The Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Government Publication Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services The Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control DO NOT RETURN TO NAL I I PCARRD Technical Bulletin Series No. 57 This material was purchased NOTICE: This materfal may be for you by NAL-lnte, hbrnry protected by Copyright Law borrowinv :,ection (PL 94-533 and Title 17, U.S. Code) PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RESOURCES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Nc1 tional Sr.ie:1ce and Technology Authority Los Bai'los, Laguna 1985 - JU\ 2~ M! I 0(1/r 1st printing, 1985 . ; Foreword No part of this publication can be reproduced without written permission I " - Rodents are notorious agricultural pests. Their presence always causes from the publisher. concern since they are capable of destruction and big losses. They can damage crops from nursery to storage, largely contributing to low yields and huge post-harvest losses. Estimated crop loss due to rat damage can run into millions of pesos. Significant findings of rodent research prompted the publication of the Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control. This volume summarizes Published through the Philippine Agriculture basic information on rodent biology and ecology. It also recommends and Resources Research Foundation, Inc. measures to reduce losses in major crops due to rodent attack. The estimated net returns per hectare of rodent control ls also included to give the farmers of various crops an idea of the benefits they can derive from the practice for each unit cost that they are willing to incur. U. p LO', RANOS The Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control is published as an LIHKAK Y attempt to contain the perenniql rodf\(\t_ ~r?blem in rice, coconut, corn, sugar, coffee and other economically vital crops. !tN~-~:At: Executive Director PCARRD iii ... Acknowledgment The Rodent Control Committee The Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research and 1984 Development (PCARRD) is grateful to Chancellor Emil Q. Javier of the University of the Philippines at Los Banos, Director Domingo F. Panganiban of the Bureau of Plant Industry, and Dr. Dante B. de Padua Pablo J. Alfonso Melanda M. Hoque of the National Post-Harvest Institute for Research and Extension for Asst. Professor Researcher allowing their respective staff to serve as members of the committee De9artment of Zoology NCPC which drafted the Philippines Recommends for Rodent Control. University of the Philippines University of the Philippines Los Bafios, Laguna Los Banos. Laguna Acknowledgment is also due Mr. Reynaldo G. abad and Mr. Emma­ nuel Aterrado for providing valuable information and pictures on rodent Edwin A. Benigno Priscilla P. Rubio control in coconuts, Dr. Dolores F. Hernandez of UP, the Science Education Researcher Senior Science Research Specialist Center and Dr. Dioscoro Rabor of UP College of Forestry for allowing the Naiional Crop Protection Center Crops Research Department reproduction of rat illustrations, Mr. Joselito A. Payot and Ms. Concep­ (NCPC) PCARRD cion E. Magboo of PCARRD for their help in preparing the manuscript. University of the Philippines Los Banos. Laguna Los Banos. Laguna Fernando F. Sanchez F!lipinas M. Caliboso Director f\:ational Postharvest Institute NCPC for Research and Extension University of the Philippines T~gu1n. Metro Manila Los Banos. Laguna Lynwood Fiedler Jesus P. Sumangil Visiting Asst. Professor Chief. Plant Pest Control Division NCPC Bureau of Plant Industry Uni11crs1 ty of the Philippines San Andres, Metro Manila L0s Banos. Laguna Deiy P. Gapasin Madeline B. Ouiamco Director.Crops Research Dept. Senior Science Research Specialist Prilippinc Council for Agricul- Applied Communication ture and Resources Research Department t1nd Development (PCARRD) PCARRD Lcs Barios. Laguna Los Banos, Laguna IV Rice 20 Damage 20 Species Involved 21 Control Methods 21 Contents Cost and 'Return 22 Coconut 22 Foreword iii Damage 22 Species Involved 24 Acknowledgment iv Control Methods 24 Cost and Return 27 The Rodent Control Committee, 1984 V Corn 28 Damage 28 Introduction 1 Species Involved 29 Control Methods 30 Rodent Forms 3 Cost and Return 31 Common Ricefield Rat 3 Asian Ricefield Rat 3 Sugarcane 31 Polynesian or Bush Rat 4 Damage 31 Norway Rat 4 Species Involved 31 Philippine House Mouse 4 Control Methods 32 Cost and Return 33 Population Characteristics 8 Life History 8 Coffee 35 Reproduction 8 Damage 35 Social Structure and Communities 9 Species Involved 35 Movement and Migration 9 Control Methods 35 Feeding Behavior 9 Cost and Return 36 Shelter Preference 10 Burrowing Habits 10 Root Crops 36 Damage 36 Control Methods 11 Species Involved 37 Physical