707 16 - 22 May 2014 20 Pages Rs 50
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nepal's Faltering Peace Process
NEPAL’S FALTERING PEACE PROCESS Asia Report Nº163 – 19 February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................i I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 II. CONSENSUS OR CONFLICT? ......................................................................................2 A. WHAT’S LEFT OF THE PEACE PROCESS?.......................................................................................2 B. THE MAOIST-LED GOVERNMENT: IN OFFICE BUT NOT IN POWER? ..............................................3 C. OLD NEPAL: ALIVE AND WELL....................................................................................................5 D. THE RISKS OF FAILURE................................................................................................................6 III. PEACE PARTNERS AT ODDS.......................................................................................8 A. THE MAOISTS: BRINGING ON THE REVOLUTION?.........................................................................8 B. UNCERTAIN COALITION PARTNERS..............................................................................................9 C. THE OPPOSITION: REINVIGORATED, BUT FOR WHAT? ................................................................11 1. The Nepali Congress................................................................................................................. 11 2. The smaller parties ................................................................................................................... -
Case Study on Nepal Observations and Reflections on the Peace and Constitution-Making Process
Case Study on Nepal Observations and Reflections on the Peace and Constitution-Making Process Bishnu Raj Upreti, Research Director, Nepal Centre for Contemporary Research (NCCR), Kathmandu/Nepal Bishnu Sapkota, Founding General Secretary and Member of Board of Directors, Nepal Transition to Peace (NTTP) Institute, Kathmandu/Nepal Imprint Acknowledgement from the authors We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to all the interviewees, without whom this study would not have been possible. The list is too long to include here but we would like to thank all of them for their valuable time, openness during the discussion/interactions, and for sharing precious information and insights with us for this study. Similarly, we owe special thanks to two of our research colleagues: Ms Sharmila Shivakoti (former Research Officer at the NCCR and final year Master's student in Gender Studies) for supporting Bishnu Raj Upreti in collecting and scanning literature, making appointments, accompanying him to many of the meetings and taking notes, transcribing them, arranging transport and formatting the report. Similar support was provided by Mr. Lokendra KC, researcher at the NTTP Institute, who assisted Bishnu Sapkota in making interviews and provided other general research support. We would also like to thank Mr. Suman Babu Paudel (Peace Researcher at NCCR) for his review and assistance in design and formatting. Last but not least, we express our sincere thanks to Dr Andrea Iff, who connected us to this study, and Ms Corinne von Burg, coordinator of this study, who was flexible and open not only to ideas but also to the time schedule. -
Constituent Assembly Election 2064: List of Winning Candidates
Constituent Assembly Election 2064: List of Winning Candidates No. District Const Candidate Name Party Name Gender Age Ethnicity Total Votes 1 Taplejung 1 Surya Man Gurung Nepali Congress M 64 Janajati 8719 2 Taplejung 2 Damber Dhoj Tumbahamphe Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 50 Janajati 8628 3 Panchthar 1 Purna Kumar Serma Nepali Congress M 64 Janajati 12920 4 Panchthar 2 Damber Singh Sambahamphe Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 45 Janajati 12402 5 Ilam 1 Jhal Nath Khanal Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 58 Bahun 17655 6 Ilam 2 Subash Nembang Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 55 Janajati 17748 7 Ilam 3 Kul Bahadur Gurung Nepali Congress M 73 Janajati 16286 8 Jhapa 1 Dharma Prasad Ghimire Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 62 Bahun 15276 9 Jhapa 2 Gauri Shankar Khadka Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 47 Chhetri 18580 10 Jhapa 3 Purna Prasad Rajbansi Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 43 Janajati 16685 11 Jhapa 4 Dharma Sila Chapagain Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) F 35 Bahun 19289 12 Jhapa 5 Keshav Kumar Budhathoki Nepali Congress M 64 16466 13 Jhapa 6 Dipak Karki Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 47 Chhetri 14196 14 Jhapa 7 Bishwodip Lingden Limbu Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 32 Janajati 16099 15 Sankhuwasabha 1 Purna Prasad Rai Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 43 Janajati 12948 16 Sankhuwasabha 2 Dambar Bahadur Khadka Communist Party of Nepal (UML) M 42 Chhetri 10870 17 Tehrathum 1 Tulsi Subba Nepali Congress M 52 Janajati 19113 18 Bhojpur 1 Padam Bahadur Rai Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) M 41 Janajati 15796 19 -
Nepal's New Political Landscape
NEPAL’S NEW POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Asia Report N°156 – 3 July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. THE MAOISTS: PREPARING FOR POWER ............................................................ 2 A. INTERNAL CHALLENGES ..............................................................................................................2 B. EXTERNAL RELATIONS ................................................................................................................4 C. POLICY, IDEOLOGY AND PRAGMATISM ........................................................................................5 D. STRENGTHS AND STRAINS............................................................................................................6 III. THE NEW OPPOSITION................................................................................................ 7 A. THE GRAND OLD PARTIES: IN A HOLE AND DIGGING DEEPER.....................................................7 1. The Nepali Congress....................................................................................................................8 2. The UML .....................................................................................................................................9 3. Can they reform and recover?......................................................................................................9 -
