DOCSLIB.ORG

Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management: Perspectives from Four Yukon First Nations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management: Perspectives from Four Yukon First Nations Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management: Perspectives from Four Yukon First Nations IPINCH Case Study Report by Carcross/Tagish First Nation, Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, Ta’an Kwach’an Council, and Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in in collaboration with Sheila Greer (Consultant to Champagne and Aishihik First Nations) and Catherine Bell (University of Alberta, Faculty of Law) January 2016 IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 Attribution and Copyright Notice CCM Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs CC‐BY ‐NC‐ND www.sfu.ca/IPinCH This research was made possible, in part, through the support of the Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) project, a Major Collaborative Research Initiative funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. IPinCH explores the rights, values, and responsibilities associated with material culture, cultural knowledge and the practice of heritage research. Other project funders included: Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, Carcross‐Tagish First Nation, Ta’an Kwach’an Council, Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in, and Sheila C. Greer Consulting. Report To Be Cited As: Carcross‐Tagish First Nation, Champagne & Aishihik First Nations, Ta’an Kwach’an Council, Tr’ondek Hwech’in First Nation, Sheila Greer, and Catherine Bell (2015), Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management: Perspectives from Four Yukon First Nations. ii IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 SOME OF OUR WORDS Anything and everything you do, the way you live is your heritage. I walk it, that’s who I am. Angie Joseph‐Rear, TH Session, August 4, 2012. — a citizen and former chief of the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in. Our people want to learn to dance and sing, it sparks the life within them. If we work together it can be achieved, we can keep our language and culture alive. A big part is respect. If we are really going to learn our culture and heritage we have to start with respect; that’s a key, fundamental issue. Andy Carville, March 1, 2005, Tending the Fire Conference (Summary Document, p. 20). — a Carcross/Tagish First Nation citizen, and former Grand Chief of the Council for Yukon First Nations. This chapter is one of the most important chapters because it can be the essence and tool, a way to teach our children where they come from and who they are as First Nations people. Xíxch’ Tlà (Diane Strand), March 1, 2005, Tending the Fire Conference (Summary Document, p. 11). — a citizen and former chief of the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations. Heritage is our lives, it is what we are. We are First Nations people who have been watered down and watered down until some of us don’t look First Nations but we still are. Frances Woolsey, TKC Session July 31, 2012. —an Elder of the Taan Kwäch’än Council. Our Words in Song There was always something under the surface – yeah Trying to reach out, take root and find me I’ve got a history and a story that’s yet untold I can hear it now, hear it now the words my old people say. – lyrics from “The Breaking Point” (song), from CD The Breaking Point. Singer Songwriter Diyet (a citizen of Kluane First Nation, Burwash Landing, Yukon). It’s up to me, no it’s up to us. Together it gets better on every letter. I speak, the drum I trust. Lyrics, “86 Heaven.” Rap Artist Warren Strand (Yäwatà) (a citizen of Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, Haines Junction, Yukon) iii IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Some of Our Words iii Our Words in Song Iii Table of Contents iv Acknowledgements vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Background and Context to the Present Study 3 2.1 Who We Are 3 Figure 1, Map Showing Traditional Territory of the Four Yukon First Nations 4 Study Participants 2.2 Chapter 13 Heritage of the Yukon Land Claim Agreements 6 The Objectives of Chapter 13 7 2.3 Other, Intersecting Legislation Affecting Heritage 9 2.4 Previous Considerations of YFN Heritage and Heritage Values 9 Select Quotes from the 2005 “Tending the Fire” Conference 11 CTFN’s Book of Statutes – Traditional Beliefs and Practices 12 2.5 Yukon First Nations Heritage Programs 13 Carcross/Tagish First Nation 13 Champagne & Aishihik First Nations 16 Ta’an Kwach’an Council 16 Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in 17 2.6 The Multi‐Government Heritage Resource Manual Effort 18 2.7 More Recent Yukon First Nations Collective Work on Heritage 18 Select Quotes from the Yukon First Nations Heritage Caucus Sessions 19 3. Methodology 20 3.1 Objectives, Design and Implementation 20 3.2 Workshop Sessions, Focus Groups, Interviews and Participants 22 3.3 Report Preparation 27 3.4 Inherent Limits and Challenges to Our Methodology 29 4. What We Asked and A Sampling of What Was Heard 33 What Does “Heritage of Yukon First Nations” Mean to You? 33 On Activities and Heritage Value/Values 35 On Place & Heritage Value/Values 37 On Taking Care of Culturally Important Places 39 On Material Culture and Heritage Value/Values 42 On Taking Care of Culturally Important Things 43 5. Further Insights 44 On Heritage Today, Education 44 On Role of FN Governments in Heritage Management 46 More on Culturally Important Places 48 More on Material Culture 50 6. Analysis 52 6.1 General Comments & Vocabulary Insights 53 6.2 Stewardship and Responsibility 55 iv IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 6.3 Heritage as Community 56 6.4 Spirituality in Heritage 57 6.5 Heritage as Holistic and Intimately Connected to the Land 58 6.6 Tangible and Intangible 59 6.7 Heritage Management as Knowledge Sharing 60 6.8 Culturally Significant Places 62 6.9 Relationships and Relatedness 65 6.10 Art, Material Culture & Culturally Important Things 68 6.11 Yukon First Nation Governments Heritage Policy and Practice 70 7. Conclusions – Collaborative Stewardship 72 8. References Cited 76 Appendix A ‐ Chapter 13 of the Umbrella Yukon Final Agreement 80 Appendix B ‐ Study Participant Consent Form 88 Appendix C ‐ Program “From Values to Policy and Legislation Breaking Trail in 89 a Heritage Self‐Governing Context”, March 22, 2013 Workshop Appendix D ‐ Original Set of Questions Presented to Participants 90 Appendix E – TH Collections Policy 93 Appendix F – TH Heritage Resources Best Practices 110 v IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research leading to this report has been a shared experience exploring and learning about, as well as articulating, Yukon First Nations’ (YFN) values, laws, and heritage stewardship, their interface with Canadian laws and heritage norms, and their implications for a heritage management framework based on YFN values and culture. Its design and implementation was developed by the Champagne and Aishihik (CAFN), Carcross/Tagish (CTFN), Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in (TH), and the Ta'an Kwach'an Council (TKC), in collaboration with Sheila Greer (Heritage Consultant for CAFN), Catherine Bell (Professor of Law, University of Alberta), and the Intellectual Property in Cultural Heritage (IPinCH) project. Extending over a period of four years, this research would not have been possible without the guidance and knowledge of the YFN Elders acknowledged below; the support and encouragement of Diane Strand (Director, Dept. of Language, Culture & Heritage and former Chief CAFN), Mark Wedge (Elder and former Khà Shâde Héni [Chief] CTFN), and Jackie Olson (Executive Director and former Director, Department of Heritage, TH); and the vision and dedication of YFN heritage staff Paula Banks (Parks Planning & Heritage Liaison, Lands and Resources Dept. CAFN), Heather Jones (Heritage Manager CAFN), Jody Beaumont (Traditional Knowledge Specialist TH), Betsy Jackson (Elder, former Heritage Manager TKC), Sheila Joe Quock (Heritage Officer CAFN), and Mark Nelson (former Heritage Manager TKC). Of particular significance are the contributions of the many individuals who shared history, knowledge, and ways with one of us (SG) over the past 35 years, as well as more directly the Elders, youth, and other YFN community members who agreed to speak directly with us specifically for this project. Your knowledge and experience enables us not only to facilitate respect for, and greater understanding of, concerns relating to protection and control of YFN heritage, but also demonstrates the importance of recognizing and respecting unique features of every Yukon First Nation. In particular, we acknowledge the contributions of the following people who participated in interviews and focus group