Methods 11 Control Methods 37 Chemical Method 13 Cost and Re turn 38 Cultural MetJ:lods 13 Other Methods 14 Pineapple 38 Damage 38 Polson Baiting 15 Species Involved 39 Bait Containers 15 Baiting Methods 39 Baits 16 Cost and Return 39 Rodentic,des 16 Bait Placement 18 Ct;curbits 41 Cost and Benefits 18 Damage 41 Species Involved 41 Crop-Specific Measures for Controlling Baiting Methods 42 Rat Damage 20 vii vi lpil-lpil 42 Damage 42 6. Rat damage to rice 20 Species Involved 42 7. Baiting in ricefield 22 Control Methods 42 8. Rat damage to coconuts 23 . Cost and Return 43 9. A packet of bait is placed in the coconut crown with the aid of a bamboo pole 25 · Stored Products 45 10. Grour.d baiting in coconut 26 11. (30-40 Damage Patterns in Warehouse 45 Wide metal strip cm) is wrapped and nailed around the Species Involved 45 tree 3 m from the ground 27 Control Methods 45 12. Ra t damage to corn ears 29 13. Baiting in cornfields 30 14. Sugarcane damaged by rats at about seven months after r,lantmg 32 . 15. Start baiting seven months after planting sugarcane. Continue .. List of Tables baiting until harvest 34 1. Relative cost of mixed baits using 5 commercially available 16. Baiting in coffee starts before the emergence of new growth. anticoagulant rodenticides and rice shorts 11 Bait holder Is tied to the trunk of the tree 35 Baiting on the cassava field when tubers are mature 37 2. Summary of cost and benefits of sustained poison baiting per 17. Rat damage to pineapple fruit 39 hectare of different crops, based on 1983 prices 19 18. 3. Cost and return of sustained baiting in a 1-ha ricetield 23 19. Two bait holders are placed at each corner of pineapple 4. Annual cost and return comparison ot three control methods field 40 used In 1-ha coconut plantation with 100 trees 28 20. Rat damage to patola 41 . Girdling or gnawing of bark is a characteristic ra t damage to 5. Cost and return of rodent control per hectare ot cornfield 31 21 . 6. Comparison between cost and return of preliminary ipil-ipil 43 recommendation and VMC rat control method, used on 1 ha of 22. Points of entry of rodents into warehouse 46 heavily infested cane field, assuming 4-month baiting 34 23. Proofing the bottom of a door 47 7. Cost ana return of rodent control in Kiangan. llugao on 1 ha 24. Rat guard on drain pipe 47 (600 trees) coffee plantation 36 8. Cost and return of rodent control per hectare of sweet potato References 49 and cassava fields 38 9. Cost and return of roden t ,ontrol per hectare ol pineapple Appendices 51 field 40 A Safety Precautions 10. Cost and return of ba1tinq 1 ha of ,p,I.,p,I during the lust year B. Symbols and Abbreviations after planting 44 c M:inagerial Types of Field Rat Control . o List of Banned and Restricted Pesticides in the Philippines List of Figures 1. Illustration of mammary formula (a) 3 + 3 = 12; (b) 2 + 3 = 10 5 2. Some common rodent pests of agricultural crops in the Philfppines 6 3. (a) Rattus rattus mindanens1s 6 (b) R. norvegicus 7 (c) Mus castaneus 7 4. Trapping of rat with ~nap trap 12 5. Types of bait holders 15 viii Ix 1 I II Introduction Rodents are real pests in agriculture and residential communities. They cause considerable damage to standing crops and stored products, and contaminate food and feedstuff. They damage building structures, transmit infectious diseases, and annoy people. Losses that rodents have inflicted on agriculture has been a major concern. Rat damage in crops range from 2-50% of production. Ricefields suffered 2-6% rodent damage nationally in 1971-1975. Yield loss of 6.16% recorded in a 2-season rice farm in 1975 was estimated to value P721 .5 M. Surveys in Negros farms also showed rat damage on 30-50% of the canes, rezulting in sugar loss of 8% in 1967 or an estimated loss of about P1 3 M. Few coconut plantations are free from rats, and estimates of crop loss traceable to them vary from 14-40% from region to region. Although nationwide estimates of rat damage are not available as yet except in rice, farmers and government field technicians are fully aware of the sizable loss rats cause on other agricultural crops. Many corn farmers r':!alize that loss of germinating seeds and developing corn ears to rats can often be severe. Girdling, cut branches, and severe defoliation due to rat results in decreased coffee berry production. Tell-tale signs of rat damage on pineapple are gnawed tops or crowns at early fruiting stage ano gnawing off of the succulent flesh from mature fruits. Cacao, cucur­ b1t~. sweet potato, cassava, papaya and other important economic plants have also been observed to sustain rat damage. Rats attack warehouses as well. Few modern and conventional ware­ hot•se~ are free from rat infestation. About 12-25 cavans of stored grain c:ire lost to rats per warehouse annually.
