DOCSLIB.ORG

The “Scarborough Subway Solution”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The “Scarborough Subway Solution” The “Scarborough Subway Solution” April 2017 “There are intelligent, practical, and cost-effective ways to integrate multiple modes of public transit for moving people more efficiently in the Greater Toronto Area” “When public servants fail to effectively perform their duties to serve the public interest – the public must take action.” Paul Chomik, P.Eng. Copyright: Paul Chomik 2017 All rights reserved The “Scarborough Subway Solution” Part of a broader initiative to provide “Subways for Scarborough” Proposed Solution The current proposal for replacing the Scarborough “Rapid Transit” system is far too costly and operationally-ineffective compared with other options to be seriously considered. A cost-effective alternative solution is readily implementable at a considerable cost-savings to taxpayers – which will have a far superior result in terms of useful rapid transit infrastructure. Because all Toronto taxpayers are required to pay a special tax to fund the Scarborough Subway extension, it is expected that the most cost-effective subway option should be selected. Rationale The exploding cost of the current Scarborough Subway extension is due to the extensive underground tunnelling that is now required, as well as the re-configuration of the route at Scarborough Centre requiring the construction of a new station. Tunnelling a new route to Scarborough Centre precludes retaining the existing transit stops along the Scarborough RT route. A rational alternative to the excessively-expensive course of action that is being undertaken is to either re-use the current Kennedy Station, or build a new Kennedy Subway Station adjacent to the current location, in conjunction with a new underground alignment that rises and connects with the existing Scarborough RT right-of-way (necessary to by-pass the very sharp RT curves at the existing Kennedy station). These options would only require about 0.5 kilometres of underground tunnel, instead of the extensive 6.0 km of tunnel required for the single-stop option that is currently proceeding. The existing Scarborough RT right-of-way would be retained and the track re-gauged to subway wheel width the rest of the way to Scarborough Town Centre. Such a move would result in considerable construction cost savings – which could be diverted to other important transit projects. 1 Figure 1: Two most cost-effective alignments for the Scarborough Subway Extension. The “Scarborough Subway Solution” involves either reusing the existing Kennedy Subway Station, or building a new station along the alignment of the subway tracks just west of the current station, and tunneling a short section underground to link up with the existing Scarborough RT right-of-way. By re-using and upgrading the current RT infrastructure and adapting it to subway standards, cost savings of over $3-billion should be realized. That valuable public-transit infrastructure funding could be more effectively utilized elsewhere, such as extending the subway system further into Scarborough by extending the Sheppard Subway line to Scarborough Centre. The project would require re-using the existing subway infrastructure with or without the construction of a new subway station, plus a new underground track section connecting the existing subway tracks up to the old RT line, and re-gauging the RT tracks to the same track gauge as the subway system. The majority of construction can be undertaken while the existing Subway/RT system continues to operate normally. The final connection and alteration to the Scarborough RT right-of-way can be staged over the summertime to reduce disruption to commuters as more people are away from work during that period. 2 Such a project would eliminate a totally-needless physical transfer from the subway system to the RT system right-of-way, due to the complete incompatibility of the two existing transit systems. Additional cost savings can also be possible by constructing subway stations to a basic standardized design – instead of expending exorbitant sums of taxpayers’ money on totally- unnecessary architectural extravagance which does nothing to contribute to faster and more- effective transit service. As much of the preparatory construction can be undertaken while the existing Scarborough RT continues to operate, service disruptions to transit riders can be minimized. By staging the final track connection and re-gauging to the summer months, again, service disruptions can be minimized. Because the time required to make the final connections will be minimal compared to the other construction requirements, existing bus transit routes could be supplemented in the vicinity of the RT corridor to provide fast connections to the existing Kennedy Subway Station. Interference from “SmartTrack” It is well-established that the reasoning for not re-using the existing Scarborough RT right-of- way is due to interference from the “SmartTrack” proposal since it duplicates much of the Scarborough RT route, and is to be located directly adjacent to the existing Scarborough RT right-of-way. Figure 2: John Tory’s Smart Track. 