Christopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Christopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator a Guest Interview Christopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator Christopher J. Scolese joined the National Aero- nautics and Space Admin- istration (NASA) from his previous position as Deputy Director of the Goddard Space Flight Center. Originally serving as Chief Engineer for NASA, Mr. Scolese was named Associate Administrator of NASA in 2007. He is responsible for over- sight and integration of NASA’s programmatic and technical efforts to ensure the Agency’s overall mission. In 2009, he led the devel- opment, design and imple- mentation of the USA’s civil space programme. He worked closely with both the President of the USA and Congress to ensure NASA’s appropriate support. Mr. Scolese led NASA in their collaboration on inter- national, high-profile space missions including the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station and the Hubble Space Telescope. Mr. Scolese is the recipient of many prestigious honours in- cluding the Presidential Rank Award of Meritorius Execu- : NASA tive and the NASA Distin- guished Leadership Medal. Photo ISO Focus+ October 2011 © ISO Focus+, www.iso.org/isofocus+ 3 a Guest Interview : NASA Photo ISO Focus+ : After 30 years of missions, low-Earth orbit with the technologies of I like to joke with young engineers and NASA is ending its Space Shuttle pro- today. This was the reason for moving on say, “ Think about it : the power of your gramme. Why was this decision taken, from the Space Shuttle to build upon the handheld cellular phone today is probably and what’s next for NASA ? great legacy of that machine. greater than that of the computers that sent Apollo astronauts to the moon in the 1970s ”. Christopher J. Scolese : The Space Shut- Of course, like anything else, the space So, clearly technology, the environment and tle has been around for 30 years and it has industry has changed over the past 30 to globalization have changed the way we all proven itself to be a remarkable machine 40 years. In 1970, roughly, when the Space look at the world. This is all factored into that has accomplished some absolutely Shuttle was conceived, there were really our plans for the future. fantastic missions and tasks. The Hubble only two countries in the world that were Space Telescope and astronomy would not sending people into space : the USA and ISO Focus+ : Space exploration and dis- be where they are today without the Space the Soviet Union. Both countries are very covery are associated with innovation. Can Shuttle and all the work NASA carried out different today ; the world is very different. standards act as a vehicle for disseminating with our international partners. Without the innovation ? Are there particular areas in Shuttle, today’s International Space Station which ISO standards can help the industry (ISS) could not have been built to serve all move forward ? 15 partner countries. Our work on the ISS truly serves the whole world as more and Christopher J. Scolese : Of course people more countries have come to use it. think that standards and innovation do not Now NASA is ready to embark on the go together and that they inhibit what you next phase of space exploration. This will can do. And that is wrong. be the utilization of the ISS now that it In my mind, there are two types of stand- has been built, and we have all started to ards. First, there are systems specifications understand how to exploit it. NASA is in – standards that tell the user the right way a position to carry out necessary research to do things, regardless of the technology : NASA in order to fully utilize the ISS and pre- used. To give you some examples from pare, once again, to send humans beyond Photo my background as an electrical engineer : 4 © ISO Focus+, www.iso.org/isofocus+ ISO Focus+ October 2011 a electromagnetic interference and electro- People sometimes forget that standards move along at the same pace as technol- magnetic compatibility are absolutely vital, evolve with time. This is a job that ISO and ogy because that is where the knowledge is independent of whatever technology is the ISO community do very well – they adapt coming from. This includes how things are being utilized. Both are undeniably critical as we learn things. International Standards tested and designed, and what kind of pro- to success regardless of the technology, are the repository of our knowledge, of cesses, in general, provide the best product because this is a system-level interaction. the knowledge of the community. They possible. And regardless of what innovation ISO develops International Standards explain it and maintain it well : they are is going on, some of those specifications that affect process and procedure. These the caretakers. and standards will directly affect the user must be in place before moving