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia
    CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation i ii CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation By Ibnu Maryanto Maharadatunkamsi Anang Setiawan Achmadi Sigit Wiantoro Eko Sulistyadi Masaaki Yoneda Agustinus Suyanto Jito Sugardjito RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) iii © 2019 RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) Cataloging in Publication Data. CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA: Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation/ Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Anang Setiawan Achmadi, Sigit Wiantoro, Eko Sulistyadi, Masaaki Yoneda, Agustinus Suyanto, & Jito Sugardjito. ix+ 66 pp; 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN: 978-979-579-108-9 1. Checklist of mammals 2. Indonesia Cover Desain : Eko Harsono Photo : I. Maryanto Third Edition : December 2019 Published by: RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI). Jl Raya Jakarta-Bogor, Km 46, Cibinong, Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911 Telp: 021-87907604/87907636; Fax: 021-87907612 Email: [email protected] . iv PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION This book is a third edition of checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia. The new edition provides remarkable information in several ways compare to the first and second editions, the remarks column contain the abbreviation of the specific island distributions, synonym and specific location. Thus, in this edition we are also corrected the distribution of some species including some new additional species in accordance with the discovery of new species in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O
    Journal of Environmental Science and Management 17(2): 63-68 (December 2014) ISSN 0119-1144 Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O. de Guia1 and Ma. Niña Regina M. Quibod2 ABSTRACT Three non-native species (Rattus exulans, R. tanezumi and Mus musculus) of small non-volant mammals were recorded along various elevational gradients of Mount Makiling. Invertebrate remains and plant matter comprised the bulk of their diets based on the food items identifed. The identifed plant matter were leaves and seeds while invertebrates were easily identifable through body parts such as legs, head and antennae. Other contents identifed including vertebrate remains such as hair/fur, feathers and bones, plastics, rubber, stones, and intestinal worms were noted. Based on the calculated relative abundance of each food type, there is no signifcant difference in the diets of the three non-native rodent species. Preliminary results suggest that introduced rodents in Mt. Makiling have broad diets and there are no indications that their main diet includes native wildlife species. Traces of vertebrate remains, however, may indicate potential predation on wildlife species and further studies are needed to clarify this. Key words: rodents, gut analysis, endemic, non-native, elevational gradient INTRODUCTION The complexity of tropical mountain ecosystems endemic species (Rickart et al. 2007; Ong and Rickart 2008). have long provided haven for various Philippine wildlife R. exulans and R. tanezumi have been recorded at altitudes species. The elevational gradients provide various forest of 725 – 1450 masl on Mt. Isarog (Heaney et al. 1998). S. types while vertical stratifcation of trees offer habitat murinus, R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Chromosome Study of Rattus Rattus Mindanensis and Rattus Argentiventerl Doris H
    A COMPARATIVE CHROMOSOME STUDY OF RATTUS RATTUS MINDANENSIS AND RATTUS ARGENTIVENTERL DORIS H. WURSTER and GERRY C. ATWELL' Rattus argentiventer and Rattus rattus mindanensis are impor. tant agricultural pest species in the Philippines. Comparative chromo. some studies have been performed on these species to further clarify their taxonomic status and gain insight Into their cytogenic relation­ ship. The two forms can be consistently ldent'f led by differences in their sex chromosomes. Rodents of the genus Rattus have long been a problem in agricultural areas of the Philippines. Damage to rice, corn, coconuts, sweet potatoes, bananas, sugar cane, peanuts, cantelope and watermelons is extensive. Bio­ logists at the Rodent Research Center at the University of the Philippines' College of Agriculture estim'jted the preharvest loss of rice due to rats at $8,000,000 (Swink et ai., 1971). This estinate was based on the nationwide