KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 - OUR ASPIRATIONS Dec 2020 | Rev D
Kerikeri Paihia
Maunganui Bluff Kaihū Whangārei Parua Bay Tangiterōria Omamari Tangōwahine Omana Ruakaka Dargaville Waiotira Baylys Beach Arapohue Taipuha Waipu Te Kōpuru Paparoa Langs Beach Glinks Gully Matakohe Ruāwai Pahi Maungatūroto Mangawhai Whakapirau Hakaru Kaiwaka
Kellys Bay Tinopai Te Hana Wellsford
Wharehine
Poutō Point Tapora Tauhoa
Mangakure
South Head Glorit
Woodhill Forest Prepared for Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050_Our Aspirations | Spatial Plan - Future Direction
Document Quality Statement Document Control
Version Number: D The following person(s) shall receive a copy of this document upon each subsequent release: Prepared for Kaipara District Council Client: Kaipara District Council Client Representative: Paul Waanders Document Author Resilio Studio / AR & Associates REVISION HISTORY Reviewed by Joao Machado / Gary Marshall Version Publication date Authorised for Issue Joao Machado / Gary Marshall Revision D 23/12/2020
LIMITATIONS
This Spatial Plan has been prepared exclusively for Kaipara District Council on the basis of the brief received by AR & Associates and Resilio Studio. Information, opinions and recommendations contained within it cannot be used by any other entity without the review and written consent of Kaipara District Council. Kaipara District Council accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use or reliance upon this report by any unauthorised third party.
Prepared by
Resilio Studio AR & Associates
10 West Terrace Level 2, 129 Hurstmere Road Newton Takapuna Auckland 1010 Auckland 0622
www.resilio.nz www.arassociates.co.nz
+64 21 591279 North Island: Contact_ Joao Machado [email protected] +64 272 950 386 [email protected]
South Island: Contact_ Gavin Flynn +64 21 704 332 [email protected] KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS Foreword
The mighty Kaipara District has been growing at a pace we have never experienced before, challenging Council’s infrastructure and services. Growth, when it is planned, offers a great opportunity for Kaipara to build on our primary sector farming and horticulture businesses and also encourage other industry sectors which will grow our economy. This spatial plan is our guide for growth, to ensure our towns and farming areas grow at a rate and in ways and locations that are sustainable. It combines the spatial plans across our larger townships and our smaller rural or seaside settlements into one cohesive 30-year long vision and aspirational plan for the district.
In developing these plans we’ve taken time to understand the goals of our community, asking you about the things about your towns now that you want to preserve and about your future vision and hopes. Thank you for taking time to engage with us and adding to this plan for our shared future.
There are also a number of other factors we’ve had to consider in developing this plan.
A key issue faced in other districts has been urban sprawl taking over productive land. Through our Kaipara Kai project, we’ve mapped our most productive areas that are key to our future productivity and employment. This spatial plan will help safeguard that land from being broken up into uneconomic lifestyle units in future.
We’ve also considered the cost of providing infrastructure to sprawling townships. With that in mind, we’ve identified areas where housing density can increase and be supported by existing infrastructure. We’ve also defined areas where our towns can grow, and where our infrastructure, such as water and sewerage services, can be expanded.
Industrial areas have been marked along transport routes and grouped together so industrial outputs such as noise are kept away from residential areas. The Spatial Plan will be used as the basis for a new District Plan that we have started working on and will completed in stages and phased in over the next few years. The Spatial Plans can be used as a source document when considering Resource Consent applications.
Above all, this Kaipara District Spatial Plan is a living document: it will change and adapt as new information becomes available in the future, such as new climate change data and the need to take sea level rise into account. This first December 2020 version is complete and change-ready.
It is our plan – one which reflects those who live, work and play in this community and what’s needed to make our communities vibrant and thrive with the promise of abundant wellbeing of Kaipara te Oranganui.
Nga mihi nui ki a koutou katoa
Dr Jason Smith Mayor of Kaipara District
Dec 2020 | REV D KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS Mihi
Whakatōngia te kākano ki a tipu ia ngā māramatanga.
Mā te ako ka mōhio, mā mōhio ka mārama, mā te mārama ka mātau,
mā te mātau ka ora e!
Sow the seed to nurture understanding.
With learning comes knowledge, with knowledge comes understanding, with understanding comes awareness, with awareness comes wisdom,
with wisdom comes wellness!
Dec 2020 | REV D KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS CONTENTS
Part A | Overview of Kaipara District 6 Part B | Kaipara District Communities 69 1 | Introduction 7 1 | Overview 70 1.1 | Introduction 8 72 2 | Key Urban Areas 1.2 | Overview of the Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050 9 74 1.3 | Kaipara Kickstart Project 13 Mangawhai 76 1.4 | Overview of Engagement 14 Dargaville 77 1.5 | Engagement Process 15 Maungatūroto 80 1.6 | Design Principles 18 Kaiwaka 82 2 | Regional Context 25 3 | North Kaipara 87 Kaihū 94 3 | Planning Context 28 Maunganui Bluff (Aranga Beach) 101 Omamari 108 4 | Functions & Services of Kaipara Settlements 40 Tangiterōria 115 Tangowahine 5 | Economic, Social & Cultural Context 44 4 | Central Kaipara + West Coast 122 127 6 | Transport 51 Baylys Beach 138 Te Kōpuru 145 7 | Kaipara Infrastructure Strategy 55 Glinks Gully 153 Ruāwai 5 | Poutō Peninsula 160 164 Kellys Bay 171 Poutō Point 6 | Kaipara Harbour + East Coast 179 183 Paparoa 191 Pāhi 199 Matakohe 206 Tinopai 214 Whakapirau 222 Hakarū
Part C | Overview of Engagement 229 1 | Overview of Engagement 230
2 | Mana Whenua Engagement 232 240 3 | Overview of Consultation
Dec 2020 | REV D KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS
Part A | Overview of Kaipara District
Dec 2020 | REV D KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS
Chapter 1 | Introduction
Dec 2020 | REV D 7 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.1 | Introduction
The Kaipara District Council wishes to enable sustainable development for the numerous urban, peri-urban, rural and coastal communities which characterise the Kaipara District. This is being pursued through a spatial planning process that complements the work for the Kaipara KickStart programme and the Kaipara Infrastructure Strategy work currently underway through the Long-Term Plan 2021-2031. The district-wide spatial plan, together with the spatial plan for the Key Urban Areas (Mangawhai, Dargaville, Maungatūroto, and Kaiwaka), will flow into a future statutory District Plan review process.
