Women and Polygamy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Negotiating Polygamy in Indonesia
Negotiating Polygamy in Indonesia. Between Muslim Discourse and Women’s Lived Experiences Nina Nurmila Dra (Bandung, Indonesia), Grad.Dip.Arts (Murdoch University, Western Australia), MA (Murdoch University) Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2007 Gender Studies - Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne ABSTRACT Unlike most of the literature on polygamy, which mainly uses theological and normative approaches, this thesis is a work of social research which explores both Indonesian Muslim discourses on polygamy and women’s lived experiences in polygamous marriages in the post-Soeharto period (after 1998). The thesis discusses the interpretations of the Qur’anic verses which became the root of Muslim controversies over polygamy. Indonesian Muslim interpretations of polygamy can be divided into three groups based on Saeed’s categorisation of the Muslim approaches to the Qur’an (2006b: 3). First, the group he refers to as the ‘Textualists’ believe that polygamy is permitted in Islam, and regard it as a male right. Second, the group he refers to as ‘Semi-textualists’ believe that Islam discourages polygamy and prefers monogamy; therefore, polygamy can only be permitted under certain circumstances such as when a wife is barren, sick and unable to fulfil her duties, including ‘serving’ her husband’s needs. Third, the group he calls ‘Contextualists’ believe that Islam implicitly prohibits polygamy because just treatment of more than one woman, the main requirement for polygamy, is impossible to achieve. This thesis argues that since the early twentieth century it was widely admitted that polygamy had caused social problems involving neglect of wives and their children. -
Thesis Polygamy on the Web: an Online Community for An
THESIS POLYGAMY ON THE WEB: AN ONLINE COMMUNITY FOR AN UNCONVENTIONAL PRACTICE Submitted by Kristen Sweet-McFarling Department of Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2014 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Lynn Kwiatkowski Cindy Griffin Barbara Hawthorne Copyright by Kristen Sweet-McFarling 2014 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT POLYGAMY ON THE WEB: AN ONLINE COMMUNITY FOR AN UNCONVENTIONAL PRACTICE This thesis is a virtual ethnographic study of a polygamy website consisting of one chat room, several discussion boards, and polygamy related information and links. The findings of this research are based on the interactions and activities of women and men on the polygamy website. The research addressed the following questions: 1) what are individuals using the website for? 2) What are website members communicating about? 3) How are individuals using the website to search for polygamous relationships? 4) Are website members forming connections and meeting people offline through the use of the website? 5) Do members of the website perceive the Internet to be affecting the contemporary practice of polygamy in the U.S.? This research focused more on the desire to create a polygamous relationship rather than established polygamous marriages and kinship networks. This study found that since the naturalization of monogamous heterosexual marriage and the nuclear family has occurred in the U.S., due to a number of historical, social, cultural, political, and economic factors, the Internet can provide a means to denaturalize these concepts and provide a space for the expression and support of counter discourses of marriage, like polygamy. -
Law Reform in the Muslim World: a Comparative Study of the Practice and Legal Framework of Polygamy in Selected Jurisdictions
International Journal of Business & Law Research 2(3):32-44, September 2014 © SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2014 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 2360-8986 LAW REFORM IN THE MUSLIM WORLD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PRACTICE AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF POLYGAMY IN SELECTED JURISDICTIONS YELWA, Isa Mansur Ph. D Researcher, Postgraduate & Research, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University, 53100, Jln Gombak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia H/P +60166194962 (Malaysia) +2348068036959 (Nigeria) Email of corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper studies the framework of family law in general and of polygamy in particular in the various jurisdictions around the Muslim world. The chronicles in the application of Islamic law in relation to polygamy in those jurisdictions are comparatively analyzed based on historical developments of their legal systems on the application of Islamic law and reforms that were introduced therein to suit the needs and challenges of legal dynamism based on suitability with the people, place and time. Jurisdictions within the sphere of the study are categorized into three, namely: 1. Jurisdictions where polygamy is practiced without regulation; 2. Jurisdictions where polygamy is outlawed; and 3. Jurisdictions where polygamy is practiced under a regulated framework. For each category, a number of relevant jurisdictions are selected for study. The legal framework on polygamy in the selected jurisdictions is briefly elaborated with precision based on the applicable statutory and judicial authorities available. The social set up of the people involved in polygamy in some jurisdictions is illustrated where needed in order to unveil the legal challenges in them. For each jurisdiction, the study examines the law that applied before, subsequent reforms that were brought into them and the contemporary applicable law and its challenges if any. -
Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 26 Issue 1 Article 2 June 2008 Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution Mark Strasser Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Mark Strasser, Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution, 26(1) LAW & INEQ. 59 (2008). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol26/iss1/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution Mark Strassert Introduction Same-sex marriage opponents frequently suggest that if same-sex unions are constitutionally protected, then polygamous unions must also be protected, as if no more must be said to establish that neither should be recognized. 1 Yet, this reductio ad absurdum fails for two distinct reasons. First, even were it constitutionally permissible for states to ban polygamous relationships, that hardly would establish that same-sex unions could also be prohibited, since the kinds of reasons that tend to be accepted as justifications for polygamy bans have little or no force in the same-sex marriage context. 2 Second, the case establishing the permissibility of polygamy bans is not nearly as obvious or strong as its opponents imply. Indeed, a strong case can be made 3 for the proposition that polygamy is constitutionally protected. Part I of this Article briefly discusses the oft-made claim that if same-sex marriages are constitutionally protected, then plural marriages must also be protected. This Part suggests that although that argument is false because the two are distinguishable in constitutionally significant ways, a good argument can be made for the proposition that both same-sex marriage and plural marriage are constitutionally protected. -
Lessons from Islamic Polygamy: a Case for Expanding the American Concept of Surviving Spouse So As to Include De Facto Polygamous Spouses
Lessons from Islamic Polygamy: A Case for Expanding the American Concept of Surviving Spouse So As to Include De Facto Polygamous Spouses Michèle Alexandre∗ Abstract While polygamy is illegal in the United States, forms of it are still practiced either overtly, pursuant to religious traditions, or covertly, by the maintenance of two or more family units. As a result, any claims, disputes, or abuses that arise in the context of de facto polygamous unions remain irremediable. My focus, in this Article, is not to advocate that polygamy should be legally recognized. Nor is it my purpose to debate the viability or morality of polygamy. Instead, I am concerned with affording legal remedies for vulnerable individuals living and operating in de facto polygamous unions. In light of the thousands of individuals living in some form of multi-party unions, I propose that it is imperative to construct adequate legal options and remedies for the parties involved in these unions. In this Article, I evaluate how a women-centric interpretation of the Qur’anic treatment of Islamic polygamy might help us assess how to best protect American women involved in de facto polygamous unions. In addition, I advocate that a redefinition of the concept of the surviving spouse in American estate distribution will help to legally protect de facto spouses in the inheritance context. Finally, I further propose that the common law marriage doctrine be used to help prove the existence of de facto polygamous unions. ∗ B.A., Colgate University; J.D., Harvard Law School. Michèle Alexandre is an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Memphis Cecil C. -
The Positive Effects of Legalizing Polygamy: “Love Is a Many Splendored Thing”
03_DUNCAN.DOC 11/10/2008 11:56:21 AM THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF LEGALIZING POLYGAMY: “LOVE IS A MANY SPLENDORED THING” EMILY J. DUNCAN* INTRODUCTION Long thought to be a hidden, rare, and cultish phenomenon, polygyny is in fact practiced by an estimated 30,000 to 100,000 people in North America.1 It has recently been the focus of an FBI “Most Wanted” national manhunt, a raid in a small Texas town, an issue in political elections, and even the subject of a hit TV show “Big Love.” Although “polygamy” is defined as “the state or practice of having more than one spouse simultaneously,”2 most polygamists in the United States engage in “polygyny,” or, “the condition or practice of having more than one wife at the same time.”3 Polygynists4 in the United States are generally Mormon fundamentalists who believe they are “the true keepers of the faith.”5 Though formally excommunicated by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (“LDS”), fundamentalists continue to follow its founder Joseph Smith’s belief, known as “the principle” or “the marriage revelation,” that “a man need[s] at least three wives to attain the ‘fullness of exaltation’ in the afterlife.”6 More specifically, women “sealed with men for eternity” grant men the ability to reach the third and highest level of heaven where they become gods.7 There is no reliable census data on the number of polygynists living in the United States,8 but it is believed that thirty to fifty thousand fundamentalist Mormons live in polygynist families and communities in the western U.S. -
