Session I Learning and Accessing EU Law: Some Best Practices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS THE TRAINING OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS: TEACHING EU LAW AND JUDGECRAFT Session I Learning and accessing EU law: Some best practices COMPILATION OF BRIEFING NOTES WORKSHOP ON JUDICIAL TRAINING Thursday, 28 November 2013 ASP 3 E 2 – EP, Brussels PE 493.022 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committees on Legal Affairs and on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATORS Rosa RAFFAELLI Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Udo BUX Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Marcia MAGUIRE Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] European Parliament, manuscript completed in November 2013. © European Union, Brussels, 2013 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Workshop on Judicial Training – Session I – Learning and accessing EU law: some best practices _____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 TRAINING JUDGES IN EU LAW AND IMPROVING ITS ACCESSIBILITY THE EURINFRA PROJECT 6 Reinier VAN ZUTPHEN THE SENSE OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE, JUDGECRAFT AND AUTONOMY: A DUTCH NARRATIVE 11 Rosa JANSEN; Herman VAN HARTEN THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE: "SCUOLA SUPERIORE DELLA MAGISTRATURA" 30 Valerio ONIDA THE SPANISH EXPERIENCE: NETWORK OF EXPERTS ON EUROPEAN UNION LAW (REDUE) - INITIAL & CONTINUOUS TRAINING 36 Fernando DE ROSA TORNER THE FRENCH EXPERIENCE: ECOLE NATIONALE DE LA MAGISTRATURE 59 Xavier RONSIN THE TRAINING OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS: THE BELGIAN EXPERIENCE 70 Edith VAN DEN BROECK THE POLISH EXPERIENCE AND BEST PRACTICES WORKED OUT ON THE TRAINING OF JUDGES IN EU LAW AND IMPROVING ITS ACCESSIBILITY 84 Wojciech POSTULSKI THE TEACHING OF EUROPEAN LAW AT THE GERMAN JUDICIAL ACADEMY: PRACTICE-ORIENTED CROSS-LINKING OF EU LAW AND NATIONAL LAW 101 Rainer HORNUNG TRAINING OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN HUNGARY 117 Katalin KISZELY THE ACADEMY OF EUROPEAN LAW (ERA) EXPERIENCE WITH JUDICIAL TRAINING 126 Wolfgang HEUSEL; John COUGHLAN and Jean-Philippe RAGEADE BEST PRACTICES IN JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS TRAINING 147 Jeremy COOPER TRAINING LEGAL PRACTITIONERS TRAINING OF LAWYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 161 Jonathan GOLDSMITH; Sieglinde GAMSJÄGER and Alonso HERNÁNDEZ-PINZÓN GARCIA TRAINING OF COURT STAFF 172 Amélie LECLERCQ 3 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CCBE Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe CEPEJ Commission européenne pour l’efficacité de la justice (European Commission for the Efficience of Justice) CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CNEU Council of the Notaries of the European Union CoE Council of Europe CSM Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura (High Council of the Judiciary) DG Justice European Commission Directorate-General for Justice DRA Deutsche Richterakademie (German Judicial Academy) EAW European Arrest Warrant ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECJ Court of Justice of European Union ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EIPA European Institute for Public Administration EJN European Judicial Network EJTN European Judicial Training Network ENCJ The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary ENM French National School for the Judiciary EP European Parliament ERA European Law Academy ETP European Training Platform EU European Union FMoJ German Federal Ministry of Justice 4 Workshop on Judicial Training – Session I – Learning and accessing EU law: some best practices _____________________________________________________________________________________________ GJA German Judicial Academy JAT Justice Academy of Turkey KSSiP National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution, Krakow MS Member States TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 5 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _____________________________________________________________________________________________ THE EURINFRA PROJECT Reinier VAN ZUTPHEN President of the Administrative High Court for Trade and Industry in the Hague (NL); Chairperson of the EURINFRA Project and the Dutch Network of Court Coordinators European Law ABSTRACT This paper gives a short overview of the Eurinfra project, as implemented in The Netherlands. It starts with a historical perspective and continues to explain how the project has been implemented though the network of Court Coordinators in European law. Finally, it describes how Eurinfra can evolve into a truly European project. CONTENT SUMMARY 7 1. THE OLD DAYS 8 2. DO JUDGES KNOW EUROPEAN LAW? 8 3. WHERE DOES THE DUTCH CCE NETWORK STAND TODAY? 8 4. WHAT IS NEEDED TO SUCCESSFULLY REINVENT EURINFRA AND ITS CCE NETWORK? 9 5. IS THIS JUST A DREAM? 10 6. AND WHAT NOW? 10 6 Workshop on Judicial Training – Session I – Learning and accessing EU law: some best practices _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY In this short paper I will give some historic background on the creation of the Dutch Eurinfra project, its functioning, and the challenges for the years to come and the need for new developments in the ever faster changing world in which European law plays an increasing role in the Member States of the European Union and its judiciaries. The Eurinfra project was launched in 2000 with the objective of improving knowledge of European law within the Dutch Judiciary. The main objectives were to improve accessibility of the sources of information related to European law through web technology, improve knowledge of European law among Dutch judges and support, establish and maintain a network of court coordinators in European law (CCEs). These objectives have not changed over the years. However, the number of Member States of the European Union has increased significantly since the year 2000 and the various Treaty amendments have broadened the competences of the European Union so that, in addition to the well-known fields in which European law is applicable, EU law has become of great importance also in civil law, family law, criminal law and asylum law. Of even greater importance is probably the entering into force of the Charter of Fundamental rights. In practice, we must acknowledge that today European (Union) law is for all judges as important as their national law and that the two form indeed one integrated set of rules. Judges must realize that deciding cases can’t be properly done without at least a basic knowledge and understanding of European law. Applying European law is no longer the exception but the normal way of handling cases. The number of cases in which there is a cross border element has increased hand in hand with the growing number of Member States. This all demands a new approach for the Eurinfra project. Members of the CCE-network can no longer be specialists in all fields of substantive European law, as it was the case in the old days. Moreover, they need networking skills, must master at least one or two foreign languages in order to have access to the case law of national courts in other Member States, and must be able (among many other competences) to use modern technologies such as video-conferencing, Skype, e-learning and virtual networking. The Dutch network is at this very moment reinventing itself in such a way that the network will be composed not only of judges (the coordinators) but also of colleagues from the Dutch Training Center for the Judiciary and from the staff departments that work on knowledge-management. In various other Member States we see similar developments and it is the serious intention of these national CCE-networks to unite and work closely together improving the application of European law, bringing it to a high level of quality, and thus ensuring that the effectiveness of European Union law is safeguarded throughout the Union. To be successful, it is of the greatest importance that the networks and its members are supported by the presidents of courts and councils for the judiciary (or similar bodies) in the Member States. Time and money must be available or be made available to ensure the proper functioning of the networks and thus of the European Judiciary. Support from the European Union Institutions is paramount. More specific support is needed for the establishment of a Union-wide network. 7 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. THE OLD DAYS Years ago, European law was considered to be a separated part of the law, relevant only for specialists.