appraisal of rat damage to rice condicted by the Bureau of Plant Industry in 1970. Losses of other crops have not been quantitatively documented but can be extremely high at the local level. Through the late 1960's, investigators workilg in lowland areas in the Philippines did not agree on the taxonomy of the "ricefield" rat. Usually the taxa Rattus rattus umbriventer Kellogg, R. r. mindanensis Mearns and R. r. argentiventer Robinson and Kloss were used synonymously (Sumangil, 1963; 1965). Clark (1968) indicated that at least two of these animals were indeed true subspecies. Based on specirmens identified at the British Museum he stated that in Cotabato, the most important pest species was not R.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Native and Non-Native Rats (Rattus Spp.) Along an Elevational Gradient in a Tropical Rainforest of Southern Luzon, Philippines
    ECOTROPICA 14: 129–136, 2008 © Society for Tropical Ecology DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE RATS (RATTUS SPP.) ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF SOUTHERN LUZON, PHILIPPINES Cristina C. Salibay & Hazel Anne V. Luyon De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines Abstract. Rats (Muridae) of the genus Rattus occur in the Philippines, both as native and as invasive species. While the invasive species are well known to use a large range of anthropogenic habitats, little is known about their potential to occur in forest areas. We studied the occurrence and relative abundance of different species of Rattus in forests along elevational gradients on three mountains within the Palay-palay / Mataas na Gulod National Park in Southern Luzon, Philippines. Four Rattus species were collected and their occurrence and relative abundance were found to differ significantly between species and along elevational gradients. Rattus norvegicus (40.3% of captures), R. tanezumi (21.5%), and R. argentiventer (5.6%) are invasive species and R. everetti (32.7%) a native forest-inhabiting species. While the three invasive species were most abundant at low elevations, R. everetti was most abundant at higher elevations. The number of invasive rats has been attributed to their survival and adaptation at lower elevations, where habitat conversion and degradation are most intense, while native species are more common at higher elevations where habitat is relatively un- disturbed. Key words: elevation, forest species, invasive species, Philippines, rainforest, Rattus species. INTRODUCTION and occur at high abundances in local mammal as- semblages (Heaney et al. 1998, Steppan et al. 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • (Nerium Oleander) Against Metabolism, Activity Pattern, and the Leaves Potency As Rice-Field Rat Repellent (Rattus Argentiventer) †
    Proceedings Effects of Oleander Leaves (Nerium oleander) against Metabolism, Activity Pattern, and the Leaves Potency as Rice-Field Rat Repellent (Rattus argentiventer) † Ichsan Nurul Bari 1,*, Nur’aini Herawati 2 and Syifa Nabilah Subakti Putri 1,* 1 Pest Laboratory, Vertebrae Sub­division, Department of Pest and Plant Disease, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia 2 Indonesian Center for Rice Research, Jalan Raya 9, Sukamandi, Subang 41256, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (I.N.B.); [email protected] (S.N.S.P.) † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/. Published: 3 December 2020 Abstract: Nerium oleander is a plant that has historically been known as one of the poisonous plants in the world that can be used to control pests. However, studies on the effects of oleander leave against Rattus argentiventer as a major agricultural rodent pest are limited. This research aimed to probe the potency of oleander leaves extracted in methanol as rice­field rat repellent. The experiments involve a choice test (T­ maze arena) and a no­choice test (metabolic cage) that being analyzed by the T­test using three replications for six days. The result showed that the rats on the T­maze avoided consuming food and beverage near the oleander treatment. The same result occurs in the metabolic cage, which was indicated by the decrease in the average of food and feces, and also the increase in the average of beverage and urine. Besides, the treatment also caused daily activity patterns disorder, which was significantly indicated by the increase of the average percentage of time for resting activities by 22.84% and the decrease of time for locomotion and nesting activities (by 9.71% and 13.13% respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012. Provisional Checklist of Mammals of Borneo Ver 19.11.2012