A spatial plan is a holistic approach for the development and management of resources, community social infrastructure and the identification of adequate infrastructure to improve the future social, economic, cultural and environmental well-being of a community. Well-being can be measured through many different indicators, such as Council surveys, health data, environmental monitoring and economic information.
The Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050 collates the constraints, challenges, insights and opportunities brought together from phases two and three of the area-wide Kaipara District spatial planning process for Kaipara’s rural communities. It is a descriptive collection of the constraints and opportunities analysis and a summary of the community engagements, workshops and online interviews.
Through this document, the Kaipara District Council is setting the direction for each of the rural settlements and wider Kaipara District’s environments, and to further involve project partners, stakeholders and the wider community in a collaborative shared space leading up to the district plan review and future development opportunities in the Kaipara District.
Engagement was conducted with the following communities:
• Baylys Beach • Tangiterōria • Matakohe • Glinks Gully • Tangowahine • Pāhi • Hakarū • Te Kōpuru • Paparoa • Kaihū (including Aranga and Omamari) • Tinopai • Poutō Point • Kellys Bay • Whakapirau • Ruāwai
The rāhui imposed due to the Covid-19 global pandemic, and New Zealand going into Covid-19 Alert Level 4 lockdown in March 2020, halted the ‘live’ engagement hui for the spatial plan. In order to properly and safely engage with the remaining communities, feedback was gained through interviews conducted via online platforms and through targeted interviews conducted over the phone and via online meeting platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Skype, and Zoom. There have been some limitations with this approach, in terms of reaching people and engaging with a wider reach of the communities in Kaipara. Further involvement from the communities, mana whenua, key stakeholders, and other partner organisations was pursued during the public consultation period in June - July 2020.
Part B of the Draft Kaipara District Spatial Plan Ngā Wawata 2050 — Our aspirations sets out the future direction and address the most pressing issues that each community has to overcome to enable sustainable development. The Kaipara District Spatial Plan Ngā Wawata 2050 — Our aspirations signals how the vision for each settlement will be taken forward to inform the future Kaipara District Plan Review (programmed for 2021-2023) and infrastructure planning processes such as the Kaipara Infrastructure Strategy and the various initiatives that will sit within that strategy.
Dec 2020 | REV D 8 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.2 | Overview of the Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050
Purpose A Living Document Exclusions & Assumptions
The purpose of the spatial plan is to create • Planning horizon • Incomplete Information a framework for future growth in the • Alignment with other plans and • Climate Change Data & Particularly Sea Disrict's rural and coastal villages and to documents Level Rise + Coastal Inundation help leverage growth and development • Living Document opportunities associated with the overflow This spatial plan has a 30-year planning of the Auckland region’s growth and the horizon to not only align with Council’s 30- This district-wide spatial plan has been latent tourism potential. This planning will year Infrastructure Strategy (2021-2051) but prepared based on information, studies, also enable and support other agencies in also allow the land-use changes to evolve and data available at the time the work health, education and business to provide in a staged and considered manner. This is was undertaken. For example, there were the right services at the right time. The achieved by balancing growth and economic limitations in the level of detail of the spatial plan intends to support the future development in appropriate areas, while topographical Lidar data, sea-level rise, and wellbeing of existing and future residents protecting other areas for rural production, effects of climate change for the district in who may make the choice to live in these environmental enhancement, community general. As a result of that, the extent of centres, including future residents. resilience in the face of climate change, and ‘zone areas’ must be further refined through long-term community well-being. future processes – in particular as the Kaipara District Council works through the The Objectives of the Spatial Plan This spatial plan is intended to be monitored, Resource Management Act requirements for reviewed, and updated as required to the Kaipara District Plan review programmed The Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā ensure it remains current and continues to to start in 2021-2023. Wawata 2050 aims to achieve the following provide community and decision-makers objectives_ with the information required to make informed decisions about Kaipara District’s • Understanding the dynamics, communities - through the outcomes Like the spatial plans for the district’s Key drivers and infrastructure needed to identified in the spatial plans for the district’s Urban Areas – Mangawhai, Dargaville, support connected development and four Key Urban Areas and this district-wide Maungatūroto, and Kaiwaka – this spatial coordinated functions between Kaipara’s spatial plan. plan is a ‘living document’ and the outcomes settlements, villages and towns. identified here will be subject to future • Management of natural resources The relationship and integration of this processes and studies due to come out in including the mountains, lakes, wetlands, adopted spatial plan with other planning the next 1-2 years and beyond. In particular, soils, coastal edges, waterways, native processes is described in the diagram below. the Northland Regional Council is due forests and the Kaipara Moana (Harbour) It shows contributing inputs (i.e. the spatial to release further information on climate and how people should act when they plans followed by neighbourhood or town- change, sea-level rise, coastal inundation, are in these special places. specific structure plans) and outputs (i.e. versatile soils (rural production), and • Developing a sustainable approach the future district plan review) resulting flooding matters in respect of the whole to how all rural and coastal land will from this spatial plan process. It shows of the Northland Region. It is anticipated be managed for cultural, commercial, the alignment and close relationship with that the outcomes of these studies will conservation and community-based infrastructure planning and delivery to substantially influence future decisions activities. enable the key upgrades required to enable that will be made through the upcoming • Work with Kaipara’s Mana Whenua/ the outcomes identified in this spatial plan. implementation of the Kaipara District’s tangata whenua and communities to The Kaipara Infrastructure Strategy is a key spatial plans adopted between May and ensure they are informed of the project, delivery mechanism for the Kaipara District December 2020. provide genuine input through the to achieve the aspirations captured in this process and have buy-in and ownership spatial plan. of the outcomes.
