DOCSLIB.ORG

Sex in Smut Fungi: Structure, Function and Evolution of Mating-Type Complexes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sex in Smut Fungi: Structure, Function and Evolution of Mating-Type Complexes Fungal Genetics and Biology 45 (2008) S15–S21 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fungal Genetics and Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yfgbi Review Sex in smut fungi: Structure, function and evolution of mating-type complexes Guus Bakkeren a, Jörg Kämper b, Jan Schirawski c,* a Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Summerland, BC, Canada V0H 1Z0 b University of Karlsruhe, Institute for Applied Biosciences, Department of Genetics, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany c Max-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany article info abstract Article history: Smut fungi are basidiomycete plant pathogens that pose a threat to many important cereal crops. In order Received 4 February 2008 to be pathogenic on plants, smut fungal cells of compatible mating-type need to fuse. Fusion and path- Accepted 11 April 2008 ogenicity are regulated by two loci, a and b, which harbor conserved genes. The functions of the encoded Available online 22 May 2008 mating-type complexes have been well-studied in the model fungus Ustilago maydis and will be briefly reviewed here. Sequence comparison of the mating-type loci of different smut and related fungi has Keywords: revealed that these loci differ substantially in structure. These structural differences point to an evolution Pheromone receptor from tetrapolar to bipolar mating behavior, which might have occurred several independent times during Homeodomain fungal speciation. Sporisorium reilianum Ustilago hordei Ó 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Malassezia globosa 1. Introduction vanced our understanding of the biology of smut fungi. The U. maydis genome sequence is publicly available through the Smut fungi are important cereal crop pathogens that depend on Broad Institute (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/fungi/usti- sex to cause disease. There are approximately 1200 smut species lago_maydis/) and has been manually annotated by the Munich known that together can infect more than 4000 different plant spe- Institute for Protein Sequences (MIPS; http://MIPS.gsf.de/genre/ cies. The vast majority of plant species serving as hosts are from proj/ustilago/). Genome sequencing efforts are under way for the grass family (Graminaceae) and includes the world’s most S. reilianum (R. Kahmann and J. Schirawski, unpublished) and for important crops: corn, barley, wheat, oats, sorghum, sugarcane U. hordei (R. Kahmann, J. Schirawski and G. Bakkeren, unpublished) and forage grasses. Smut symptoms are characterized by the for- that will allow whole genome comparison of these related smut mation of fruiting structures containing black masses of teliospores species and is expected to lead to insights into the determinants that give the infected tissue a ‘‘sooty” or ‘‘smutted” appearance. of host selection and symptom formation. While most smut fungi develop sexual spores exclusively in the Common to all smut species investigated so far is their need to inflorescence and symptoms are visible only late in the infection undergo a successful mating reaction to form dikaryotic hyphae upon heading, Ustilago maydis, the corn smut pathogen, is a notable before being able to infect a host plant. On the other hand, the exception that can induce tumors, in which the fungal spores de- infectious dikaryon requires a host for proliferation and for the for- velop, on all above-ground parts of the plant. Since fungal biomass mation of sexual spores. Thus, sex and pathogenesis are intimately usually develops in inflorescences of infected plants, considerable intertwined in these species. yield reductions are suffered. Therefore, it is not surprising that For mating to occur, two haploid cells of different mating-type smuts have been the subject of intense study for the last century. need to recognize each other and fuse to form the infectious dikar- However, molecular insight on mating systems and their function yon. Mating is regulated by two loci, a and b, which harbor con- has so far only been obtained for three smut species, the corn served genes. At the a locus, these genes encode pheromones and smuts U. maydis and Sporisorium reilianum and the barley smut pheromone receptors while at the b locus two subunits of a hete- Ustilago hordei. All three species show a close phylogenetic rela- rodimeric transcription factor are encoded. In S. reilianum and tionship (Bakkeren et al., 2000) that is reflected by the ease with U. maydis that have a tetrapolar mating system, these genetic loci which molecular tools developed for one species can be transferred segregate independently, while in bipolar species, such as to the other species. The elucidation of the complete genome se- U. hordei, the a and b loci are linked and MAT segregates as one lo- quence of U. maydis (Kämper et al., 