following wells: CMW-21, CMW-23S, CMW-39, CMW-54, CMW-55, CMW-56, CMW-57, CMW-58, MW-66, MW-67, MW-72, MW-76, MW-77, and RIMW-01. The datasets used in the capture zone interpretations were collected on March 9, 2010 at 4:39 AM for high tide and 10:42 AM for low tide and on September 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM for high tide and 2:35 PM for low tide. Manual gauging data collected at the beginning and the end of the deployment were used to confirm the accuracy of the transducer data collected. Recovery wells were manually gauged during the NOAA predicted high and low tides during the transducer deployment due to the inability to place pressure transducers inside pumping wells. Manual gauging data correlated well with pressure transducer data. All transducer data was considered as well as manual gauging data from the recovery wells were considered during the development of the capture maps.

Figures 14 and 15 present the interpreted groundwater contours and capture zones induced by the operation of the TFR system at high and low tide, respectively, on September 21, 2010. The interpreted capture zone associated with the thirteen TFR wells indicates that reversed hydraulic and PSH gradients are maintained landside at both low and high tides on the creek. This interpreted conceptual site model is consistent with observations in the boom system where the seepage of PSH no longer exists across all boom compartments and only limited, intermittent sheens are observed.

3.1.3 Total Fluids Recovery System Maintenance and Operational Enhancements

A vacuum truck was utilized periodically during 2010 for TFR system maintenance. All vacuum truck services were contracted through Atlantic Response, Inc. of East Brunswick, NJ. The vacuum truck was used to complete the following activities: Off-site removal of recovered PSH from the product holding tank; Off-site removal of any accumulated sludges in the OWS and the pre-OWS fractionation tank; and Off-site removal of any accumulated backwash water.

A summary of the off-site removal activities in 2010 is presented in Table 13. A total of 52,815 gallons of recovered liquids were transported to FCC Environmental in Wilmington, Delaware for recycling.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 12 - January 31, 2011

The organoclay and GAC filter media were replaced a total of 4 times throughout the year, on the following dates: February 24, 2010; March 23, 2010; June 8, 2010; and December 1, 2010.

A total of 4,000 lbs. of organoclay were disposed of at Veolia Environmental Services in Port Arthur, TX, and 16,000 lbs. of spent carbon were reactivated at Siemens in Darlington, PA in 2010.

In addition to the standard operational maintenance activities performed during 2010, many operational enhancements were completed. These operational enhancements were implemented with the purpose of increasing operational efficiency, reducing maintenance time and costs, and repairing or upgrading existing equipment. The following operational enhancements were implemented in 2010: January 11 to 13, 2010 – Replaced 450 feet of combined treated effluent and sanitary sewer piping in the Empire Merchants warehouse. January 14, 2010 – Replaced the cycle counter on PW-2R. January 20, 2010 – Replaced the QED Short AP-4/TL TFR pump in CMW-43R for refurbishing with 316 stainless steel parts. January 26, 2010 – Replaced the cycle counter on CMW-63R. March 3, 2010 – CMW-17R was brought online as a TFR well, utilizing a QED Long AP-4/TL TFR pump. March 16, 2010 – Replaced the cycle counter on CMW-17R. March 23 to 26, 2010 – Replaced the existing coated steel groundwater treatment vessels (organoclay and activated carbon units) with more corrosion resistant fiberglass models of the same size and specifications. April 12, 2010 – A Rhino-Liner© was installed in the secondary containment pan of the water treatment building for improved corrosion protection. May 27, 2010 – Replaced the QED Long AP-4/TL TFR pump in CMW-63R with an on- site spare. June 2, 2010 – Replaced the QED Short AP-4/TL TFR pump with an on-site QED Long AP-4/TL TFR pump. June 10, 2010 – Replaced the ball check valve on the fluid intake of the QED Long AP-4/TL TFR pump in CMW-59R. June 21, 2010 – Replaced the pump that transfers water from the final chamber of the OWS to the untreated water holding tank. June 29, 2010 – Replaced the QED Long AP-4/TL TFR pump in PW-2R with an on- site spare. July 1, 2010 – Replaced cycle counter on CMW-59R. July 8, 2010 – Replaced regulator on CMW-64R.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 13 - January 31, 2011

July 13, 2010 – Replaced the hose clamp on the total fluids line from the pump in MW-75R, due to corrosion. August 2, 2010 – Completed the installation of the independent HDPE treated effluent discharge pipe (secondary contained). Treated effluent is now transferred directly to the public sewer trap via this HDPE line and is independent of the Empire Merchants sanitary sewer line. August 10, 2010 – Replaced the QED Long AP-4/TL pump in CMW-59R with an on- site spare. August 16, 2010 – TFR wells MW-74R and MW-75R were shut off, with permission from NYSDEC, to perform a limited pilot test to determine whether sediment loading on the TFR system can be reduced while maintaining groundwater capture along the bulkhead. The results of this pilot test were reported in the 3rd Quarterly Status Report, dated October 29, 2010, and capture can be maintained with these two TFR wells offline. August 16, 2010 – Replaced the hose clamp for the air line leading to the TFR pump in CMW-59R, due to corrosion. August 24, 2010 – Replaced the hose clamp for total fluids line from the TFR pump in MW-73R, due to corrosion. August 26, 2010 – A chemical feed pilot study of Verox 8 biocide began. The biocide was injected into the pre-OWS fractionation tank to inhibit bacterial growth. August 31, 2010 – Replaced the hose clamp for the total fluids line from the TFR pump in PW-2R, due to corrosion. September 27, 2010 – MW-75R resumed operations after completion of the pilot test period. September 28, 2010 – MW-74R resumed operations after completion of the pilot test period. November 8 – A new cycle counter was installed on CMW-43R. November 16 – Cease injection of Verox 8 biocide into the pre-OWS tank. Water temperatures had decreased to a point where biological activity was inhibited.

3.1.4 Treated Water Discharge Monitoring

The analytical results from quarterly and additional internal QA sampling events for January 2010 through December 2010 are presented in Tables 14 and 15, respectively. All analytical results for TS-4 from permit compliance samples have satisfied the NYCDEP permit criteria.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 14 - January 31, 2011

3.1.5 Odor Control Measures

Throughout 2010, many odor control measures were implemented across the site and treatment system. These modifications were made to reduce nuisance odors from the daily operations and maintenance of the TFR system. Daily field monitoring of nuisance odors ensured that health and safety action levels were never exceeded in 2010. The following modifications were made to reduce or remove nuisance odors: Modified the well-head assemblies to be vapor-tight, using Fernco© fittings and threaded plugs. Redirected the TFR pump exhaust back into the TFR wells. Installed fittings and piping to allow backwashing to occur in closed tanks with fixed lines. Installed two 55-gallon GAC units at the end of the vent fan to the OWS building. The fan removed nuisance odors from inside the OWS building during maintenance activities. All secondary containment conveyance piping that enters the water treatment building, the OWS building, or the well vaults were sealed using Fernco© reducer fittings. All vents and ports on the untreated water storage tank and the pre-OWS tank were sealed.

These modifications have removed the majority of the nuisance odors associated with the operations of the TFR system. Additional measures will be implemented as operations continue and opportunities present themselves.

3.2 Newtown Creek Containment System

This section presents operational details concerning the annual performance, maintenance, enhancements, and monitoring of the Newtown Creek containment system. During 2010, a total of 23 sheens were observed on Newtown Creek outside of the secondary containment fence boom and were not associated with the Paragon or Apollo Street sites. Five sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed during the 1st quarter, 5 sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed during the 2nd quarter, 8 sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed during the 3rd quarter, and 5 sheens outside of the secondary containment fence boom were observed during the 4th quarter. The source of these sheens was unknown and they were independent of the Paragon and Apollo Street sites.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 15 - January 31, 2011

3.2.1 Former Paragon Oil Terminal

3.2.1.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring

During 2010, observations of C1 to C4 revealed that: No sheens were observed in C1 in 2010 across 196 observations. Sheens were absent 100% of the observed time. No sheens were observed in C2 in 2010 across 196 observations. Sheens were absent 100% of the observed time. One sheen was observed in C3 in 2010 across 196 observations. Sheens were absent 99.5% of the observed time. Sheens were observed 6 times in C4 in 2010 across 196 observations. Sheens were absent 97% of the observed time; however, no sheens were observed in the 4th quarter of 2010.

Figure 16 shows the sheen detections in compartments C1 through C5 within the boom containment system of the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites along Newtown Creek from 2008 to 2010 by quarter. There has been a significant reduction in the number of sheens observed in 2010. Sheen detections peaked in the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2008 and decreased steadily into 2010. A total of 484 sheens were observed in 2008 in compartments C1 through C4, compared to a total of only 7 sheens observed in 2010 in compartments C1 through C4. There were no sheens observed in 4th quarter 2010. This is a significant reduction in the observation of sheens in the boom containment system in Newtown Creek along the Paragon Site in 2010. The reduced frequency of sheens is attributable to the continued operation of the landside TFR system and the completion and maintenance of the Paragon Site steel bulkhead seam sealing.

3.2.1.2 Summary of Seep Mitigation

The condition of the water in compartments C1 through C4 have been improving steadily since the construction of the grout wall in the 4th quarter of 2006, the startup of the TFR system in September 2007, and the sealing of the bulkhead seams of the Paragon Site in September 2008. The seep has been mitigated.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 16 - January 31, 2011

3.2.2 100-120 Apollo Street Property

3.2.2.1 Summary of Containment and Absorption System Monitoring

During 2010, observations of C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3 revealed that: Sheens were absent 99% of the observed time. Sheens were observed twice in C5 in 2010 across 196 observations. SE1 was visible 71 times in 2010. During the 1st and 2nd quarters, sheens were absent 78% of the observed time, and in the 3rd and 4th quarters, sheens were absent 96% of the observed time. SE2 was visible 66 times in 2010. During the 1st and 2nd quarters, sheens were absent 89% of the observed time, and in the 3rd and 4th quarters, sheens were absent 100% of the observed time. SE3 was visible 59 times in 2010. Sheens were absent 100% of the observed time during 2010.

Figure 16 shows the sheen detections in the boom systems of the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites along Newtown Creek from 2008 to 2010 by quarter. Sheen detections peaked in the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2008 and decreased steadily into 2010. A total of 250 sheens were observed in 2008 in compartment C5, compared to a total of 30 sheens observed in 2009 and only 2 sheens in 2010. This is a significant reduction in the observation of sheens in the boom containment system along the Apollo Street Site.

Visual observations of SE1, SE2, and SE3 did not begin until January 2009, with a total of 33 observed sheens in SE1, 9 observed sheens in SE2, and 2 observed sheens in SE3. Observations in 2010 showed a reduction in sheen observations with 9 observed sheens in SE1, 4 observed sheens in SE2, and no sheens observed in SE3.

3.2.3 Summary of Bulkhead Inspections and Resealing

In the 100-120 Apollo St Property IRM Construction Summary Report and OM&M Plan dated February 10, 2009, a bulkhead inspection plan was presented for the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites. The plan included a series of monthly above-water inspections and one annual underwater inspection of the Paragon and Apollo Site bulkheads. The monthly creekside inspections began in March 2009 and continued through 2010.

During the annual below water inspection completed between August 23 and 26, 2010, divers were used to inspect the bulkhead below the surface of Newtown Creek along the Paragon and Apollo Street sites. As a precaution, portions of 42 seams below the waterline along the steel

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 17 - January 31, 2011 bulkhead were maintained using marine epoxy during this inspection. In addition, 4 locations on the barrier membrane in C5 were repaired using marine epoxy. During monthly and annual inspections, areas where supplemental epoxy was needed were noted on the inspection forms. These areas were reinforced during the bulkhead inspections or soon thereafter. A summary of the 2010 bulkhead and/or barrier application activities follows: 1st quarter – 14 seams in the steel bulkhead required application of additional epoxy, and none of the seals in the Apollo Street membrane required additional epoxy. 2nd quarter – 17 seams in the steel bulkhead required application of additional epoxy, and 2 seals in the Apollo Street membrane required additional epoxy. 3rd quarter – 18 seams in the steel bulkhead required application of additional epoxy, and none of the seals in the Apollo Street membrane required additional epoxy. 4th quarter – 4 seams in the steel bulkhead required application of additional epoxy, and none of the seals in the Apollo Street membrane required additional epoxy.

These prevention maintenance measures contribute greatly to the continued decline and absence of sheens.

3.3 Summary of Additional Activities

The following is a summary of additional activities performed in 2010.

