DOCSLIB.ORG

One Hundred Years Ofold Testament Interpretation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
One Hundred Years Ofold Testament Interpretation ONE HUNDRED YEARS OFOLD TESTAMENT INTERPRETATION Ronald E. Clements 0 \\ The Westminster Press Philadelphia Copyright 0 Ronald E. Clements 1976 Published in Great Britain under the title A Century of Old Testament Study PUBLISHED BY THE WESTMINSTER PRESS @ Philadelphia, Pennsylvania PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 9 8 ‘7 6 5 4 3 2 Contents Preface vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Interpreting the Pentateuch 7 To Gillian and Marian 3. Interpreting the Historical Books 31 4. Interpreting the Prophets 51 5. Interpreting the Psalms 76 6. Interpreting the Wisdom Literature 99 7. Interpreting Old Testament Theology 118 8. Retrospect and Prospect 141 Index of Authors 151 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Clements, Ronald Ernest, 1929- One hundred years of Old Testament interpretation. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Bible. O.T. - Criticism, interpretation, etc. - History - 19th century. 2. Bible. O.T. - Criticism, interpretation, etc. - History - 20th century. I. Title. BSl16O.C56 1976 221.6’6 76-23236 ISBN O-664-24747-4 List of Journals and Series ATANT Abhandlungen zur Theologie des Alten und Neuen Testa- ments BA The Biblical Archaeologist BIGIT Bib&he Kommentar, Altes Testament Preface B WANT Beitrlge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testa- ment BZA W Beihefte zur ZAW The following work requires some explanation as to its purpose since it is neither an introduction to the Old Testament in the accepted sense FRLANT Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und nor a comprehensive history of the ways in which the Old Testament Neuen Testamentes has been interpreted since Wellhausen. It is no more than a sketch of the latter, and to have attempted the larger task would have required a HAT Handbuch zum Alten Testament volume much greater in size than I have been able to offer. My aim has been to provide the student and general reader with some picture of the HKAT Handkommentar zum Alten Testament main lines of interpretation which have affected the study of the Old Testament, with a particular emphasis upon questions of methodology. JBL Journal of Biblical Literature In doing this I have concentrated upon the work of a few scholars whose contributions appear to me to have been particularly significant and in- KHAT Kurzer Hand-Commentar zum Alten Testament teresting in this respect. I have also endeavoured where possible to show some of the inter-connections which relate the work of various SAT Die Schriften des Alten Testaments in Auswahl scholars to each other. Within each of the chapters which deal with the main sections of the Old Testament canon I have endeavoured to main- SBT Studies in Biblical Theology tain a broadly chronological outline of development. Two major departments of the study and interpretation of the Old Th.B. Theologische Biicherei Testament have been almost entirely left out of my treatment. One of these is the linguistic and philological examination of the text and Th.Z. Theologische Zeitschrift language of the literature and the other is that of Palestinian and Near Eastern archaeology. For these omissions I would wish to venture the WMANT Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen following reasons, besides my own lack of competence in these Testament specialized fields. One is that both fields of research affect the entire Old Testament, so that to consider them would have required a separate ZAW Zeitschrift fiir die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft section in each of my main chapter divisions. The other is that each of vii these departments of study has grown so enormously in the past century that they properly require separate treatments of their own if they are to be described in a sufficiently meaningful way. For practical reasons I have kept footnotes to a minimum and references to literature to what is essential for a proper understanding of the chronological perspective. I hope I have provided enough informa- tion for the reader to be able to find some further treatments of the main issues that are discussed. That my selection of developments may appear somewhat arbitrary has been unavoidable in order to keep the 1 work within a reasonable length. I have also found it necessary at times to indicate where I think scholars have been wrong, without being able to set out all the reasons for my doing so. Undesirable as this is, it seems Introduction to me preferable to making the survey no more than a catalogue which remains neutral in its conclusions. I hope that the reader who is unable to accept my judgements will at least see the point of them. My indebtedness to other scholars should be apparent throughout the The years since 1870 have witnessed an immense scholarly involvement book, although I have avoided so far as I have been able to do so the in the study and interpretation of the Old Testament, closely matching repetition of discussions and surveys which are readily available in in effort and range that devoted to the study of the New. Both other volumes. It remains for me to express my particular thanks to Dr Christians and Jews, as well as historians and orientalists who have ad- Cecil Northcott of the Lutterworth Press for his kindness in suggesting mitted allegiance to neither faith, have been intensively occupied with that I should write this book. sifting the documents, searching out relevant parallels, and repeatedly asking how, when, and why this literature came into existence. Since R. E. Clements the beginning of the Christian era the Old Testament has been used and 1976 read in substantially the same form as that in which it exists today, and its earliest literary sources go back approximately a millennium more. The reasons which led to the