Dec 2020 | REV D 9 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.2 | Overview of the Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050 Cont.
The spatial plan project methodology | Indicative time-line consisted of seven phases over a period of 9 months; extended to 12 months due to delays imposed by the Covid-19 global pandemic and in order to pursue meaningful PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 and value-add engagement with Mana Project Initiation Constraints, Setting the Option Review Feedback Prepare and Share Produce & Present Challenges and Direction + Initial Development, and Agree Changes Draft Spatial Plan for the final Spatial Whenua, key partner organisations and Opportunities Engagement Testing and Final Review Plan stakeholders, and the Kaipara District Assessment Evaluation + communities inputting into the various Consultation towns, villages and settlements high-level 30-Year Plans.
DECEMBER 2019 FEBRUARY-MARCH MARCH-MAY JUNE-JULY AUG-SEPTEMBER SEP-OCTOBER OCT-NOV 2020
Confirming project Gather information Setting the Utilising Collate & agree Generate draft Finalise the Spatial brief, programme, including regional vision, spatial information & the changes to Spatial Plan for Plan following deliverables, roles context and local plan principles insights gathered the draft Spatial review through feedback from and responsibilities environmental, & assessment through previous Plan key themes decision making previous phase societal, cultural, criteria. Produce phases, generate consultation structure economic draft Spatial Plan development document The Final Draft and enabling Strategy initial preferred option following Plan will be infrastructure and engagement for whole of feedback from adopted by analysis with identified district showing the consultation the council in villages and linkages and evaluation December 2020 settlements, and relationships key stakeholder between groups. settlements. Public consultation period: 6 July to 31 July
Dec 2020 | REV D 10 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.2 | Overview of the Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050 Cont.
This map shows the locations of Kaipara’s key urban towns, rural towns, villages, and rural and coastal settlements that the spatial plan focuses on. It provides a visual reference to the relationship each place has Whangārei to each other, the larger centres outside of the district and how the road and rail line Mauganui Bluff Kaihū infrastructure links them all together. It also gives a clear perspective of how much of the district is rural land and how many of the settlements have a water connection, be it Tangiterōria the Kaipara West Coast, the Kaipara Harbour or the expansive rivers networks including the Wairoa, Kaihū, or Kaiwaka rivers. Omamari Tangowahine
Dargaville Baylys Beach Bream Bay Waipu
Te Kōpuru
Glinks Gully Paparoa Maungatūroto Mangawhai
Ruāwai Matakohe Kaiwaka Hakaru Whakapirau Pahi
Tinopai Kellys Bay
Wellsford Legend Kaipara Harbour
Centre Poutō Point
Rail line Warkworth
Kaipara District Border
1 State Highway Scale: 1_550 000@A3 Te Tai-o-r ē Hua
0 5 10 20km
Dec 2020 | REV D 11 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.2 | Overview of the Kaipara District Spatial Plan - Ngā Wawata 2050 Cont.
| Kaipara District Spatial Planning | Relationship to Infrastructure Workstreams + Economic Strategy + Long Term Plan The Kaipara District spatial planning workstreams diagram below shows the inputs and outputs from the district-wide SPATIAL PLAN ECONOMIC DISTRICT PLAN spatial planning process. It also shows (MANGAWHAI DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (WHOLE OF PLAN REVIEW OR the alignment and close relationship KEY URBAN AREAS ROLLING REVIEW THROUGH PLAN with infrastructure planning and delivery SUB-REGIONAL SPATIAL PLAN) CHANGES) to enable the key upgrades required to implement the spatial plan. STRUCTURE PLAN (URBAN CENTRES)
LONG TERM PLAN INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICING PROJECTIONS (STRATEGY) (PRELIMINARY) LONG TERM PLAN (AND 3-YEARLY ANNUAL PLANS) INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCIAL STRATEGY
Dec 2020 | REV D 12 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.3 | Kaipara Kickstart Project
The Kaipara Kickstart programme aims to promote economic development projects to diversify and grow the Kaipara economy. It has three streams (Kai, Wharves, and Roads) working together to build economic momentum.
Investments in Kaipara’s economic growth and community wellbeing commenced early 2019 through the allocation of a total of $28.98 million by the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF), New Zealand Transport Agency and Kaipara District Council. The fundamentals of this include improving the reliability and safety of roads, increasing wharf infrastructure, tourism, and employment opportunities, and in particular the kai business opportunities in horticulture and aquaculture. As a result, the Kaipara KickStart package comprises three interlocked projects – Kai (Growing the Kai in Kaipara), Wharves (Kaipara Moana Activation Plan) and Roads. Overall, the KKS project outcomes look to align with the PGF objectives, being:
• Creating jobs, leading to sustainable economic growth, • Increasing social inclusion and participation, • Enabling Māori to realise aspirations in all aspects of the economy, • Encouraging environmental sustainability and helping New Zealand meet climate change commitments alongside productive use of land, water, and other resources, and • Improving resilience, particularly of critical infrastructure, and by diversifying our economy.
Kaipara Kai_ Kaipara currently accounts for 1.2% of NZ’s land mass, accommodates 0.5% of the population and contributes to approximately 1.1% of kai (food) production. Research reveals Kaipara is underperforming in comparison to its neighbours in producing agricultural output from its land, and in matching its performance to that of Thames- Coromandel, Waikato, Hauraki and others – it has the potential to inject ~$20 million to ~$230 million directly into the regional GDP. In saying this, Kaipara Kai has a strong base on which to build on new opportunities to increase food production in the Kaipara District. In fact, the greatest concentration of high value soils in the Kaipara District is predominantly in the river delta between Poutō-Te Kōpuru to Dargaville- Ruāwai, stretching out to Kaihū - the North Kaipara Agricultural Delta.