discussions: Carcross/Tagish First Nation: We respectfully acknowledge the following Elders and community members who shared their time, knowledge and contributions: Elder Annie Austen, Elder Bill Barrett, Elder Patrick James, Beverly Sembsmoen, Ralph Sembsmoen, Keith Wolfe Smarch, Elder Mark Wedge, Elder Ted Hall, and Elder Art Johns. Champagne and Aishihik First Nations: We respectfully acknowledge the following youth, heritage staff, and citizens who shared their time, knowledge and contributions: Elder Lorraine Allen, Paula Banks, Elder Frances Oles, Candice Boyle, Michelle Dawson‐Beattie, Nadia Joe, Sheila Joe Quock, Chase Smith‐ Tutin, Harry Smith, and Amanda Workman. Ta'an Kwach'an Council: We respectfully acknowledge the following Elders who shared their time, knowledge, ideas, and concerns: Norman Adamson, Gail Anderson, Sam Broeren, Louise Clethroe, Marion Irvine, Betsy Jackson, James Miller, and Frances Woolsey. Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in: We respectfully acknowledge the following Elders, heritage staff and citizens who shared their time, knowledge and contributions: Elder Angie Joseph‐Rear, Jackie Olson, Georgette McLeod, Jody Beaumont, and Allie Winton. vi IPinCH ‐ Yukon First Nations Heritage Values and Resource Management Report – March 2016 We also acknowledge Vera Asp, a citizen of the Tahltan Central Council and professional archaeologist, who assisted in clarifying issues raised during the Ta’an Kwach’an Council Elders session.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Nations & Transboundary Claimants
    How to Contact Yukon First Nations & Transboundary Claimants Carcross/Tagish First Nation Kaska Ta’an Kwäch’än Council Box 130 Liard First Nation 117 Industrial Road Carcross, YT Y0B 1B0 Box 328 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2T8 Location: Turn off Klondike Hwy at Watson Lake, YT Y0A 1C0 Tel (867) 668-3613 south end of bridge Location: On Campbell Hwy, across Fax (867) 667-4295 Tel (867) 821-4251 from high school/Yukon College Tel (867) 821-8216 – Lands Admin. Tel (867) 536-5200 – Administration Teslin Tlingit Council Fax (867) 821-4802 Tel (867) 536-2912 – Land Claims Fax (867) 536-2109 Box 133 Teslin, YT Y0A 1B0 Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Ross River Dena Council Location: On southwest side of General Delivery Alaska Highway Box 5309 Ross River, YT Y0B 1S0 Tel (867) 390-2532 – Administration Haines Junction, YT Y0B 1L0 Location: Near Dena General Store Tel (867) 390-2005 – Lands Location: Turn off Alaska Hwy, Tel (867) 969-2278 – Administration Fax (867) 390-2204 across from FasGas, follow signs Tel (867) 969-2832 – Economic Tel (867) 634-2288 – Administration Development Fax (867) 969-2405 Tetlit Gwich’in Council Tel (867) 634-4211 – Ren. Res. Mgr. Fax (867) 634-2108 Box 30 Little Salmon/Carmacks Fort MacPherson, NWT X0E 0J0 In Whitehorse: First Nation Location: On Tetlit Gwichin Road #100 – 304 Jarvis Street Tel (867) 952-2330 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2H2 Box 135 Fax (867) 952-2212 Tel (867) 668-3627 Carmacks, YT Y0B 1C0 Fax (867) 667-6202 Location: Turn west off Klondike Hwy at north end of bridge to admin bldg Tr’ondëk Hwëch'in Inuvialuit Regional Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement
    THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION FINAL AGREEMENT among THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE YUKON Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2005 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca 1-800-567-9604 TTY only 1-866-553-0554 QS-5384-000-EE-A1 Catalogue: R2-427/1-2005E-PDF ISBN:0-662-42156-6 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada Cette publication peut aussi être obtenue en français sous le titre: Entente définitive de la Première nation des Carcross/Tagish The preceding Elders' Statement does not form part of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement. AGREEMENT made this 22nd day of October, 2005. AMONG: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (hereinafter referred to as "Canada"); AND The Carcross/Tagish First Nation as represented by the Khà Shâde Héni of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation (hereinafter referred to as the "Carcross/Tagish First Nation"); AND The Government of the Yukon as represented by the Government Leader of the Yukon on behalf of the Yukon (hereinafter referred to as the "Yukon"), being the parties to this Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "this Agreement"). WHEREAS: the Carcross/Tagish First Nation asserts aboriginal rights, titles and interests with respect to its Traditional Territory; the Carcross/Tagish First Nation wishes to retain, subject to this Agreement, the aboriginal rights, titles and
