DOCSLIB.ORG

Long Term Plan – Briefing Agenda Item

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long Term Plan – Briefing Agenda Item Long Term Plan – briefing agenda Date: Monday 30 October 9.30 am Venue: Northern Wairoa War Memorial Hall, Dargaville Item Dargaville Town Plan – 1 presentation from Dargaville Community Development Board NTA Maintenance Contract 2 Peter Thompson District Plan Work Programme Attached document 3 Venessa Anich Social Housing Attached documents 4 John Burt 1903 KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL KAIPARA DISTRICT PLAN: Plan Change Programme of Works 2017-2021 The following is the proposed Plan Change programme for the Kaipara District Plan for the 2017/18 year, plus the first three years of the Long Term Plan 2018-28. Following this table is a timeline for the Plan Change programme. A brief description of a Plan Change process, timeframes and costs is included at the end of this document. PLAN CHANGE NAME REASON COMMENT COMPLEXITY TIMEFRAME This plan change follows the withdrawal of PC2. Decision in late October 2017. Council initiated due to Submission and Hearing stages complete. Decision due. If appealed, may add extra 2 Plan Change 4: Fire Rule rule not achieving the High Appeals to Environment Court are likely, will involve legal costs years before made operative outcomes anticipated. and potential consultant costs (i.e. planning consultant, fire (high estimate). engineer). Coastal Environment Draft Section 32 report due to be completed in November 2017. Notification – May 2018. Intended to notify in May 2018. Will require workshops with Outstanding Natural 2 years after notification to Implementing the Council, and possibly informal feedback period with directly Features Medium implement. This timeframe may Regional Policy affected landowners. be extended by any appeals to Statement (RPS) into Significant Natural Areas Appeals unlikely but possible from interest groups. the Environment Court. DP. Council-initiated because of RMA This timeframe will be impacted requirement. by the ongoing work being This work stream will be ‘paused’ while ongoing work is done by Coastal Hazards High undertaken by NRC regarding NRC regarding the maps. Coastal Hazard Maps, may be late 2018. File3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 Your initials/typists initials 2 PLAN CHANGE NAME REASON COMMENT COMPLEXITY TIMEFRAME Following Council adoption of final Mangawhai Community Plan in Proposed plan changes to be December 2017, necessary plan changes will need to be identified identified in early 2018. Council initiated, and progressed. Mangawhai Community following growth and Section 32 reports and proposed This work will need to be progressed swiftly, as development High Plan development in plan changes notified 2018. pressures are high on the East Coast, and it is important from a Mangawhai. Two years following notification reputational perspective that KDC is progressing plan changes for implementation. which respond to demands and pressures. This will require working with Council to identify areas that are in need of growth/structure planning. Dargaville has already been identified. It is intended that lessons will be leant from the Identified as a priority by Mangawhai Community Plan, and growth planning can get turned Potentially one Growth Area Growth Planning High Council. around on a much tighter timeframe. However, this may be completed every 18 months. affected from a budget perspective, regarding necessary infrastructure which usually allows for integrated developments, and the funding impacts of the LTP on growth planning. Implementing the This review is intended to consider the following issues in the This work is a relatively low Regional Policy KDP: District Plan Review priority, as the priority is giving Statement (RPS) into Historic heritage regarding other Regional effect to the recognized RPS plan DP. Council-initiated Renewable electricity generation Medium Policy Statement changes (as above) and those because of RMA Tangata whenua strategy requirements with statutory timeframes for requirement. This review will determine whether any further changes are notification. needed to the KDP to give effect to the RPS. File 3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 initials 3 PLAN CHANGE NAME REASON COMMENT COMPLEXITY TIMEFRAME The Engineering Standards are a reference document in the KDP. When they are reviewed and updated, the new version must be Council initiated, to keep Plan Changed into the KDP. The Engineering Standards are to be the Standards current Engineering Standards consulted on prior to the Plan Change. This means the Plan Medium Likely to be 2019. they require periodic Change is limited to how the Engineering Standards are review. incorporated into the KDP. This will simplify the process, cost less and limit appeals. Notify in mid-2018 (June) as part Council initiated due to Draft s32 report has been prepared, needs to be finalized, peer of omnibus plan change process. Reverse Maneuvering rule not achieving the Low reviewed, presented to Council. 2 years’ timeframe following outcomes anticipated. notification. 300m separation distance Notify in mid-2018 (June) as part Council initiated due to from intersection of State Draft s32 report has been prepared, needs to be finalized, peer of omnibus plan change process. rule not achieving the Low Highway and Local Road reviewed, presented to Council. 2 years’ timeframe following outcomes anticipated. (Rule 13.10.7) notification. File 3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 initials 4 PLAN CHANGE NAME REASON COMMENT COMPLEXITY TIMEFRAME Notify in mid-2018 (June) as part Removal of Community Council-initiated to Draft s32 report has been prepared, needs to be finalized, peer of omnibus plan change process. Low Outcomes update the Plan. reviewed, presented to Council. 