Kaipara Wharves_ The Kaipara Water Transport and Wharves Feasibility Study looks to encourage water-based transportation methods that allow for variations in ways we can connect communities, support and attract residents, tourists and businesses to and within the Kaipara District. The Kaipara Moana Activation Plan aims to develop the biggest harbour in New Zealand, enabling tourism operators and locals to use the wharves to improve their income and employment opportunities. This workstream looks to support increased economic, social and environmental resilience for the district as part of the broader Kaipara Kickstart Programme. It supports the strategic direction for Northland provided by the Tai Tokerau Economic Development Action Plan, the Māori Economic Development Strategy, the district’s Long-Term Plan and numerous regional transport planning initiatives. The development of marine facilities and asset management initiatives will form part of the 30-year water transport network delivery programme, bringing back life to the historic primary mode of transport on water.
Roads_ The Roads project within Kaipara Kickstart seeks to improve safety and resilience of the current road network. Having a reliable and safe network allows for comfort in connectivity between Kaipara’s businesses, marae and the community. Roads are one of the main transportation options to get food to markets and for tourists to enjoy all the district has to offer. Investing in the existing road network will improve safety, resilience, comfort and speed of commutes on unsealed roads.
Dec 2020 | REV D 13 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.4 | Overview of Engagement
A core aspect of the community Overview of Engagement The phases of engagement that were engagement process includes codesign undertaken for this spatial plan utilised workshops as part of community meetings. Community workshops were held with the ‘International Association for Public The core steps of the process are: the engagement focusing around themes Participation (IAP2) Spectrum of for community aspirations, constraints, Participation’ method as well as the Speed 1. Establish shared Community Values and heritage, social needs (soft infrastructure), Planning methodology for workshops Aspirations services and transport (hard infrastructure), (discussed further in Part C). 2. Community Audit economic development, and environmental 3. Constraints, Challenges and issues. The following groups were involved in the Opportunities key decisions regarding the process: 4. Draft Spatial Plan The rāhui imposed due to Covid 19 halted 5. Review and Feedback the ‘live’ engagement hui for the spatial • Project Partners i.e. Tangata Whenua Iwi 6. Refined Spatial Plan plan. In order to properly and safely engage Authorities, hapū and marae, Northland with the remaining communities, feedback Regional Council and the Kaipara was gained through interviews conducted Harbour Integrated Management Group. via online platforms. The time and effort to • Key Stakeholders i.e. Community partake in the revised engagement format groups, special interest groups and key was thoroughly appreciated. influences in the community • Wider Community i.e. Local residents and the wider Kaipara District community.
| Summary of Engagement
COMMUNITY CONSTRAINTS, REFINED COMMUNITY DRAFT REVIEW & VALUES & CHALLENGES & SPATIAL PLAN AUDIT SPATIAL PLAN FEEDBACK ASPIRATIONS OPPORTUNITIES ADOPTED [EMPOWER] [INVOLVE] [INFORM] [EMPOWER] [INVOLVE] [INFORM]
Dec 2020 | REV D 14 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.5 | Engagement Process
Summary of Engagement Programme Step 1 - Project Phase 3 The methods of engagement during each of The primary means of engagement with The wider project team has benefitted (Setting the Direction + Initial Engagement) Phases 3 and 5 of the project are outlined these groups were through: from wider public engagement through the below briefly: Key Urban Areas Spatial Plan (Dargaville, Step 2 - Project Phase 4 • Kanohi ki te kanohi - Face to face Maungatūroto and Kaiwaka) and the Kaipara (Option Development, Testing and Step 1 - Project Phase 3 (Setting the meetings (in person as allowed or via Wharves Feasibility Study project, which Evaluation + Consultation) Direction + Initial Engagement)_ online platforms) covered in many respects some of the same communities including mana whenua and • Key stakeholders were contacted directly • Presentations to key stakeholders, youth engagement undertaken in October for their input whilst the wider public project partners, and public community 2019. Some of the communities engaged was reached via existing communication groups through these other projects included channels that Kaipara District Council Ruāwai, Paparoa, Tinopai, Poutō Point, has with its residents. Feedback was • Participatory workshops during ‘early Whakapirau and Pāhi. It is noted also that captured and incorporated into ‘early engagement’ held in Paparoa Primary the previous engagement initiatives included insights’ and provided with mapped School, Tinopai School, Pāhi Hall, and various hui with mana whenua as part of information to assist in understanding Kellys Bay Hall. both these other projects - with the addition the opportunities and constraints of Kaipara District Council’s own ‘Rohe Tour’ associated with the area. The initial • Hui with Mana Whenua (visiting different held in 2019. engagement was substantially disrupted marae) by the Covid-19 global pandemic and the start of Alert Level 4 lockdown in New • Online and printed surveys Zealand. • Community open days or drop-in • The project team continued engaging sessions held in July at the following through Covid-19 Alert Levels 4 places: lockdown and subsequent Alert Levels 3 • Te Kōpuru - held at the Te Kōpuru and 2 - due to the lockdown restrictions, School Hall, which also involved these were conducted over Zoom or residents from Glinks Gully and Poutō other virtual meeting platforms or over Point the phone. • Kaihū - held at the Kaihū Rugby Club, including residents from Omamari Step 2 - Project Phase 4 (Option and Maunganui Bluff Development, Testing and Evaluation + • Baylys Beach - held at the Northern Consultation)_ Wairoa Golf Club, and • Hakarū - held at the Hakarū RSA. • Utilising information and insights gathered through the previous phases - the ‘early insights’ draft spatial plan was made available for consultation in July 2020. The consultation period ran from 6 July 2020 until 09 August 2020. During this time, events were held as ‘drop-in’ sessions, in which local residents were welcome to attend at any time to discuss the spatial plan with representatives from the project team and the Kaipara District Council.