3 The resulting failure to maintain and capitalize on existing TTC transfer points and established ridership patterns will disrupt the established flow of transit riders and will unnecessarily inconvenience riders feeding into those existing stations. Five (5) existing RT stations will be replaced with only 2 SmartTrack stations that do not include the Scarborough Centre station. By recognizing that GO Transit rail service and the Regional Express Rail (RER) proposal along rail corridors within Toronto, and the SmartTrack proposal essentially all duplicate each other, eliminating that unnecessary duplication and complications caused by SmartTrack and operating the proposed RER system at a higher frequency of service tailored to demand throughout the day should be much more cost-effective for taxpayers – particularly due to the elimination of SmartTrack’s bureaucracy which simply costs taxpayers even more on an ongoing basis. “• The SmartTrack line will be 53km in length. It is mainly a retrofit of two existing GO lines operated by Metrolinx. Approximately 90% of its length will be on existing GO trackage.” ref: (pg. 3) THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN - The SmartTrack Line (JOHNTORY.CA) Figure 3: GO Transit routes illustrating “SmartTrack” duplication with concurrent competing transit services. 4 On the east side of Toronto, GO Transit rail service, RER and SmartTrack are planned to operate concurrently along the eastern rail corridor. On the west side, GO Transit rail service, RER, SmartTrack and the Union-Pearson Express service are essentially duplicate transit services along the western rail corridor. Most importantly, all of these competing transit services will simultaneously funnel transit riders to Union Station, potentially elevating transit rider density to levels similar to the Bloor-Yonge subway station – or even worse. Figure 4: Public Transit routes showing “SmartTrack” duplication and displaced Scarborough Subway Extension In addition, SmartTrack essentially parallels Toronto’s future “Downtown Relief Line” on the future western approach from the Bloor-Danforth Subway line. It also parallels part the eastern portion of the Relief Line up to Gerrard Street-Pape Avenue. SmartTrack represents a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money on top of everything else due to excessive multiple over-duplication of competing public transit services. The unnecessary duplication of bureaucracies, systems and personnel represents a complete failure to maximize the effective return for expenditures of taxpayers’ money on public transit. The most important question to ask is: why are public servants incapable of figuring this out? And do they simply consider taxpayers to be a bottomless pit of money to spend on inadequately-planned transit proposals? 5 Figure 5: Downtown Relief Line (east) showing parallel route of SmartTrack from Gerrard-Pape (which will funnel even more transit riders to Union Station) Figure 6: Downtown Relief Line (west) showing parallel route along the Canadian Pacific Railway corridor where SmartTrack, GO Transit, RER and Union-Pearson Express are to operate concurrently. 6 As well, SmartTrack is expected to result in a time savings of about 10-minutes between Kennedy Subway Station and Union Station according to Toronto Mayor John Tory. Little justification can be made for such a poorly-performing transit initiative when the Downtown Relief Line is the real public transit priority. The minimal SmartTrack time savings compared to the existing subway system is highly unlikely to be justified by the unnecessary costs incurred for transit duplication by SmartTrack since the Downtown Relief Line will similarly reduce transit trip times to Union Station. “• The SmartTrack line will slash commute times for suburban passengers. Estimates indicate that riders can expect a less than 30-minute commute from Kennedy subway to Union Station. Today, that same commute takes approximately 40 minutes on the current subway network.” ref: (pg. 2) THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN - The SmartTrack Line (JOHNTORY.CA) There are a total of 19 subway stops from Kennedy Station to Union Station (13 stops on the Bloor-Danforth line - and 6 stops from the Yonge Station to Union Station). SmartTrack will include only 5 stops between Kennedy Station and Union Station. One would expect a significantly shorter trip time using SmartTrack instead of a marginal improvement of about only 10 minutes (which cannot seriously be considered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collective Agreement Bombardier Transportation
