Steelmaking and Steel Fabricating Potentials in Georgia and the Southeast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Steelmaking and Steel Fabricating Potentials in Georgia and the Southeast Steelmaking and Steel Fabricating Potentials in Georgia and the Southeast by Tze I. Chiang William C. Eisenhauer ,, d, ( , .' • ± „ . c „ Martha A. Deadmore INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION tataztl ,.'1, ‘ \\,, e,90 P y Project E-400-220 1969 Engineering Experiment Station GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Atlanta, Georgia Project E-400-220 STEELMAKING AND STEEL FABRICATING POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA AND THE SOUTHEAST by Tze I. Chiang William C. Eisenhauer Martha A. Deadmore Industrial Development Division Engineering Experiment Station GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1969 Table of Contents Page Foreword Acknowledgments iii Summary v INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Objectives 1 Scope 2 General Approach 3 AN ECONOMIC REVIEW OF THE U. S. STEEL INDUSTRY 4 Steel and the American Economy 4 Shipments, Exports, Imports, and Consumption 8 Steel Forecast to 1980 14 Major Market Outlets 15 Technology and Investments 18 Pricing Structure and Regional Development 20 Regional Trends in Steel Production 24 THE DEMAND FOR AND SUPPLY OF STEEL MILL PRODUCTS IN THE SOUTHEAST 28 Demand for Domestic Steel 28 Imports 36 The Basis for Market Growth -- Steel Fabrication in the Six- State Area 39 Production Capacity 44 The Supply-Demand Deficit 49 GEORGIA'S POSITION FOR SERVING THE SOUTHEASTERN MARKET 53 Freight Costs and Delivery Time 53 Labor Costs and Availability 62 Sources of Raw Materials 64 The Growing Economic Base of Georgia and Bordering States 67 STEEL FABRICATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GEORGIA 72 Commercial Forgings 72 Ball and Roller Bearings 73 Page Household Appliances 76 Metal Office Furniture 81 Selected Fabricated Metal Products 89 Selected Nonelectrical Machinery 93 Selected Transportation Equipment 96 Selected Instruments and Photographic Equipment 101 Metal Toys and Games 103 Structural Steel Fabrication 103 SELECTED REFERENCES 107 APPENDICES 113 1. Steel Ingot Production vs. Population in the United States, 1960-1967 115 2. Net Shipments of Steel Products in the United States, 1958- 1967 116 3. U. S. Raw Steel Forecasts 117 4. Number of Plants and Employees of Metalworking Industries in the United States and in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 119 5. Steel Mill Facilities in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 128 6. Inbound and Outbound Rail Shipments of Steel Mill Products in the Six Southeastern States, 1964 129 7. Railroad Rates 130 8. Ferrous Scrap Prices in Major U. S. Cities 134 9. Steel Scrap Supply and Consumption by Regions in the United States and in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 135 10. Representative Iron Ore Prices, 1969 136 11. Economic Growth Indicators in Georgia and Bordering States 139 * Tables 1. Indexes of Steel Ingot Production, Industrial Production, and Gross National Product in the United States, 1947-1968 7 2. Production, Shipments, Imports, Exports, and Consumption of Steel Mill Products in the United States, 1954-1968 9 3. Shipments, Exports, and Imports as a Percentage of Consump- tion of Steel Mill Products in the United States, 1954-1968 12 4. Forecast One: Projected Steel Ingot Production and Shipments, Exports, Imports, and Consumption of Steel Products in the United States, 1975 and 1980 14 Page Tables (continued) 5. Forecast Two: Projected Steel Ingot Production