2006) has enormously ad- cus. Despite the similarity in gene function and sequence, in the three smuts that have been analyzed at a molecular level (U. may- * Corresponding author. Fax: +49 6421 178609. dis, U. hordei and S. reilianum), the mating-type loci differ substan- E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Schirawski). tially in locus structure. These differences will be reviewed to cover 1087-1845/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2008.04.005 S16 G. Bakkeren et al. / Fungal Genetics and Biology 45 (2008) S15–S21 function, structure and evolution of mating complexes in compar- different mating-type alleles are known (Bakkeren and Kronstad, ison to a few more distantly related fungal basidiomycete species 1994), five different b alleles have been described in S. reilianum for which molecular data exist. (Schirawski et al., 2005) and at least 19 exist in U. maydis (J. Kämper and R. Kahmann, unpublished). Interestingly, both bE 2. Structure of mating-type loci and bW mating-type genes are present in the genome of the Usti- laginomycete Malassezia globosa (Table 1), a human pathogenic The b mating-type genes encode two subunits of a homeodo- fungus involved in dandruff disease, for which no sexual cycle is main (HD) transcription factor, consisting of an HD1 class and an known (Xu et al., 2007). Even the distantly related, opportunistic HD2-class protein. In general, the HD1 and HD2 proteins are not human pathogen, the Tremellomycete Cryptococcus neoformans related to each other in primary sequence; however, they share a (Table 1), carries HD1- and HD2-encoding genes within the mat- common domain organization. The N-terminal regions of the HD ing-type region (Loftus et al., 2005). For C. neoformans, two mating proteins contain the highest degree of variation when different al- types are known but in this species each mating type has retained leles are compared and are thus designated as variable regions, only one of the b mating-type genes, with the HD1 protein being while the C-terminal regions of the proteins, including the homeo- specific for the MATa mating type and the HD2 protein being pres- domains, are highly conserved (Gillissen et al., 1992; Kronstad and ent only in the MATa mating-type region (Fig. 1; Fraser et al., 2004; Leong, 1990; Schulz et al., 1990). The tetrapolar species U. maydis Lengeler et al., 2002). and S. reilianum as well as the bipolar species U. hordei possess In addition to the b mating-type complexes, smut fungi contain one divergently transcribed gene pair encoding the homeodomain genes necessary for cell–cell recognition located in the a mating- proteins bE (HD1) and bW (HD2; Fig. 1). For the b mating-type type loci, encoding pheromones and pheromone receptors. The genes of U. maydis, S. reilianum and the U. hordei MAT-1 locus, gene detailed structure of these loci has been determined for both a order, orientation, as well as the genomic context are conserved alleles of U. maydis, for all three a alleles of S. reilianum and (Fig. 1). The orientation of the divergently transcribed b gene pair for the MAT-1 allele of U. hordei (Fig. 1). For the MAT-2 allele of seems inverted in the U. hordei MAT-2 locus. In the absence of U. hordei only partial information is available (Fig. 1). additional sequence information for the MAT-2 locus of U. hordei, Both U. maydis and U. hordei have two alleles of an a mating sys- it cannot be assessed, whether this gene pair is part of an inversion tem with one pheromone receptor (pra) and one functional phero- covering a large genomic context. While from U. hordei two mone gene (mfa) per locus (Anderson et al., 1999; Bakkeren and Fig. 1. Genetic organization of the mating-type loci of selected basidiomycetes. Genes are indicated by arrows with the arrow denoting direction of transcription. Related genes are denoted by the same color and respective gene functions are explained in the lower part of the Figure. Ã indicates that the relative order and orientation of these genes has not been determined. In the tetrapolar species U. maydis and S. reilianum the a and b specific sequences reside on different chromosomes while they are linked by spacer regions (which are not drawn to scale and whose length is indicated) in the bipolar species U. hordei and C. neoformans, as well as in M. globosa. The black bars on top of the figure indicate the regions of the b locus, which covers the two homeodomain protein genes bE and bW, and the a locus (that expands to different length in the different loci, indicated by a broken line) from the lba gene to the rba gene. Sequence information was obtained from the following Accession Nos. AF043940, AM118080, AAC- P01000083, AACP01000013, AJ884588, AJ884583, AJ884590, AJ884585, AJ884589, AJ884584, U37796, M84182, AF184070, AF184069, Z18531, AAYY01000003, AF542530, and AF542531. G. Bakkeren et al. / Fungal Genetics and Biology 45 (2008) S15–S21 S17 Table 1 Taxonomic information on the basidiomycete fungi compared Class Species Mating system Reference Agaricomycotina Agaricomycetes Coprinopsis cinerea (syn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Mushrooms Have Evolved to Be So Promiscuous: Insights from Evolutionary and Ecological Patterns