quest for a fresh critical understanding of the origins and significance of the Old Testament are certainly to be traced to the years before 1870, and most of the methods and tools of literary and historical scholarship had already become available, and had been tested, by this time. In fact many of the conclusions about the structure and origin of the Old Testament which broke so disturbingly upon the Church and the world in the next decade through the writings in Germany of such scholars as J. Wellhausen and B. Duhm, were cer- tainly not entirely novel or unprecedented. In a great many respects they represented a refinement and consolidation of views that had been propounded for a number of years. What was new was the strength of the case that was now being eagerly canvassed for a fresh critical ac- count of the historical rise of Israel and its religion, and the clarity with which the case was now presented. It made a warm appeal to a wide cir- cle of competent scholarship who were readily able to examine the . Vlll evidence on which it was based. In the minds of the leading exponents of In recent years it has frequently been widely claimed that a cloud of this higher criticism, as this study came to be called, it was clearly felt suspicion and error hangs over the pioneers of the newer criticism of the that no one had anything to fear from its new truth. Faith would not be Old Testament on account of their particular theological and overthrown, but rather strengthened, and given a new and more solid philosophical presuppositions. Most especially the purported foundation on which to rest. Knowledge of the historical facts about the Hegelianism of Wellhausen has been alleged to constitute a serious origin of the Old Testament, and the Israelite religion from which it had weakness, and to show that the fundamental assumptions of this in- emerged, would provide a sure foundation upon which faith could build. tellectual enterprise were mistaken. Such a claim can only be main- Hence in the writings of the new generation of critical scholars there tained by substantially disregarding the facts, and by looking away from is to be found an evangelical fervour about the manner with which the the actual evidence adduced by these scholars in support of their views. new insights were publicized and presented. Where breaks were sharply This is not to say, of course, that they were altogether without presup- made with traditional Christian and Jewish views about the Old Testa- positions, which would undoubtedly have required that they should ment there was felt to be a welcome deliverance from hampering bonds have ceased to be children of their own time. A. Kuenen, the dis- and new and more lasting ties made with truth, morality and piety in a tinguished Dutch scholar whose work on the history of Israelite religion broad human setting. Where the older Christian view of the Old Testa- stands out as a major achievement of pioneering critical work on the Old ment as a book of ancient prophecies about the coming of Jesus Christ Testament,4 displays a note of rationalism which cannot be entirely was being set aside, it was felt that it was nevertheless being replaced by denied. So also W. Robertson Smith’s attraction to Kuenen’s work a fresh and more scholarly apologetic which showed that in the Old lends to his own writings something of the same colour. Furthermore Testament were to be found the moral and spiritual foundations of a un- we cannot deny features in Wellhausen’s assessment of Israel’s religion iversal religion. This found in Jesus Christ the fullest embodiment of its which betray touches of philosophical idealism reminiscent of Hegel. own earnestness. That WelIhausen was drawn to the earlier work of Wilhelm Vatke on As far as Great Britain was concerned this new religious enthusiasm Old Testament theology, which was quite markedly Hegelian in its for the critical approach to the Old Testament is well illustrated in the views, is also not to be denied.5 Yet all these factors in no way amount to writings of W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Sing a New Song: New Perspectives for Doing Old Testament Theology Professor Robert K
    To Sing a New Song: New Perspectives for Doing Old Testament Theology Professor Robert K. Gnuse In the past fifteen years Old Testament scholars have critically assessed existing paradigms used not only in scholarly research but also in our textbooks and found them to be wanting. In this period of scholarly ferment one cannot be too sure where the new scholarly paradigms will take us, but a new consensus seems to be emerging on a number of issues, some of which may have significant implications for how Christians and Jews draw forth theological and religious meanings from the biblical texts. Two areas of study in Old Testament research have drawn the attention of this author for the past ten years: first, how archaeologists have begun to interpret the process by which the Israelites "conquered" Palestine; and second, how historians of Israelite religion have begun to portray the emergence of monotheism among the Israelites. Many biblical theologians have taken their cue for the creation of biblical or Old Testament theologies from an understanding of these two aspects of Israelite existence. The emergence of new scholarly understandings will cause biblical theologians perhaps to fine tune their explications and stress different nuances in the future. This paper is designed to be a tentative probe in articulating what might be the themes that biblical theologians will stress in the future as they reflect upon the biblical literature of the Old Testament or Hebrew canon. I shall first make some general observations about the nature of biblical theology in the Old Testament. Then a brief summary will be made of some of the significant new directions taken by scholarship in the discussions about the nature of the Israelite conquest and emerging monotheism.
