JB: Bhattoji on sphota 1 Johannes Bronkhorst Section de langues et civilisations orientales Université de Lausanne BFSH 2 CH-1015 Lausanne
[email protected] Bha††oji D¥k∑ita on spho†a* (published in: Journal of Indian Philosophy 33(1), 2005, 3-41) The philosophy of grammar has only four major representatives in the history of Indian thought. One of these is Bhart®hari, who lived in the fifth century C.E. The other three lived more than a thousand years later, in Benares, and may have known each other. The first of these three, Bha††oji D¥k∑ita, was the paternal uncle of the second, Kauˆ∂a Bha††a. The third one, Någeßa Bha††a, was a pupil of Bha††oji's grandson. This shows that Bha††oji revived the philosophy of Sanskrit grammar after an interval of more than one thousand years. The spho†a does not exclusively belong to the domain of the philosophy of grammar. It is true that a number of grammarians had ideas about this issue, but they were not the only, nor indeed the first ones to do so. The earliest notion of a word and of a sentence as entities that are different from the sounds that express them, may well be found in the early scholastic speculations of the Buddhist Sarvåstivådins, who were not grammarians. Not all of the later thinkers who expressed themselves on the spho†a were grammarians either. Some well-known examples are the following: The Yoga Bhå∑ya, without using the term spho†a, propounds that the word is unitary and without parts.1 The M¥måµsaka Kumårila Bha††a criticized the concept (in his Ílokavårttika, chapter on Spho†avåda) but not without adopting an important part of it (viz., the indivisible speech sounds); the Vedåntin Ía∫kara did the same (on BrahmasËtra 1.3.28).