Future Congestion Patterns & Network Augmentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Future Congestion Patterns & Network Augmentation FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS & NETWORK AUGMENTATION Report on Assignment A: Transmission Development Framework Scenarios 25 June 2009 Final Report FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS AND NETWORK AUGMENTATION Reliance and Limitations The professional analysis and advice in this report has been prepared by Intelligent Energy Systems Pty Ltd (IES) for the Australian Energy Markets Commission (AEMC). This report is supplied in good faith and reflects the knowledge, expertise and experience of the consultants involved. In conducting the analysis for this report IES has endeavoured to use what it considers is the best information available at the date of publication. IES makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the assumptions or estimates on which the forecasts and calculations are based. Although IES exercises reasonable care when making forecasts or predictions, factors in the process, such as future market behaviour, are inherently uncertain and cannot be reliably forecast or predicted. All projections, forecasts and calculations in this report are for illustrative purposes only, using assumptions and estimates described herein. IES makes no representation or warranty that any calculation, projection, assumption or estimate contained in this report should or will be achieved or is or will prove to be accurate. The reliance that a recipient places upon the calculations and projections in this report is a matter for a recipient’s own commercial judgement and IES accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of reliance on the report. In addition, IES shall not be liable in respect of any claim arising out of the failure of a recipient’s investment to perform to the advantage of the recipient or to the advantage of the recipient to the degree suggested or assumed in any advice or forecast given by IES. ii FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS AND NETWORK AUGMENTATION Executive Summary Background This report presents the methodology, results and assumptions of the modelling undertaken by Intelligent Energy Systems (IES) in Assignment A of the Future Congestion Patterns & Network Augmentation Scenario Studies. The aim of modelling studies was to provide insight into whether the existing frameworks, with the introduction of the CPRS and expanded RET, will provide network and generation businesses appropriate operational and investment incentives and locational signals in the new environment within which congestion may be more material Assignment A specified that the following scenarios be modelled based on normal commercial entry and exit decisions and behaviour of generators: • Transmission is developed to only meet mandatory obligation and the RET target (based on normal commercial entry and exit decisions and behaviour of generators); • Transmission is developed according to the current framework (based on normal commercial entry and exit decisions and behaviour of generators); • Transmission and generation development are co-optimised. It was agreed with the AEMC that that all cases should be based on a central planning approach that optimises generator entry and exit within the framework of the scenario to allow for a common basis for comparison of the first two cases with the co-optimised case. The assumptions that IES and ROAM Consulting (ROAM) were to use were agreed with the AEMC at a meeting on 30 th March 2009. Since ROAM and IES had both been commissioned to undertake Assignment A, it was agreed that IES and ROAM would utilise common assumptions where possible. This included the interconnector upgrade options and costs. There was no discussion on the options and costs to address intra-regional transmission line congestion. Assumptions All the assumptions were obtained from public documents where available. The key assumptions were obtained from: the 2008 NEMMCO SOO and 2009 NTS Consultation Issue Paper, the 2009 ACIL TASMAN report to NEMMCO on “Fuel Resource, New Entry and Generation Costs in the NEM”, and the Australian Treasury paper “Australia’s Low Pollution Future: The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation”, October 2008. Scenario Development After consideration of the issues involved, IES translated the AEMC’s scenarios into the following modelling: iii FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS AND NETWORK AUGMENTATION • Scenario 1: Non-responsive transmission – generation entry and exit is optimised based on a forward curve for carbon permit prices and the requirements for the RET using the existing transmission system with committed expansions. Generator entry is based on existing transmission capacity. Transmission is only developed to ensure demand is supplied and the RET satisfied. • Scenario 2: Current regime working effectively – generation entry and exit are optimised based on a forward curve for carbon permit prices and the requirement for the RET. Generators enter on the assumption that any intra- regional transmission constraints will be addressed under the regulatory test where mandatory obligations, as they pertain to the reliability limb of the test, incorporate current TNSP planning criteria. Interconnection is developed as would likely be done under the Regulatory Test. • Scenario 3: Co-optimising central planner – generation entry and exit and transmission expansion is co-optimised with transmission upgrade options based on a forward curve for carbon