With Case Studies of Liberia, Sierra Leone and South Africa
The PEACE PROCESS AND THE Truth and Reconciliation Commission IN NEPAL: With case studies of Liberia, Sierra Leone and South Africa A Dissertation Submitted By SUNIL THAPA For The Award of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY (M.PHIL) WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND COMMUNICATION ARTS SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA 2017 0 Dedication To all the Nepalis who suffered directly and/or indirectly from the People’s War. I Acknowledgements This thesis could not be written and completed successfully without the input, feedback, suggestions and valuable time provided by dozens of worthy people for whom I have the deepest gratitude. My research work “The Peace Process and the TRC in Nepal: With special case studies of Liberia, Sierra Leone and South Africa” was completed in the Faculty of Humanities and Communication Arts, The Western Sydney University, Australia. I am indebted to the faculty and the university. Most and foremost my special thanks go to my advisor/ supervisor Dr. Drew Cottle from Western Sydney University for his constant encouragement, help, guidance, support, care and trust in me to complete my research. I am thankful to my co-supervisor, Dr. Steven Drakeley too for his regular support and kind cooperation during the research. I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Susan Mowbray from Western Sydney University who always supported me with her eternal patience and writing support process. Her invaluable and constructive comments on my numerous drafts encouraged me to do better. I am very grateful to A/Professor Judith Snodgrass, Professor Tim Rowse, Professor Kerry Robinson, and Dr. Peter Bansel, all from Western Sydney University, for their help and support since the beginning and the completion of this research project. -
Nepal's Faltering Peace Process
NEPAL’S FALTERING PEACE PROCESS Asia Report Nº163 – 19 February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................i I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 II. CONSENSUS OR CONFLICT? ......................................................................................2 A. WHAT’S LEFT OF THE PEACE PROCESS?.......................................................................................2 B. THE MAOIST-LED GOVERNMENT: IN OFFICE BUT NOT IN POWER? ..............................................3 C. OLD NEPAL: ALIVE AND WELL....................................................................................................5 D. THE RISKS OF FAILURE................................................................................................................6 III. PEACE PARTNERS AT ODDS.......................................................................................8 A. THE MAOISTS: BRINGING ON THE REVOLUTION?.........................................................................8 B. UNCERTAIN COALITION PARTNERS..............................................................................................9 C. THE OPPOSITION: REINVIGORATED, BUT FOR WHAT? ................................................................11 1. The Nepali Congress................................................................................................................. 11 2. The smaller parties ................................................................................................................... -
Gan. Atantra Sma-Rak (Republic Memorial)
THE POLITICS OF MEMORY | 171 - GAN. ATANTRA SMARAK (REPUBLIC MEMORIAL): THE POLITICS OF MEMORY Bryony Whitmarsh The damage caused to the perimeter wall of the Narayanhiti Palace compound by the 2015 earthquakes revealed the construction site of the Gaõatantra Smàrak (republic memorial), to anyone walking past its north east corner (Image 1).1 These glimpses, snatched between strands of barbed wire, are representative of the lack of public visibility this project had throughout its design and construction.2 The design competition for a memorial “to symbolize [the] people’s victory over the autocratic monarchy system in Nepal” was launched in 2009 with initial fanfare by the (then Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist [CPN-M] led) government. In April 2009 five shortlisted design teams were invited to give presentations to a jury. The winning design was that proposed by Abhishek Bajracharya and Shekhar Dongol of John Sanday Associates. Since 2012 construction and design has continued under successive coalition governments, concealed behind the walls of the palace compound. The Gaõatantra Smàrak was due to be 1 The earthquakes that struck on April 25 and May 12, 2015 caused around 9,000 deaths and around half a million families in the central region of the country lost their homes. Buildings and infrastructure across Kathmandu was destroyed. 2 Writing about local memorialization projects in Nepal, Simon Robins (2013, 2014) states that there are no official memorial projects in progress, despite the fact the Gaõatantra Smàrak was already under construction. (Robins worked in the field and headquarters of the International Committee of the Red Cross [ICRC]). -
Koirala to Quit Once Successor Issue Is Settled
www.newsfront.com.np Kathmandu l 8-14 Oct, 2007 l # 37 l Price Rs. 25 Dumped before use : The empty ballot boxes meant to be sent for polling booths, will now stored Beleaguered in election commission building. Koirala to quit once successor issue is settled ä nf correspondent its first president and going for proportional representation system, The downslide is complete. From a but there was absolute majority national hero to South Asia's legend, against it during informal consultation GP Koirala is now counting his days among the members of the central since the prime minister is now committee of the Nepali Congress. looking for a dignified exit in the Like UML, some central committee backdrop of his failure to hold members of the Congress party like elections to the constituent assembly Narahari Acharya, Madheshi as scheduled in November. He may Janadhikar Forum (MJF) and National be quitting any moment now. Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NFIN) asked Koirala to quit. Koirala made what appeared like his last political wish when Maoist In fact, Koirala had confided in leader Prachanda and Baburam, some of the Nepali Congress UML Secretary General Madhav ministers on October 4 that he should Kumar Nepal and Congress leader quit simultaneously after the Sher Bahadur Deuba met him announcement to annul polls are separately on Sunday. He asked made public on moral grounds, but them to look for an acceptable way to he was advised against it by two find his successor, although he did not senior ministers, Ram Sharan Mahat make it clear whether he will quit and Ram Chandra Poudel, a before the special session of Congress leader told newsfront. -