    [Show full text]
  • A Guidebook for Native Language Instructors
    A Guidebook for Native Language Instructors Developed by: Collyne Bunn Doug Hitch Jo-Anne Johnson John Ritter Gertie Tom Margaret Workman Ted Harrison Evelyn Kirkaldy Second Edition Whitehorse, Yukon, 2003 Foreword to the Second Edition Since its original publication in 1980, Teaching Yukon Native Languages: A Guidebook for Native Language Instructors, has been used extensively in Native Language classrooms not only in the Yukon, but also in Alaska, the Northwest Territories, British Columbia and Alberta. The Yukon Native Language Centre has received many positive comments on the usefulness of this guide from instructors in the field. The pioneering effort has served as the model for other guides such as the three Carrier versions developed by the Yinka Dene Language Institute (Teaching Athapaskan Languages: A Guidebook for Native Language Instructors, 1990). Also since 1980, the conversation examples throughout the guide have been translated and recorded in all Yukon languages, and usually in several dialects. Twenty-six versions of the conversational Language Lessons are available as booklet and tape sets from the Yukon Native Language Centre. Besides versions in the Yukon languages Gwich'in, Hän, Upper Tanana, Northern Tutchone, Southern Tutchone, Kaska, Tagish and Tlingit, there are also versions from Lower Tanana, Upper Tanana, and Tanacross from Alaska. These local dialect booklets and tapes increase the effectiveness of the Guidebook. Beginning in 2002, the same material, both text and sound, as well as new colour images, has begun to appear on the Centre's web site as the Centre makes use of new technologies to improve native language teaching and documentation. The original version of the Guidebook was developed by Collyne Bunn, John Ritter and Gertie Tom of the Yukon Native Languages Project, which has evolved into the Yukon Native Language Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Water Governance, Ontologies, and the Politics Of
    Article Nature and Space Environment and Planning E: Nature and Respecting water: Space 0(0) 1–23 ! The Author(s) 2018 Indigenous water Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav governance, ontologies, DOI: 10.1177/2514848618789378 and the politics of kinship journals.sagepub.com/home/ene on the ground Nicole J Wilson University of British Columbia, Canada Jody Inkster University of Alberta/Yukon College, Canada Abstract Indigenous peoples often view water as a living entity or a relative, to which they have a sacred responsibility. Such a perspective frequently conflicts with settler societies’ view of water as a ‘‘resource’’ that can be owned, managed, and exploited. Although rarely articulated explicitly, water conflicts are rooted in ontological differences between Indigenous and settler views of water. Furthermore, the unequal water governance landscape created by settler colonialism has perpetuated the suppression of Indigenous ways of conceptualizing water. This paper thus examines the ‘‘political ontology’’ of water by drawing on insights from the fields of critical Indigenous studies, post-humanism, and water governance. Additionally, we engage a case study of four Yukon First Nations (Carcross/Tagish, Kluane, Tr’onde¨kHwe¨ch’in, and White River First Nations) in the Canadian North to examine their water ontologies through the lens of a politics of kinship including ideas about ‘‘respecting water.’’ We also examine the assumptions of settler- colonial water governance in the territory, shaped by modern land claims and self-government agreements. We close by discussing the implications of Indigenous water ontologies for alternate modes of governing water. Keywords Indigenous law, indigenous water governance, ontological politics, Yukon First Nations, Yukon, Canada Introduction We respect not only the water we utilize, we respect the land around it because it feeds into the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Selkirk: Early Contact Period Interaction Between the Northern Tutchone and the Hudson’S Bay Company in Yukon