and Shipments, Exports, Imports, and Consumption of Steel Products in the United States, 1975 and 1980 15 6. Domestic Steel Distribution by Market Classifications, 1950- 1968 16 7. Steel Ingot Production, 1947-1965, U. S. and Major Steel Producing Centers 25 8. Shares of Total Steel Ingot Output Produced by Major Steel Centers, 1947-1965 25 9. Partial Demand for Domestic Steel Mill Products in the Six Southeastern States, 1960-1967 29 10. Share of Steel Shipments to the Six-State Area in 1967 and Percentage Increase for Carbon, Alloy, and Stainless Steels, 1960-1967, for Each State 31 11. Estimated Distribution by Market Outlets of Domestic Steel Mill Products in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 32 12. Partial Demand for Domestic Steel Mill Products by Kinds in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 34 13. Projected Demand for Domestic Steel Mill Products in the Six States, 1975 and 1980 Compared with 1967 35 14. Imports of Steel Mill Products by Customs Districts in the Six-State Area, 1960-1967 37 15. Imports of Steel Mill Products, Six-State Area and U. S., 1960-1967 38 16. Steel Mill Products Imported through Customs Districts in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 39 17. Volume of Steel Mill Products Imported through Customs Districts in the Six Southeastern States by Country of Origin, 1967 40 18. Number of Plants and Employment of Steel Fabricating Indus- tries in the Six Southeastern States, 1957 and 1967 41 19. Metal-Using Industries in the Six-State Area with Over 1,000% Gains in Employment between 1957 and 1967 42 20. Percentage Increases in Employment of Steel Fabricating In- dustries in the United States and the Six Southeastern States between 1957 and 1967 43 21. Steel Furnace Facilities in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 44 22. Intermediate Steel Mill Facilities in the Six Southeastern States, 1967 45 23. Selected Steel Finishing Mill Facilities in the Six South- eastern States, 1967 47 Page, Tables (continued) 24. Other Steel Finishing Mill Facilities in the Six South- eastern States, 1967 48 25. Inbound Rail Shipments of Steel Mill Products to the Six Southeastern States, 1964 52 26. Average Rail Freight Rates for Steel Mill Products from Nine Steel Producing Centers to the Six-State Area, 1968 54 27. Rail Freight Costs for Shipping 400,000 Tons of Steel Mill Products from Nine Steel Producing Centers to the Six-State Area, 1968 56 28. Metal Service Centers in the Six-State Area, 1963 57 29. Economic Growth of Georgia and Bordering States, 1950-1966 69 30. Value of Shipments of Household Appliances in the United States, 1958-1967 80 31. Manufacturers' Shipments of Metal Office Furniture in the United States, 1966 81 32. Shipments of Metal Stamping Products in the United States, 1963 92 33. Value of Shipments, Number of Plants, and Employment of Selected Nonelectrical Machinery Product Groups in the United States, 1958, 1963, and 1967 95 Maps 1. Inbound and Outbound Shipments of Steel Mill Products in the Six Southeastern States, 1964 (Based on 1% sample of terminations) 50 2. Railroad Freight Service: Normal Transit Times on Carload Shipments from Atlanta, Georgia 58 3. Transit Times on Direct Truckload Shipments from Atlanta 59 4. Transit Times on Direct Less-than-Truckload Shipments from Atlanta 60 5. One-Day Truckload Service from Six Georgia Cities 61 6. Cities with Non-Stop and Single-Plane Service from Atlanta 63 7. Locations of Plants in the United States with Closed Die Forgings as Their Primary Product, 1966 74 8. Locations of Plants in the United States with Closed Die Forgings as a Secondary