    fungal biology reviews 29 (2015) 167e178 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fbr Review Why mushrooms have evolved to be so promiscuous: Insights from evolutionary and ecological patterns Timothy Y. JAMES* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA article info abstract Article history: Agaricomycetes, the mushrooms, are considered to have a promiscuous mating system, Received 27 May 2015 because most populations have a large number of mating types. This diversity of mating Received in revised form types ensures a high outcrossing efficiency, the probability of encountering a compatible 17 October 2015 mate when mating at random, because nearly every homokaryotic genotype is compatible Accepted 23 October 2015 with every other. Here I summarize the data from mating type surveys and genetic analysis of mating type loci and ask what evolutionary and ecological factors have promoted pro- Keywords: miscuity. Outcrossing efficiency is equally high in both bipolar and tetrapolar species Genomic conflict with a median value of 0.967 in Agaricomycetes. The sessile nature of the homokaryotic Homeodomain mycelium coupled with frequent long distance dispersal could account for selection favor- Outbreeding potential ing a high outcrossing efficiency as opportunities for choosing mates may be minimal. Pheromone receptor Consistent with a role of mating type in mediating cytoplasmic-nuclear genomic conflict, Agaricomycetes have evolved away from a haploid yeast phase towards hyphal fusions that display reciprocal nuclear migration after mating rather than cytoplasmic fusion. Importantly, the evolution of this mating behavior is precisely timed with the onset of diversification of mating type alleles at the pheromone/receptor mating type loci that are known to control reciprocal nuclear migration during mating.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Evolution: Major Ecological Adaptations and Evolutionary Transitions
    Biol. Rev. (2019), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12510 Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions Miguel A. Naranjo-Ortiz1 and Toni Gabaldon´ 1,2,3∗ 1Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain 2 Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT Fungi are a highly diverse group of heterotrophic eukaryotes characterized by the absence of phagotrophy and the presence of a chitinous cell wall. While unicellular fungi are far from rare, part of the evolutionary success of the group resides in their ability to grow indefinitely as a cylindrical multinucleated cell (hypha). Armed with these morphological traits and with an extremely high metabolical diversity, fungi have conquered numerous ecological niches and have shaped a whole world of interactions with other living organisms. Herein we survey the main evolutionary and ecological processes that have guided fungal diversity. We will first review the ecology and evolution of the zoosporic lineages and the process of terrestrialization, as one of the major evolutionary transitions in this kingdom. Several plausible scenarios have been proposed for fungal terrestralization and we here propose a new scenario, which considers icy environments as a transitory niche between water and emerged land. We then focus on exploring the main ecological relationships of Fungi with other organisms (other fungi, protozoans, animals and plants), as well as the origin of adaptations to certain specialized ecological niches within the group (lichens, black fungi and yeasts).
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 716–784 By: P.W
    Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784 By: P.W. Crous, M.J. Wingfield, T.I. Burgess, G.E.St.J. Hardy, J. Gené, J. Guarro, I.G. Baseia, D. García, L.F.P. Gusmão, C.M. Souza-Motta, R. Thangavel, S. Adamčík, A. Barili, C.W. Barnes, J.D.P. Bezerra, J.J. Bordallo, J.F. Cano-Lira, R.J.V. de Oliveira, E. Ercole, V. Hubka, I. Iturrieta-González, A. Kubátová, M.P. Martín, P.-A. Moreau, A. Morte, M.E. Ordoñez, A. Rodríguez, A.M. Stchigel, A. Vizzini, J. Abdollahzadeh, V.P. Abreu, K. Adamčíková, G.M.R. Albuquerque, A.V. Alexandrova, E. Álvarez Duarte, C. Armstrong-Cho, S. Banniza, R.N. Barbosa, J.-M. Bellanger, J.L. Bezerra, T.S. Cabral, M. Caboň, E. Caicedo, T. Cantillo, A.J. Carnegie, L.T. Carmo, R.F. Castañeda-Ruiz, C.R. Clement, A. Čmoková, L.B. Conceição, R.H.S.F. Cruz, U. Damm, B.D.B. da Silva, G.A. da Silva, R.M.F. da Silva, A.L.C.M. de A. Santiago, L.F. de Oliveira, C.A.F. de Souza, F. Déniel, B. Dima, G. Dong, J. Edwards, C.R. Félix, J. Fournier, T.B. Gibertoni, K. Hosaka, T. Iturriaga, M. Jadan, J.-L. Jany, Ž. Jurjević, M. Kolařík, I. Kušan, M.F. Landell, T.R. Leite Cordeiro, D.X. Lima, M. Loizides, S. Luo, A.R. Machado, H. Madrid, O.M.C. Magalhães, P. Marinho, N. Matočec, A. Mešić, A.N. Miller, O.V. Morozova, R.P. Neves, K. Nonaka, A. Nováková, N.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Master Teachers Who Fostered American Turn-Of-The-(20<Sup>TH
