Pdf2013 WK 10 Communication L. Istrate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pdf2013 WK 10 Communication L. Istrate Communication comes naturally – or does it? ProPark N2000 LIFE project: Efficient Managers for Efficient Natura 2000 Network Training Needs Assesment Natura 2000 custodians and administrators in Romania Case study - “For nature and local communities - the basis for a Natura 2000 integrated management in Hartibaciu -Tarnava Mare area” Topics Efficient Managers for Efficient Natura2000 Network 2012-2015 513.114 euro 254.129 euro EU contribution LIFE+Information and Communication Increase management capacity and support for Natura 2000 sites in Romania by developing the communication skills of site managers and by supporting the integration of biodiversity concerns in territorial planning processes in and around Natura 2000 sites. Aim Objective 1 Develop and disseminate best practice guidance and improve skills and capacity of site managers on communicating Natura 2000 by providing high quality communications training programme and producing a communications toolkit for Natura2000 managers in Europe. Support improved territorial planning in Romania that incorporates biodiversity concerns by providing guidance to the most important economic sectors that are using land and natural resources on how to contribute actively to the development of regional territorial plans that reflect biodiversity concerns, including objectives of the Natura 2000 network. Objective 2 - training needs assessment custodians/administrators Natura 2000 sites - 6 communications trainings events in Romania /90 participants - 2 communications trainings events in Europe /30 participants - Natura 2000 Communication Training Programme for Natura 2000 managers Romania Natura 2000 Communication Competence Assessment 122 personnel from 24 organizations responsible for Natura 2000 sites in Romania April 2013 The analysis was conducted by Mike Appleton A set of competence statements aimed at staff at 3 levels as shown below: Level Description Level 4 Senior Management, Higher Technician Project, departmental management and/or high level technical responsibilities Level 3 Middle Management/Supervisor/Technician Supervisory/mid-level technical responsibilities Level 2 Craft, skilled worker Technical task based responsibilities with some team leadership CODE COMPETENCE LEVEL 2 : 2.1 Offer and request for feed-back or feed-forward, constructively and effectively 2.2 Demonstrate an assertive attitude and listen actively 2.3 Writing formal or informal e-mail, fax, letter 2.4 Writing formal or informal e-mail, fax, letter in other languages (at least English) - please specify in the last column the language 2.5 Understands very well the importance of the Natura 2000 site and its benefits for local communities CODE COMPETENCE LEVEL 2 2.6: Explains in a simple way the benefits of the Natura 2000 sites to locals and other stakeholders 2.7 Explains in a simple way the management measures needed for the efficient management of the Natura 2000 site 2.8 Explains in a simple way why specific regulations are needed for the management of land and natural resources in the Natura 2000 sites using support materials prepared by the site staff 2.9 Prepares and delivers simple presentations about the Natura 2000 site for educational purposes for schools, initiates interactive and attractive educational programmes CODE COMPETENCE LEVEL 3 3.1 Provide site specific technical/conservation information to the communication department, head of the PA and rangers in a way that helps them use the information when communicating with locals, children and other stakeholders 3.2 Prepares information on specific regulations needed for the management of land and natural resources in the Natura 2000 sites and how these help sustainable development in the region 3.3 Prepares information on the benefits of the Natura 2000 sites to locals and other stakeholders 3.4 Prepares materials / information for presentations about the Natura 2000 site for educational purposes for schools CODE COMPETENCE LEVEL 3 3.5 Work with mass media, on line and social media (press releases, press conferences, press trips, etc.) 3.6 Manage website, Facebook account, newsletters Develop the Natura 2000 communication plan involving the 3.7 management team, plans and coordinates the communication activities Collect/prepare and present to colleagues examples of 3.8 benefits in Natura 2000 sites to colleagues, locals and other stakeholders Prepare and deliver brief internal training events on how to 3.9 prepare presentations about the Natura 2000 sites and prepares and distributes to the team standard presentations as needed CODE COMPETENCE LEVEL 4 4.1 Coordinate and/or conduct communication activities with key stakeholders and high-level decision makers and entities, solving conflicts and seeking support. Having answered the personal questions, each respondent then assessed his or her competence for each statement as follows: 1 1 = I have little or no competence in this skill: I require extensive training and development 2 2 = I have some competence in this job. I require advanced training and development 3 3 = I have good competence in this job and only require periodic updating. 