permit prices and the requirements for the RET. Limitations of the Modelling Before commencing the modelling a number of limitations were identified. The main ones were as follows: • All the modelling assumed that the transmission system was only in the system normal state. This meant that the degree of congestion and the value of transmission upgrades were underestimated as the most severe cases of market congestion occur when one or more key components of the transmission system are unavailable; • The modelling did not assume any change to the current regional reserve criteria associated with interconnector options modelled. This meant that there may have been some economic value to some interconnector upgrades not included in the modelling undertaken; • While the modelling was based on realistic generator bidding behaviour it did not include potential gaming strategies that could be employed in the presence of an increased number of intra-regional constraints; • There was very limited data on potential network upgrade options. This meant that a proper co-optimisation of intra-regional network upgrades and generation was not possible; • Because the modelling only used 50% probability of exceedence peak demands and it is during very high demand periods (sometimes considerably higher the 50% probability of exceedence peak demands) that network capacity is fully utilised, the modelling may have understated the required amount and value of transmission upgrades. iv FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS AND NETWORK AUGMENTATION The Modelling Approach IES used two models in this study. The first was the IES Integrated Energy Market Model (referred to as the MARKAL model as it is based on the MARKAL modelling framework) and the second was the IES simulation model PROPHET. MARKAL was used to obtain the optimised level of interconnection development and the optimised entry of generators as assumed in the scenarios. The IES PROPHET model was used to model the NEM in detail and the constraints that occur on the transmission system under the assumptions used. Results of the Modelling The key results of the modelling were • The level of congestion observed; • The interconnection and intraregional transmission lines developed; • The differences in the level and location of renewable generation and non- renewable generation; • The difference in dispatch costs. Line Constraints To analyse the level of congestion in the network, both the hours that lines were constrained and the amounts by which they were constrained were considered. This was done by relaxing all the intra-regional transmission line limits in the simulation model and determining the MWh of flows that exceeded each line’s rating. We have called this “uncarried” energy. Uncarried energy can be thought of as the energy that would have been transmitted had the line been able to support flows greater than allowed by its rating. In the report uncarried energy is presented for individual lines and also as a total over all lines. Figure 1-1 below shows the amount of uncarried energy per year for each scenario before line upgrades were carried out according to a criterion of limiting uncarried energy to 10,000 MWh per year. As expected, Scenario 2 (unconstrained generator development) leads to the highest amount of uncarried energy before line upgrades. In this scenario the level of uncarried GWh increases significantly over the period 2014 to 2017 after which it decreases slightly. This rapid change is probably due to the substantial increase in carbon emissions costs from 1 st July 2014 due to a change from a 5% target to a 15% target. Scenarios 1 and 3 show similar levels of uncarried energy indicating that optimising generator / transmission development involves utilising the existing network to near its fullest. The sensitivity of congestion expressed as uncarried energy to line rating was also analysed. This was done by increasing the rating of all lines by a multiplier. This is shown in Figure 1-2 for the year 2020, which shows uncarried energy versus the multiplier used to increase all line ratings. v FUTURE CONGESTION PATTERNS AND NETWORK AUGMENTATION
Recommended publications
  • South Australian Generation Forecasts
    South Australian Generation Forecasts April 2021 South Australian Advisory Functions Important notice PURPOSE The purpose of this publication is to provide information to the South Australian Minister for Energy and Mining about South Australia’s electricity generation forecasts. AEMO publishes this South Australian Generation Forecasts report in accordance with its additional advisory functions under section 50B of the National Electricity Law. This publication is generally based on information available to AEMO as at 31 December 2020, as modelled for the 2021 Gas Statement of Opportunities (published on 29 March 2021). DISCLAIMER AEMO has made reasonable efforts to ensure the quality of the information in this publication but cannot guarantee that information, forecasts and assumptions are accurate, complete or appropriate for your circumstances. This publication does not include all of the information that an investor, participant or potential participant in the National Electricity Market might require and does not amount to a recommendation of any investment. Anyone proposing to use the information in this publication (which includes information and forecasts from third parties) should independently verify its accuracy, completeness and suitability for purpose, and obtain independent and specific advice from appropriate experts. Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, AEMO and its officers, employees and consultants involved in the preparation of this publication: • make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this publication; and • are not liable (whether by reason of negligence or otherwise) for any statements, opinions, information or other matters contained in or derived from this publication, or any omissions from it, or in respect of a person’s use of the information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Transportation