• During the consultation period, the ‘draft spatial plan’ was available online for viewing and with a targeted online survey link available to the public. In total, 27 submissions were received, along with additional written submissions where members of the community and key stakeholders felt they needed to provide additional input.
Dec 2020 | REV D 15 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.5 | Engagement Process Cont.
Summary of Mana Whenua Feedback • Mana Whenua sees the Te Aranga • Future development should be balanced Principle – Mana Rangatiratanga with maintaining the uniqueness of the The following Mana Whenua and (authority) as a means to improve history, character and people within representatives were engaged: their relationship with the Kaipara Kaipara’s communities. There is potential District Council. They would like KDC to in places like Ruāwai, to tell the stories • Te Iwi o Te Roroa recognise them as iwi and to engage at of the land pre-1840 similar to the • Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust a level as partners, as guaranteed under Tongariro tracks which are governed • Ripia Marae Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the LGA, RMA and by Māori and tell a Māori story. There is • Naumai Marae the guidelines set out in common law potential for tourism development to • Taita Marae like those in the Environment Court. The take into account the historical value iwi would like KDC to recognise their of natural resources in the area, for Mana Whenua provided feedback with the mana rangatiratanga over the natural, example, a tourism trail including glow key themes outlined below and further physical, spiritual and other taonga/ worm track at Matakohe, mountain climb detailed in Part C: resources including their knowledge/ at Tokatoka, glow worms at Montgomery mātauranga of the natural world (cycles, Bush. As such, there is great potential for • Mana Whenua supported the general plant sourcing, whenua etc). They aspire tourism opportunities by capitalising on core Māori Values from a physical to work with the natural world for low- Māori whakapapa within the local district design perspective with suggestions impact and sustainable development. (Ruāwai, Naumai, Raupō, Tokatoka). to amend some meanings to reflect the relationship in shared experiences, • In terms of their ongoing relationship • District-wide planning should provide partnerships and a sense of belonging with KDC when planning for current options for co-design and co- through working together. This would and future needs of their villages and/ management and co-governance in allow for authentic engagement to occur or marae, Mana Whenua would like establishing affirmative actions of as these are the basis of mātauranga to maintain “Kanohi ki te kanohi hui co-existence within such parameters. Māori. The practicality of mātauranga (meaning meetings face-to-face)” at Recognising principles of the Treaty Māori is that it is lived in everyday life. the relevant marae and would like to will reach a significant milestone in see consistency with the kōrero from recognising the outcomes of partnership, • Mana Whenua resonate with the Te Council. This will allow space for mahi active protection and mutual benefits, Aranga Principles and suggested tahi (working together) to take place in further honouring the significance of additional meanings for the principles order to come up with a collaborated Taita Marae. to better understand Māori culture i.e. plan based on honesty and trust from Whakapapa (reinstating the traditional both sides. • Overall, the current needs of the names for historical areas), Mana, Taiao marae surrounds the need for (the natural environment), Mauri Tū • It must be understood by KDC that Māori papakāinga development, infrastructure (environmental health), Mahi toi (creative believe themselves to be of nature and maintenance, weed and pest control expression of cultural practices), Ahi part of the natural world. Collaboration along the awa, in addition to improving Kā (the living presence), and Tohu (the around planning and design should be the capacity of the marae to deliver wider cultural landscape). Successful the result of both entities knowledge, work experience, apprenticeships/ engagement with Māori is understanding and the overarching principles of internships, workshops in finance, the fullness of these principles as the sustainability and protection. Mana governance, submission writing and concepts intertwine with the core values Whenua feel they should always be funding applications. and are relevant on any platform i.e. hui, included in any planning, especially if it documentation, agreements. concerns whenua, wai, moana and āngi (land, water, sea and air). Mana Whenua would like to be informed, trained, and invited to workshops to allow them to take control of sharing important information or getting things done with their own people through their own kawa and tikanga procedures - for Māori, by Māori.
Dec 2020 | REV D 16 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.5 | Engagement Process Cont.