    Archaeology Programme Government of the Yukon Hude¸ Hudän Series Occasional Papers in Archaeology No. 17 FORT SELKIRK: EARLY CONTACT PERIOD INTERACTION BETWEEN THE NORTHERN TUTCHONE AND THE HUDSON’S BAY COMPANY IN YUKON Victoria Elena Castillo Yukon Archaeology Programme Hude*\ Huda†n Series Occasional Papers in Archaeology Hude*\ Huda†n—Long Ago People (Northern Tutchone) Editorial Committee Chair: Jeff Hunston Manager, Heritage Resources Production Manager: Ruth Gotthardt Archaeologist, Yukon Archaeology Programme Production Assistant: Greg Hare Senior Projects Archaeologist, Yukon Archaeology Programme Objectives of the Series The Occasional Papers in Archaeology Series is designed to provide for the timely dissemination of technical reports, conference workshop proceedings, and dissertations relating to archaeological research in the Yukon. The publication of these materials contributes to the realization of Yukon Tourism and Culture’s heritage programming mandate: to develop, enhance and preserve the Yukon’s heritage resources and communicate an appreciation and understanding of the Yukon’s heritage to Yukoners and Yukon visitors. In order to expedite timely publication of research results and keep publication costs to a minimum, manuscripts are submitted ready for printing. Errors are the responsibility of the author(s). Archaeology Programme Government of Yukon OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 17 FORT SELKIRK: EARLY CONTACT PERIOD INTERACTION BETWEEN THE NORTHERN TUTCHONE AND THE HUDSON’S BAY COMPANY IN YUKON Victoria Elena
    [Show full text]
  • Once the Land Is for Certain: the Selkirk First Nation Approach To
    ONCE THE LAND IS FOR CERTAIN: THE SELKIRK FIRST NATION APPROACH TO LAND MANAGEMENT, 1997-2007 A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In the Department of Native Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By ANNE MARIE MEASE Copyright Anne Marie Mease, December 2008. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Native Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C8 i ABSTRACT In July 1997 Selkirk First Nation Citizens or Selkirk First Nation Peoples in the community of Pelly Crossing, Yukon signed the Selkirk First Nation Final Land Claims Agreement (Modern Day Treaty) and the Selkirk First Nation Self-Government Agreement with the Government of Yukon and the Government of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Tlįkw Tākw Dčslģn Łingķt Council Dąt Nīk 2011/12
    Tlákw tâkw Dèslìn Łingít Council dàt nîk 2011/12 The Teslin Tlingit Council Annual Report 2011/12 yourvoiceyourgovernmentourfuture Teslin Tlingit Council Mission Statement The Teslin Tlingit Council is mandated to cooperatively continue to preserve and develop the social, economic, political and cultural well being of the Teslin Tlingit First Nation, to maintain our pride and independence based on trust and respect, and to conserve the wildlife habitat and traditional territory for the well being of our future generations Àxh shtughâ hà ditî yá hà gamáni Tlagû yexh áwé hà łatin yá hà tl’átgi káx’ Yèsu áwé yìysitîn hà yêjinêyi kha mâ sá yè tuwa.û kha mâ sá tułatin wé hà tl’átgi kha hà sha gûn yourvoiceyourgovernmentourfuture TTC Annual Report 2011/12 The Chief 02 eXeCuTIVE DIReCToR 05 heRitage 07 implementation 13 Lands & Resources 18 woRkforce development 24 CApital & infrastructuRe 27 heAlTh & soCiAl 29 finAnCe 31 1 yourvoiceyourgovernmentourfuture transparency and accountability achieved through the All Citizen’s Executive Meetings, frequent public consultations and focused meetings driven by specific Citizen defined needs. These forums have delivered healthy public debate, improved transparency, and often resulted in direct Citizen led change. It is imperative for the government to uphold these opportunities, Message CHIeF from the continuing to engage both - with Peter Johnston Teslin and Whitehorse Citizens alike. There have been occasions when Citizen The follow pages include annual reports from each attendance has been low, but those that do come of TTC’s Department’s on their activities over the are able to influence decisions that will impact their last fiscal year from April 1st, 2011 to March 31st, lives and we encourage continued and growing 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Climate Exchange, 2013. Burwash Landing and Destruction Bay Landscape Hazards: Geological Mapping for Climate Change Adaptation Planning