    Wind Turbine Transportation Temporary delays – Gateway Motorway / Mt Gravatt-Capalaba Road intersection May 2019 – July 2019 Saturday to Thursday nights between 10pm and 12am Saturday to Thursday nights (six nights per week), between 10pm and 12am, the intersection of the Gateway Motorway and Mt Gravatt-Capalaba Road will be closed intermittently, for approximately 15-20 minutes, to allow for the safe movement of oversize vehicles transporting wind turbine blades and large tower sections to the Coopers Gap Wind Farm near Cooranga North. Traffic will be held at the Gateway Motorway / Mt Gravatt-Capalaba Road intersection and on the motorway off-ramp until it is safe to continue. We will try to minimise the disruption to other road users where possible, but some delays are to be expected. These temporary closures will be in place between May and July 2019. Closure times Gateway Motorway / Mt Gravatt-Capalaba Road intersection • Saturday to Thursday nights (six nights per week), intermittent closures between 10pm – 12am, from May to July 2019 Transportation of oversize wind turbine components Between January and November 2019, components for the wind farm’s 123 GE wind turbines will be transported over 300km from the Port of Brisbane to the Coopers Gap Wind Farm site. In total there will be approximately 1200 oversize transport movements to deliver all of the wind turbine components to site – including blades, tower sections, hubs and nacelles. The blades, which are up to 67.2 metres long, are the largest wind turbine blades ever transported in Australia. The movement of such large pieces of equipment requires detailed planning and coordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Updates Further Details Are Available in the Application Week Ending 28 April 2017 for Electricity Generation Authority: AGL Hydro
    approximately 50km south-west of Kingaroy and 65km north of Dalby. The Regulator is seeking feedback from interested persons with regards to issuing AGL Hydro Partnership (the operator of the proposed generator) a generation authority for the Coopers Gap Wind Farm. Project Updates Further details are available in the Application Week ending 28 April 2017 for electricity generation authority: AGL Hydro Partnership for the Coopers Gap Wind Farm information paper. Off-Site Renewable Energy EOI 26 April Have your say Monash University (Monash) is inviting Written submissions about the proposed Expressions of Interest (EOI) from suitably Coopers Gap Wind Farm are welcome. Please qualified, experienced and resourced send your submissions to: providers for the long-term contract supply of 45 to 55 GWh of electricity from a renewable Email: energy source. The contract will also include [email protected] the provision of renewable energy certificates, namely Large-scale Generation Mail: Attn: Andrea Wold Certificates (LGC's). Regulation, Governance and Analytics Department of Energy and Water Supply More information available from PO Box 15456 https://www.tenderlink.com/monashuni/ CITY EAST QLD 4002 Source: Monash University Submissions close at 5pm on Monday, 1 May 2017. Source: Queensland Government Coopers Gap Wind Farm Click on project to go to online datasheet: Coopers Gap Wind Farm Under the Electricity Act 1994, the Regulator (i.e. the Director-General of the Department of Energy and Water Supply) issues authorities (licences) for generation, transmission and distribution activities in Queensland’s electricity industry. Storage to strengthen Victoria’s energy system When an applicant applies for a generation 27 April authority to connect generating plant with The Andrews Labor Government is calling for capacity greater than 30 megawatts (MW) to detailed proposals for large scale battery a transmission grid or supply network, the energy storage facilities in western Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Gippsland Roadmap
    9 Dec 2019 The Energy Innovation Foreword Co-operative1, which has 10 years of experience On behalf of the Victorian Government, I am pleased to present the Victorian Regional Renewable Energy Roadmaps. delivering community-based As we transition to cleaner energy with new opportunities for jobs and greater security of supply, we are looking to empower communities, accelerate renewable energy and build a more sustainable and prosperous energy efficiency and state. renewable energy initiatives in Victoria is leading the way to meet the challenges of climate change by enshrining our Victorian Renewable Energy Targets (VRET) into law: 25 per the Southern Gippsland region, cent by 2020, rising to 40 per cent by 2025 and 50 per cent by 2030. Achieving the 2030 target is expected to boost the Victorian economy by $5.8 billion - driving metro, regional and rural industry and supply chain developed this document in development. It will create around 4,000 full time jobs a year and cut power costs. partnership with Community It will also give the renewable energy sector the confidence it needs to invest in renewable projects and help Victorians take control of their energy needs. Power Agency (community Communities across Barwon South West, Gippsland, Grampians and Loddon Mallee have been involved in discussions to help define how Victoria engagement and community- transitions to a renewable energy economy. These Roadmaps articulate our regional communities’ vision for a renewable energy future, identify opportunities to attract investment and better owned renewable energy understand their community’s engagement and capacity to transition to specialists)2, Mondo renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • National Greenpower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit
    National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 Publisher NSW Department of Water and Energy Level 17, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001 T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799 [email protected] www.dwe.nsw.gov.au National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 December 2008 ISBN 978 0 7347 5501 8 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the National GreenPower Steering Group (NGPSG) for their ongoing support of the GreenPower Program. The NGPSG is made up of representatives from the NSW, VIC, SA, QLD, WA and ACT governments. The Commonwealth, TAS and NT are observer members of the NGPSG. The 2007 GreenPower Compliance Audit was completed by URS Australia Pty Ltd for the NSW Department of Water and Energy, on behalf of the National GreenPower Steering Group. © State of New South Wales through the Department of Water and Energy, 2008 This work may be freely reproduced and distributed for most purposes, however some restrictions apply. Contact the Department of Water and Energy for copyright information. Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. DWE 08_258 National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Compliance Audit 2007 Contents Section 1 | Introduction.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Determination and the More Preferable Draft Rule by 24 October 2019
    Australian Energy Market Commission DRAFT RULE DETERMINATION RULE NATIONAL GAS AMENDMENT (DWGM IMPROVEMENT TO AMDQ REGIME) RULE 2019 PROPONENT Victorian Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change 05 SEPTEMBER 2019 Australian Energy Draft rule determination Market Commission Improvement to AMDQ regime 05 September 2019 INQUIRIES Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449 Sydney South NSW 1235 E [email protected] T (02) 8296 7800 F (02) 8296 7899 Reference: GRC0051 CITATION AEMC, DWGM Improvement to AMDQ regime, Draft rule determination, 05 September 2019 ABOUT THE AEMC The AEMC reports to the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) through the COAG Energy Council. We have two functions. We make and amend the national electricity, gas and energy retail rules and conduct independent reviews for the COAG Energy Council. This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism and review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Australian Energy Draft rule determination Market Commission Improvement to AMDQ regime 05 September 2019 SUMMARY 1 The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC or Commission) has made a more preferable draft rule that amends the National Gas Rules to replace the current authorised maximum daily quantity (AMDQ) regime in the Victorian declared wholesale gas market (DWGM) with a new entry and exit capacity certificates regime. These certificates can be purchased by market participants at a primary auction run by AEMO to gain the benefits of injection and withdrawal tie-breaking, congestion uplift protection and some limited curtailment protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Basin Non-Resident Population Projections, 2021 to 2025
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Surat Basin non–resident population projections, 2021 to 2025 Introduction The resource sector in regional Queensland utilises fly-in/fly-out Figure 1 Surat Basin region and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers as a source of labour supply. These non-resident workers live in the regions only while on-shift (refer to Notes, page 9). The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) official population estimates and the Queensland Government’s population projections for these areas only include residents. To support planning for population change, the Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO) publishes annual non–resident population estimates and projections for selected resource regions. This report provides a range of non–resident population projections for local government areas (LGAs) in the Surat Basin region (Figure 1), from 2021 to 2025. The projection series represent the projected non-resident populations associated with existing resource operations and future projects in the region. Projects are categorised according to their standing in the approvals pipeline, including stages of In this publication, the Surat Basin region is defined as the environmental impact statement (EIS) process, and the local government areas (LGAs) of Maranoa (R), progress towards achieving financial close. Series A is based Western Downs (R) and Toowoomba (R). on existing operations, projects under construction and approved projects that have reached financial close. Series B, C and D projections are based on projects that are at earlier stages of the approvals process. Projections in this report are derived from surveys conducted by QGSO and other sources. Data tables to supplement the report are available on the QGSO website (www.qgso.qld.gov.au).