    [Show full text]
  • VINCENT TAYLOR Has Written: "By General Consent 'The Logos', Or
    THE WORD OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT JOHN L. MCKENZIE, SJ. West Baden College INCENT TAYLOR has written: "By general consent 'the Logos', or V'the Word', is one of the greatest titles applied to Christ in the New Testament. Many would say that it is the sublimest title of all. The name is used only by St. John, in the Prologue to the Gospel, i. 1-18 and in the opening words of the First Epistle, i. 1-4; but its ideas colour the teaching of St. Paul in Col. i. 15-20 and of the writer of Hebrews in Heb. i. 1-3."1 The purpose of this article is to synthesize the OT usage of the divine word which is the background of the appli­ cation of the term to Jesus; it is hoped that theologians will find such a synthesis useful. I believe that the background, while complex, is extraordinarily rich and fruitful.2 THE DIVINE WORD IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST In tracing the pattern and growth of any OT idea, it is necessary to see whether the idea has roots in the older cultures of the Near East; from such a comparison alone is it possible to determine the degree to which the Hebrew idea is original. Oskar Grether and L. Dürr called attention to Mesopotamian uses of the phrase which are similar in conception and form to some OT passages.3 The following passages will illustrate this usage. From a hymn to the moon-god Sin: Thou! When thy word is pronounced in heaven the Igigi prostrate themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellhausenism Evaluated After a Century of Influence
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY .,+;*. Volume 43, Number 2 APRIL 1979 Wellhausenism Evaluated After A Century Of Influence .....................Raymond F. Surburg 78 Sing a New Song ...................................ArmandJ. Boehme 96 God's Here and Is Not Silent ..........................................Philip M. Bickel 120 Theological Observer .......................................................... 1 2 1 Homiletical Studies ............................................................. 124 Book Reviews ..................................................................... 157 Books Received ................................................................. 177 Wellhausenism Evaluated After A Century Of Influence By Raymond F. Surburg Julius Wellhausen (1 844- 19 18) was a famous German Luth- eran higher critic who influenced Biblical and Oriental studies for many generations during the second half of the nineteenth and the early decades of the twentieth centuries. Hans Joachim Kraus wrote of Wellhausen: With his philological, literary-critical, and historical investigations Wellhausen founded a school which has deter- mined for decades the picture of Old Testament science. However all work-performed outside his school and beyond it is inconceivable apart from the solid foundation on which Old Testament science in numerous, and till the present unchangeable, accomplishments was founded.' In describing the importance of Wellhausen Hahn wrote: His position in Old Testament criticism is somewhat analagous to that of Darwin in the intellectual
    [Show full text]
  • Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg Zentrum Für Mittelalterstudien