Summary of Project Partners Northpower Limited Aggregate and Quarry Association (AQA) Waka Kotahi (New Zealand Transport + Key Stakeholders Feedback Agency - NZTA) • To support Kaiparas growth over the • Over 500 additional homes will be The following project partners and key next 30 years, Northpower suggests that required to accommodate a population • NZTA would like to see transport stakeholders were engaged with the the spatial plan should clearly address increase of 7% within Kaipara alone, with infrastructure integrated into the vision following key themes taken from the all forms of essential infrastructure each requiring an average of 250 tonnes statements across all settlements in feedback and further detailed in Part C: required to service the rural hinterland, of aggregate (125,000 tonnes overall). Kaipara. coastal settlements and other functions Significant quantities of aggregate • Particular regard should be given to Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) and services of settlements. Particularly will also be required for infrastructure development along the State Highways in relation to the requirements of growth and maintenance in both Kaipara which may affect the function of • Horticulture’s main concern was around electricity distribution networks and and adjoining growth areas of Northland these networks and result in reverse appropriate infrastructure being put in communications / fibre networks. This and Auckland. sensitivity effects. The State Highways place prior to development (such as will help identify and solve any potential • AQA would like to see attention given are designated for long distance, high flood control works along riverbanks), a effects on Northpower’s existing assets to the planning provisions to provide volume through traffic which can be planning framework that manages the within Kaipara as well as plan for adequate access to quarry resources compromised if many access points are interface between activities, where they capacity upgrades that will be required at workable locations to reduce proposed. are located (protecting highly productive in the future as a result of development. costs of building and infrastructure • NZTA noted that upgrades to rail will land), and reverse sensitivity effects. • Northpower considers that its electricity development and maintenance. For only be for freight movements and that distribution network has capacity to every 30 kilometres aggregate travels there are potential noise, vibration and Fonterra Limited meet the needs of the Kaipara District from a quarry, the cost of aggregate reverse sensitivity effects on residential for the next 20 years based on an doubles. Therefore, quarries need to be (or other sensitive activities) activities • Fonterra is mostly concerned about average electricity load growth of up to located close to their markets to reduce that expand towards the rail lines. protecting existing industry and 2%. However, beyond this, reinforcement transport costs, congestion and carbon agriculture (in line with NRPS) as it of the network may be required by emissions. The Department of Conservation (DOC) is crucial for the economic growth in making land available for additional zone • The definition of ‘primary production’ Kaipara and should be protected from substations and lines. in the spatial plan needs to align with • DOC has highlighted the value of this future planning decisions. Fonterra the NPS which recognises quarrying spatial plan and that future planning considers that the spatial plan should New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) as a primary production activity. is critical to all communities in and focus future residential growth away AQA suggests that all relevant policy around Kaipara to “ensure that New from the site and other established • The New Zealand Defence Force’s main frameworks should recognise that Zealanders gain a wide range of benefits industrial activities to avoid the conflict concern relates to Poutō Point which is aggregate extraction and processing from healthy functioning ecosystems, between incompatible land uses and situated within military operations area activities may need to occur in sensitive recreation opportunities, and through reverse sensitivity effects. 106 and opposite military operating areas if there are no suitable and living our history”. area 103. These areas are designated economically feasible alternative sites • DOC has stressed the importance of safety areas which become active when available. considering the impacts of increasing live firing or exercises involving high growth and tourism on the environment. explosives are being undertaken. NZDF Although responsibility is a balancing is primarily interested in the water act, caution should be undertaken in a transport opportunities and the increase considered fashion. in ferry movements as a result of a new wharf. Although it is expected that the wharf will be small and is to enable “slow tourism” with limited sailings occurring per day, NZDF wishes to be consulted on proposals in this area to depict the level (if any) of impact or unduly restrictions on their operations.
Dec 2020 | REV D 17 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050_OUR ASPIRATIONS 1.6 | Design Principles
Design principles help to guide the possible future development of the Kaipara District. Core Māori Values The design principles are organised under three headings, Core Māori Values, Te • Rāngatiratanga - Self determination • Wairuatanga - Spirituality • Mātauranga - Māori world view Aranga Design Principles, Landscape Design Principles, and Community Design Principles. • Kaitiakitanga - Guardianship • Kōtahitanga - Unity
• Manaakitanga - Hospitality • Whānaungatanga - Kinship
Te Aranga Design Principles
Mana Rāngatiratanga Taiao Ahi Kā
Whakapapa Mauri Tū
Tohu Mahi Toi
Community Design Principles
Kaitiakitanga / Guardianship /Stewardship
Engagement Legibility Treasured
Diversity Accessibility Safety
Integration of uses Resilience + adaptation Revitalisation
Connectivity Celebration Feasibility + viability
Dec 2020 | REV D 18 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.6 | Design Principles Cont.
Core Māori Values
The key objective of Te Aranga Māori Design values and principles is to enhance the protection, reinstatement, development and articulation of Mana Whenua’s cultural landscapes and to enable all of us (Mana Whenua, matāwaka, tauiwi and manuhiri) to connect with and to deepen our collective appreciation of ‘sense of place’. The following core Māori values have informed the development of the outcome-oriented Te Aranga Māori Design Principles:
• Rāngatiratanga - Self Determination • Kaitiakitanga- Guardianship • Manaakitanga - Hospitality • Wairuatanga - Spirituality • Kōtahitanga - Unity • Whānaungatanga - Kinship • Mātauranga - Māori World View
While Te Aranga Design Principles are well recognised throughout New Zealand, it is important to note that in keeping with the principle of Mana rāngatiratanga, it should not be assumed that Mana Whenua want to use these principles to inform their contribution to the current and future spatial design processes. Whether to use this framework or not, it should be confirmed as part of the initial engagement with the relevant iwi authorities.
Through engagement and detailed discussion with Mana Whenua, Te Aranga Design Principles have been adopted for this project. A range of opportunities have been identified and as the spatial plan develops, these will be prioritised and refined with guidance and involvement from Mana Whenua. Te Aranga Design Principles can be implemented in a number of Kaipara District projects such as new bridges, gateways, cycle and walking paths, public squares, parks, facilities such as public toilets, and public buildings such as new libraries.
Dec 2020 | REV D 19 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.6 | Design Principles Cont.