Product, 1966 75 9. Locations of Producers of Complete Ball Bearings in the United States, 1966 77 10. Locations of Producers of Complete Roller Bearings in the United States, 1966 78 Page Maps (continued) 11. Locations of Producers of Parts and Components for Ball and Roller Bearings in the United States, 1966 79 12. Locations of Producers of Electric Household Ranges and Ovens in the United States, 1966 82 13. Locations of Producers of Household Refrigerators in the United States, 1966 83 14. Locations of Producers of Home and Farm Freezers in the United States, 1966 84 15. Locations of Producers of Household Washing Machines, Dryers, and Washer-Dryer Combinations in the United States, 1966 85 16. Locations of Producers of Household Vacuum Cleaners in the United States, 1966 86 17. Locations of Producers of Sewing Machines and Parts in the United States, 1966 87 18. Locations of Producers of Household Appliances, Not Else- where Classified, in the United States, 1966 88 19. Locations of Metal Office Furniture Producers in the United States, 1967 90 20. Locations of Producers of Bolts, Nuts, Screws, Rivets, and Washers in the United States, 1967 91 21. Locations of Producers of Metal Stampings in the United States, 1967 94 22. Locations of Producers of Industrial Cranes, Hoists, and Monorails in the United States, 1967 97 23. Locations of Producers of Metal-Forming-Type Machine Tools in the United States, 1967 98 24. Locations of Producers of Printing Machinery and Equipment in the United States, 1967 99 25. Locations of Producers of Motor Vehicle Parts and Acces- sories in the United States, 1967 100 26. Locations of Producers of Locomotives and Parts in the United States, 1967 102 27. Locations of Producers of Photographic Equipment and Sup- plies in the United States, 1967 104 28. Locations of Producers of Toys and Games in the United States, 1967 105 Figures 1. Steel Ingot Production vs. Population in the United States, 1900-1967 5 Page Figures (continued) 2. Indexes of Steel Ingot Production, Industrial Production, and Gross National Product in the United States, 1947-1968 (1957-59 = 100) 6 3. Steel Ingot Production and Shipments and Consumption of Steel Mill Products in the United States, 1954-1968 10 4. Imports and Exports of Steel Mill Products in the United States, 1954-1968 11 i Foreword This latest report of a series which identifies manufacturing opportuni- ties in Georgia is highly significant. It analyzes the potentials of a relatively underdeveloped industry in the Southeast. The manifestation of this underdevelopment is the need to import more than one-half the steel used in the region each year. Twenty-nine different steel fabricating industries are identified as being manufacturing opportunities in Georgia by this study. This report, by identifying the southeastern market potential for steel and specific fabri- cated steel products, highlights the profit opportunities in the manufacturing field. The steel industry is of great importance to the future welfare of the Georgia economy, since it contains the promise, when fully developed, of mate- rially bettering the per capita income of the state.
Recommended publications
  • City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP)