3.3.1 Summary of Regional Groundwater and PSH Gauging

Four regional monitoring well gauging events were coordinated between BP, ExxonMobil, and Texaco during 2010. These events were completed on February 23, 2010, June 21, 2010, August 24, 2010, and November 30, 2010. The gauging data were used to construct regional groundwater contour maps and PSH thickness and extent maps. The maps created from the most recent quarterly gauging data, November 30, 2010, are presented as Plates 1 and 2. The data depicted on these plates are consistent with historical data and provide an indication of the current groundwater movement in the area. The interpreted groundwater flow and lateral PSH extent are consistent with previously reported data.

3.3.2 Voluntary Sub-Slab Depressurization System Performance

Initial startup of the voluntary Sub-Slab Depressurization (SSD) system occurred on April 8, 2010. After 12 days of operations, the system was taken offline due to the potential for constituent breakthrough from the two 1,000-pound GAC units. It was determined that this shut down was a direct result of the SSD system operating above its designed specifications.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 18 - January 31, 2011

The spent carbon was profiled for reactivation and new activated carbon was placed in the vessels during the 3rd quarter of 2010. The system was restarted on August 29, 2010. During the system restart, the SSD system was balanced to achieve the designed operating specifications, while minimizing the constituent loading on the carbon. Current operations are discussed in Section 2.1.7.

3.3.3 Indoor Well inspections and Slab Maintenance

SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, performs monthly inspections of all indoor wells. Components that are examined include well vault lids, gaskets, and compression plugs. Individual components are replaced as deemed necessary to maintain the integrity of the wells. After each well has been inspected, the flush-mount vault lids are caulked to create an airtight seal with the floor, thus reducing the potential for vapor intrusion from the subsurface.

On July 20, 2010, during the annual two-week warehouse shut down, warehouse slab maintenance activities were completed on the floor of the 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street warehouses, as well as the 100-120 Apollo Street warehouse. A total of 32 cracks, totaling 57 linear feet, were sealed in the 42 Bridgewater Street warehouse using 3M DP-600 concrete epoxy.

The primary purpose for sealing the cracks in the warehouse floors is a precautionary measure used to further reduce the potential of any hazards associated with possible vapor intrusion through the floor. The results of the ongoing indoor air monitoring program conducted by CA Rich on behalf of the property owner from 2005 through 2009 and the 2010 data collected by SAIC have indicated that indoor air hazards associated with subsurface impacts are not present. The sealing of the floor seams only serves to further reduce the potential for any hazards.

3.3.4 Ambient Air Monitoring Program

In 2010, Texaco assumed responsibility for the semiannual ambient air quality monitoring events for the Empire Merchants warehouses at 16, 42, and 50 Bridgewater Street and at 100 and 120 Apollo Street. Ambient air quality monitoring events occurred at the Empire Merchants warehouse and office spaces at the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites on February 27-28, 2010 and August 21-22, 2010. A total of 17 summa canisters were deployed across the site during the February sampling event and a total of 20 summa canisters were deployed across the site during the August sampling event. Fourteen summa canisters were located inside the 16, 42 and 50 Bridgewater Street and 100-120 Apollo Street warehouses during both events. During the February sampling event, all three outdoor canisters were located at ground level. During the August sampling event, three of the six outdoor canisters were located on rooftops, while the remaining three were at ground level. The locations of collected air samples are presented in Figure 17.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 19 - January 31, 2011

Breathing zone air quality was also monitored using a PID and an FID during summa canister deployment. The monitoring results for both ambient air quality monitoring events in 2010 are summarized in Tables 16 and 17. The data indicates that the indoor air quality is safe and that the subsurface petroleum is not adversely affecting air quality.

3.3.5 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Event

Groundwater was sampled from a total of 40 monitoring wells on the Paragon and Apollo Street sites between July 20 and July 29, 2010. Samples were collected using low-flow collection protocols (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Standard Operating Procedure for Low-Stress [Low Flow] / Minimal Drawdown Ground-Water Sample Collection, June 16, 2010) and only from monitoring wells that did not contain PSH. All samples were analyzed for the NYSDEC Spill Technology and Remediation Series (STARS) gasoline and fuel oil contaminants. In addition, 7 of the samples were analyzed for the expanded Target Contaminant List for both gasoline and fuel oil, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dissolved RCRA metals, and total dissolved solids. The samples were analyzed by TestAmerica (TA) Laboratories using Methods 8260B, 8270C, 8082, 6010B, 7470A, and 2540C.

The results of the monitoring event are presented in detail in the SAIC document entitled “Supplemental Site Characterization Report” dated November 19, 2010. The following conclusions have been presented in the November 2010 report: 1. Groundwater impacts are present above the NYSDEC Ambient Water Quality Standards (AWQS) values for GA classified groundwater. The VOC exceedances from the NYSDEC STARS gasoline list and the EPA TCL are primarily associated with the PSH plume. 2. The extent of SVOC exceedances in the groundwater above the NYSDEC AWQS values is limited and is associated with the PSH plume. 3. The capture zone induced by the total fluids recovery system at the bulkhead mitigates the migration of PSH and impacted groundwater to Newtown Creek. 4. In the northeastern section of the former Paragon site and the northwestern section of the Apollo Street site, groundwater is not impacted above the NYSDEC AWQS values. Therefore, at these two locations, impacted groundwater is not migrating to Newtown Creek. 5. Arochlors (PCBs) are not present in the groundwater.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 20 - January 31, 2011

4.0 PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR 2011

This section summarizes the site characterization and remedial measures planned for 2011.

4.1 PSH Thickness and Groundwater Elevation Monitoring

Throughout 2011, monitoring of the PSH thickness and groundwater elevation in the upper and lower bulkhead wells will continue on a weekly basis. This data will be used to evaluate the performance of the TFR system.

During the 1st and 3rd quarters of 2011, a performance evaluation of the TFR system will be conducted using similar techniques to those discussed in Section 3.1.1. This includes a pressure transducer deployment, manual gauging, and development of hydraulic capture maps from the resulting data.

Regional groundwater monitoring events will continue throughout 2011 on a quarterly basis. Regional gauging data will be used to evaluate the lateral extent of PSH in the area of the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites.

4.2 Performance Evaluation of ExxonMobil Recovery Wells RW-25 and RW-26

SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, will complete a performance evaluation of the ExxonMobil recovery wells RW-25 and RW-26, located along the southern property boundary along Bridgewater Street. These performance evaluations will be included in the site wide alternatives analysis to be completed by Texaco for site-wide corrective actions across both sites.

4.3 Annual Groundwater Monitoring

In 2010, SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, began a groundwater sampling program for wells not containing PSH. These wells will be sampled one time in 2011 for NY STARS gasoline and fuel oil parameters. A brief work plan will be submitted to NYSDEC for approval prior to the sampling event.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 21 - January 31, 2011

4.4 Monthly Indoor Well Inspections and Slab Maintenance

SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, will continue to perform monthly inspections of all indoor wells in 2011. In addition, SAIC will continue to perform monthly inspections of indoor warehouse slabs on the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites. Cracks and seams will be visually inspected and monitored for any vapor seepage with a PID. Cracks and seams will be sealed using a combination of Sikaflex LM concrete sealant and 3M DP-600 concrete epoxy.

4.5 Biannual Ambient Air Monitoring

In 2011, SAIC, on behalf of Texaco, will continue to implement the existing ambient air sampling program for the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites. Ambient air monitoring will occur on a biannual basis, in February and August of 2011. Summa canisters will be deployed at previous sampling locations during each monitoring event. Breathing zone air quality will be monitored using a PID during summa canister deployment. EPA Methods TO-15 and 3C will be used to analyze the air samples. Results from the ambient air sampling events will be reported in the quarterly progress reports.

4.6 Startup of the Vapor Phase Recovery System

Installation and startup of the VPR system will occur in 2011. This includes the installation of additional VPR piping, the treatment system, and the blower. System design specifications are described in the Phase II Vapor Phase Recovery System Design letter submitted on July 1, 2009. Startup is tentatively scheduled for the 1st quarter of 2011.

The VPR will be a component of the existing TFR system. In addition to groundwater and PSH, petroleum will be extracted from the subsurface through 9 existing recovery wells along the bulkhead. The primary objective of the VPR component is to ensure long term mitigation of the seep.

4.7 Continued Operation of the Sub-Slab Depressurization System

Operation of the SSD system will continue through 2011 at the Paragon Site. The system will continue to operate utilizing the two laterals as the extraction points, with the vertical points used to monitor the performance of the system. No modifications to the current operational procedures are planned for the SSD system.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property - 22 - January 31, 2011

4.8 Continued Operation of the TFR System

Operation of the TFR system will continue through 2011 at the Paragon and Apollo Street Sites with the primary objective of maintaining the reversed gradients for continued mitigation of the seep. The system will continue to operate with the existing 13 TFR wells. Treated effluent will continue to be discharged to the combined sewer system and will be monitored to ensure compliance with applicable NYCDEP water quantity and quality permit requirements.

4.9 Development of Alternative Analysis Reports

During 2011 remedial options assessments will be completed for site wide corrective action related to groundwater, PSH, soil and soil vapor. The assessment results and the selected remedies will be submitted to the NYSDEC as Alternative Analysis Reports.

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property January 31, 2011

Figures

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property January 31, 2011

Tables

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property January 31, 2011

Appendices

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC 2010 Annual Progress Report and 4th Quarterly Status Report Former Paragon Oil Terminal #304209 & Apollo St. property January 31, 2011

Plates

SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC Site Location

Y

NOTE: BASE MAP OF THE USGS BROOKLYN 7.5 MIN QUADRANGLE.

01,000 2,000 4,000

Feet FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209 GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY Site Location Map drawn checked approved AGM JAK PJC figure no. date 1/15/08 date 2/11/08date 2/11/08 job no. file no. 1 01-1633-00-5443-020 Site_Location_20110121.mxd ³ initials date revision S £ 2 Figure No. Figure " ´ MW-68R PJC 7/29/2010 " ´ TS_20110121.mxd CMW-58 " ´ MW-69 approved file no. file date " ´ " ´ MW-70R JAK 7/29/2010 Recovery Well Well Monitoring MW-62 CMW-53R revision " ´ Feet

Recovery System Recovery

checked date

E

U GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY

N Fluids Total of Location " " ´ ´

TEXACO FACILITY #304209 FACILITY TEXACO 50 E date

CMW-59R

CMW-15 V

A

" ´ 46010AT106

R AGM " ´

TRANSFER PUMP CONTAINMENT BOX CONTAINMENT PUMP TRANSFER 1/19/2010

E TERMINAL PARAGON OIL FORMER Legend

BACKWASH TANK BACKWASH K initials Treatment System Layout System Treatment

PSH TANK E

0100200 E no.job drawn " ´ date M CMW-63R MW-63 CONCRETE PAD " ´ MW-72 " ´ PRE OIL WATER SEPARATOR TANK SEPARATOR WATER OIL PRE CMW-1 " ´ UNTREATED WATER TANK WATER UNTREATED MW-75R MW-60 PW-2R " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ OIL WATER SEPARATOR BUILDING SEPARATOR WATER OIL COMPRESSOR SHED CMW-2 " ´ CMW-23 S/D CMW-23 CMW-55 " ´ CMW-14 " ´ CMW-56 " ´ CMW-54 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ PW-1R MW-73R MW-64 " ´ MW-74R MW-61 " ´ " ´ BUILDING CMW-64R " ´ CMW-29 S/D CMW-29 WATER TREATMENT TREATMENT WATER CMW-13 Feet " ´ " ´ CMW-39 15 " ´ CMW-43R CMW-17R CMW-27 03060 " ´ " ´ MW-2 " ´ CMW-25 S/D CMW-25 " ´ CMW-28 " ´ " ´ CMW-4 " ´ CMW-26 CMW-5 " ´ MW-67 " ´ CMW-57 MW-66 CMW-33 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ CMW-32 MW-69 CMW-6 " ´ CMW-30 " ´ MW-68R " ´ " ´ MW-70R " ´ CMW-58 " ´ CMW-8 " ´ MW-76 CMW-53R " ´ " ´ CMW-9 CMW-47 S/D CMW-47 CMW-59R CMW-31 " " ´ ´ " ´ CMW-63R " ´ MW-77 " ´ CMW-60 S/D CMW-60 " ´ CMW-10 MW-72 PW-2R " ´ " ´ CMW-46 MW-75R " ´ " " ´ ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ CMW-61 " ´ STREET CMW-55 VARICK CMW-23 S/D CMW-23 MW-78 CMW-34 S/D CMW-34 " ´ " ´ CMW-54 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ MW-73R CMW-24 S/D CMW-24 MW-59 " ´

