Exposure to Coastal Flooding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exposure to Coastal Flooding Coastal Flooding Exposure Under Future Sea-level Rise for New Zealand Prepared for The Deep South Challenge Prepared by: Ryan Paulik Scott Stephens Sanjay Wadhwa Rob Bell Ben Popovich Ben Robinson For any information regarding this report please contact: Ryan Paulik Hazard Analyst Meteorology and Remote Sensing +64-4-386 0601 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie Wellington 6241 Phone +64 4 386 0300 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: 2019119WN Report date: March 2019 NIWA Project: DEPSI18301 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Michael Allis Formatting checked by: Patricia Rangel Approved for release by: Dr Andrew Laing © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Context for estimating coastal flooding exposure with rising seas ............................. 14 1.1 Coastal flooding processes in a changing climate .................................................. 14 1.2 National and regional coastal flooding exposure ................................................... 16 2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Coastal Flood Mapping ........................................................................................... 17 2.2 Exposure mapping of elements at risk ................................................................... 26 3 Results .................................................................................................................... 30 3.1 LIDAR DEM .............................................................................................................. 30 Coastal flooding exposure from sea-level rise .................................................................. 49 3.2 National DEM .......................................................................................................... 51 3.3 Combined national Exposure to ESL1 + 3m Sea-Level Rise .................................... 55 4 Discussion and conclusions ...................................................................................... 58 4.1 Applying Coastal Flood Exposure Information ....................................................... 58 4.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 62 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 63 6 Glossary of abbreviations and terms ........................................................................ 66 7 References ............................................................................................................... 68 Appendix A MHWS-10 heights around New Zealand ............................................ 70 Appendix B Local MSL offsets .............................................................................. 74 Appendix C Digital Appendix Contents ................................................................ 75 Tables Table 1-1: National and regional level exposure of elements at risk to ESL1 for present-day MSL on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 8 Table 1-2: National and regional level exposure of elements at risk to ESL1 +0.3 m SLR above present-day MSL on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 9 Table 1-3: National and regional level exposure of elements at risk to ESL1 +0.6 m SLR above present-day MSL on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 10 Coastal Flooding Exposure Under Future Sea Level Rise for New Zealand Table 1-4: National and regional level exposure of elements at risk to ESL1 +0.9 m SLR above present-day MSL on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 11 Table 1-5: National and regional level exposure of elements at risk to ESL1 +1.2 m SLR above present-day MSL on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 12 Table 1-6: Combined national and regional level element exposure for ESL1 +3 m above present-day MSL (where SLR is calculated in meters above 1986-2005 baseline) on land with available LIDAR DEM and satellite DEM coverage. 13 Table 2-1: Summary of methods used to calculate MHWS-10 and ESL1 levels. 19 Table 2-2: Use categories reported for New Zealand buildings. 27 Table 2-3: A summary of 'three-waters' node types included in this study. 28 Table 2-4: Reported land cover categories from Land Cover Database Version 4.1. 28 Table 3-1: A summary of national level element exposure to ESL1 at present-day MSL and future SLR scenarios (where SLR is calculated in meters above 1986-2005 baseline) on land with available LIDAR DEM coverage. 31 Table 3-2: National level element exposure estimated for +0.1 m SLR increments. ‘Greyed’ values are above or equal to the mean increment exposure per +0.1 m SLR. Airports and sites are excluded due to their small datasets. 32 Table 3-3: National level element exposure for ESL1 0-3 m above present-day MSL (where SLR is calculated in meters above 1986-2005 baseline) on land with Satellite DEM coverage (i.e. LIDAR DEM coverage unavailable). 54 Table 3-4: Combined national and regional level element exposure for ESL1 +3 m above present-day MSL (where SLR is calculated in meters above 1986-2005 baseline) on land with available LIDAR DEM and satellite DEM coverage. 56 Table 4-1: Approximate years, from possible earliest to latest, when specific SLR increments (metres above 1986–2005 baseline) could be reached for projected SLR scenarios in the New Zealand region (adapted from Table 11 from MfE, 2017). 60 Figures Figure 1-1: Schematic diagram of tidal, weather and climate components contributing to extreme sea-levels and storm-induced coastal flooding. 15 Figure 2-1: New Zealand coastline showing designated as estuarine or open (sheltered or exposed) coastlines for modelled wave setup elevations in extreme sea-level analysis. 19 Figure 2-2: Linear relationship between MHWS and 1% AEP storm-tide derived from New Zealand sea-level gauges. 20 Figure 2-3: Estimated ESL1 levels around the New Zealand coastline. 