    [Show full text]
  • BUILDING STRONGER COMMUNITIES Wind's Growing
    BUILDING STRONGER COMMUNITIES Wind’s Growing Role in Regional Australia 1 This report has been compiled from research and interviews in respect of select wind farm projects in Australia. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Estimates where given are based on evidence available procured through research and interviews.To the best of our knowledge, the information contained herein is accurate and reliable as of the date PHOTO (COVER): of publication; however, we do not assume any liability whatsoever for Pouring a concrete turbine the accuracy and completeness of the above information. footing. © Sapphire Wind Farm. This report does not purport to give nor contain any advice, including PHOTO (ABOVE): Local farmers discuss wind legal or fnancial advice and is not a substitute for advice, and no person farm projects in NSW Southern may rely on this report without the express consent of the author. Tablelands. © AWA. 2 BUILDING STRONGER COMMUNITIES Wind’s Growing Role in Regional Australia CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Wind Delivers New Benefits for Regional Australia 4 Sharing Community Benefits 6 Community Enhancement Funds 8 Addressing Community Needs Through Community Enhancement Funds 11 Additional Benefts Beyond Community Enhancement Funds 15 Community Initiated Wind Farms 16 Community Co-ownership and Co-investment Models 19 Payments to Host Landholders 20 Payments to Neighbours 23 Doing Business 24 Local Jobs and Investment 25 Contributions to Councils 26 Appendix A – Community Enhancement Funds 29 Appendix B – Methodology 31 References
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Final report August 2015 Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 978-1-76010-260-9 Secretariat Ms Jeanette Radcliffe (Committee Secretary) Ms Jackie Morris (Acting Secretary) Dr Richard Grant (Principal Research Officer) Ms Kate Gauthier (Principal Research Officer) Ms Trish Carling (Senior Research Officer) Mr Tasman Larnach (Senior Research Officer) Dr Joshua Forkert (Senior Research Officer) Ms Carol Stewart (Administrative Officer) Ms Kimberley Balaga (Administrative Officer) Ms Sarah Batts (Administrative Officer) PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3241 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_windturbines This document was produced by the Senate Select Wind Turbines Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ ii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 44th Parliament Members Senator John Madigan, Chair Victoria, IND Senator Bob Day AO, Deputy Chair South Australia, FFP Senator Chris Back Western Australia, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, NATS Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Anne Urquhart Tasmania, ALP Substitute members Senator Gavin Marshall Victoria, ALP for Senator Anne Urquhart (from 18 May to 18 May 2015) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senator the Hon Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ........................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Starfish Hill Wind Farm
    LIA STA TRA RFIS AUS H HIL UTH L WIN A ~ SO D FARM ~ FLEURIEU PENINSUL The Starfish Hill Wind Farm is South Australia’s first wind energy generation venture The Starfish Hill Wind Farm will reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions by up to 2.1 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent during its forecast 25-year operating life. The Starfish Hill Wind Farm has assisted in establishing South Australia as a leader in large-scale renewable energy production in Australia. The 34.5 megawatt (MW) capacity wind farm contributes to the State’s electricity demands and expands the State’s generation sources. Starfish Hill also reduces the State’s reliance on coal and gas and helps avoid the “losses” associated with transporting electricity long distances. The power generated by the wind farm is more than sufficient to meet the annual needs of the Fleurieu Peninsula and Kangaroo Island. Local businesses