Boston Latin School Mbta Supplemental Bus Schedule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

BOSTON LATIN SCHOOL MBTA SUPPLEMENTAL BUS SCHEDULE 2017-2018 MORNING BUS SCHEDULE (7:45 AM SCHOOL START) ROUTE DEPARTS ARRIVES ORIGIN LOCATION DESTINATION LOCATION (Of last route, if multiple routes) 8 7:06 AM 7:21 AM KENMORE BUSWAY VIA RUGGLES STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 9 6:35 AM 7:18 AM CITY POINT VIA KENMORE BUSWAY AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 19 6:35 AM 7:17 AM GALLIVAN BOULEVARD AT ADAMS STREET AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 19 6:35 AM 7:17 AM GALLIVAN BOULEVARD AT ADAMS STREET AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 21 6:36 AM 7:17 AM ASHMONT STATION VIA FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 22 6:35 AM 7:21 AM ASHMONT STATION VIA RUGGLES STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 31 6:35 AM 6:51 AM MATTAPAN STATION FOREST HILLS STATION 32 6:45 AM 6:59 AM CLEARY SQUARE FOREST HILLS STATION 32/39 6:30 AM 7:19 AM WOLCOTT SQUARE AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 34/39 6:29 AM 7:17 AM DEDHAM LINE VIA FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 35 6:40 AM 7:24 AM WASHINGTON STREET AT STIMSON STREET AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 36/39 6:50 AM 7:32 AM CHARLES RIVER LOOP VIA FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 37/39 6:30 AM 7:24 AM BAKER STREET AND VERMONT STREET VIA FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 38 6:35 AM 7:11 AM WREN STREET AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 38 6:45 AM 7:12 AM CENTRE STREET AT WEST ROXBURY PARKWAY AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 39 6:57 AM 7:17 AM FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 39 6:57 AM 7:17 AM FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 39 7:03 AM 7:23 AM FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 39 7:04 AM 7:24 AM FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 39 7:12 AM 7:32 AM FOREST HILLS STATION AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR 57A/8 6:42 AM 7:21 AM OAK SQUARE VIA KENMORE BUSWAY AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR AFTERNOON BUS SCHEDULE (2:15 PM SCHOOL DISMISSAL) ROUTE DEPARTS ARRIVES ORIGIN LOCATION DESTINATION LOCATION (Of last route, if multiple routes) 8 2:40 PM 2:57 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR DUDLEY SQUARE 9 2:25 PM 3:20 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR CITY POINT VIA ANDREW SQUARE 19 2:25 PM 3:16 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR GALLIVAN BOULEVARD AT ADAMS STREET 22 2:25 PM 3:08 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR ASHMONT STATION 28 2:25 PM 3:21 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR MATTAPAN STATION 35 2:18 PM 3:19 PM HUNTINGTON AVENUE AT LONGWOOD AVENUE DEDHAM MALL VIA WEST ROXBURY PARKWAY 39 2:28 PM 3:09 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR FOREST HILLS STATION 39/21 2:25 PM 3:15 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR ASHMONT STATION VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 39/32 2:25 PM 3:17 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR WOLCOTT SQUARE VIA CLEARY SQUARE VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 39/34 2:25 PM 3:27 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR DEDHAM LINE VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 39/36 2:25 PM 3:20 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR CHARLES RIVER LOOP VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 39/37 2:25 PM 3:23 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR BAKER STREET AND VERMONT STREET VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 39/38 2:25 PM 3:17 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR WREN STREET VIA FOREST HILLS STATION 57 2:25 PM 2:58 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR WATERTOWN YARD 57 2:25 PM 3:08 PM AVENUE LOUIS PASTEUR WATERTOWN YARD Cynthia Webb, Assistant Head Master MBTA Customer Service Email: [email protected] Website: www.mbta.com/riding_the_t/bps/#Top Telephone: 617-635-8895 Telephone: 617-222-3200 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
[Show full text]
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