PW-1R T

CMW-56 E MW-74R " ´

CMW-43R E R " ´ T S

CMW-64R " ´

CMW-17R R CMW-12

CMW-62 S/D CMW-62 E " ´ CMW-39

MW-58 T " ´ A " ´ " ´ W " ´ " ´ E

" G ´ D " ´ I CMW-42 " ´ R RIMW-01 CMW-38 B CMW-35 CMW-21 CMW-36 S/D CMW-36 " ´ CMW-37 " ´ CMW-16 CMW-45 RW-25 " ´ " ´ RIMW-02 " ´ T CMW-18 E CMW-22 TRE N DAM S " ´ A " ´ V CMW-41 S/D CMW-41 " ´ CMW-20 " ´ MW-26 " ´ MW-88D " ´ " ´ " ´ MW-56 MW-1 " ´ " ´ MW-88S

CMW-19 S/D CMW-19

" ´

T

E CMW-44

E

R

T " ´

S

CMW-40 O

L

L

O

P MW-32 A " ´ MW-57 " ´ Site View Site Regional View

EET System\TS_20100713.mxd NY\2010\Projects\Treatment Greenpoint, LLO STR FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

TOTAL FLUIDS RECOVERY SYSTEM PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

3 Figure 4 4th Quarter Recovered PSH & Maintenance Timeline October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York

50,000 250

45,000

40,000 200 Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)

Weekly Recovered PSH (gal)

35,000 Equipment Cleaning Event Upgrade Event

Carbon/Clay Change-Out ed (gallons) (gallons) rr

30, 000 150 dd

25,000

20,000 100 Weekly PSH Weekly Recovere Cumulative PSH Recove PSH Cumulative 15,000

10,000 Verox 8 biocide chemical 50 feed ceased 11/16/2010 12/1/2010 10/26/2010 SSD Carbon Change-out 5,000 Cycle Counter replaced on CMW-43R 12/7/2010 11/8/2010 0 0 10/1/2010 10/13/2010 10/25/2010 11/6/2010 11/18/2010 11/30/2010 12/12/2010 12/24/2010 Date Figure 5 Cumulative & Weekly PSH Recovered October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 GGitBklNYkreenpoint, Brooklyn, New York

45,000 1,500 42,268 gallons of PSH Recovered To Date 296 gallons of PSH Recovered in the Fourth Quarter of 2010 40,000

35,000 Cumulative Recovered PSH (gal)

Weekly Recovered PSH (gal) 30,000 1,000 (gallons) ed (gallons) r r d d 25,000 SH Recovere

e PSH Recove e PSH 20,000 P P vv Weekly Weekly

Cumulati 15,000 500

10,000

5,000

0 0 10/5/07 1/3/08 4/2/08 7/1/08 9/29/08 12/28/08 3/28/09 6/26/09 9/24/09 12/23/09 3/23/10 6/21/10 9/19/10 12/18/10 Date Note: Cumulative PSH Recovery includes 11,697 gallons recovered during interim recovery activities that occurred between July 2005 and September 2007. Weekly PSH values were calculated on a Sunday to Saturday week. Figure 6a 4th Quarter Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

4

3.5

3

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

1

0.5

0 10/1/2010 10/16/2010 10/31/2010 11/15/2010 11/30/2010 12/15/2010 12/30/2010 Date

CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-67 MW-69 MW-66 Figure 6b 4th Quarter Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

4

3.5

3

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

1

0.5

0 10/1/2010 10/16/2010 10/31/2010 11/15/2010 11/30/2010 12/15/2010 12/30/2010 Date

CMW-23S CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 MW-72 NEWTOWN CREEK

FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM

7 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

SUB SLAB DEPRESSION SYSTEM PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

PLAN VIEW OF BOOM CONTAINMENT AND ABSORPTION SYSTEM

KEY PLAN 9 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010

C1

10-4-2010 10-27-2010 11-3-2010 11-29-2010 12-7-2010 12-29-2010

C2

10-4-2010 10-27-2010 11-3-2010 11-29-2010 12-7-2010 12-29-2010

C3

10-4-2010 10-27-2010 11-3-2010 11-29-2010 12-7-2010 12-29-2010

C4

10-4-2010 10-27-2010 11-3-2010 11-29-2010 12-7-2010 12-29-2010

PARAGON SITE Boom Containment Figure The series of photographs for each boom containment system compartment show the water quality conditions through the Compartments 1 to 4 fourth quarter of 2010. These compartments are inspected and photographed twice daily, at least four times per week. Paragon Site 10 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

October 2010 November 2010 December 2010

10-4-2010 11-3-2010 12-7-2010 C5

10-27-2010 11-29-2010 12-29-2010

APOLLO SITE Boom Containment This photo compilation depicts boom compartment C5 fronting the Apollo Street site timber crib bulkhead in Newtown Figure Compartment 5 Creek. The series of photographs this compartment show the water quality conditions through the fourth quarter of 2010. Apollo Street Site This compartments is inspected and photographed twice daily, at least four times per week. Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 11

October 2010 November 2010 December 2010

SE1

10-21-2010 12-2-2010 12-22-2010

SE2

10-21-2010 12-2-2010 9-9-2010

SE3

10-21-2010 12-2-2010 9-9-2010

APOLLO STREET SITE Boom Containment This photo compilation depicts boom compartments SE1 to SE3 fronting the Apollo Street site relieving platform bulk- Compartments SE1 to SE3 Figure head along Newtown Creek. This compilation depicts typical water quality conditions within SE1 to SE3. Apollo Street Site Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY 12

Figure 13a Annual Lower Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

4

3.5

3

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

1

0.5

0 1/1/2010 4/1/2010 6/30/2010 9/28/2010 12/27/2010 Date

CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-67 MW-69 MW-66 Figure 13b Annual Upper Bulkhead Monitoring Wells PSH Thickness vs. Time January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

4

3.5

3

2.5 ss (ft.) ss e e 2

PSH Thickn 1.5

1

0.5

0 1/1/2010 4/1/2010 6/30/2010 9/28/2010 12/27/2010 Date

CMW-23S CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 MW-72 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209 INTERPRETED CAPTURE ZONE PUMPING AT HIGH TIDE SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 AT 08:20

14 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209

INTERPRETED CAPTURE ZONE PUMPING AT LOW TIDE SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 AT 14:35

15 Figure 16 Sheen Detections in the Boom Systems from 2008 to 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

100 Note: Sheen observations in Newtown Creek were not recorded until January 1, 2009. Newtown Creek 2008 Sheens in Newtown Creek are independent of the boom containment system located along the bulkhead of the Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street sites. C1 90 90 C2

85 85 2009 C3 83 C4

80 C5 (Apollo St Site) SE1 (Apollo St Site) SE2 (Apollo St Site) 70 70 SE3 (Apollo St Site) 66 2010 • 22 Sheens in 196 observations. • Sheen is absent 89% of the time. 60 • Sheen is absent 95% of the time in the 3rd & 4th Quarters. bservations O O 51 50

42

39

Number of Sheen 40

35

30

24 22

20 17

13 13 12 12 11 11 11 11 10 10 9 10 8 8 7 7 6 5 5 55 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 222222 1 1111 1 1 111 1 0 0000000000000000 0 000000000 0 000 0 0 0 1st Quarter 2008 2nd Quarter 2008 3rd Quarter 2008 4th Quarter 2008 1st Quarter 2009 2nd Quarter 2009 3rd Quarter 2009 4th Quarter 2009 1st Quarter 2010 2nd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2010 4th Quarter 2010 Quarter

Table 1 Summary of Total Fluids Recovered on a Weekly Basis September 14, 2007 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Cumulative Water Cumulative PSH Recovery Cumulative PSH Recovery Date Treated (gal) since 9/14/2007 (gal) since June 2005 (gal) Total Interim Recovery From June 2005 NA NA 11,697 to July 2007 9/14/2007 to 9/30/2010 21,609,575 30,275 41,972 10/2/2010 21,686,625 30,281 41,978 10/9/2010 21,961,629 30,311 42,008 10/16/2010 22,228,308 30,347 42,044 10/23/2010 22,473,025 30,371 42,068 10/30/2010 22,689,351 30,397 42,094 11/6/2010 22,890,094 30,423 42,120 11/13/2010 23,148,125 30,453 42,150 11/20/2010 23,367,925 30,479 42,176 11/27/2010 23,497,511 30,488 42,185 12/4/2010 23,649,275 30,508 42,205 12/11/2010 23,862,475 30,528 42,225 12/18/2010 24,071,686 30,543 42,240 12/25/2010 24,277,058 30,558 42,255 12/31/2010 24,425,875 30,571 42,268 Total Recovery in 2,816,300 296 NA 4th Quarter of 2010 Total Recovery with Current System 24,425,875 30,571 NA 9/14/2007 to 12/31/2010

Total PSH Recovery From June 2005 to December 31, 2010 42,268

Notes: NA = Not Applicable Table 2 4th Quarter Total Fluids Recovery System Operation October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Percent Uptime Well ID Well Notes October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 CMW-17R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 CMW-43R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; changed cycle counter on 11/8; pulled & inspected pump 12/13 CMW-53R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled, inspected pump, and changed anode on 12/13 CMW-59R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 CMW-63R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 CMW-64R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 MW-68R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 MW-70R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled, inspected pump, and changed anode on 12/13 MW-73R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 MW-74R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 MW-75R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 PW-1R (Phase 1) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled, inspected pump, and changed anode on 12/13 PW-2R (Phase 2) 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% Pulled & cleaned pump on 11/1; pulled & inspected pump on 12/13 Total Monthly 99.6% 94.8% 98.4% System Uptime

Notes: 1. "Percent Uptime" is a measurement of the amount of time a recovery pump operated in the given period. On occasion, individual pumps may be shut down for maintenance or repairs. 100% uptime is determined as continuous operation for 24 hours per day for the entire month. 2. "Total Monthly System Uptime" is the runtime of the recovery system during the given period. This runtime does not require every pump to be operating. 100% uptime is determined as continuous operation for 24 hours per day for the entire month. Table 3 4th Quarter Summary of Individual Well Flow-Rates October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Sum of CMW-17R CMW-43R CMW-53R CMW-59R CMW-63R CMW-64R MW-68R MW-70R MW-73R MW-74R MW-75R PW-1R PW-2R Individual Time Frame Wells September 29, 2010 to 3.52 5.24 3.64 4.10 4.44 1.87 1.69 3.25 0.94 0.84 4.33 1.85 1.78 37.47 October 5, 2010 October 5, 2010 to 3.09 5.85 3.63 3.69 5.08 1.58 1.38 2.93 1.18 0.78 0.96 1.66 1.74 33.56 October 11, 2010 October 11, 2010 to 3.56 6.12 3.70 3.65 5.06 1.93 1.22 2.53 0.71 0.72 1.65 1.65 1.84 34.34 October 19, 2010 October 19, 2010 to 3.05 0.03 3.91 2.87 5.32 1.94 1.00 1.81 0.50 0.59 1.03 1.41 1.54 24.99 October 25, 2010 October 25, 2010 to 3.20 6.47 3.89 3.33 5.19 2.14 1.10 1.99 0.45 0.60 2.24 1.34 1.44 33.39 November 3, 2010 November 3, 2010 to 4.29 7.48 4.12 3.28 4.80 1.95 1.39 3.00 1.28 0.64 0.31 1.52 1.47 35.52 November 9, 2010 November 9, 2010 to 6.60 3.75 3.32 4.00 5.01 1.95 1.58 3.56 4.62 0.70 0.86 1.94 1.55 39.45 November 15, 2010 November 15, 2010 to 3.12 3.02 1.94 1.23 2.44 1.62 1.12 2.72 2.93 0.57 1.26 0.79 1.01 23.78 November 30, 2010 November 30, 2010 to 1.95 2.66 3.12 0.32 3.20 1.46 1.06 2.33 2.94 0.55 0.30 1.01 1.41 22.31 December 7, 2010 December 7, 2010 to 2.35 3.67 4.36 0.24 4.51 1.93 1.11 2.31 4.15 0.58 0.35 0.03 1.30 26.87 December 13, 2010 December 13, 2010 to 2.29 3.48 4.07 0.20 3.88 1.91 1.15 2.95 4.55 0.66 0.39 1.17 1.53 28.25 December 21, 2010 Table 4 4th Quarter Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring Wells October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Monitoring Wells Date CMW-23D CMW-23S CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-66 MW-67 MW-69 MW-72 MW-76 MW-77 10/5/2010 ND ND 0.14 ND ND 0.13 1.47 ND 0.56 0.87 ND ND 0.97 10/11/2010 ND ND 0.39 ND ND 1.30 1.57 ND 1.40 2.04 ND ND 1.35 10/19/2010 ND ND 0.46 ND ND 0.80 1.31 ND 1.32 1.42 ND ND 1.47 10/25/2010 ND ND 0.45 ND ND 1.24 1.29 ND 1.24 1.52 ND ND 1.56 11/3/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.20 0.26 ND 0.53 0.85 ND ND 1.75 11/9/2010 ND ND 0.09 ND ND 0.83 1.39 ND 1.37 1.59 ND ND 1.28 11/15/2010 ND ND Trace ND ND 1.13 1.88 ND 0.69 NM ND ND 2.00 11/30/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.42 1.43 ND 0.75 NM ND ND 2.97 12/7/2010 ND ND Trace ND ND 0.46 1.38 ND 0.98 0.85 ND ND 3.53 12/13/2010 ND ND 0.10 ND ND 1.26 1.65 ND 0.55 0.89 ND ND 2.52 12/21/2010 ND ND 0.33 ND ND 0.75 NM ND 0.86 0.96 ND ND 3.26