4 4 = I have high competence in this job and could train others to do it. 0 0 = This category of skills is not relevant to staff at this level The majority of respondents are in the middle management/technic al level. Very few respondents are field staff. This may be because most of the N2K sites do not employ site wardens or rangers. A high proportion of N2K personnel sites have quite limited experience of protected area management N2K site personnel have a generally high educational level with more than 80% having a university education. Staff at all levels have only received only average only about 1-1.5 days’ training in the past three years. This is inadequate considering their lack of experience and the complexity of managing N2K sites SELF ASSESSMENT RESULTS At all levels over 80% of the competence statements were considered by respondents to be relevant to their work. Overall, the competences reflect the requirements of the work. Despite the lack of experience and training, respondents at Level 4 are reasonably confident overall in the competence. However in this type of self-assessment Level 4 personnel tend to rate their competence more highly than other groups. At Level 3 confidence is much weaker, with nearly half of self-assessment at the weakest two levels. The table shows the proportions of self- assessments for each competence. This provides an indication of the strongest and weakest aspects CAPACITY CODE SELF ASSESSMENTS BY COMPETENCECOMPETENCE The table below shows the proportions of self-assessments for each competence.NEED INDEX N2KThis 3.9 providesPrepare anand indicationdeliver brief internal of the training strongest events onand how weakest to prepare aspectspresentations about the Natura 2000 sites and prepares and distributes to the team standard presentations as needed 49.0% N2K 3.7 Develop the Natura 2000 communication plan involving the management team, plans and coordinates the communication activities 48.0% N2K 3.8 Collect/prepare and present to colleagues examples of benefits in Natura 2000 sites to colleagues, locals and other stakeholders 44.9% N2K 2.7 Explains in a simple way the management measures needed for the efficient management of the Natura 2000 site 44.8% N2K 2.6 Explains in a simple way the benefits of the Natura 2000 sites to locals and other stakeholders 41.9% N2K 3.2 Prepares information on specific regulations needed for the management of land and natural resources in the Natura 2000 sites and how these help sustainable development in the region 41.8% N2K 2.4 Writing formal or informal e-mail, fax, letter in other languages (at least English) - please specify in the last column the language 41.0% N2K 2.8 Explains in a simple way why specific regulations are needed for the management of land and natural resources in the Natura 2000 sites using support materials prepared by the site staff 41.0% N2K 2.9 Prepares and delivers simple presentations about the Natura 2000 site for SELF ASSESSMENTS BY COMPETENCE The tableeducational below purposes shows for the schools, proportions initiates interactive of self- andassessments attractive educational for each competence. This providesprogrammes an indication of the strongest and weakest aspects 41.0% N2K 3.3 Prepares information on the benefits of the Natura 2000 sites to locals and other stakeholders 40.8% N2K 2.1 Offer and request for feed-back or feed-forward, constructively and effectively 40.0% N2K 3.5 Work with mass media, on line and social media (press releases, press conferences, press trips, etc.) 37.8% N2K 4.1 Coordinate and/or conduct communication activities with key stakeholders and high-level decision makers and entities, solving conflicts and seeking support. 36.5% N2K 2.5 Understands very well the importance of the Natura 2000 site and its benefits for local communities 36.2% N2K 3.4 Prepares materials / information for presentations about the Natura 2000 site for educational purposes for schools 33.7% N2K 3.6 Manage website, Facebook account, newsletters 32.7% N2K 3.1 Provide site specific technical/conservation information to the communication department, head of the PA and rangers in a way that helps them use the information when communicating with locals, children and other stakeholders 27.6% N2K 2.2 Demonstrate an assertive attitude and listen actively 24.8% N2K 2.3 Writing formal or informal e-mail, fax, letter 22.9% Three competences stand clear of the rest in terms of importance. and are related to internal communication processes within the management team. This suggests a need for teams to build their own capacity and competence for communication before working with stakeholders. The highest-ranking competence relates to development and delivery internal training of N2K site personnel to communicate N2K concepts to outsiders. LEVELS 3 AND 4 The second ranking competence highlights the need to develop internally a full communication plan for N2K sites The third ranking competence relates to internal communication of N2K values.