    Collective Agreement between Bombardier Transportation – North America (Service, repair and maintenance, calling of crews and the operation of trains relating to the Metrolinx GO Transit and UP Express Operations and Maintenance within Ontario.) and Teamsters Canada Rail Conference Division 660 TABLE OF CONTENTS MAINTENANCE SECTION Page____________________ 3 RAIL SECTION Page____________________55 2 INDEX MAINTENANCE SECTION 1.0 PREAMBLE 4 2.0 RECOGNITION 4 3.0 RESERVATION OF MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 4 4.0 MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNION 5 5.0 CHECK OFF OF UNION DEDUCTIONS 5 6.0 UNION ACTIVITIES 6 7.0 NO STRIKE / LOCKOUT 7 8.0 GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 7 9.0 INVESTIGATONS AND DISCIPLINE 10 10.0 PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE 12 11.0 SENIORITY 12 12.0 TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT 13 13.0 POSTING AND FILLING OF VACANCIES 14 14.0 TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENTS IN THE BARGAINING UNIT 16 15.0 LAYOFF AND RECALL 17 16.0 HOURS OF WORK 17 17.0 BREAKS AND MEAL PERIODS 18 18.0 CALL BACK 18 19.0 OVERTIME 18 20.0 SHIFT PREMIUM 20 21.0 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 21 22.0 LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 21 23.0 JURY DUTY AND ATTENDING COURT 21 24.0 RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS 22 25.0 VACATION 24 26.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY 25 27.0 BARGAINING UNIT WORK 28 28.0 LEAVE OF ABSENCE 29 29.0 BENEFITS 29 30.0 PAYDAY 32 31.0 CLASSIFICATIONS AND WAGE RATES 32 JOB DESCRIPTIONS 34 DEFINITIONS 40 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 40 32.0 WORKPLACE DIGNITY AND RESPECT 42 33.0 DUTY TO ACCOMMODATE 43 34.0 COPY OF THE AGREEMENT 44 35.0 ZONE AGREEMENT 44 36.0 TERM 46 LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING 1 47 LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING 2 48 APPENDIX 1
    [Show full text]
  • PATH Underground Walkway
    PATH Marker Signs ranging from Index T V free-standing outdoor A I The Fairmont Royal York Hotel VIA Rail Canada H-19 pylons to door decals Adelaide Place G-12 InterContinental Toronto Centre H-18 Victory Building (80 Richmond 1 Adelaide East N-12 Hotel D-19 The Hudson’s Bay Company L-10 St. West) I-10 identify entrances 11 Adelaide West L-12 The Lanes I-11 W to the walkway. 105 Adelaide West I-13 K The Ritz-Carlton Hotel C-16 WaterPark Place J-22 130 Adelaide West H-12 1 King West M-15 Thomson Building J-10 95 Wellington West H-16 Air Canada Centre J-20 4 King West M-14 Toronto Coach Terminal J-5 100 Wellington West (Canadian In many elevators there is Allen Lambert Galleria 11 King West M-15 Toronto-Dominion Bank Pavilion Pacific Tower) H-16 a small PATH logo (Brookfield Place) L-17 130 King West H-14 J-14 200 Wellington West C-16 Atrium on Bay L-5 145 King West F-14 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower mounted beside the Aura M-2 200 King West E-14 I-16 Y button for the floor 225 King West C-14 Toronto-Dominion Centre J-15 Yonge-Dundas Square N-6 B King Subway Station N-14 TD Canada Trust Tower K-18 Yonge Richmond Centre N-10 leading to the walkway. Bank of Nova Scotia K-13 TD North Tower I-14 100 Yonge M-13 Bay Adelaide Centre K-12 L TD South Tower I-16 104 Yonge M-13 Bay East Teamway K-19 25 Lower Simcoe E-20 TD West Tower (100 Wellington 110 Yonge M-12 Next Destination 10-20 Bay J-22 West) H-16 444 Yonge M-2 PATH directional signs tell 220 Bay J-16 M 25 York H-19 390 Bay (Munich Re Centre) Maple Leaf Square H-20 U 150 York G-12 you which building you’re You are in: J-10 MetroCentre B-14 Union Station J-18 York Centre (16 York St.) G-20 in and the next building Hudson’s Bay Company 777 Bay K-1 Metro Hall B-15 Union Subway Station J-18 York East Teamway H-19 Bay Wellington Tower K-16 Metro Toronto Convention Centre you’ll be entering.