    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 Mycotaxon, Ltd. ©2021 January–March 2021—Volume 136, pp. 1–58 https://doi.org/10.5248/136.1 Four master teachers who fostered American turn-of-the-(20TH)-century mycology and plant pathology Ronald H. Petersen Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37919-1100 Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—The Morrill Act of 1862 afforded the US states the opportunity to found state colleges with agriculture as part of their mission—the so-called “land-grant colleges.” The Hatch Act of 1887 gave the same opportunity for agricultural experiment stations as functions of the land-grant colleges, and the “third Morrill Act” (the Smith-Lever Act) of 1914 added an extension dimension to the experiment stations. Overall, the end of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th was a time for growing appreciation for, and growth of institutional education in the natural sciences, especially botany and its specialties, mycology, and phytopathology. This paper outlines a particular genealogy of mycologists and plant pathologists representative of this era. Professor Albert Nelson Prentiss, first of Michigan State then of Cornell, Professor William Russel Dudley of Cornell and Stanford, Professor Mason Blanchard Thomas of Wabash College, and Professor Herbert Hice Whetzel of Cornell Plant Pathology were major players in the scenario. The supporting cast, the students selected, trained, and guided by these men, was legion, a few of whom are briefly traced here. Key words—“New Botany,” European influence, agrarian roots Chapter 1. Introduction When Dr. Lexemual R.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Smuts, RPD No
    report on RPD No. 203 PLANT February 1990 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN CORN SMUTS Corn smuts occur throughout the world. Common corn smut, caused by the fungus Ustilago zeae (synonym U. maydis), and head smut, caused by the fungus Sporisorium holci-sorghi (synonyms Sphacelotheca reiliana, Sorosporium reilianum and Sporisorium reilianum), are spectacular in appearance and easily distinguished. Common smut occurs worldwide wherever corn (maize) is grown, by presence of large conspicuous galls or replacement of grain kernels with smut sori. The quality of the remaining yield is often reduced by the presence of black smut spores on the surface of healthy kernels. COMMON SMUT Common smut is well known to all Illinois growers. The fungus attacks only corn–field corn (dent and flint), Indian or ornamental corn, popcorn, and sweet corn–and the closely related teosinte (Zea mays subsp. mexicana) but is most destructive to sweet corn. The smut is most prevalent on young, actively growing plants that have Figure 1. Infection of common corn smut been injured by detasseling in seed fields, hail, blowing soil or and on the ear. Smut galls are covered by the particles, insects, “buggy-whipping”, and by cultivation or spraying silvery white membrane. equipment. Corn smut differs from other cereal smuts in that any part of the plant above ground may be attacked, from the seedling stage to maturity. Losses from common smut are highly variable and rather difficult to measure, ranging from a trace up to 10 percent or more in localized areas. In rare cases, the loss in a particular field of sweet corn may approach 100 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL of SMUT in WHEAT and OTHER SMALL GRAINS by H
    Bulletin No. 116 June, 1931 Montana State College, Extension Service, J. C. Taylor, Director, Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics. Montana State College and Uni~ed States Department of Agriculture, co-operating. Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress ~ay 8 and June 30, 1.914. ~ CONTROL OF SMUT IN WHEAT AND OTHER SMALL GRAINS By H. E. Morris, Extension Plant Pathologist Waldo Kidder, Extension Agronomist Smuts cost the farmers of Montana many thousands of dollars each year. In 1930, stinking smut of wheat alone caused a loss of approximately $750;000, due to decreased yields and to a lower price per bushel. This loss and also that due to the smuts {..:Fig. 1. Smutted and normal heads of wheat. The head at the left ,is a typi:cal head affected with covered or stinking smut, The next, head IS a he'althy head. The two heads on the right show two stages of the loose smut in wheat. (-Courtesy,D. S. Dept. of Agr.) . ,( 2 MONTANA EXTENSION SERVICE of oats, barley and rye may be largely prevented by adopting the methods of seed treatment described in this bulletin. What Is Smut Smut is produced by a small parasitic plant, mould-like in appearance, belonging to a group called fungi (Fig. 2). Smut lives most of its life within and at the expense of the wheat plant. The smut powder, so familiar to all, is composed of myriads of spores which correspond to seeds in the higher plants. In the process of harvesting and threshing, these spores are dis· I Fig'.