2 years’ timeframe following notification. Technical errors and anomalies: 300m separation distance from Commercial Zone Notify in mid-2018 (June) as part (Rule 13.10.8) Draft s32 report has been prepared, needs to be finalized, peer Council initiated due to of omnibus plan change process. Reserve Management reviewed, presented to Council. Plan Change is the result of Low errors in the drafting. 2 years’ timeframe following Units drafting mistakes. notification. Industrial Zone Rule (Dwellings) Mapping Errors (Te Kopuru and Dargaville) DISTRICT PLAN RESEARCH AND IMPLEMENTATION Complete Strategy which will identify priority areas for monitoring Council-initiated, as best Complete Monitoring Strategy Monitoring Strategy and reporting. Work in conjunction with Monitoring staff, developed Medium practice. early 2018. in accordance with RMA and KDP Monitoring Chapter. File 3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 initials 5 PLAN CHANGE NAME REASON COMMENT COMPLEXITY TIMEFRAME Consider the effectiveness and efficiency of the provisions of the Efficiency and Required under s35 of KDP in achieving the stated objectives. It is intended that this will High Complete by 1 November 2018. Effectiveness Review the RMA. identify plan changes to be investigated in 2019/2020. RESPONSE TO LEGISLATIVE CHANGES There are a number of work streams which will stem from these amendments, which are spread over a number of years, including Central government the possibility to remove chapters from the District Plan This is likely to be an ongoing RMA Amendments High initiated. (Hazardous Substances), chapters which must be removed project over the next five years. (Financial Contributions) and the impact of National Planning Standards on the Kaipara District Plan. The Kaipara District Plan is required to give effect to National Policy Statements, National Environmental Standards, the New This will be an ongoing project, National guidance Zealand Coastal Policy Statement, and the Regional Policy Central government but does not always require the impacts on the Kaipara Statements. Any changes to these higher order documents will High initiated. First Schedule notification District Plan require an analysis of the KDP to ensure compliance. The Ministry process. for the Environment are currently working on new National Policy Statements and National Environmental Standards. File 3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 initials 6 Timeline: Kaipara District Plan Changes 2017-2021 Year Plan Change Stage 2017 Plan Change 3 North City Developments Submissions, Hearing, Decision, Operative. Plan Change 4 Fire Rule Submissions, Hearing, Decision. RPS Plan Changes x 4 S32 Report research. Mangawhai Community Plan Changes S32 Report research. Dargaville Growth Planning S32 Report research. Minor Plan Changes S32 Report research. 2018 Plan Change 4 Fire Rule Appeals. RPS Plan Changes x 4 Notification, submissions. Minor Plan Changes Notification, submissions. Mangawhai Community Plan Changes S32 Report research, notification. Dargaville Growth Planning S32 Report research, notification. 2019 RPS Plan Changes x 4 Hearing, Decision. Mangawhai Community Plan Changes Submissions, Hearing, Decision. Dargaville Growth Planning Submissions, Hearing, Decision. Minor Plan Changes Hearing (if any), Decision, Appeals (if any) Kaiwaka Growth Planning S32 Report research. Other RPS Plan Changes S32 Report research. Engineering Standards S32 Report research. File 3807.09 DP Work Streams Table - October 2017 initials 7 Year Plan Change Stage 2020 RPS Plan Changes x 4 Appeals. Mangawhai Community Plan Changes Appeals. Dargaville Growth Planning Appeals. Other RPS Plan Changes Notification, submissions. Kaiwaka Growth Planning Notification, submissions. Engineering Standards Notification, submissions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council
    Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council Draft Proposed Plan Change to the District / Unitary Plan Managing Risks Associated with Outdoor Use of Genetically Modified Organisms Draft Section 32 Report January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope and Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Development of the Plan Change 1 1.3 Structure of the Report 3 2. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Benefits and Risks 5 2.2.1 Benefits 5 2.2.2 Risks 7 2.3 Risk Management and Precaution 10 2.4 Consultation 12 2.4.1 Community Concerns Regarding GMO Use 12 2.4.2 Māori Perspectives 14 2.4.3 Summary 15 2.5 Synopsis 16 3. THE PLAN CHANGE 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Significant Resource Management Issue 17 3.3 Objectives and Policies 18 3.4 Related Provisions 19 3.4.1 Activity Rules 19 3.4.2 General Development and Performance Standards 20 3.4.3 Definitions 20 4. SECTION 32 EVALUATION 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Alternative Means to Address the Issue 22 4.2.1 Do Nothing 22 4.2.2 Central Government Amendment to the HSNO Act 23 4.2.3 Local Authority Regulation through the RMA 24 4.2.4 Assessment of Alternatives Considered 24 4.3 Risk of Acting or Not Acting 26 4.3.1 Ability to Deliver a Precautionary Approach 27 4.3.2 Proportionate Action and Difficulties Arising From Inaction 29 i 4.4 Appropriateness of the Objectives in Achieving the Purpose of the Act 31 4.5 Appropriateness, Costs and Benefits of Policies, Rules and Other Methods 33 4.5.1 Appropriateness 33 4.5.2 Costs 34 4.5.3 Benefits 36 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ban Single Use Plastic Bags Petition.Pdf