y NOTE WONOERLAND 7 THERE HOLDERS Of PREPAID PASSES. ON DECEMBER , 1977 WERE 22,404 2903 THIS AMOUNTS TO AN ESTIMATED (44 ,608 ) PASSENGERS PER DAY, NOT INCLUDED IN TOTALS BELOW REVERE BEACH I OAK 8R0VC 1266 1316 MALOEN CENTER BEACHMONT 2549 1569 SUFFOLK DOWNS 1142 ORIENT< NTS 3450 WELLINGTON 5122 WOOO ISLANC PARK 1071 AIRPORT SULLIVAN SQUARE 1397 6668 I MAVERICK LCOMMUNITY college 5062 LECHMERE| 2049 5645 L.NORTH STATION 22,205 6690 HARVARD HAYMARKET 6925 BOWDOIN , AQUARIUM 5288 1896 I 123 KENDALL GOV CTR 1 8882 CENTRAL™ CHARLES^ STATE 12503 9170 4828 park 2 2 766 i WASHINGTON 24629 BOYLSTON SOUTH STATION UNDER 4 559 (ESSEX 8869 ARLINGTON 5034 10339 "COPLEY BOSTON COLLEGE KENMORE 12102 6102 12933 WATER TOWN BEACON ST. 9225' BROADWAY HIGHLAND AUDITORIUM [PRUDENTIAL BRANCH I5I3C 1868 (DOVER 4169 6063 2976 SYMPHONY NORTHEASTERN 1211 HUNTINGTON AVE. 13000 'NORTHAMPTON 3830 duole . 'STREET (ANDREW 6267 3809 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ricumt inoicati COLUMBIA APFKOIIUATC 4986 ONE WAY TRAFFIC 40KITT10 AT RAPID TRANSIT LINES STATIONS (EGLESTON SAVIN HILL 15 98 AMD AT 3610 SUBWAY ENTRANCES DECEMBER 7,1977 [GREEN 1657 FIELDS CORNER 4032 SHAWMUT 1448 FOREST HILLS ASHMONT NORTH OUINCY I I I 99 8948 3930 WOLLASTON 2761 7935 QUINCY CENTER M b 6433 It ANNUAL REPORT Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/annualreportmass1978mass BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1978 ROBERT R. KILEY Chairman and Chief Executive Officer RICHARD D. BUCK GUIDO R. PERERA, JR. "V CLAIRE R. BARRETT THEODORE C. LANDSMARK NEW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD — 1979 ROBERT L. FOSTER PAUL E. MEANS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 20, 1979 - January 29.
[Show full text]
St. Marks Area (Ashmont/Peabody Square), Dorchester
Commercial Casebook: St Marks Area Historic Boston Incorporated, 2009-2011 St. Marks Area (Ashmont/Peabody Square), Dorchester Introduction to District St. Mark's Main Street District spans a mile-long section of Dorchester Avenue starting from Peabody Square and running north to St. Mark’s Roman Catholic Church campus. The district includes the residential and commercial areas surrounding those two nodes. The area, once rural farmland, began to develop after the Old Colony railroad established a station here in the 1870s. Subsequent trolley service and later electrified train lines, now the MBTA's red line, transformed the neighborhood district into first a “Railroad Suburb” and then a “Streetcar Suburb.” Parts of the area are characterized as “Garden Districts” in recognition of the late 19th century English-inspired development of suburban districts, which included spacious single-family houses built on large lots and the commercial district at Peabody Square. Other areas reflect Boston’s general urban growth in the late 19th and early 20th centuries with densely clustered multi-family housing, including Dorchester’s famous three-deckers, found on the streets surrounding St. Mark’s Church. The district, particularly in Peabody Square, features many late 19th-century buildings, including the landmark All Saints’ Episcopal Church, the Peabody Apartments, a fire station, and a distinctive market building. These surround a small urban park with a monument street clock. The St. Mark’s campus, established a few decades later, mostly in the 1910s and 1920s, is a Commercial Casebook: St Marks Area Historic Boston Incorporated, 2009-2011 collection of ecclesiastical buildings set upon a large, airy parcel.
[Show full text]
2013-0583-3S Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)
Official Audit Report – Issued June 16, 2014 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority For the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012 State House Room 230 Boston, MA 02133 [email protected] www.mass.gov/auditor June 16, 2014 Dr. Beverly Scott, General Manager Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority State Transportation Building 10 Park Plaza, Suite 3910 Boston, MA 02116 Dear Dr. Scott: I am pleased to provide this performance audit of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). This report details the audit objectives, scope, methodology, findings, and recommendations for the audit period, January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012. My audit staff discussed the contents of this report with management of the MBTA, and their comments are reflected in this report. I would also like to express my appreciation to the MBTA for the cooperation and assistance provided to my staff during the audit. Sincerely, Suzanne M. Bump Auditor of the Commonwealth 2013-0583-3A TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW OF AUDITED AGENCY ........................................................................................................................... 3 AUDIT OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 4 DETAILED AUDIT RESULTS AND FINDINGS WITH AUDITEE’S RESPONSE ................................................................