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/257427722 2012. Provisional Checklist of Mammals of Borneo Ver 19.11.2012 DATASET · OCTOBER 2013 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1760.3280 READS 137 6 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Mohd Ridwan Abd Rahman MT Abdullah University Malaysia Sarawak Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 19 PUBLICATIONS 16 CITATIONS 120 PUBLICATIONS 184 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: MT Abdullah Retrieved on: 26 October 2015 Provisional Checklist of Mammals of Borneo Compiled by M.T. Abdullah & Mohd Isham Azhar Department of Zoology Faculty of Resource Science and Technology Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak Email: [email protected] No Order Family Species English name Notes 01.01.01.01 Insectivora Erinaceidae Echinosorex gymnurus Moonrat 01.01.02.02 Insectivora Erinaceidae Hylomys suillus Lesser gymnure 01.02.03.03 Insectivora Soricidae Suncus murinus House shrew 01.02.03.04 Insectivora Soricidae Suncus ater Black shrew 01.02.03.05 Insectivora Soricidae Suncus etruscus Savi's pigmy shrew 01.02.04.06 Insectivora Soricidae Crocidura monticola Sunda shrew South-east Asia white-toothed 01.02.04.07 Insectivora Soricidae Crocidura fuligino shrew 01.02.05.08 Insectivora Soricidae Chimarrogale himalayica Himalayan water shrew 02.03.06.09 Scandentia Tupaiidae Ptilocercus lowii Pentail treeshrew 2.3.7.10 Scandentia Tupaiidae Tupaia glis Common treeshrew 2.3.7.11 Scandentia Tupaiidae Tupaia splendidula Ruddy treeshrew 2.3.7.12 Scandentia Tupaiidae
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Current Knowledge of Rodent Behaviour in Relation to Control Devices
    A review of the current knowledge of rodent behaviour in relation to control devices B. Kay Clapperton SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 263 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand Cover: Rat emerging from rat tunnel with poison bait in mouth, Breaksea Island, Fiordland National Park, 1985. Photo: IRC, DOC. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science and Research. © Copyright March 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 ISBN 0–478–14065–7 This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing by Lynette Clelland and layout by Lynette Clelland and Liz Coombes (cover). Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Interpretation 7 1.3 Objectives 8 2. Methods 8 3. Results 9 3.1 Taste preferences and
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Mammalian Fauna of Sulawesi (Celebes) 201-216 © Biodiversity Heritage Library
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mammalian Biology (früher Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde) Jahr/Year: 1975 Band/Volume: 41 Autor(en)/Author(s): Groves Colin P. Artikel/Article: The origin of the mammalian fauna of Sulawesi (Celebes) 201-216 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ The origin of the mammalian fauna of Sulawesi (Celebes) By Colin P. Groves Receipt of Ms. 21. 5. 1975 It has long been appreciated that within the Indonesian archipelago lies one of the most remarkable zoogeographical boundaries in the world. In Java, Sumatra and Borneo may be found the typical Oriental Fauna, with representatives of the Pongidae, Cercopithecidae, Lorisidae, Felidae, Mustelidae, Elephantidae, and other families from many mammalian Orders; in New Guinea, 1300 km due east, none of these groups occur, indeed no placental order appears to be indigenous except the Rodentia, and the most conspicuous mammals, the Marsupiais, are absent from the Oriental region. Fig. 1. Map of the Indo-Australian Archipelago showing the three faunal hnes — Waliace's, Weber's and Lydekker's — discussed in the text of this paper But this is not the whole story. The bulk of the Oriental fauna is already missing from Sulawesi, only 50 km from Borneo across the Makassar straits; and the islands dosest to New Guinea, such as Seram and Halmaheira, already lack the major part of the latter's fauna, To the south, Lombok appeared to some authors to be gravely depauperate compared to Bali; Timor, compared to Australia. Two Standard text- books of zoogeography represent this Situation in slightly different ways: de Beau- FORT (1951) treats it in terms of three faunal lines — Waliace's, Weber's and Lydekker's — while Darlington (1957) prefers to qualify the zone itself as a "Subtraction-transition zone".