    [Show full text]
  • Crittendenia Gen. Nov., a New Lichenicolous Lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a Review of the Biology
    The Lichenologist (2021), 53, 103–116 doi:10.1017/S002428292000033X Standard Paper Crittendenia gen. nov., a new lichenicolous lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a review of the biology, phylogeny and classification of lichenicolous heterobasidiomycetes Ana M. Millanes1, Paul Diederich2, Martin Westberg3 and Mats Wedin4 1Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, E-28933 Móstoles, Spain; 2Musée national d’histoire naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg; 3Museum of Evolution, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden and 4Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The lichenicolous ‘heterobasidiomycetes’ belong in the Tremellomycetes (Agaricomycotina) and in the Pucciniomycotina. In this paper, we provide an introduction and review of these lichenicolous taxa, focusing on recent studies and novelties of their classification, phylogeny and evolution. Lichen-inhabiting fungi in the Pucciniomycotina are represented by only a small number of species included in the genera Chionosphaera, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma. The phylogenetic position of the lichenicolous representatives of Chionosphaera has, however, never been investigated by molecular methods. Phylogenetic analyses using the nuclear SSU, ITS, and LSU ribosomal DNA mar- kers reveal that the lichenicolous members of Chionosphaera form a monophyletic group in the Pucciniomycotina, distinct from Chionosphaera and outside the Chionosphaeraceae. The new genus Crittendenia is described to accommodate these lichen-inhabiting spe- cies. Crittendenia is characterized by minute synnemata-like basidiomata, the presence of clamp connections and aseptate tubular basidia from which 4–7 spores discharge passively, often in groups. Crittendenia, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma are the only lichenicolous lineages known so far in the Pucciniomycotina, whereas Chionosphaera does not include any lichenicolous taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Smuts S
    A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication Oregon State University • University of Idaho • Washington State University PNW 647 • July 2013 Corn Smuts S. K. Mohan, P. B. Hamm, G. H. Clough, and L. J. du Toit orn smuts are widely distributed throughout the world. The incidence of corn smuts in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) varies Cby location and is usually low. Nonetheless, these diseases occasionally cause significant economic losses when susceptible cultivars are grown under conditions favorable for disease development. Smut diseases of corn are, in general, more destructive to sweet corn than to field corn. The term smut is derived from the powdery, dark brown to black, soot-like mass of spores produced in galls. These galls can form on various plant parts. Three types of smut infect corn—common smut, caused by Ustilago maydis (= Ustilago zeae); head smut, caused by Sphacelotheca reiliana; and false smut, caused by Ustilaginoidea virens. False smut is not a concern in the PNW, so this publication deals University S. Krishna by State Mohan,Photo © Oregon only with common and head smuts. Figure 1. Common smut galls on an ear of sweet corn. Each gall represents a single kernel infected by the common Common smut smut fungus. Common smut is caused by the fungal pathogen U. maydis and is also known as boil smut or blister smut (Figure 1). Common smut occurs throughout PNW corn production areas, although it is less common in western Oregon and western Washington than east of the Cascade Mountains. Infection in commercial plantings may result in considerable damage and yield loss in some older sweet corn cultivars, but yield loss in some of the newer, less susceptible cultivars is rarely significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Intron Evolution: Why a Small Genome Has Many Introns? Kemin Zhou, Alan Kuo, Asaf Salamov, and Igor Grigoriev