    [Show full text]
  • UP Express Pricing Strategy Staff Report
    To: Metrolinx Board of Directors From: Kathy Haley, President, Union Pearson Express Date: December 11, 2014 Re: UP Express Pricing Strategy Staff Report 1. Executive Summary With the launch of Union Pearson (UP) Express in spring 2015, Toronto will join the ranks of other world class cities with an express rail service between downtown and the airport. UP Express will provide travellers with a fast, simple route that takes 25 minutes, and departs every 15 minutes for 19.5 hours a day. To inform the fare structure, research and analysis was completed on market trends and passenger demographics, as well as benchmarking against local and international transportation modes. UP Express has developed a fare structure based on the principles of Distance (fare by distance), Discounts (to build ridership), and Demand (ensuring enough ridership). The proposed UP Express one-way adult fare from Union Station and Toronto Pearson is $19 with the PRESTO card or $27.50 fare without the PRESTO card. Staff are proposing discounted prices for families, children, students, seniors, and airport employees who have a valid Toronto Pearson identification card. The proposed fare structure builds in the elimination of the $1.85 access fee originally required by the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA). 2. Recommendation Be it Resolved that: The Board of Directors approve the recommended fare structures as presented by UP Express on December 11, 2014. 3. Project Background Toronto’s dedicated Air Rail Link (ARL), the Union Pearson (UP) Express, is launching in spring 2015 and will be owned and operated by Metrolinx. The project is currently on-time and on-budget, and when launched it will run between Canada’s two busiest passenger transport hubs – Union Station in downtown Toronto and the Toronto Pearson International Airport (Toronto Pearson).
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Report GC2.Doc APPENDIX 1
    Clerk’s Files Corporate Originator’s CD.15.SRR Files Report DATE: June 1, 2015 TO: Chair and Members of General Committee Meeting Date: June 17, 2015 FROM: Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Funding Request for SRRA Research on the Impact of RER and SmartTrack on Office Development in Mississauga RECOMMENDATION: That a funding request by Strategic Regional Research Alliance (SRRA) of $50,000 to support research, as described in the report titled “Funding Request for SRRA Research on the Impact of RER and SmartTrack on Office Development in Mississauga” from the Commissioner of Planning & Building, dated June 1, 2015, be approved. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The province has made a commitment to deliver Regional Express Rail (RER) which will expand GO Transit rail service to include 15- minute two-way, all-day GO Transit rail service. • The RER initiative for the Lakeshore, Milton and Kitchener GO Transit rail corridors is one of the City’s priority transit projects. • The proposed SmartTrack plan builds on the RER initiative, with 53-kilometre, all-day, two-way frequent train service including a new heavy rail spur line along Eglinton Avenue West to Mississauga’s Airport Corporate Centre. CD.15.SRR General Committee - 2 - June 1, 2015 • Strategic Regional Research Alliance (SRRA) is undertaking research to provide forecasts of office development and employment growth likely to result from RER and SmartTrack. These forecasts will provide input for ridership modeling of SmartTrack/RER. • This research is valuable given the importance of Office development for the success of the City’s future employment growth.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKAGE September 15, 2017 Table Of
    COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKAGE September 15, 2017 Table of Contents Item From Subject Page 1 Denise Beard, Manager of Patrick J McNally Foundation 1 Community Development Donation Rob Axiak, Manager of File: 155-03-12 Recreation Services 2 Vito Tolone, Director of Ontario Municipal Commuter Cycling 2-3 Transportation Services Program File: 155-03-20 3 Andrea Smith, Manager of City Wide Population and Built-Up 4-10 Policy & Research, Planning Area Residential Unit Growth Analysis and Building Department (September, 2017) File: 155-03-10 4 Metrolinx Metrolinx Board Meeting – September 11-13 2017 File: 770-10-1 5 Forests Ontario Ontario’s Green Leaf Challenge 14-16 File: 145-01 6 Halton Hills Council Resolution regarding violence 17 in Charlottesville, Virginia 160-01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Metrolinx Board Meeting - September 2017 The Metrolinx Board of Directors met today to receive a number of reports, including updates on PRESTO, Metrolinx’s capital projects, the next Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and fare integration. Board Chair Rob Prichard addressed his correspondence with Minister Del Duca on the proposed Kirby Road and Lawrence East GO stations, which confirms that Metrolinx will not enter into any obligations or agreements unless and until management and the Board are satisfied these stations are justified, and that the Minister will respect and support whatever conclusion the Board reaches. The Next RTP: Draft Plan for Public Consultation Chief Planning Officer Leslie Woo presented the staff recommended version of the Draft 2041 RTP. With the new Draft RTP Metrolinx is aiming to go beyond what was in The Big Move to put traveller needs at the core of planning and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx
    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission
    Toronto Transit Commission Relief Line South Toronto Transit Commission The engineering support services provided by GZ included Location: Toronto, Canada preliminary design of the temporary and permanent support measures for the SEM caverns in the swelling conditions as well Date: 2017 - 2019 design of the waterproofing system. In addition, GZ provided constructability reviews and value engineering studies for the stations, as well as for the alignment. Structure: 2 large diameter underground Station caverns Length: 4.66 mi (7.5 km) Geology: Georgian Bay Shale, glacial tills Cost: - Client: HDR Owner: Toronto Transit Commission Preliminary SEM Station Design: n 2017, the Toronto Transit Commission approved the I Preliminary Engineering Design of the Relief Line South Project, which was a planned new 7.5 km long subway line that was intended to run through the center of downtown Toronto. The project was to connect the Yonge-University-Spadina Subway (Line 1) to the Bloor-Danforth Subway (Line 2) in the downtown area. The goal of the Relief Line South was to help relieve Figure 1. Proposed Relief Line South arrangement with stations. crowding on Line 1 south of Bloor, at the Bloor-Yonge Station, and on the surface transit routes coming in and out of downtown. Construction planning of the Relief Line South included construction of twin running tunnels by means of tunnel boring machines, five new stations, and modifications to three existing stations, which will be converted to interchange stations. Design of the Relief Line South progressed to the preliminary engineering stage, and was consequently re-envisioned as the southern section of the Ontario Line Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Line and Yonge Subway Extension
    Relief Line and Yonge Subway Extension Leslie Woo Chief Planning Officer JUNE-26-17 RELIEF LINE AND YONGE SUBWAY EXTENSION OVERVIEWS • Both the Relief Line and the Yonge Subway Extension are priority projects included in The Big Move and will be included in the next Regional Transportation Plan • Each project makes a significant contribution to the regional transit network by: • Enhancing our ability to connect people to where they need to be • Adding capacity so that transit trips are more comfortable • Enabling more residents to choose transit for their trips • Spurring on local transit oriented development 2 A REGIONAL SYSTEM • The Relief Line and the Yonge Subway Extension are part of the regional transportation network needed to meet the GTHA’s growth to 2031 and beyond • The 7.4 km northern extension of the Yonge Subway (Line 1) from Finch Avenue into Richmond Hill will connect two provincial urban growth centres, North York Centre and Richmond Hill Centre, and significantly reduce the 2,500 daily bus trips along the busy Yonge corridor • The Relief Line is a critical infrastructure investment required to create capacity for new riders on the Yonge subway and provide a new connection into Toronto’s downtown • The Yonge Subway Extension would generate more access • The Relief Line would create more capacity • Both projects need to advance in an integrated way 3 PARTNERSHIPS Much progress is being made in bringing the parties together to work as a team to advance both projects Yonge Subway Extension • Metrolinx, City of Toronto, Toronto
    [Show full text]
  • The One Toronto Transit Plan the One Toronto Transit Plan
    THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN As Mayor, John Tory will make Toronto more liveable, affordable and functional. Public transit is at the heart of what it takes to improve Toronto in each of these areas. John Tory’s One Toronto Transit Plan is a collection of initiatives and public transit investments that will get our city moving in seven years, and provide relief to the Yonge-University-Spadina subway line. THE ONE TORONTO PLAN WILL: • Start construction of the Scarborough subway extension immediately. • Engage the City with the Government of Ontario’s and Metrolinx’s plans for Regional Express Rail (RER) – all-day, two-way surface subway service on existing GO track lines with new higher-speed vehicles . • Start with the SmartTrack line as the first RER project, providing 53 km of relief. The SmartTrack line will run from the Airport Corporate Centre in the west, down to Union Station and back up to Markham in the east, with 22 new station stops and four interchanges with the TTC rapid transit network. • Finance the City’s one third of the capital cost of the SmartTrack line without raising property taxes, using tax increment financing. • Provide new express bus services for a segment of travelers that can be moved much quicker if fewer stops are made en route. Examples, which have been discussed, include, Don Mills Road, Dufferin Street and Front Street/Liberty Village. THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH TORY’S ONE TORONTO TRANSIT RELIEF PLAN INCLUDE: • Bringing relief sooner, to more Torontonians, rather than just the downtown- concentrated proposals of other candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Smarttrack Ridership Analysis: Project Final Report