Te Aranga Design Principles
Mana Rāngatiratanga Tohu Mauri Tū Ahi Kā
The status of iwi and hapū as Mana Mana Whenua sites and cultural landmarks Ecology, water and soils are recognised Iwi / hapū have a living and enduring Whenua is recognised and respected and are acknowledged, managed, protected and and protected. The quality of wai, whenua, presence that is secure and valued within appropriately addressed in the design enhanced, where appropriate, to reinforce a ngahere and hau takiwā are actively their rohe - this can be through customary, environment. sense of place and identity. monitored, and community wellbeing is cultural and commercial dimensions which enhanced. are delivered through kaitiaki roles. Attributes: Attributes: Attributes: Attributes: • Provides a platform for working • Acknowledges a Māori world view of the relationships where Mana Whenua wider significance of tohu / landmarks • The wider development area and all • Mana Whenua live, work and play within values, world views, tikanga, cultural and their ability to inform the design of elements and developments within their own rohe. narratives and visual identity can be specific development sites. the site are considered on the basis of • Acknowledges the post Treaty of appropriately expressed in the design • Supports a process whereby significant protecting, maintaining or enhancing Waitangi settlement environment environment. sites can be identified, managed, mauri. where iwi living presence can include • High-quality treaty based relationships protected and enhanced. • The quality of wai, whenua, ngahere and customary, cultural and commercial are fundamental to the application of the • Celebrates local and wider unique hau takiwā are actively monitored. dimensions. other Te Aranga principles cultural heritage and community • Community well-being is enhanced. • Living iwi / hapū presence and characteristics that reinforce a sense of associated kaitiaki roles are resumed place and identity. within urban areas
Whakapapa Taiao Mahi Toi
Māori names, Tūpuna, narratives and The natural environment is protected, Iwi/ hapū narratives are captured and customary practices are celebrated and revitalised and/or enhanced to levels where expressed creatively and appropriately into honoured to enhance the sense of place Mana Whenua harvesting is possible and the design by iwi mandated design / art connections. native ecosystems restored to clean and professionals. acceptable levels. Attributes: Attributes: Attributes: • Recognises and celebrates the • Ancestral names, local tohu and iwi significance of Mana Whenua ancestral • Sustains and enhances the natural narratives are creatively reinscribed names. environment. into the design environment including • Recognises ancestral names as entry • Local flora and fauna which are familiar landscape; architecture; interior design points for exploring and honouring and significant to Mana Whenua are key and public art. tūpuna, historical narratives and natural landscape elements within urban • Iwi / hapū mandated design customary practices associated with and/or modified areas. professionals and artists are development sites and their ability to • Natural environments are protected, appropriately engaged in such enhance sense of place connections. restored or enhanced to levels where processes. sustainable Mana Whenua harvesting is possible.
Dec 2020 | REV D 20 KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 1.6 | Design Principles Cont.
The purpose of the spatial plan is to create the use of stopbanks to manage flooding Rural & Coastal Environments The district-wide spatial plan has been a framework for future growth in the risk in places like Ruāwai, noting that in formulated with the objectives and policies District's rural and coastal villages and to some areas the stopbanks need to reduce The community wishes to enhance coastal of the NPS 2020 influencing future direction, help leverage growth and development the risk of seawater infiltration into the and ecological restoration in the district’s principles and decision-making. In particular, opportunities associated with the overflow groundwater. settlements such as Maunganui Beach, Te Aranga Design Principles and Māori of the Auckland region’s growth and the Omamari, Glinks Gully, and Baylys Beach on values have been included in preparing latent tourism potential. This planning While areas of natural significance and the west coast and Mangawhai on the east the spatial plan, including engagement exercise will also enable and support other indigenous biodiversity were identified in coast. These settlements are characterised with Mana Whenua, local communities agencies in health, education and business the maps presented to the communities for by the coastal cliffs, sand dunes and and developers. The feedback gathered to provide the right services at the right feedback, additional areas of protection beaches, much like the other settlements from these groups was incorporated into time. The spatial plan intends to support the were pointed out. Kellys Bay for example along the west coast and within the Kaipara the spatial plan-making process ultimately future wellbeing of existing residents and has a native forest with Kiwi birdlife that the Harbour. influencing outcomes and the direction set future residents who may make the choice community wanted ongoing protection for. in respect of each of the towns, settlements to live in these centres, including future In other settlements such as Glinks Gully, For example, Baylys Beach has natural and villages - plus the spaces in-between. residents. Poutō and Matakohe, native vegetation or assets such as the dunes, cliffs and heavily forested ecological corridors were vegetation that are to be enhanced The following spatial planning principles identified, with urban expansion located and maintained via native revegetation have directed the way in which this spatial away from these areas. Additionally, places initiatives, removal of pest species and plan has been formed, aligning with the like the Maunganui Bluff contain indigenous invasive weeds, appropriate beach objectives of the National Policy Statements, species to be protected such as blue access provision to avoid damage to the as detailed in Appendix A: penguins, fairy terns, toheroa, mussels and coastal environment (in particular dunes the seal colony. As such, urban expansion stabilisation), and stormwater runoff Highly Productive Land has been enabled in areas away from management to avoid pollutant discharge those recognised to be of environmental via outlets directly to the receiving water Urban expansion is avoided on land that significance both to the community and bodies. In doing so, the spatial plan enables contains versatile soils, to relieve the of national importance, ensuring ongoing development opportunities in Baylys pressure of finite resources and recognise protection of Kaipara District’s indigenous Beach while protecting and enhancing the values and benefits associated with biodiversity. the characteristics, qualities and uses of its use for primary production now and the coastal environment by sustainably into the future. Open space with suitable Climate Change & Natural Hazards managing development and avoiding areas climate, size, and accessibility required for subject to coastal hazards. productive land in the Kaipara District are Given the spatial plan has a 30-year also identified in the settlements. Productive horizon, climate change and other natural Urban Growth land contributes to the ‘Kai’ leg of the hazards have been taken into account - The key spatial planning principles outlined Kaipara Kick Start Programme, therefore including flooding risk and sea level rise. For above ensure that the outcomes of the it is crucial that the 30-year vision for the example residential intensification has been spatial plan protects, enhances or maintains Kaipara District protects the importance minimised significantly in places like Ruāwai the natural and physical resources important of rural productive land from urbanisation given the effects of sea-level rise and flood to the economic and social wellbeing of or inappropriate land-use while enabling risks which have high costs associated with the Kaipara District such as freshwater commercial (urban) growth in appropriate infrastructure (salinisation of freshwater quality, renewable energy, minerals found locations. from ocean, water supply to land that may in the coastal environment, including areas not be viable in 30 years). This allows for with high natural character, landscape and Freshwater & Indigenous Biodiversity settlements to be liveable, safe and free of amenity values. hazards. Further evidence sea-level rise is The spatial plan identifies water bodies, expected in 2021 - 2022 which will further While urban expansion is avoided in these freshwater ecosystems, significant influence decisions on how affected villages areas, it is also encouraged in appropriate indigenous biodiversity and areas of natural and centres may grow over the next 30+ and suitable locations. The Kaipara District significance to be protected and enhanced. years. is developing and changing over time in For example, the spatial plan identifies response to the diverse and changing proposed riparian planting along water needs of people, communities and future bodies such as the Wairoa River, to reduce generations. The areas identified for urban siltation run-off into waterways and improve expansion will achieve social, economic and water quality overall. Other measures also cultural wellbeing while stimulating growth that is not at an unreasonable expense to the community or burden on infrastructure.