    Fungal Intron Evolution: Why a small genome has many introns? Kemin Zhou, Alan Kuo, Asaf Salamov, and Igor Grigoriev Introduction Exon number reduction half loss rule. S. roseus is an exception Most frequent and the shortest exon length and evidence of intron loss Here we are trying to answer the question why one of the Table 2. Intron evolution within genomes. Coding exon number between differently smallest genome Sporobolomyces roseus has one of the most conserved genes were compared. The genes were divided in four conservation groups: introns of all fungal genomes in the context of fungal intron Sporo1 all--all genomes (GCAS), between-- between different phyla (GCBP), phylum--within the y = 0.503 x + 1.172 evolution. In this study we used a statistical comparative 1000 −0.7812x same phylum (GCWP), and species-specific genes (SSG). The p-values for t-test are 0 280067 genomics approach toward intron number evolution among 16 No Sporo1, p-val=8.196e-07 L = 1060.1e −1.8961x +198.5 1 206910 colored red if less than 10e-4, pink if less than10e-3, yellow if less than 10e-2, and green fungal genomes. Pospl1 2 206494 if less than 0.05. 600 2000 2500 3000 Table1. Fungal genomes used in this study. cryneo1 567 Database Species dbname all p-val between p-val phylum p-val species Lacbi1 Length Exon Average Count 0 200 Aspni1 Aspergillus niger Aspni1 3.76 8.61E-08 3.31 3.24E-09 3.02 0.002406 2.83 Phchr1 Phybl1 copci1 Mycfi1 Mycosphaerella fijiensis Batde5 5.90 0.000305 5.18 0.224571 4.86 8.79E-07 3.57 copci1 7.32 0.000322 6.61 8.94E-18 5.65 4.17E-34
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi Fundamentals What Is Biology? What Is Life? Seven Common Components to All Life Forms
    Fungi Fundamentals What is Biology? What is life? Seven common components to all life forms. What are fungi? How do fungi compare to other organisms on the tree of life? What are fungi? • Eukaryotic What are fungi? • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous What are fungi? • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic What are fungi? • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic • Sessile/non-motile = “Vegetative” What are fungi? • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic • Sessile/non-motile = “Vegetative” • Reproduce via spores (sexual & asexual) Kingdom Fungi • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic • Sessile/non-motile = “Vegetative” • Reproduce via spores (sexual & asexual) Kingdom Fungi • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic hyphae • Sessile/non-motile = “Vegetative” • Reproduce via spores (sexual & asexual) mycelium Kingdom Fungi Symbiotic Fungi • Eukaryotic • Multicellular / Filamentous • Heterotrophic • Sessile/non-motile = “Vegetative” • Reproduce via spores (sexual & asexual) Mycorrhizal mutualists Parasitic / Pathogenic Fungi Decay fungi “saprotrophic” Mycology: Laboratory Homework Fungi Are Everywhere! - Expose Malt Extract Agar Petri dishes to the environment of your home. Overnight. Anywhere you want. - Label plate and seal with parafilm. - Wait 3 days. - Record what grows on days 4-6. Bring back next week! Mycology: Laboratory Homework Fungi Are Everywhere! - Expose Malt Extract Agar Petri dishes to the environment of your home. Overnight. Anywhere you want. - Label plate and seal with parafilm. - Wait 3 days. - Record what grows on days 4-6. Bring back next week! Mycology: Laboratory Homework Growing Mushrooms! - Buy some mushrooms from the grocery store and bring them in next week so we can start growing them. Biological Diversity Species concepts Morphological species concept: species can be differentiated from each other by physical features. Not all mushrooms are alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Loose Smut of Barley Richard Mullington Lewis Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1962 Control of loose smut of barley Richard Mullington Lewis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Lewis, Richard Mullington, "Control of loose smut of barley " (1962). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2102. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2102 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 63-1587 microfilmed exactly as received LEWIS, Richard Mullington, 1920- CONTROL OF LOOSE SMUT OF BARLEY. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1962 Agriculture, plant pathology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CONTROL OF LOOSE SMUT OF BARLEY by Richard Mullington Lewis A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Plant Pathology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major D rtment Signature was redacted for privacy. D^ân of Grad lollege Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1962 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 PERTINENT LITERATURE 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 Materials 6 Methods of Application 7 Seed Treatment Evaluations 12 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 15 1952 Results 15 1953 Results 18 195m- Results 24 1955 Results 39 DISCUSSION 41 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 48 LITERATURE CITED 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 APPENDIX 54 iii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1.
    [Show full text]