DOCSLIB.ORG

East West Link Board of Inquiry New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East West Link Board of Inquiry New Zealand EAST WEST LINK BOARD OF INQUIRY NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY BUNDLE OF AUTHORITIES VOLUME 1 Case Law (A-Z) 1. Arrigato Investments Ltd v Auckland Regional Council (2001) 7 ELRNZ 193 (CA). 2. Calveley v Kaipara District Council [2014] NZEnvC 182. 3. Cookson Road Character Preservation Society Inc v Rotorua District Council [2013] NZEnvC 194. 4. Darby v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2007] NZRMA 420 (ENC). 5. Dye v Auckland Regional Council [2002] 1 NZLR 337 (CA). 6. Elderslie Park Ltd v Timaru [1995] NZRMA 433 (HC). 7. Envirofume Ltd v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [2017] NZEnvC 12. 8. Environmental Defence Society Inc v The New Zealand King Salmon Company Ltd [2014] NZSC 38. 9. Friends and Community of Ngawha Inc v Minister of Corrections [2002] NZRMA 401 (HC). 10. J F Investments Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council EnvC C48/06, 27 April 2006. 11. KPF Investments Ltd v Marlborough District Council [2014] NZEnvC 152. 12. Kuku Mara Partnership (Forsyth Bay) v Marlborough District Council EnvC W025/02, 16 July 2002. 13. Meridian Energy Limited v Central Otago District Council [2011] 1 NZLR 482 (HC). 14. Minhinnick v Minister of Corrections EnvC A043/2004, 6 April 2004. 15. New Zealand Rail v Marlborough District Council [1994] NZRMA 70 (HC). 16. New Zealand Transport Agency v Architectural Centre Inc [2015] NZHC 1991. 17. North Shore City Council v Auckland Regional Council [1997] NZRMA 59 (EnvC). 18. Pukekohe East Community Society Inc v Auckland Council [2017] NZEnvC 27. 19. Queenstown Airport Corporation Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2013] NZHC 2347. VOLUME 2 Case Law (A-Z) 20. Queenstown Lakes District Council v Hawthorn Estate Limited [2006] NZRMA 424. 21. Queenstown Central Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2013] NZHC 815. 22. Queenstown Central Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2013] NZHC 817. 23. R J Davidson Family Trust v Marlborough District Council [2016] NZEnvC 81. 24. R J Davidson Family Trust v Marlborough District Council [2017] NZHC 52. BF\57036247\1 | Page 1 25. Re P & I Pascoe Ltd [2014] NZEnvC 255. 26. Re Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited [2012] NZEnvC 206. 27. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [2017] NZEnvC 45. 28. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Auckland Council [2017] NZHC 980. 29. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Buller District Council and West Coast Regional Council [2013] NZHC 1346. 30. Saddle Views Estate Ltd v Dunedin City Council [2014] NZEnvC 243, [2015] NZRMA 1. 31. Villages of NZ (Mt Wellington) Ltd v Auckland City Council EnvC Auckland A023/09, 20 March 2009. 32. Westfield New Zealand Ltd v Upper Hutt City Council EnvC Wellington W44/01, 23 May 2001. Board of Inquiry Decisions 33. Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel Report to Auckland Council – Overview of recommendations on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan, 22 July 2016 (extract). 34. Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Ara Tuhono – Puhoi to Wellsford Road of National Significance: Puhoi to Warkworth Section, 2 September 2014 (extract). 35. Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Peka Peka to North Otaki Expressway Proposal, 12 February 2014 (extract). 36. Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the NZTA Waterview Connection Proposal, June 2011 (extract). 37. In Central Plains Water Trust Joint Decision and Recommendation of Independent Commissioners, 28 May 2010 (extract). BF\57036247\1 | Page 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Auckland District
    I hereby give notice that a meeting will be held on: Date: Tuesday 8 June 2021 Time: 9:30am Meeting Room: Boardroom Venue: Ground Floor, Auckland Town Hall, 301 Queen Street THE AUCKLAND DISTRICT LICENSING COMMITTEE APPLICATION FOR ON LICENCE RENEWAL BY COOK BROTHERS BARS FORT STREET LIMITED AT 16-20 FORT STREET, AUCKLAND, 1010 TO TRADE AS MR MURDOCHS MEMBERS Chairperson Marguerite Delbet Member Patricia Reade Member Richard Pamatatau Laura Ager HEARINGS ADVISOR Contact Telephone: or 027 247 2794 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz WHAT HAPPENS AT A HEARING At the start of the hearing, the Chairperson of the District Licensing Committee will introduce the Panel Members sitting on the hearing committee and he/she will briefly outline the procedure for the hearing. The chairperson also confirms that they and the committee members don’t have any conflicts of interest and are able to consider the application impartially. The Chairperson may then call upon the parties present to introduce themselves to the committee. The Chairperson is addressed as Mr Chairman or Madam Chair. Any party intending to give written or spoken evidence in Māori or speak in sign language should advise the hearings advisor at least five working days before the hearing so that an interpreter can be provided. Catering is not provided at the hearing. The Hearing Procedure The usual procedure for a District Licensing Committee Hearing is: • The applicant will be called upon to present his/her case either personally or through a representative. The applicant may be represented by legal counsel or consultants and may call witnesses in support of the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting: Why Bother?
