Structural and Biochemical Studies of Alkylpurine Dna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural and Biochemical Studies of Alkylpurine Dna STRUCTURAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF ALKYLPURINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE ALKD By Emily Holtzman Rubinson Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Chemical and Physical Biology May, 2011 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Fredrick P. Guengerich Professor Lawrence J. Marnett Professor Richard Armstrong Professor D. Borden Lacy Professor Brandt F. Eichman For Mom and Dad, thank you for all your love and support ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Brandt Eichman, not only for his unending guidance, support, and encouragement but also for taking the time to teach me how to be a passionate scientist both at the bench and away from it. I am also grateful for the members of the Eichman laboratory especially Audrey Metz, who taught me everything I ever wanted to know about the “art” of crystallography and who initiated me into the world of a formerly unknown glycosylase, AlkD. Also, Briana Greer, a friend and confidant without whom I would have never successfully cloned anything. The past and present members of the lab were not only trusted colleagues but also friends and I thank them all for their help and camaraderie over the years. I also want to thank my committee members, Drs. Fred Guengerich, Larry Marnett, Richard Armstrong, and Borden Lacy for providing advice and insight into my research progress as well as my career development and I want to acknowledge the Toxicology training grant for funding my research for the past four years. I would also like to acknowledge the faculty and staff with Chemical and Physical Biology program including Lindsay Meyers for all her help during my time at Vanderbilt. I would also like to thank my family, intermediate and beyond, especially my parents and my brothers Paul, Max, and Claude, for their love and support. I know with them in my corner I can accomplish anything. And finally, I want to thank my friends for keeping me sane throughout this process. I will carry great memories of my time at Vanderbilt and in Nashville with me forever. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... xii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 Overview of DNA Damage .....................................................................................2 Endogenous DNA Damage ..........................................................................2 Exogenous DNA Damage ............................................................................6 DNA Repair of Single-stranded Adducts ................................................................8 Direct Damage Reversal ..............................................................................9 Base Excision Repair .................................................................................10 Nucleotide Excision Repair .......................................................................13 Mismatch Repair ........................................................................................14 DNA Glycosylases .................................................................................................15 Recognition of DNA Damage ....................................................................16 Substrate Specificity and Catalytic Mechanism of DNA Glycosylases ....18 Structural Superfamilies of DNA Glycosylases ....................................................19 T4 Endonuclease V Superfamily ...............................................................19 Uracil DNA Glycosylase Superfamily .......................................................20 Helix-Hairpin-Helix Superfamily ..............................................................23 Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase Superfamily ...........................................26 Helix-Two Turn-Helix Superfamily ..........................................................26 Tandem Helical Repeat Superfamily .........................................................28 Alkylation Damage Response ................................................................................28 The Adaptive Response to Alkylation Damage .........................................29 Alkylpurine DNA Glycosylases ................................................................31 Structural and Biochemical Highlights of Selected Alkylpurine DNA Glycosylases ..............................................................................................32 Scope of this Work.................................................................................................39 II. A NEW PROTEIN ARCHITECTURE FOR PROCESSING ALKYLATION DAMAGED DNA: THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF DNA iv GLYCOSYLASE ALKD.......................................................................................41 Summary ................................................................................................................41 Introduction ............................................................................................................42 Results ....................................................................................................................43 The Structure of AlkD ...............................................................................43 Putative Active Site....................................................................................47 The Variant HEAT Motif ...........................................................................50 A DNA Binding Model .............................................................................52 Discussion ..............................................................................................................56 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................59 AlkD Purification and Crystallization .......................................................59 X-ray Data Collection, Phasing, and Structure Refinement ......................60 Glycosylase Activity Assay .......................................................................62 DNA Binding Assay ..................................................................................62 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................63 III. AN UNPRECEDENTED NUCLEIC ACID CAPTURE MECHANISM FOR EXCISION OF DNA DAMAGE ..........................................................................64 Summary ................................................................................................................64 Introduction ............................................................................................................65 Results ....................................................................................................................67 A New Architecture for Binding Nucleic Acids ........................................67 A Novel Lesion Capture Mechanism .........................................................70 AlkD Traps and Restructures Destabilized Base Pairs ..............................75 Base Excision by Solvent Exposure .........................................................78 Discussion ..............................................................................................................80 Methods Summary .................................................................................................83 Preparation of 3-deaza-3-methyladenine ..................................................83 AlkD/DNA Crystal Structure Determination ............................................83 Biochemical Assays ..................................................................................84 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................84 Author Contributions .............................................................................................85 Author Information ................................................................................................85 Methods..................................................................................................................85 AlkD Purification and Crystallization ......................................................85 X-ray Data Collection, Phasing, and Structure Refinement .....................86 Enzyme Activity .......................................................................................88 POB Adduct Excision ...............................................................................89 DNA Binding ............................................................................................91 IV. COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF DNA BINDING AND RECOGNITION BY ALKD..................................................................................93 Summary ................................................................................................................93
Recommended publications
  • Characterisation of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Opacity Phase Variation
    Characterisation of Streptococcus pneumoniae Opacity Phase Variation Melissa Hui Chieh Chai, BBiomedSc (Hon), MSc A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Adelaide February 2016 Research Centre for Infectious Diseases Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology The University of Adelaide Adelaide, S.A., Australia Table of Contents Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1 1.1 The Pneumococcus ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Burden of Disease .................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Antimicrobial resistance ........................................................................................ 3 1.2 Pneumococcal Vaccines ............................................................................................... 4 1.3 Pathogenesis of Pneumococcal Disease ....................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Pneumococcal colonisation.................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Progression to disease .......................................................................................... 10 1.4 S. pneumoniae Virulence Factors ............................................................................... 11 1.4.1 Pneumococcal capsule ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deoxyguanosine Depurination and Yield DNA–Protein Cross-Links in Nucleosome Core Particles and Cells