[Show full text]
Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study
Roxbury-Dorchester-Mattapan Transit Needs Study SEPTEMBER 2012 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors [or agency] expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation. i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 A Lack of Trust .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Loss of Rapid Transit Service .......................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
[Show full text]
Chapter 4: Systemwide Context of The
CHAPTER 4 Systemwide Context for the PMT TRANSIT SYSTEM: EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERVIEW The Boston metropolitan area is served by an extensive transit system comprising several comple- mentary components. One component is a hub-and-spoke radial network of rapid transit, express bus, commuter rail, and commuter boat lines that is geared, during peak operations, to efficiently move large volumes of people into and out of the urban core for weekday commutes. Local bus and trackless trolley services fill in gaps and connect the radial “spokes” by offering line haul service in heavily congested urban areas, feeder service to rail, and some inter-suburban linkages. Demand- responsive transportation for people with disabilities and the elderly is also provided. The MBTA is the primary transit provider in the Boston region. The MBTA district is made up of 175 cities and towns and includes communities outside of the 101 municipalities of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization area. The MBTA also provides commuter rail service to Provi- dence, Rhode Island, which lies outside the MBTA district. As can be seen in the following table, almost 99% of daily boardings are on the MBTA’s primary modes: rapid transit (heavy rail and light rail), bus rapid transit (BRT), bus/trackless trolley, and commuter rail. SY S TEMWIDE CONTEXT FOR THE PMT 4-1 TABLE 4-1 operating between Wonderland Station in Re- Typical Weekday Boardings by Mode vere and Bowdoin Station in the Government (Federal Fiscal Year 2007) Center area of Boston. MODE BOARDINGS • Green Line: A 23-mile light rail line over four Rapid transit 730,525 branches: Boston College (B Line), Cleveland Bus (including trackless 355,558 Circle (C Line), Riverside (D Line), and Heath trolley and BRT) Street (E Line).
[Show full text]
Technical Analysis for BRT in the Greater Boston Area
Technical Analysis for BRT in the Greater Boston Area October 2014 In 2013, through a grant from the Barr Foundation, the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) began a technical analysis to determine which corridors could have the potential for gold-standard bus rapid transit (BRT). ITDP is a non-profit that focuses on the design and implementation of BRT systems around the world and has helped to design many of the gold-standard BRTs outside of the US. To date, there are no gold-standard BRTs in the US but there is good potential for Boston to build the first. Initial Corridor Selection Existing Ridership When determining which corridors are ripe for BRT, ITDP applies a methodology that it has used in all of the systems it has helped to design – that is, to focus on the existing ridership as an indication of where BRT could be most successful. BRT infrastructure is generally designed to provide the greatest time savings for the greatest number of people so looking at where the greatest numbers of people currently travel is an important first step. Often, it is the instinct of governments to build BRT where there is no mass transit at all – not even a bus line. But where there are currently no buses, one must rely on a slow build-up of demand over time and it could be years before buses are full and high frequency can be justified. This could lead to empty bus lanes and negative public perception of the project. It also means new operating costs to be carried by the transit agency.
[Show full text]
Fairmount Indigo Planning Initiative Corridor Plan Appendices
FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE CORRIDOR PLAN APPENDICES CORRIDOR PLAN FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE SEPTEMBER 2014 WWW.FAIRMOUNTINDIGOPLANNING.ORG FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE CORRIDOR PLAN APPENDICES Appendices Contents 1 Process and Meetings 2 Existing Conditions Analysis 3 Growth Strategy Methodology PROCESS AND MEETINGS PROCESS AND MEETINGS The Fairmount Indigo Planning Initiative was over a 2 5. CAG Discussion year long process that involved extensive community 6. Suggested Case Studies of Corridors outreach, participation and conversation. The Planning 7. Community Forum Preparations Initiative involved separate, but parallel processes for 8. Next Steps Corridor-wide planning and Station Area planning. The City of Boston appointed members of a Corridor Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #4 Advisory Group (CAG) to be a consistent voice of the October 10, 2012 Corridor community and neighborhoods throughout 1. Welcome and Introductions the process. 2. Summary of Previous Meeting 3. Department of Neighborhood Development The CAG Members dedicated over a year of meetings 4. Community Forum and discussion to the Corridor and the City is grateful 5. Corridor Case Studies for their contributions. All Corridor Advisory Group 6. Next Steps meetings were open to the public, held in locations throughout the Corridor and attended by members of Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #5 the community. The following is a list of meetings and November 13, 2012 agendas that were a part of this community planning 1. Overview of Community Forum process: 2. CAG Member Roles at Forum 3. Virtual Corridor Tour and CAG Speakers Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 4. Discussion of Break-out Group Questions June 14, 2012 5.