22 Figure 2-4: LIDAR DEM coverage for New Zealand’s coastline (Note: Satellite DEM provides nationwide coverage). 23 Figure 2-5: Comparison of coastal inundation in Tauranga Harbour estimated from dynamic (left) and bathtub models (right). 25 Figure 2-6: Comparison of coastal inundation in Poverty Bay (Gisborne District) estimated from dynamic (left) and bathtub models (right). Note the larger coastal inundation extent created by the bathtub model. 25 Figure 3-1: National and regional level population exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 33 Coastal Flooding Exposure Under Future Sea Level Rise for New Zealand Figure 3-2: National and regional level building exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 34 Figure 3-3: National and regional level building replacement value (2016 $NZD Billion) exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 35 Figure 3-4: National and regional level road exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 36 Figure 3-5: National and regional level railway exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 37 Figure 3-6: National and regional level airport exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 38 Figure 3-7: National and regional level electricity transmission line (‘transline’) exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 39 Figure 3-8: National and regional level electricity structure exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 40 Figure 3-9: National and regional level electricity site exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 41 Figure 3-10: National and regional level three-waters infrastructure node exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast and Canterbury regions). 42 Figure 3-11: National and regional level three-waters infrastructure pipeline exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 43 Figure 3-12: National and regional level built land exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 44 Figure 3-13: National and regional level production land exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 45 Figure 3-14: National and regional level natural or undeveloped land exposure for land areas with LIDAR DEM coverage (No data available for West Coast region). 46 Figure 4-1: New Zealand
Recommended publications
  • Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay
    Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Kaikohe-Hokianga 2 Opotiki District Council Coast Otorohanga District Council Kawhia Otorohanga Rotorua District Council Rotorua Lakes South Waikato District Council Tirau Taupo District Council Turangi-Tongariro Thames-Coromandel District Council Coromandel-Colville Mercury Bay Tairua-Pauanui Thames Whangamate Waikato District Council Huntly Community Board Ngaruawahia Community Board Onewhero-Tuakau Community Board Raglan Communtiy Board Taupiri Community Board Waipa District Council Cambridge Te Awamutu Western Bay of Plenty District Council Katikati Community Board Maketu Community Board Omokoroa Community Board Te Puke Community Board Waihi Beach Community Board Whakatane District Council Murupara Ohope Beach Rangitaiki Taneatua Whakatane 3 Hastings District Council Rural Community Board Horowhenua District Council Foxton New Plymouth District Council Clifton Inglewood Kaitake Waitara Rangitiki District Council Ratana Community Board Taihape Community Board Ruapehu District Council National Park Waimarino-Waiouru South Taranaki District Council Egmont Plains Eltham Hawera-Normanby Patea Tararua District Council Dannevirke Eketahuna Wanganui District Council Wanganui Rural 4 Hutt City Council Eastbourne Community Board Petone Community Board Wainuiomata Community Board Kapiti Coast District Council Otaki Paraparaumu/Raumati Waikanae Paekakariki South Wairarapa District Council Featherston Greytown Martinborough Wellington City Council Makara-Ohariu
    [Show full text]
  • Weekend School Programme 2021
    Inclusivity: LIANZA Aoraki Weekend School 2021 Saturday 15th – 16th May Weekend School hosted across two venues by NMIT Library, Nelson and Tūranga, Christchurch Welcome to Inclusivity: LIANZA Aoraki Weekend School 2021. Come celebrate our diverse communities and share how we reflect these to create more inclusive libraries. This two day event will consist of a range of speakers from library assistants to managers, sharing their knowledge of recognising and connecting to individuals and their uniqueness. Our aim is to make the ideas, inspiration and knowledge shared during the weekend accessible to members across our region. For this reason, live events will be held in both Christchurch and Nelson locations with live streaming (LS) between. Participants in each location will see speakers face-to-face and watch live streaming of talks from the other location, with interactive technology enabling attendees to ask questions and participate at both sites. This weekend is also about library professionals taking the time to network and socialise with one another, and throughout the weekend there will be time for discussion and an evening social event. Saturday 15th May 2021 All sessions in Christchurch will be held in the Spark Place, He Hononga | Connection, Ground floor, Tūranga. Sessions in Nelson will be held at NMIT Library. Talks will be live streamed between the two sites. 10:00am Registration, morning tea and networking (Christchurch and Nelson) 10:25am Welcome to Inclusivity: LIANZA Aoraki Weekend School - Christchurch LS to Nelson
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council
    Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council Draft Proposed Plan Change to the District / Unitary Plan Managing Risks Associated with Outdoor Use of Genetically Modified Organisms Draft Section 32 Report January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope and Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Development of the Plan Change 1 1.3 Structure of the Report 3 2. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Benefits and Risks 5 2.2.1 Benefits 5 2.2.2 Risks 7 2.3 Risk Management and Precaution 10 2.4 Consultation 12 2.4.1 Community Concerns Regarding GMO Use 12 2.4.2 Māori Perspectives 14 2.4.3 Summary 15 2.5 Synopsis 16 3. THE PLAN CHANGE 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Significant Resource Management Issue 17 3.3 Objectives and Policies 18 3.4 Related Provisions 19 3.4.1 Activity Rules 19 3.4.2 General Development and Performance Standards 20 3.4.3 Definitions 20 4. SECTION 32 EVALUATION 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Alternative Means to Address the Issue 22 4.2.1 Do Nothing 22 4.2.2 Central Government Amendment to the HSNO Act 23 4.2.3 Local Authority Regulation through the RMA 24 4.2.4 Assessment of Alternatives Considered 24 4.3 Risk of Acting or Not Acting 26 4.3.1 Ability to Deliver a Precautionary Approach 27 4.3.2 Proportionate Action and Difficulties Arising From Inaction 29 i 4.4 Appropriateness of the Objectives in Achieving the Purpose of the Act 31 4.5 Appropriateness, Costs and Benefits of Policies, Rules and Other Methods 33 4.5.1 Appropriateness 33 4.5.2 Costs 34 4.5.3 Benefits 36 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ban Single Use Plastic Bags Petition.Pdf
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Recipient: Kaipara District Council, Mayor and Councillors of Kaipara District Council Letter: Greetings, Ban Single-use Plastic Bags in Kaipara 39 Signatures Name Location Date Margaret Baker New Zealand 2017-07-01 Mike Hooton Paparoa, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lyn Little northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wendy Charles Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Stuart W J Brown Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Cotterill Dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elsie-May Dowling Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nick Rountree Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 dido dunlop auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Wayne David Millar Paparoa , Kaipara , Northland, New 2017-07-01 Zealand Eve-Marie Allen Northland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Grant George Maungaturoto, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Lisa Talbot Kaiwaka, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Jana Campbell Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Sarah Clements Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Gail Aiken Rawene, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Elizabeth Clark Maungaturoto, Alabama, US 2017-07-01 Helen Curreen Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Asta Wistrand Kaitaia, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Rosanna Donovan dargaville, New Zealand 2017-07-01 40 Name Location Date Wes Watson Kaikohe, New Zealand 2017-07-01 Nat V East Brisbane, Australia 2017-07-01 Jordan Rakoia Kaipara, New Zealand 2017-07-01 CAREN Davis Mangawhai Heads, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Michelle Casey Auckland, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Anna Kingi Mangawhai, New Zealand 2017-07-02 Misty Lang Auckland,
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman District Council Tasman Dc Lidar 2016-17
    TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL TASMAN DC LIDAR 2016 -17 VOLUME 11327 B01NOK Summary Project AAM was engaged by Tasman District Council to undertake the Aerial Imagery and LiDAR survey over part of Tasman encompassing coastal areas from Riwaka in the south to Onekaka in the north. To this end, LiDAR data was captured from a fixed wing aircraft between 13 th - 14 th of December 2016. Data Products supplied in this volume as follows: • Ancillary files: • Flight Trajectories in Shapefile • Project Extent and Tile Layout in Shapefile Format • Project Report • Orthophotos in GeoTIFF/TFW • LiDAR data in NZVD2016 & Nelson 1955 • Classified Point Cloud in LAS 1.2 • Ground Point Cloud in LAS 1.2 • Non Ground Point Cloud in LAS 1.2 • TIN in ESRI Terrain • Digital Elevation Model – ESRI ASCII Grid, 1m interval • Digital Surface Model - ESRI ASCII Grid, 1m interval • 0.5m Contour in Shapefile The vertical accuracy for this dataset is 0.06m RMS, and the horizontal accuracy is 0.50m RMS. This dataset is supplied in NZTM2000 map projection, and in two vertical datums – NZVD2016 and Nelson 1955, (using NSN55-NZVD16). (Ref: PWNZ 11327B, PW 27308B) AAM NZ Limited 6 Ossian Street, Napier, New Zealand Phone +64 296 030 382 Other Offices: Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, Wollongong, Newcastle, Whyalla, Kuala Lumpur TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL CONTENTS Page Nos. 1. Project Report ........................................................................................................... 3 2. Data Installation .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hawke's Bay Three Waters Detailed Analysis
    Hawke’s Bay Three Waters © Morrison Low Business Case of Three Waters Service Delivery Options Except for all client data and factual information contained herein, this document is the copyright of Morrison Low. All or any partJuly of 20it 20 may only be used, copied or reproduced for the purpose for which it was originally intended, except where the prior permission to do otherwise has been sought from and granted by Morrison Low. Prospective users are invited to make enquiries of Morrison Low concerning using all or part of this copyright document for purposes other than that for which it was intended. Document status Ref Approving Director Date 2484 Dan Bonifant 17 May 2019 2484v2 Dan Bonifant 22 May 2019 2484v3 Dan Bonifant 21 June 2019 2484v4 Dan Bonifant 19 June 2020 2484v5 Dan Bonifant 03 July 2020 2484 Final Dan Bonifant 29 July 2020 © Morrison Low Except for all client data and factual information contained herein, this document is the copyright of Morrison Low. All or any part of it may only be used, copied or reproduced for the purpose for which it was originally intended, except where the prior permission to do otherwise has been sought from and granted by Morrison Low. Prospective users are invited to make enquiries of Morrison Low concerning using all or part of this copyright document for purposes other than that for which it was intended. Contents Executive Summary 1 Purpose of this review 1 The case for change 3 Introduction 21 National context - a timeline of reform 21 Regional context 24 Covid-19 25 Methodology 26 Project