Dec 2020 | REV D 21 Poster Two The maps below describe different aspects of Dargaville’s physical environment - Dargaville’s physical environment Are we missing anything? Land form, land stability + slope Soils + land use capability Water, flooding and vegetation cover
This plan provides an overview of the landform and geotechnical constraints and No Overlay Land Susceptible Liquefaction Settlement This plan provides an overview of the land most suitable for cultivation. KEY The plan below illustrates the type and extent of existing vegetation cover and areas KEY to Geohazards Susceptibility Susceptibility opportunities for development. The map considers geohazards, susceptibility to liquefaction Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk LAND USE CAPABILITY prone to flooding in the local area. The areas of flooding include typical flooding and WATER, FLOODING VEGETATION medium high medium high and soil settlement. The Darkest grey indicates the least suitable land for development. high The information is based on information from Land use capability (LUC) handbook larger flooding events - 1 in 50 year and 1 in 100 year events. Land Susceptible Class 2: Arable. Good land; slight Class 5: Non-arable. Unsuitable for Flood Wairoa River 100 years Herbaceous (Wetlands) Risk high limitations cropping to Geohazards the website (ourenvironment.scinfo.org.nz). LUC land into classes from 1 to 8. 1 is Flood Wairoa River 50 years Native Scrub Liquefaction Risk medium Class 3: Arable. Moderate limitations; The map is based on information from the website ourenvironment.scinfo.org.nz and a the most suitable for production and 8 is the least suitable. Classes 1 - 4 are suitable Class 6: Non-arable. Productive The information is based on information from the website ourenvironment.scinfo. Susceptibility restricting crop types pastoral hill country Flood Wairoa River currently Exotic Scrub KAIPARA DISTRICT SPATIAL PLAN - NGĀ WAWATA 2050 Risk high Geotechnical Assessment report from ENGEO Limited. for multiple productive uses including extensive cropping, grazing and forestry. Class 4: Arable. Severe limitations Class 7: Non-arable. Moderate to org.nz. Risk medium for arable or cultivation very severe limitations Native Forest Settlement Classes 5 and 6 are suitable for grazing and/or forestry. Classes 7 and 8 are not Susceptibility Risk high Class 8: Non-arable. Very severe to Exotic Forest 1.6 | Design Principles suitable for productive uses. extreme limitations
Cont. H SUN PAT MER SUM UM ME S R S EA B WINTER R SUN P EE Landscape Planning Principles Formation of Constraints Maps ATH ZE
Design with Natural Systems PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - CIRCULATION + ACCESS PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - LAND FORM, LAND STABILITY + SLOPE
S U M M E Identify, maintain, protect and enhance R
/
A
U critical and vulnerable landscape features. T U
M At a minimum this should include overland N
S
T
O
flow paths, floodplains, wetlands, Significant R M Ecological Areas and stands of mature S
vegetation, fertile soils and steep and P R
E V erodible slopes. A I L I N G W
IN D S Design with Water Catchments PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - SOILS + LAND USE CAPABILITY Design and plan at the scale of the water catchment to ensure the integration of water, ecology, land-use and infrastructure. Infrastructure + utilities Circulation + access Planning + landuse Respond to Existing Landscape
CharacterThe plan below illustrates the extent of the main freshwater and wastewater KEY The plan below illustrates the main infrastructure, public transport and the travelling distance at 5 minutes and 15 KEY This plan provides an overview Kaipara District Plan land use zones KEY networks including pump stations, treatment plants and reservoirs. INFRASTRUCTURE + UTILITIES minutes for bicycles and pedestrians. ACCESS+ CIRCULATION including Residential, Maori Purpose Business Commercial and Business DISTRICTS Identify, maintain, protect and where Wastewater Reticulation/Rising Industrial and Rural usage. Pump Station Mainroads Residential Business: Commercial appropriate, enhanceThe information the is based existing on Kaipara District character Asset Management Plans. Main The Cadastral, Road and Aerial photo information is based on GIS Information from LIZNZ (Land Information New KAIPARA SPATIAL PLANNING - Dargaville Kaiwaka Maungaturoto Water Reticulation Treatment Plant Zealand) Database and Targomo. Targomo analyses travel distance for Cars, Bicycles and Pedestrians. Biking radius 15min The information is based on Kaipara District Plan. Maori Purpose: Maori Land Business: Industrial of a place, including protecting and Walking radius 15min Dargaville - Infrastructure + Utilities Treatment Plant Reservoir Rural designing around special natural and PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - WATER, FLOODING AND VEGETATION cultural features of the site including but not KEY During the development of the spatial plan, limited to Outstanding Natural Landscapes, SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT maps identified geotechnical constraints sites of cultural significance, notable (geohazards, susceptibility to liquefaction vegetation, ridges, rocks, view lines, edges Less suitable for development and soil settlement), fertile soil and and boundaries. The design and placement suitability for cropping, existing vegetation of building(s) should respond sensitively cover overland flow paths and areas prone to existing topography and landforms, to flooding were overlaid in to determine particularly ridgelines. which areas of land are more or less suitable for development. The above map summaries the physical constraints and opportunities More suitable for development Design for Climate Change for Dargaville - The lighter the area the more suitable it is for development. Where required, respond and where possible, design and plan for the effects of climate change, particularly with regards to coastal erosion and inundation.