    OTTO-FRIEDRICH-UNIVERSITÄT BAMBERG ZENTRUM FÜR MITTELALTERSTUDIEN -DIE MITGLIEDER- BAMBERG 2010 Anschrift: Universität Bamberg, Zentrum für Mittelalterstudien, 96045 Bamberg Tel.: 0951/863-2451 – Fax: 0951/863-2306 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.uni-bamberg.de/zemas/ Besucheradresse: Am Kranen 10, Raum 304, 96045 Bamberg Leitungsgremium: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Bennewitz (geschäftsführend), Prof. Dr. Klaus van Eickels, Prof. Dr. Birgitt Hoffmann, Prof. Dr. Achim Hubel, Prof. Dr. Peter Wünsche neues Leitungsgremium (ab 1. April 2010) Prof. Dr. Birgitt Hoffmann (geschäftsführend), Prof. Dr. Stephan Albrecht, Prof. Dr. Klaus van Eickels, Prof. Dr. Andrea Schindler, Prof. Dr. Peter Wünsche Sekretariat: Christiane Schönhammer (vormittags) IMPRESSUM: Zentrum für Mittelalterstudien der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg Herausgeber: Zentrum für Mittelalterstudien Redaktionelle Bearbeitung: Christiane Schönhammer, Sonja Bümlein, Silke Höfs, Tanja Metzger Auflage: 800 Stand: 01. Februar 2010 Vorwort Das am 1. April 1998 eingerichtete Zentrum für Mittelalterstudien der Universität Bam- berg kann seit seiner Gründung ein beachtliches Wachstum verzeichnen. Das betrifft nicht nur die Zahl der Mitglieder, sondern auch die Aktivitäten. Nach einer Änderung der (ersten) Geschäftsordnung im Juli 2006 konnten auch Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus Wis- senschaft und Praxis außerhalb der Universität Bamberg als korrespondierende Mitglieder aufgenommen werden, ebenso nicht promovierte Nachwuchswissenschaftler der Univer- sität Bamberg. Das Zentrum hat derzeit 55 ordentliche Mitglieder, 24 korrespondierende Mitglieder aus Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Tschechien, Italien und den USA und 18 Nachwuchsmitglieder. Das Ziel des Zentrums ist neben der Bündelung und Dokumentation aller mediävisti- schen Aktivitäten die Förderung von interdisziplinären Kolloquien, Ringvorlesungen, interdisziplinären (Ober-)Seminaren und anderen Veranstaltungen, die das Lehrangebot ergänzen sowie die Diskussion zwischen den Fächern bereichern sollen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis: a Reassessment
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1989 The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis: A Reassessment O’Brien, Mark A Abstract: This book undertakes a reassessment of the Deuteronomistic History in response to recent developments which raise questions about Martin Noth’s understanding of the history as a unified and well planned work. The reassessment is carried out via a literary critical, linguistic and contextual analysis of the text, in particular those passages which are generally regarded as Deuteronomistic compositions. The author argues that the history was indeed a well planned and unified work, but one that ended at2 Kgs 23:23 with the reign of Josiah. It was principally a story of Israel’s leaders and Moses and Joshua (Deuteronomy to Judg 2: 10), the period of Israel from the judges to the monarchy (Judg 2:11 to 1 Sam 11:15), and the period of Israel under the prophets and kings (1 Sam 13:1 to 2 Kgs 23:23). Subsequent redaction was carried out in three main stages. The first was a fairly straightforward updating of the history to stage accounted for the exile by applying the history’s critique of the northern kings to the Davidic dynasty. The third stage transferred its attention to the people and sought to transform the history from a story of Israel’s leaders into a story of the people’s failure to observe the law. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-152171 Monograph Published Version Originally published at: O’Brien, Mark A (1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Amos and Amos' Eschatology
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Spring 1991, Vol. 29, No. 1,3-18 Copyright @ 1991 by Andrews University Press. THE ALLEGED "NO" OF AMOS AND AMOS' ESCHATOLOGY GERHARD F. HASEL Andrews University 1. Introduction One of the most hotly contended issues, perhaps even the most difficult problem of the entire OT book of Amos, is the assessment of Amos' message about the future. Does Amos have a message that contains a future for Israel or, in any case, for an entity within Israel? Do his words contain an eschatology or at least one or more aspects of eschatology? Two foundational