    Histone tails decrease N7-methyl-2′-deoxyguanosine depurination and yield DNA–protein cross-links in nucleosome core particles and cells Kun Yanga, Daeyoon Parkb, Natalia Y. Tretyakovac, and Marc M. Greenberga,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; bDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55417; and cDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55417 Edited by Cynthia J. Burrows, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved October 18, 2018 (received for review August 6, 2018) Monofunctional alkylating agents preferentially react at the adducts. DPC formation between histone proteins and MdG was N7 position of 2′-deoxyguanosine in duplex DNA. Methylated also observed in MMS-treated V79 Chinese hamster lung cells. DNA, such as that produced by methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) Intracellular DPC formation from MdG could have significant and temozolomide, exists for days in organisms. The predominant biological effects. consequence of N7-methyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (MdG) is widely be- Compared with other DNA lesions, MdG minimally perturbs lieved to be abasic site (AP) formation via hydrolysis, a process duplex structure (12). The steric effects of N7-methylation within that is slow in free DNA. Examination of MdG reactivity within the major groove are minimal, and the aromatic planar structure nucleosome core particles (NCPs) provided two general observa- is maintained. Although the Watson–Crick hydrogen bonding tions. MdG depurination rate constants are reduced in NCPs com- pattern of dG is retained, recent structural studies raise the pared with when the identical DNA sequence is free in solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism of Nucleotide Flipping by Human Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase
    Mechanism of Nucleotide Flipping by Human Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase by Jenna M. Hendershot A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Biological Chemistry) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Patrick J. O’Brien, Chair Professor Hashim M. Al-Hashimi, Duke University Professor Carol A. Fierke Associate Professor Bruce A. Palfey Associate Professor Raymond C. Trievel © Jenna M. Hendershot 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures.………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………… iii List of Tables.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. vi List of Appendices.…….....…………………………………………………………………………………………….. vii List of Abbreviations..………………………………………………………………………………………………….. viii Abstract...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. xi Chapter (1) Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 (2) Substitution of Active Site Tyrosines with Tryptophan Alters the Free Energy for Nucleotide Flipping by Human Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase.………..……. 18 (3) Critical Role of DNA Intercalation in Enzyme-Catalyzed Nucleotide Flipping… 58 (4) Evidence for Early Intercalation during the Search for DNA Damage by Human Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase………………………………..………………………. 94 (5) Structure/Function Analysis of Intercalation and Nucleotide Flipping in Human Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase….…………………………………………………….. 124 (6) Conclusions and Future Directions……….………………………………………………………. 155 ii List of Figures Figure 1.1: Nucleotide flipping………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Relationship Between Measles Virus Fusion
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2006-05-17 Characterization of the Relationship Between Measles Virus Fusion, Receptor Binding, and the Virus-Specific Interaction Between the Hemagglutinin and Fusion Glycoproteins: a Dissertation Elizabeth Ann Corey University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins Commons, Cells Commons, Chemical Actions and Uses Commons, Lipids Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Repository Citation Corey EA. (2006). Characterization of the Relationship Between Measles Virus Fusion, Receptor Binding, and the Virus-Specific Interaction Between the Hemagglutinin and Fusion Glycoproteins: a Dissertation. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/hg2y-0r35. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/221 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEASLES VIRUS FUSION , RECEPTOR BINDING , AND THE VIRUS-SPECIFIC INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HEMAGGLUTININ AND FUSION GL YCOPROTEINS A Dissertation Presented Elizabeth Anne Corey Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to Nature
    letters to nature Received 7 July; accepted 21 September 1998. 26. Tronrud, D. E. Conjugate-direction minimization: an improved method for the re®nement of macromolecules. Acta Crystallogr. A 48, 912±916 (1992). 1. Dalbey, R. E., Lively, M. O., Bron, S. & van Dijl, J. M. The chemistry and enzymology of the type 1 27. Wolfe, P. B., Wickner, W. & Goodman, J. M. Sequence of the leader peptidase gene of Escherichia coli signal peptidases. Protein Sci. 6, 1129±1138 (1997). and the orientation of leader peptidase in the bacterial envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 12073±12080 2. Kuo, D. W. et al. Escherichia coli leader peptidase: production of an active form lacking a requirement (1983). for detergent and development of peptide substrates. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 303, 274±280 (1993). 28. Kraulis, P.G. Molscript: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. 3. Tschantz, W. R. et al. Characterization of a soluble, catalytically active form of Escherichia coli leader J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946±950 (1991). peptidase: requirement of detergent or phospholipid for optimal activity. Biochemistry 34, 3935±3941 29. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A. & Honig, B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and (1995). the thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 11, 281±296 (1991). 4. Allsop, A. E. et al.inAnti-Infectives, Recent Advances in Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationships 30. Meritt, E. A. & Bacon, D. J. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol. 277, 505± (eds Bently, P. H. & O'Hanlon, P. J.) 61±72 (R. Soc. Chem., Cambridge, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • 3-Methyladenine DNA Glycosylases: Structure, Function, and Biological Importance Michael D