Recommended publications
  • Bitterling Populations in the Sighişoara-Târnava Mare Natura 2000 Site
    Management of Sustainable Development Sibiu, Romania, Volume 8, No.1, June 2016 10.1515/msd-2016-0001 BITTERLING POPULATIONS IN THE SIGHI ŞOARA-TÂRNAVA MARE NATURA 2000 SITE ‒ A SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT DECISIONS Angela, CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC 1, Ioana-Cristina, CISMA Ș2 and Doru, BĂNĂDUC 3 1"Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] 2"Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] 3"Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] ABSTRACT : The predominant threats to the Bitterling populations in the Sighi şoara-Târnava Mare Natura 2000 site are the hydro technical modifications of the river channels, organic contamination and illegal fishing. ADONIS:CE is applied commonly for business processes modelling, however, in this study case was applied in an ecology/biology sphere of interest. The authors acquired a Bitterling model which contained all of the identified habitat species’ necessities, the specific indicators that give good preservation status and the present pressures and threats. The keeping of the riverbed morphodynamics is especially necessary – the meanders existence is significant for the aquatic mollusc species which are existing in the inner U shape sectors of the lotic systems. The sectors, where the sand and mud are relatively fixed, give appropriate habitats for molluscs which is valuable for the reproduction of Bitterling. The preserving of the present water oxygenation and regime of liquid flows, and the prevention of the sediments deposition rate in the aquatic habitats are needed too for the molluscs’ existence. The sediments exploitation in these lotic systems should be realised in relation with the natural rate of renewal and at sites at a distance over five km between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Degradation of Geoecological and Hydrological Conditions Due to Grazing in South Carpathian Mountains Under the Influence of Changing Social Structure in Romania
    Geographical Review of Japan Vol.80, No.5, 272-289, 2007 Degradation of Geoecological and Hydrological Conditions due to Grazing in South Carpathian Mountains under the Influence of Changing Social Structure in Romania URUSHIBARA-YOSHINO Kazuko* and MORI Kazuki** *DepartmentofGeography, Hosei University, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8160, Japan **DepartmentofGeosystem Sciences, Nihon University, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8550, Japan Abstract:This study tried to clarify theecological damage in the areas of sheep transhumance, afterthe regime change of 1989, in the South Carpathian Mts. of Romania. The number of sheep increasedby a factoroften per hectare inareas where transhumance waspracticed inthe South CarpathianMountains. This was because the sheep cheese produced in this area became more popularand increased inprice. Jina and Poiana Sibiului villages arelocated on thethird pene- plain(900-1000m a.s.l.) ofthe Southern Carpathian Mountains, which consists ofcrystalline schistofPrecambrian origin. Soil erosion of commonlands and water pollution caused by the transhumanceofsheep is a seriousproblem in these villages. Soilerosion speeds were measured by comparingprofiles on Sept. 20,2003, and Sept. 6,2004. Soil erosion inthese transhumance areasprogressed more during that one year. The bedrock is extremely hard and the recovery of soiland vegetation willprobably be difficultoverthe short term. In Patarlagele, wheresoils were composedof Miocene marl, soil erosion was very prevalent and easily progressed. However, the recoveryofsoils and vegetation wasfaster than in Jina and Poiana Sibiului, because of the softer andyounger mother rock. In Jina and Poiana Sibiului, theRoma andBayash people have been washingwool in the creeks. The water was seriously polluted asa result.Results ofa chemical analysisshowed high sodium, potassium and bicarbonate levels after wool washing.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Populations in Oltul Mijlociu – Cibin – Hârtibaciu Natura 2000 Site (Romania)