considerations are undeniable. The first re- lates to the fact that the book of Amos in its canonical form contains messages that clearly hold out a future, if not for Israel as a whole, then at least for a "remnant of Joseph" (5:15). Whether this future hope is eschatological in nature depends to a large degree, but by no means entirely, upon the definition of eschatology. For our purpose it may suffice to say that we follow the broad definition of eschatology in the sense of an end of the present world order which can either be within the flow of history or, in an absolute and final sense, at the end of all history.' 'On the definition of eschatology, see W. Vollborn, Innerxeitliche oder endzeit- liche Gerichtserwartung? Ein Beitrag xu Amos und Jesaja (Kiel, 1938);Joh. Lindblom, "Gibt es eine Eschatologie bei den alttestamentlichen Propheten?" ST 6 (1953): pp. 79- 114; Th. C. Vriezen, "Prophecy and Eschatology," in Congress Volume: Copen- hagen 1953, VTSup, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • " (HE{Fhey) SHALL BE PUT to DEATH" LIVE-PRESERVING DIVINE THREATS in OLD TESTAMENT LAW
    " (HE{fHEY) SHALL BE PUT TO DEATH" LIVE-PRESERVING DIVINE THREATS IN OLD TESTAMENT LAW ERHARDS.GERSTENBERGER One of the main concems in discussing law and liberty is to distinguish clearly between divine and human regulations in the scriptures. Blurring the boun­ dary line is dangerous. Persons or groups who use divine sanctions or try to exe­ cute divine justice soon will consider themselves vice-regents of God himself. They create theocratic systems claiming to know the absolute values and to ad­ minister the purest set of rules without failing. This attitude implies, on the other hand, a superior insight into the nature of evil and a divine commission to eradi­ cate all evildoers. In this fashion theocratic groups or societies inevitably turn to­ talitarian. In other words, drawing divine sanctions into human law, making legal procedure a vehicle for establishing absolute justice, must result in a totalloss of freedom. For quite a while scholarly research on OT Law has focused on what seemed to be authoritative, "apodictic" traits of the old biblical stipulations. Al­ brecht Alt inaugurated this evaluation in 1934 by publishing his famous essay on the "Origins of Israelite Law."1 The scholarly world virtually in unison accepted his description of divine (and genuinely Israelite) Law as being most of all "un­ tamed and aggressively" potent,2 "neglecting all personal facets of guilt,"3 "relat­ ed to the absolute will of Yahweh, therefore administering only the most rigid punishment,"4 "categorical," "determined," and "unconditional." Nobody seemed to feel offended by the violence of these concepts and their totalitarian conse­ quences.s Nobody questioned the notion of God behind such affirmations of un­ mercifulness.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Pentateuch
    INTRODUCTION TO THE PENTATEUCH By G.I. Davies Professor of Old Testament, University of Cambridge From Chapter 3 of The Oxford Bible Commentary edited by John Barton and John Muddiman (Oxford University Press, 2013) http://www.oxfordbiblicalstudies.com/article/book/obso-9780198755005/obso-9780198755005- chapter-3 What is the Pentateuch? The name ‘Pentateuch’ means literally ‘the work comprising five scrolls’, from Greek pente and teukhos, which can mean ‘scroll’. It has been used since at least early Christian times for the first five books of the OT, Genesis to Deuteronomy. The Jewish name for these books was usually and still is ‘the law’: Hebrew tôrâ, Greek nomos or nomothesia (the latter is literally ‘legislation’), and it is this name which appears in the NT: e.g. Lk 24:11 , ‘What is written in the law, the prophets and the psalms’, where we meet the threefold subdivision of the Hebrew canon that continues to be used, with the