Notes: 1) Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement. 2) ND Indicates PSH was not detected. 3) NM Indicates a well was not measured. Table 5 4th Quarter Measured PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Recovery Wells October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Phase I Recovery Wells Phase II Recovery Wells Date MW-68R MW-70R MW-73R MW-74R MW-75R PW-1R CMW-17R CMW-43R CMW-53R CMW-59R CMW-63R CMW-64R PW-2R 10/5/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 ND 10/11/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.50 ND 10/19/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.81 ND 10/25/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.57 1.27 ND 11/3/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.02 ND 11/9/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11/15/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.33 ND ND 11/30/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.24 ND 12/7/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.22 ND 12/13/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.84 ND 12/21/2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.49 ND

Notes: 1) Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement. 2) ND Indicates PSH was not detected. 3) NM Indicates a well was not measured. Table 6 4th Quarter NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYCDEP TS-4 Post GAC 2: Analyte Daily Monthly Treated Effluent Limit Limit (12/7/2010) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L) < 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (ug/L) < 9.4 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L) < 5.0 Aroclor 1016 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1221 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1232 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1242 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1248 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1254 (ug/L) < 0.057 Aroclor 1260 (ug/L) < 0.057 Benzene (ug/L) 134 57 < 5.0 Cadmium - Total (mg/L) 2 0.001 Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/L) < 5.0 Carbonaceous Biochemical 2.4 Oxygen Demand (mg/L) Chloride (mg/L) 10,600 Chloroform (ug/L) < 5.0 Copper - Total (mg/L) 5 0.0094 Ethylbenzene (ug/L) 380 142 < 5.0 Flashpoint (°F) >140 > 176.0 Hexavalent Chromium - 5 < 0.01 Total (mg/L) Lead - Total (mg/L) 2 0.009 Mercury - Total (mg/L) 0.05 < 0.0002 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (ug/L) 50 < 5.0 Naphthalene (ug/L) 47 19 < 4.7 Nickel - Total (mg/L) 3 0.0098 Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/L-N) < 0.05 pH, Field (S.U.) 5-12 6.61 Phenol (ug/L) < 4.7 SGT Total Petroleum 50 < 5.0 Hydrocarbons (mg/L) Temperature, Field (°C) <150 12.6 Tetrachloroethene (ug/L) 20 < 5.0 Toluene (ug/L) 74 28 < 5.0 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L-N) 1.46 Total Residue, at 103°C (mg/L) 20,900 Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 350 < 4.0 Total Xylenes (ug/L) 74 28 < 10 Zinc - Total (mg/L) 5 0.0901 Table 7 4th Quarter Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Time Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/6/2010 8:10 70 84 <4.0 7.4 160 TS-2 Post OC 10/6/2010 8:15 67 76 <4.0 7.4 150 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/6/2010 8:20 64 42 <4.0 5.5 72 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/6/2010 8:25 38 11 1.2 1.9 17 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/13/2010 9:00 45 61 <1.0 5.8 130 TS-2 Post OC 10/13/2010 9:05 47 57 <1.0 5.9 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/13/2010 9:10 44 31 <1.0 4.1 54 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/13/2010 9:15 32 10 0.8 1.8 15 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/20/2010 9:05 38 66 <1.6 5.7 130 TS-2 Post OC 10/20/2010 9:10 39 50 <0.16 5.1 94 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/20/2010 9:15 38 33 <0.16 3.9 55 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/20/2010 9:20 28 9.6 <0.16 1.6 14 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/27/2010 10:45 53 110 <1.6 10 260 TS-2 Post OC 10/27/2010 10:50 52 96 1.1 9 220 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/27/2010 10:55 54 53 1.1 6.8 100 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/27/2010 11:00 41 16 1.1 3 26 TS-1 Untreated Influent 11/4/2010 10:45 38 55 <0.32 4.6 120 TS-2 Post OC 11/4/2010 10:40 39 48 0.96 4.6 100 TS-3 Post GAC 1 11/4/2010 10:35 48 42 1.1 5.5 73 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 11/4/2010 10:30 38 15 1.1 2.6 22 New York City Effleunt Standards, applicable to TS-4 only 134 380 50 74 74

Note: Compliance with NYCDEP discharge criteria is specific to the treated effluent only (TS-4). Table 8 4th Quarter Summary of Sub-Slab Depressurization System Monitoring Results Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date

Type of Location Units 10/4/10 10/6/10 10/13/10 10/19/10 10/21/10 10/26/10 10/27/10 11/1/10 11/3/10 11/9/10 11/11/10 11/16/10 11/18/10 11/29/10 12/2/10 12/6/10 12/8/10 12/13/10 12/15/10 12/20/10 12/23/10 12/29/10 12/30/10 1/4/11 Reading

H-1 "WC5 555555555555555 55 5 Active Vacuum H-3 "WC 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5

Manifold Flow Rate CFM 5.6 4.5 5 4.6 8.4 8.1 6.9 7 5 4.4 3.6 5.7 4.4 6 6.5 13.9 17.5 16.2 16.5 12

E-1 "WC 0.11 0.1 0.05 0.055 0.055 0.04 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.13 0.135 0.1 0.04 0.13

E-2 "WC 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.06 2.5

E-3 "WC 0.145 0.1 0.09 0.065 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.045 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.135 0.14 0.1 0.05 0.13

E-4 Induced "WC 0.11 0.065 0.055 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.045 0.025 0.04 0.035 0.025 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.075 0.06 0.051 0.065 Subsurface E-5 Vacuum "WC 0.205 0.175 0.16 0.155 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.095 0.1 0.125 0.11 0.11 0.115 0.14 0.185 0.16 0.05 0.185

E-6 "WC 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00 0.25 - 1.00

E-7 "WC 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.035 0.02 0.015 0.035 0.04 0.04 0.045 0.085 0.1 0.06 0.05 0.1

H-2 "WC 0.105 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.045 0.04 0.04 0.025 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.025 0.055 0.065 0.05 0.01 0.07

Post GAC 2 Methane % NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.089

PID Post GAC 2 ppm00 00.200.300000.1000000000000 Reading

Note 1. NA - Not Applicable 2. Post GAC 2 location is the final treated sicharge to the atmosphere 3. Methane discharge limit is 1% Table 9 4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities, Paragon Site October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 Component Name Type Location Date Installed Activity & Frequency Condition Activity & Frequency Condition Activity & Frequency Condition

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 1 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 2 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 3 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 4 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Hard Boom Globe Boom (Primary Parallel to Bulkhead July 2005 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (C1-C4) Containment) Hard Boom Fence Boom (Secondary Outermost Component May 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Containment)

Notes: 1 - Solidifier booms replaced the absorbent booms in C1, C2, C3, and C4 on March 2, 2010 and do not need to be changed out monthly in order to continue functioning. 2 - 5 sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 5 sheens on Newtown Creek were observed during the fourth quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows: • October 2010 - 4 (10/5/2010, 10/6/2010, 10/11/2010, 10/26/2010) • November 2010 - 1 (11/3/2010) • December 2010 - 0 Table 10 4th Quarter Newtown Creek Containment Boom System Activities, Apollo Street Site October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 Component Name Type Location Date Installed Activity & Frequency Condition Activity & Frequency Condition Activity & Frequency Condition

Changeout - None Sheen was observed once Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment 5 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (16 total observations) Inspection - Daily (18 total observations)

Globe Boom Hard Boom (Primary Parallel to Bulkhead July 2005 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (For C5) Containment)

Hard Boom Fence Boom (Secondary Outermost Component May 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Containment) Add'l Boom Installation - Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed (4 Compartment SE1 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 April 27, 2010 (8 total observations) Inspection - Daily (6 total observations) Inspection - Daily total observations) Inspection - Daily

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment SE2 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (6 total observations) Inspection - Daily (5 total observations) Inspection - Daily (4 total observations)

Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Changeout - None Sheen was not observed Compartment SE3 Solidifier Boom Inside Globe Boom March 2, 2010 Inspection - Daily (5 total observations) Inspection - Daily (5 total observations) Inspection - Daily (4 total observations)

Globe Boom Hard Boom (Primary Parallel to bulkhead 2006 Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional Inspection - Daily Functional (For SE1-SE3) Containment)

Notes: 1 - Texaco never owned or operated on the 100-120 Apollo Street Property. 2 - Solidifier booms replaced the absorbent booms in C5, SE1, SE2, and SE3 on March 2, 2010 and do not need to be changed out monthly in order to continue functioning. 3 - 5 sheens not associated with the Paragon and Apollo Street sites have been present on Newtown Creek beyond the fence boom and of unknown origin. A total of 5 sheens were observed in Newtown Creek during the fourth quarter, with monthly occurrences as follows: • October 2010 - 4 (10/5/2010, 10/6/2010, 10/11/2010, 10/26/2010) • November 2010 - 1 (11/3/2010) • December 2010 - 0 4 - The only sheen observed in the Apollo Street site containment system was 1 sheen in C5 Table 11 Annual Summary of Total Fluids Recovered January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Month Groundwater Treated (gal) PSH Recovered (gal)

January 558,175 433 February 736,850 545 March 837,875 385 April 784,800 235 May 939,675 342 June 948,300 376 July 883,800 299 August 1,000,800 252 September 1,100,400 99 October 1,100,369 126 November 865,731 92 December 850,200 78

Total Recovery in 2010 10,606,975 3,262

Total Recovery with Current System 24,425,875 30,571 9/14/2007 to 12/31/2010 Total Interim Recovery From June 2005 NA 11,697 to July 2007