    [Show full text]
  • (Genus Maxomys) with Descriptions of Two New Species From
    Morphological and molecular systematics of Southeast Asian spiny rats (genus Maxomys) with descriptions of two new Title species from Indonesia Author(s) ACHMADI, ANANG SETIAWAN Citation 北海道大学. 博士(環境科学) 乙第7016号 Issue Date 2017-03-23 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.r7016 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/68320 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Anang_SetiawanAchmadi.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Morphological and molecular systematics of Southeast Asian spiny rats (genus Maxomys) with descriptions of two new species from Indonesia Anang Setiawan Achmadi A Thesis Presented to Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, for the Degree of PhD January 2017 Contents SUMMARY 1 PREFACE 4 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER I 10 Taxonomic status of spiny rats (Maxomys Jentink, Rodentia) from Indonesia and Malaysia based on morphological study 10 I.1 Introduction 10 I.2 Materials and Methods 12 I.3 Results and Discussion 13 Univariate statistics 13 Multiple regression 13 Morphological variation within genus Maxomys 14 Geographical variation within Maxomys whiteheadi based on morphological characters 15 CHAPTER II 20 Quantitative color variation among species of the Southeast Asian spiny rats genus Maxomys (Rodentia: Muridae) using spectrophotometry 20 II.1 Introduction 20 II.2 Materials and Methods 22 II.3 Results 23 Descriptive analysis 23 PCA and DFA analyses 24 II.4 Discussion 25 CHAPTER III 28 Phylogeny, diversity, and biogeography of Southeast Asian spiny rats (Maxomys) 28 III.1 Introduction 28 III.2 Materials and Methods 31 III.3 Results 35 III.4 Discussion 38 CHAPTER IV 43 Descriptions of two new species of the genus Maxomys from East Kalimantan, Borneo Island and Mount Tompotika, Sulawesi Island 43 IV.1 Introduction 43 IV.2 Materials and Methods 46 Study area and fieldwork 46 Morphological data and analyses 47 IV.3 Results 48 IV.3.1 Description of new species of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Cooking Oil As a Substrate for Biosynthesis of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)
    Malaysian Journal of Microbiology, Vol 11(1) 2015, pp. 93-101 Malaysian Journal of Microbiology Published by Malaysian Society of Microbiology (In since 2011) Serological and molecular detection of Leptospira spp. from small wild mammals captured in Sarawak, Malaysia S Thayaparan1*, Ian D Robertson1 and Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah2 1College of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 6150 Murdoch, Western Australia. 2Centre for Kenyir Ecosystems Research, Institute for Kenyir Research, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Received 2 September 2014; Received in revised form 23 December 2014; Accepted 1 January 2015 ABSTRACT Aims: Leptospirosis is endemic to tropical regions of the world and is re-emerging as a new danger to public health in Southeast Asia, including Malaysia. The purpose of this particular study was to determine the common leptospiral serovars present in small wild mammals living around wildlife reserves and disturbed forest habitats and human communities. Methodology and results: The samples of blood and kidneys of small rodents, bats and squirrels were analyzed. Antibodies to different serovars of leptospires were detected in 73 of 155 wild small mammals captured (47.0%: 95% CI 39.0-55.3%). The seroprevalence for rats (57.9%; 95% CI 44.1-70.9) was slightly higher than that for squirrels (42.9%; 95% CI 24.5-62.8) and bats (40%; 95% CI 28.5-52.4). Seropositive animals were detected in all 5 localities sampled. Antibodies to serovar Lepto 175 Sarawak were detected in 30 (24.7%) rats, 11 (9.0%) squirrels and 27 (52.9%) bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Study of Bandicoot Rat Population in Paddy Field, Kedah
    International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation, Vol. 8 (June) ISSN 2462-1757 2 019 PRELIMINARY STUDY OF BANDICOOT RAT POPULATION IN PADDY FIELD, KEDAH Maisarah Burhanuddin Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Email: [email protected] Hafidzi Mohd Noor Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Kedah known as the National Granary (Jelapang Padi Negara) as it is the largest rice cultivation and producing state in Malaysia. In terms of rat pest, the ricefield rat (Rattus argentiventer) is commonly present in the state and elsewhere. As recent as from five years ago, the greater bandicoot rat (Bandicota indica) is more prominent as attested by local farmers. The greater bandicoot rat (Bandicota indica) is an extant population of rat introduced in northern peninsular Malaysia from Central Asia. They were found to be vicious and resulted in serious pest damage in multi-agriculture lands such as paddy field, wheat fields, and even vegetable farms. However, there is a lack of information and research them in Malaysia. Therefore, a removal sampling technique was used and evaluated according to its assumptions for estimating the absolute densities of greater bandicoot rat (Bandicota indica) in paddy fields in Kedah. The study was conducted during the land preparation stage of the rice field during the dry season. Removal sampling is a method of absolute density estimation based on the decline in successive catch numbers as individuals are abstracted from a population. A linear regression method was used to calculate the density estimate using the removal sampling data.
    [Show full text]