[Show full text]
Chapter 3 Community Assets
Chapter 3 p Community Assets 200 Health of Boston 2016-2017 201 3 | Community Assets Community Assets Social determinants of health are socioeconomic, environmental, and social resources that lay the foundation for health during childhood and may have lasting effects through adulthood (1). The previous chapter presented data on socioeconomic determinants of health such as educational attainment, employment, income, and housing status and the association of these factors with specific health outcomes. This chapter will focus on community-level social determinants of health referred to as “community assets.” Broadly speaking, community assets are the collective resources that make it easier for people to make healthy choices. An asset-based approach recognizes the importance of social, cultural, and physical resources that exist within the community (2). Community assets increase an individual’s opportunity to engage in activities that improve health and well- being (3). Anything that improves the quality of community life may be considered a community asset (4) including: • Community programs such as community gardens and farmer’s markets • Local businesses such as grocery stores and restaurants • Natural resources such as rivers, trees, and green space • Built environment such as parks, playgrounds, and walking paths • Neighborhood groups such as community advisory and crime watch groups • Municipal services such as police, fire, and recreation services • Public institutions such as schools, churches, and libraries • Resources promoting civic engagement such as call services for reporting non-emergency issues to local officials (e.g. Boston 311) Access to healthy foods, active living environments, opportunities that give individuals a voice in the political process, and good municipal services may contribute to the health of residents (5-10).
[Show full text]
Route 28 Bus: It Takes You the Long Way Home by Samuel Wohlforth, Reporter Correspondent May 3, 2018
Route 28 bus: It takes you the long way home By Samuel Wohlforth, Reporter Correspondent May 3, 2018 The 28 bus makes its way up Blue Hill Avenue— slowly. Samuel Wohlforth photo Congestion on the streets of Dorchester and Mattapan – and an antiquated fare collection that will be upgraded over the next two years – has slowed bus travel and contributed to a nine percent decline in ridership over a recent three-year period (2014-2016) on the most heavily used bus route through Mattapan, the 28. According to an analysis of MBTA data published by the transit advocacy group Livable Streets Alliance, the 28 is among the most used, but slowest bus routes in the city, subjecting Mattapan and Dorchester residents to long rides from Mattapan to Ruggles Station in Roxbury. As the most important bus route in a part of the city with limited rapid transit options, the 28 serves as a crucial connector for the communities it serves. Mattapan, in particular, has one of the lowest rates of car ownership in the city, so bus service is crucial to getting many residents to their jobs, school, church, doctor’s appointments, and more. For all of these reasons, the 28 has the highest ridership rates out of the MBTA’s 163 bus routes – more than 12,000 riders use it every day. On the other hand, it ranks as the 19th-slowest route in the system. “The 28 bus is at the bottom of the list,” said Pamela Bush-Miles, who rode the 28 for many years as a resident of Hyde Park and, later, of Mattapan.
[Show full text]
The Mattapan Trolley: Public Transit Improvements Amidst Displacement Concerns
Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2020 The Mattapan Trolley: Public Transit Improvements amidst Displacement Concerns Allegra Amram DeNooyer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation DeNooyer, Allegra Amram, "The Mattapan Trolley: Public Transit Improvements amidst Displacement Concerns" (2020). Senior Capstone Projects. 992. https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/992 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Mattapan Trolley: Public Transit Improvements amidst Displacement Concerns Allegra Amram DeNooyer May 15, 2020 Senior Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies Adviser, Timothy Koechlin DeNooyer 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………..2 Note on Terms……………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Chapter 1: Public Transit in Boston: 1897 to Present Day………………………….……...........11 Chapter 2: Community Reactions to the Mattapan Line Transformation……………....………..24 Chapter 3: Transit Inequity: Structural Disinvestment in Mattapan………….………………….34 Chapter 4: Transit-Oriented Development: Gentrification and Displacement in Mattapan……..51 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….62
[Show full text]