Total PSH Recovery From June 2005 to 12/31/2010 42,268

Notes: 1. NA = Not Applicable Table 12 Annual PSH Thicknesses in Bulkhead Monitoring and Recovery Wells Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Monitoring Wells Phase I Recovery Wells Phase II Recovery Wells Date CMW-23S CMW-23D CMW-54 CMW-55 CMW-56 CMW-57 CMW-58 MW-66 MW-67 MW-69 MW-72 MW-76 MW-77 MW-68R MW-70R MW-73R MW-74R MW-75R PW-1R CMW-17R CMW-43R CMW-53R CMW-59R CMW-63R CMW-64R PW-2R 1/6/2010 ND ND 0.06 ND ND NM 1.93 ND 0.82 2.00 ND ND 1.78 ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 ND ND ND 0.04 ND ND ND 1/14/2010 ND ND 0.60 ND ND NM 1.35 ND 1.25 1.28 ND NM NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.03 0.03 ND ND 1/21/2010 ND ND 1.26 ND ND 0.49 1.06 ND 0.90 1.72 ND 0.01 1.91 ND ND ND ND 0.12 ND ND ND ND 0.05 ND 0.12 ND 1/26/2010 ND ND 1.15 ND ND 0.31 1.95 ND 0.65 0.92 ND ND 1.78 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.15 0.75 ND 2/2/2010 ND ND 0.65 ND ND NM 1.80 ND 1.04 1.95 ND 0.01 1.70 ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.51 ND 2/9/2010 ND ND 1.05 ND ND 0.90 1.94 ND 1.11 2.03 ND ND 0.80 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 1.85 ND 2/17/2010 ND ND 0.97 ND ND 0.93 1.84 ND 1.10 1.60 ND 0.01 1.67 ND ND ND ND ND 0.03 ND ND 0.04 ND 0.28 0.71 ND 2/23/2010 ND ND 0.51 ND ND 0.61 2.34 ND 0.32 0.81 ND 0.01 1.78 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.88 ND 3/8/2010 ND ND 0.87 ND ND 0.91 2.05 ND 1.07 1.35 ND ND 0.31 ND ND ND ND ND NM ND ND NM ND ND 0.43 ND 3/12/2010 ND ND 0.61 ND ND 1.14 1.76 ND 1.30 1.17 ND ND 1.41 ND ND ND ND ND NM ND ND ND ND ND NM ND 3/16/2010 ND ND 0.24 ND ND 0.99 2.54 ND 0.80 0.87 ND ND 1.14 ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND NM ND 3/31/2010 ND ND NM NM NM 0.87 3.06 ND 0.97 1.19 ND NM NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.10 ND 4/7/2010 ND ND 0.75 ND ND 1.12 1.85 ND 1.00 1.32 ND NM NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.90 ND 4/14/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.10 1.19 ND 0.67 0.73 ND NM NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.31 ND 4/20/2010 ND ND 1.16 ND ND 1.24 2.01 ND 1.30 2.41 ND ND 1.11 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.30 ND 4/28/2010 ND ND 0.85 ND ND 0.94 2.67 ND 0.84 1.18 ND ND 1.11 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.45 ND 5/5/2010 ND ND 0.99 ND ND 1.22 2.24 ND 1.40 2.30 ND ND 1.22 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.00 ND 5/13/2010 ND ND NM ND ND 0.03 NM ND 0.61 NM ND NM NM ND NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.97 ND 5/19/2010 ND ND 0.35 ND ND 0.75 2.64 ND 0.79 1.33 ND ND 1.13 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 1.69 ND 5/27/2010 ND ND 0.42 ND ND 1.11 2.56 ND 1.08 1.65 ND ND 0.18 ND ND ND ND 0.05 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.77 ND 6/2/2010 ND ND 0.91 ND ND 1.16 1.85 ND 1.00 1.50 ND ND 1.17 ND ND NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.61 ND 6/9/2010 ND ND 0.48 ND ND 1.15 0.90 ND 1.18 2.28 ND ND 1.32 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 2.25 ND 6/14/2010 ND ND 0.68 ND ND 1.31 1.54 ND 1.12 0.86 ND ND 1.40 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.70 ND 6/21/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.95 0.70 ND 0.67 0.44 ND ND 1.15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 ND 7/1/2010 ND ND 0.16 ND ND 1.18 1.12 ND 0.85 1.28 ND ND 0.85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 0.51 ND 7/8/2010 ND ND 0.08 ND ND 1.09 0.98 ND 1.12 1.04 ND ND 0.76 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.99 ND 7/13/2010 ND ND 0.51 ND ND 1.23 1.41 ND 1.11 1.39 ND ND 0.76 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 7/19/2010 ND ND 0.76 ND ND 1.44 1.06 ND 1.35 1.23 ND ND 0.93 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.88 ND 7/28/2010 ND ND 0.06 ND ND 1.04 1.02 ND 1.23 0.96 ND ND 1.19 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.64 ND 8/3/2010 ND ND 0.57 ND ND 1.45 0.97 ND 1.50 2.03 ND ND NM ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.47 ND 8/10/2010 ND ND 0.62 ND ND 1.31 1.16 ND 1.12 1.50 ND ND 1.62 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.68 ND 8/19/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.38 1.13 ND 1.43 2.08 ND ND 1.53 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.60 0.04 8/24/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.74 0.45 ND 0.59 0.30 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 ND 8/30/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.18 1.62 ND 1.30 1.42 ND ND 1.41 ND ND ND ND 0.06 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.43 ND 9/8/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.97 3.40 ND 0.47 0.61 ND ND 1.09 0.01 ND ND ND 0.11 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.69 ND 9/14/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.13 1.70 ND 1.15 2.12 ND ND 1.45 ND ND ND ND 0.20 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 ND 9/21/2010 ND ND 0.04 ND ND 1.12 1.33 ND 0.99 0.76 ND ND 1.29 ND ND ND ND 0.18 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.61 ND 9/29/2010 ND ND 0.18 ND ND 0.94 0.43 ND 0.49 0.47 ND ND 1.35 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.76 ND 10/5/2010 ND ND 0.14 ND ND 0.13 1.47 ND 0.56 0.87 ND ND 0.97 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 ND 10/11/2010 ND ND 0.39 ND ND 1.30 1.57 ND 1.40 2.04 ND ND 1.35 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.50 ND 10/19/2010 ND ND 0.46 ND ND 0.80 1.31 ND 1.32 1.42 ND ND 1.47 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.81 ND 10/25/2010 ND ND 0.45 ND ND 1.24 1.29 ND 1.24 1.52 ND ND 1.56 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.57 1.27 ND 11/3/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 1.20 0.26 ND 0.53 0.85 ND ND 1.75 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 0.02 ND 11/9/2010 ND ND 0.09 ND ND 0.83 1.39 ND 1.37 1.59 ND ND 1.28 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11/15/2010 ND ND Trace ND ND 1.13 1.88 ND 0.69 NM ND ND 2.00 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.33 ND ND 11/30/2010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.42 1.43 ND 0.75 NM ND ND 2.97 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.24 ND 12/7/2010 ND ND Trace ND ND 0.46 1.38 ND 0.98 0.85 ND ND 3.53 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.22 ND 12/13/2010 ND ND 0.10 ND ND 1.26 1.65 ND 0.55 0.89 ND ND 2.52 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.84 ND 12/21/2010 ND ND 0.33 ND ND 0.75 NM ND 0.86 0.96 ND ND 3.26 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.49 ND

Notes: 1. Recovery wells were operating at the time of measurement. 2. ND Indicates PSH was not detected at time of measurement. 3. NM Indicates a well was not measured. Table 13 Annual Summary of Fluids Removed from System during Equipment Cleaning January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Total Fluids Recovered Calculated Volume of Calculated Volume of Date of Cleaning Event (gallons) Water* (gallons) PSH* (gallons) 1/12/2010 2,555 2,453 77 1/25/2010 2,776 2,693 83 2/8/2010 2,737 2,682 55 3/2/2010 2,663 2,556 80 3/9/2010 2,379 2,284 71 4/12/2010 2,651 2,545 80 4/13/2010 2,074 2,053 21 4/27/2010 2,617 2,565 26 5/11/2010 2,552 2,450 77 5/25/2010 2,435 2,386 29 5/26/2010 1,669 1,636 25 6/16/2010 2,867 2,810 52 6/30/2010 2,982 2,922 30 7/14/2010 3,028 2,907 121 7/28/2010 2,817 2,704 110 8/18/2010 2,672 2,619 53 8/23/2010 2,841 2,756 57 9/20/2010 2,752 2,669 83 10/26/2010 2,653 2,573 80 12/7/2010 3,095 3,002 93 Total Recovery 52,815 51,265 1,301 in 2010

Notes: 1. Calculated volumes of recovered water and PSH are based on estimated percentages provided by the recycling facility. 2. The volumes recorded in this table are included in the total volumes recovered as presented in tables 1 and 11 of this report. Table 14 Annual Summary of NYCDEP Discharge Permit Compliance Results Janaury 1, 2010 Through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility # 304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYCDEP TS-4 Post GAC 2: TS-4 Post GAC 2: TS-4 Post GAC 2: TS-4 Post GAC 2: Analyte Daily Monthly Treated Effluent Treated Effluent Treated Effluent Treated Effluent Limit Limit (1/6/2010) (4/28/2010) (7/15/2010) (12/7/2010) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L) <5 <5 <5 <5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (ug/L) <9.4 <47 <9.6 <9.4 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L) <5 <5 <5 <5 Aroclor 1016 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1221 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1232 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1242 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1248 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1254 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Aroclor 1260 (ug/L) <0.057 <0.057 <0.058 <0.057 Benzene (ug/L) 134 57 <5 7 <5 <5 Cadmium - Total (mg/L) 2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 Carbon Tetrachloride (ug/L) <5 <5 <5 <5 Carbonaceous Biochemical 15.1 32.4 14 2.4 Oxygen Demand (mg/L) Chloride (mg/L) 10700 11300 11800 10600 Chloroform (ug/L) <5 <5 <5 <5 Copper - Total (mg/L) 5 <0.01 <0.01 0.0021J 0.0094J Ethylbenzene (ug/L) 380 142 <5 3.2J <5 <5 Flashpoint (°F) >140 176 176 >176 >176 Hexavalent Chromium - 5 0.0077J <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Total (mg/L) Lead - Total (mg/L) 2 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 0.009 Mercury - Total (mg/L) 0.05 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (ug/L) 50 <5 0.99J <5 <5 Naphthalene (ug/L) 47 19 <4.7 3.2J <4.8 <4.7 Nickel - Total (mg/L) 3 0.0014J 0.0044J <0.01 0.0098J Nitrate-Nitrite (mg/L-N) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 pH, Field (S.U.) 5-12 7.26 6.73 6.81 6.61 Phenol (ug/L) <4.7 <24 <4.8 <4.7 SGT Total Petroleum 50 <5 <5 2.9J <5 Hydrocarbons (mg/L) Temperature, Field (°C) <150 13.3 12.7 21.6 12.6 Tetrachloroethene (ug/L) 20 <5 <5 <5 <5 Toluene (ug/L) 74 28 <5 <5 <5 <5 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L-N) 2.65 1.6 1.69 1.46 Total Residue, at 103°C (mg/L) 17500 20200 23000 20900 Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 350 <4 <4 <4 <4 Total Xylenes (ug/L) 74 28 <10 6.2J <10 <10 Zinc - Total (mg/L) 5 0.0064J 0.0154 0.0076J 0.0901 Table 15 Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Time Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 1/6/2010 1:35 110 130 5 9.5 190 TS-2 Post OC 1/6/2010 1:40 120 140 5 11 220 TS-3 Post GAC 1 1/6/2010 1:45 9.9 9.3 1.5 0.53 14 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 1/6/2010 1:50 5 5 5 5 10 TS-1 Untreated Influent 1/14/2010 8:30 150 130 <2 13 150 TS-2 Post OC 1/14/2010 8:35 140 130 <2 12 150 TS-3 Post GAC 1 1/14/2010 8:40 20 10 2.1 1 12 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 1/14/2010 8:45 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 1/20/2010 8:50 170 150 <2 16 310 TS-2 Post OC 1/20/2010 8:55 160 140 <2 16 280 TS-3 Post GAC 1 1/20/2010 9:00 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 1/20/2010 9:05 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 1/27/2010 1:20 290 150 <4 23 240 TS-2 Post OC 1/27/2010 1:25 290 150 <4 23 240 TS-3 Post GAC 1 1/27/2010 1:30 47 23 <4 3.9J 37 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 1/27/2010 1:35 7.2 4.2 <1 <1 6.8 TS-1 Untreated Influent 3/4/2010 9:10 140 180 <8 16 310 TS-2 Post OC 3/4/2010 9:15 140 190 <8 17 320 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 3/4/2010 9:20 <1 0.97J <1 <1 1.6J TS-1 Untreated Influent 4/1/2010 14:55 93 350 <10 15 500 TS-2 Post OC 4/1/2010 15:00 87 260 <10 14 350 TS-3 Post GAC 1 4/1/2010 15:50 2.4 8.7 <1 <1 12 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 4/1/2010 15:10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 4/6/2010 9:50 140 270 <10 16 380 TS-2 Post OC 4/6/2010 9:55 130 240 <10 16 290 TS-3 Post GAC 1 4/6/2010 10:00 23 36 <1 2.2 41 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 4/6/2010 10:05 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 4/14/2010 10:40 1400 730 <20 150 1000 TS-2 Post OC 4/14/2010 10:45 1400 720 <20 140 990 TS-3 Post GAC 1 4/14/2010 10:50 51 11 <1 0.8J 16 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 4/14/2010 10:55 <1 <1 <1 <1 <3 TS-1 Untreated Influent 4/28/2010 14:30 160 140 <10 13 200 TS-2 Post OC 4/28/2010 14:35 140 140 <2 14 200 TS-3 Post GAC 1 4/28/2010 14:40 39 27 1.2 2.1 38 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 4/28/2010 14:45 2.9 1.5 0.67J <1 2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 5/6/2010 8:30 220 170 <4 25 240 TS-2 Post OC 5/6/2010 8:35 220 180 <2 25 240 TS-3 Post GAC 1 5/6/2010 8:40 120 75 <1 10 100 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 5/6/2010 8:45 20 12 <1 1.2 17 TS-1 Untreated Influent 5/13/2010 9:20 94 95 <2 11 130 TS-2 Post OC 5/13/2010 9:25 100 100 <2 13 140 TS-3 Post GAC 1 5/13/2010 9:30 86 47 <1 6.3 60 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 5/13/2010 9:35 23 7.2 <1 1.1 9.4 TS-1 Untreated Influent 5/19/2010 11:30 150 240 <10 23 380 TS-2 Post OC 5/19/2010 11:35 160 230 <10 23 370 TS-3 Post GAC 1 5/19/2010 11:40 120 120 <5 14 180 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 5/19/2010 11:45 54 42 <1 4.1 62 TS-1 Untreated Influent 5/27/2010 8:45 55 54 5 7.2 48 TS-2 Post OC 5/27/2010 8:50 56 59 5 7.4 54 TS-3 Post GAC 1 5/27/2010 8:55 31 5.8 2 1.9 6.2 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 5/27/2010 9:00 16 2 2 2 4 Table 15 Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Time Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 6/15/2010 9:30 170 200 <10 26 380 TS-2 Post OC 6/15/2010 9:25 110 94 <5 14 170 TS-3 Post GAC 1 6/15/2010 9:20 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 6/15/2010 9:15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/1/2010 11:25 70 71 <1 7.3 130 TS-2 Post OC 7/1/2010 11:30 61 44 <5 5.4 71 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/1/2010 11:35 7.4 1.8 <1 <1 2.4 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/1/2010 11:40 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/7/2010 8:15 70 56 <1 6.6 110 TS-2 Post OC 7/7/2010 8:20 70 44 1.6 5.7 85 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/7/2010 8:25 6.7 0.83J <1 <1 1J TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/7/2010 8:30 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/15/2010 12:50 99 85 <4 9.5 140 TS-2 Post OC 7/15/2010 12:55 100 69 <5 8.1 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/15/2010 13:00 15 3.8 1J <2 4.9 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/15/2010 13:05 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/22/2010 8:00 110 110 <10 13 200 TS-2 Post OC 7/22/2010 8:05 100 89 <10 10 160 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/22/2010 8:10 31 13 <1 1.7 21 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/22/2010 8:15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 7/29/2010 10:45 130 140 <10 15 270 TS-2 Post OC 7/29/2010 10:50 120 120 <10 14 220 TS-3 Post GAC 1 7/29/2010 10:55 41 16 1.4 2 27 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 7/29/2010 11:00 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/5/2010 10:40 140 220 <10 20 420 TS-2 Post OC 8/5/2010 10:45 130 250 <10 18 470 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/5/2010 10:50 70 38 <5 4.4J 68 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/5/2010 10:55 0.59J <1 <1 <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/11/2010 8:55 120 180 <10 19 390 TS-2 Post OC 8/11/2010 8:50 120 120 <10 15 260 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/11/2010 8:45 67 34 <2 5.1 66 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/11/2010 8:40 4.6 <1 0.72J <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/19/2010 8:45 65 95 <10 7.7J 190 TS-2 Post OC 8/19/2010 8:40 75 89 <10 8.4J 170 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/19/2010 8:35 62 21 1.4J 3.1 34 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/19/2010 8:30 16 1.3 1.2 <1 1.4J TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/25/2010 9:00 69 55 <10 6.2J 110 TS-2 Post OC 8/25/2010 9:05 72 51 <10 6.5J 99 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/25/2010 9:10 56 16 <2 3.1 26 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/25/2010 9:15 20 1.7 1.2 <1 1.8J TS-1 Untreated Influent 8/31/2010 1:55 21 24 0.63J 1.7 45 TS-2 Post OC 8/31/2010 1:50 28 26 0.7J 2.4 46 TS-3 Post GAC 1 8/31/2010 1:45 40 14 0.99J 2.2 21 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 8/31/2010 1:40 11 0.79J 0.95J <1 <2 TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/16/2010 2:00 30 39 1.1J 2.7J 77 TS-2 Post OC 9/16/2010 2:15 27 22 <1 2.1 44 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/16/2010 2:20 33 18 <1 2.2 31 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/16/2010 2:25 20 4.1J 1.1J <5 5.9J TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/21/2010 8:45 42 62 <1 5.3 150 TS-2 Post OC 9/21/2010 8:40 43 55 <1 5.3 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/21/2010 8:35 39 24 <1 3.2 43 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/21/2010 8:30 21 4.7 0.89J 0.86J 6.9 Table 15 Annual Summary of Internal Quality Assurance Discharge Results January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Street Property Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