    1 Voting: Why Bother? OTENE: My name is Otene Reweti, and I work for Auckland Council. My job tonight is to open our time up here at another Auckland Conversation. My karakia that I will use tonight is the council standard, actually — Whakataka te Hau — and it talks about the winds and the cold. The winds that blow on to the land, the winds that blow offshore,and the winds that bring the cold, the snow, the frost. But every day, as the sun breaks through the dawn, it gives us a glimpse of, perhaps, a glorious day. To me, that talks about the voting as well, because is it going to be a wind of change? Is it going to be the normal wind that blows into Tamaki Makaurau? Whatever the wind that blows, perhaps let our blessing be that it brings a glimpse of something glorious for Tamaki Makaurau. Let us give thanks this evening for that. Your part in this, as you know, to those who usually attend the Conversations, when you hear the words "tuturu whakamaua kia tena", your response is "tena". We're going to have a practice because people like to have a practice. Here we go. Tuturu whakamaua kia tena. CROWD: tena! OTENE: OK, 'tena' sounds really tired this evening. (laughter) We want "tena!" because we're looking forward to something tonight, looking forward to the conversation that's going to happen. - Tuturu whakamaua kia tena! - CROWD: tena! OTENE: That's much better. tena's wide awake. Your next response — after the words "haumi e, hui e", your response is "taiki e".
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Environment Court Between
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2014] NZEnvC 182 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) concerning Variation 1 to the Kaipara District Plan, and an appeal under Section 120 of the Act BETWEEN CCALVELEY (ENV-2012-AKL-000138) Appellant MANGAWHAI HEADS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2013-AKL-000012) Appellant AND KAIP ARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: at Aucldand 5-9 and 29-30 May 2014 Court: Enviromnent Judge J J M Hassan Environment Cmmnissioner R M Dunlop Deputy Environment Commissioner J Illingswmth Appearances: Mr A Webb for C Calveley and Mangawhai Heads Holdings Limited Mr M Allan for the Kaipara District Council Mr M Savage for Catherine Hawley, Jolm Hawley, Mangawhai Ratepayers and Residents Association, Marunui Conservation Limited, The Friends of the Brynclmwyns Society Incorporated (section 274 patties) Date of Decision: 27 August 2014 27 August 2014 2 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT The MHHL appeal A: For the reasons set out: (a) The appeal is disallowed in part and the Council's decisions are confitmed to the extent that: (i) Land use consent to establish seven houses on Lot 1 DP 316176 is refused; (ii) The appellant's application for lots 15 and 17 to 20 to be included as pmi of the subdivision of Lots I and 2 DP 316176 is refi.lsed; (b) To allow for the inclusion in the subdivision consent for the subdivision of Lots 1 m1d 2 DP 316176 of conditions that give effect to this decision, we direct tbe Council to confer with the appellant and section 27
    [Show full text]
  • Property Information Resources Guide Resources for Property Research
    Auckland Council Archives Property information resources guide Resources for Property Research • When researching a property, a good place to start is with a property file which can be ordered via the Auckland Council website. These files are managed by the Building Consents Department. https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/buying-property/order-property-report/Pages/order-property-file.aspx • A property file provides documents such as building and resource consent documents and any correspondence with the Council about the property. • The contents of the file will depend on whether the Council is aware of work done on the property, how old the building is and what property information has survived from the legacy councils. But what if there is nothing on the property file? Auckland Council Archives Resources for Property Research • Auckland Council Archives holds a range of records useful for researching the histories of properties. • There are many types of property related records that are common to the legacy councils across Auckland. • However, there can be some regional differences and gaps in our holdings. • There are some property records that are unique to certain councils. 35 Grey Street, Onehunga Auckland Council Archives AKC 024/15 Building Permit Information • The Municipal Corporations Act 1876 gave local councils the power to create by- laws to deal with building issues. Even so, until about the mid-20th century the introduction and enforcement of building regulations by councils was inconsistent. • For instance, Birkenhead Borough Council building by-laws in 1910 required people to make a building application and to lodge plans and specifications with the Clerk, but there is no mention that duplicate copies were to be supplied for council records.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)
    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY INFRASTRUCTURE REFERENCE GROUP UPDATE Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 QUARTERLY IRG UPDATE 2 Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021