    Community Adaptation Project BURWASH LANDING AND DESTRUCTION BAY LANDSCAPE HAZARDS: GEOLOGICAL MAPPING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLANNING April 2013 COMMUNITY ADAPTATION PROJECT BURWASH LANDING AND DESTRUCTION BAY LANDSCAPE HAZARDS: GEOLOGICAL MAPPING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLANNING April 2013 Printed in Whitehorse, Yukon, 2013 by Integraphics Ltd, 411D Strickland St. This publication may be obtained from: Northern Climate ExChange c/o Yukon Research Centre, Yukon College 500 College Drive PO Box 2799 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 5K4 Supporting research documents that were not published with this report may also be obtained from the above address. Recommended citation: Northern Climate ExChange, 2013. Burwash Landing and Destruction Bay Landscape Hazards: Geological Mapping for Climate Change Adaptation Planning. Yukon Research Centre, Yukon College, 111 p. and 2 maps. Production by Leyla Weston, Whitehorse, Yukon. Front cover photograph: Burwash Landing, with Kluane Lake in the foreground and the Kluane Range in the background; view is looking southeast from Dalan campground. Photo courtesy of Northern Climate ExChange Foreword The Kluane First Nation is made up of strong and inspired people, who have lived in their Traditional Territory since time immemorial. Their Territory spans an area between the White River to the north, and the Slims River to the south; and from the St. Elias Mountains to the west, to the Ruby Ranges to the east. We have seen many changes on the land and in our community - from the establishment of the Alaska Highway, to the inception of the Kluane First Nation Government; all the while, we remain present with the land. Today, we are witnessing changes in our climate that are reflected on the land, and so we must take action to address the needs of our future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Self-Governing First Nations and Indian Act Bands
    QS-Y347-004-BB-A1 Differences between Self-Governing First Nations and Indian Act Bands. Many of Canada’s First Nation communities are still governed by the Indian Act, and are referred to as Bands. This means that their reserve lands, monies, other resources and governance structure are managed by the provisions in the Indian Act. In the Yukon however, the majority of First Nations are self-governing. Self-Governing Yukon First Nations direct their own affairs, and for the most part, the Indian Act no longer applies to them, their Citizens, or to settlement land. The following is a brief comparison of the differences between Indian Act Bands and Self-Governing Yukon First Nations. Indian Act Bands: Only three Yukon First Nations remain under the Indian Act. The Indian Act applies to members of a Band, who have “status.” Land that is provided for use and benefit of the Band cannot be owned by the Band or individual members. Core funding for the Band is determined by the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. The Band government is accountable to the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Self‑Governing Yukon First Nations There are eleven Self-Governing Yukon First Nations. The Indian Act no longer applies to the First Nation or its Citizens (although individual citizens may still be entitled to “status” under the Act). The First Nation’s land is owned and managed by the First Nation government. The First Nation sets its own priorities and its election process is defined by its Constitution. The First Nation has the ability to tax its Citizens and other residents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yukon First Nations Oral History Project
    The Elders' Documentation Project: A Yukon First Nations Oral History Project MARILYN JENSEN After graduating from the University of Alaska-Anchorage with a de­ gree in anthropology, I had the good fortune to find a job directly related to my field of interest, ethnography, and in my own commu­ nity, Whitehorse, Yukon. Just one day after I finished my classes in December, 1992, I was offered a job as one of the researchers with the Elders' Documentation Project. This is how I began my training in applying anthropological theory to real life situations. This paper describes the Elders' Documentation Project and my personal experi­ ences of working in anthropology within my own cultural community. Storytelling and oral history are part of a Yukon First Nations tra­ dition, practised as far