Opinion Polygamy and the Rights of Women 2010
Conseil du statut de la Opinion Polygamy and the rights of women 2010 1 Conseil du statut de la Opinion Polygamy and the rights of women 2010 La traduction de l’avis du Conseil La polygamie au regard du droit des femmes (novembre 2010) a été réalisée pour le compte de la Cour suprême de la Colombie-Britannique dans le cadre d’une cause jugée en 2011 pour déterminer si l’interdiction de la polygamie par le gouvernement de cette province est cohérente avec les libertés garanties par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. The Conseil du statut de la femme is a study and advisory council which was established in 1973. It gives its opinions on all of the topics related to respect of equality, rights and status of women in Quebec. The Conseil is made up of a female Chair and 10 female members from women’s associations, universities, socio-economic groups as well as from trade unions. This opinion was adopted at the 229th members meeting of the Conseil du statut de la femme on September 17, 2010. The members of the Conseil are (2010) Christine Pelchat, Chair, Nathalie Chapados, Véronique De Sève, Francyne Ducharme, Roxane Duhamel, Marjolaine Étienne, Carole Gingras, Élaine Hémond, Rakia Laroui, Ludmilla Prismy and Catherine des Rivières-Pigeon. We would like to particularly thank, Louise Langevin, professeur at the Faculty of Law at Laval University for her precious commentaries. Research, Writing and Translation Validation Research and Writing Coordination Yolande Geadah, M.A. Marie-Andrée Allard, Christiane Pelchat Collaboration Publishing Coordination (French) Caroline Beauchamp, LL.B. -
Polygamy After Windsor: What's Religion Got to Do With
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\9-2\HLP206.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-JUL-15 15:23 Polygamy After Windsor: What’s Religion Got to Do with It? Casey E. Faucon* Ever since the 1878 case, Reynolds v. United States, polygamists have argued that their plural marriage practices are protected by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. After Lawrence v. Texas, polygamists added substantive Due Pro- cess arguments under the Fourteenth Amendment’s “intimacy privacy” interpretation to their arsenal. This article argues that in order for polygamists to find constitu- tional protection and recognition, they must shed their arguments founded in relig- ion and rely instead on substantive Due Process. Although First Amendment jurisprudence would subject polygamy bans to a higher level of scrutiny, this height- ened protection comes at a cost. The landmark same-sex marriage case, United States v. Windsor, and the opinion’s protected liberty interest of “equal dignity” provides polygamy advocates with substantive grounds to protect their plural mar- riage practices, as well as pave the way for recognition of “intimate pluralism” and alternative relationship forms like polyamory and group marriage. I. INTRODUCTION The legal tide is beginning to shift in favor of polygamists in America. On December 13, 2013, the Utah federal district court struck a prong of Utah’s criminal anti-polygamy statute as being unconstitutional in violation of the polygamous family’s First Amendment and substantive Due Process rights.1 The family members at the heart of Brown v. Buhman -
Stealing Women, Stealing Men: Co-Creating Cultures of Polygamy in a Pesantren Community in Eastern Indonesia Bianca J
Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 8 Jan-2014 Stealing Women, Stealing Men: Co-creating Cultures of Polygamy in a Pesantren Community in Eastern Indonesia Bianca J. Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Cover Page Footnote: This is a revised version of the author's original article, which appeared in Journal of International Women's Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1 (November 2009). Recommended Citation Smith, Bianca J. (2014). Stealing Women, Stealing Men: Co-creating Cultures of Polygamy in a Pesantren Community in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of International Women's Studies, 15(1), 118-135. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol15/iss1/8 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Stealing Women, Stealing Men: Co-creating Cultures of Polygamy in a Pesantren Community in Eastern Indonesia Cover Page Footnote This is a revised version of the author's original article, which appeared in Journal of International Women's Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1 (November 2009). This article is available in Journal of International Women's Studies: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol15/iss1/8 This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2014 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Stealing Women, Stealing Men: Co-creating Cultures of Polygamy in a Pesantren Community in Eastern Indonesia By Bianca J. -