    Building Together • Hanga Ngātahi QUARTERLY INFRASTRUCTURE REFERENCE GROUP UPDATE Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 QUARTERLY IRG UPDATE 2 Q1: to 31 MARCH 2021 IRG PROGRAMME OVERVIEW .....................................3 PROGRESS TO DATE ................................................4 COMPLETED PROJECTS THIS QUARTER ...........................5 REGIONAL SUMMARY .............................................6 UPDATE BY REGION NORTHLAND ........................................................8 AUCKLAND .........................................................9 WAIKATO ...........................................................10 BAY OF PLENTY ....................................................11 GISBORNE ..........................................................12 HAWKE’S BAY ......................................................13 TARANAKI ..........................................................14 CONTENTS MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI ........................................15 WELLINGTON .......................................................16 TOP OF THE SOUTH ................................................17 WEST COAST .......................................................18 CANTERBURY .......................................................19 OTAGO ..............................................................20 SOUTHLAND ........................................................21 NATIONWIDE .......................................................22 FULL PROJECT LIST ................................................23 GLOSSARY ..........................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Auckland Council's Council Controlled Organisations
    Review of Auckland Council’s council- controlled organisations REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PANEL July 2020 PrefacePreface In January 2020 when we began this review, no panel member had any inkling of how challenging the next six months would prove to be, particularly with the impact of COVID-19, which forced us to conduct many meetings online – reinforcing to us the value of face-to-face interactions. Our terms of reference proved very broad indeed, spanning more than a dozen discrete topics, which made it difficult, in spite of our best efforts, to avoid writing a lengthy report. To do justice to many of these topics meant coming to grips with complex legal and factual material. There was also the challenge of writing a report the public could understand. However, we feel privileged to have had the opportunity to examine the council-controlled organisations, or CCOs, and develop what we hope are practical measures to correct the problems we identified. We thank all those who took the time and effort to participate in whatever form. Their contributions, whether in the form of documents, briefing papers, written submissions or interviews, are gratefully acknowledged. All were willing to assist us openly and constructively. We especially acknowledge the co-operative and constructive approach taken by CCOs themselves to our many requests of them. Council staff, too, deserve acknowledgement for their contribution, especially in helping us understand some of the intricacies of council policy and operations relevant to our review. We are indebted to our secretariat members Claire Gomas, Trudi Fava and Ross Chirnside. We also thank those council staff who assisted us with briefing notes and for arranging our many stakeholder interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • HRE05002-038.Pdf(PDF, 152
    Appendix S: Parties Notified List of tables Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified ........................... 837 Table S2: Interested parties notified .......................................................................... 840 Table S3: Interested Māori parties ............................................................................ 847 Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified Job Title Organisation City Manager Biosecurity Greater Wellington - The Regional Council Masterton 5915 Environment Health Officer Wairoa District Council Wairoa 4192 Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Manager, Animal Containment AgResearch Limited Hamilton 2001 Facility Group Manager, Legal AgResearch Limited Hamilton Policy Analyst Human Rights Commission Auckland 1036 Management, Monitoring & Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs Wellington 6015 Governance Fish & Game Council of New Zealand Wellington 6032 Engineer Land Transport Safety Authority Wellington 6015 Senior Fisheries Officer Fish & Game Eastern Region Rotorua 3220 Adviser Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Programme Manager Environment Waikato Hamilton 2032 Biosecurity Manager Environment Southland Invercargill 9520 Dean of Science and University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 Technology Director National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Wellington 6041 Research Limited (NIWA) Chief Executive Officer Horticulture and Food Research Institute Auckland 1020 (HortResearch Auckland) Team Leader Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Approach to Managing Auckland's Coast