Date Time Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl-t-Butyl Toluene Total Xylenes Location Sampled Sampled (ug/L) (ug/L) Ether (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) TS-1 Untreated Influent 9/29/2010 10:15 70 89 0.92J 8.3 210 TS-2 Post OC 9/29/2010 10:20 68 79 1 7.8 180 TS-3 Post GAC 1 9/29/2010 10:25 56 32 0.86J 4.3 60 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 9/29/2010 10:30 29 5.2 0.94J 1.2 7.9 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/6/2010 8:10 70 84 <4.0 7.4 160 TS-2 Post OC 10/6/2010 8:15 67 76 <4.0 7.4 150 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/6/2010 8:20 64 42 <4.0 5.5 72 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/6/2010 8:25 38 11 1.2 1.9 17 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/13/2010 9:00 45 61 <1.0 5.8 130 TS-2 Post OC 10/13/2010 9:05 47 57 <1.0 5.9 120 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/13/2010 9:10 44 31 <1.0 4.1 54 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/13/2010 9:15 32 10 0.8 1.8 15 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/20/2010 9:05 38 66 <1.6 5.7 130 TS-2 Post OC 10/20/2010 9:10 39 50 <0.16 5.1 94 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/20/2010 9:15 38 33 <0.16 3.9 55 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/20/2010 9:20 28 9.6 <0.16 1.6 14 TS-1 Untreated Influent 10/27/2010 10:45 53 110 <1.6 10 260 TS-2 Post OC 10/27/2010 10:50 52 96 1.1 9 220 TS-3 Post GAC 1 10/27/2010 10:55 54 53 1.1 6.8 100 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 10/27/2010 11:00 41 16 1.1 3 26 TS-1 Untreated Influent 11/4/2010 10:45 38 55 <0.32 4.6 120 TS-2 Post OC 11/4/2010 10:40 39 48 0.96 4.6 100 TS-3 Post GAC 1 11/4/2010 10:35 48 42 1.1 5.5 73 TS-4 Post GAC 2: Treated Effluent 11/4/2010 10:30 38 15 1.1 2.6 22 NYCDEP Permit Criteria, applicable to TS-4 only 134 380 50 74 74

Notes: 1. J indicates an estimated value. This data qualifier is used either when estimating a concentration for tentatively identified compounds where a 1:1 response is assumed, or when the data indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification 2. Indicates the values that must comply with NYCDEP permit. 3. Compliance with NYCDEP discharge criteria is specific to the treated effluent only (TS-4). Table 16 Ambient Air Sampling Results February 27-28, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Site Texaco Facility # 304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-3 OA-5 OA-8

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <2 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <9.6 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 2.7 <0.98 5.9 2.9 1.9 2.2 4.3 10 4.4 10 <0.98 6.9 8.4 3.9 <0.98 <0.98 0.98 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <3.8 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 0.97 <0.81 <0.81 <2 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,2-Dichloroethene,Total ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 1.6 <2.5 <0.98 <0.98 1.2 2.8 1.3 3.1 <0.98 1.9 2.3 1.1 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.9 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dioxane ug/m3 <18 <18 <18 <47 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/m3 2.8 0.93 2.3 <2.3 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.1 6.1 3.2 <0.93 2.8 3 2 <0.93 <0.93 1.6 2-Butanone ug/m3 2.8 <1.5 2.5 4.7 2.1 2 2.5 1.9 2.9 1.8 <1.5 2 2.2 2.3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 2-Chlorotoluene ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2-Hexanone ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 3-Chloropropene ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4.1 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 2.3 <2.5 <0.98 <0.98 1.6 4.2 1.9 4.9 <0.98 2.8 3.4 1.5 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Acetone ug/m3 20 <12 14 <31 14 13 13 <12 15 <12 <12 13 13 14 <12 <12 <12 Benzene ug/m3 2.4 1.4 3.8 2.6 2.2 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.5 4.8 1.3 4.2 4.5 2.7 1.1 1.3 1.8 Benzyl Chloride ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.4 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Bromoethene ug/m3 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <2.2 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 Bromoform ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <5.2 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Bromomethane ug/m3 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <1.9 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.1 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 Chloroethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.4 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chloroform ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Chloromethane ug/m3 1 1.3 <1 <2.7 <1 <1 1.2 1.1 1.1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.1 <1

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 1 of 2 Table 16 Ambient Air Sampling Results February 27-28, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal and Apollo Site Texaco Facility # 304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-3 OA-5 OA-8 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 Cumene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.5 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Cyclohexane ug/m3 25 5.9 22 14 11 11 18 21 59 55 4.8 45 48 20 0.76 1.7 1.7 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Ethylbenzene ug/m3 1.3 <0.87 1.4 <2.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.9 1.6 2.3 <0.87 1.7 2 1.3 <0.87 <0.87 0.96 Freon 11 ug/m3 1.6 1.3 2.6 <2.8 1.9 2 2.1 3 2.4 2.5 1.2 2.2 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.3 Freon 113 ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <3.8 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 Freon 114 ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.5 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 Freon 12 ug/m3 2.5 3.7 2.6 10 5.4 5.4 <2.5 <2.5 14 <2.5 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Freon 22 ug/m3 <1.8 1.9 <1.8 250 130 110 <1.8 1.9 11 8.8 <1.8 7.8 8.1 4.2 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <5.3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Isopropyl Alcohol ug/m3 14 <12 <12 54 39 34 <12 <12 14 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 m,p-Xylenes ug/m3 3.6 1.9 4.3 <4.3 3.6 3.7 4.1 6.1 4.8 6.9 <1.7 5.2 6.1 4.2 <1.7 1.9 3.1 Methane % <0.07 <0.075 <0.07 <0.076 <0.059 <0.07 <0.071 <0.074 <0.073 <0.074 <0.068 <0.059 <0.073 <0.073 <0.072 <0.07 <0.06 Methyl Methacrylate ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Methyl tert-butyl ether ug/m3 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <4.7 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 Methylene chloride 60 ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.5 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Naphthalene ug/m3 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <6.8 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 n-Butane ug/m3 18 17 21 20 14 15 18 20 78 38 14 33 38 48 7.1 21 76 n-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 n-Heptane ug/m3 6.1 1.3 6.1 5.3 4.1 4.5 4.9 6.1 9 9 1.1 7.8 8.2 4.5 <0.82 1.2 1.5 n-Hexane ug/m3 19 2.5 23 17 14 15 18 21 42 35 2.2 30 32 15 <1.8 2.2 3.9 n-Propylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 1.1 <2.5 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 2 0.98 2.3 <0.98 1.4 1.7 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 o-Xylene ug/m3 1.3 <0.87 2.2 <2.2 1.3 1.3 1.9 3.3 2.3 4 <0.87 2.6 3.2 1.8 <0.87 <0.87 1 p-Cymene ug/m3 1.3 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1.3 <1.1 1.6 <1.1 1.3 1.2 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 sec-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Styrene ug/m3 0.89 <0.85 <0.85 <2.1 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 tert-Butyl alcohol ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <39 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 Tert-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Tetrachloroethene 100 ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <38 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 Toluene ug/m3 13 4.1 9.8 12 10 10 11 9.4 6.8 7.5 3.5 6.8 7.2 6.8 3.4 3.8 6.4 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 Trichloroethene 5 ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <2.7 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Vinyl Chloride ug/m3 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <1.3 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 Xylenes, Total ug/m3 5.2 2 6.9 <2.2 4.8 5.2 6.1 9.6 7.4 11 <0.87 7.8 9.6 6.1 <0.87 2 4.2

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 2 of 2 Table 17 Summary of Ambient Air Monitoring August 21-22, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-1 OA-2 OA-3 OA-5 OA-6 OA-8