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Recipient: Kaipara District Council, Mayor and Councillors of Kaipara District Council Letter: Greetings, Ban Single-use Plastic Bags in Kaipara 39 Signatures Name Location Date Margaret Baker New Zealand 2017-07-01 Mike Hooton Paparoa, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lyn Little northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wendy Charles Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Stuart W J Brown Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Cotterill Dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elsie-May Dowling Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nick Rountree Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 dido dunlop auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wayne David Millar Paparoa , Kaipara , Northland, New 2017-07-01 Zealand Eve-Marie Allen Northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Grant George Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Talbot Kaiwaka, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Jana Campbell Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Sarah Clements Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Gail Aiken Rawene, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elizabeth Clark Maungaturoto, Alabama, US 2017-07-01 Helen Curreen Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Asta Wistrand Kaitaia, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Rosanna Donovan dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 40 Name Location Date Wes Watson Kaikohe, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nat V East Brisbane, Australia 2017-07-01 Jordan Rakoia Kaipara, New Zealand 2017-07-01 CAREN Davis Mangawhai Heads, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Michelle Casey Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Anna Kingi Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Misty Lang Auckland,
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Coastal Flooding
    Coastal Flooding Exposure Under Future Sea-level Rise for New Zealand Prepared for The Deep South Challenge Prepared by: Ryan Paulik Scott Stephens Sanjay Wadhwa Rob Bell Ben Popovich Ben Robinson For any information regarding this report please contact: Ryan Paulik Hazard Analyst Meteorology and Remote Sensing +64-4-386 0601 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie Wellington 6241 Phone +64 4 386 0300 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: 2019119WN Report date: March 2019 NIWA Project: DEPSI18301 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Michael Allis Formatting checked by: Patricia Rangel Approved for release by: Dr Andrew Laing © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Context for estimating coastal flooding exposure with rising seas ............................. 14 1.1 Coastal flooding processes in a changing climate .................................................. 14 1.2 National and regional coastal flooding exposure ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Environment Court Between
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2014] NZEnvC 182 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) concerning Variation 1 to the Kaipara District Plan, and an appeal under Section 120 of the Act BETWEEN CCALVELEY (ENV-2012-AKL-000138) Appellant MANGAWHAI HEADS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2013-AKL-000012) Appellant AND KAIP ARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: at Aucldand 5-9 and 29-30 May 2014 Court: Enviromnent Judge J J M Hassan Environment Cmmnissioner R M Dunlop Deputy Environment Commissioner J Illingswmth Appearances: Mr A Webb for C Calveley and Mangawhai Heads Holdings Limited Mr M Allan for the Kaipara District Council Mr M Savage for Catherine Hawley, Jolm Hawley, Mangawhai Ratepayers and Residents Association, Marunui Conservation Limited, The Friends of the Brynclmwyns Society Incorporated (section 274 patties) Date of Decision: 27 August 2014 27 August 2014 2 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT The MHHL appeal A: For the reasons set out: (a) The appeal is disallowed in part and the Council's decisions are confitmed to the extent that: (i) Land use consent to establish seven houses on Lot 1 DP 316176 is refused; (ii) The appellant's application for lots 15 and 17 to 20 to be included as pmi of the subdivision of Lots I and 2 DP 316176 is refi.lsed; (b) To allow for the inclusion in the subdivision consent for the subdivision of Lots 1 m1d 2 DP 316176 of conditions that give effect to this decision, we direct tbe Council to confer with the appellant and section 27
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)
    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY INFRASTRUCTURE REFERENCE GROUP UPDATE Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 QUARTERLY IRG UPDATE 2 Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021