    Review articles 3-Methyladenine DNA glycosylases: structure, function, and biological importance Michael D. Wyatt,1 James M. Allan,1 Albert Y. Lau,2 Tom E. Ellenberger,2 and Leona D. Samson1* Summary The genome continuously suffers damage due to its reactivity with chemical and physical agents. Finding such damage in genomes (that can be several million to several billion nucleotide base pairs in size) is a seemingly daunting task. 3-Methyladenine DNA glycosylases can initiate the base excision repair (BER) of an extraordinarily wide range of substrate bases. The advantage of such broad substrate recognition is that these enzymes provide resistance to a wide variety of DNA damaging agents; however, under certain circumstances, the eclectic nature of these enzymes can confer some biological disadvantages. Solving the X-ray crystal struc- tures of two 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases, and creating cells and animals altered for this activity, contributes to our understanding of their enzyme mechanism and how such enzymes influence the biological response of organisms to several different types of DNA damage. BioEssays 21:668–676, 1999. ௠ 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction ately interpreted by DNA-processing enzymes. Unfortunately, DNA carries life’s genetic information encoded in the arrange- these bases are also chemically reactive, and the inevitable ment of bases along the length of the DNA molecule. Each base modifications produce a variety of biological outcomes, DNA base has a distinct chemical structure that is appropri- depending on how a cell recognizes and responds to the modification. Cellular DNA repair mechanisms target these inappropriate DNA structures, and play a vital role in maintain- 1Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Harvard School of Public Health, ing genomic integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Diversity of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Superfamily
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations December 2017 The Evolutionary Diversity of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Superfamily Jing Li Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Li, Jing, "The Evolutionary Diversity of Uracil DNA Glycosylase Superfamily" (2017). All Dissertations. 2546. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2546 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTIONARY DIVERSITY OF URACIL DNA GLYCOSYLASE SUPERFAMILY A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Biochemistry and Molecular Biology by Jing Li December 2017 Accepted by: Dr. Weiguo Cao, Committee Chair Dr. Alex Feltus Dr. Cheryl Ingram-Smith Dr. Jeremy Tzeng ABSTRACT Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) is a crucial member in the base excision (BER) pathway that is able to specially recognize and cleave the deaminated DNA bases, including uracil (U), hypoxanthine (inosine, I), xanthine (X) and oxanine (O). Currently, based on the sequence similarity of 3 functional motifs, the UDG superfamily is divided into 6 families. Each family has evolved distinct substrate specificity and properties. In this thesis, I broadened the UDG superfamily by characterization of three new groups of enzymes. In chapter 2, we identified a new subgroup of enzyme in family 3 SMUG1 from Listeria Innocua. This newly found SMUG1-like enzyme has distinct catalytic residues and exhibits strong preference on single-stranded DNA substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Base Excision Repair of DNA Damage by the Non‐Base‐Flipping
    Published online: October 20, 2017 Article Selective base excision repair of DNA damage by the non-base-flipping DNA glycosylase AlkC Rongxin Shi1 , Elwood A Mullins1, Xing-Xing Shen1, Kori T Lay2, Philip K Yuen2, Sheila S David2, Antonis Rokas1 & Brandt F Eichman1,* Abstract and strand breaks (Wyatt & Pittman, 2006; Krokan & Bjøra˚s, 2013). The toxicity of these DNA lesions is the basis for the use of alkylat- DNA glycosylases preserve genome integrity and define the speci- ing agents in cancer chemotherapy (Sedgwick, 2004). To avoid the ficity of the base excision repair pathway for discreet, detrimental toxic effects of DNA alkylation and maintain integrity of their modifications, and thus, the mechanisms by which glycosylases genomes, all organisms possess multiple repair mechanisms to locate DNA damage are of particular interest. Bacterial AlkC and remove the diversity of alkyl-DNA modifications. Nucleotide AlkD are specific for cationic alkylated nucleobases and have a excision repair (NER) is the predominant mechanism to eliminate distinctive HEAT-like repeat (HLR) fold. AlkD uses a unique non- helix-distorting and bulky adducts, whereas small nucleobase base-flipping mechanism that enables excision of bulky lesions modifications (e.g., methyl, etheno groups) are repaired by direct more commonly associated with nucleotide excision repair. In reversal or base excision repair (BER) pathways (Sedgwick, 2004; contrast, AlkC has a much narrower specificity for small lesions, Reardon & Sancar, 2005; Mishina & He, 2006). N1-methyladenine principally N3-methyladenine (3mA). Here, we describe how AlkC (1mA) and N3-methylcytosine (3mC), predominant in single- selects for and excises 3mA using a non-base-flipping strategy stranded (ss) DNA and RNA, are demethylated by the AlkB family distinct from that of AlkD.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Regulation of the Er Stress Response by the Dna Repair Enzyme Aag