    Management of Sustainable Development Sibiu, Romania, Volume 6, No.2, December 2014 DOI 10.1515/msd-2015-0005 MANAGEMENT DECISIONS SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR RHODEUS AMARUS (BLOCH, 1782) SPECIES POPULATIONS IN OLTUL MIJLOCIU – CIBIN – HÂRTIBACIU NATURA 2000 SITE (ROMANIA) Doru, B ĂNĂDUC 1, Ioana-Cristina, CISMA Ș2, Teodora, TRICHKOVA 3 and Angela, CURTEAN- BĂNĂDUC 4 1 "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] 2 "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] 3 Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 4 "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, [email protected] ABSTRACT : The main threats to the Rhodeus amarus (Bloch, 1782) populations in the Natura 2000 site Oltul Mijlociu – Cibin – Hârtibaciu are the hydro technical modifications of the riverbeds, chemical pollution and poachery. ADONIS:CE is used in general for modeling business processes, but here was used in ecology/biology domain. The authors obtained a Rhodeus amarus model which included all the habitat species requirements, the indicators that provide favourable conservation status and the existing threats and pressures. The maintaining of the minor riverbed morphodynamics is very important – the meanders presence is very important for the local molluscs which are living in the inner U shape parts of the river. The places, where the sediments (sand, mud) are relatively stable, provide suitable habitats for molluscs important for the breeding of Rhodeus amarus. The maintaining of the actual regimes of liquid flows and oxygenation, and the avoidance of increasing of the sediments deposition rate in the water are necessary also for those molluscs species presence conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Foaie De Gardă
    ACTUALIZAREPLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL P.U.G. –C O M U N AG U R AR Â U L U I,JUD. SIBIU B.I.A. MARCELA MARIA IOAN|Rm. Valcea|tel./fax: 0350 807951 |e-mail: [email protected] FOAIE DE GARDĂ 1 ACTUALIZAREPLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL P.U.G. –C O M U N AG U R AR Â U L U I,JUD. SIBIU B.I.A. MARCELA MARIA IOAN|Rm. Valcea|tel./fax: 0350 807951 |e-mail: [email protected] BORDEROU DE PIESE SCRISE Foaiedegarda Colectivelaborareproiect Borderoupiese scrise Memoriu general ACTUALIZARE P.U.G. COMUNAGURARÂULUI JUDEȚUL SIBIU Regulament Local de Urbanism ACTUALIZARE P.U.G. COMUNAGURARÂULUI JUDEȚUL SIBIU Documentatie suport topografic 2 ACTUALIZAREPLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL P.U.G. –C O M U N AG U R AR Â U L U I,JUD. SIBIU B.I.A. MARCELA MARIA IOAN|Rm. Valcea|tel./fax: 0350 807951 |e-mail: [email protected] MEMORIUGENERAL 1. INTRODUCERE 1.1. DATE DE RECUNOAȘTERE A DOCUMENTAȚIEI Denumirea lucrării: PLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL (P.U.G.) COMUNA GURA RÂULUI, JUD.SIBIU Beneficiar: COMUNAGURA RÂULUI, JUD. SIBIU Proiectant general: BIROU INDIVIDUAL DE ARHIETCTURA MARCELA MARIA IOAN RM.VÂLCEA, JUDEȚUL VÂLCEA Data elaborării: 2013 1.2. OBIECTUL LUCRĂRII Planul Urbanistic General este documentaţia care stabileşte obiectivele, acţiunile şi măsurile de dezvoltare pentru o localitate existentă sau viitoare pe o perioadă determinată, pe baza analizei multicriteriale a situaţiei existente.Acesta orientează aplicarea unor politici socio-economice si a strategiilor de dezvoltare sustenabila aferente,în scopul construirii şi amenajării teritoriului
    [Show full text]
  • Elaborare Strategiei De Vizitare Necesare Pentru