    Building Together • Hanga Ngātahi QUARTERLY INFRASTRUCTURE REFERENCE GROUP UPDATE Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 QUARTERLY IRG UPDATE 2 Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 IRG PROGRAMME OVERVIEW .....................................3 PROGRESS TO DATE ................................................4 COMPLETED PROJECTS THIS QUARTER ...........................5 REGIONAL SUMMARY .............................................6 UPDATE BY REGION NORTHLAND ........................................................8 AUCKLAND .........................................................9 WAIKATO ...........................................................10 BAY OF PLENTY ....................................................11 GISBORNE ..........................................................12 HAWKE’S BAY ......................................................13 TARANAKI ..........................................................14 CONTENTS MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI ........................................15 WELLINGTON .......................................................16 TOP OF THE SOUTH ................................................17 WEST COAST .......................................................18 CANTERBURY .......................................................19 OTAGO ..............................................................20 SOUTHLAND ........................................................21 NATIONWIDE .......................................................22 FULL PROJECT LIST ................................................23 GLOSSARY ..........................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • HRE05002-038.Pdf(PDF, 152
    Appendix S: Parties Notified List of tables Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified ........................... 837 Table S2: Interested parties notified .......................................................................... 840 Table S3: Interested Māori parties ............................................................................ 847 Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified Job Title Organisation City Manager Biosecurity Greater Wellington - The Regional Council Masterton 5915 Environment Health Officer Wairoa District Council Wairoa 4192 Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Manager, Animal Containment AgResearch Limited Hamilton 2001 Facility Group Manager, Legal AgResearch Limited Hamilton Policy Analyst Human Rights Commission Auckland 1036 Management, Monitoring & Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs Wellington 6015 Governance Fish & Game Council of New Zealand Wellington 6032 Engineer Land Transport Safety Authority Wellington 6015 Senior Fisheries Officer Fish & Game Eastern Region Rotorua 3220 Adviser Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Programme Manager Environment Waikato Hamilton 2032 Biosecurity Manager Environment Southland Invercargill 9520 Dean of Science and University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 Technology Director National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Wellington 6041 Research Limited (NIWA) Chief Executive Officer Horticulture and Food Research Institute Auckland 1020 (HortResearch Auckland) Team Leader Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Landscapes and Natural Features Kaipara District Includes a Number of Natural Features, Some of Which May Be Considered to Be ‘Outstanding Natural Features’ (Onfs)
    CHAPTER 18 - LANDSCAPES AND NATURAL FEATURES 18 Landscapes and Natural Features Kaipara District includes a number of natural features, some of which may be considered to be ‘Outstanding Natural Features’ (ONFs). 18.1 Introduction At the time of preparing the District Plan, specific mapping or identification of ONFs had not been Section 6(b) of the Resource Management Act identifies as a matter of importance “The protection of Kaipara includes undertaken. The District Plan identifies Issues, Objectives and Policies for these features and identifies the process for how ONFs will be identified and protected in the Kaipara District. outstanding natural features and landscapes from inappropriate subdivision, use and development”. outstanding Outstanding Natural Landscapes landscapes and Regional Context natural features. At a regional level, the Northland Regional Council may also consider the significance of the feature or Kaipara District includes a diverse range of landscapes ranging from exposed coasts, sheltered estuaries, landscape. Given the scale / grain of these assessments a landscape that is considered “outstanding” rivers, steep bush clad hills, riverside flats and rolling farmland. Collectively these varied landscapes within the Kaipara District may not be considered “outstanding” within the Northland Region as a whole. contribute to the character and identity of the Kaipara District and some of these landscapes have been assessed and identified as being ‘Outstanding Natural Landscapes’ (ONLs). At the time of preparing the District Plan, the Council was aware that the Northland Regional Council is undertaking work to map outstanding landscapes, natural character and natural features of the coastal One of the distinguishing characteristics of these landscapes is their degree of ‘naturalness’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Interglacial Sea-Level Record of Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa)