on to new and others need to be adjusted. technologies. What it takes to build a system In general, innovation should occur must not be lost in the shuffle. Standards Collaboration in space before developing a standard for a com- actually help by keeping the focus on the is the norm rather ponent because often different processes right things, at the right time. They serve and procedures are used to develop that as a compendium of knowledge that has than the exception. component, or different material properties been gained in various domains. need to be worked on. Systems specifications, in my view, go across the board. They are the indispensable At the same time, we are constantly learn- ISO Focus+ : NASA experts actively prerequisites to success with both existing ing and updating our standards. This is done participate in the ISO standards-making and future technologies, allowing all of us through a formal process to make sure that process, in particular through technical to innovate, as well as to more easily incor- everyone understands the same thing. Our committee ISO/TC 20, Aircraft and space porate new technologies into the system. duty is to communicate the correct infor- vehicles. What is the value of this involve- The second type of standards are compo- mation, not only to the current generation ment for NASA ? Why does NASA promote nent specifications. In that case, you want of engineers, but to future generations of voluntary consensus-based standards ? to know what you are buying and you want engineers and scientists. Christopher J. Scolese : The first part of to have the standards that are associated your question is easy and my answer will ISO Focus+ : In your view, is there a right with those so that material specifications be in line with statements I have already moment for the development of standards are met. This is very important in order to made. The value of standards to NASA, and for new technologies ? assure commonality across the process and to the community in general, is the know- avoid duplication of testing where it does Christopher J. Scolese : Standards can ledge that is contained in those standards. not add value to the mission or the activity provide specifications for systems and It takes a great deal of effort to collect that that is being carried out. components. The systems specifications knowledge from the best experts in the field, : NASA Photo © ISO Focus+, www.iso.org/isofocus+ a Guest Interview but their participation is a must in the ISO process. This is true whatever the standard being developed, be it for specifications for a material, a system or a process. The best people must be engaged to capture the knowledge and carry it forward to the newer practitioners and to future generations. The value to NASA is twofold : first, the end product standard containing the knowledge ; and second, the interaction among the international group of experts in working groups and technical committees : NASA : NASA responsible for their development. Photo Photo Hubble image of M100 before mirror repair. Hubble image of M100 after mirror repair. International Standards understand that and pass that on. It is also ISO Focus+ : Would you agree that in are the repository even more illuminating to see how things space there are no national boundaries ? of our knowledge. can be done differently, with the same result. What is the importance of international It is rewarding to then actually have the teamwork and cooperation for space dialogue to figure out which way is more programmes (e.g. the International Space It always amazed me, back in the days efficient or better, or represents a different Station, the Hubble Space Telescope) ? Has when I was much more technically involved, regime for the same type of test product. there been a significant change in how the to sit down with colleagues and find out It is really beneficial to NASA to capture industry works since the Space Race of that despite language, despite regional the knowledge and to disseminate it. And the 20th century ? How do International differences, things were being done very probably equally as important is the interac- Standards facilitate dialogue, collabora- much the same way, and the tendency was tion amongst the experts that is promoted by tion and understanding ? to come to the same conclusions. That is the development of International Standards Christopher J. Scolese : Clearly, I agree with very encouraging : to be able to sit there and through these committees. you that there are no national boundaries in space. Hard to draw a line up there. In the beginning of the Space Age, for example, our first missions were undertaken nationally. At the time, each space agency had its own standards. It was difficult to work with so many different standards in different languages with slightly different requirements that were meant to accomplish, in the end, the same thing.