    IPWEA NZ CONFERENCE 2017 DUNEDIN An Integrated Approach to Managing Auckland's Coast Paul Klinac Team Manager: Coastal and Geotechnical Services Engineering and Technical Services Unit Auckland Council. [email protected] IPWEAIPWEA NZ NZ CONFERENCE CONFERENCE 2017 DUNEDIN 2017 DUNEDIN Presentation Outline 1. Auckland's coastal environment 2. Coastal hazard context (and related issues) 3. Regulatory framework 4. Valuing the coast (assets and related uses) 5. Development of a coastal management framework & management tools • 3,100km of coastline (multiple harbours and offshore islands). • 21,000km of inland waterways. • 26 Regional Parks (~200km of undeveloped coastline). • Characterised by extensive reclamation & modification in response to urbanisation and varying degrees and types of coastal hazards. Parks Coastal Assets: Coastal defence and public access Coastal Assets Asset Count Area size (m2) Replacement Value Boat Ramps 284 38,309 $8,044,997 Jetties 3 351 $983,796 Pontoons 22 853 $1,844,510 Seawalls 796 122,067 $183,378,249 Wharves 95 13,455 $27,494,696 Grand Total 1200 175,037 ~$222 M (300M) Note: The above is confined to Parks structural assets and does not include green assets or assets under the jurisdiction of Stormwater, Auckland Transport or related CCO’s. Coastal Hazard Context: • Predominance of development immediately landward of eroding soft sedimentary cliffs or within low-lying areas. • Climate change (1m SLR by 2115) and future growth will exacerbate existing hazards. • Impacts will vary but will include: - Increased erosion and land instability; - More extensive inundation and more frequent storm surges; - Reduced performance and failure of infrastructure; and - Increased infrastructure maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Costs and Maintenance of Water-Sensitive
    Understanding Costs and Maintenance of WSUD in New Zealand Activating WSUD for Healthy Resilient Communities Understanding Costs and Maintenance of WSUD in New Zealand Activating WSUD for Healthy Resilient Communities Funded by the Building Better Homes, Towns and Cities National Science Challenge Sue Ira (Koru Environmental) Robyn Simcock (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research) July 2019 Cover: Green infrastructure (from top left): Christchurch raingarden, Auckland no-mow swales planted in native rushes, and Stoke mown swale with large trees Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Project overview .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Understanding the costs and maintenance of WSUD - scope and risks...................... 6 1.4 Report content ............................................................................................................. 7 2. Understanding and determining cost .................................................................................. 9 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton City Council the DRAFT NEW ZEALAND RAIL PLAN
    Submission by Hamilton City Council THE DRAFT NEW ZEALAND RAIL PLAN 15 May 2020 1.0 KEY SUBMISSION POINTS 1.1 Hamilton City Council (HCC) supports the focus on rail. 1.2 HCC considers that a Rapid Regional Rail Authority should be established to progress regional passenger rail and to optimise investments. 1.3 HCC considers that a priority action should be to consider hydrogen opportunities. 1.4 HCC requests activities that support the Hamilton to Auckland Passenger Rail be priority funded as well as the establishment of a Waikato/Hamilton Metro Rail Service. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 HCC welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Draft New Zealand Rail Plan. 2.2 On 17 February 2020, HCC also provided early feedback (prior to the formal engagement process) to the Ministry of Transport on the Draft New Zealand Rail Plan 2019. 2.3 This submission replaces the earlier February 2020 submission. 2.4 We would like to congratulate the Government on its foresight in developing the Draft New Zealand Rail Plan (DNZRP). 2.5 HCC notes that the DNZRP states that: • The rail network has suffered from under-investment and significant parts of the network are facing a state of managed decline. • Over the next decade investment is needed to retain the current level of service from the national network and to achieve a reliable and resilient national freight network, providing a platform for further investment to support growth in rail freight. • In Auckland and Wellington early investment in the metro rail networks has seen passenger growth outstrip expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Pdf (1
    E-newsletter: No 90. May 2011 Deadline for next issue: Wednesday 15 June 2011 Guest Message from a Council Member Hi everyone… Welcome to the May newsletter. I’ve just returned from tramping the Matemateonga track in the Whanganui National Park - although the weather wasn’t what we asked for, any opportunity given to me to ‘rough it’ in these wonderful places is hard to refuse. This area is one of the largest remaining areas of lowland forest remaining in the North Island—natural forest now covers only approximately 24% of New Zealand. This year, 2011, has been declared the International Year of Forests by the United Nations General Assembly. It is to raise awareness on sustainable management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. Make a difference by planting a tree. Keep an eye out for any local planting days. For those in the Auckland region mark in your calendar the Northern Regional Park planting days. At the conference last year, I was interested in Colin Meurk’s talk on recombinant ecosystems and a side visit to one on one of the field trips. It’s great to see Paula Warren is having success at a Porirua ‘wasteland’ site. Keep the photos coming in for our on-line library—we have reached 22,000 images, which is a great achievement, but we are always after more. Finally, subscriptions are due, follow the links for renewals. Catch you all later. Kerry Gillbanks Auckland Council In memory of Phil Knightbridge Jose Watson with additional contributions from friends Department of Conservation botanist and Plant Conservation Network member Phil Knightbridge died on Tuesday 26 April 2011.
    [Show full text]