    City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP) Prepared By: Department of Planning and Community Development 55 Trinity Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30303 www.atlantaga.gov DRAFT JUNE 2015 Page is left blank intentionally for document formatting City of Atlanta 2016‐2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and Community Work Program (CWP) June 2015 City of Atlanta Department of Planning and Community Development Office of Planning 55 Trinity Avenue Suite 3350 Atlanta, GA 30303 http://www.atlantaga.gov/indeex.aspx?page=391 Online City Projects Database: http:gis.atlantaga.gov/apps/cityprojects/ Mayor The Honorable M. Kasim Reed City Council Ceasar C. Mitchell, Council President Carla Smith Kwanza Hall Ivory Lee Young, Jr. Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Cleta Winslow Natalyn Mosby Archibong Alex Wan Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 Howard Shook Yolanda Adreaan Felicia A. Moore Council District 7 Council District 8 Council District 9 C.T. Martin Keisha Bottoms Joyce Sheperd Council District 10 Council District 11 Council District 12 Michael Julian Bond Mary Norwood Andre Dickens Post 1 At Large Post 2 At Large Post 3 At Large Department of Planning and Community Development Terri M. Lee, Deputy Commissioner Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director, Office of Planning Project Staff Jessica Lavandier, Assistant Director, Strategic Planning Rodney Milton, Principal Planner Lenise Lyons, Urban Planner Capital Improvements Program Sub‐Cabinet Members Atlanta BeltLine,
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Leary Joined Crescent Communities As President of Its Commercial and Mixed-Use Business Unit in 2014
    BRIAN LEARY, President, Commerical and Mixed-Use Brian Leary joined Crescent Communities as president of its commercial and mixed-use business unit in 2014. In this role, he directs the company's commercial and mixed-use developments across the country with an active investment and develop- ment portfolio in excess of 3 million square feet. Through Brian's 22 years of experi- ence in real estate, he's overseen an excess of $3.5B in development. Prior to joining Crescent, Brian held senior management positions with Jacoby Devel- opment, Inc., Atlanta Beltline, Inc., AIG Global Real Estate, Atlantic Station, LLC and Central Atlanta Progress. As the managing director of Jacoby Development, a national developer of corporate, mixed-use and retail projects, he launched ONE Daytona, a 4.5-million square foot joint venture with International Speedway Corp. Previously Brian served as president and CEO of Atlanta Beltline, Inc., ‐ the organization execut- ing the implementation of the BeltLine, one of the largest, most wide-ranging urban redevelopment projects in the United States. When complete, the $3B+ project will provide a network of public parks, multi-use trails, transit, public art and thousands of units of housing along a historic 22-mile railroad corridor circling Atlanta. While vice president of AIG Global Real Estate, he oversaw the design and develop- ment of Atlantic Station, a 13.5-million square foot joint venture that, at the time, rep- resented the largest urban brownfield redevelopment in the United States and current- ly includes approximately 1.5 million square feet of retail, 1.5 million square feet of LEED-certified Class-A oce, 3,000 residential units and a 120-room hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • ^ ' American Women in Radio & Television