Recommended publications
  • The Space Race
    The Space Race Aims: To arrange the key events of the “Space Race” in chronological order. To decide which country won the Space Race. Space – the Final Frontier “Space” is everything Atmosphere that exists outside of our planet’s atmosphere. The atmosphere is the layer of Earth gas which surrounds our planet. Without it, none of us would be able to breathe! Space The sun is a star which is orbited (circled) by a system of planets. Earth is the third planet from the sun. There are nine planets in our solar system. How many of the other eight can you name? Neptune Saturn Mars Venus SUN Pluto Uranus Jupiter EARTH Mercury What has this got to do with the COLD WAR? Another element of the Cold War was the race to control the final frontier – outer space! Why do you think this would be so important? The Space Race was considered important because it showed the world which country had the best science, technology, and economic system. It would prove which country was the greatest of the superpowers, the USSR or the USA, and which political system was the best – communism or capitalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvaEvCNZymo The Space Race – key events Discuss the following slides in your groups. For each slide, try to agree on: • which of the three options is correct • whether this was an achievement of the Soviet Union (USSR) or the Americans (USA). When did humans first send a satellite into orbit around the Earth? 1940s, 1950s or 1960s? Sputnik 1 was launched in October 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • The New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the International Space
    The New American Space Age: A PROGRESS REPORT ON HUMAN SpaCEFLIGHT The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight The International Space Station: the largest international scientific and engineering achievement in human history. The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight Lately, it seems the public cannot get enough of space! The recent hit movie “Gravity” not only won 7 Academy Awards – it was a runaway box office success, no doubt inspiring young future scientists, engineers and mathematicians just as “2001: A Space Odyssey” did more than 40 years ago. “Cosmos,” a PBS series on the origins of the universe from the 1980s, has been updated to include the latest discoveries – and funded by a major television network in primetime. And let’s not forget the terrific online videos of science experiments from former International Space Station Commander Chris Hadfield that were viewed by millions of people online. Clearly, the American public is eager to carry the torch of space exploration again. Thankfully, NASA and the space industry are building a host of new vehicles that will do just that. American industry is hard at work developing new commercial transportation services to suborbital altitudes and even low Earth orbit. NASA and the space industry are also building vehicles to take astronauts beyond low Earth orbit for the first time since the Apollo program. Meanwhile, in the U.S. National Lab on the space station, unprecedented research in zero-g is paving the way for Earth breakthroughs in genetics, gerontology, new vaccines and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of CHAIRMAN AJIT PAI Re: Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age, IB Docket No
    STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN AJIT PAI Re: Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age, IB Docket No. 18-313. Shortly after becoming FCC Chairman, I had the opportunity to meet Newton Minow, who was Chairman of the FCC during the Kennedy Administration. To me, the most interesting part of our conversation was his description of how the FCC helped spur the beginning of the U.S. commercial space industry. Chairman Minow famously believed that putting satellites into space was more important than putting a human being there. As he put it, “Communications satellites are more important than sending a man into space because they will launch ideas, and ideas will last longer than men and women.” Today, our nation’s commercial space sector is growing rapidly. And at the FCC, we have been working hard to help our industry seize the opportunities of the new space age. Because satellites have become smaller and we now have more agile, reusable launch vehicles, we can send large numbers of satellites into low- or mid-Earth orbit. These non-geostationary satellite orbit, or NGSO, constellations could be a game changer, benefiting Americans across the country and making high-speed Internet access a reality for more consumers—particularly those in remote and hard-to-serve areas. That’s why, under my leadership, the Commission has approved 14 applications and market access requests by 11 companies for NGSO systems. Our action in this area fits well with the FCC’s twin goals of closing the digital divide and promoting innovation. However, more satellites in space means a lot more traffic, especially in low-earth orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA in the Second Space