have developed new skills and expertise in this green energy industry, putting them in a strong position to bid for other similar work not only in South Australia but also interstate. Tarong Energy will be seen as pioneers of wind energy in South Australia The Starfish Hill Wind Farm is South Australia’s first wind farm representing a total investment of $65 million in the State. Starfish Hill provides enough energy to meet the needs of about 18,000 households, representing 2% of South Australia’s residential customers, and it adds 1% to the available generation capacity in South Australia. All electricity generated is sold to AGL for the South Australian domestic market.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Australia
    CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA REPORT 2016 Image: Hornsdale Wind Farm, South Australia Cover image: Nyngan Solar Farm, New South Wales CONTENTS 05 Introduction 06 Executive summary 07 About us 08 2016 snapshot 12 Industry gears up to meet the RET 14 Jobs and investment in renewable energy by state 18 Industry outlook 2017 – 2020 24 Employment 26 Investment 28 Electricity prices 30 Energy security 32 Energy storage 34 Technology profiles 34 Bioenergy 36 Hydro 38 Marine 40 Solar: household and commercial systems up to 100 kW 46 Solar: medium-scale systems between 100 kW and 5 MW 48 Solar: large-scale systems larger than 5 MW 52 Solar water heating 54 Wind power 58 Appendices It’s boom time for large-scale renewable energy. Image: Greenough River Solar Farm, Western Australia INTRODUCTION Kane Thornton Chief Executive, Clean Energy Council It’s boom time for large-scale of generating their own renewable renewable energy. With only a few energy to manage electricity prices that years remaining to meet the large-scale continue to rise following a decade of part of the Renewable Energy Target energy and climate policy uncertainty. (RET), 2017 is set to be the biggest year The business case is helped by for the industry since the iconic Snowy Bloomberg New Energy Finance Hydro Scheme was finished more than analysis which confirms renewable half a century ago. energy is now the cheapest type of While only a handful of large-scale new power generation that can be renewable energy projects were built in Australia, undercutting the completed in 2016, project planning skyrocketing price of gas and well below and deal-making continued in earnest new coal – and that’s if it is possible to throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifying the Project Approval
    Community Newsletter | No.11 | October 2015 Collector Wind Farm: Modifying the Project Approval. RATCH-Australia (‘RATCH’) has now submitted an application to the NSW Department of Planning & Environment (“DoPE”) seeking some minor modifications to the Collector Wind Farm Project Approval. This application proposes a number of changes, as described in our previous newsletters: yyRefinement of site layout (roads, electrical cabling, project buildings) yyIncrease in blade length of the turbine used, within the existing overall height limit yyAdjustment of approval conditions for biodiversity offsetting yyAdjustment of approval conditions relating to background noise Full details of the proposed modifications and assessment of any associated impacts can be reviewed in the final Modification Assessment Report and supporting appendices, which can be downloaded from both the RATCH website and the DoPE’s Major Projects website: yyRATCH: ratchaustralia.com/collector/modification_application.html yyDoPE: majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=3778 Please contact us if you are unable to access the documents online, or if you have any comments or questions about the modification application: Anthony Yeates, phone 02 8913 9407 or by email at: [email protected] Public Exhibition and Submissions: In addition to the online documents, hard If you have any concerns or comments copies of the Modification Assessment Report about the application, you are able to and supporting appendices will also be placed make a submission
    [Show full text]