    16TH ANNUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION ^ ' American Women in Radio & Television MARRIOTT MOTOR HOTEL, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, MAY 3-7, 1967 GIFTS PRESIDENT'S PROGRAM HOSPITALITY REGISTRATION JEAN MORTON DOT KIRBY RECEPTION GENERAL CHAIRMAN LILLIAN LEE MARGARET KILIAN AWRT BANttUET MIMI HONCE CAROLYN JOHNSON INFORMATION DEBORAH PULLIN HOSTS ARRANGEMENTS AWILDA LINDSEY ADVERTISING DORA GOSSG HELEN GORE TRANSPORTATION VICE CHAIRMAN PAT McKEMIE PRINTING & POST CONVENTION DORA COSSE HOSPITALITY SUITES PUBLICITY ATLANTA DAY JANE TOGGLE AUDREY JONES ALYSE AYERS LOIS HANEVOLD MARIE DODD 7 ^ ^ . L T r V / , ;> k .> f, /fi< NATIONAL OFFICE: 75 EAST 55TH STREET, NEW YORK 22, N. Y. EASTERN WAREHOUSE Port Elizabeth, N. J. SOPHIE MAE CANDY CORPORATION 317 North Ave., N. E., Atlanta, Ga. 30308 Pounded 1912 by J. BEAUCHAMP COPPEDGE JOHN B. COPPEDGE, President P. O. Box 6202, Station H • AC 404 874-0868 September 12, 1966 Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Ivan: Thank you for the tremendous job that you are doing in representing our city during this crisis. You are certainly to be congratulated on your courage and level headedness. I do not know where we would be without you, and I thank God that we do have you as our Mayor. Sincerely, oppedge JBCzmbr Mr. and Mrs. James D. Stevens 313 OAKLAND STREET DECATUR, GEORGIA 30030 ... ^-ir'k/.r: -.- ' f- t^-rf <1^ ...S^L^eu^ >6;^ .>'''<-t>€c^^ 7^ v^. s •-« Ml .4; N >., .•*K Sanger Old Tjsitt-SiioiTRoacl lattkews, N. C. 28105 \%0<K <mU »i AwiL w { , , 1 , VoUJi. J\S^5AAV<.(i ^ "1/v\Aoua.(I "W )V!aAS w\ \m}f^vvvAy'^"~l 0 ^ V \ 1 V(« ^ " %ci ^ ^M\f(illlA(i "1^'^ \ka,llwWk \.U im OMtl w)Uu (MX ftiio ^ Ifufc WWm4 It^i S ^ ^ »u«wi«\ D« -fc \j(^ 'm.ukW VI 'W'M cma.4 odixW^ \MWiV \/vx(il)i?vS Mltx^k ^Wi- IM VtXjl^ 1 VtW? VW(Mi(| Wx, \^fJ\S.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Market Overview and Trends Analysis September 2017 Development Pipeline - Major Business Districts
    ATLANTA MARKET OVERVIEW AND TRENDS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2017 DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE - MAJOR BUSINESS DISTRICTS 92 ALPHARETTA 985 85 HOSCHTON ACWORTH 275 75 211 N. FULTON NORTH Wrap - 444 units FULTON Garden - 1,020 units JOHNS CREEK ROSWELL AUBURN 19 WINDER 29 RUSSELL 400 MARIETTA PERIMETER LAWRENCEVILLE 120 GWINNETT Wrap - 2,481 units COUNTY SANDY SPRINGS BETHLEHEM 285 PERIMETER CUMBERLAND 29 CUMBERLAND GRAYSON Wrap - 1,386 units SMYRNA(COBB COUNTY) 278 Garden - 266 units 81 BROOKHAVEN 13 85 285 POWDER SPRINGS SNELLVILLE BUCKHEAD BUCKHEADBUCKHEAD LINDBERGH Tower - 3,805 units 85 236 LOGANVILLE 75 Wrap - 682 units 78 Midrise - 1,228 units MABLETON WEST EMORY/ STONE MONROE MIDTOWN CDC MOUNTAIN 78 23 410 20 41 EMORY/ 78 DECATUR W. MIDTOWN MIDTOWN 8 Wrap - 470 units OLD FOURTH WARD DOUGLASVILLE ATLANTA INMAN 20 PARK 20 EAST SIDE154 285 GRANT Tower - 207 units MIDTOWN PARK 285 DOWNTOWNGLENWOOD Wrap - 865 units 278 138 Tower - 5,460 units PARK LITHONIA JERSEY Midrise - 1,165 units 20 11 6 23 85 SOCIAL CAMBELLTON 285 155 CIRCLE 285 70 20 155 COVINGTON UNION CITY MORROW 8 FAIRBURN 41 29 85 STOCKBRIDGE 81 NEWBORN PALMETTO 11 JONESBORO DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE - MAJOR BUSINESS DISTRICTS 92 ALPHARETTA 985 85 HOSCHTON ACWORTH 275 75 211 NORTH FULTON JOHNS CREEK ROSWELL AUBURN 19 WINDER 29 RUSSELL 400 MARIETTA LAWRENCEVILLE 120 GWINNETT GWINNETT COUNTY SANDY SPRINGS Garden - 2,272 units BETHLEHEM 285 PERIMETER 29 CUMBERLAND GRAYSON SMYRNA 278 81 BROOKHAVEN 13 85 285 POWDER SPRINGS SNELLVILLE BUCKHEADBUCKHEAD 85 236 OUTER BURBSLOGANVILLE 75 78 Garden - 3,306 units MABLETON WEST EMORY/ STONE MONROE MIDTOWN CDC MOUNTAIN 78 23 410 20 41 EMORY/ EMORY/DECATUR 78 DECATUR Wrap - 1,754 units MIDTOWN 8 OLD FOURTH WARD DOUGLASVILLE ATLANTA INMAN 20 PARK 20 154 285 GRANT PARK 285 GLENWOOD 278 DOWNTOWNPARK 138 LITHONIA JERSEY 20 11 6 23 85 SOCIAL CAMBELLTON 285 155 CIRCLE 285 70 20 155 COVINGTON UNION CITY MORROW ATLANTA MARKET OVERVIEW AND TRENDS ANALYSIS 9 FAIRBURN 41 29 85 STOCKBRIDGE 81 NEWBORN PALMETTO 11 JONESBORO W.