    NASA in the Second Space Age: Exploration, Partnering, and Security The launch of Sputnik in 1957 and the dawn of the space age set off a frenetic competition between the Soviet Union and the United States. In the years that followed, both nations developed and orbited military satellites with increasingly sophisticated capabilities for intelligence col- lection, communications, and missile warning—capabilities largely in- tended to support strategic nuclear forces.1 For more than three decades the competition between these two superpowers was relatively stable, marked by notable periods of cooperation and engagement. Since the end of the Cold War, however, a gradual change has been under way, driven in part by advances in technology and the proliferation of space capabilities. This transformation has ushered in what the National Aero- nautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Tom Cremins has termed the “second space age.”2 The second space age arguably began with the 1991 Gulf War. This conflict demonstrated, for the first time, the distinct advantages space- based capabilities can provide in conventional war fighting. The col- lapse of the Soviet Union also changed the geopolitical landscape and weakened the superpower duopoly in space. The 2011 National Security Space Strategy (NSSS) defines this new era by what has become known as the three Cs: congested, competitive, and contested.3 Space has be- come congested as more nations and private companies are launching and operating satellites for a variety of missions and increasingly com- petitive as they vie for economic and strategic advantage. According to the Space Foundation, global space activities generated some $330 bil- lion in economic activity in 2014, more than three-quarters of which came from commercial space products, services, infrastructure, and sup- port.4 A robust group of space startup companies has also emerged in recent years, injecting a fresh wave of innovation and competition in the space industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Space the Economic Origins of Space Exploration Age from Colonial America to the Cold War
    The Long Space The Economic Origins of Space Exploration Age from Colonial America to the Cold War Alexander MacDonald Senior Economic Advisor NASA Headquarters Inforum Outlook Conference College Park, MD December 6th, 2018 Questions • Who has funded space exploration over time? • How often has the private-sector funded projects of equivalent size to SpaceShipOne (~$30M) or Elon Musk’s founding of SpaceX (~$100M) or Jeff Bezos’s funding of Blue Origin (~$1B)? • Are there patterns and trends in the motivations that have driven the funding of space exploration projects in the U.S. going back to the Colonial Era? • What can the past tell us about how we might best advance space exploration and space development today? Key Concepts • Intrinsic Motivation: behavior driven by internal interest and enjoyment that is sustainable without regard to external incentive or reward. • Signaling: behavior where one party credibly conveys some information about itself to other parties through costly action. John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) 6th U.S. President (1825-1829) and 1st American Space Advocate Firm believer in science and astronomy - “The science of astronomy is the intercourse of immortal man with the universe” First Annual Address to Congress in 1825 - Proposed a major astronomical observatory - “If we reflect a moment upon the discoveries which, in the last four centuries, have been made in the physical constitution of the universe by the means of these buildings, and of observers stationed in them, shall we doubt of their usefulness to every nation?” -Congress strongly opposed the project House of Representatives 1831-1848 -Smithson bequest in 1836 ($300M/$6B today) -Chair of the House Committee on the Smithsonian, proposes plan with observatory -Compares U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Age Begins
    Chapter 4: The Space Age Begins Chapter 4 M The Space Age Begins Sputnik: Soviet Challenge In the last weekend of September 1957, Bill Pickering made yet another trip to Washington, DC. Fall was a pleasant time to visit the capital. The oppres• sive heat of summer had given way to the milder temperatures of fall, and the frantic rush of tourists and vacationing school children had diminished to a quieter and more tolerable level of noise. The autumn tones of trees and gardens and the lengthening shadows of the waning sun gave the city a gentle patina of tranquility that would be a precursor to the harsh reality of the winter months to follow. Pickering was a delegate to an international conference hosted by the National Academy of Sciences as part of its commitment to the U.S. participa• tion in science programs for the International Geophysical Year (IGY). The IGY had begun on 1 July 1957 and was scheduled to run through December 1958. This conference, sponsored by the Comité Spéciale de l’Année Géophysique Internationale (CSAGI), would focus on planning the rockets and satellite part of the IGY program. It was not the first time that the CSAGI had addressed this issue. Three years earlier at a 1954 conference in Rome, CSAGI had challenged IGY participants to give consideration “ . to launching small satellite vehicles, to their scientific instrumentation and to new problems associated with satellite experiments, such as power supply, telemetering, and orientation of the vehicle.” At that time, the Soviet Union had not joined the IGY program and only the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • REMEMBERING the SPACE AGE ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 F Asro El Yb T Eh S Epu Ir Tn E Edn Tn Fo D Co Mu E Tn S , .U S