substitution of ‘writings’ for ‘psalms’ as the third section. Cf. also the Greek Prologue to Sirach (c.132 BCE). But there is a much deeper way of asking, and answering, the question, ‘What is the Pentateuch?’, one which goes beyond merely defining its external limits to enquire into its nature. In other words, what sort of a thing is this section of the Bible? This question can only really be answered after a full examination of the text, and one justification for the kind of detailed critical analysis which has been popular in modern OT scholarship is that it enables us to give a well-judged (if complicated!) answer to that question.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubiläumsausgabe 60 Jahre Augustana (2008)
    60 Jahre augustana in neuendettelsau Erträge Sonderheft Erträge Sonderheft 60 Jahre augustana in neuendettelsau Dokumentation der Beiträge und Reden zum Jubiläumsjahr Augustana-Hochschule mit Unterstützung der Gesellschaft der Freundinnen und Freunde der Augustana-Hochschule e.V. Neuendettelsau 2008 Inhalt Renate Jost Geleitwort ................................................................................... 9 Helmut Utzschneider Vorwort ....................................................................................... 11 I. Die Augustana-Hochschule – 60 Jahre Theologie auf dem Campus Klaus Raschzok 60 Jahre Augustana-Hochschule Neuendettelsau ....................... 15 Susanne Munzert Theologie auf dem Campus Die Augustana-Hochschule als Lernort ...................................... 18 II. Das Jubiläumsfest 7.–9. Dezember 2007 Klaus Raschzok Begrüßung .................................................................................. 27 Günther Beckstein Christliches Menschenbild als Grundlage wert- und zukunftsorientierter Politik ......................................................... 36 Manfred Seitz Erinnerungen an das erste Wintersemester 1947/48 in Neuendettelsau ....................................................................... 47 Dorothea Greiner 60 Jahre Augustana-Hochschule ................................................. 51 6 Inhalt Johannes Friedrich Predigt im Festgottesdienst – 60 Jahre Kirchliche Hochschule Augustana Neuendettelsau – 9. Dezember 2007 ........................ 57 Dorothea Greiner Von Alumna
    [Show full text]
  • "The People of God" in the Old Testament: the View of Eichrodt and Gutierrez As Evaluated by Confessional Lutheran Hermeneutics
    Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Concordia Seminary Scholarship 5-1-1999 "The People of God" In the Old Testament: The View of Eichrodt and Gutierrez as Evaluated by Confessional Lutheran Hermeneutics Acir Raymann Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/phd Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Raymann, Acir, ""The People of God" In the Old Testament: The View of Eichrodt and Gutierrez as Evaluated by Confessional Lutheran Hermeneutics" (1999). Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation. 2. https://scholar.csl.edu/phd/2 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Concordia Seminary Scholarship at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THE PEOPLE OF GOD" IN THE OLD TESTAMENT: THE VIEW OF EICHRODT AND GUTIERREZ AS EVALUATED BY CONFESSIONAL LUTHERAN HERMENEUTICS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Department of Exegetical Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Acir Raymann May 1999 Approved by Adviser Reader Reader TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION iv Chapter I. THE NATURE OF THE PEOPLE OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT 1 Introduction The Terms MD and Ma: General Aspects The Term CD The Term la Theological Implications Theological Implications with the Term CD The Covenant Simul iustus et peccator Theological Implications with the Term Ma II.