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.8 <3.1 <3.3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <2.3 <1.8 <1.9 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <10 <8.4 <8.9 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 2.4 2.3 3.6 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 4.5 2.2 4.2 2.9 <0.98 <0.98 2 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 1,2-Dibromoethane ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <4.3 <3.5 <3.7 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <2.3 <1.8 <1.9 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 <0.81 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.9 <3.2 <3.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 1.2 <0.98 1 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <1.2 <1 <1.1 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 <1.2 1.3 1.6 <3.4 <2.7 <2.9 1.2 1.3 <1.2 1.8 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1,4-Dioxane ug/m3 <18 <18 <18 <50 <41 <43 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 <18 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/m3 1.8 2.7 4.4 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 6 4.2 3 4.7 <0.93 <0.93 2.2 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 2-Chlorotoluene ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2-Hexanone ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 3-Chloropropene ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4.4 <3.5 <3.8 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 4-Isopropyltoluene ug/m3 <1.1 1.2 1.8 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 1.7 1.2 <1.1 1.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Acetone ug/m3 33 44 42 45 31 <29 36 34 44 44 15 16 31 27 12 19 <12 17 12 12 Benzene ug/m3 1 1.8 7.6 <1.8 <1.4 <1.5 2.6 12 7.1 7.3 0.76 0.69 2.9 0.68 <0.64 <0.64 <0.64 0.68 <0.64 <0.64 Benzyl chloride ug/m3 <1 <1 <1 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.8 <3 <3.2 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) ug/m3 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <2.4 <2 <2.1 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 Bromoform ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <5.8 <4.7 <5 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Bromomethane ug/m3 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 <0.78 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <4.4 <3.5 <3.7 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.5 <2.8 <3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <2.6 <2.1 <2.2 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 Chloroethane ug/m3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <3.7 <3 <3.2 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 Chloroform ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.7 <2.2 <2.3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Chloromethane ug/m3 1.3 1.3 1.4 <2.9 <2.3 <2.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 1 of 2 Table 17 Summary of Ambient Air Monitoring August 21-22, 2010 Former Paragon Oil Terminal Texaco Facility #304209 Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY

NYSDOH Indoor Location ID Outdoor Location ID Analyte Guideline Units 1 Values IA-1 IA-10 IA-15 IA-2 IA-3 IA-4 IA-5 IA-6 IA-7 IA-8 IA-9 IA-AP1 IA-AP2 IA-AP3 OA-1 OA-2 OA-3 OA-5 OA-6 OA-8

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.5 <2.1 <2.2 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 Cumene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 Cyclohexane ug/m3 10 7.7 65 2.5 3.1 2.5 13 39 51 70 7.4 5.6 19 3.1 <0.69 <0.69 <0.69 1.4 <0.69 <0.69 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.8 <3.9 <4.1 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 2.6 2.6 2.6 15 12 11 2.8 <2.5 15 2.7 9 8.9 2.8 2.7 <2.5 <2.5 2.8 <2.5 3 2.6 Ethanol ug/m3 1900E 3500E 3400E 1200E 1400E 1100E 4400E 4700E 1300E 3500E 110 120 2700E 930E 10 15 13 11 20 15 Ethylbenzene ug/m3 1.2 1.3 1.5 <2.4 <2 <2.1 2.6 1.3 1.5 1.3 <0.87 <0.87 0.93 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 Freon 22 ug/m3 4.5 8.8 4.2 360 300 270 20 3.5 4.2 5 4.6 4.8 4.4 2.4 3 2.4 1.8 2.1 <1.8 2.2 Freon TF ug/m3 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <4.3 <3.5 <3.7 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/m3 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <6 <4.8 <5.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Isopropyl alcohol ug/m3 14 16 20 110 130 120 21 19 17 23 <12 <12 22 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 <12 m,p-Xylene ug/m3 3.4 4 3.9 <6.1 <4.9 <5.2 8.7 3.4 4.3 3.4 <2.2 <2.2 2.6 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 Methane % <0.072 <0.072 <0.074 <0.056 <0.072 <0.072 <0.075 <0.056 <0.072 <0.074 <0.072 <0.07 <0.07 <0.076 <0.073 <0.074 <0.068 <0.053 <0.055 <0.081 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ug/m3 3.7 8.6 7 <4.1 3.3 <3.5 5.1 4.1 5.2 6.8 2.7 3.2 4.2 5.3 2 3.5 <1.5 1.8 2.6 2 methyl isobutyl ketone ug/m3 2.2 5.4 4.2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 5.1 4.5 <2 4.5 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Methyl methacrylate ug/m3 <2 <2 <2 <5.7 <4.6 <4.9 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Methyl tert-butyl ether ug/m3 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <2 <1.6 <1.7 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 Methylene Chloride 60 ug/m3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <4.9 <3.9 <4.2 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 1.8 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Naphthalene ug/m3 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <7.3 <5.9 <6.3 3.1 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 n-Butane ug/m3 7.6 8.6 27 4.4 5.5 4.4 14 29 38 28 1.6 1.5 11 3.2 1.2 1.5 <1.2 1.7 1.9 1.6 n-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 n-Heptane ug/m3 2.6 3.6 12 <2.3 2.9 2.6 4.8 15 8.5 12 1.1 1.1 4.5 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 n-Hexane ug/m3 8.7 10 48 3.6 4.1 3.6 16 59 34 49 2 1.8 19 2.6 0.73 0.78 <0.7 2.2 <0.7 <0.7 n-Propylbenzene ug/m3 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <2.8 <2.2 <2.4 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 <0.98 sec-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Styrene ug/m3 1.4 <0.85 1 <2.4 <1.9 <2 1 <0.85 <0.85 0.84 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 tert-Butyl alcohol ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <42 <34 <36 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 tert-Butylbenzene ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3.1 <2.5 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Tetrachloroethene 100 ug/m3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <3.8 <3.1 <3.3 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 <15 <15 <15 <41 <33 <35 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 Toluene ug/m3 11 7.9 7.9 6.7 8.2 7.5 15 6.5 6.1 7.1 2.9 2.2 5.5 1.3 2.4 2.4 1.7 1.6 1.6 2.3 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <2.2 <1.8 <1.9 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 <0.79 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <2.5 <2.1 <2.2 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 Trichloroethene 5 ug/m3 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <3 <2.4 <2.6 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 2.1 3.5 7.8 <3.1 <2.5 <2.7 4.1 23 4.4 9.6 1.5 1.5 7.5 3.7 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Vinyl chloride ug/m3 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <1.4 <1.2 <1.2 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 Xylene (total) ug/m3 4.6 5.5 5.3 3.6 5.2 4.9 12 4.5 5.7 4.7 1.8 1.7 3.5 <0.87 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 Xylene, o- ug/m3 1.2 1.5 1.5 <2.4 <2 <2.1 3 1.2 1.4 1.3 <0.87 <0.87 0.96 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87

Note: 1 - Air guideline values derived by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in the Final NYSDOH CEH BEEI Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance document, dated October 2006. Page 2 of 2 ³ 1 plate no. PJC 1/21/2011 Plate_5_Nov_2010_GW9_3-2 approved file no. date JAK SCALE IN FEET Apollo Street Site ParagonFormer Oil CurrentlyTerminal BP 1/19/2011 Former ExxonMobilFormer Properties Not Gauged (CMW) Texaco (CMW)Monitoring Texaco Well Well Mobil Monitoring Exxon Well Recovery Texaco PW-R) (CMW-R,MW-R, ExxonMobil Recovery Well (RW) Newtown(NC) Creek Gauging Location revision Groundwater Contour (Feet AMSL) (Feet Contour Groundwater AMSL) (Feet Contour Groundwater Inferred AMSL) (Feet Contour Groundwater and Identifier Groundwater Elevation Well AMSL) (Feet Interpreted Groundwater Flow Direction Interpreted 150 Ï " ´ " " " " ´ ´ ´ ´ X X checked date CMW-1 3.36 Legend GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2010 NOVEMBER TEXACO FACILITY #304209 date 1/19/2011 0 300 600 NOTE: by conducted surveys from obtained wells CMW of location The 1.) All non-CMW Borbas well locations Surveying Texaco. for provided by ExxonMobil or BP. 2.) Well identifiers are included on maps only if data for well is available. among was coordinated event gauging regional This 3.) personnel ExxonMobil, to and gaugeTexaco BP tidally influenced wells within an hour of the projected low tide at approximatelyAM. 10:23 4.) Within the tidally influenced zone on the Former Parargon at approximately at gauged were wells the sites, Apollo and (~10:23am) Tide Low 46010AT106 CSL 1/19/2011 FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL FORMER PARAGON JEB initials

GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP

job no.job drawn date

Y

A

W

S

S

E

R

P

X

E

S

N

E

E

U

Q

-

N

Y

L

K

O

O

R B 3' 2' " ´ MW-4 3.01 " 1' ´ MW-116 1.14 " ´ MW-115 1.02 0' " ´ MW-23 0.80 " ´ MW-112 1.73 MW-117 0.07 " ´ " ´ MW-22 0.21 " ´ MW-24 0.38 NC-2 0.21 " ´ -1' Ï " ´ X X " ´ MW-118 1.74 " ´ NC-2 1.92 MW-107 1.79 " ´ MW-25 -1.44 -2' MW-119 -0.95 NUE

MW-3 -1.37 E -3'

" V ´ T A WAR STE -4' MW-99 -1.03 " ´ -6' " ´ RW-F -3.82 MW-62 1.01

RW-E -7.49

E

U " ´

N

MW-29 E -2.06

V " ´

A

" R ´

E

K E

" " ´ E ´

CMW-15 2.45 M MW-63 2.66 1' 2' 0' MW-97 -0.47 -1' 3' NUE " ´ E T AV WAR " ´ STE CMW-1 3.27 MW-60 -1.61 MW-35 -1.39 " ´ " ´ 0' CMW-2 " ´ MW-61 -1.53 " ´ " ´ MW-64 -0.66 -1' MW-7 -1.61 " ´

" ´

T E

MW-30 -0.62 E CMW-13 0.89

1' R "

´ T T E "

´ RE

S ST

CMW-29S K Terminal Site

" C ´ I

S VAR -3' A

CMW-27 -0.85

M MW-2 -0.89 O

-4'

H

Former Paragon Oil Oil Paragon Former T " ´

"

´

-2'

T

E

Y

CMW-25S 1.54 E

" -4' ´

A " R ´ CMW-28 2.30 " ´ T

EE T

" R W ´ T S 1'

K S

RW-C -5.18

IC Y

AR S

CMW-26 -1.94 V

D

MW-36 -2.18 S

" ´ R

CMW-4 1.30 0'

E A

" ´

MW-67 -1.75 B

R M

MW-28 -2.37 P

O T

CMW-57 -1.77 MW-66 -1.45 L

-1' X

CMW-5 -1.38 E

E

" E ´

R

T

S

S

" ´

N Y

" -2' ´

"

´

MW-40 -2.55 E R

CMW-58 -2.20

-2' R CMW-30 -2.16

-3' E " E " ´ ´

" ´

CMW-33 0.11

U " H ´

CMW-32 1.06 C

CMW-59R -1.01 Q

CMW-6 -2.16 " ´

MW-93 " N ´ " ´

" ´

MW-68R -8.14 " ´ Y

-2' MW-27 0.00 D L " " ´

´ T CMW-53R -5.93 E K E

-2' " ´ R O T UE CMW-63R -1.29

MW-70R -4.29 N CMW-8 -0.12 S O VE

K R A "

´ E R "

´ T IC R

"

´ O

" P ´ R B " ´ VA CMW-47S -1.31 -1' MW-16 -2.35

-1' " ´ " " ´ ´

MW-94 E

" ´ -4' " U MW-73R -0.44 ´

MW-76 -0.30 " " ´ ´

" " ´ ´

MW-72 -0.59 T N

" ´

CMW-9 0.04 CMW-60S 0.00 D E " ´

V " PW-2R -3.39 ´

CMW-23S -0.64 A "

´

" ´ CMW-31 -2.30 " ´ R " ´ MW-75R -6.44

" RW-I -4.11

´ " ´ MW-90 -3.15

CMW-46 -1.97 E " ´

RW-H -3.88

" K ´ MW-77 -0.89 E MW-98 3.38 CMW-61 -2.17 -5'

-2'

" ´

CMW-34S -0.17 EET E TR M

CMW-10 -2.18 S CMW-55 -0.17 RICK VA -6' -4' " " ´ ´ CMW-54 -0.53 T " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ CMW-24S -2.01 " ´ -2' " ´ RW-K -6.96 " ´ T 3'

MW-59 -2.21 E

-2'

CMW-56 -0.35 MW-34 -2.66

" T ´

MW-74R -4.59 E CMW-43R -2.49 E " ´

PW-1R -2.06 R T E CMW-64R -8.05

1' S R

" ´ CMW-62S -2.15

R T

-4'