Pdf 16 HLA Hart, the Concept of Law , Oxford University, Oxford, 1961, 86-87
al-Ihkam : Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial, 14 (2), 2019: 236-266 ISSN: 1907-591X, E-ISSN: 2442-3084 DOI: http://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v14i2.2396 Polygamy Marriage: Legal Culture, Optional Political Identity and Marital Status Dilemma (A Case Study in Pekalongan) Shinta Dewi Rismawati IAIN Pekalongan, Jl. Kusuma Bangsa No. 9 Pekalongan, 51141 Email: [email protected] Muhammad Abral Bin Abu Bakar HELP University, No. 15, Jalan Sri Semantan 1, Off Jalan Semantan, Bukit Damansara Kuala Lumpur, 50490 Article history: Received: 26 Juni 2019, Accepted: 12 Oktober 2019, Published: 4 Desember 2019 Abstract: Indonesian marriage law allows polygamy but with alternative and cumulative strict conditions. The novelty of this paper shows that the legal culture of polygamists is an important element that determines their optional political identity and marital status. This paper criticizes the legal culture in carrying out the polygamous marriages along with optional political identity and legal marital status of the actors. Qualitative research with the approach of social legal study was used to reveal the reality of polygamy among six couples. The findings and analysis show that the legal culture of the actors in either obeying or disobeying the rules of polygamy was subjective. However, the majority is diseobedient because they tend to break the rules, for instance by doing polygamy with sirri marriage. Sirri marriage is a political identity of life choice because of various considerations on both juridical and non-juridical ones. This condition has implications for the legal status dilemma of polygamous marriages. A marital status is considered legal only when the marriage is officially held and on the contrary, it is considered illegal in sirri condition. -
Gebremeskel Hailu Tesfay Abstract a Variety of Researches Conducted In
HARAMAYA LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 (2017) ISSN: 2227-2178 (P) & 2305-3739 (E) To cite this note: Gebremeskel Hailu Tesfay, Note on The Adverse Effects of Polygamy on the Rights of Women: A Case Study in Gedeo and Sidama Zones, HARAMAYA LAW REVIEW 6 (2017): 91-110 ____________________ NOTE ON: THE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF POLYGAMY ON THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN: A CASE STUDY IN GEDEO AND SIDAMA ZONES Gebremeskel Hailu Tesfay Abstract A variety of researches conducted in diverse contexts of Ethiopia found that polygamy type of family relationship hinders the realization of the rights of women in many respects. This research inquires whether the polygamous life style practiced in Gedeo and Sidama Zones adversely affects the rights of women in the same way. To deal with this question, the research has reviewed the legal status of polygamy under the international human rights instruments ratified by Ethiopia and the Ethiopian legal system. It also scrutinizes how polygamous marriages affect the rights of women in Gedeo and Sidama Zones using interview and focus group discussions. The study finds that while the prohibition against polygamy is presumed in the constitutional provisions, there is leniency in the subsidiary laws in Ethiopia. This practice is found to affect the social, economic, and civil rights of women in the study areas. Based on these findings, this article recommends that the Federal and SNNPR governments should revisit their respective laws to outlaw polygamy. Besides, to enhance voluntary compliance of the laws, educational campaigns have to be conducted revealing the adverse effects of polygamy on women and the society as a whole. -
The Case for Polygamous Marriage After United States V
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2015 "I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wives": The Case for Polygamous Marriage after United States v. Windsor and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Peter N. Swisher University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Family Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter N. Swisher, "I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wives": The Case for Polygamous Marriage after United States v. Windsor and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, BYU J. Pub. L. (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wives": The Case for Polygamous Marriage after United States v. Windsor and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores PeterNash Swisher * "Unconventional [marital] relationships between men and women are now at least tolerated. We hear of.... homosexual marriages, new types of marriagesare now advocated, and the institution of marriage,as well as the conduct of married persons, is being subjected to fewer legal restraints. The Victorian Age of [Chief Justicel Morrison Waite [who wrote Reynolds v. United States in 1876] is far behind us... " "Marriageis both a private and public institution.Although it involves an individual's deeply personal decision to make a lifelong commitment to another, states place strictures on who has the right to marry and confir benefits and obligations on married individuals.