    [Show full text]
  • Project XL, Site Remediation Efforts, and the Development of the EA
    FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR 17TH STREET EXTENSION [GDOT PROJECT NH-7141-00(900), P.I. NUMBER 714190] AND ATLANTIC STEEL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cooperating Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration An Environmental Assessment of the referenced project has been prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in consultation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA), collectively referred to as the “Federal Agencies”. The document was made available for public inspection as announced in public notices, and comments were invited from all interested parties. Subsequent to the availability of the Environmental Assessment and the comment period, an updated Environmental Assessment was prepared by EPA and has been furnished to FHWA and FTA with the recommendation for a "Finding of No Significant Impact." The Federal Agencies, after reviewing the revised Environmental Assessment, find that the project will have no significant impact on the human or natural environment. No significant impacts on air and water quality or on ambient noise levels are expected. The project is consistent with local plans and will not divide or disrupt a community. The project will have no effect on threatened and endangered species or any resources regulated by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR 17TH STREET EXTENSION [GDOT PROJECT NH-7141-00(900), P.I.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost-Effective GHG Reductions Through Smart Growth & Improved
    A Report by the Center for Clean Air Policy Transportation and Climate Change Program June 2009 Cost -Effective GHG Reductions through Smart Growth & Improved Transportation Choices An economic case for investment of cap-and-trade revenues With assistance from: Steve Winkelman Lilly Shoup, Transportation for America Allison Bishins Will Schroeer, Smart Growth America Chuck Kooshian Deron Lovaas, Natural Resources Defense Council Nathan Sandwick, Natural Resources Defense Council Michael Replogle, Environmental Defense Fund Colin Peppard, Environmental Defense Fund Thomas Gotschi, Rails to Trails Conservancy David Lewis, HDR Inc. About CCAP Since 1985, CCAP has been a recognized world leader in climate and air quality policy and is the only independent, non-profit think-tank working exclusively on those issues at the local, national and international levels. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., CCAP helps policymakers around the world to develop, promote and implement innovative, market-based solutions to major climate, air quality and energy problems that balance both environmental and economic interests. For more information about CCAP, please visit www.ccap.org. For more information on CCAP’s Transportation and Climate Change Program, please see http://www.ccap.org/index.php?component=programs&id=35, or contact: Steve Winkelman, [email protected], or Chuck Kooshian, [email protected]. Center for Clean Air Policy 750 First Street, NE Suite 940 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202.408.9260 Fax: 202.408.8896 Front page photos from left to
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Infill Development on Travel Behavior
    Research in Transportation Economics 67 (2018) 54e67 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Transportation Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/retrec The influence of infill development on travel behavior Louis A. Merlin Florida Atlantic University, USA article info abstract Article history: While the evidence that the built environment can influence travel behavior to date is fairly robust, the Received 2 February 2017 influence of specific, identifiable policy actions is limited. One policy action that can potentially change Received in revised form travel behavior is increasing infill development, particularly if that development is located near the 22 June 2017 center of a major metropolitan region. This study examines the influence of a large-scale, infill devel- Accepted 27 June 2017 opment, Atlantic Station, which opened in 2005 just west of Midtown Atlanta. The study uses propensity Available online 2 February 2018 scores and differences-in-differences research designs to identify how travel patterns changed for new residents and for existing residents of the area around Atlantic Station, respectively. Atlantic Station JEL classification: R41 reduced vehicle miles traveled and increased alternative mode share for its new residents, but it did not reduce the vehicle miles traveled or increase alternative mode share for the existing residents of the area Keywords: around Atlantic Station. Infill development © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Vehicle miles traveled Travel behavior Difference-in-differences 1. Introduction Station development is a large-scale, mixed-use, infill development that occurred on a former brownfield site close to the center of the The goal of reducing vehicular dependence through a supportive Atlanta metropolitan region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation's History