    DECIPHERING THE CROSSTALK: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE REGULATION OF THE ER STRESS RESPONSE BY THE DNA REPAIR ENZYME AAG Clara Forrer Charlier Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Department of Biochemistry and Physiology This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2018 DECIPHERING THE CROSSTALK: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE REGULATION OF THE ER STRESS RESPONSE BY THE DNA REPAIR ENZYME AAG- Clara Forrer Charlier – June 2018 SUMMARY The genome is a very dynamic store of genetic information and constantly threatened by endogenous and exogenous damaging agents. To maintain fidelity of the information stored, several robust and overlapping repair pathways, such as the Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway, have evolved. The main BER glycosylase responsible for repairing alkylation DNA damage is the alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG). Repair initiated by AAG can lead to accumulation of cytotoxic intermediates. Here, we report the involvement of AAG in the elicitation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), a mechanism triggered to restore proteostasis in the cell whose dysfunction is implicated in diseases like diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer. Firstly, we determined that not only human ARPE-19 cells were capable of eliciting the UPR, but that an alkylating agent, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), also triggers the response, and that in the absence of AAG the response is greatly diminished. Our luciferase reporter assay indicates that the response is activated on multiple branches (IRE1 and ATF6) on both AAG-proficient and deficient cells. Although no transcriptional induction of UPR markers was detected by RT-qPCR at 6 hours post MMS treatment, preliminary western-blot data at 6 and 24h, show activation of key UPR markers (p-eIF2α, BiP and XBP-1) upon MMS treatment in wild-type cells and little or no activation on AAG -/-.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Heat-Like Repeat Superfamily of Dna Glycosylases
    CHARACTERIZATION OF HEAT-LIKE REPEAT SUPERFAMILY OF DNA GLYCOSYLASES By Rongxin Shi Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Biological Sciences June 30, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Katherine L. Friedman, Ph.D. Todd Graham, Ph.D. Carmelo Rizzo, Ph.D. Benjamin Spiller, Ph.D. Brandt F. Eichman, Ph.D. To My Beloved Husband Jun, Dear and Loving Mom, Changfen, and Dad, Feng, Thank You for All Your Love and Support ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank my Ph.D. supervisor, Dr. Brandt Eichman for his enormous support, encouragement and guidance throughout my graduate study. His passion in science always inspires me and his talent in research tells me what a great scientist is. Besides science, I would like to express my heartfelt thanks for his support in my career development. I could not finish my graduate study and be prepared for my future career without his guidance and support. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee members: Drs. Katherine Friedman, Todd Graham, Carmelo Rizzo, and Benjamin Spiller, not only for their intellectual guidance on my research projects, but also for their supportive contributions to my personal career development. I want to thank all my wonderful current and previous lab members for project and emotional support that helps me get through the challenges in research, work and life. I especially thank Dr. Elwood Mullins for mentoring me when I first joined the lab and offering assistance on my dissertation project.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Unique Features of Several Microbial Α-Amylases Active on Soluble and Native Starch Sarian, Fean Davisu
    University of Groningen Unique features of several microbial α-amylases active on soluble and native starch Sarian, Fean Davisunjaya IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2016 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Sarian, F. D. (2016). Unique features of several microbial α-amylases active on soluble and native starch. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenesis of Streptococcus Pneumoniae
    PPaatthhooggeenneessiiss ooff SSttrreeppttooccooccccuuss ppnneeuummoonniiaaee Lauren Joy McAllister, BSc (Mol. Biol.), BSc (Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Adelaide May, 2010 Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Molecular & Biomedical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia This thesis is dedicated to my mother, and sisters Janine and Suzanne. Page | i Table of Contents Abstract ·············································································· x Declaration ········································································ xiii Acknowledgements ···························································· xiv List of Abbreviations ·························································· xvii Chapter 1: General Introduction 1.1 Historical Background ··························································································· 1 1.2 Pneumococcal Disease ························································································· 3 1.3 Pneumococcal Virulence ······················································································· 6 1.3.1 The pneumococcal capsule ····················································································· 8 1.3.2 Serotype, sequence type and genome ······································································· 9 1.3.3 Virulence proteins ··································································································
    [Show full text]