    SMARTTRACK Research Report RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS Project Final Report Eric J. Miller, James Vaughan, Monika Nasterska June 2016 SMARTTRACK RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS PROJECT FINAL REPORT Prepared for the City Manager, City of Toronto by: Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Director, Transportation Research Institute Research Director, Travel Modelling Group University of Toronto James Vaughan & Monika Nasterska Travel Modelling Group, University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute June, 2016 i Executive Summary Project Objectives On December 11, 2014, City Council directed the City Manager in consultation with the Province/Metrolinx to develop a work plan to undertake an accelerated review of the SmartTrack and RER plans. Council also directed the City Manager to retain the specialized services of the University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (UTTRI) to support the planning analysis and required transit ridership modelling as a component of the overall review.1 On February 10, 2015, City Council considered the report EX2.2 SmartTrack Work Plan (2015- 2016), and approved the accelerated work plan for the review of SmartTrack.2 The UTTRI component of this work was to provide transit ridership estimates and other key network performance measures using the City’s new Regional Travel Demand Model (GTAModel Version 4.0) developed at the University of Toronto by UTTRI. As detailed in the final Terms of Reference for the UTTRI work, this work included: • Confirming the integrated RER and SmartTrack Service Concept to be modelled. • Completion and validation of a new travel demand model system to be used by the City of Toronto in this and similar studies of transit ridership and travel demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study
    Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report Metrolinx R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 6990 Creditview Road, Unit 2 Mississauga ON L5N 8R9 CANADA August 2015 300034767.0000 Metrolinx i Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report August 2015 Distribution List No. of Hard PDF Email Organization Name Copies 0 Yes Yes Metrolinx Record of Revisions Revision Date Description 0 July 2015 Draft Submission to Metrolinx 1 August 2015 Final Submission to Metrolinx R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Report Prepared By: Ashley Gallaugher Environmental Scientist AG:mp Report Reviewed By: Jennifer Vandermeer, P.Eng. Environmental Assessment Lead Jim Georgas, C.E.T. Transit Manager R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 300034767.0000 034767_Caledonia GO Station TPAP EA Public Meeting 1 Summary Report.docx Metrolinx ii Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report August 2015 Executive Summary PROJECT Caledonia GO Station, Transit Project Assessment Process Environmental Assessment (EA) Study PROPONENT Metrolinx ACTIVITY Public Meeting #1, Open House Format DATE, TIME & May 26, 2015 LOCATION 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. York Memorial Collegiate 2690 Eglinton Avenue West, Toronto, ON, M6M 1T9 PROJECT TEAM Elise Croll, Metrolinx MEMBERS Trevor Anderson, Metrolinx PRESENT Carolina Daza Ortiz, Metrolinx Tania Gautam, Metrolinx Georgina Collymore, Metrolinx Vanessa Anders, Metrolinx Doug Keenie R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited (Burnside) Jim Georgas, Burnside Jennifer Vandermeer, Burnside Debanjan Mookerjea, Burnside • To describe the existing study corridor and opportunities. PURPOSE • To introduce Metrolinx’ transportation goals. • To describe the proposed study and purpose. • To present the proposed infrastructure for the new Caledonia GO Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Subway System, ON
    Canadian Geotechnical Society Canadian Geotechnical Achievements 2017 Toronto Subway System Geotechnical Investigation and Design of Tunnels Geographical location Key References Wong, JW. 1981. Geotechnical/ Toronto, Ontario geological aspects of the Toronto subway system. Toronto Transit Commission. When it began or was completed Walters, DL, Main, A, Palmer, S, Construction began in 1949 and continues today. Westland, J, and Bihendi, H. 2011. Managing subsurface risk for Toronto- York Spadina Subway extension project. Why a Canadian geotechnical achievement? 2011 Pan-Am and CGS Geotechnical Conference. Construction of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) subway system, the first in Canada, began in 1949 and currently consists Photograph and Map of four subway lines. In total there are currently approximately 68 km of subway tracks and 69 stations. Over one million trips are taken daily on the TTC during weekdays. The subway system has been expanded in several stages, from 1954, when the first line (the Yonge Line) was opened, to 2002, when the most recently completed line (the Sheppard Line) was opened. Currently the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension is under construction. The subway tunnels have been constructed using a number of different technologies over the years including: open cut excavation, open/closed shield tunneling under ambient air pressure and compressed air, hand mining and earth pressurized tunnel boring machines. The subway tunnels range in design from reinforced concrete box structures to approximately 6 m diameter precast concrete segmental liners or cast iron segmental liners. Looking east inside newly constructed TTC subway The tunnels have been advanced through various geological tunnel, 1968. (City of Toronto Archives) formations: from hard glacial tills to saturated alluvial sands and silts, and from glaciolacustrine clays to shale bedrock.
    [Show full text]