" S 2' ´ E

-1' CMW-17R -1.40 " Y ´ T

CMW-39 0.66 A N " ´

" ´ " O

W ´ " ´ " ´ 0'

E " H ´

CMW-12 -1.81 G T " ´

" " ´ ´ D RW-L -4.83 N CMW-38 0.39 MW-58 -2.45 I

" ´ A R -2' RIMW-01 0.53 MW-39 -3.04

CMW-42 -0.08 B CMW-35 -2.17 CMW-36S -2.53 CMW-37 -1.95 CMW-21 1.04 REET

" T ´ DAM S 0' VAN " ´ -3' " ´ MW-RWB -3.27 ExxonMobil Off-Site Plume Off-Site ExxonMobil RW-25 -3.43 " ´ " ´ " ´ " ´ " " ´ ´ CMW-16 -0.11 -1' CMW-22 -1.47 T ET AM STRE UE MW-100 -2.40 " ´ D N RIMW-02 0.76 "

´ N CMW-45 -1.66 A E V MW-37 -3.38 V MW-5 -2.53 A " ´ RT

E OO " ´ RV

U E MW-18 2.90 D " ´ N CMW-18 -2.13

N VA MW-88S 1.93

CMW-41S -0.07 E

" ´ V " ´

" ´

A

" " ´ ´

CMW-20 -1.21 U

MW-56 -1.66 A " ´

" ´ S MW-26 -2.46 1' " ´

CMW-19S -0.25

S A Site

" " ´ N ´ AMW-5 1.99

RW-A -5.23

MW-1 1.34

-4' NEWTOWN CREEKNEWTOWN T -3' " ´

E

E "

´

R MW-15 -3.31

CMW-40 0.23 T S " ´

ARW-8 -1.79 O -5'

L " L ´

O Apollo Street

P A " ´ T CMW-44 -2.26 EE

" R ´ O ST

" L ´ APOL " ´

n MW-32 -1.98 io

t AMW-4 -1.62 c MW-57 -2.32 e AOW-3A 1.57 CMW-50 -3.21 ir RW-24 P -5.48 ARW-9 " D ´ " ´ " ´ " w ´ lo

F -4' " ´ REET OLLO ST AP -5' " ´ AOW-8 -1.82 -1' 0' " ´ " ´ " ´ MW-106 -2.27 AOW-1A 6.60 AOW-3 1.37 -1' " ´ -2' " ´ " ´ AMW-3 -2.05 MW-33 -2.48 RW-21 -3.50 " ´ MW-19 11.15 " ´ 0' 1' -5' MW-91 1.10 -4' " ´ " ´ 6' -4' 0' AOW-11 -1.53 ET TRE 2' 3'

" S ´ N 5' AOW-7 -0.88 MW-105 -2.39 HAUSMA -6' 1' " ´ 4' 4' AOW-10 -0.43 " ´ -5' " ´ 2' MW-31 -3.11 -4' " -2' ´ -3' 3' 3' -3' 5' RW-22 -6.06 " ´ 6' " ´ ARW-5 -6.18 -2 AMW-20 -2.03 7' 2' AVE STREET AN

1' AOW-4 3.28 ARW-2 -6.99 AN G " AUSM ´ OR BP Terminal BP H M " ´ 8' 9' 0' " ´ AOW-9 -1.29 MW-38 -3.04 10' " ´ -1' -1' " AOW-6 -1.16 ´ MW-9 -0.05 " ´ CMW-49 -2.36 -2'

" ´

11' Y

-3' 12' A " ´

ARW-7 4.41

AMW-2 -1.96

" W ´

ARW-4 -3.66 " ´ " S ´ 0'

ARW-1 -1.69

NEWTOWN CREEKNEWTOWN AMW-19 -1.37 S

" ´

AMW-21 -2.21 E E R ARW-6 -4.00 U

AN AVEN

AMW-1 1.43 G MOR P

" ´

1' X " ´

13'

E

AMW-10 -1.25 ARW-3 -4.85

" ´ " ´

" S ´ -1' 2'

AMW-8 -2.75

-2' N AMW-6 -0.67 AGP-7 3.30 " E ´ " ´ AGP-5 8.00

" ´ AGP-8 18.11 GP-C 16.92 E

"

´ " ´ MW-20 13.77 AMW-7 0.44 AMW-12 -1.31 U " ´

" ´

AGP-2 " ´ Q 1' " ´ MW-14 2.00

" " ´ ´ " N " ´ ´

AGP-6 D 0.00 " ´ " ´

" Y " ´

´ E AGP-4 0.00 D U L

AGP-3 2.57 N

GAN AVE MOR K

JE-2

AGP-C 13.74

AGP-2 0.00 D O

AMW-9 1.72

" AGP-1 ´ 3'

" " ´ ´ O R

" ´ JE-2 0.82 MW-92 3.42 B AMW-13 D 0.00 " ´ MW-110 " ´ MW-95 1.92 JE-1 " ´ AMW-13 13.63 ET ON STRE

JE-1 SUTT

E

U

N

E

V

A

S

G G

T I N STREE

SUTTO R

E

D

U

N

E

V

A

U

A

S

S

A N

UE ND AVEN KINGSLA

UE ND AVEN KINGSLA AOW-3 0.91' AOW-9 «! AOW-11 ARW-8 !µ 1.22' 3.99' µ! NOTE: Legend !µ AOW-3A !µ !+ AMW-5 1.) PSH- Phase Separated Hydrocarbon ARW-4 !µ 0.01' +! No PSH Measured and No Well Construction Information Available 0.06' CMW-41D 2.) PSH Thickness values are in Feet and µ²! CMW-41S represent in-well thicknesses and not formation thicknesses. µ! MW-1 No PSH Measured, Water Level Within Screened Interval ! CMW-16 µ µ! 3.) The location of CMW and PW wells obtained from surveys ! ²! RIMW-02 conducted by Borbas Surveying for Texaco. ² No PSH Measured and Water Level is Above Screened Interval µ! MW-88D !+ MW-88S CMW-42 All non-CMW or PW well locations provided by ExxonMobil µ! «! AOW-7 or BP. PSH Measured and No Well Construction Information Available µ! 0.14' CMW-40 !µ CMW-17R !µ CMW-43R Flow 4.) Recovery wells (PW-1R, PW-2R, CMW-43R, CMW-53R, ¡! 0.66' MW-56 µ! Di Only PSH Measured, Water Not Detected µ! CMW-22 ! rec 2.65' µ! + PW-1R tion MW-68R, MW-70R, MW-73R, MW-74R, and MW-75R) 1 RIMW-01 µ! BP Terminal Site µ!CMW-55 PW-2R are actively recovering PSH and groundwater with total ²! CMW-64R µ! PSH and Water Level Measured Above the Screened Interval ! MW-73R 0.24' « fluids recovery pumps, where the fluid level in each !+ CMW-63R AMW-4 CMW-23Dµ²!µ !+ µ! ! CMW-56 well under pumping conditions is generally maintained at the PSH Measured and Water Level is Within Screened Interval µ2.60' µ! CMW-23S µ! CMW-59R AOW-4 CMW-39 µ! !+ MW-74Rµ!µ! MW-72 pump intake. This condition allows for the immediate removal µ! 0.41'!µ ´" CMW-21 CMW-54 Not Gauged µ! CMW-57 of PSH as it enters the well and does not allow PSH to ! CMW-53R CMW-20 µ MW-75R µ! 0.42' !µ accumulate in the well. Therefore, these wells are coded red. !µ 1.28' MW-70R MW-69 11/10/2010 PSH Extent AOW-8 CMW-58 ´" 5.) Recovery wells (CMW-59R and CMW-63R) are actively 0.14' 1.43' MW-67 AMW-2 !µ µ! !µ µ! 0.75' recovering groundwater with total fluids recovery pumps. Apollo Street Site ARW-9 MW-68R 1.77' µ! MW-66 ! AMW-20 ´" CMW-38 However, prior to their conversion to recovery wells, µ ARW-9 CMW-19S ! 0.51' µ 0.23' Former Paragon Oil «!3.05' MW-32 CMW-19D PSH was generally not present in the wells. Therefore, !µ ! 0.16' µ² CMW-45 these wells are coded green. µ! ! Currently BP AmocoTerminal ARW-5 µ 1.05' 6.) Monitoring wells (CMW-17R, CMW-23S, CMW-54, CMW-55, 0.29' AMW-3 µ! MW-76 µ²! CMW-25D !µ 1.31' and CMW-56) would have measurable PSH thicknesses if not Former ExxonMobil Properties !µ CMW-25S Apollo Street CMW-12 for the nearby recovery wells. Therefore, they are !µ 0.84' CMW-34D CMW-8 µ! Site CMW-37 CMW-34S µ! 0.12' considered part of the PSH extent, despite the absence !µ CMW-13 1.34' 0.38' !µ² CMW-33 µ! of measurable PSH thicknesses in these wells. !µ 3.82' CMW-14 MW-2 ´" MW-106 MW-57 MW-105 0.90' 0.80' 1.28' µ! µ! ! CMW-18 MW-77 µ ! µ 2.15' 2.97' µ! ²! CMW-15 CMW-44 MW-64 µ! !µ CMW-9 0.98' ! µ! MW-33 µ CMW-4 1.21' CMW-35 MW-118 µ! µ! !µ 2.85' ´" CMW-49 CMW-47D RW-G MW-26 µ!² MW-63 MW-62 1.90' µ! ! µ! CMW-47S CMW-32 µ !µ CMW-24D µ! CMW-46 CMW-62D µ²!MW-78 !µ 0.13' CMW-24S CMW-62S µ²! ´" Former Paragon Oil MW-112 MW-115 1.85' µ! 0.24' µ! RW-25 CMW-36S !µ CMW-60S Terminal Site 2.50'µ! !µ² 2.29' CMW-60D CMW-36D 2.83' MW-111 ´" 2.95' MW-107 MW-58 µ! µ! 1.87' CMW-10 !µ 4.72' CMW-61 1.27' µ! ! MW-3 µ µ! MW-5 CMW-1 2.06' RW-21 CMW-5 µ! 1.13' µ! MW-59 1.70' 0.11' ! µ! µ MW-9 MW-116 2.25' µ! !µ CMW-31 MW-25 !µ 0.78' CMW-6 CMW-28! RW-E 1.83' µ ! 0.27' !µ CMW-2 µ !µ 3.70' µ! MW-113 ´" MW-29 ´" 1.43' MW-60 MW-34 CMW-30 1.64' 1.42' µ! 0.51' !µ µ!

CMW-27 RW-F 0.03' !µ MW-119 MW-94 3.30' !µ µ! ´" MW-24 µ! MW-117 CMW-26 µ! 0.58' µ! MW-61 µ! RW-H 0.77' 2.90' µ! MW-35 µ! 1.93'

ExxonMobil Off-Site Plume MW-90 2.47' RW-22 !µ MW-40 MW-99 1.55' MW-22 ! 1.69' µ! 1.51' !µ µ RW-D MW-7 0.06' µ! RW-I ! 2.17' µ 0.87' 3.57' µ! µ! MW-93 ´" RW-23 ´"

CMW-50 RW-J 1.24' !µ ´" MW-37 1.86' µ!

MW-38 MW-RWB 3.42' µ! 1.82' !µ MW-28 MW-23 1.55' µ! 0.12'µ! 075 150 300

RW-C RW-24 P 2.56' 1.12'µ!²! !µ MW-97! SCALE IN FEET ³ RW-24 W µ FORMER PARAGON OIL TERMINAL TEXACO FACILITY #304209 MW-15 2.21'µ! GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, NY PSH Thickness and Extent

RW-A November 30, 2010 !µ 3.23' µ! RW-K drawn checked approved CSC JAK MW-4 PJC plate no. 1.29' µ! date 1/19/2011 date 1/19/2011 date 1/21/2011 2 MW-31 job no. file no. 46010AT106 Plate_6_Nov_2010_PSH_Thick9_3 1.66' µ! MW-36 2.30' µ! initials date revision CSC 1/20/2011

APPENDIX A

NYCDEP TREATED GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS

Science Applications International Corporation

APPENDIX B

RECOVERED FLUIDS TRANSPORTATION AND RECYCLING DOCUMENTATION

Science Applications International Corporation

APPENDIX C

4TH QUARTER WEEKLY WELL GAUGING SHEETS

Science Applications International Corporation

APPENDIX D

SPENT CARBON AND ORGANOCLAY TRANSPORTATION FORMS

Science Applications International Corporation

APPENDIX E

COMPLETED BOOM INSPECTION FORMS

Science Applications International Corporation