Nepal's Peace Agreement
NEPAL’S PEACE AGREEMENT: MAKING IT WORK Asia Report N°126 – 15 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. APRIL AFTERMATH................................................................................................... 2 A. FROM POPULAR PROTEST TO PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY ................................................2 B. A FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT?..............................................................................................3 C. CONTESTED COUNTRY ...........................................................................................................5 III. THE TALKS ................................................................................................................... 6 A. A ROCKY START...................................................................................................................6 1. Eight-point agreement.................................................................................................6 2. Engaging the UN ........................................................................................................7 3. Mutual suspicion.........................................................................................................8 B. THE STICKING POINTS............................................................................................................8 1. Arms -
The Nepali Security Sector
The Nepali Security Sector: An Almanac Bishnu Sapkota (ed.) Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Geneva, Switzerland European Studies Center, Faculty of Humanities, University Pecs, Hungary Published in the European Union in 2009 by Brambauer Publishers, Hungary. The Nepali Security Sector: An Almanac ISBN First edition The Transition Series is jointly published by the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces and the Centre for European Studies. This volume was made possible by generous support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland, and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) as part of the SSR Step Stone Project in Nepal. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Preface VII Philipp H. Fluri and Komal Pokhrel I. Introduction a) Background and Summary 1 Bishnu Sapkota b) Democratising the Security Sector in Nepal: 3 Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead Shiva Hari Dahal II. The Legislature 1. The Legislature-Parliament 19 Dinanath Sharma III. The Executive 2. The Role of the Head of State 39 Krishna Khanal 3. The Role of the Head of State Administration 55 Deepak Prakash Bhatta 4. The Role of the National Security Council: An Analysis 73 Surendra Pandey 5. The Role of the Government 85 Sayed Mohammed Habibullah 6. State, Government and Security 97 Sarita Giri IV. The Security Providers 7. The Nepalese Army 121 Narahari Acharya 8. The People’s Liberation Army 139 Ameet Dhakal 9. The Nepal Police and the Armed Police Force 155 Govinda Thapa 10. Border Security and Management 177 Laxmanlal Karna 11. -
Monarchy, Insurgency, and Uprising in Nepal, 1990-2006
FROM CIVIL SOCIETY TO CITIZEN SOCIETY: MONARCHY, INSURGENCY, AND UPRISING IN NEPAL, 1990-2006 by CHUDAMANI BASNET (Under the Direction of David Smilde) ABSTRACT The character of civil society activism in Nepal—its discourses, its identities, and its practices—has changed several times over the course of two decades. In the 1990s, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and professional organizations were the major actors in the field of civil society, but their roles were largely subordinated to state goals. Beginning in early 2001, civil society activism exhibited a different character, and its public visibility increased dramatically and in more positive ways than in the previous period. As Nepal plunged into a deep political crisis, many new forms of organization and peace publics appeared. Activists associated with these organizations spoke the language of peace, neutrality, and objectivity; yet, they became radicals, and they, in turn, radicalized political discourse. Civil society activism appeared as a powerful force and public identity only in the course of the Second People’s Movement against King Gyanendra’s direct rule in 2005 and 2006, however. In the process, “civil society” became a household name. The King was forced to surrender to the movement in April 2006. This dissertation seeks to understand civil society activism in Nepal in three historical periods—1990-2000, 2001-2004, and 2005-2006. Focusing on three groups of civil society activists—professional organizations, autonomous citizen groups, and the local NGOs, I asks how and why civil society activism took different forms and characters at different historical periods. Drawing on civil society, social movement, and relational sociology literature, I argue that the nature of the evolving political field and the struggle over the meaning of civil society best explain the trajectory of civil society activism in Nepal. -
Nepal's New Political Landscape
NEPAL’S NEW POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Asia Report N°156 – 3 July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. THE MAOISTS: PREPARING FOR POWER ............................................................ 2 A. INTERNAL CHALLENGES ..............................................................................................................2 B. EXTERNAL RELATIONS ................................................................................................................4 C. POLICY, IDEOLOGY AND PRAGMATISM ........................................................................................5 D. STRENGTHS AND STRAINS............................................................................................................6 III. THE NEW OPPOSITION................................................................................................ 7 A. THE GRAND OLD PARTIES: IN A HOLE AND DIGGING DEEPER.....................................................7 1. The Nepali Congress....................................................................................................................8 2. The UML .....................................................................................................................................9 3. Can they reform and recover?......................................................................................................9