    Elaborare strategiei de vizitare necesare pentru accesarea de fonduri in vederea realizarii unei infrastructuri de management in cadrul proiectului : « Pentru Natura si Comunitati Locale - Bazele unui management integrat Natura 2000 in zona Hartibaciu-Tarnava Mare-Olt » Pentru ASOCIATIA WWF-PROGRAMUL DUNARE-CARPATI ROMANIA Détente Consultants Page 1 of 61 FAZA 1 Diagnosticarea ofertei/amenajarii turistice a zonei Détente Consultants Page 2 of 61 1 - CONTEXTUL............................................................................................................................................5 2 - CARACTERISTICILE ZONEI.................................................................................................................6 2.1 - RELIEF ......................................................................................................................................................6 2.2 - SOLURILE..................................................................................................................................................7 2.3 - CLIMA .......................................................................................................................................................8 2.4 - HIDROLOGIE .............................................................................................................................................8 3 - ANALIZA FACTORILOR DE ATRAGERE IN ZONA.........................................................................9 3.1 - POTENTIALUL NATURAL AL ZONEI .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oltul Mijlociu - Cibin - Hârtibaciu
    FORMULARUL STANDARD NATURA 2000 1. IDENTIFICAREA SITULUI 1.8 Datele indicrii i desemnrii/clasificrii sitului 1.3 Data 1.4 Data Data propunerii Data confirmrii Data confirmrii Data desemnrii 1.1 Tip 1.2 Codul sitului completrii actualizrii ca sit SCI ca sit SCI ca sit SPA: ca sit SAC K ROSCI0132 200612 201101 200706 200812 1.5 Legturi cu alte situri Natura 2000: J ROSPA0003 Avrig - Scorei - Fgra F ROSPA0099 Podisul Hârtibaciului 1.6 Responsabili Grupul de lucru Natura2000 1.7 NUMELE SITULUI : Oltul Mijlociu - Cibin - Hârtibaciu 2. LOCALIZAREA SITULUI 2.1. Coordonatele sitului 2.2. Suprafaa 2.3. Lungimea 2.4. Altitudine (m) 2.6. Regiunea biogeografic Latitudine Longitudine sitului (ha) sitului (km) Min. Max. Med. Alpin Continental Panonic Stepic Pontic N 45º 40' 58'' E 24º 19' 28'' 2.826 314 568 416 X X 2.5 Regiunile administrative NUTS % Numele judeului RO076 66 Sibiu RO072 25 Braov RO045 9 Vâlcea 3.1. Tipuri de habitate prezente în sit i evaluarea sitului în ceea ce le privete Cod Denumire habitat % Reprez. Supr. rel. Conserv.Global 4060 Tufriuri alpine i boreale 0,001 C C C C 9110 Pduri de fag de tip Luzulo-Fagetum 2 C C C C 3.2.c. Specii de mamifere enumerate în anexa II a Directivei Consiliului 92/43/CEE Cod Specie Populaie: Rezident Reproducere Iernat Pasaj Sit Pop. Conserv. Izolare Global 1355 Lutra lutra P C B C B 1337 Castor fiber 40-60 i C C C B C B 3.2.d. Specii de amfibieni i reptile enumerate în anexa II a Directivei Consiliului 92/43/CEE Cod Specie Populaie: Rezident Reproducere Iernat Pasaj Sit Pop.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuitul Ecomuzeu În Gura Rîului
    ROMÂNIA-JUDEŢULSIBIU AsociaţiadeÎnfrumuseţare acomuneiGuraR î ului CIRCUITULECOMUZEU ÎN GURARÎULUI -micromonografie pentruîncurajareaturismului- „şipâmântulafostformatdinapăşidecătreapă” VIZITAŢI GURARÎULUI! Materialpromoţional- micromonografie-realizatprin proiectul “ CIVILIZAŢIA APEIÎNMĂRGINIMEA SIBIULUI” proiectimplementatcufondurieuropenenerambursabile prinP.N.D.R.-axaIV LEADER-G.A.L. MărginimeaSibiului Lucrareas-arealizatprintr-unprocesparticipativpuncteledevedereexprimate nereflectândîn modobligatoriuopiniilefiecăruiautor/coautor. Proiectulcontribuielapromovarea şipunereaînvaloarea patrimoniuluimaterial şiimaterialalcomuneiGuraRîului şi, îngeneralaMărginimiiSibiului, prinvalorificareaprincipiilor şitehnicilordeanaliză aecomuzeuluisibian. Echipadeimplementareproiectreprezentantlegal preşedinteMihaelaStoica, împreună cumembriifondatoriaiasociaţiei IoanDuţu,MariusHalmaghi Aucolaboratlarealizarealucrării: dr.EugenStrăuţiu,dr.VasileCrişan,dr.OvidiuCalborean dr.ClaudiuMunteanu,col.PăreanIoan ValerDeleanu,NicolaeHanzu Foto:OctavianIsailă (fotografiiaeriene) şifotografiidincolecţiile Ecomuzeului Traduceri(germană -franceză -engleză):HildegardFalk, AlinChipăilă,IoanaBratu © Toatedrepturileasupraacesteiversiuniaparţin AsociaţieideÎnfrumuseţareaComuneiGuraRîului www.civilizatiaapei .ro DescriereaCIP aBiblioteciiNaţionaleaRomâniei CircuitulecomuzeuînGuraRîului.-Sibiu:CasadePresă şiEditură Tribuna,2015 Bibliogr. ISBN978-973-7749-77-2 398(498GuraRîului) “Acestmaterialpromo ţionalsedistribuiegratuit” CasadePresăşiEditurăTRIBUNA Sibiu ISBN978-973-7749-77-