    The Foundation’s History Born in Vernon, Mississippi in 1868 to Wilbur Fisk Glenn Wilbur Fisk Glenn, Jr. and his wife, Hilda, followed and Flora Harper Glenn of Atlanta, Thomas. K. Glenn TKG’s involvement at Scottish Rite Hospital through (TKG) began his career with the Maddox-Rucker Banking the 1970’s and 80’s. In 1974, as the old hospital building Company. At age 34, he was elected vice president of neared its fifth decade of service in the East Lake the Georgia Railway and Electric Company (predecessor section of Atlanta, it was difficult to bring the building of the Georgia Power Company). From 1908 to 1946, up to modern standards. Wilbur Glenn was then a TKG was Chairman of Atlantic Steel Company and member of the Scottish Rite Board of Trustees and succeeded his friend Ernest Woodruff as Chairman of provided funding for construction of the hospital in the Trust Company of Georgia from 1937 to 1946. He was Sandy Springs where it is located today. Hilda spent a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from time and money with various charities; a scholarship 1940 to 1945 and also served as a member of the Advisory at Emory’s School of Nursing bears her name. Committee of the Equal Suffrage Party of Georgia. TKG’s philanthropy was principally focused on health- care. He was elected the first President and Chairman Thomas K. and Agnes Glenn’s of the Governing Board of Scottish Rite Convalescent philanthropy focused on Hospital for Crippled Children in 1915 and served in that healthcare and education.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Atlanta Beltline and Its Associated Historic Resources
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Heritage Preservation Projects Department of History 2006 Beltline: A History of the Atlanta Beltline and its Associated Historic Resources Kadambari Badami Janet Barrickman Adam Cheren Allison Combee Savannah Ferguson See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_heritagepreservation Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Badami, Kadambari; Barrickman, Janet; Cheren, Adam; Combee, Allison; Ferguson, Savannah; Frank, Thomas; Garner, Andy; Hawthorne, Mary Anne; Howell, Hadley; Hutcherson, Carrie; McElreath, Rebekah; Marshall, Cherith; Martin, Rebekah; Morrison, Brandy; Serafine, Bethany; and olberT t, Tiffany, "Beltline: A History of the Atlanta Beltline and its Associated Historic Resources" (2006). Heritage Preservation Projects. 4. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_heritagepreservation/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Heritage Preservation Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Kadambari Badami, Janet Barrickman, Adam Cheren, Allison Combee, Savannah Ferguson, Thomas Frank, Andy Garner, Mary Anne Hawthorne, Hadley Howell, Carrie Hutcherson, Rebekah McElreath, Cherith Marshall, Rebekah Martin, Brandy Morrison, Bethany Serafine,
    [Show full text]
  • Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5
    Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 - Eastside Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Prepared for The City of Atlanta Fulton County and The Atlanta Board of Education by Eastside Atlanta Stakeholders and Huntley & Associates November 2003 Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 12 The Vision 12 Description of the Proposed TAD / Geographic Boundaries (A) 13 Overview of Tax Allocation Districts 13 Tax Increment Financing Spurs Redevelopment 14 Summary of Atlanta TADs 15 Why Eastside Atlanta Qualifies for TAD 18 Key Findings within the Redevelopment Area 20 Rationale for the Proposed Eastside Redevelopment Area and TAD 20 2000 Census Tracts within the Proposed Eastside TAD 20 Market Conditions and Trends (B) 21 Proposed Land Uses and Redevelopment Projects (C) 28 The Vision 28 Strategy and Goals 28 Proposed Private Redevelopment Projects (D) 29 Public Improvements and Additional Economic Catalysts 37 Contractual Relationships (E) 43 Relocation Plans (F) 44 Zoning & Land Use Compatibility (G) 45 Method of Financing / Proposed Public Investments (H) 45 Taxable Valuation for TAD (I) 47 Historic Property within Boundaries of TAD (J) 47 Creation & Termination Dates for TAD (K) 48 Tax Allocation Increment Base & State Certification (M) 48 NOTE: Section and subsection headings listed below that are followed by a (n) denote information specifically required per Georgia Code Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Cats-Report-Small.Pdf
    CENTRAL ATLANTA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword........................................................................................................................1 Study Objectives ........................................................................................................... 2 Study Process ............................................................................................................... 3 Findings and Recommendations................................................................................. 5 Roadway/Parking ................................................................................................. 5 Transit ................................................................................................................ 10 Bike/Pedestrian/Environment ............................................................................. 13 Policy.................................................................................................................. 15 Implementation Action Plan ....................................................................................... 17 Immediate Implementation Projects ................................................................... 17 Second Tier Projects .......................................................................................... 18 Third Tier Projects .............................................................................................. 18 CENTRAL ATLANTA TRANSPORTATION STUDY Foreword Central Atlanta Progress, in conjunction
    [Show full text]