    The last interglacial sea-level record of Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa) Deirdre D. Ryan1*, Alastair J.H. Clement2, Nathan R. Jankowski3,4, Paolo Stocchi5 1MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 5 2School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 3 Centre for Archeological Science, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia 4Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia 10 5NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Coastal Systems Department, and Utrecht University, PO Box 59 1790 AB Den Burg (Texel), The Netherlands Correspondence to: Deirdre D. Ryan ([email protected]) Abstract: This paper presents the current state-of-knowledge of the Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa) last interglacial (MIS 5 sensu lato) sea-level record compiled within the framework of the World Atlas of Last Interglacial Shorelines (WALIS) 15 database. Seventy-seven total relative sea-level (RSL) indicators (direct, marine-, and terrestrial-limiting points), commonly in association with marine terraces, were identified from over 120 studies reviewed. Extensive coastal deformation around New Zealand has prompted research focused on active tectonics, which requires less precision than sea-level reconstruction. The range of last interglacial paleo-shoreline elevations are resulted in a significant range of elevation measurements on both the North Island (276.8 ± 10.0 to -94.2 ± 10.6 m amsl) and South Island (173.1165.8 ± 2.0 to -70.0 ± 10.3 m amsl) and 20 prompted the use of RSL indicators tohave been used to estimate rates of vertical land movement; however, indicators in many instances lackk adequate description and age constraint for high-quality RSL indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver 1.7 Software
    961 1989/160 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT FIRST SCHEDULE ORDER (NO. 2) 1989 PAUL REEVES, Governor·General ORDER IN COUNCIL At Wellington this 12th day of June 1989 Present: HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR· GENERAL IN COUNCIL PURSUANT to section 41 of the Local Government Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following order. ORDER 1. Title and cornrnencernent-( 1) This order may be cited as the Local Government Act First Schedule Order (No. 2) 1989. (2) This order shall come into force on the 1st day of November 1989. 2. New First Schedule substituted-The Local Government Act 1974 is hereby amended by revoking the First Schedule, and substituting the First Schedule set out in the Schedule to this order. 3. Revocation-The Local Government Act First Schedule Order 1989" is hereby consequentially revoked. ·S.R. 1989/85 962 Local Government Act First Schedule Order 1989/160 (No. 2) 1989 SCHEDULE NEW FIRST SCHEDULE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1974 "FIRST SCHEDULE LoCAL AUTHORITIES Part I Regional Councils The Auckland Regional Council The Bay of Plenty Regional Council The Canterbury Regional Council The Hawke's Bay Regional Council The Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council The Nelson-Marlborough Regional Council The Northland Regional Council The Otago Regional Council The Southland Regional Council The Taranaki Regional Council The Waikato Regional Council The Wellington Regional Council The West Coast Regional Council Part 11 District Councils
    [Show full text]
  • ALGIM Member Subscription Service List of Council’S/CCO’S Webinar Subscription Level Pricing Structure
    Published June 2021 ALGIM Member Subscription Service List of Council’s/CCO’s webinar subscription level pricing structure NB. Per annual subscription year of 12 months, a minimum of 24 webinars will be included in the subscription fee. If a Council/CCO does not choose to join the subscription service then the following costs will apply per webinar: $125 individual, $300 Whole Council/CCO (excl. GST) Council ALGIM Webinar Annual Subscription Fee Subscription Level 1 Jul 2021 – 30 Jun 2022 (excl. GST) Auckland Council Christchurch City Council 3 $2,285.00 Dunedin City Council Environment Canterbury Greater Wellington Hamilton City Council Hastings District Council Hutt City Council New Plymouth District Council Palmerston North City Council Rotorua Lakes Council Tauranga City Council Waikato Regional Council Waikato District Council Wellington City Council Whangarei District Council Ashburton District Council Bay of Plenty Regional Council 2 $1780.00 Far North District Council Gisborne District Council Great Lake Taupo District Council Horizons Regional Council Horowhenua District Council Invercargill City Council Kapiti Coast District Council Napier City Council Nelson City Council Manawatu District Council Marlborough District Council Matamata Piako District Council Porirua City Council Queenstown Lakes District Council Selwyn District Council South Taranaki District Council Southland District Council Tasman District Council Thames Coromandel District Council Timaru District Council Upper Hutt City Council Waimakariri District Council
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Scan 2020
    Kaipara, Place, People and Key Trends Kaipara District Environmental Scan 2020 KAIPARA DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN 2020 Contents 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 3 Kaipara – Two Oceans, Two Harbours ............................................................................ 2 3.1 Land around the water – our maunga, awa and moana ............................................ 2 3.2 Geology – bones of the landscape ............................................................................ 7 3.3 Soil – foundation of life .............................................................................................. 9 3.4 Weather and climate ................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Climate change ........................................................................................................ 16 3.6 Distribution of Settlement ......................................................................................... 22 4 Demography – Our people, Our communities .............................................................. 23 4.1 Population nationally ................................................................................................ 23 4.2 Population regionally ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]