    About the Editor here is no doubt that the last 50 years have witnessed numerous accomplishments in Steven J. Dick is the Chief Historian for NASA and what has often been termed “the new Director of the NASA History Division. He worked ocean” of space, harkening back to a long as an astronomer and historian of science at the U.S. tradition of exploration. Earth is now circled by Naval Observatory in Washington, DC for 24 years thousands of satellites, looking both upward into before coming to NASA Headquarters in 2003. space at distant galaxies and downward toward Earth Among his recent books are Societal Impact of for reconnaissance, weather, communications, nav- Spaceflight (NASA SP 4801, 2007, edited with Roger igation, and remote sensing. Robotic space probes Launius), Critical Issues in the History of Spaceflight have explored most of the solar system, returning (NASA SP- 4702, 2006, edited with Roger Launius), astonishing images of alien worlds. Space telescopes The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of have probed the depths of the universe at many Astrobiology (2004, with James Strick), and Sky and wavelengths. In the dramatic arena of human Ocean Joined: The U.S. Naval Observatory, 1830 -2000 spaceflight, 12 men have walked on the surface of the (2003). Dr. Dick is the recipient of the Navy Moon, the Space Shuttle has had 119 flights, and the Meritorious Civilian Service Medal, two NASA International Space Station—a cooperative effort of Group Achievement Awards, and the 2006 LeRoy E. 16 nations—is almost “core complete.” In addition to Doggett Prize for Historical Astronomy of the Russia, which put the first human into space in April American Astronomical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the New Space Age: Government Backs Ambitious Plans for the UK in Space
    Leading the New Space Age: Government backs ambitious plans for the UK in space • Up to £20m could be made available from national and local government, subject to business case, for Spaceport Cornwall and Virgin Orbit as part of the Industrial Strategy spaceflight programme – LaunchUK • UK Space Agency to work with the United States to enhance space weather forecasting, with £7 million for UCL scientists to build key instruments • National Space Council to be established as part of upgrade to UK space strategy and governance. The government is ensuring the UK plays a leading role in the New Space Age as part of its modern Industrial Strategy, with new support for domestic satellite launch capability and space weather forecasting, as well as a new National Space Council to improve UK space strategy. There are significant opportunities for the growing UK space sector as commercial space activity increases globally and the United States leads international efforts to return humans to the Moon by 2024. Spaceport Cornwall and Virgin Orbit The UK Space Agency and Cornwall Council intend to make available up to £20 million for Spaceport Cornwall and US launch operator Virgin Orbit to develop facilities and operational capabilities that would enable small satellite launch from Cornwall in the early 2020s. This investment remains subject to business case approval processes, including from Cornwall Council later this year. The funding would consist of up to £12 million from Cornwall Council and up to £7.85 million from the UK Space Agency, including a contribution of £0.5 million from the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • REMEMBERING the SPACE AGE ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 F Asro El Yb T Eh S Epu Ir Tn E Edn Tn Fo D Co Mu E Tn S , .U S
    REMEMBERING the SPACE AGE ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 F asro le b yt eh S epu ir tn e edn tn fo D co mu e tn s , .U S . G evo r emn tn irP tn i Ogn eciff I tn re en :t skoob t ro e .Popgenoh .vog : lot l f ree ( 0081 215 )-;668 DC a re a( 0081 215 )-202 90000 aF :x ( M4012 a215 )-202 :li S t Ipo DCC, W ihsa gn t no , D C 20402 - 1000 ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 9 780160 817236 ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 F ro as el b yt eh S pu e ir tn e dn e tn fo D co mu e tn s, .U S . G vo er mn e tn P ir tn i gn O eciff I tn re en :t koob s . ro t e opg . vog P noh e : lot l f eer ( 668 ) 215 - 0081 ; DC a er a ( 202 ) 215 - 0081 90000 aF :x ( 202 ) 215 - 4012 Ma :li S t po I DC ,C W a hs i gn t no , D C 20402 - 1000 ISBN 978-0-16-081723-6 9 780160 817236 REMEMBERING the SPACE AGE Steven J. Dick Editor National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations History Division Washington, DC 2008 NASA SP-2008-4703 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Remembering the Space Age / Steven J. Dick, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Astronautics--History--20th century. I. Dick, Steven J. TL788.5.R46 2008 629.4’109045--dc22 2008019448 CONTENTS Acknowledgments .......................................vii Introduction ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Space Age ~