    [Show full text]
  • Albrecht Alt 1. Einleitung: Sehr Geehrte Damen Und Herren, Verehrtes Auditorium
    Albrecht Alt 1. Einleitung: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, verehrtes Auditorium, Ein Vortrag über die Person eines bekannten Wissenschaftlers steht immer in der Gefahr, den Charakter einer Laudatio oder eines lobenden Nachrufs zu tragen. Wie gerechtfertigt eine solche Ausrichtung ist, muss sicher von Fall zu Fall entschieden werden. Allerdings bringt der Charakter einer Laudatio stets die Tendenz der Überhöhung und damit der Unwissenschaftlichkeit mit sich. Obwohl ich im Folgenden versucht habe, dies zu vermeiden, ist es bei einem Vortrag über die Person Albrecht Alt kaum möglich, lobende Worte zu unterlassen. Die für seine Zeit immense Publikationsliste und wegweisende Forschung versetzt auch heute noch in Staunen. Dieser Vortrag konzentriert sich zunächst auf das biographisch ausgerichtete Thema Alt als Privatperson und stellt daran anschließend auf das Thema Alt als Wissenschaftler vor. Die Wissenschaftstätigkeit von Albrecht Alt betrachte ich einerseits seinem literarischem Wirken nach und andererseits seinem Schaffen in Deutschland und Israel nach. Zur Aufarbeitung des Lebens Albrecht Alts wurden im Jahr 2015 von Januar bis Mai aus seinem Nachlass 1444 Fotos, 894 Glasdias und 249 Negative und damit insgesamt 2.487 Bildträger digitalisiert, bearbeitet und katalogisiert. Die Motive der Aufnahmen reichen dabei von der Vorlesungstätigkeit Alts über seine Reisen nach und in levantinisches Gebiet bis hin zu Urlaubsbildern. Dieser digitalisierte photographische Nachlass bildet die Grundlage für meinen folgenden Vortrag. Aufgrund des reichhaltigen Quellenmaterials beschränke ich mich allerdings auf eine repräsentative Auswahl an Bildern und versuche die zwangsläufig entstehenden biographischen Lücken durch die Konsultation von Sekundärliteratur zu schließen, um ein biographisches Gesamtbild Alts zeichnen zu können. 2. Die Person Albrecht Alt Am 20.09.1883 wurde Georg Albrecht Alt als einziger Sohn des Pfarrers Johann Friedrich Christian Alt und der Pfarrfrau Maria Justina Karoline Alt in Stübach in Franken geboren.
    [Show full text]
  • Almagia (Roberto)
    ALMAGIA (ROBERTO). --- Elementi di geografia economica e politica. Pte. 1. Geografia ec onomica e politica generale . Milano, 1936. 91 Ate, G eg-1446. --- La geografia. Roma, 1919. Geog. Lib. --- L'Italia. 2 tom. [Turin, 1959.1 .91(45) Alm. --- Another copy. Ital. Lib. --- L'opera geografica di Luca Holstenio. [Studi e Testi, 102.1 Citta del Vaticano, 1942. .9109 Hol. Alm. --- See UNION GEOGRAPHIQUE INTERNATIONALE. COMMISSION POUR LA BIBLIOGRAPHIE DES CARTES ANCIENNES. Rapport. Fasc.1. Rapport au XVIIe Congres International, Washington, 1952. Par R. A. --- and SESTINI (ALDO). --- Il XVII Congresso Geografico Italiano. (Estratto dalla Rivista Geografica Italiana, annata 64, fasc. 2, g-rigno 1957.) [Florence.] '-'` .91(455)04/1. ALMAGRO (MARTIN). See ALMAGRO BASCH (MARTIN). ALMAGRO (MELCHOR FERNANDEZ). See FERNANDEZ ALMAGRO (ME LCHOR). ALMAGRO BASCH (MARTIN) . --- M6rida; guia de la ciudad y de sus monumentos. Merida, 1957. .913(464) Alm. --- Las necropolis de Ampurias. Vol. 1. [Mon. Ampuritanas, No. 3. ] Barcelona. Prehist. Archaeol. Lib. 1. Introduccion y necropolis griegas. 19n --- Origen y formacibn del pueblo hispano. Barcelona, 1953. Prehist. Archaeol. Lib. ADDITIONS ALMAGOR (URI). Pastoral partners; affinity and bond partnership among the Dassanetoh of south-west Ethiopia. With a prefaoe by E.L. Peters. Manchester [1978.] .572(63) Alm. --- See BA TER (PAUL TREVOR WILLIAM) and A. (U.) A ,111AGRO (F RANCISCO). — and CARPD1TE t0 (JOSA, FERN[JTDEL ). -- Heuristioa a Villena y los tree tratadoe. Madrid [1977.1 .8682 Vil. Alm. ALMAGRO BASCH (MA JN). --- Lae estelas deooradas del suroeste peninsular. [Bibl. Praehist. Hispana, Vol. 8. 1 Madrid, 1966. Archaeol. Lib. -- Joint-au^hor. Are Hispanics; historic universal del arts h.ispanioo.
    [Show full text]