back as anyone can remember, from time imme­ morial to the present day. Oral tradition has always played a vital role in the lives of people who perform the stories and this is still the case today. Our stories are our past. They link us to our origins and they provide information about lifestyles from the past. They explain to us such phenomena as how the world was created. This is how our ances­ tors taught children about all aspects of life. Today, we are making every effort to preserve this history. Traditions of anthropology are changing in the Yukon, and the Elders' Documentation Project provides an example of how Aboriginal people are doing our own ethnography within established anthropo­ logical guidelines. One of the dominant themes in the information we gather is the extent to which change has occurred during the last hundred years and the kinds of changes our elders have observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill S-6, Yukon and Nunavut Regulatory Improvement Act Pétion : Projet De Loi S-6, Loi Sur L’Amélioration De La Réglementation Au Yukon Et Au Nunavut
    Petition: Bill S-6, Yukon and Nunavut Regulatory Improvement Act Pétion : Projet de loi S-6, Loi sur l’amélioration de la réglementation au Yukon et au Nunavut Last Name - Nom de famille First Name - Prénom City - Ville Aidole Suzanne Carcross Smith Howard Aspen Place Smarch Mary Jane Beaver Creek Ballegooyen Kati Burnash Landing Atlin Sheri Burwash Landing Dickson Robert Burwash Landing Dickson Alanna Burwash Landing Hicks Adam Burwash Landing McCready Colum Burwash Landing Moreno-Herrera Natalia Burwash Landing Pope Geraldine Burwash Landing Turner Jamie Calrgary Barette Christina Carcross Barr Jona Carcross Barr Kevin Carcross Beaffie Cynthia Carcross Beattie Shirley Carcross Ginc Bessie Carcross Huebschwerler Cindy Carcross Huebschwerler Margaret Carcross James Albert Carcross Linnemoller Kaitlyn Carcross Wally Anne Carcross Wetin Maryanne Carcross Billy Benson Carmacks Ajoub Natasha Dawson Anderson Allison Dawson Beaumont Jody Dawson Bibber Clara Van Dawson Bolt Glenda Dawson Burvey Marta Dawson Clarke Chris Dawson Dites Katnna Dawson Enderslev Erik V. Dawson Every Kylie Van Dawson Hallbom Alexander Dawson Joseph-Reav Angie Dawson Kormendy Shawna Dawson Morberg Julia Dawson Nagano Debbie Dawson Nagano Simon Dawson Taylor Tim Dawson Thom Adam Dawson Vigliotti Daniel J. Dawson MacLeod Chris Dawson City Djabii Yasmine Faro Petition: Bill S-6, Yukon and Nunavut Regulatory Improvement Act Pétion : Projet de loi S-6, Loi sur l’amélioration de la réglementation au Yukon et au Nunavut Hannah Doug Faro Alexie Dorothy Fort McPherson Brown Judy
    [Show full text]
  • Language List 2019
    First Nations Languages in British Columbia – Revised June 2019 Family1 Language Name2 Other Names3 Dialects4 #5 Communities Where Spoken6 Anishnaabemowin Saulteau 7 1 Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN 1. Anishinaabemowin Ojibway ~ Ojibwe Saulteau Plains Ojibway Blueberry River First Nations Fort Nelson First Nation 2. Nēhiyawēwin ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN Cree Nēhiyawēwin (Plains Cree) 1 West Moberly First Nations Plains Cree Many urban areas, especially Vancouver Cheslatta Carrier Nation Nak’albun-Dzinghubun/ Lheidli-T’enneh First Nation Stuart-Trembleur Lake Lhoosk’uz Dene Nation Lhtako Dene Nation (Tl’azt’en, Yekooche, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Nak’azdli) Nak’azdli Whut’en ATHABASKAN- ᑕᗸᒡ NaZko First Nation Saik’uz First Nation Carrier 12 EYAK-TLINGIT or 3. Dakelh Fraser-Nechakoh Stellat’en First Nation 8 Taculli ~ Takulie NA-DENE (Cheslatta, Sdelakoh, Nadleh, Takla Lake First Nation Saik’uZ, Lheidli) Tl’azt’en Nation Ts’il KaZ Koh First Nation Ulkatcho First Nation Blackwater (Lhk’acho, Yekooche First Nation Lhoosk’uz, Ndazko, Lhtakoh) Urban areas, especially Prince George and Quesnel 1 Please see the appendix for definitions of family, language and dialect. 2 The “Language Names” are those used on First Peoples' Language Map of British Columbia (http://fp-maps.ca) and were compiled in consultation with First Nations communities. 3 The “Other Names” are names by which the language is known, today or in the past. Some of these names may no longer be in use and may not be considered acceptable by communities but it is useful to include them in order to assist with the location of language resources which may have used these alternate names.
    [Show full text]