    PART III. REFLECTIONS ON THE SPACE AGE ~ CHAPTER 18 AM ELANCHOLIC SPACE AGE ANNIVERSARY Walter A. McDougall y sincere thanks to Steven Dick, Roger Launius, and the entire space Mhistory and space policy communities for inviting an old dilettante like myself to this event. Some of you good people I’ve not seen since we commemorated the 40th anniversary of Sputnik, and some of you doubtless I shall not have occasion to meet again. That alone makes this a somewhat melancholy affair for me. But I also have a sense that the 50th anniversary of the birth of the Space Age is draped with a certain melancholy. Do you sense a mood of disappointment, frustration, impatience over the failure of the human race to achieve much more than the minimum extrapolations made back in the 1950s, and considerably less than the buoyant expectations expressed as late as the 1970s? After all, one modest prediction went like this: “There are few today who do not look forward with feelings of confidence that spaceflight will some day be accomplished. All that we require is to make rocket motors somewhat larger than those already in existence . the pooling of skills already available, and a good deal of money . We may reasonably suppose that a satellite vehicle is entirely practicable now and that travel to the moon is attainable in the next fifty years.”1 That was Dr. Hugh Dryden in 1953, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Wright brothers’ flight. (Indeed, if all of us interviewed by the media this month have accomplished anything I think we have at last disabused journalists of the notion that the Eisenhower administration was “surprised” by the first satellite launch.) But what that means is that all the satellites, space probes, and human missions launched over 50 years amount pretty much to what Dryden took for granted would happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy in the Space Age - Erik Tandberg
    ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS - Explorations in Space: Astronomy in the Space Age - Erik Tandberg EXPLORATIONS IN SPACE: ASTRONOMY IN THE SPACE AGE Erik Tandberg Sondreveien 4 K, 0378 Oslo, Norway Keywords: Satellites, Moon, Apollo Program, Soviet Plans, Lunar Landing, Soviet Lunar Probes, Lunar, Probes, Solar, System, Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Asteroids, Comets, Dwarf Planets Contents 1. The First Satellites 2. Towards the Moon 2.1. The Apollo Program 2.2. Soviet Plans for a Manned Lunar Landing 2.3. A New Wave of Soviet Lunar Probes 2.4. Lunar Probes in Recent Years 3. Exploring Other Members of the Solar System 3.1. The Sun 3.2. Mercury 3.3. Venus 3.4. Mars 3.5. Jupiter 3.6. Saturn 3.7. Uranus 3.8. Neptune 3.9. Asteroids 3.10. Comets 3.11. Dwarf Planets Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS The classic instrument of the astronomer since the 16th and 17th centuries has been the optical telescope. Together with the spectroscope, the radio telescope and other instruments on the ground, this powerful tool has given later astronomers a good insight into the fantasticSAMPLE universe around us – and willCHAPTERS continue to do so through technical improvements such as larger, better mirrors and adaptive optics. A new window to the universe was opened with the launching of Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite, on October 4, 1957. In the Space Age we could place optical telescopes and other tools in orbit around the Earth, send instruments to other celestial bodies and put manned spacecraft on the surface of the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Research
    .. , •. ...·, I • /•. ~., . .· •. ! . ..... ':' . .. · ~ ;· - ·, ~ ·~ . '"t. ....i.,. "' .c~ • .. "" · II. '"' • •.. .. - ~ . ¥>' • .... - ~ . .' ·4 ' ~I·: , ,. .::,... ~ " . :..., , ....... : • , f- ••'- ~- ;a ;·· •J •' ... : ~ ,. ~.. • .. ... .. .. ..+'. .,_ A HISTORY OF SPACE RESEARCH The Space Age officially began on October 4, 1957, when the first man-made object ever to orbit the earth was successfully launched. It is presumptuous, however, to use this date as the start of space flight. Any great project must start with a dream, and man was dreaming of probing the space beyond his planet centuries before the word sputnik was added to our lexicon . The name of the first dreamer is unknown. Surely, at some point in unrecorded history when man's intelligence had progressed sufficiently to contemplate the idea , a man looked at a sta r and realized that it was not part of his planet. The first recorded beliefs that there were other bodies in space pre-date the birth of Christ. The first science fiction story-an indication that man had already started to think about moving beyond his planet-was published about 160 A.D. The next major steps toward achieving flight in space did not occur until the 16th and 17th centuries. With the invention of the telescope, astronomy became a scien ce. In the 16th century, Copernicus laid the groundwork for modern space cartog­ raphy with a published work called " On the Revolution of Celestial Bodies." He was * * * p * * followed by Johannes Kepler, who discovered the laws of planetary motion, and by the Italian astronomer Galileo. During the next two centuries there were a great many people who contributed to thought about space flight, some scientists, some dreamers.
    [Show full text]