    [Show full text]
  • Forbes Ecology
    Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP, April 2013 Summary of Freshwater Periphyton Sample Processing & Results prepared by Ryder Consulting June 2013 Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP: Freshwater Periphyton Summary April 2013 2 Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP, April 2013 Summary of Freshwater Periphyton Sample Processing & Results prepared by Brian Stewart, PhD. Ben Ludgate, MSc. Ryder Consulting June 2013 Ryder Consulting Limited PO Box 1023 Dunedin New Zealand Ph: 03 477 2119 Fax: 03 477 3119 Ryder Consulting Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP: Freshwater Periphyton Summary April 2013 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background...................................................................................................................4 1.2 Objectives .....................................................................................................................4 2. Laboratory Analysis .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General..........................................................................................................................4 2.2 Chlorophyll a analysis ..................................................................................................4 2.3 Ash-Free Dry Mass (AFDM) .......................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Far North District Council Library Service Delivery Review
    AGENDA STRATEGY COMMITTEE COUNCIL CHAMBER MEMORIAL AVENUE KAIKOHE WEDNESDAY 22 November 2017 COMMENCING AT 01:00 PM Committee Membership Chairperson Mayor John Carter Councillor Ann Court Community Board Chairs Councillor Colin Kitchen Adele Gardner Councillor Dave Hookway Mike Edmonds Councillor Felicity Foy Terry Greening Councillor John Vujcich Councillor Mate Radich Councillor Sally Macauley Deputy Mayor Tania McInnes Vacant position Document number A1913270 STRATEGY COMMITTEE MEMBERS REGISTER OF INTERESTS Responsibility (i.e. Member's Proposed Declaration of Interests Nature of Potential Interest Name Chairperson etc) Management Plan Board Member of the Local Government Hon John Protection Board Member of the Local Government Protection Carter QSO Programme Programme Carter Family Trust Felicity Foy I will abstain from any debate and voting on proposed plan change items for the Far North District Plan. I will declare a conflict of interest with any planning Director - Northland I am the director of a planning and development matters that relate to Planning & consultancy that is based in the Far North and have resource consent processing, Development two employees. and the management of the resource consents planning team. I will not enter into any contracts with Council for over $25,000 per year. I have previously contracted to Council to process resource consents as consultant planner. I am the director of this company that is the company Flick Trustee Ltd trustee of Flick Family Trust that owns properties on Weber Place and Allen Bell Drive. Document number A1931104 Page 1 of 7 STRATEGY COMMITTEE MEMBERS REGISTER OF INTERESTS Responsibility (i.e. Member's Proposed Declaration of Interests Nature of Potential Interest Name Chairperson etc) Management Plan This company owns several dairy and beef farms, and also dwellings on these farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity Commission Thank You for the Opportunity to Participate in This Review. South Wairarapa District Council Supports T
    Productivity Commission Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this review. South Wairarapa District Council supports the submissions made by Local Government New Zealand, and Society of Local Government Managers. In addition, we have commented briefly to some of the questions from this small, rural, local authority's perspective. Ql What other differingcircumstances across councils are relevant for understanding local governmentfunding and financingissues? SWDC is a small local authority with a large geographical area. In addition, one of our idiosyncrasies, shared by a few others, is that we have three towns of roughly the same size 1,800 to 2,500 population each. It is therefore difficult to get economies of scale, we have three of everything.... Libraries, pools, halls .... In particular, changing legislation has required three wastewater systems, treated wastewater to land. This is a $30M project across 4,000 connections. South Wairarapa District Council supports the submissions made by Local Government New Zealand, and Society of Local Government Managers. Q2 What explains the differencebetween the amount that councils account for depreciation and the amount spent on renewing assets? Are changes needed to the methods councils use to estimate depreciation? If so, what changes are needed? The difference is that depreciation rates do not reflect reality. SWDC has moved away from funding based on depreciation to funding based on forward works programs. We have modelled our infrastructural asset network (a significant proportion of this modelling included actual asset inspection) out to 2106. This modelling allowed us to significantly reduce the amount we rate funded (by nearly 50%). We still a rte fund the same amount, but have been able to use divert funding to pay for the wastewater to land project.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)
    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
    [Show full text]