    [Show full text]
  • 3-Mai-2017.Pdf
    ADMINISTRAŢIA NAŢIONALĂ “APELE ROMÂNE” SISTEMUL DE GOSPODĂRIRE A APELOR SIBIU Str. Autogării, nr. 10, cod 550135, Sibiu, Sibiu, ROMÂNIA, Tel: 0269 236726; Fax: 0269 233660, e-mail: [email protected] COD FISCAL: RO23730128; COD IBAN: RO82 TREZ 5765 025X XX00 8189 nr. ______/BMS/ 25.05.2017, comp.DAII e-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] MONITORIZAREA NUTRIEN ŢILOR DIN RESURSELE DE APĂ ÎN JUDE ȚUL SIBIU http://www.rowater.ro I. ASPECTECOD FISCAL: GENERALE R 18207646/12.12.2005; PRIVIND COD IBAN: RO 93 TREZ 7005 025X XX00 1176 SISTEMUL DE GOSPODĂRIRE A APELOR SIBIU Apa a fost şi este un element central în viaţa societăţii umane, aşezările şi civilizaţia înflorind în prezenţa resurselor de apă şi pierind adesea odată cu dispariţia sau degradarea acestora. Apa poate fi mijloc şi obiect de muncă, este o resursă reînnoibilă, dar de neînlocuit. În cursul anului 2016, Sistemul De Gospodărire a Apelor Sibiu şi-a desfăşurat activitatea în concordanţă cu Programul de Guvernare 2013 – 2016, după cum urmează: - cunoaşterea, administrarea, gestionarea cantitativă şi calitativă precum şi valorificarea economică a resurselor de apă de suprafaţă şi subterană din bazinul hidrografic Olt, jud Sibiu; - administrarea, exploatarea şi întreţinerea infrastructurii de gospodărire a apelor, a reţelei de hidrologie şi hidrogeologie; - organizarea activităţii de protecţie împotriva epuizării şi degradării apelor de suprafaţă şi subterane; - organizarea activităţii de prevenire şi apărare împotriva acţiunilor
    [Show full text]
  • Raport De Mediu Pt PUG ORLAT
    RAPORT DE MEDIU pentru PLAN URBANISTIC GENERAL ȘI REGULAMENT LOCAL DE URBANISM COMUNA ORLAT, JUDEȚUL SIBIU (satul Orlat) Titular: PRIMĂRIA COMUNEI ORLAT Adresa: P-ța Avram Iancu, nr. 202, loc. Orlat, jud. Sibiu Tel.: 0269 571104 Fax: 0269 571104 E-mail: [email protected] Elaborat de: S.C. ECO TERRA S.R.L. drd. ecol. Miclausu Camelia Adresa: loc. Cisnadie, str. Constantin Lepadatu, -înscrisă în Registrul Național al nr. 37C, jud. Sibiu Elaboratorilor de Studii pentru Tel. mobil: 0769 628880 Protecția Mediului la nr. 149 E-mail: [email protected] RM – PUG comuna Orlat, jud. Sibiu octombrie 2018 CUPRINS Lista prescurtărilor........................................................................................................ 4 Glosar de termeni și expresii ....................................................................................... 5 1. CERINȚE LEGALE PRIVIND ELABORAREA PUG și A RM ..................................... 6 2. PREZENTAREA PLANULUI URBANISTIC GENERAL AL COMUNEI ORLAT ........ 7 2.1. Conținutul și obiectivele principale ale PUG ................................................... 7 2.2. Relația PUG cu alte programe și planuri relevante ........................................ 42 2.3. Prezentarea opțiunilor relevante identificate; alternative față de cele conținute în PUG, inclusiv alternativa „zero” ....................................................... 50 3. ASPECTE RELEVANTE ALE STĂRII ACTUALE A MEDIULUI ............................... 52 3.1. Starea factorilor de mediu ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civilizaţia Apei În GuraRîului
    ROMÂNIA-JUDEŢULSIBIU AsociaţiadeÎnfrumuseţare acomuneiGuraR î ului CIVILIZAŢIA APEI ÎN GURARÎULUI -micromonografie pentruîncurajareaturismului- „şipâmântulafostformatdinapăşidecătreapă” VIZITAŢI GURARÎULUI! Materialpromoţional- micromonografie-realizatprin proiectul “ CIVILIZAŢIA APEIÎNMĂRGINIMEA SIBIULUI” proiectimplementatcufondurieuropenenerambursabile prinP.N.D.R.-axaIV LEADER-G.A.L. MărginimeaSibiului Lucrareas-arealizatprintr-unprocesparticipativpuncteledevedereexprimate nereflectândîn modobligatoriuopiniilefiecăruiautor/coautor. Proiectulcontribuielapromovarea şipunereaînvaloarea patrimoniuluimaterial şiimaterialalcomuneiGuraRîului şi, îngeneralaMărginimiiSibiului, prinvalorificareaprincipiilor şitehnicilordeanaliză aecomuzeuluisibian. Echipadeimplementareproiectreprezentantlegal preşedinteMihaelaStoica, împreună cumembriifondatoriaiasociaţiei IoanDuţu,MariusHalmaghi Aucolaboratlarealizarealucrării: dr.EugenStrăuţiu,dr.VasileCrişan,dr.OvidiuCalborean dr.ClaudiuMunteanu,col.PăreanIoan ValerDeleanu,NicolaeHanzu Foto:OctavianIsailă (fotografiiaeriene) şifotografiidincolecţiile Ecomuzeului Traduceri(germană -franceză -engleză):HildegardFalk, AlinChipăilă,IoanaBratu © Toatedrepturileasupraacesteiversiuniaparţin AsociaţieideÎnfrumuseţareaComuneiGuraRîului www.civilizatiaapei .ro DescriereaCIP aBiblioteciiNaţionaleaRomâniei CivilizaţiaapeiînGuraRîului:micromonografiepentru încurajareaturismului.- Sibiu:CasadePresăşiEditură Tribuna,2015 Bibliogr. ISBN978-973-7749-76-5 908(498GuraRîului) “Acestmaterialpromo ţionalsedistribuiegratuit” CasadePresăşiEditurăTRIBUNA
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of the Trust
    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 16.2 (2014), "The Wetlands Diversity" 139 ZINGEL ZINGEL (LINNAEUS, 1766) ON SITE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS SUPPORT SYSTEM - STUDY CASE Doru BĂNĂDUC *, Cristina-Ioana CISMAŞ ** and Angela CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC *** * “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, Dr. Ion Raţiu Street 5-7, Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania, RO-550012, [email protected] ** “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, Dr. Ion Raţiu Street 5-7, Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania, RO-550012, [email protected] *** “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, Dr. Ion Raţiu Street 5-7, Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania, RO-550012, [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0023 KEYWORDS: Zingel zingel, Natura 2000 SCI, Transylvania, Romania, pressures, threats, community interest fish species habitat necessities, management elements. ABSTRACT The ADONIS:CE was utilised here, in the biology/ecology domain, to produce a framework management model of Zingel zingel fish species based on this species’ identified needs, regarding: the habitat, the indicators which reveal the favourable conservation status and the proper measures, and the identified pressures and threats on this fish species. If these suggested management elements will not be implemented in ROSCI0132, the presence of the Zingel zingel species will be endangered in the next one or two decades. Such management systems, based on: the site, the habitats and on numerous species should be implemented in the conservative interest Natura 2000 case of ROSCI0132.
    [Show full text]
  • Anexa Nr. 16 Lista Principalilor Utilizatori De Apa Care Pot Polua
    ANEXA NR. 16 LA PAAR LISTA PRINCIPALILOR UTILIZATORI DE AP Ă CARE POT PREZENTA SURSE POTEN ŢIALE SEMNIFICATIVE DE POLU ĂRI ACCIDENTALE Nr. Denumirea utilizatorului de ap ă Adresa Num ăr de telefon Num ăr fax Poluna ţi periculo şi Folosin ţe de apa principale din aval care crt. posibil a fi sc ăpa ţi pot fi afectate de sub control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sibiu Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Fax: 0269/223468 Eschil, nr. 6 Ape uzate Curs de apa Cibin 2. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Fax: 0269/223468 Produse Cristian Eschil, nr. 6 petroliere, ape Curs de apa Cibin uzate, namol 3. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Fax: 0269/223468 Avrig Eschil, nr. 6 Ape uzate Curs de apa Avrig 4. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Şura Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Fax: 0269/223468 Mic ă Eschil, nr. 6 Ape uzate Curs de apa p. Şura Mic ă 5. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Fax: 0269/223468 Cisn ădie Eschil, nr. 6 Ape uzate Curs de apa Cisn ădie 6. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Păltini ş Eschil, nr. 6 Fax: 0269/223468 Ape menajere Pârâu D ăneasa 7. SC Ap ă Canal SA – sector Sadu Sibiu, str. 0269/222916;218696 Eschil, nr. 6 Fax: 0269/223468 Ape uzate Curs de apa Sadu 8. S.C. Apa Media ş- str.
    [Show full text]